Professional Documents
Culture Documents
eNCPT 2020 Lengkap
eNCPT 2020 Lengkap
eNCPT 2020 Lengkap
This is a combined list of Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation terms. All terms can be used for Nutrition Assessment. Client History terms are used for
Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation. Each term is designated with an alpha numeric NCPT hierarchical code, followed by a five-digit
(eg, 99999) Academy SNOMED CT/LOINC unique identifier (ANDUID). Neither should be used in nutrition documentation. The ANDUID is for data-tracking
purposes in electronic health records.
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
Type, amount, and pattern of intake of foods and food ❑ Fluid measured intake from food FH-1.2.1.2.2 14038
groups, indices of diet quality, intake of fluids, ❑ Fluid measured intake per kg in 24 hours FH-1.2.1.2.3 14039
breastmilk and infant formula ❑ Free water measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.2.1.2.4 14040
Fluid intake (1.2.1) ❑ Free water measured intake from FH-1.2.1.2.4.1 14041
❑ Estimated fluid intake FH-1.2.1.1 14011 breastmilk in 24 hours
❑ Total fluid estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.2.1.1.1 14012 ❑ Free water measured intake from FH-1.2.1.2.4.2 14042
infant formula in 24 hours
❑ Fluid estimated intake from oral FH-1.2.1.1.1.1 11386
nutrition in 24 hours ❑ Free water measured intake from FH-1.2.1.2.4.3 14043
enteral nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Water estimated oral intake in 24 hours FH-1.2.1.1.1.2 14013
❑ Free water measured intake from FH-1.2.1.2.4.4 14044
❑ Sugar sweetened beverage estimated FH-1.2.1.1.1.3 14014
parenteral nutrition in 24 hours
oral intake in 24 hours
❑ Free water measured intake from FH-1.2.1.2.4.5 14045
❑ Beverage with high intensity sweetener FH-1.2.1.1.1.4 14015
intravenous fluids in 24 hours
estimated oral intake in 24 hours
❑ 100 percent fruit juice estimated oral FH-1.2.1.1.1.5 14016
intake in 24 hours Food intake (1.2.2)
❑ Amount of food FH-1.2.2.1 10012
1
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021.
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Estimated amount of food FH-1.2.2.1.1 13125 ❑ Breastmilk intake measured volume in 24 FH-1.2.3.1.6.1 11408
❑ Grain servings estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.1.1 11387 hours
❑ Fruit servings estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.1.2 11389 ❑ Breastmilk intake measured volume per FH-1.2.3.1.6.2 14061
kg in 24 hours
❑ Vegetable servings estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.1.3 11391
❑ Milk product servings estimated in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.1.4 11393
❑ Infant formula intake FH-1.2.3.2 10019
hours ❑ Infant formula feedings in 24 hours FH-1.2.3.2.1 11412
❑ Protein food servings estimated in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.1.5 11395 ❑ Adequacy of infant formula intake FH-1.2.3.2.2 11413
hours ❑ Infant formula intake composition FH-1.2.3.2.3 14211
❑ Fat servings estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.1.6 11397 ❑ Infant formula intake concentration FH-1.2.3.2.4 14062
❑ Empty energy servings estimated in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.1.7 11399 ❑ Estimated infant formula intake FH-1.2.3.2.5 14063
hours ❑ Infant formula intake estimated volume in FH-1.2.3.2.5.1 11410
❑ Estimated percent of meals eaten in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.1.8 14046 24 hours
hours ❑ Infant formula intake estimated volume FH-1.2.3.2.5.2 14064
❑ Measured amount of food FH-1.2.2.1.2 13126 per kg in 24 hours
❑ Grain servings measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.2.1 11388 ❑ Measured infant formula intake FH-1.2.3.2.6 14065
❑ Fruit servings measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.2.2 11390 ❑ Infant formula intake measured volume in FH-1.2.3.2.6.1 11411
❑ Vegetable servings measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.2.3 11392 24 hours
❑ Milk product servings measured in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.2.4 11394 ❑ Infant formula intake measured volume FH-1.2.3.2.6.2 14066
hours per kg in 24 hours
❑ Protein food servings measured in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.2.5 11396 Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Intake (1.3)
hours Specialized nutrition support intake from all sources,
❑ Fat servings measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.1.2.6 11398 eg, enteral and parenteral routes.
❑ Empty energy servings measured in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.2.7 11400 Enteral nutrition intake (1.3.1)
hours ❑ Enteral nutrition formula/solution FH-1.3.1.1 10022
❑ Measured percent of meals eaten in 24 FH-1.2.2.1.2.8 14047 ❑ Enteral nutrition formula composition FH-1.3.1.1.1 11414
hours
❑ Enteral nutrition formula concentration FH-1.3.1.1.2 11415
❑ Types of food FH-1.2.2.2 10013
❑ Enteral nutrition formula estimated volume in FH-1.3.1.1.3 11416
❑ Fortified food intake FH-1.2.2.2.1 14048 24 hours
❑ Enriched food intake FH-1.2.2.2.2 14049 ❑ Enteral nutrition formula measured volume in FH-1.3.1.1.4 13227
❑ Special dietary food intake FH-1.2.2.2.3 14050 24 hours
❑ Medical food intake FH-1.2.2.2.4 14051 ❑ Enteral tube feeding flush estimated volume in FH-1.3.1.2 10023
❑ Processed food intake FH-1.2.2.2.5 14052 24 hours
❑ Quick service food intake FH-1.2.2.2.6 14053 ❑ Enteral tube feeding flush measured volume in FH-1.3.1.3 13228
❑ Self prepared food intake FH-1.2.2.2.7 14054 24 hours
❑ Estimated meal and snack pattern FH-1.2.2.3.1 13127 ❑ IV fluids FH-1.3.2.2 10026
❑ Number of meals estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.3.1.1 11404 Bioactive Substance Intake (1.4)
❑ Number of snacks estimated in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.3.1.2 11402 Alcohol, plant stanol and sterol esters, soy protein,
psyllium and beta glucan, and caffeine intake from all
❑ Measured meal and snack pattern FH-1.2.2.3.2 13128
sources, eg, food, beverages, supplements, and via
❑ Number of meals measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.3.2.1 11405
enteral and parenteral routes.
❑ Number of snacks measured in 24 hours FH-1.2.2.3.2.2 11403
Alcohol intake (1.4.1)
❑ Diet quality index FH-1.2.2.4 10015
❑ Alcohol intake in one week FH-1.4.1.1 14172
❑ Healthy eating index (HEI) 2015 score FH-1.2.2.4.1 14055
❑ Alcohol intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.1.2 14173
❑ Food variety FH-1.2.2.5 10016
❑ Beer intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.1.2.1 14174
Breastmilk/infant formula intake (1.2.3) ❑ Distilled alcohol intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.1.2.2 14175
❑ Breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1 10018 ❑ Wine intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.1.2.3 14176
❑ Breastmilk feeding attempts in 24 hours FH-1.2.3.1.1 11406 ❑ Hard cider intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.1.2.4 14177
❑ Adequacy of breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1.2 11409 ❑ Days per week alcoholic drinks consumed FH-1.4.1.3 14188
❑ Donor breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1.3 14056
❑ Alcohol intake pattern on drinking days FH-1.4.1.4 10031
❑ Mother’s expressed breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1.4 14057
Bioactive substance intake (1.4.2)
❑ Estimated breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1.5 14058
❑ Estimated bioactive substance intake FH-1.4.2.1 13129
❑ Breastmilk intake estimated volume in 24 FH-1.2.3.1.5.1 11407
❑ Plant stanol ester estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.1.1 11422
hours
❑ Breastmilk intake estimated volume per FH-1.2.3.1.5.2 14059
❑ Plant sterol ester estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.1.2 11424
kg in 24 hours ❑ Soy protein estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.1.3 11426
❑ Measured breastmilk intake FH-1.2.3.1.6 14060 ❑ Psyllium estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.1.4 11428
❑ Beta glucan estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.1.5 11430
2
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Measured bioactive substance intake FH-1.4.2.2 13130 ❑ Monounsaturated fat measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.5 11442
❑ Plant stanol ester measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.2.1 11423 hours
❑ Plant sterol ester measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.2.2 11425 ❑ Omega 3 fatty acid measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.6 11444
hours
❑ Soy protein measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.2.3 11427
❑ Alpha linolenic acid measured intake in FH-1.5.1.2.6.1 11446
❑ Psyllium measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.2.4 11429
24 hours
❑ Beta glucan measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.2.2.5 11431
❑ Eicosapentaenoic acid measured intake in FH-1.5.1.2.6.2 11448
❑ Food additive intake (specify) FH-1.4.2.3 10038 24 hours
❑ High intensity sweetener additive intake FH-1.4.2.3.1 14067 ❑ Docosahexaenoic acid measured intake in FH-1.5.1.2.6.3 11450
❑ Excessive high intensity sweetener FH-1.4.2.3.1.1 14068 24 hours
additive intake ❑ Essential fatty acid measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.7 11452
Caffeine intake (1.4.3) hours
❑ Total caffeine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.3.1 11432 ❑ Medium chain triglyceride measured intake in FH-1.5.1.2.8 11454
24 hours
❑ Total caffeine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.4.3.2 10041
❑ Fat measured intake in one meal FH-1.5.1.2.9 14072
Macronutrient Intake (1.5)
❑ Percent saturated fat measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.10 14073
Fat and cholesterol, protein, carbohydrate, and fiber
intake from all sources including food, beverages, ❑ Fat measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.11 14074
supplements, and via enteral and parenteral routes. hours
Fat intake (1.5.1) ❑ Fat measured intake from enteral nutrition in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.12 14075
hours
❑ Estimated fat intake FH-1.5.1.1 13131
❑ Fat measured intake from parenteral nutrition in FH-1.5.1.2.13 14076
❑ Total fat estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.1 11433
24 hours
❑ Saturated fat estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.2 11435
❑ Fat measured intake from intravenous fluids in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.14 14077
❑ Trans fatty acid estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.3 11437 hours
❑ Polyunsaturated fat estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.4 11439 ❑ Fat additive measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.15 14078
hours ❑ Percent fat measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.16 14217
❑ Linoleic acid estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.4.1 11602 Cholesterol intake (1.5.2)
❑ Monounsaturated fat estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.5 11441 ❑ Cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.2.1 11455
hours
❑ Cholesterol measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.2.2 11456
❑ Omega 3 fatty acid estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.6 11443
Protein intake (1.5.3)
hours
❑ Estimated protein intake FH-1.5.3.1 13133
❑ Alpha linolenic acid estimated intake in FH-1.5.1.1.6.1 11445
24 hours ❑ Total protein estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.1 11457
❑ Eicosapentaenoic acid estimated intake in FH-1.5.1.1.6.2 11447 ❑ High biological value protein estimated intake FH-1.5.3.1.2 11459
24 hours in 24 hours
❑ Docosahexaenoic acid estimated intake in FH-1.5.1.1.6.3 11449 ❑ Casein estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.3 11461
24 hours ❑ Whey estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.4 11463
❑ Essential fatty acid estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.7 11451 ❑ Gluten estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.5 11465
hours ❑ Protein estimated intake per kg in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.6 11467
❑ Medium chain triglyceride estimated intake in FH-1.5.1.1.8 11453 ❑ Natural protein estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.7 11610
24 hours
❑ Protein estimated intake in one meal FH-1.5.3.1.8 14079
❑ Fat estimated intake in one meal FH-1.5.1.1.9 14069
❑ Percent protein estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.9 14080
❑ Percent saturated fat estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.10 14070
❑ Protein estimated intake from oral nutrition in FH-1.5.3.1.10 13003
hours
24 hours
❑ Fat estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 FH-1.5.1.1.11 13000
❑ Protein estimated intake from enteral nutrition FH-1.5.3.1.11 13004
hours
in 24 hours
❑ Fat estimated intake from enteral nutrition in FH-1.5.1.1.12 12014
❑ Protein additive estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.1.12 14081
24 hours
❑ Measured protein intake FH-1.5.3.2 13134
❑ Fat estimated intake from parenteral nutrition FH-1.5.1.1.13 13001
in 24 hours ❑ Total protein measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.1 11458
❑ Fat estimated intake from intravenous fluids in FH-1.5.1.1.14 13002 ❑ High biological value protein measured intake FH-1.5.3.2.2 11460
24 hours in 24 hours
❑ Fat additive estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.15 14071 ❑ Casein measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.3 11462
❑ Percent fat estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.1.16 14216 ❑ Whey measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.4 11464
❑ Measured fat intake FH-1.5.1.2 13132 ❑ Gluten measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.5 11466
❑ Total fat measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.1 11434 ❑ Protein measured intake per kg in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.6 11468
❑ Saturated fat measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.2 11436 ❑ Natural protein measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.7 14082
❑ Trans fatty acid measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.3 11438 ❑ Protein measured intake in one meal FH-1.5.3.2.8 14083
❑ Polyunsaturated fat measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.1.2.4 11440 ❑ Percent protein measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.9 14212
hours ❑ Protein measured intake from oral nutrition in FH-1.5.3.2.10 14084
❑ Linoleic acid measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.1.2.4.1 13225 24 hours
3
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Protein measured intake from enteral nutrition FH-1.5.3.2.11 14085 ❑ Simple carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.3 11628
in 24 hours hours
❑ Protein additive measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.3.2.12 14087 ❑ Galactose estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.1.4 11629
Amino acid intake (1.5.4) ❑ Lactose estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.1.5 11630
❑ Estimated amino acid intake FH-1.5.4.1 13135 ❑ Fructose estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.1.6 11631
❑ Total amino acid estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.1 10057 ❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake per kg in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.7 14088
❑ Essential amino acid estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.4.1.2 10058 hours
hours ❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake in one meal FH-1.5.5.1.8 14089
❑ Histidine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.1 11612 ❑ Percent carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.9 14090
❑ Methionine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.2 11613 hours
❑ Isoleucine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.3 11614 ❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake from oral FH-1.5.5.1.10 12143
nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Leucine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.4 11615
❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake from enteral FH-1.5.5.1.11 12011
❑ Lysine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.5 11616
nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Threonine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.6 11617
❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake from parenteral FH-1.5.5.1.12 11180
❑ Tryptophan estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.7 11618 nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Phenylalanine estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.4.1.2.8 11619 ❑ Carbohydrate estimated intake from FH-1.5.5.1.13 11240
hours intravenous fluids in 24 hours
❑ Valine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.2.9 11620 ❑ Carbohydrate additive estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.14 14091
❑ Nonessential amino acid estimated intake in FH-1.5.4.1.3 11621 hours
24 hours ❑ Estimated daily glycemic index value FH-1.5.5.2 12013
❑ Arginine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.3.1 11622
❑ Estimated daily glycemic load FH-1.5.5.3 12142
❑ Glutamine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.3.2 11623
❑ Insulin to carbohydrate ratio FH-1.5.5.4 10066
❑ Homocysteine estimated intake in 24 FH- 11624
❑ Measured carbohydrate intake FH-1.5.5.5 13154
hours 1.5.4.1.3.3
❑ Total carbohydrate measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.1 13155
❑ Tyramine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.3.4 11625 hours
❑ Tyrosine estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.1.3.5 11626 ❑ Complex carbohydrate measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.2 13156
❑ Measured amino acid intake FH-1.5.4.2 13226 hours
❑ Total amino acid measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.1 13137 ❑ Simple carbohydrate measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.3 13157
❑ Essential amino acid measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.4.2.2 13138 hours
hours ❑ Galactose measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.5.4 13158
❑ Histidine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.1 13139 ❑ Lactose measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.5.5 13159
❑ Methionine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.2 13140 ❑ Fructose measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.5.5.6 13160
❑ Isoleucine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.3 13141 ❑ Carbohydrate measured intake per kg in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.7 14092
❑ Leucine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.4 13142 hours
❑ Lysine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.5 13143 ❑ Carbohydrate measured intake in one meal FH-1.5.5.5.8 14093
❑ Threonine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.6 13144 ❑ Percent carbohydrate measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.9 14094
hours
❑ Tryptophan measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.7 13145
❑ Phenylalanine measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.4.2.2.8 13146 ❑ Carbohydrate measured intake from oral FH-1.5.5.5.10 14095
hours nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Valine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.2.9 13147 ❑ Carbohydrate measured intake from enteral FH-1.5.5.5.11 14096
nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Nonessential amino acid measured intake in FH-1.5.4.2.3 13148
24 hours ❑ Carbohydrate measured intake from parenteral FH-1.5.5.5.12 14097
nutrition in 24 hours
❑ Arginine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.3.1 13136
❑ Carbohydrate measured intake from FH-1.5.5.5.13 14098
❑ Glutamine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.3.2 13149
intravenous fluids in 24 hours
❑ Homocysteine measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.4.2.3.3 13150
❑ Carbohydrate additive measured intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.5.14 14099
hours
hours
❑ Tyramine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.3.4 13151
Fiber intake (1.5.6)
❑ Tyrosine measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.4.2.3.5 13152
❑ Estimated fiber intake FH-1.5.6.1 13161
❑ Amino acids from enteral nutrition FH-1.5.4.2.4 13005
❑ Total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.1.1 10068
❑ Amino acids from parenteral nutrition FH-1.5.4.2.5 13006
❑ Soluble fiber estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.1.2 10069
❑ Amino acids from intravenous fluids FH-1.5.4.2.6 13007
❑ Insoluble fiber estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.1.3 10070
Carbohydrate intake (1.5.5)
❑ Fiber estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 FH-1.5.6.1.4 14213
❑ Estimated carbohydrate intake FH-1.5.5.1 13153 hours
❑ Total carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.1 10060 ❑ Fiber estimated intake from enteral nutrition in FH-1.5.6.1.5 14100
hours 24 hours
❑ Complex carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 FH-1.5.5.1.2 11627 ❑ Fiber additive estimated intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.1.6 14214
hours
❑ Measured fiber intake FH-1.5.6.2 11519
4
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Total fiber measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.2.1 13162 ❑ Sodium estimated intake in 24 hours (7) 10095
❑ Soluble fiber measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.2.2 13163 ❑ Zinc estimated intake in 24 hours (8) 10096
❑ Insoluble fiber measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.2.3 13164 ❑ Sulfate estimated intake in 24 hours (9) 10097
❑ Fiber measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 FH-1.5.6.2.4 14101
❑ Fluoride estimated intake in 24 hours (10) 10098
hours
❑ Copper estimated intake in 24 hours (11) 10099
❑ Fiber measured intake from enteral nutrition in FH-1.5.6.2.5 14102
24 hours ❑ Iodine estimated intake in 24 hours (12) 10100
❑ Fiber additive measured intake in 24 hours FH-1.5.6.1.6 14103 ❑ Selenium estimated intake in 24 hours (13) 10101
Micronutrient Intake (1.6) ❑ Manganese estimated intake in 24 hours (14) 10102
Vitamin and mineral intake from all sources, including ❑ Chromium estimated intake in 24 hours (15) 10103
food, beverages, supplements, and via enteral and
parenteral routes. ❑ Molybdenum estimated intake in 24 hours (16) 10104
❑ Chloride estimated intake in 24 hours (2) 10090 Food and Nutrient Administration (2)
❑ Iron estimated intake in 24 hours (3) 10091 Current and previous diets and/or food modifications,
eating environment, and enteral and parenteral
❑ Magnesium estimated intake in 24 hours (4) 10092 nutrition administration.
