1. The document discusses various principles of natural justice and administrative law, including audi alteram partem, bias, right to legal representation, judicial review of administrative decisions, privileges and immunities of the state, and tortious liability of the state.
2. It provides examples of cases related to principles like bias, right to cross-examination, post-decisional hearings, and judicial control over administrative discretion.
3. The document also discusses topics like privileges and immunity of the state, tortious liability of the state, and the binding nature of state decisions.
1. The document discusses various principles of natural justice and administrative law, including audi alteram partem, bias, right to legal representation, judicial review of administrative decisions, privileges and immunities of the state, and tortious liability of the state.
2. It provides examples of cases related to principles like bias, right to cross-examination, post-decisional hearings, and judicial control over administrative discretion.
3. The document also discusses topics like privileges and immunity of the state, tortious liability of the state, and the binding nature of state decisions.
1. The document discusses various principles of natural justice and administrative law, including audi alteram partem, bias, right to legal representation, judicial review of administrative decisions, privileges and immunities of the state, and tortious liability of the state.
2. It provides examples of cases related to principles like bias, right to cross-examination, post-decisional hearings, and judicial control over administrative discretion.
3. The document also discusses topics like privileges and immunity of the state, tortious liability of the state, and the binding nature of state decisions.
2. Ghyam Shyam Das V State of UP 3. Mineral Development V State of Bihar – the petitioner company leased village for 99 years. The owner of the company has previously opposed the minister in general elections. The minister has cancelled his license. Though the act was quasi-judicial in nature, the order was vitiated due to personal bias. 4. Khadam Singh V Muralidhar - 5. Subasamania Swamy V Jayalalitha Judge witness combination 1. Manek Lal V Prem Chand – in this case, Manek lal who was an advocate was filed for professional misconduct – bar council tribunal was appointed- the chairman had already represented the respondent in a case – so he was not allowed to represent as justice has to be like it is been given in litigating public. 2. Mean glass tea estate V worksman 3. UP V mahamath nova Departmental bias 1. Gullapalli Nageshwara Rao V APSRTC – about institutional decision. An administrative aaction was challenged which was heard by one party but decided by the CM. argued that they wont be able to clear doubts aout argument. Held, no violation of natural justice. 2. Kondala Rao v APSRTC Audi alteram Partem 1. Hiranath Mishran V Rajendra Medical college – girls gave compliant for harassment against 4 people by properly identifying them. Principle didn’t give show cause notice, held the case was hornitos so the concept of natural justice is flexibly applied. 2. UP Warehouse V Vijay Narayan – certain witnesses were not recorded in front of the dismissed bank employee. Held it was denial of natural justice. 3. Agganwal V Harayana 4. Railway Protection Force V K Raguram Bahu Right to legal representation 1. AK Roy V UOI – right to legal representation is not applicable to preventive detention cases by virtue or article 22 (3). Held that is the government has legal representation then the other party should also have legal representation as per article 14. 2. Board of trustees of port of Bombay V Pilip Kumar 3. JK Agarwal V Haryana seeds development corp ltd 4. Swadeshi Cotton Mills V UOI – There are certain exceptions to the rule of natural justice. The word “immediate” that is refered in the provision of industries act doesn’t not make it fair to exclude the procedures to be followed. Post decisional hearing 1. Maneka Gandhi V UOI 2. HL Trehan V UOI Judicial control of administrative discretion 1. Jaganath Mishra V State of Orissa 2. Kesavan V State of Kerala 3. Shiyanandhan Baswan V State of Bihar 4. Asha Devi 5. Dwaraka das Bhatiya v State of JK 6. Sardar Singh V UOI – An army javan who was permitted to get only four bottles of rum, got eleven bottles for which he was punished with 3m rigorous imprisonment and dismissal from service. SC held the punishment to be severe and arbitrary. 7. Prathap Singh v state of Punjab 8. EP Royyappa V State of Tamilnadu Privileges and immunities of state 1. UOI V Anglo-Afghan Agencies 2. MP Sugar Mills V State of UP 3. State of Punjab V Nestle products ltd 4. Thaniska trading company v State of UP 5. Maxey charam V Rohilkhand university 6. Dunken Campbell company Ltd 7. Conway V Rimmer 8. UOI V Sodhi Sukhdev Singh 9. Indhira Gandhi v Raj Narayan – though it is said that the administrative decisions are final, it is still subjected to judicial review process. It is about the 39th amendment that removed the clause that is capable of holding the elections void. 10. Manohar Lal v Narendra Modi Tortious liability of the state 1. Adhyavathi v State of Rajasthan 2. Kasturi Lal v State of UP – in this case, police took under their custody Kasthuri lal suspecting the gold he possessed in hand. He said he was a gold smith but then also he was arrested and his gold was under the police custody which was stolen by another constable. In this case the govt is not liable as it is a sovereign function. 3. Satyavathi v UOI 4. Kathri v state of bihar 5. Rudhsar v state of Bihar Binding nature of state 1. Director of ration v corporation of Kolkata 2. Superintendent of remembrance of legal office V Corp of Kolkata Natural justice Pecuniary, departmental bias, Bias everything Institutional decisions Judicial control of administrative discretion Audi alterem partem Right to cross examination Right to legal representation Post decisional hearing Exclusion of report Exclusion, waiver of audi alterem partem Notice Acting mechanically Self imposed fetters Subdelegation of power Acting under dictation Abuse of discretion Irrelevant consideration Mixed consideration Doctrine of proportionality Malafide exercise of power Privileges and immunity of the state Tortious liability of the state Contractual liability of the state Substantive and procedural law