Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jackson 2015
Jackson 2015
Over the past 25 years, K. H. Head and Roger test (D 2435), e.g., specimen size, load pressures, and
Epps have prepared three editions of their classic equipment.
geotechnical laboratory text in three volumes. For the The third edition of Volume I (soil classification
environmental and engineering geoscientist, the man- and compaction tests; Head, 2006) includes seven
ual is most helpful in explaining the principles of chapters: (1) scope and general requirements; (2)
testing soil materials and how the numerical values moisture content and index tests; (3) density and
are generated. Thus, expertise in data interpretation is particle density; (4) particle size; (5) chemical tests; (6)
enhanced by inspection and mastery of the testing compaction tests; and (7) description of soils.
methods. The third edition of Volume II (permeability, shear
The third edition of Manual of Soil Laboratory strength, and compressibility tests; Head and Epps,
Testing. Volume III: Effective Stress Tests (2014), was 2011) has a further seven chapters: (8) scope,
recently published by the Scottish publishing house equipment, and laboratory practice; (9) preparation
Whittles, thus completing the updating of the test of test specimens; (10) permeability and erodibility
methods. Therefore, this is a suitable time to review tests; (11) California bearing ratio; (12) direct shear
this multi-volume textbook. Some may recognize the tests; (13) undrained compression tests; and (14)
engineering geologist Roger Epps as the lead author oedometer consolidation tests.
of the chapter on ground investigation and testing in The third edition of Volume III (effective stress
the Geological Society of London’s 2012 monograph tests; Head and Epps, 2014) consists of a final eight
on Hot Deserts, reviewed in this journal by Robert chapters: (15) effective stress testing principles:
Watters (2013) of the University of Nevada. theory and practice; (16) stress paths in triaxial
Volume I of the series was originally published in testing; (17) test equipment; (18) calibrations, correc-
1980 to describe the U.K. standards, but it has been tions, and general practice; (19) routine effective
revised over the years along with the other volumes stress triaxial tests; (20) further triaxial shear strength
to account for changes in the British standards and tests; (21) triaxial consolidation and permeability
the adoption of tests in 2010 developed by the tests; and (22) hydraulic consolidation and perme-
European Union, i.e., Eurocode 7, Geotechnical ability tests.
Design, which are replacing the British Standards The three-volume set is not a cookbook for
Institute tests. laboratory technicians, although that is certainly
Most importantly for North American readers, the one of the uses considered by the authors. Each
manual identifies those tests that are similar to or the volume contains the theoretical basis of measurement
same as the standardized tests of the American that is most helpful to geoscientists who may never
Society of Testing Materials (ASTM). Thus, in have taken a course in geotechnical engineering or
Volume I, Chapter 4, on particle size, Procedure soil mechanics. Thus, Volume II, Chapter 8 describes
4.8.3 Hydrometer Analysis identifies both the BS the use, calibration, and care of geotechnical
1377 standard and the ASTM D 422 standard as laboratory instruments from pressure transducers
references. The text clarifies that two types of to load rings. Later in this volume, Chapter 10
hydrometer are specified by ASTM. Similarly, con- presents a useful introduction to the laboratory
solidation testing (BS 1377) is described in Volume II measurement of hydraulic conductivity, therein re-
in detail, and then a section is devoted to describing ferred to by the old and incorrect terminology
the specific differences in the ASTM consolidation ‘‘permeability’’ or ‘‘coefficient of permeability,’’
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, Vol. XXI, No. 3, August 2015, pp. 247–248 247
Book Review
248 Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, Vol. XXI, No. 3, August 2015, pp. 247–248