❑ Potassium estimated intake in 24 hours (5) 10093 Diet History (2.1)
❑ Phosphorus estimated intake in 24 hours (6) 10094
5
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
Description of food and drink regularly provided or ❑ Nutrition skill of the community FH-4.2.1 13207
consumed, past diets followed or prescribed and ❑ Nutrition skill of supportive individuals FH-4.2.2 13208
counseling received, and the eating environment.
❑ Nutrition skill of individual client FH-4.2.3 13209
Diet order (2.1.1)
Beliefs and attitudes (4.3)
❑ General, healthful diet order FH-2.1.1.1 10113
❑ Nutrition priority of individual client FH-4.3.1 14508
❑ Modified diet order FH-2.1.1.2 10114
❑ Nutrition priority of client’s supportive FH-4.3.2 14509
❑ Enteral nutrition order FH-2.1.1.3 10115 individuals
❑ Parenteral nutrition order FH-2.1.1.4 10116 ❑ Nutrition priority of client’s supportive structures FH-4.3.3 14510
Diet experience (2.1.2) ❑ Nutrition priority of client’s stakeholders FH-4.3.4 14511
❑ Previously prescribed diets FH-2.1.2.1 10118 ❑ Conflict with individual client’s value system FH-4.3.5 14512
❑ Previous diet/nutrition education/counseling FH-2.1.2.2 10119 ❑ Conflict with client’s supportive individuals’ FH-4.3.6 14513
value system
❑ Self selected diet/s followed FH-2.1.2.3 10120
❑ Conflict with client’s supportive structures’ value FH-4.3.7 14514
❑ Dieting attempts FH-2.1.2.4 10121
system
❑ Food allergies FH-2.1.2.5 10805
❑ Conflict with client’s stakeholders’ value system FH-4.3.8 14515
❑ Food intolerance FH-2.1.2.6 10806 ❑ Behavioral beliefs FH-4.3.9 14516
Eating environment (2.1.3) ❑ Perceived susceptibility to nutrition related FH-4.3.9.1 14517
❑ Location FH-2.1.3.1 10123 health problems score
❑ Atmosphere FH-2.1.3.2 10124 ❑ Perceived severity of risk to health score FH-4.3.9.2 14518
❑ Caregiver/companion FH-2.1.3.3 10125 ❑ Perceived benefit of nutrition related change FH-4.3.9.3 14519
score
❑ Appropriate breastfeeding FH-2.1.3.4 10126
accommodations/facility ❑ Likelihood of performing nutrition related FH-4.3.9.4 14520
behavior score
❑ Eats alone FH-2.1.3.5 10127
❑ Perceived control over nutrition related FH-4.3.9.5 14521
Enteral and parenteral nutrition administration behavior score
(2.1.4)
❑ Nutrition self efficacy score FH-4.3.9.6 14522
❑ Enteral access FH-2.1.4.1 10129
❑ Perceived barrier to nutrition related behavior FH-4.3.9.7 14523
❑ Parenteral access FH-2.1.4.2 10130 score
❑ Body position, EN FH-2.1.4.3 10804 ❑ Readiness to change nutrition related behavior FH-4.3.9.8 10151
Fasting (2.1.5) stage
❑ Fasting pattern in one calendar day, reported FH-2.1.5.1 11633 ❑ Precontemplation stage for readiness to FH-4.3.9.8.1 14524
change
❑ Fasting pattern in one calendar week, reported FH-2.1.5.2 11634
❑ Contemplation stage for readiness to FH-4.3.9.8.2 14525
❑ Fasting pattern in one calendar month, reported FH-2.1.5.3 11635
change
❑ Fasting pattern in one calendar year, reported FH-2.1.5.4 11636
❑ Preparation stage for readiness to change FH-4.3.9.8.3 14526
❑ Fasting tolerance, reported FH-2.1.5.5 11637
❑ Action stage for readiness to change FH-4.3.9.8.4 14527
Medication and Complementary/Alternative ❑ Maintenance stage for readiness to change FH-4.3.9.8.5 14528
Medicine Use (3) ❑ Relapse stage for readiness to change FH-4.3.9.8.6 14529
Prescription and over the counter medications, ❑ Readiness to change nutrition related behavior FH-4.3.9.9 14590
including herbal preparations and score
complementary/alternative medicine products used.
❑ Negative emotions about food and nutrition FH-4.3.10 14530
Medications (3.1)
❑ Positive emotions about food and nutrition FH-4.3.11 14531
❑ Prescription medication use FH-3.1.1 10820
❑ Unrealistic nutrition related goals FH-4.3.12 10154
❑ Insulin sensitivity factor FH-3.1.1.1 11241
❑ Unscientific nutrition beliefs FH-4.3.13 14532
❑ Over the counter (OTC) medication use FH-3.1.2 10134
❑ Body image disturbance FH-4.3.14 10146
❑ Misuse of medication FH-3.1.3 10135
❑ Preoccupation with food FH-4.3.15 10149
Complementary/Alternative Medicine (3.2)
❑ Preoccupation with weight FH-4.3.16 10150
❑ Nutrition related complementary/alternative FH-3.2.1 10137
❑ Preoccupation with body shape FH-4.3.17 14533
medicine use
❑ Negative nutrition self talk FH-4.3.18 14534
Knowledge/Beliefs/Attitudes (4)
❑ Positive nutrition self talk FH-4.3.19 14535
Understanding of nutrition-related concepts and
conviction of the truth and feelings/emotions toward ❑ Preferences for food FH-4.3.20 10156
some nutrition-related statement or phenomenon, along ❑ Preferences for beverages FH-4.3.21 14537
with readiness to change nutrition-related behaviors. Behavior (5)
Food and nutrition knowledge(4.1) Client activities and actions, which influence
❑ Nutrition knowledge of community FH-4.1.1 13204 achievement of nutrition related goals.
❑ Nutrition knowledge of supportive individuals FH-4.1.2 13205 Adherence (5.1)
❑ Nutrition knowledge of individual client FH-4.1.3 13206 ❑ Self reported nutrition adherence score FH-5.1.1 10160
Food and nutrition skill (4.2) ❑ Nutrition encounter ratio FH-5.1.2 14215
6
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Ability to recall nutrition goals FH-5.1.3 10162 ❑ Access to assistive food preparation devices FH-6.4.3 10203
❑ Nutrition self monitoring at agreed upon rate FH-5.1.4 10163 Food and nutrition sanitation (6.5)
❑ Nutrition self management as agreed upon FH-5.1.5 10164 ❑ Availability of suitable sanitation facilities FH-6.5.1 14551
Avoidance behavior (5.2) ❑ Ability to wash hands with soap and water FH-6.5.2 14552
❑ Avoidance FH-5.2.1 10166 Physical Activity and Function (7)
❑ Restrictive eating FH-5.2.2 10167 Physical activity, cognitive and physical ability to
engage in specific tasks, eg, breastfeeding and self-
❑ Cause of avoidance behavior FH-5.2.3 10168
feeding.
Bingeing and purging behavior (5.3)
Breastfeeding Assessment (7.1)
❑ Binge eating behavior FH-5.3.1 10170
❑ Initiation of breastfeeding FH-7.1.1 10206
❑ Purging behavior FH-5.3.2 10171
❑ Start breastfeeding FH-7.1.1.1 14108
Mealtime behavior (5.4)
❑ Stop breastfeeding FH-7.1.1.2 14109
❑ Meal duration FH-5.4.1 10173
❑ Breastfeeding approach FH-7.1.2 14110
❑ Percent of meal time spent eating FH-5.4.2 10174
❑ Exclusive breastfeeding FH-7.1.2.1 10208
❑ Preference to drink rather than eat FH-5.4.3 10175 ❑ Predominant breastfeeding FH-7.1.2.2 14111
❑ Refusal to eat/chew FH-5.4.4 10176 ❑ Partial breastfeeding FH-7.1.2.3 14112
❑ Spitting food out FH-5.4.5 10177 ❑ Breastfeeding difficulties FH-7.1.3 10209
❑ Rumination FH-5.4.6 10178 ❑ Infant able to latch on to breast for FH-7.1.3.1 14113
❑ Patient/client/caregiver fatigue during feeding FH-5.4.7 10179 feeding
process resulting in inadequate intake ❑ Infant unable to latch on to breast for FH-7.1.3.2 14114
❑ Willingness to try new foods FH-5.4.8 10180 feeding
❑ Limited number of accepted foods FH-5.4.9 10181 ❑ Difficulty latching onto breast for feeding FH-7.1.3.3 14115
❑ Abscess of breast associated with FH-7.1.3.4 14116
❑ Rigid sensory preferences FH-5.4.10 10182
lactation
Social network (5.5)
❑ Cracked nipple associated with lactation FH-7.1.3.5 14117
❑ Ability to build and utilize social network FH-5.5.1 10184
❑ Infection of nipple associated with FH-7.1.3.6 14118
Factors Affecting Access to Food and lactation
Food/Nutrition Related Supplies (6) ❑ Non purulent mastitis associated with FH-7.1.3.7 14119
Factors that affect intake and availability of a sufficient lactation
quantity of safe, healthful food as well as food/nutrition- ❑ Retracted nipple associated with lactation FH-7.1.3.8 14120
related supplies.
❑ Inversion of nipple associated with FH-7.1.3.9 14121
Food and nutrition program participation (6.1) lactation
❑ Eligibility for government nutrition programs FH-6.1.1 10187 ❑ Breast engorgement associated with FH-7.1.3.10 14122
❑ Enrollment in government nutrition programs FH-6.1.2 14538 lactation
❑ Eligibility for community nutrition programs FH-6.1.3 10189 ❑ Previous breast surgery associated with FH-7.1.3.11 14123
lactation
❑ Enrollment in community nutrition programs FH-6.1.4 14539
❑ Breast abnormality associated with FH-7.1.3.12 14124
❑ Awareness of programs offering food support and FH-6.1.5 14540 lactation
nutrition intervention
❑ Inadequate flow of breastmilk FH-7.1.3.13 14125
Safe food availability (6.2)
❑ Finding related to infant’s ability to suck FH-7.1.4 14126
❑ Availability of shopping facilities FH-6.2.1 10192
❑ Infant able to suck FH-7.1.4.1 14127
❑ Ability to procure safe food FH-6.2.2 10800
❑ Infant unable to suck FH-7.1.4.2 14128
❑ Access to food preparation equipment FH-6.2.3 14541 ❑ Difficulty sucking FH-7.1.4.3 14129
❑ Availability of food refrigeration FH-6.2.4 14542 Nutrition related ADLs and IADLs (7.2)
❑ Ability to store food safely FH-6.2.5 14543 ❑ Physical ability to complete tasks for meal FH-7.2.1 10211
❑ Ability to identify safe food FH-6.2.6 10801 preparation
❑ Individual client food security level FH-6.2.7 14544 ❑ Physical ability to self feed FH-7.2.2 10212
❑ Household food security level FH-6.2.8 14545 ❑ Ability to position self in relation to plate FH-7.2.3 10213
❑ Situational food insecurity FH-6.2.9 14546 ❑ Receives assistance with intake FH-7.2.4 10214
❑ Chronic food insecurity FH-6.2.10 14547 ❑ Ability to use adaptive eating devices FH-7.2.5 10215
Safe water availability (6.3) ❑ Cognitive ability to complete tasks for meal FH-7.2.6 10216
❑ Availability of potable water FH-6.3.1 10198 preparation
❑ Ability to decontaminate water FH-6.3.2 14548 ❑ Remembers to eat FH-7.2.7 10139
❑ Awareness of public health water alert FH-6.3.3 14549 ❑ Recalls eating FH-7.2.8 10218
Food and nutrition related supplies availability ❑ Mini mental state examination score FH-7.2.9 10219
(6.4) ❑ Nutrition related activities of daily living (ADL) FH-7.2.10 10220
❑ Access to food and nutrition related supplies FH-6.4.1 10201 score
❑ Access to assistive eating devices FH-6.4.2 10202
7
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Nutrition related instrumental activities of daily FH-7.2.11 10221 ❑ Stated prepregnancy weight AD-1.1.2.8 12036
living (IADL) score ❑ Dosing weight AD-1.1.2.9 12037
Physical activity (7.3) ❑ Estimated dry weight AD-1.1.2.10 12038
❑ Physical activity history FH-7.3.1 10223 ❑ Preamputation measured weight AD-1.1.2.11 12039
❑ Consistency FH-7.3.2 10224 ❑ Preamputation estimated weight AD-1.1.2.12 12040
❑ Frequency FH-7.3.3 10225 ❑ Postamputation measured weight AD-1.1.2.13 12041
❑ Duration FH-7.3.4 10226 ❑ Postamputation estimated weight AD-1.1.2.14 12042
❑ Intensity FH-7.3.5 10227 ❑ Predialysis weight AD-1.1.2.15 12043
❑ Type of physical activity FH-7.3.6 10228 ❑ Postdialysis weight AD-1.1.2.16 12044
❑ Strength FH-7.3.7 10229 ❑ Frame AD-1.1.3 10241
❑ Handgrip strength FH-7.3.7.1 11680 ❑ Frame size AD-1.1.3.1 12045
❑ TV/screen time FH-7.3.8 10230 ❑ Wrist circumference AD-1.1.3.2 12046
❑ Other sedentary activity time FH-7.3.9 10231 ❑ Weight change AD-1.1.4 10242
❑ Involuntary physical movement FH-7.3.10 10232 ❑ Weight gain AD-1.1.4.1 12047
❑ Non exercise activity thermogenesis FH-7.3.11 10233 ❑ Weight loss AD-1.1.4.2 12048
Factors affecting access to physical activity (7.4) ❑ Weight change percentage AD-1.1.4.3 12049
❑ Neighborhood safety FH-7.4.1 10822 ❑ Measured interdialytic weight gain AD-1.1.4.4 12050
❑ Walkability of neighborhood FH-7.4.2 10823 ❑ Measured interdialytic weight loss AD-1.1.4.5 12051
❑ Proximity to parks/green space FH-7.4.3 10824 ❑ Measured gestational weight gain AD-1.1.4.6 12052
❑ Access to physical activity facilities/programs FH-7.4.4 10825 ❑ Measured gestational weight loss AD-1.1.4.7 12053
Nutrition Related Patient/Client Centered ❑ Weight change intent AD-1.1.4.8 12054
Measures (8) ❑ Body mass AD-1.1.5 10243
Patient/client’s perception of his or her nutrition ❑ Body mass index (BMI) AD-1.1.5.1 12055
intervention and its impact on life. ❑ Body mass index prime ratio (BMI prime) AD-1.1.5.2 12056
Nutrition quality of life (8.1) ❑ Growth pattern indices AD-1.1.6 10244
❑ Nutrition quality of life responses FH-8.1.1 10236 ❑ BMI for age percentile AD-1.1.6.1 12057
❑ BMI for age z score AD-1.1.6.2 12058
ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS ❑ Head circumference AD-1.1.6.3 12059
(AD) ❑ Birth head circumference AD-1.1.6.4 12060
Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), growth pattern ❑ Head circumference for age percentile AD-1.1.6.5 12061
indices/percentile ranks, and weight history. ❑ Head circumference for age z score AD-1.1.6.6 12062
Body composition/growth/weight history (1.1) ❑ Length for age percentile AD-1.1.6.7 12063
❑ Height AD-1.1.1 10239 ❑ Length for age z score AD-1.1.6.8 12064
❑ Measured height AD-1.1.1.1 11377 ❑ Stature for age percentile AD-1.1.6.9 12065
❑ Measured length AD-1.1.1.2 12015 ❑ Stature for age z score AD-1.1.6.10 12066
❑ Birth length AD-1.1.1.3 12016 ❑ Weight for length percentile AD-1.1.6.11 12067
❑ Preamputation measured height AD-1.1.1.4 12017 ❑ Weight for length z score AD-1.1.6.12 12068
❑ Preamputation estimated height AD-1.1.1.5 12018 ❑ Weight for age percentile AD-1.1.6.13 12069
❑ Estimated height AD-1.1.1.6 12019 ❑ Weight for age z score AD-1.1.6.14 12070
❑ Stated height AD-1.1.1.7 12020 ❑ Weight for stature percentile AD-1.1.6.15 12071
❑ Measured peak adult height AD-1.1.1.8 12021 ❑ Weight for stature z score AD-1.1.6.16 12072
❑ Stated peak adult height AD-1.1.1.9 12022 ❑ Mid parental height comparator AD-1.1.6.17 12073
❑ Knee height AD-1.1.1.10 12023 ❑ Body compartment estimates AD-1.1.7 10245
❑ Tibia length AD-1.1.1.11 12024 ❑ Body fat percentage AD-1.1.7.1 12074
❑ Arm span AD-1.1.1.12 12025 ❑ Body fat percentage technique AD-1.1.7.2 12075
❑ Arm demispan AD-1.1.1.13 12026 ❑ Body surface area AD-1.1.7.3 12076
❑ Arm halfspan AD-1.1.1.14 12027 ❑ Calculated body surface area AD-1.1.7.4 12077
❑ Height measurement device AD-1.1.1.15 12028 ❑ Bone age AD-1.1.7.5 12078
❑ Weight AD-1.1.2 10240 ❑ Bone mineral density t score AD-1.1.7.6 12079
❑ Measured weight AD-1.1.2.1 12029 ❑ Bone mineral density z score AD-1.1.7.7 12080
❑ Stated weight AD-1.1.2.2 12030 ❑ Bone mineral density technique AD-1.1.7.8 12081
❑ Stated peak weight AD-1.1.2.3 12031 ❑ Mid arm muscle circumference AD-1.1.7.9 12082
❑ Measured peak weight AD-1.1.2.4 12032 ❑ Mid arm muscle circumference percentile AD-1.1.7.10 12083
❑ Usual stated body weight (UBW) AD-1.1.2.5 12033 ❑ Triceps skinfold thickness AD-1.1.7.11 12084
❑ UBW percentage AD-1.1.2.6 12034 ❑ Triceps skinfold percentile AD-1.1.7.12 12085
❑ Birth weight AD-1.1.2.7 12035 ❑ Triceps skinfold z score AD-1.1.7.13 12086
8
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
9
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Prealbumin BD-1.11.2 10338 ❑ Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (IgG) BD-1.11.58 11270
10
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Urine 2 oxoisovalerate BD-1.12.24 11220 ❑ Fatty acid panel mitochondrial C8 to C18 BD-1.15.6 11235
❑ Urine galactitol BD-1.12.25 11221 ❑ Fatty acid panel essential C12 to C22 BD-1.15.7 11236
❑ Urine reducing substances BD-1.12.26 11222 ❑ Fatty acid panel peroxisomal C22 to C26 BD-1.15.8 11237
❑ Urine porphyrins BD-1.12.27 11274 ❑ MCAD enzyme assay in fibroblasts or other BD-1.15.9 11238
❑ Urine creatinine, 24 hour BD-1.12.28 14189 tissues
❑ Urine citrate, 24 hours BD-1.12.29 14190 ❑ Fatty acid beta oxidation in fibroblasts BD-1.15.10 11239
❑ Urine phosphorus, 24 hour BD-1.12.30 14191
❑ Urine pH, random BD-1.12.31 14192 NUTRITION-FOCUSED PHYSICAL
❑ Urine pH, 24 hour BD-1.12.32 14193 FINDINGS (PD)
❑ Urine sodium, 24 hour BD-1.12.33 14194 Findings from a nutrition-focused physical exam,
❑ Urine urea nitrogen, 24 hour BD-1.12.34 14195 interview, or the medical record including muscle and
subcutaneous fat, oral health, suck/swallow/breathe
❑ Urine oxalate, 24 hour BD-1.12.35 14196
ability, appetite, and affect.
