7KH&RPPRQ/DZLV1RW'HDG

University of Texas
27th Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals

-XQH

'DYLG.HOWQHU
GDYLGNHOWQHU#NHOO\KDUWFRP

,W¶VDERXWFDXVDWLRQ± VWXSLG

‡ 6LQFH -DQXDU\   WKH 6XSUHPH &RXUW KDV LVVXHG VHYHUDO

FDXVDWLRQ FDVHV 7KHVH FDVHV DUH QRW RQO\ LPSRUWDQW LQ WKHLU
RZQ ULJKW EXW JLYH XV D ZLQGRZ LQWR SDVW FDVHV WR ZKLFK WKH
&RXUW FRQWLQXDOO\ UHIHUV


 3UR[LPDWHFDXVH ³FDXVHLQIDFW´
³IRUHVHHDELOLW\´

,Q DQ XQEURNHQ OLQH RI FDVHV WKH 6XSUHPH &RXUW UHFRJQL]HV WKDW

DQ DFW RPLVVLRQ RU EUHDFK LV D proximate cause RI DQ LQMXU\ LI WKH
EUHDFK ZDV  D cause in fact RI WKH KDUP DQG  WKH LQMXU\ ZDV
foreseeable

Stanfield v. Neubaum  6:G   7H[  

HMC Hotel Props. II Ltd. P’ship v. Keystone-Texas Prop.
Holding Corp.  6:G   7H[  

&DXVHLQIDFW

‡ &DXVH LQ IDFW UHTXLUHV WKH DFW RPLVVLRQ RU EUHDFK WR EH D

substantial factor LQ EULQJLQJ DERXW WKH KDUP DQG

‡ But for WKH DFW RPLVVLRQ RU EUHDFK WKH KDUP ZRXOG QRW RFFXU

‡ ,Q RWKHU ZRUGV substantial factor DQG but for causation DUH

ERWK QHFHVVDU\ WR SURYH cause in fact.

HMC Hotel Props. II Ltd. P’ship v. Keystone-Texas Prop.

Holding Corp.  6:G   7H[  


 1HZDQGLQGHSHQGHQW
superseding cause v. concurring cause

‡ $ QHZ DQG LQGHSHQGHQW FDXVH ³GHVWUR\V´ WKH FDXVDO FRQQHFWLRQ

EHWZHHQ WKH DFW RPLVVLRQ RU GXW\ DQG WKH HYHQWXDO KDUP

‡ 2Q WKH RWKHU KDQG FRQFXUULQJ FDXVH FRQWLQXHV WKH KDUP

FDXVHG E\ WKH ILUVW DFW RPLVVLRQ RU EUHDFK

Stanfield v. Neubaum6:G 7H[ 

-XGLFLDOHUURU QHZLQGHSHQGHQW
DQGLQWHUYHQLQJFDXVH
Stanfield v. Neubaum6:G 7H[

‡ $ OHJDO PDOSUDFWLFH FDVH GHDOLQJ ZLWK OLWLJDWLRQ FRQGXFW LQ DQ XQGHUO\LQJ XVXU\ FDVH

‡ 7KH GHIHQVH ODZ\HUV UDLVHG WKH GHIHQVHV RI  bona fide HUURU DQG  D XVXU\ FXUHOHWWHU

‡ 1HLWKHU GHIHQVH ZDV UDLVHG DW WULDO

‡ ,QVWHDG WKH GHIHQVH ODZ\HUV DUJXHG WKDW WKH SHUVRQ ZKR PDGH WKH ORDQ ZDV QRW WKH DJHQW RI
WKHLU GHIHQGDQWFOLHQW

‡ $IWHU DQ XQIRUWXQDWH YHUGLFW WKH GHIHQGDQWFOLHQW VXHG WKH ODZ\HUV IRU IDLOLQJ WR UDLVH WKH bona
fide HUURU DQG XVXU\ FXUHOHWWHU GHIHQVHV

‡ ,Q WKH PHDQWLPH D QHZ ODZ\HU DSSHDOHG WKH DGYHUVH MXGJPHQW

‡ 7KH FRXUW RI DSSHDOV UHYHUVHG WKH DJHQF\ ILQGLQJ DQG KHOG WKDW QR DJHQF\ H[LVWHG DV D PDWWHU
RI ODZ²UHQGHULQJ MXGJPHQW IRU WKH GHIHQGDQWFOLHQW

‡ 1RQHWKHOHVV WKH FOLHQW FRQWLQXHG WKH PDOSUDFWLFH FODLP E\ FODLPLQJ WKDW WKH DSSHDO ZRXOG QRW
KDYH EHHQ QHFHVVDU\ LI WKH bona fide HUURU DQG WKH XVXU\ FXUHOHWWHU GHIHQVHV KDG EHHQ UDLVHG


Find the full text of this and thousands of other resources from leading experts in dozens of
legal practice areas in the UT Law CLE eLibrary (utcle.org/elibrary)

Title search: The Common Law Is Not Dead

Also available as part of the eCourse

Texas Appellate Law Hot Topics: The Common Law, Statutory Interpretation,
Malpractice, and More

First appeared as part of the conference materials for the

27th Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals session
"The Common Law Is Not Dead"