Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tabatana 2023 Report
Tabatana 2023 Report
Tabatana 2023 Report
&
BOND WORK INDEX
Report Prepared
by
Trust T. Masiya
Institute of Mining Research
University of Zimbabwe
P.O. Box MP167
Mt Pleasant, Harare
Cel. No.: +263772424105
e-mail: trumasiya@gmail.com
For
Tabatana Mines
Mudzi
Contact Person
Evans Masiko
Cel No. +263716998657
e-mail: masikoevans@gmail.com
26 November, 2023
Disclaimer
The data provided in this report and the associated interpretations offered are based on the
samples made available to the consultant by the client. No assurances can be made by the
Consultant on the representativity of the samples supplied and tested.
1. INTRODUCTION
The Institute of Mining Research was contracted by Tabatana Mine to carry out a metallurgical
test-work of their ores. The scope of the test-work included the chemical characterization,
grindability tests, diagnostic leach test and determination of the Bond Mill Works Index of the
ore.
2. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND HEAD ASSAY
Two different lumpy samples, ~22.2kg grayish and 48kgs brownish were availed for the test-
work. The as-received samples were first sun-dried, followed by crushing to less than 3.325mm,
mixed and homogenized in the ratios they were received. The homogenized samples were split
by a riffle splitter into aliquots of approximately 1.0kg each which were used for the head assay
determinations, sieve analysis, bond work index test and the diagnostic tests. The gold content in
solids were determined by fire assay, other elements by wet methods and gold in solution by the
AAS machine. The diagnostic test was done on the 80% passing 75µm material which was
determined through milling calibration curves.
Figure 1: Supplied ore samples on receiving (left) and after crushing (right)
Parameter Value
Gold (g/ton) 46.7-73.2
Copper (%) 0.04
Nickel (%) 0.01
Lead (%) 0.04
Fe2O3 (%) 8.57
CaO (%) 2.36
SiO2 (%) 73.90
Arsenic (%) 0.01
MgO (%) 0.36
Sb% 0.05
After the test is completed, a metallurgical balance is calculated to determine the distribution of
gold recovered during each stage of the test. The diagnostic test was done on the homogenized
sample ground to 80% passing 75μm. The test samples and leach residue were analyzed by fire
assay for total gold content whilst the Au in solution by AAS. The schematic presentation of the
test-work and detailed results obtained are presented in Figure 2 and the Appendix I respectively.
Figure 2 shows the sequence and conditions of acid leaching steps proposed in this diagnostic
leach tests.
Table 3: Gold distribution in various mineral phases for the two samples
Distribution
Inferred Deportment
g/ton %
Cyanide Soluble 55.30 97.14
Oxides and carbonates & pyrrhotite locked 1.45 2.55
Pyrite, marcasite & arsenopyrite locked 0.02 0.04
Carbonaceous material locked 0.07 0.13
Silicates locked (balance) 0.08 0.14
Total 56.93 100.00
Where BWi is the Bond ball work index, Pi is the screen test size in microns (75µm), Gbp is the
average net grams undersize (-75µm) per revolution, P80 is the 80% product passing size in
microns and F80 is the 80% feed passing size in microns.
Parameter
F80 Feed 3,000µm
P80 Product 66µm
A B C D E F G H
Grinding New Feed <75µm <75 Undersize %Circulati
<75µm Revs
Cycle (g) Present Produced (g/rev) on Load
1 1132.0 98.48 100 230.0 131.52 1.315 392.2
2 230.0 20.01 200 284.0 263.99 1.320 298.6
3 284.0 24.71 200 292.0 267.29 1.336 287.7
4 292.0 25.40 200 299.0 273.60 1.368 278.6
5 299.0 26.01 200 311.0 284.99 1.425 264.0
6 311.0 27.06 200 310.5 283.44 1.417 264.6
7 310.5 27.01 200 312.0 284.99 1.425 262.8
NB: The yellow shaded cells shows that the last three cycles gave a constant value of ore grindability
(g/rev)-as required for the calculation of the Bond Work index.
Gbp = average grindability g/rev of the last three cycles (5, 6 & 7) {from Table 7)
= (1.425+1.417+1.425)/3
= 1.422g/rev
Pi= 75µm
F80 = 3,000 µm
P80= 66µm
Substituting into Equation 1
BWi = 11.78KWhr/ton
T.T. Masiya
Research Metallurgist
GOLD DEPORTMENT
NB: It is important to note that diagnostic leaching will not ever replace mineralogical evaluations as it cannot selectively leach only one mineral. It only suggests with which group of minerals the
gold is associated with. For example during the acid digestion steps it can be identified that the majority of the gold is associated either with hydrochloric acid digestible minerals (such as pyrhotite,
calcite, dolomite, galena, goethite, calcium carbonate, and may also include calcine, hematite and ferrites) or with nitric acid digestible minerals (arsenonpyrite, pyrite and marcasite)