❑ Urine chloride, 24 hour BD-1.12.36 14197
Nutrition-focused physical findings (1.1)
❑ Urine ammonium, 24 hour BD-1.12.37 14198
❑ Overall findings (1)
❑ Urine magnesium, 24 hour BD-1.12.38 14199
❑ Asthenia PD-1.1.1.1 11646
❑ Urine potassium, 24 hour BD-1.12.39 14200
❑ Buffalo hump PD-1.1.1.2 11647
❑ Urine sulfate, 24 hour BD-1.12.40 14201
❑ Cachexia PD-1.1.1.3 11648
❑ Urine cystine, 24 hour BD-1.12.41 14202
❑ Cushingoid appearance PD-1.1.1.4 11649
❑ Calcium oxalate supersaturation in 24 hour urine BD-1.12.42 14203
❑ Ectomorph PD-1.1.1.5 11650
❑ Calcium phosphate supersaturation in 24 hour BD-1.12.43 14204
❑ Endomorph PD-1.1.1.6 11651
urine
❑ Lethargic PD-1.1.1.7 11652
❑ Brushite supersaturation in 24 hour urine BD-1.12.44 14205
❑ Mesomorph PD-1.1.1.8 11653
❑ Uric acid supersaturation in 24 hour urine BD-1.12.45 14218
❑ Neglect of personal hygiene PD-1.1.1.9 11654
Vitamin profile (1.13)
❑ Obese PD-1.1.1.10 11655
❑ Vitamin A, serum or plasma retinol BD-1.13.1 10351
❑ Short stature for age PD-1.1.1.11 11656
❑ Vitamin C, plasma or serum BD-1.13.2 10352
❑ Tall stature PD-1.1.1.12 11657
❑ Vitamin D, 25 hydroxy BD-1.13.3 10353
❑ Body language that may suggest discomfort PD-1.1.1.13 14553
❑ Vitamin E, plasma alpha-tocopherol BD-1.13.4 10354
with interaction
❑ Thiamin, activity coefficient for erythrocyte BD-1.13.5 10355
❑ Adipose (2)
transketolase activity
❑ Atrophy of orbital fat PD-1.1.2.1 11659
❑ Riboflavin, activity coefficient for erythrocyte BD-1.13.6 10356
glutathione reductase activity ❑ Excess subcutaneous fat PD-1.1.2.2 11660
❑ Niacin, urinary N’methyl-nicotinamide BD-1.13.7 10357 ❑ Loss of subcutaneous fat PD-1.1.2.3 11661
concentration ❑ Central adiposity PD-1.1.2.4 11662
❑ Vitamin B6, plasma or serum pyridoxal BD-1.13.8 10358 ❑ Loss of subcutaneous triceps fat PD-1.1.2.5 12095
5’phosphate concentration ❑ Loss of subcutaneous biceps fat PD-1.1.2.6 12096
❑ Pantothenic acid, urinary pantothenate excretion, BD-1.13.9 10850 ❑ Loss of subcutaneous fat overlying the ribs PD-1.1.2.7 12097
plasma
❑ Lipodystrophy PD-1.1.2.8 14554
❑ Biotin, urinary 3 hydroxyisovaleric acid excretion BD-1.13.10 11275
❑ Bones (3)
❑ Biotin, lymphocyte propionyl CoA carboxylase in BD-1.13.11 11276
❑ Bow legs PD-1.1.3.1 11664
pregnancy, serum
❑ Frontal bossing PD-1.1.3.2 11665
❑ Biotinidase BD-1.13.12 11223
❑ Harrison’s sulcus PD-1.1.3.3 11666
❑ Protein induced by vitamin K absence or BD-1.13.13 11224
antagonist II ❑ Rachitic rosary PD-1.1.3.4 11667
11
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
12
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
13
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
14
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
Household food security assessment tool scores Estimated fluid needs (3.1)
(2) ❑ Total fluid estimated needs CS-3.1.1 10440
❑ US household food security module: six item AT-2.1 14137 ❑ Method for estimating needs CS-3.1.2 10441
short form raw score
Micronutrient Needs (4)
❑ US household food security module: six item AT-2.2 14138
Estimated vitamin needs (4.1)
short form scale score
❑ Food insecurity experience scale (FIES) raw AT-2.3 14139 ❑ A (1) 10444
score ❑ C (2) 10445
Food variety assessment tool scores (3) ❑ D (3) 10446
❑ Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-W) AT-3.1 14141 ❑ E (4) 10447
indicator score
❑ K (5) 10448
Physiologic metabolic etiology EY-1.5 14571 ❑ Method for estimating needs (14) 10458
❑ Total fat estimated needs in 24 hours CS-2.1.1 12206 ❑ Iodine (12) 10473
❑ Fat estimated needs per kg of body weight CS-2.1.2 13010 ❑ Selenium (13) 10474
❑ Method for estimating total fat needs CS-2.1.3 10425 ❑ Manganese (14) 10475
❑ Proportion of energy needs from fat in 24 hours CS-2.1.4 13009 ❑ Chromium (15) 10476
Estimated protein needs (2.2) ❑ Molybdenum (16) 10477
❑ Total protein estimated needs in 24 hours CS-2.2.1 12207 ❑ Boron (17) 10478
❑ Protein estimated needs per kg of body weight CS-2.2.2 13011 ❑ Cobalt (18) 10479
❑ Method for estimating total protein needs CS-2.2.3 10429 ❑ Method for estimating needs (19) 10480
❑ Proportion of energy needs from protein in 24 CS-2.2.4 13012
Weight and Growth Recommendation (5)
hours
Recommended body weight/body mass
Estimated carbohydrate needs (2.3)
index/growth (5.1)
❑ Total carbohydrate estimated needs in 24 hours CS-2.3.1 12208
❑ Ideal/reference body weight (IBW) CS-5.1.1 10483
❑ Carbohydrate estimated needs per kg of body CS-2.3.2 13013
❑ Recommended body mass index (BMI) CS-5.1.2 10484
weight
❑ Goal weight CS-5.1.3 12144
❑ Method for estimating total carbohydrate needs CS-2.3.3 10433
❑ Goal weight gain/day CS-5.1.4 12145
❑ Proportion of energy needs from carbohydrate in CS-2.3.4 13014
24 hours ❑ Goal weight for length z score CS-5.1.5 12146
Estimated fiber needs (2.4) ❑ Goal mid upper arm circumference z score CS-5.1.6 12147
❑ Total fiber estimated needs in 24 hours CS-2.4.1 12209 ❑ Goal BMI for age z score CS-5.1.7 12148
❑ Percent median BMI CS-5.1.8 12149
❑ Method for estimating total fiber needs CS-2.4.2 10437
Fluid Needs (3) PROGRESS EVALUATION (EV)
16
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring and Evaluation Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
Evaluation of progress toward a nutrition related ❑ Some progress toward goal EV-1.5 14583
goal(s) and resolution of a nutrition diagnosis(es). ❑ Some digression away from goal EV-1.6 14584
Intervention goal status (1) Nutrition diagnosis status (2)
❑ New goal identified EV-1.1 14579 ❑ New nutrition diagnosis EV-2.1 14586
❑ Goal achieved EV-1.2 14580 ❑ Active nutrition diagnosis EV-2.2 14587
❑ Goal discontinued EV-1.3 14581 ❑ Resolved nutrition diagnosis EV-2.3 14588
❑ Goal not achieved EV-1.4 14582 ❑ Discontinued nutrition diagnosis EV-2.4 14589
17
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021
12/15/21, 9:10 AM Energy Intake
ENERGY INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total energy estimated intake in 24 hours (calories, kcal or kJ/day) - defined as the approximate intake in
one day of all energy
Energy estimated intake per kg in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/kg/day)—defined as the approximate
intake per kg of body weight in one day of all energy
Energy estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
estimated intake of energy in one day derived from oral intake
Energy estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
estimated intake of energy in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Energy estimated intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
estimated intake of energy in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Energy estimated intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
estimated intake of energy in one day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Total energy measured intake in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake in one day of all energy
Energy measured intake per kg in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/kg/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake per kg of body weight in one day of all energy
Energy measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the known
quantity of energy in one day derived from oral intake
Energy measured intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
known quantity of energy in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Energy measured intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
known quantity of energy in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Energy measured intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (calories, kcal, or kJ/day)—defined as the
known quantity of energy in one day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Note: Weight and weight change can be found on the Body Composition/Growth/Weight History reference
sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, 3 to 5 day food diary, food frequency questionnaire, caretaker intake records, menu analysis,
intake and output records
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-1-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:10 AM Energy Intake
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate energy intake, excessive energy intake, malnutrition (undernutrition), inadequate protein
energy intake, underweight, unintended weight loss, overweight/obesity, unintended weight gain, swallowing
difficulty, breastfeeding difficulty, altered GI function, limited adherence to nutrition related recommendations
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Total energy estimated intake in 24 hours (kcal/day)
1. Reference Standard: Food diary indicates that client consumes approximately 2600 calories/kcal (11,000
kJ) per day. 145% of estimated energy needs per day.
2. Recommendation: Client’s recommended calorie intake level is 1,800-2,000 calories/kcal (7,500-
8,400 kJ) per day.
3. Goal: Client's goal calorie intake level is 1,800 calories/kcal (7,500 kJ) per day.
Based on client food diary, client's total energy estimated intake in 24 hours
averages approximately 2,600 calories/kcal (11,000 kJ) per day, 145% of
Initial encounter recommended level of 1,800 calories/ kcal (7,500 kJ) per day. Client's goal is 1,800
calories/kcal (7,500 kJ) per day. Will evaluate calorie intake at next encounter in
two weeks.
Significant progress toward meeting goal. Based on client's food diary, patient/client
Reassessment after consuming approximately 2,100 calories/kcal (9,000 kJ) per day, 117% of goal level
nutrition intervention of 1,800 calories/ kcal (7,500 kJ) per day. Will evaluate energy intake at next
encounter in two weeks.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Measuring resting metabolic rate (RMR)
in the healthy and non-critically ill guideline. https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5299&cat=5217.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 4, 2019.
3. Government of Canada. Dietary Reference Intakes. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-
canada/services/food-nutrition/healthy-eating/dietary-reference-intakes.html. Accessed February 4, 2019.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
5. Israel Dietary Reference Intakes.
https://www.health.gov.il/Subjects/FoodAndNutrition/Nutrition/Documents/70420914_2.pdf. Accessed
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-1-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:10 AM Energy Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-1-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Fluid Intake
FLUID INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total fluid estimated intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of fluid
from all sources
Fluid estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate
intake in one day of fluid from oral intake
Beverage with high intensity sweetener estimated oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—
defined as the approximate intake in one day of high intensity, nonnutritive and nutritive,
sweetened beverages that contain nutritive and nonnutritive sugar substitutes
100 percent fruit juice estimated oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the
approximate intake in one day of 100% fruit juice
Fluid estimated intake per kg in 24 hours (mL/kg/day)--defined as the approximate intake per kg of body
weight in one day of fluid from all sources
Fluid estimated intake from food in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
fluid from food intake
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-1 1/4
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Fluid Intake
Free water estimated intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of free water from all sources
Free water estimated intake from breastmilk in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate
intake in one day of free water derived from breastmilk
Free water estimated intake from infant formula in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the
approximate intake in one day of free water derived from infant formula
Free water estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the
approximate intake of free water per day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Free water estimated intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the
approximate intake of free water per day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Free water estimated intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the
approximate intake of free water per day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Total fluid measured intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
fluid from all sources
Fluid measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake in one day of fluid from oral intake
Water measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of water
Sugar sweetened beverage measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake in one day of sugar sweetened beverages
Beverage with high intensity sweetener measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as
the known quantity of intake in one day of high intensity sweetened beverages that contain
nutritive and nonnutritive sugar substitutes
100 percent fruit juice measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake in one day of 100% fruit juice
Liquid dairy product measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake in one day of dairy beverages
Caffeinated beverage measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake in one day of caffeinated beverages
Liquid meal replacement measured oral intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake in one day of a liquid that can replace a meal
Fluid measured intake from food in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of fluid from food intake
Fluid measured intake per kg in 24 hours (mL/kg/day)--defined as the known quantity of intake per kg of
body weight in one day of fluid from all sources
Free water measured intake in 24 hours—defined as the known quantity of intake from all sources
Free water measured intake from breastmilk in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake in one day of free water derived from breastmilk
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-1 2/4
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Fluid Intake
Free water measured intake from infant formula in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake in one day of free water derived from infant formula
Free water measured intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake of free water per day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Free water measured intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake of free water per day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Free water measured intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake of free water per day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Note: Alcohol intake is recorded on the Alcohol intake reference sheet. Total volumes of breastmilk and
infant formula can be found on the Breastmilk/Infant formula intake reference sheet. Total volume of
enteral nutrition can be found on the Enteral nutrition intake reference sheet. Total volume of parenteral
nutrition can be found on the Parenteral nutrition intake reference sheet. Biochemical measures of
hydration status can be found on the Electrolyte and Renal Profile and Urine Profile reference sheets
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food and fluid intake
records, 24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaire, intake and output data, observation, weight measurement
records
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based
nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate oral intake, food medication interaction, underweight, overweight/obesity, unintended
weight loss, unintended weight gain, disordered eating pattern, undesirable food choices, limited adherence to
nutrition related recommendations, inability to manage self care, swallowing difficulty, breastfeeding difficulty,
altered GI function
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Fluid estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (mL/day)
Criteria for Evaluation
Comparison to Reference Standard, Recommendation, or Goal:
1. Reference Standard: Reference intake standards
2. Recommendation: Client's fluid estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours is 1,000 mL (33 oz).
Recommendated intake is 2,600 mL per 24 hours.
3. Goal: Client currently drinks 1,000 mL (33 oz) of oral fluids per day and has a personal goal of
consuming 1,920 mL(64 oz) of fluid per day.
Based on client's food diary, Fluid estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours is
Initial nutrition assessment approximately 1,000 mL(33 oz). Goal is to consume approximately 1,920 mL (64
oz) of fluid per day. Will monitor fluid intake at next encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward goal fluid intake. Based on fluid intake records,
nutrition intervention patient/client increased consumption of fluids from 1,000 mL (33 oz) to 1,920 mL
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-1 3/4
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Fluid Intake
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Canadian Nutrient File. https://food-nutrition.canada.ca/cnf-fce/index-eng.jsp. Accessed February 22,
2019.
2. Government of Canada. Dietary Reference Intakes. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-
canada/services/food-nutrition/healthy-eating/dietary-reference-intakes.html. Accessed February 4, 2019.
3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
4. Israel Dietary Reference Intakes.
https://www.health.gov.il/Subjects/FoodAndNutrition/Nutrition/Documents/70420914_2.pdf. Accessed
February 20, 2019.
5. The National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New
Zealand. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/nutrient-reference-values-australia-and-new-zealand.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
6. New Zealand Food Composition Data. https://www.foodcomposition.co.nz/foodfiles/concise-tables/.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
7. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012: Integrating nutrition and physical
activity. 2012; https://www.norden.org/en/publication/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2012-0.
Accessed February 20, 2019.
8. US Department of Agriculture. Food and Nutrition Research Center. What’s in the Foods You Eat Search
Tool. https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-
center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/whats-in-the-foods-you-eat-emsearch-toolem. Accessed
February 4, 2019.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-1 4/4
12/15/21, 9:12 AM Food Intake
FOOD INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Amount of food
Estimated amount of food
Types of food
Fortified food intake (present/absent)—defined as oral intake of foods with extra nutrients added
(eg, calcium-fortified orange juice)
Enriched food intake (present/absent)—defined as oral intake of foods that contain the nutrients
that were added back after being lost during processing
Special dietary food intake (present/absent)—defined as oral intake of foods that have been
modified for a nutrition purpose, eg, lactose free, gluten free, sugar free, low fat, nut free
Medical food intake (present/absent)—defined as oral intake of foods for a special medical
purpose to manage a nutrition related disease
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:12 AM Food Intake
Meal/snack* pattern
Healthy eating index (HEI) 2015 score—defined as an assessment of how well reported food intake
aligns with the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Food variety (present/absent)—defined as consumption of a wide assortment of foods from different food groups
on a regular basis
Note: Liquid meal replacements/supplements are found on the Fluid Intake reference sheet.
* Snack is defined as food served between regular meals.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaire, menu analysis, dietary and physical activity assessment tool (eg,
MyPlate), diet quality index (eg, Healthy Eating Index) or other reference intake standard tool
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions:Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based
nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate oral intake, food medication interaction, underweight, overweight/obesity, disordered
eating pattern, unintended weight gain, unintended weight loss, undesirable food choices, limited adherence to
nutrition related recommendations, inability to manage self care, limited access to food, intake of unsafe food,
inadequate or excessive energy, macronutrient or micronutrient intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Vegetable servings estimated in 24 hours and Fruit servings estimated in 24 hours
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-2 2/3
12/15/21, 9:12 AM Food Intake
2. Recommendation: Client's intake reflects an average of 1 to 2 servings vegetable servings in 24 hours and
1 fruit servings estimated in 24 hours, which is below the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
(DASH) Eating Plan recommendation of 9 servings of fruits and vegetables per day.
3. Goal: Client’s goal is to increase fruit and vegetable intake to 5 servings per day.
Based on client’s recalls, client’s intake reflects an average of 1-2 vegetable servings estimated in
Initial
24 hours and 1 fruit serving estimated in 24 hours, which is below client goal of 5 servings of
encounter
fruits and vegetables per day. Will monitor fruit and vegetable intake at next encounter.
