Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stevens 1986 Cost Control Integrated Cost Schedule Performance
Stevens 1986 Cost Control Integrated Cost Schedule Performance
PERFORMANCE
INTRODUCTION
There are many different views on the subject of cost control. To ac-
countants, designers or managers cost control can be boring, irritating
or fascinating. Opinions are naturally influenced by individual respon-
sibilities.
To a manager, the key to a project's success lies in establishing effec-
tive control parameters for the variables of cost, time, a n d performance.
In doing this, the process of the routine collection, verification a n d quan-
tification of data with which we are all familiar is needed only for his-
torical reference and has little other purpose. Something else is required
for the control to be effective.
One cost control tool used by project managers at Lockwood, An-
drews & N e w n a m , Inc., has been found to be very powerful in its ap-
plication, yet fairly simple to develop a n d easy to understand. It is the
Integrated Cost/Schedule Performance Curve—a visual summation of
costs, performance, and time. Fig. 1 shows a typical curve a n d its gen-
eral plots.
It is not n e w or dramatic; it has been widely used. Yet as a cost control
tool, it can be of great value to the manager interested in the effective
monitoring and control of a project.
BACKGROUND
157
159
Cumulative
Budget
the scheduled curve indicating that the project is behind schedule. The
actual amount can be determined by extending a horizontal line from
Point A back to Point B on the schedule and measuring the "schedule
slippage."
Similarly, the plotted cost, Point E, is located above the scheduled
budget, but the amount of variation present in this parameter is not
immediately apparent. The scheduled cost of the actual accomplishment
must be determined rather than the cost listed for the current time frame.
By extending a line vertically from Point B on the scheduled accomplish-
ment until it hits the cumulative budget at Point C, what the cost for
that accomplishment should have been can be determined. Continuing
a horizontal line from that point over to point D on the current time
frame shows us what the actual cost situation is—in this case, a cost
overrun (the vertical difference between D and E).
A more positive result is shown in Fig. 4. Following the same pro-
cedures as before, this sample project is ahead of schedule and under
budget. Other combinations are also possible.
ILLUSTRATIONS
project are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. To make it easier to trace the plots,
the pertinent data from a date time line of 14 months (through the month
of June) has been magnified. Fig. 5 is for the total project, and Fig. 6 is
for direct labor charges only.
*>.«,
Actual
Accomplishment
161
FORECASTS OR PREDICTIONS
+2 -
11" "~"v^ v=
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad De Lima on 02/25/24. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
a
CO
. . _. -- ^
-3 - — — —
-4
5 6 7 8
tion rather than of fact. For example, a project cost forecast which is
developed solely on the basis of the scheduled completion date may not
reflect what is really occurring (maybe the job is well ahead of schedule).
Likewise, a forecast time of completion tells you nothing about what has
happened to the budget. All three parameters of time, money, and ac-
complishment must be considered together in order to make good eval-
uations and predictions.
An Integrated Cost/Schedule Performance Curve is excellent for this
purpose. By using the recorded variance data available from previous
periods, we can make a trendline analysis and forecast such critical items
as: (1) Estimated time of completion; and (2) estimated cost overrun or
underrun.
Various display curves and graphics may be developed to high-light
potential (and actual) problems, but the objective of such aids should be
to initiate the proper corrective action before the problems seriously af-
fect the job progress.
As an example of a forecasting procedure, the variances indicated ear-
TABLE 1.—Variances
Total Project Direct Labor
Schedule Time Money ($) Time Money ($)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
5 months —1.5 weeks -18,000 +1.0 week +4,250
8 months +1.0 week -75,100 — 1.0 week +8,140
11 months -2.5 weeks -25,083 -0.5 week +6,245
14 months -3.5 weeks -109,803 -4.0 weeks +22,152
Projections at 4 to 5 weeks $130,000 6 weeks behind $27,000
completion behind schedule underrun schedule overrun
Note: These slippages were caused by extended revisions to the basic scope
of work. The corrective action taken was a time extension to the basic contract
and an adjustment in the various cost categories.
163
CONCLUSION
164