Reassessment
after nutrition Met goal of increasing fruit and vegetable intake to 5 servings per day.
intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Gestational Diabetes Evidence-Based
Nutrition Guideline. https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5288&cat=5537. Accessed February 4,
2019.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 4, 2019.
3. European Commission. Food for special medical purposes.
https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/special_groups_food/medical_en. Accessed February
4, 2019.
4. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. Food for special medical purposes.
http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/nutrition/foodspecial/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed February
4, 2019.
5. Government of Canada. Dietary Reference Intakes. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-
canada/services/food-nutrition/healthy-eating/dietary-reference-intakes.html. Accessed February 4, 2019.
6. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, et al. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad
Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1591-1602.
7. The National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New
Zealand. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/nutrient-reference-values-australia-and-new-zealand.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
8. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Dietary Guidelines Summary. 2013;
https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/content/The%20Guidelines/n55a_australian_dietary_gu
idelines_summary_131014_1.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2019.
9. Ogata BN, Hayes D. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition guidance for healthy
children ages 2 to 11 years. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(8):1257-1276.
10. US Food and Drug Administration. Medical Foods Guidance Documents & Regulatory Information.
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/MedicalFood
s/default.htm. Accessed February 4, 2019.
11. USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. MyPlate. https://www.choosemyplate.gov/. Accessed
February 4, 2019
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Breastmilk*/Infant Formula Intake
Breastmilk intake
Note: Breastfeeding ability and capacity can be found on the Breastfeeding Assessment reference
sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-3 1/3
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Breastmilk*/Infant Formula Intake
Weight change can be found on the Body Composition/Growth/Weight History reference sheet.
Number of wet diapers per day can be found on the Urine Profile reference sheet.
If provided via tube use the Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Intake reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Intake records, 24-
hour recalls, usual intake recalls, observation of feeding (bottle or breast), pre and post breastfeeding infant
weights.
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Underweight, overweight, unintended weight gain, unintended weight loss, growth rate less than
expected, limited adherence to nutrition-related recommendations, inadequate or excessive energy intake,
inadequate or excessive oral or fluid intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
*If a synonym for the term “breastmilk” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “human milk.”
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Infant formula intake volume estimated in 24 hours (mL/day)
1. Reference Standard:Client's infant formula volume estimated in 24 hours averages 410 mL (100 mL/kg
body). This is below the reference standard of 150 mL/kg/day to support adequate growth.
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal: Client currently consumes approximately 100 mL/kg/kg body weight infant formula per day.
Client's goal is to increase intake to 150 mL/kg per day.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-3 2/3
12/15/21, 9:13 AM Breastmilk*/Infant Formula Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-2-3 3/3
12/15/21, 9:16 AM Enteral Nutrition Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Note: Enteral nutrition tolerance can be found on the Physical Exam reference sheet and/or the pertinent
biochemical/sign or symptom reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report/recalls,
patient/client record, home evaluation, intake and output record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Inadequate or excessive intake of enteral nutrition, inadequate fluid intake, food medication interaction,
unintended weight loss or gain
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Enteral nutrition formula volume in 24 hours (mL/day)
2. Recommendation: Client’s enteral nutrition formula volume in 24 hours meets the nutrition prescription
of 80 mL/hour in 24 hours.
3. Goal: Not applicable
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2015.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
December 17, 2017.
3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National coverage determination (NCD) for enteral and
parenteral nutrition therapy. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewncd.asp?
ncd_id=180.2&ncd_version=1&basket=ncd%3A180%2E2%3A1%3AEnteral+and+Parenteral+Nutritiona
l+Therapy. Accessed May 3, 2018.
4. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L. Best practice methods to apply to measurement of
resting metabolic rate in adults: A systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:881-903.
5. Kovacevich DS, Frederick A, Kelly D, Nishikawa R, Young L. American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors, Standards for Specialized Nutrition Support Task Force. Standards
for specialized nutrition support: home care patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:579-590.
6. Steiger E, HPEN Working Group. Consensus statements regarding optimal management of home
parenteral nutrition (HPN) access. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(1 Suppl):S94-S95.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-3-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:17 AM Parenteral Nutrition Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Note: Parenteral nutrition tolerance can be accomplished with the Physical Exam Reference sheet and/or
the pertinent biochemical/sign or symptom reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report/recalls,
client record, home evaluation, intake and output record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Inadequate or excessive intake of parenteral nutrition, inadequate fluid intake, food–medication interaction,
unintended weight loss or gain
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and reference
standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement techniques,
and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use in client
records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-3-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:17 AM Parenteral Nutrition Intake
Indicator(s) Selected
Rate/schedule (mL/hour × number of hours)
1. Goal: Patient/client’s parenteral nutrition formula is at a rate of 50 mL per hour × 24 hours of standard
solution compared to the nutrition prescription of 80 mL/hour × 24 hours to meet estimated nutrition
requirements.
OR
2. Reference Standard: There is no reference standard for this outcome as the provision of EN/PN is
individualized.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 17, 2015.
3. Cavicchi M, Philippe Beau P, Crenn P, Degott C, Messing B. Prevalence of liver disease and contributing
factors in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition for permanent intestinal failure. Intern Med.
2000;132:525-532.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National coverage determination (NCD) for enteral and
parenteral nutrition therapy. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewncd.asp?
ncd_id=180.2&ncd_version=1&basket=ncd%3A180%2E2%3A1%3AEnteral+and+Parenteral+Nutritiona
l+Therapy. Accessed June 17, 2015.
5. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L. Best practice methods to apply to measurement of
resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:881-903.
6. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients:
administration of specialized nutrition support—issues unique to pediatrics. J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2002;26(Suppl):S97-S110.
7. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients:
specific guidelines for disease—adults. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S61-S96.
8. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients:
specific guidelines for disease—pediatrics. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S111-S138.
9. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients: Life
cycle and metabolic conditions. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S45-S60.
10. Kovacevich DS, Frederick A, Kelly D, Nishikawa R, Young L. American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors, Standards for Specialized Nutrition Support Task Force. Standards
for specialized nutrition support: home care patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:579-590.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-3-2 2/3
12/15/21, 9:17 AM Parenteral Nutrition Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-3-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Alcohol Intake
ALCOHOL INTAKE
Alcohol intake in one week (g/week)—defined as the approximate intake over seven days of all sources
of alcohol
Alcohol intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of all sources of
alcohol
Beer intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of beer
Distilled alcohol intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
distilled alcohol
Wine intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of wine
Hard cider intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of cider
that contains alcohol
Days per week alcoholic drinks consumed (number)—defined as usual or average number of days per
week when alcohol containing drinks are consumed
Alcohol intake pattern on drinking days (number)—defined as the typical number of standard alcohol
containing drinks on a drinking day
Note: One alcohol containing drink is defined differently in countries around the world, with countries
using grams, ounces, milliliters, and units. Where applicable in this reference sheet, one standard alcohol
containing drink equals 10 g of pure alcohol (ethanol). Professionals need to refer to guidelines in their
respective countries to determine the alcohol content of one standard alcohol containing drink.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report/recalls,
self-monitoring log
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling, coordination of nutrition care by a nutrition professional, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive intake of alcohol, excessive or inadequate intake of energy, altered nutrition-related
laboratory values, impaired nutrient utilization, overweight/obesity
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Alcohol Intake
Indicator(s) Selected
Alcohol intake pattern on drinking days (number)
1. Reference Standard: Refer to country standards, if present, for alcohol reference standards.
2. Recommendation: Client’s intake of three to four standard alcohol drinks on drinking days is significantly
above the recommendation of one standard alcohol drink per day for adult females.
3. Goal: Client established a goal to reduce standard alcohol drink intake to one standard alcohol drink per
day.
Based on recalls, client’s Alcohol intake pattern on drinking days is three to four standard alcohol
Initial drinks, which is above the recommended amount for adult females. Client established goal to
encounter reduce intake to one standard alcohol drink on drinking days. Will monitor change in alcohol intake
at next encounter
Reassessme
nt after Progress toward goal. Alcohol intake pattern on drinking days, based on multiple 7-day records, is
nutrition approximately two standard alcohol drinks on drinking days.
intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse. National Council on
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Recommended Sets of Alcohol Consumption Questions.
https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions. Accessed
February 26, 2019.
2. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse. What is a standard
drink? https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/what-standard-drink.
Accessed February 27, 2019.
3. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Alcohol consumption measures.
https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/AssessingAlcohol/sobell.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 4, 2019.
5. World Health Organization. Management of substance abuse.
https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/alcohol/en/. Accessed February 27, 2019.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.21 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Bioactive Substance Intake
Note: Bioactive substances are not part of the Dietary Reference Intakes, and therefore there are no
established minimum requirements or Tolerable Upper Intake Levels. However, RDNs can assess whether
estimated intakes are adequate or excessive using the client goal or nutrition prescription for
comparison.
Working definition of bioactive substances—physiologically active components of foods that may have an
effect on health. There is no scientific consensus about a definition for bioactive substances/components.
Plant stanol ester estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
plant stanol esters
Plant sterol ester estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
plant sterol esters
Soy protein estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of soy
protein
Psyllium estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of psyllium
Beta glucan estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of beta
glucan
Plant stanol ester measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of plant stanol esters
Plant sterol ester measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of plant sterol esters
Soy protein measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
soy
protein
Psyllium measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
psyllium
Beta glucan measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
beta glucan
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Bioactive Substance Intake
Food additives intake (those thought to have an effect on a client’s health); specify
Excessive high intensity sweetener additive intake (present/absent)—defined as intake above the
recommended acceptable daily intake (ADI) of high intensity sweeteners the contain nutritive and
nonnutritive sugar substitutes
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report/recalls,
self monitoring log
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate or excessive intake of bioactive substances, food medication interaction
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Plant sterol ester estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)
Based on recalls, client consuming 0 gramsof plant sterol ester per day. Goal intake
Initial assessment of 2 g per day 5 out of 7 days per week established. Will monitor change in plant
sterol ester intake at next encounter.
Good progress toward the goal of 2 g per day 5 out of 7 days per week of plant
Reassessment after
sterol ester. Based on diet records, plant sterol ester estimated intake in 24 hours is
nutrition intervention
approximately 2 g per day 2 to 3 days per week.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Disorders of Lipid Metabolism.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5300. Accessed February 4, 2019.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library-GDM: Non-nutritive sweeteners. 2008;
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=3037&highlight=nonnutritive%20sweetener&evidence_summary_id=250587&home=1%2E.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Conclusion Statements: Carbohydrate (2001). https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-2 2/3
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Bioactive Substance Intake
highlight=nonnutritive%20sweetener&home=1&evidence_summary_id=250309&cat=3820. Accessed
February 27, 2019.
4. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library-Nutritive and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners.
2010-2011; https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5307. Accessed February 4, 2019.
5. Briggs Early K, Stanley K. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The Role of Medical
Nutrition Therapy and Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in the Prevention and Treatment of Prediabetes
and Type 2 Diabetes. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(2):343-353.
6. Crowe KM, Francis C. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Functional foods. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113(8):1096-1103.
7. European Commission. Food improvement agents: Additives.
https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_improvement_agents/additives_en. Accessed February 4, 2019.
8. US Food and Drug Administration. Overview of Food Ingredients, Additives and Colors.
https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm094211.htm.
Accessed February 4, 2019.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Caffeine Intake
CAFFEINE INTAKE
Total caffeine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
caffeine
Total caffeine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of caffeine
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report/recalls,
self monitoring log
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Food
and nutrition-related knowledge deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Total caffeine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)
1. Reference Standard:Client’s intake is approximately 600 mg of caffeine per day, which is above the
reference standard of 400 mg caffeine/day.
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal: Client’s total caffeine estimated intake in 24 hours is above the goal the client established of less
than 400 mg caffeine/day.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-3 1/2
12/15/21, 9:21 AM Caffeine Intake
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. McCusker RR, Goldberger BA, Cone EJ. Caffeine content of specialty coffees. J Anal Toxicol.
2003;27(7):520-522.
2. McCusker RR, Goldberger BA, Cone EJ. Caffeine content of energy drinks, carbonated sodas, and other
beverages. J Anal Toxicol. 2006;30(2):112-114.
3. Institute of Medicine. Caffeine in food and dietary supplements: Examining safety: Workshop summary.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2014.
4. Nawrot P, Jordan S, Eastwood J, Rotstein J, Hugenholtz A, Feeley M. Effects of caffeine on human
health. Food Addit Contam. 2003;20(1): 1-30.
5. Winkelmayer WC, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Curhan, GC. Habitual caffeine intake and the risk of
hypertension in women. JAMA.2005;294(18):2330-2335.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-4-3 2/2
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Fat Intake
FAT INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total fat estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of all types
of fat
Saturated fat estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a fat
that has no double bonds between carbon molecules
Trans fatty acid estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of an
unsaturated fatty acid that is hydrogenated with the trans arrangement of the hydrogen atoms adjacent to
its double bonds
Polyunsaturated fat estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
a fatty acid that contains more than one double bond
Linoleic acid (LA) estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one
day of a polyunsaturated, omega 6 and essential fatty acid with an 18 carbon chain length and two
cis double bonds (18:2)
Monounsaturated fat estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a fatty acid with one unsaturated (double) carbon bond
Omega 3 fatty acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a polyunsaturated fatty acid with a double bond at the third carbon atom from the methyl end of the
carbon chain
Alpha linolenic acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)--defined as the approximate intake in
one day of a polyunsaturated and essential omega 3 fatty acid with an 18-carbon chain and three
cis double bonds (18:3)
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate
intake in one day of a polyunsaturated, omega 3 fatty acid with a 20-carbon chain and five cis
double bonds
Docosahexaenoic acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake
in one day of a polyunsaturated, omega 3 fatty acid with a 22-carbon chain and six cis double
bonds
Essential fatty acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a fatty acid (Linoleic acid [18:2] and Alphalinolenic acid [18:3]) that must be provided in the diet or
enteral or parenteral nutrition because the human body cannot synthesize it
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-1 1/4
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Fat Intake
Medium chain triglyceride estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day—defined as the approximate intake in one
day of a triglyceride molecule with fatty acids having a carbon chain length of 6-12
Fat estimated intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the approximate intake in one meal of all types of
fat
Percent saturated fat estimated intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the approximate energy
intake in one day from fat that has no double bonds between carbon molecules as a portion of total energy
intake
Fat estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of fat in
grams in one day derived from oral intake
Fat estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of fat in
grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Fat estimated intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of fat
in grams in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Fat estimated intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of fat in
grams in one day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Fat additive estimated intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of fat
additive
Percent fat estimated intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the approximate energy intake in one
day from fat intake
Total fat measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of all
types of fat
Saturated fat measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
a fat that has no double bonds between carbon molecules
Trans fatty acid measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of an unsaturated fatty acid that is hydrogenated with the trans arrangement of the hydrogen atoms
adjacent to its double bonds
Polyunsaturated fat measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of a fatty acid that contains more than one double bond
Linoleic acid (LA) measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
in one day of a polyunsaturated, omega 6 and essential fatty acid with an 18 carbon chain length
and two cis double bonds (18:2)
Monounsaturated fat measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of a fatty acid with one unsaturated (double) carbon bond
Omega 3 fatty acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of a polyunsaturated fatty acid with a double bond at the third carbon atom from the methyl end
of the carbon chain
Alpha linolenic acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)--defined as the known quantity of
intake in one day of a polyunsaturated and essential omega 3 fatty acid with an 18-carbon chain
and three cis double bonds (18:3)
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake in one day of a polyunsaturated, omega 3 fatty acid with a 20-carbon chain and
five cis double bonds
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake in one day of a polyunsaturated, omega 3 fatty acid with a 22-carbon chain and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-1 2/4
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Fat Intake
Essential fatty acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of a fatty acid (Linoleic acid [18:2] and Alphalinolenic acid [18:3]) that must be provided in the
diet or enteral or parenteral nutrition because the human body cannot synthesize it
Medium chain triglyceride measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
in one day of a triglyceride molecule with fatty acids having a carbon chain length of 6-12
Fat measured intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one meal of all
types of fat
Percent saturated fat measured intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
in one day of fat that has no double bonds between carbon molecules as a portion of total energy intake
Fat measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake of
fat in grams in one day derived from oral intake
Fat measured intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
of fat in grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Fat measured intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake of fat in grams in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Fat measured intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
of fat in grams in one day derived from intravenous fluid (IV) infusion
Fat additive measured intake in 24 hours (mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of fat additive
Percent fat measured intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the known quantity of energy intake in
one day from fat intake
Note: Plant sterol and stanol esters can be found on the Bioactive Substance Intake Reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative intake assessment, menu analysis, fat and cholesterol
targeted questionnaires and monitoring devices
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Inadequate
and excessive fat intake, intake of types of fats inconsistent with needs, overweight/obesity, altered nutrition-
related lab values, altered food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Total fat estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-1 3/4
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Fat Intake
Based on food diary, client’s total fat estimated intake in 24 hours is 120 g. Client’s
Initial encounter goal is to decrease total fat estimated intake in 24 hours to less than 80 g. Will
monitor fat intake at next appointment.
Significant progress toward the goal intake of less than 80 g of total fat estimated
Reassessment after intake in 24 hours. Based on food diary client’s total fat estimated intake in 24 hours
nutrition intervention decreased from 120g to 85 g of fat in one day. Will continue to monitor progress at
next encounter in 6 weeks.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-1 4/4
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Cholesterol Intake
CHOLESTEROL INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference
Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.)
Cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
cholesterol
Cholesterol measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
cholesterol
Note: Plant sterol and stanol esters can be found on the Bioactive Substance Intake Reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative intake assessment, menu analysis, fat and cholesterol
targeted questionnaires and monitoring devices
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive fat intake, excessive cholesterol intake, overweight/obesity, altered nutrition related lab
values, altered food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:23 AM Cholesterol Intake
Based on food diary, client’s cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours is 350 mg/day.
Initial nutrition assessment Client’s goal is to reduce cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours to 100-300
mg/day. Will monitor cholesterol intake at next appointment.
Progress toward the goal of 100-300 mg/day of cholesterol. Based on food diary,
Reassessment after
client’s cholesterol estimated intake in 24 hours decreased from 350 mg/day to 250
nutrition intervention
mg/day. Will continue to monitor progress at next encounter in 6 weeks.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate,
Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2002.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 12, 2018.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
February 9, 2018.
4. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Disorders of Lipid Metabolism.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5300. Accessed February 9, 2018.
5. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood
cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: A report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889-2934.
6. Van Horn L, McCoin M, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. The evidence for dietary prevention and treatment of
cardiovascular disease. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(2):287-331.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Protein Intake
PROTEIN INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total protein estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of all
protein
High biological value protein estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in
one day from proteins which contain a ratio of essential amino acids that are needed for humans
Casein estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day from the
phosphoprotein component in milk and milk products that can also be an ingredient in food
Whey estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of the complete
protein component in milk and milk products that can also be an ingredient in food
Gluten estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of the protein
found primarily in cereal grains and contains gliadin and a glutenin
Protein estimated intake per kg in 24 hours (g/kg/day)—defined as the approximate intake per kg of body
weight in one day of all protein
Natural protein estimated intake in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the approximate intake of the
portion of total protein that comes from food sources
Protein estimated intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the approximate intake in one meal of all types
of protein
Percent protein estimated intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
from protein intake
Protein estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the approximate
intake of protein in grams per day derived from oral intake
Protein estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the approximate
intake of protein in grams per day derived from intact or semi-elemental protein enteral nutrition infusion
Protein additive estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day and mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in
one day of protein additive
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-3 1/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Protein Intake
Total protein measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
all protein
High biological value protein measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake in one day from proteins which contain a ratio of essential amino acids that are needed for humans
Casein measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day from the
phosphoprotein component in milk and milk products that can also be an ingredient in food
Whey measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of the
complete protein component in milk and milk products that can also be an ingredient in food
Gluten measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of the
protein found primarily in cereal grains and contains gliadin and a glutenin
Protein measured intake in 24 hours (g/kg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake per kg of body
weight in one day of all protein
Natural protein measured intake in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake of
the portion of total protein that comes from food sources
Protein measured intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one meal of all
types of protein
Percent protein measured intake in 24 hours (percent/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day from protein intake
Protein measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the known quantity
of intake of protein in grams per day derived from oral intake
Protein measured intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (specify, g/day)—defined as the known
quantity of intake of protein in grams per day derived from intact or semi-elemental protein enteral
nutrition infusion
Protein additive measured intake in 24 hours (g/day and mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake in one day of protein additive
Note: Soy protein can be found on the Bioactive Substance Intake reference sheet. Amino acid intake from
elemental enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or intravenous (IV) fluids can be documented using
terms on the Amino Acid Intake (FH-1.5.4) reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative protein intake collection tools, nutrition fact labels,
other product information, nutrient composition tables
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate and excessive protein intake, intake of types of proteins or amino acids inconsistent with
needs, malnutrition, inadequate protein-energy intake, altered GI function, limited adherence to nutrition-related
recommendations
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and reference
standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement techniques,
and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use in client
records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-3 2/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Protein Intake
Indicator Selected
Total protein estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)
1. Reference Standard: Client’s total protein estimated intake in 24 hours of 25 g/ day is less than the
Dietary Reference Intake of 53 g/day (0.8 g/kg body weight).
2. Recommendation: 55-65 g/day (1 to 1.2 g/kg body weight).
3. Goal: Client’s goal is to increase enteral nutrition feeding to provide at least 45 g/day protein.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-3 3/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Protein Intake
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-3 4/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Amino Acid Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total amino acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
total amino acids
Essential amino acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one
day of amino acids that cannot be synthesized by humans and must be provided by the diet or by enteral
or parenteral nutrition
Histidine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
an essential amino acid with the formula C6H9N3O2
Methionine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of an essential amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2S
Isoleucine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
an essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C6H13NO2
Leucine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
an essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C6H13NO2
Lysine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of an
essential amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2
Threonine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
an essential amino acid with the formula C4H9NO3
Tryptophan estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of an essential amino acid with the formula C11H12N2O2
Valine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of an
essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2
Nonessential amino acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one
day of amino acids that can be synthesized by humans
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-4 1/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Amino Acid Intake
Arginine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
a nonessential amino acid with the formula C6H14N4O2
Glutamine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a nonessential amino acid with the formula C5H10N2O3
Tyramine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
a nonessential amino acid with the formula C8H11NO
Total amino acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of total amino acids
Essential amino acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of amino acids that cannot be synthesized by humans and must be provided by the diet or by
enteral or parenteral nutrition
Histidine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid with the formula C6H9N3O2
Methionine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2S
Isoleucine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C6H13NO2
Leucine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C6H13NO2
Lysine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of an essential amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2
Threonine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid with the formula C4H9NO3
Tryptophan measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of an essential amino acid with the formula C11H12N2O2
Valine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of an
essential amino acid and branched-chain amino acid with the formula C5H11NO2
Nonessential amino acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
in one day of amino acids that can be synthesized by humans
Arginine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of a nonessential amino acid with the formula C6H14N4O2
Glutamine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of a nonessential amino acid with the formula C5H10N2O3
Tyramine measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of a nonessential amino acid with the formula C8H11NO
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-4 2/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Amino Acid Intake
Amino acids from enteral nutrition (specify g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of amino acids in grams in
one day derived from elemental enteral nutrition infusion
Amino acids from parenteral nutrition (specify g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of amino acids in grams
in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Amino acids from intravenous fluids (specify g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of amino acids in grams in
one day derived from intravenous (IV) infusion
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative amino acid intake collection tools, nutrition fact
labels, other product information, nutrient composition tables
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Intake
of types of amino acids inconsistent with needs, malnutrition, inadequate protein-energy intake, altered GI
function, limited adherence to nutrition-related recommendations
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Histidine estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/kg/day)
1. Reference Standard:Client’s current intake of histidine per day is 520 mg/day (8 mg/kg/day) below the
EAR level of 11 mg/kg/day of histidine.
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal:Client established a goal of histidine estimated intake in 24 hours of at least 715 mg/day (11
mg/kg/day).
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate,
Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2002.
2. Young VR, Borgouha S. Adult human amino acid requirements. Curr Opin Clin Metab Care. 1999;2:39-
45.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-4 3/4
12/15/21, 9:25 AM Amino Acid Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-4 4/4
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Carbohydrate Intake
CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
total carbohydrate
Complex carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)– defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a polysaccharide that is comprised of three or more sugars; also called starch
Simple carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of mono- and disaccharides
Galactose estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a
monosaccharide which is a common component of lactose
Lactose estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a
disaccharide sugar of galactose and glucose; present in milk
Fructose estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a
monosaccharide sugar found in fruit and honey
Carbohydrate estimated intake per kg in 24 hours (g/kg/day)—defined as the approximate intake per kg
of body weight in one day of all carbohydrate
Carbohydrate estimated intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the approximate intake in one meal of
all types of carbohydrate
Carbohydrate estimated intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake of
carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from oral intake
Carbohydrate estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated intake
of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Carbohydrate estimated intake from parenteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated
intake of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-5 1/4
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Carbohydrate Intake
Carbohydrate estimated intake from intravenous fluids in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the estimated
intake of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from intravenous (IV) infusion
Carbohydrate additive estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of carbohydrate additive
Estimated daily glycemic index value (number)—defined as the estimated measure in one day reflecting
the consumption of all carbohydrate
Estimated daily glycemic load (number)—defined as the estimated measure in one day reflecting the
quantity and type of all carbohydrate consumed
Insulin to carbohydrate ratio (ratio)—defined as the estimated number of grams of carbohydrate covered
by one unit of rapid-acting (or short-acting) insulin
Total carbohydrate measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of total carbohydrate
Complex carbohydrate measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)– defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of a polysaccharide that is comprised of three or more sugars; also called starch
Simple carbohydrate measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of mono- and disaccharides
Galactose measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of a
monosaccharide which is a common component of lactose
Lactose measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of a
disaccharide sugar of galactose and glucose; present in milk
Fructose measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of a
monosaccharide sugar found in fruit and honey
Carbohydrate measured intake per kg in 24 hours (g/kg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
per kg of body weight in one day of all carbohydrate
Carbohydrate measured intake in one meal (g/meal)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
meal of all types of carbohydrate
Carbohydrate measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of
intake of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from oral intake
Carbohydrate measured intake from enteral nutrition (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake of
carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Carbohydrate measured intake from parenteral nutrition (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from parenteral nutrition infusion
Carbohydrate measured intake from intravenous fluids (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake
of carbohydrate in grams in one day derived from intravenous (IV) infusion
Carbohydrate additive measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of carbohydrate additive
Note: Fiber intake can be found on the Fiber Intake reference sheet.
Psyllium and beta glucan can be found on the Bioactive Substance Intake reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour or typical day’s recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative intake assessment, menu analysis,
carbohydrate counting tools, intake/output sheets (for tube feeding or parenteral nutrition)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-5 2/4
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Carbohydrate Intake
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Inadequate and excessive carbohydrate intake, intake of types of carbohydrate inconsistent with needs,
inconsistent carbohydrate intake, altered nutrition related laboratory values, food medication interaction
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Total carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)
Based on 3-day diet records, client’s total carbohydrate estimated intake in 24 hours
Initial encounter
averages 295 g/day, above the client’s goal of 225 g/day.
Reassessment after Good progress made toward goal. Client’s total carbohydrate estimated intake in 24
nutrition intervention hours averages 245 g/day. Will monitor carbohydrate intake at next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Diabetes type 1 and 2.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5305. Accessed February 21, 2019.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Diabetes prevention.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5344. Accessed February 4, 2019.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 4, 2019.
4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/42/Supplement_1. Accessed February 4, 2019.
5. Flood A, Subar AF, Hull SG, Zimmerman TP, Jenkins DJ, Schatzkin A. Methodology for adding
glycemic load values to the National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire database. J Am Diet
Assoc. 2006;106(3):393-402.
6. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
7. Lin CS, Kimokoti RW, Brown LS, Kaye EA, Nunn ME, Millen BE. Methodology for adding glycemic
index to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey nutrient database. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2012;112(11):1843-1851.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 4, 2019.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-5 3/4
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Carbohydrate Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-5 4/4
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Fiber Intake
FIBER INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of total
fiber
Soluble fiber estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
soluble fiber
Insoluble fiber estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
insoluble fiber
Fiber estimated intake from oral intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake of fiber in
grams in one day derived from oral intake
Fiber estimated intake from enteral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake of
fiber in grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
Fiber additive estimated intake in 24 hours (g or mL/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of fiber additive
Total fiber measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
total fiber
Soluble fiber measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
soluble fiber
Insoluble fiber measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of insoluble fiber
Fiber measured intake from oral nutrition in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake of
fiber in grams in one day derived from oral intake
Fiber measured intake from enteral nutrition (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake of fiber in
grams in one day derived from enteral nutrition infusion
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-6 1/3
12/15/21, 9:26 AM Fiber Intake
Fiber additive measured intake in 24 hours (g or mL/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in
one day of fiber additive
Note: Psyllium and beta glucan can be found on the Bioactive Substance Intake reference sheet
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires, qualitative intake assessment, menu analysis, fiber counting
tools, nutrition fact labels, other product information, nutrient composition tables
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Inadequate and excessive fiber intake, altered GI function, disordered eating pattern, inadequate bioactive
substance intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)
1. Reference Standard: Client’s total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours averages15 g/day, which is below the
Dietary Reference Intake of 25 g/day for a 40-year-old woman.
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal: Client’s goal is to increase fiber intake to approximately 25 g/day.
Based on food diary, client’s total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours averages 15
Initial encounter
g/day. Will monitor fiber intake at next encounter in three weeks.
Goal achieved. Client’s total fiber estimated intake in 24 hours averages 27 g/day,
Reassessment after
which meets the goal intake of 25 g/day. Will continue to monitor to ensure that
nutrition intervention
success is sustained.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-5-6 3/3
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Vitamin Intake
VITAMIN INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Vitamin A estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin A
Vitamin C estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin C
Vitamin D estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin D;
Vitamin E estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin E;
Vitamin K estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin K;
Thiamin estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of thiamin
Riboflavin estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
riboflavin
Niacin estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of niacin
Folate estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of folate
Vitamin B6 estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin B6
Vitamin B12 estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
vitamin B12
Pantothenic acid estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
pantothenic acid
Biotin estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of biotin
Multivitamin estimated intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a
multivitamin
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-1 1/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Vitamin Intake
Vitamin A measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin A
Vitamin C measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin C
Vitamin D measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin D;
Vitamin E measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin E;
Vitamin K measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin K;
Thiamin measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
thiamin
Riboflavin measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
riboflavin
Niacin measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
niacin
Folate measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
folate
Vitamin B6 measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
vitamin B6
Vitamin B12 measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of vitamin B12
Pantothenic acid measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of pantothenic acid
Biotin measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
biotin
Multivitamin measured intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of a multivitamin
Note: Laboratory measures associated with body vitamin status can be found on the Vitamin Profile
reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report or
recalls, food frequency, qualitative intake assessment, home evaluation, supplement use questionnaire
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of vitamins, parenteral, or enteral nutrition
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-1 2/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Vitamin Intake
Client Example
Example of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation
for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Vitamin D estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)
1. Reference Standard: Client’s Vitamin D estimated intake in 24 hours is 4 µg/day (160 IU), which is
below the estimated average requirement (EAR) of 10 µg (400 IU) and the RDA of 15 µg (600 IU) for a
15-year-old male.
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal: Client established a goal to resume vitamin D supplement 4 out of 7 days per week.
Based on recalls, client with cystic fibrosis has Vitamin D estimated intake in 24
hours of 4 µg/day, which is below the Estimated Average Requirement of 10 µg
(400 IU) and the RDA of 15 ug (600 IU) per day for Vitamin D for a 15-year old
Initial nutrition assessment male. Client has also discontinued fat-soluble vitamin supplement, but has
established a goal to take supplement 4 out of 7 days per week. Will monitor
Vitamin D intake at next encounter and intake of fat-soluble vitamin supplement
and request 25 Hydroxy, vitamin D level (Vitamin Profile reference sheet).
25 Hydroxy, vitamin D level below expected range (from Vitamin Profile). Progress
toward the EAR of 10 µg (400 IU) and RDA of 15 ug (600 IU). Based on diet
record, client’s Vitamin D estimated intake in 24 hours from food sources is 5-7
Reassessment after
µg/day (200-280 IU), and client is taking fat-soluble vitamin supplement 5 days per
nutrition intervention
week on average. Despite progress, because client has cystic fibrosis, client will
need to continue fat-soluble vitamin supplementation in addition to food sources.
Repeat lab in 3 months.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-1 3/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Vitamin Intake
8. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate,
Vitamin B12, Pantothenic acid, Biotin,and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1998.
9. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2001.
10. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
11. Marra MV, Boyer AP. Position of the American Dietetic Association; Nutrient supplementation. J Am
Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(12):2073-2085.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-1 4/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Mineral/Element Intake
MINERAL/ELEMENT INTAKE
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Calcium estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of calcium
Chloride estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of calcium
Iron estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of iron
Magnesium estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
magnesium
Potassium estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
potassium
Phosphorus estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
phosphorus
Sodium estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of sodium
Zinc estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of zinc
Sulfate estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of sulfate
Fluoride estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of fluoride
Copper estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of copper
Iodine estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of iodine
Selenium estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
selenium
Manganese estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
manganese
Chromium estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
chromium
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-2 1/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Mineral/Element Intake
Molybdenum estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of
molybdenum
Boron estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of boron
Cobalt estimated intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of cobalt
Multimineral estimated intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the approximate intake in one day of a
multimineral
Multitrace element estimated intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the approximate intake in one day
of a multitrace element
Calcium measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
calcium
Chloride measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
calcium
Iron measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of iron
Magnesium measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
magnesium
Potassium measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
potassium
Phosphorus measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
phosphorus
Sodium measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
sodium
Zinc measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of zinc
Sulfate measured intake in 24 hours (g/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
sulfate
Fluoride measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
fluoride
Copper measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
copper
Iodine measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
iodine
Selenium measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
selenium
Manganese measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
manganese
Chromium measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
chromium
Molybdenum measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of molybdenum
Boron measured intake in 24 hours (mg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
boron
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-2 2/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Mineral/Element Intake
Cobalt measured intake in 24 hours (µg/day)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day of
cobalt
Multimineral measured intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one day
of a multimineral
Multitrace element measured intake in 24 hours (yes/no)—defined as the known quantity of intake in one
day of a multitrace element
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report or
recalls, food frequency, qualitative intake assessment, home evaluation, home care or pharmacy report,
supplement use questionnaire
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of minerals, food medication interaction, altered nutrition related
laboratory values, impaired nutrient utilization, undesirable food choices, limited adherence to nutrition related
recommendations
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator Selected
Calcium estimated intake in 24 hours (mg/day)
1. Reference Standard: The client’s calcium estimated intake in 24 hours averages 500 mg/day, which is
50% of the recommended dietary allowance for women 31 to 50 years of age.
2. Recommendation:Not applicable
3. Goal: Client’s goal is to increase calcium intake via food to 1,000 mg/day.
Based on recalls, client’s calcium estimated intake in 24 hours is 500 mg/day, which
Initial nutrition assessment is below the RDA for women 31 to 50 years of age. Client’s goal is to increase
with client intake of calcium to 1,000 mg/day via calcium-rich foods. Will monitor calcium
intake at next encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward RDA. Based on diet record, client’s calcium estimated
nutrition intervention intake in 24 hours is 750 mg/day, 75% of the RDA.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-2 3/4
12/15/21, 9:27 AM Mineral/Element Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-6-2 4/4
12/15/21, 9:28 AM Consistency Modifier Intake
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Food intake records,
24-hour recalls, intake records, qualitative intake assessment
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition
care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Swallowing difficulty; inadequate oral intake; inadequate energy, macronutrient or micronutrient intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Thickener additive estimated intake in 24 hours (g/day and mL/day)
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-1-7-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:03 AM Diet Order
DIET ORDER
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Modified diet order (eg, type, amount of energy and/or nutrients/day, distribution, texture)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Medical record,
referring health care provider or agency, client history
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate or excessive energy, macronutrient or micronutrient intake, inadequate or excessive oral
intake, swallowing difficulty
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Modified diet order
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:03 AM Diet Order
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.19 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Diet Experience
DIET EXPERIENCE
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Previous modified diet (specify, e.g., type, amount of energy and/or nutrients/day, distribution,
texture)
Enteral nutrition order (specify)
Parenteral nutrition order (specify)
Self-selected diets followed (specify, e.g., commercial diets, diet books, culturally directed)
Dieting attempts
Food allergies
Previous modified diet (specify, e.g., type and/or foods/food group) followed as a result of
diagnosed or reported food allergy
Food intolerance
Previous modified diet (specify, e.g., type and/or foods/food group) followed as a result of
diagnosed or reported food intolerance
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client report,
medical record, patient/client history, food and nutrition delivery coordination of care
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Disordered eating pattern, not ready for diet/lifestyle change, excessive oral intake, food- and nutrition-related
knowledge deficit, unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food- or nutrition-related topics, undesirable food choices,
swallowing difficulty, intake of unsafe food
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-2 1/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Diet Experience
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Previous diet/nutrition education/counseling
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Hager M. Hospital therapeutic diet orders and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: steering
through regulations to provide quality nutrition care and avoid survey citations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;
106 (2):198-204.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 17, 2015.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Pediatric Nutrition Care Manual.
http://peds.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed June 17, 2015.
4. Hager M. Therapeutic diet order writing: current issues and considerations. Topic Clin Nutr. 2007;22:28-
36.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-2 2/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Eating Environment
EATING ENVIRONMENT
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Location (specify, e.g., home, school, day care, restaurant, nursing home, senior center)
Atmosphere
Caregiver/companion
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client report,
medical record, referring health care provider or agency, observation
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate oral intake, self-feeding difficulty, poor nutrition quality of life, limited access to food
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-3 1/3
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Eating Environment
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Eats at designated eating location
1. Goal: Two-year-old child with inadequate intake of calories/kcal/kJ and/or nutrients. Goal is to improve
intake through modifications in feeding environment and meal pattern.
OR
2. Reference Standard: No validated standard exists
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Spruijt-Metz D, Lindquist CH, Birch LL, Fisher JO, Goran MI. Relation between mothers’ child-feeding
practices and children’s adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:581-586.
2. Boutelle KN, Birnbaum AS, Lytle LA, Murray DM, Story M. Associations between perceived family meal
environment and parent intake of fruit, vegetables and fat. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003;35:24-29.
3. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics.
1998;101:539-549.
4. O’Dea JA. Why do kids eat healthful food? Perceived benefits of and barriers to healthful eating and
physical activity among children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(4):497-501.
5. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Mothers’ child-feeding practices influence daughters’ eating and weight. Am J Clin
Nutr. 2000; 71:1054-1061.
6. Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:41-62.
7. Campbell K, Crawford, D. Family food environments as determinants of preschool-aged children’s eating
behaviours: implications for obesity prevention policy. Aust J Nutr Diet. 2005;58:19-25.
8. Hurtsi UK. Factors influencing children’s food choice. Ann Med. 1999;31(Suppl 1):26-32.
9. Birch LL, Fisher JO, Davison KK. Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices
promotes girls’ eating in the absence of hunger. 2003. Am J Clin Nutr. 78:215-220.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-3 2/3
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Eating Environment
10. Wansink B, Cheney MM. Super bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption. JAMA. 2005;293:1727-
1728.
11. Wansink B. Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing
consumers. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:455-479.
12. Rozin P, Kabnick K, Pete E, Fischler C, Shields C. The ecology of eating: smaller portion sizes in France
than in the United States help explain the French paradox. Psychol Sci. 2003;14:450-454.
13. Rozin P. The meaning of food in our lives: a cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being. J Nutr
Educ Behav. 2005;37(suppl): 107-112.
14. Birch LL, Davison KK. Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of
food intake and childhood over weight. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(4):893-907.
15. Hetherington MM. Cues to overeat: psychological factors influencing overconsumption. Proc Nutr Soc.
2007;66(1):113-23.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-3 3/3
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Administration
Enteral access, specify, e.g., nasoentric, oroenteric, percutaneous, or surgical access with gastric,
duodenal or jejunal placement
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client
report/recalls, patient/client record, patient/client nutrition-focused physical exam, provider referral
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate or excessive enteral or parenteral nutrition infusion, inadequate fluid intake, predicted
food–medication interaction
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Enteral access (nasocentric)
1. Goal: Patient/client’s enteral nutrition is delivered via nasoenteric feeding tube which will remain patent
so patient/client can receive feeding to meet estimated nutrition requirements.
OR
2. Reference Standard: There is no reference standard for this outcome.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-4 1/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Administration
Patient/client’s enteral nutrition is delivered via nasoenteric feeding tube which will
Initial nutrition assessment
remain patent so patient/client can receive feeding to meet estimated nutrition
with client
requirements. Monitor enteral nutrition feeding access for patency.
Reassessment after Enteral nutrition via nasoenteric feeding tube is blocked requiring replacement of
nutrition intervention feeding tube.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Critical illness evidence-based nutrition guideline, 2012.
http://andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=4800.. Accessed June 17, 2015.
2. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients:
administration of specialized nutrition support—issues unique to pediatrics. J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2002;26(Suppl):S97-S110.
3. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients:
access for administration of nutrition support. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(1 Suppl):33SA-41SA.
4. Kovacevich DS, Frederick A, Kelly D, Nishikawa R, Young L, American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors Standards for Specialized Nutrition Support Task Force. Standards
for specialized nutrition support: home care patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:579-590.
5. Steiger E, HPEN Working Group. Consensus statements regarding optimal management of home
parenteral nutrition (HPN) access. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(1 Suppl):S94-S95.
6. McMahon MM, Nystrom E, Braunschweig C, Miles J, Compher C, American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support of
adult patients with hyperglycemia. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:23-36.
7. Arsenault D, Brenn M, Kim S, Gura K, Compher C, Simpser E, American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition Board of Directors, Puder M. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: hyperglycemia and
hypoglycemia in the neonate receiving parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36:81-95.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.29 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-4 2/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Fasting
FASTING
Fasting (FH-2.1.5)
Definition
Absence of nutrient administration from all sources.
Fasting pattern in one calendar day, reported--defined as the timing within one calendar day when the
patient/client does not take in or infuse nutrients (e.g., overnight fast, fast between meals)
Fasting pattern in one calendar week, reported --defined as the timing within one calendar week when the
patient/client does not take in or infuse nutrients (e.g., Friday evening)
Fasting pattern in one calendar month, reported--defined as the timing within one calendar month when
the patient/client does not take in or infuse nutrients (e.g., every Sabbath)
Fasting pattern in one calendar year, reported --defined as the timing within one calendar year when the
patient/client does not take in or infuse nutrients (e.g., Lent, Passover, Ramadan, occasional fasting)
Fasting tolerance, reported—defined as the length of time a patient/client can endure a lack of nutrient
intake or nutrient infusion without physiological consequence (specify in hours)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client report,
medical record, patient/client history, food and nutrition delivery coordination of care
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate oral intake, inadequate carbohydrate intake, food- and nutrition-related knowledge
deficit, unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food- or nutrition-related topics
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Fasting tolerance, reported
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-5 1/2
12/15/21, 10:04 AM Fasting
1. Goal:Limit or avoid fasting longer than five hours because longer periods result in physiological
consequence
OR
2. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-2-1-5 2/2
12/15/21, 10:06 AM Medications
MEDICATIONS
Medications (FH-3.1)
Definition
Prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications that may impact nutritional status
Misuse of medications (e.g., accidental overdose, illegal drugs, laxatives, diuretics, drug use
during pregnancy), specify
Note: Vitamin and mineral supplements can be found on the vitamin and mineral intake reference sheets.
Alcohol is found on the Alcohol Intake reference sheet
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client report,
medical record, referring health care provider or agency
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Food–
medication interaction, increased energy expenditure, malnutrition (undernutrition), inadequate or excessive
energy, oral, fluid, carbohydrate, protein, fat, vitamin and mineral intake, unintended weight gain or loss,
overweight/obesity, underweight, disordered eating pattern
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-3-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:06 AM Medications
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Prescription medication with nutrient/food–medication interactions—Prednisone
1. Goal:Patient/client with prescription for 50 mg/d prednisone and concerned about concurrent weight
gain caused by increased appetite and fluid retention. Goal is to minimize weight gain and maintain good
nutritional status during prednisone therapy.
OR
2. Reference Standard:Not applicable
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Integration of medical nutrition therapy and
pharmacotherapy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:950-956.
3. Pronksy ZM. Food–Medication Interactions. 16th ed. Birchrunville, PA: Food–Medication Interactions;
2010.
4. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 17, 2015.
5. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes (Position Statement)–2015.
Diabetes Care. 2015;38:S1-S94.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-3-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:16 AM Complementary/Alternative Medicine
COMPLEMENTARY/ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE
Nutrition-related complementary/alternative medicine use (e.g., gingko, St. John’s Wart, elderberry,
garlic, ephedra, probiotics)
Note: Vitamin and mineral supplements can be found on the vitamin and mineral intake reference sheets.
Alcohol is found on the Alcohol Intake reference sheet
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client report,
medical record, referring health care provider or agency
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Food–
medication interaction, increased energy expenditure, malnutrition (undernutrition), unintended weight gain or
loss, overweight/obesity, intake of unsafe foods, disordered eating pattern
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Complementary/alternative medicine use—ephedra
1. Goal:Patient/client taking ephedra with the hope that it will promote weight loss. Goal is to have
patient/client eliminate ephedra for safety reasons and engage in nutrition counseling for weight
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-3-2 1/2
12/15/21, 10:16 AM Complementary/Alternative Medicine
management
OR
2. Reference Standard:Not applicable
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client complementary/alternative medicine use of ephedra is for weight loss.
with client Patient/client reports being unaware of safety concerns.
Reassessment after Patient/client complementary/alternative medicine use of ephedra has stopped and
nutrition intervention success with weight loss as a result of nutrition counseling.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Pronksy ZM. Food–Medication Interactions. 16th ed. Birchrunville, PA: Food–Medication Interactions;
2010.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 17, 2015.
4. Pediatric Weight Management Evidence Based Nutrition Practice Guideline, Adjunct Therapies.
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library.
http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=2724. Accessed June 17, 2015.
5. National Institutes of Health and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
http://nccam.nih.gov/. Accessed June 17, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-3-2 2/2
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Food and nutrition knowledge
Nutrition knowledge of community (no knowledge, minimal knowledge, basic knowledge, intermediate knowledge, advanced knowledge)—defined as the
assessed level of knowledge of a community, subpopulation, or population
Nutrition knowledge of supportive individuals (eg, family, caregivers) (no knowledge, minimal knowledge, basic knowledge, intermediate knowledge, advanced
knowledge)—defined as the assessed level of knowledge of those who give or support care
Nutrition knowledge of individual client (no knowledge, minimal knowledge, basic knowledge, intermediate knowledge, advanced knowledge)—defined as the
assessed level of knowledge of an individual client
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these indicators: Pre- and/or posttests administered orally, on paper, or by computer, scenario
discussions, client restates key information, review of food records, practical demonstration/test, survey, nutrition quotient, nutrition questionnaire, nutrition
assessment inventory
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition counseling, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit, limited
adherence to nutrition related recommendations, undesirable food choices, breastfeeding difficulty, overweight/obesity, intake domain nutrition diagnoses.
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and reference standards for a given client population and
setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for
use in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Nutrition knowledge of individual client
Initial nutrition assessment Individual client with newly diagnosed diabetes with no knowledge of carbohydrate counting. Client established a goal to learn how
with client to accurately read a food label and identify the total number of grams of carbohydrate per serving of food
Client has intermediate knowledge of how to read food labels and state grams of carbohydrate in individual food items. Client has
Reassessment after
basic knowledge of how to consistently apply this knowledge to food intake and distribution of carbohydrate throughout the day. Will
nutrition intervention
continue to monitor at next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards for the outcome; other references may be
appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Effectiveness of Nutrition Intervention Methods. https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=4756&evidence_summary_id=251212&highlight=breastfeeding&home=1. Updated 2010. Accessed February 13, 2018.
2. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Press; 2007.
3. Kessler H, Wunderlich SM. Relationship between use of food labels and nutrition knowledge of people with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1999;25(4):549-559
4. Chapman-Novakofski K, Karduck J. Improvement in knowledge, social cognitive theory variables, and movement through stages of change after a
community-based diabetes education program. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(10):1613-1616.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-1 1/1
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Food and Nutrition Skill
Nutrition skill of community (no skill, minimal skill, basic skill, intermediate skill, advanced skill)—
defined as the assessed level of skill of a community, subpopulation, or population
Nutrition skill of supportive individuals (eg, family, caregivers) (no skill, minimal skill, basic skill,
intermediate skill, advanced skill)—defined as the assessed level of skill of family and those who give or
support care
Nutrition skill of individual client (no skill, minimal skill, basic skill, intermediate skill, advanced skill)—
defined as the assessed level of skill of an individual client
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Pre- and/or post-tests
administered orally, on paper, or by computer, scenario discussions, client restates key information, review of
food records, practical demonstration, survey, nutrition questionnaire, nutrition assessment inventory
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following domains of nutrition
interventions: : Nutrition education, nutrition counseling, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: :
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit, limited adherence to nutrition related recommendations, self-
feeding difficulty, breastfeeding difficulty, intake domain nutrition diagnoses.
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for one
of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Nutrition skill of individual client
Intitial nutrition assessment Individual client with newborn infant and no nutrition skill related to breastfeeding.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-2 1/2
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Food and Nutrition Skill
Individual client established a goal to guide baby's lips and mouth for a sucessful
latch.
individual client with basic skill guiding baby's lips and mouth for successful latch.
Reassessment after
Able to demonstrate successful latch 3 out of 5 times. Will continue to monitor at
nutrition intervention
next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-2 2/2
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Beliefs and Attitudes
Nutrition priority of individual client (present/absent)—defined as the individual client’s beliefs and
attitudes about food and nutrition that are believed to be of prime concern
Conflict with individual client’s value system (present/absent)—defined as the individual client’s beliefs
and attitudes that are incongruent with the client’s values
Conflict with client’s supportive individuals’ value system (present/absent)—defined as the client’s
beliefs and attitudes that are incongruent with the values of the client’s supportive individuals (eg, family
and caregivers)
Conflict with client supportive structures’ value system (present/absent)—defined as the client’s beliefs
and attitudes that are incongruent with the values of the client’s supportive structures (eg, social service
agencies and faith based organizations)
Conflict with stakeholders’ value system (present/absent)—defined as the client’s beliefs and attitudes
that are incongruent with the values of stakeholders (eg, constituencies with impact on client nutrition)
Behavioral beliefs—defined as factors (motivation, control, norms, readiness) that influence the client’s
food- and nutrition-related behaviors
Perceived susceptibility to nutrition related health problems score (self-rated, 1=very low to 7 =
very high perceived susceptibility)—defined as a client’s belief that they have a health condition
or are at high-risk for developing a health condition
Perceived severity of risk to health score (self-rated, 1=very low to 7= very high perceived
severity of risk)—defined as a client’s belief about the severity of their risk of a health condition
Perceived benefit of nutrition related change score (self-rated, 1=very low to 7=very high
perceived benefit)—defined as the acceptance that the rewards are worth the sacrifice and effort
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-3 1/4
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Beliefs and Attitudes
Likelihood of performing nutrition related behavior score (self- rated, 1 = unlikely to perform
behavior to 7 = very likely to perform behavior)—defined as the probability of the client
performing the behavior(s)
Perceived control over nutrition related behavior score (self-rated, 1=very low to 7=very high
perceived control)—defined as the client’s belief in their power to change nutrition related
behavior(s)
Nutrition self efficacy score (self-rated, 1=very low confidence to 7 = very high confidence in
ability)—defined as the client’s confidence in their ability to change nutrition related behavior(s)
Perceived barrier to nutrition related behavior score (self-rated, 1=very low to 7=very high
perceived barriers)—defined as the client’s belief about barriers to adopting nutrition related
behaviors
Readiness to change nutrition related behavior score (self-rated on scale of 1 to 10; 1 = not ready
to 10 = fully ready to change)—defined as a client assessment of their preparedness to change
nutrition related behaviors
Negative emotions about food and nutrition (present/absent)—defined as negative feelings about food
and/or nutrition
Positive emotions about food and nutrition (present/absent)—defined as positive feelings about food
and/or nutrition
Unrealistic nutrition related goals (present/absent)—defined as client food and/or nutrition expectations
that are may not be achievable
Preoccupation with food (present absent)—defined as thoughts about food that dominate the client’s
thinking
Preoccupation with weight (present/absent)—defined as thoughts about body weight that dominate the
client’s thinking
Preoccupation with body shape (present/absent)—defined as thoughts about body shape that dominate the
client’s thinking
Negative nutrition self talk (present/absent)—defined as negative thoughts about oneself related to food
and nutrition
Positive nutrition self talk (present/absent)—defined as positive thoughts about oneself related to food
and nutrition
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-3 2/4
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Beliefs and Attitudes
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client self-report,
client assessment questionnaire or interview, medical record, referring health care provider or agency, survey
data
Typically used to monitor and evaluate change in the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food
and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition education, nutrition counseling, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food- or nutrition-related topics; not ready for diet/lifestyle change; inability
to manage self-care; self-monitoring deficit, excessive or inadequate oral, energy, macronutrient, micronutrient
or bioactive substance intake; imbalance of nutrients; intake of types of fats inconsistent with needs; intake of
types of proteins inconsistent with needs; intake of types of carbohydrate inconsistent with needs;
inadequate/excessive fiber intake; undesirable food choices; underweight; overweight/obesity; disordered eating
pattern; physical inactivity; excess physical activity; limited access to food or water
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Readiness to change nutrition related behavior stage
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.
2. Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44(9):1175-1184.
3. Case Western Reserve University. Readiness Ruler.
https://www.centerforebp.case.edu/resources/tools/readiness-ruler. Accessed February 28, 2020.
4. de Jersey SJ, Mallan KM, Callaway LK, Daniels LA, Nicholson JM. Prospective relationships
between health cognitions and excess gestational weight gain in a cohort of healthy and overweight
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-3 3/4
12/15/21, 10:17 AM Beliefs and Attitudes
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-4-3 4/4
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Adherence
ADHERENCE
Adherence (FH-5.1)
Definition
Level of congruence with nutrition-related recommendations or behavioral changes agreed upon by client to
achieve nutrition-related goals
Self reported nutrition adherence score (self rated on scale of 1 to 10; 1 = not adherent to 10 = completely
adherent)—defined as a client assessment of their congruence to agreed upon nutrition related goals
Nutrition encounter ratio (ratio) —defined as the ratio of actual nutrition encounters to the total planned
nutrition encounters
Ability to recall nutrition goals (very able to recall goals, somewhat able to recall goals, unable to recall
goals)—defined as the degree to which a client can describe previously agreed upon nutrition objectives
Nutrition self monitoring at agreed upon rate (self rated on scale of 1 to 10; 1 = not adherent to 10 =
completely adherent)—defined as a client assessment of their congruence to agreed upon nutrition related
self monitoring
Nutrition self management as agreed upon (self rated on scale of 1 to 10; 1 = not adherent to 10 =
completely adherent) —defined as a client assessment of their congruence with agreed upon nutrition
related self management
Note: Use in conjunction with appropriate Food and Nutrition Intake, Anthropometric Data, and
Biochemical Data reference sheets.
May be useful in relapse prevention treatment (analyze and control factors that caused the lapse).
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Nutrition encounter
attendance, self-monitoring records (eg, food record to evaluate fat, sodium, calories/kcal/kJ, diet quality, binge-
eating), client self-report, adherence tools or questionnaires, provider assessment, self efficacy assessment,
readiness to change assessment
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
adherence to nutrition-related recommendations, self monitoring deficity, not ready for diet/lifestyle change
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Self reported nutrition adherence score (self rated on scale of 1 to 10)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-1 1/3
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Adherence
Client rates self 4/10 on ability to adhere to meal plan developed in collaboration
with dietitian. Discussions with client regarding barrier(s) to achieving goals and
Initial encounter
strategies to improve adherence. Goal set to adhere to meal plan 5 days per week.
Client will evaluate progress toward goal at the next encounter and rate adherence.
Some progress toward goal. Client rated self 6/10 on ability to adhere to meal plan 5
Reassessment after days per week. Is doing well on weekdays, but verbalizes need to improve on
nutrition intervention weekends. Discussed strategies to improve adherence to meal plan on the weekends.
Client will monitor progress and adherence at next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Asaad G, Sadegian M, Lau R, et al. The Reliability and Validity of the Perceived Dietary Adherence
Questionnaire for People with Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5484-5496.
2. Bosworth H, Weinberger M, Oddone EZ. Patient Treatment Adherence: Concepts, Interventions, and
Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press; 2005.
3. Crowley MJ, Grubber JM, Olsen MK, Bosworth HB. Factors associated with non-adherence to three
hypertension self-management behaviors: preliminary data for a new instrument. J Gen Intern Med.
2013;28(1):99-106.
4. DiMatteo MR, Giordani PJ, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes:
a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2002;40(9):794-811.
5. Haynes RB. Improving patient adherence: State of the art, with a special focus on medication taking for
cardiovascular disorders. In: Burke LE, Ockene IS, eds. Compliance in Healthcare and Research.
Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 2001.
6. Jones CD, Holmes GM, DeWalt DA, et al. Self-reported recall and daily diary-recorded measures of
weight monitoring adherence: associations with heart failure-related hospitalization. BMC Cardiovasc
Disord. 2014;14(1):12.
7. Khalil AA, Darawad MW. Objectively measured and self-reported nonadherence among Jordanian
patients receiving hemodialysis. Hemodialysis international International Symposium on Home
Hemodialysis. 2014;18(1):95-103.
8. Lambert K, Mullan J, Mansfield K. An integrative review of the methodology and findings regarding
dietary adherence in end stage kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):318.
9. Milas NC, Nowalk MP, Akpele L, et al. Factors associated with adherence to the dietary protein
intervention in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(11):1295-
1300.
10. Raj GD, Hashemi Z, Soria Contreras DC, et al. Adherence to diabetes dietary guidelines assessed using a
validated questionnaire predicts glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Canadian journal of
diabetes. 2018;42(1):78-87.
11. Rushe H, McGee HM. Assessing adherence to dietary recommendations for hemodialysis patients: the
Renal Adherence Attitudes Questionnaire (RAAQ) and the Renal Adherence Behaviour Questionnaire
(RABQ). J Psychosom Res. 1998;45(2):149-157.
12. Sharma S, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, et al. Adherence to the food guide pyramid recommendations among
Japanese Americans, Native Hawaiians, and whites: results from the multiethnic cohort study. J Am Diet
Assoc. 2003;103(9):1195-1198.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-1 2/3
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Adherence
13. Song EK, Moser DK, Kang SM, Lennie TA. Self-reported adherence to a low-sodium diet and health
outcomes in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(6):529-534.
14. Thomson JL, Landry AS, Zoellner JM, et al. Participant adherence indicators predict changes in blood
pressure, anthropometric measures, and self-reported physical activity in a lifestyle intervention: HUB
city steps. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health
Education. 2015;42(1):84-91.
15. Tinker LF, Perri MG, Patterson RE, et al. The effects of physical and emotional status on adherence to a
low-fat dietary pattern in the Women's Health Initiative. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(6):789-800, 888.
16. Villa L, Sun D, Denhaerynck K, et al. Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-
administered measures: a retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium. Br J Gen
Pract. 2015;65(630):e9-e15.
17. Warren-Findlow J, Basalik DW, Dulin M, Tapp H, Kuhn L. Preliminary validation of the Hypertension
Self-Care Activity Level Effects (H-SCALE) and clinical blood pressure among patients with
hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013;15(9):637-643.
18. Williamson DA, Anton SD, Han H, et al. Adherence is a multi-dimensional construct in the POUNDS
LOST trial. J Behav Med. 2010;33(1):35-46.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-1 3/3
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Avoidance Behavior
AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR
Avoidance
Cause of avoidance behavior (e.g., personal choice, prescribed dietary restriction, GI distress, suspected
allergy, eating disorder, cancer treatment side effects, medications, mental illness, Parkinson’s disease)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Self-monitoring
records, patient/client interview
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Disordered eating pattern, overweight/obesity, underweight, altered GI function
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Avoidance of social situations
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-2 1/3
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Avoidance Behavior
1. Goal:Patient/client avoiding social situations in an effort to avoid overeating. Goal is to learn strategies
to control eating in social situations.
OR
2. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists
個Patient/client avoids social situations because she is afraid she will overeat.
Reviewed client’s food diary and client brainstormed strategies which may help her
Initial nutrition assessment
control eating in social situations. Patient/client will preplan food intake on days she
with client
has social engagements, will have a piece of fruit before going to help curb her
appetite and will maintain a food diary.
Patient/client made some progress toward goal. Attended 2 of 4 social engagements
Reassessment after where food was served, and successfully controlled food intake both times.
nutrition intervention Patient/client will continue to use strategies. Will reevaluate avoidance behavior at
next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Susan H. Barriers to effective nutritional care for older adults. Nurs Stand [serial online]. 2006;21:50-54.
2. Susan H. Nutrition matters for older adults. J Commun Nurs [serial online]. 2006;20:24,26,28-30.
3. Zutavern A, Brockow I, Schaaf B, Bolte G, von Berg A, Diez U, Borte M, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE,
Heinrich J, LISA Study Group. Timing of solid food introduction in relation to atopic dermatitis and
atopic sensitization: Results from a prospective birth cohort study. Pediatrics [serial online].
2006;117:401-411.
4. Ogden J, Karim L, Choudry A, Brown K. Understanding successful behaviour change: the role of
intentions, attitudes to the target and motivations and the example of diet. Health Educ Res [serial online].
2007;22:397-405.
5. Watson L, Leslie W, Hankey C. Under-nutrition in old age: diagnosis and management. Rev Clin
Gerontol [serial online]. 2006;16:23-34.
6. Brisbois TD, Hutton JL, Baracos VE, Wismer WV. Taste and smell abnormalities as an independent cause
of failure of food intake in patients with advanced cancer-an argument for the application of sensory
science. J Palliativ Care [serial online]. 2006;22:111-114.
7. Cassens D, Johnson E, Keelan S. Enhancing taste, texture, appearance, and presentation of pureed food
improved resident quality of life and weight status. Nutr Rev [serial online]. 1996;54:S51.
8. Reed PS, Zimmerman S, Sloane PD, Williams CS, Boustani M. Characteristics associated with low food
and fluid intake in long-term care residents with dementia. Gerontologist. [serial online]. 2005;45:74-80.
9. Joo SH, Wood RA. The impact of childhood food allergy on quality of life. Pediatrics: Synopsis Book:
Best Articles Relevant to Pediatric Allergy [serial online]. 2003;112:459.
10. Fält B, Granérus A, Unosson M. Avoidance of solid food in weight losing older patients with Parkinson’s
disease. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(11):1404-1412.
11. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Sampson HA. Adverse reactions to foods. Med Clin N Am. January 2006;90(1):97-
127.
12. Meyer C, Serpell L, Waller G, Murphy F, Treasure J, Leung N. Cognitive avoidance in the strategic
processing of ego threats among eating-disordered patients. Int J Eat Disord. July 2005;38(1):30-36.
13. Talley NJ. Irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2005;34(2):xi-xii,173-354.
14. Sverker A, Hensing G, Hallert C. Controlled by food—lived experiences of coeliac disease. J Hum Nutr
Diet. 2005;18(3):171-180.
15. Smith CM, Kagan SH. Prevention of systemic mycoses by reducing exposure to fungal pathogens in
hospitalized and ambulatory neutropenic patients. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(3):565-579.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-2 2/3
12/15/21, 10:22 AM Avoidance Behavior
16. Millson DS, Tepper SJ. Migraine treatment. Headache. J Head Face Pain. 2004;44(10):1059-61.
17. Brown AC, Hairfield M, Richards DG, McMillin DL, Mein EA, Nelson CD. Medical nutrition therapy as
a potential complementary treatment for psoriasis—five case reports. Alt Med Rev. 2004; 9(3):297-307.
18. Biddle J, Anderson J. Report on a 12-month trial of food exclusion methods in a primary care setting. J
Nutr Environ Med. 2002;12(1):11 17.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-2 3/3
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Bingeing and Purging Behavior
Note: Misuse of laxatives, diuretics or other drugs is found on the Medication and
Complementary/Alternative Medicine reference sheets. Amount and type of physical activity is found on
the Physical Activity reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Patient/client
interview, medical record, referring health care provider or agency, self-monitoring records
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive oral intake, disordered eating pattern, overweight/obesity
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Number of binge episodes
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-3 1/3
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Bingeing and Purging Behavior
1. Goal:Patient/client reports 3 binge eating episodes per week. Goal is to reduce binge eating to one
episode per week.
OR
2. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Fairburn CG, Wilson GT. Binge Eating:Nature, Assessment and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press;
1993.
2. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007.
3. Kellogg M. Counseling Tips for Nutrition Therapists: Practice Workbook. Philadelphia, PA: Kg Press;
2006.
4. Wonderlich SA, de Zwaan M, Mitchell JE, Peterson C, Crow S. Psychological and dietary treatments of
binge eating disorder: conceptual implications. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;34 Suppl:S58-S73.
5. Telch CF, Agras WS, Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy for binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin
Psychol. 2001;69(6):1061-1065.
6. Safer DL, Lively TJ, Telch CF, Agras WS. Predictors of relapse following successful dialectical behavior
therapy for binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;32(2):155-163.
7. Devlin MJ, Goldfein JA, Petkova E, Liu L, Walsh BT. Cognitive behavioral therapy and fluoxetine for
binge eating disorder: two-year follow-up. Obesity. 2007;15(7):1702-1709.
8. Peterson CB, Mitchell JE, Engbloom S, Nugent S, Mussell MP, Miller JP. Group cognitive-behavioral
treatment of binge eating disorder: a comparison of therapist-led versus self-help formats. Int J Eat
Disord. 1998;24(2):125-136.
9. Gorin AA, Le Grange D, Stone AA. Effectiveness of spouse involvement in cognitive behavioral therapy
for binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;33(4):421-433.
10. Ljotsson B, Lundin C, Mitsell K, Carlbring P, Ramklint M, Ghaderi A. Remote treatment of bulimia
nervosa and binge eating disorder: a randomized trial of Internet-assisted cognitive behavioural
therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(4):649-661. Epub 2006.
11. Celio AA, Wilfley DE, Crow SJ, Mitchell J, Walsh BT. A comparison of the binge eating scale,
questionnaire of eating and weight patterns-revised, and eating disorder examination with instructions
with the eating disorder examination in the assessment of binge eating disorder and its symptoms. Int J
Eat Disord. 2004;36:434-444.
12. Position of the American Dietetic Association. Nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating
disorders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1236-1241.
13. Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating
disorders. http://www.eatrightpro.org/resource/practice/position-and-practice-papers/practice-
papers/practice-paper-nutrition-intervention-in-the-treatment-of-eating-disorders. Accessed June 17,
2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-3 2/3
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Bingeing and Purging Behavior
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-3 3/3
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Mealtime Behavior
MEALTIME BEHAVIOR
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Observation, medical
record, referring health care provider or agency, caregiver observation, patient/client interview
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Self-
feeding difficulty, inadequate and excessive oral intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Percent of meal spent eating (percentage)
1. Goal:Four-year-old patient/client with inadequate food/beverage intake. Lunch meal observation revealed
less than 10% of mealtime was spent eating. Goal is to reduce environmental distractions and increase
percent of meal spent eating to 55%.
OR
2. Reference Standard: No validated standard exists
Initial nutrition assessment Lunch meal observation revealed that patient/client is highly distracted and spends
with client less than 10% of the mealtime eating.
Significant progress toward goal. Environmental distractions were minimized and
Reassessment after
caregiver eats meals with patient/client. Observation reveals that approximately
nutrition intervention
40% of mealtime is spent eating. Will monitor at next encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Powers SW, Patton SR, Byars KC, Mitchell MJ, Jelalian E, Mulvihill MM, Hovell MF, Stark LJ. Caloric
intake and eating behavior in infants and toddlers with cystic fibrosis. Diabetes Care. 2002;109(5):e75.
2. Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L. Development of the Children’s Eating Behaviour
Questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiat. 2001;42(7):963-970.
3. Chial HJ, Camilleri M, Williams DE, Litzinger K, Perrault J. Rumination Syndrome in children and
adolescents: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Pediatrics. 2003;111:158-162.
4. Fung EB, Samson-Fang L, Stallings VA, Conaway M, Liptak G, Henderson RC, Worley G, O’Donnell M,
Calvert B, Rosenbaum P, Chumlea W, Stevenson RD. Feeding dysfunction is associated with poor growth
and health status in children with cerebral palsy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:361-368,373.
5. Lucas B, Pechstein S, Ogata B. Nutrition concerns of children with autism spectrum disorders. Nutr
Focus. 2002;17:1-8.
6. Adams RA, Gordon C, Spangler AA. Maternal stress in caring for children with feeding disabilities:
implications for health care providers. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:962-966.
7. Ramsay M, Gisel EG, Boutry M. Non-organic failure to thrive: growth failure secondary to feeding-skills
disorder. Develop Med Child Neurol. 1993;35:285-297.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-4 2/2
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Social Network
SOCIAL NETWORK
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Ability to build and utilize social networks (e.g., may include perceived social support, social integration,
and assertiveness)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Self-monitoring
records, client/patient self-report, goal-tracking tools
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Intake
domain nutrition diagnoses, underweight, overweight/obesity, disordered eating pattern, undesirable food
choices, inability to manage self-care, breastfeeding difficulty, not ready for diet/lifestyle change, limited
adherence to nutrition-related recommendations
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Ability to build and utilize social support (e.g., may include perceived social support, social integration, and
assertiveness)
1. Goal:Overweight patient/client’s wife adds fat to all foods prepared at home. Goal is to reduce the
amount of fat in meals prepared at home by asking wife to not dress the salad or add fat seasoning to
vegetables before serving.
OR
2. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-5 1/2
12/15/21, 10:23 AM Social Network
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-5-5 2/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Food/Nutrition Program Participation
Food/Nutrition-Related History – Factors Affecting Access to Food and/or Food and Nutrition Related Supplies
Eligibility for government nutrition programs (yes/no)—defined as qualification status for national,
provincial, regional, or state-based nutrition programs that offer food support and/or nutrition intervention
Eligibility for community nutrition programs (yes/no)—defined as qualification status for nutrition
programs that offer food support and/or nutrition intervention
Awareness of programs offering food support and nutrition intervention (yes/no)—defined as client
ability to name or recognize programs related to the client’s needs
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report of
eligibility and enrollment, program referral completion information, client setting evaluation, survey data on
program participation rates among eligible households
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based
nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
access to food, limited access to potable water, limited access to nutrition related supplies, inadequate or
excessive energy intake, inadequate protein intake, inadequate vitamin intake, inadequate mineral intake, food
and nutrition related knowledge deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Enrollment in government nutrition programs
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Food/Nutrition Program Participation
The client’s parent was not aware of required documentation for enrollment in
Initial nutrition assessment government nutrition program (school lunch) and parent aims to complete them.
with client Will follow-up with parent and monitor change in school lunch program
participation at next encounter.
Reassessment after Progress toward goal as client’s family/guardian has completed and submitted
nutrition intervention school lunch program forms. Review for enrollment in program at future encounter.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Safe Food/Meal Availability
Food/Nutrition-Related History – Factors Affecting Access to Food and/or Food and Nutrition Related Supplies
Availability of shopping facilities (yes/no) defined as access to affordable sources of acceptable and safe
food to meet nutrition needs
Ability to procure safe food (yes/no)—defined as the capacity to source (eg, grocery stores, growing,
hunting, fishing, food relief agencies) acceptable and safe foods to select a wide variety of food to meet
nutrition needs
Access to food preparation equipment (yes/no)—defined as ability to obtain and use equipment necessary
to prepare food to meals or snacks
Ability to store food safely (yes/no)—defined as the capacity to keep food safe for consumption
Ability to identify safe food (yes/no)—defined as the capacity to select foods for consumption that are
free from spoilage or contaminants
Individual client food security level (high, marginal, low, and very low)—defined as the degree to which
an individual client in the household has reliable availability of food to meet nutrition needs from socially
acceptable sources without running out
Household food security level (high, marginal, low, and very low)—defined as the degree to which the
household has reliable availability of food to meet nutrition needs from socially acceptable sources
without running out
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report overall
food availability/food consumed during the week, referral information, setting evaluation, survey data
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrition delivery,
nutrition education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population
based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
access to food, intake of unsafe food, inadequate or excessive energy intake, inadequate or excessive oral intake,
inadequate vitamin and mineral intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-2 1/3
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Safe Food/Meal Availability
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Access to food preparation equipment (yes/no)
Initial nutrition
The client’s Access to food preparation equipment is not reliable. Will monitor change in
assessment with
access at next encounter after coordination of nutrition care with relevant professional.
client
Reassessment after
nutrition Achieved goal as client has reliable Access to food preparation equipment.
intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standard;
other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-2 2/3
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Safe Food/Meal Availability
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-2 3/3
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Safe Water Availability
Food/Nutrition-Related History – Factors Affecting Access to Food and/or Food and Nutrition Related Supplies
Availability of potable water (yes/no)—defined as ready access to water that meets guidelines for safe
drinking water
Ability to decontaminate water (yes/no)—defined as the capacity to interpret public health warnings and
use of strategies to treat water for consumption
Awareness of public health water alert (yes/no)—defined as attentiveness of warnings issued by public
health authorities regarding drinking water
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report of
potable water availability and/or decontamination strategies, referral information, setting evaluation, survey data,
government issued reports and warnings
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
access to potable water, Inadequate fluid intake, intake of unsafe water
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Awareness of public health water alert (yes/no)
Initial nutrition assessment The client has limited awareness of the current public health alert for water
decontamination (eg, community has a boil water alert for water used for drinking
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-3 1/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Safe Water Availability
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standard;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-3 2/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Food and Nutrition Related Supplies Availability
Food/Nutrition-Related History – Factors Affecting Access to Food and/or Food and Nutrition Related Supplies
Access to food and nutrition related supplies (yes/no)—defined as ability to obtain nutrition related
supplies for providing, assessing, and monitoring and evaluating nutrition interventions to administer,
self-monitor, and meet food and nutrition needs (eg, glucose monitor, monitoring strips, lancets,
pedometer, PN/EN supplies, thickeners, blood pressure-related devices)
Access to assistive eating devices (equipment or utensils), specify, e.g., modified utensils, plates, bowls,
gavage feeding supplies)
Access to assistive food preparation devices (specify, e.g., modified utensils for food preparation, electric
can openers, rocking knives, one-handed devices)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, referral
information, setting evaluation
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based
nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
availability to nutrition related supplies, inability to manage self care, inadequate oral intake, self feeding
difficulty, limited adherence to nutrition related recommendations, not ready for diet/lifestyle change, self
monitoring deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Access to food and nutrition related supplies (yes/no)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-4 1/2
12/15/21, 10:27 AM Food and Nutrition Related Supplies Availability
The client does not have access to nutrition related supplies (glucose monitoring
Initial nutrition assessment
strips). Referral to relevant professional. Will monitor change in access to nutrition
with client
related supplies (glucose monitoring strips) availability at next encounter.
Reassessment after Goal met as client met with relevant professional and has access to nutrition related
nutrition intervention supplies (glucose monitoring strips).
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standard;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-4 2/2
12/15/21, 10:28 AM Food and Nutrition Sanitation
Food/Nutrition-Related History – Factors Affecting Access to Food and/or Food and Nutrition Related Supplies
Ability to wash hands with soap and water (yes/no)–defined as the availability of handwashing facilities
and the capacity to use these facilities to reduce contamination and the spread of disease to food, water,
and nutrition related supplies
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report referral
information, setting evaluation, survey data, microorganism culture results
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrition delivery,
nutrition education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population
based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Limited
access to food, intake of unsafe food, limited access to potable water, food and nutrition related knowledge
deficit
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Ability to wash hands with soap and water (yes/no) and Availability of suitable sanitation facilities (yes/no)
Initial nutrition assessment The client has limited Ability to wash hands with soap and water prior to eating due
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-5 1/2
12/15/21, 10:28 AM Food and Nutrition Sanitation
with client to limited Availability of suitable sanitation facilities. Soap is lacking in working
environment. Client will identify suitable sanitation facility during work and use
prior to eating.
Reassessment after Client has identified suitable sanitation facilities during working hours and reports
nutrition intervention consistent Ability to wash hands with soap and water prior to eating.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standard;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-6-5 2/2
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Breastfeeding Assessment
BREASTFEEDING ASSESSMENT
Evaluation of breastfeeding ability and capacity to support the nutritional and other needs of the infant and
mother
Initiation of breastfeeding
Breastfeeding approach
Exclusive breastfeeding (yes/no)—defined as nourishment, all nutrients and fluid, provided via
breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life; permits oral vitamin and mineral supplements and
medicines
Predominant breastfeeding (yes/no)—defined as nourishment primarily from breastmilk, including
expressed mother’s or donor breastmilk; permits infant formula and other liquids, oral vitamin and
mineral supplements and medicines
Partial breastfeeding (yes/no)—defined as nourishment partially from breastmilk, including
expressed mother’s or donor breastmilk, with nourishment from infant formula and other sources
Breastfeeding Difficulties
Note: Infant/child growth can be found on the Body Composition/Growth/Weight History reference sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-1 1/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Breastfeeding Assessment
Breastfeeding self-efficacy and intention to breastfeed can be found on the Beliefs and Attitudes reference
sheet.
*If a synonym for the term “breastmilk” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “human milk.”
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report,
practitioner observation of breastfeeding, self-monitoring records, infant weight trends
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Breastfeeding difficulty, predicted breastfeeding difficulty, food and nutrition related knowledge
deficit, unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food or nutrition related topics, unintended weight loss, inadequate
fluid intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Exclusive breastfeeding (yes/no)
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Alianmoghaddam N, Phibbs S, Benn C. Reasons for stopping exclusive breastfeeding between three and
six months: A qualitative study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;39:37-43.
2. Altuntas N, Turkyilmaz C, Yildiz H, et al. Validity and reliability of the infant breastfeeding assessment
tool, the mother baby assessment tool, and the LATCH scoring system. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9(4):191-
195.
3. Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, et al. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and
research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(4):535-542.
4. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827-841.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-1 2/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Breastfeeding Assessment
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-1 3/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Nutrition Related Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
NUTRITION RELATED ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AND INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING
Physical ability to complete tasks for meal preparation (plan meals, shop for meals, finances, meal
preparation) (yes/no)
Ability to position self in relation to plate (within 12 to 18 inches (30-45 cm) from mouth to plate)
(yes/no)
Ability to use adaptive eating devices (those that have been deemed necessary and that improve self-
feeding skills) (yes/no)
Cognitive ability to complete tasks for meal preparation (planning meals, shopping for meals, finances,
meal preparation) (yes/no)
Note:Sufficient intake of food can be found on the Food Intake reference sheet.
Sufficient intake of fluid can be found on the Fluid/Beverage Intake reference sheet.
Food security and ability to maintain sanitation can be found on the Safe Food/Meal Availability
reference sheet.
Ability to maintain weight can be found on the Body Composition/Growth/Weight History reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Self-report, caregiver
report, home visit, targeted questionnaires and monitoring devices, ADL and/or IADL measurement tool,
congregate meal site attendance records
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Coordination of nutrition care by
nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inability to manage self-care, impaired ability to prepare foods/meals
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-2 1/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Nutrition Related Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Nutrition-related instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score
1. Goal:Patient/client with decreased food intake due to an inability to drive, no close relatives living in
the vicinity, and difficulty in performing meal preparation tasks due to weakness
OR
2. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists.
Patient/client with inadequate food intake due to inability to drive, no close relative
living in vicinity, subsequent weight loss and difficulties in performing ADLs and
Initial encounter with IADLs due to weakness. Patient/client is to use new strategies and community
patient/client resources to facilitate attendance at senior center congregate meals 5 times per
week, use of community-provided transportation offered to grocery store 1 x per
week, and attendance in strength training at senior center.
Significant progress in nutrition-related activities of daily living. Patient/client able
Reassessment after to attend senior center for meals and strength training 3 times this week. Goal is 5
nutrition intervention times. Will continue to assess at next encounter. Patient/client going to grocery store
1 x per week.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Kretser A, Voss T, Kerr W, Cavadini C, Friedmann J. Effects of two models of nutritional intervention on
homebound older adults at nutritional risk. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:329-336.
2. Sorbye LW, Schroll M, Finne Soveri H, Jonsson PV, Topinkova E, Ljunggren G, Bernabei R. Unintended
weight loss in the elderly living at home: the Aged in Home Care Project (AdHOC). J Nutr Health Aging.
2008;12:10-16.
3. Folstein M, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive
state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198.
4. Russell C. Dining Skills: Practical Interventions for Caregivers of Older Adults with Eating Problems.
Chicago, IL: Consultant Dietitians in Health Care Facilities, A Dietetic Practice Group of the American
Dietetic Association; 2001.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-2 2/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Nutrition Related Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-2 3/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Physical Activity
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Indicators
Consistency (yes/no)
Intensity (e.g., talk test, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion, % of predetermined max heart rate)
Handgrip strength (Normal, Measurably Reduced) defined as a proxy measure of upper extremity
muscle function
Other sedentary activity time (e.g., commuting; sitting at desk, in meetings, at sporting or arts events)
(minutes/day)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: History
interview/questionnaire, physical activity log, step counter, accelerometer, attendance at strength training,
balance training (for older adults), and/or aerobic classes, caretaker records, medical record, dynamometer
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Physical inactivity, excessive exercise, underweight, overweight/obesity, unintended weight loss or weight gain
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-3 1/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Physical Activity
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Consistency and duration
1. Goal:Patient/client typically walks approximately 10 minutes, twice per week. Patient/client goal is to
walk approximately 15 minutes, 5 days per week.
OR
2. Reference Standard:Patient/client’s typical 10-minute walk, twice a week is well below the
recommended at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity (in bouts 10 minutes or longer),
5 days per week or at least 20 minutes of vigorous intensity physical activity (in bouts 10 minutes or
longer), 3 days per week (ACSM/AHA Physical Activity Guidelines for Public Health for adults and
seniors)
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson
PD, Bauman A. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the
American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exer.
2007;39:8:1423-1434.
2. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C.
Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports
Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2007;39:8:1435-1445.
3. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stands. http://www.acsm.org/access-public-
information/position-stands. Accessed June 17, 2015.
4. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growing
Stronger–Strength Training for Older Adults.
http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/growingstronger/index.html. Accessed June 17, 2015.
5. American College of Sports Medicine. Exercise and the older adult. https://www.acsm.org/docs/current-
comments/exerciseandtheolderadult.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2015.
6. Exercise Guidelines During Pregnancy. American Pregnancy Association.
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/exerciseguidelines.html. Accessed June 17, 2015.
7. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-3 2/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Physical Activity
8. American Society of Hand Therapists. Clinical Assessment Recommendations, 3rd Edition. 2013.
9. Aging In Motion Coalition Announces Establishment of ICD-10-CM Code for Sarcopenia by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention [press release]. Washington, DC: Aging in Motion Coalition; 2016.
http://aginginmotion.org/news/2388-2/. Accessed February 15, 2017.
10. Becker PJ, Nieman Carney L, Corkins MR, Monczka J, Smith E, Smith SE, Spear BA, White JV.
Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition: Indicators recommended for identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition
(undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1988-2000.
11. Bohannon, R. W., Bear-Lehman, J., Desrosiers, J., Massy-Westropp, N., & Mathiowetz, V. (2007).
Average grip strength: a meta-analysis of data obtained with a Jamar dynamometer from individuals 75
years or more of age. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy (2001), 30(1), 28–30. Retrieved from
http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?
dbfrom=pubmed&id=19839178&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/1BFC0354-
A179-431C-B0AF-46CE8F748F75. Accessed February 15, 2017.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-3 3/3
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Factors Affecting Access to Physical Activity
Neighborhood safety (the client’s perception of crime and traffic, presence of gangs, witness to physical
attacks, presence of community members walking or playing outside and feeling it is safe to walk outside.
Client rate on a scale of 1 to 10, 1=Unsafe, 10=Safe)
Walkability of neighborhood (the client’s perception on his/her ability to walk in a neighborhood related
to street connectivity, road type, dwelling density, and land use attributes (i.e., residential, commercial,
institutional or industrial land use). Client rate on a scale of 1 to 10, 1=Not walkable, 10=Very walkable)
Proximity to parks/green space (the client’s perception of the distance from the client's home/workplace
to the nearest park/green space. Client rate on a scale of 1 to 10, 1=Large distance to nearest park/green
space, 10=Small distance to nearest park/green space)
Access to physical activity facilities/programs (the client’s perception of the availability of physical
activity facilities/programs in the client’s environment. Client rate on a scale of 1 to 10, 1=No availability
of facilities/programs, 10=Excellent availability of facilities/programs)
Note: Physical disability, mobility and socioeconomic factors affecting physical activity can be
documented in the in Personal data (CH-1.1) and Social history (CH-3.1).
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client perception,
neighborhood crime statistics, neighborhood traffic statistics, geographic information systems data to map a
neighborhood, availability of retail establishments within walking distance
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling and coordination of care
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, not ready for diet/lifestyle change
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Neighborhood safety
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-4 1/2
12/15/21, 10:29 AM Factors Affecting Access to Physical Activity
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Childhood obesity and the built
environment. https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=4558&evidence_summary_id=251313&highlight=environment&home=1. Accessed February 12,
2018.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-7-4 2/2
12/15/21, 10:30 AM Nutrition Quality of Life
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Nutrition Quality of
Life measurement tool, other quality of life tools
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
supplements, nutrition education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:Poor
nutrition quality of life, inadequate or excessive energy or macronutrient intake, underweight, unintended weight
loss, overweight/obesity, unintended weight gain, disordered eating pattern, inability to manage self-care,
swallowing difficulty, chewing difficulty, self-feeding difficulty, altered GI function, limited access to food.
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Nutrition quality of life score
1. Goal:Patient/client with chronic renal disease currently reports poor nutrition quality of life, especially
decreased walking ability (physical) and limited food choices on renal diet (food impact). The goal of
medical nutrition therapy is to educate and coach patient and his family on options and strategies to
significantly enhance his nutrition quality of life.
2. OR
3. Reference Standard:No validated standard exists.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-8-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:30 AM Nutrition Quality of Life
Patient/client with chronic renal disease reports poor nutrition quality of life,
Initial encounter with particularly in physical and food impact aspects. Patient/client to receive intensive
patient/clientx medical nutrition therapy with a goal to improve client’s overall nutrition quality of
life over a 6-month period. Will monitor nutrition quality of life in 6 months.
Some progress toward goal. Patient/client’s nutrition quality of life is increased, but
Reassessment after
further improvement is desired in the physical dimension. Will continue medical
nutrition intervention
nutrition therapy and reassess in 3 months.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Barr JT, Schumacher GE. The need for a nutrition-related quality-of-life measure. J Am Diet Assoc.
2003;103:177–180.
2. Barr JT, Schumacher GE. Using focus groups to determine what constitutes quality of life in clients
receiving medical nutrition therapy: first steps in the development of a nutrition quality-of-life survey. J
Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:844-851.
3. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework
and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
4. Moorehead M, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, Oria H. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality
of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684-692.
5. Groll D, Vanner S, Depew W, DaCosta L, Simon J, Groll A, Roblin N, Paterson W. The IBS-36: a new
quality of life measure for irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:962-971.
6. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality
of life measure for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Diabetes Care. 1988;11:725-
732.
7. Position of the American Dietetic Association. Individualized nutrition approaches for older adults in
health care communities. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1554-1563.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeFH-8-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
Height
Defined as measures of a body’s length, typically from head to foot.
Weight
Defined as measures of a body’s mass, heaviness or lightness of a body.
Measured weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as measured body weight.
Stated weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as reported body weight.
Stated peak weight (lb, kg). Defined as reported maximum body weight.
Measured peak weight (lb, kg). Defined as the measured maximum body weight.
Usual stated body weight (UBW) (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the reported body weight that is
typical for the individual.
UBW percentage (%). Defined as the calculation using actual body weight divided by usual
weight and then multiplied by 100.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 1/6
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
Birth weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the measured body weight at birth.
Stated pre-pregnancy weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the reported weight prior to pregnancy.
Dosing weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the calculated body weight that may be used to
determine the appropriate dose for medications, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, and IVs.
Estimated dry weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the estimated body weight without excess
fluid volume (euvolemic).
Pre-amputation measured weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the measured body weight prior to
removal of a limb or part of a limb.
Pre-amputation estimated weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the estimated body weight prior to
removal of a limb or part of a limb.
Post-amputation measured weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the measured body weight after
removal of a limb or part of a limb.
Post-amputation estimated weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the estimated body weight after
removal of a limb or part of a limb.
Pre-dialysis weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as measured body weight prior to dialysis.
Post-dialysis weight (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as measured body weight after dialysis.
Frame
Defined as estimate of a body frame based upon height and wrist measure.
Weight change
Defined as measures of the difference in body weight typically over time.
Weight gain (lb, kg, oz, g). Defined as the measured increase in body weight over a specified
period of time.
Weight loss (lb, kg, oz, g). Defined as the measured decrease in body weight over a specified
period of time.
Weight change percentage (%). Defined as the weight change value divided by the original
weight and multiplied by 100.
Measured interdialytic weight gain (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the measured increase in body
weight between dialysis treatments.
Measured interdialytic weight loss (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as the measured decrease in body
weight between dialysis treatments.
Weight change intent (intentional/unintentional). Defined as the purpose of weight gain or
weight loss.
Measured gestational weight gain (lb, oz, kg, g). Defined as measured weight increase during
pregnancy.
Measured gestational weight loss (lb, oz, kg, g) Defined as measured weight decrease during
pregnancy.
Body mass
Defined as measures of a body’s weight relative to height.
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2). Defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square height
in meters.
BMI prime ratio (ratio). Defined as the ratio of actual BMI to the upper limit BMI of 25.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 2/6
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
Body fat percentage (%). Defined as the portion of the body attributed to body fat and
excludes muscle, fluids, bone, or organs.
Body fat percentage technique. Defined as the tool used to estimate body fat.
Body surface area (m2). Defined as the measured surface area of a human body.
Calculated body surface area (m2). Defined at the calculated surface area of a human body.
Bone age (years). Defined as the degree of maturation of a child’s skeleton.
Bone mineral density t score (t score). Defined as the measure of minerals in bone compared
with a healthy young adult of the same sex.
Bone mineral density z score (z score). Defined as the measure of minerals in bone compared
with a person of the same age, sex, weight, and ethnic or racial origin.
Bone mineral density technique. Defined as the test to measure bone mineral density.
Mid arm muscle circumference (in/cm). Defined as the measure of the muscle area of the
upper arm.
Mid arm muscle circumference percentile (percentile). Defined as the rank of the muscle area
of the upper arm.
Triceps skin fold thickness (in/cm). Defined as measure of the fold of skin taken over the
tricep muscle.
Triceps skin fold percentile (percentile). Defined as the percentile rank of the skin fold
thickness over the tricep muscle.
Triceps skin fold z score (z score). Defined as the standard deviation score for the skin fold
thickness over the tricep muscle.
Waist circumference (in/ cm). Defined as the circumference around the waist measured at the
umbilicus.
Waist circumference narrowest point (in/ cm). Defined as the circumference around the waist
measured at the narrowest point.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 3/6
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
Waist circumference iliac crest (in/ cm). Defined as the circumference around the waist
measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the least palpable rib and the top of the
iliac crest.
Hip circumference (in/cm). Defined as the circumference of the hips measure at the widest
portion of the buttocks.
Waist to hip ratio (ratio). Defined as the calculated waist circumference measurement divided
by the hip measurement.
Mid upper arm circumference (in/cm). Defined as the circumference of the upper right arm
measured between the tip of the shoulder and the tip of the elbow.
Mid upper arm circumference, left arm (in/cm). Defined as the circumference of the upper left
arm measured between the tip of the shoulder and the tip of the elbow.
Mid upper arm circumference z score (z score). Defined as the standard deviation score for
mid upper arm circumference.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators:Referring health care
provider or agency, direct measurement, patient/client report, medical record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate intake of energy, fat, protein, carbohydrate, alcohol, and/or mineral intake; underweight,
overweight, physical inactivity, excessive exercise
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Weight change/day
BMI percentile/age
1. Goal: The infant is only gaining, on average, 10 grams per day compared with a goal weight gain of 20 to
30 grams per day.
OR
2. Reference Standard: Child’s (> age 3 years) BMI percentile/age per growth curves has crossed 2
percentile channels from 50% to 10% in last 6 months.
Child’s BMI percentile/age per growth curves has crossed 2 percentile channels
Initial nutrition assessment
from 50% to 10% in last 6 months. Will monitor BMI percentile/age at next
with client
encounter.
Reassessment after
Child’s BMI percentile/age per growth curves is unchanged from baseline measure.
nutrition intervention\
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. McDowell MA, Fryar CD, Hirsch R, Ogden CL. Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and
Adults: US Population, 2007-2010. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2012.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 4/6
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 5/6
12/15/21, 10:35 AM Body Composition/Growth/Weight History
26. Samson-Fang LJ, Stevenson RD. Identification of malnutrition in children with cerebral palsy: poor
performance of weight-for-height centiles. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2000;42:162-
168.
27. Zemel BS, Riley EM, Stallings VA. Evaluation of methodology for nutritional assessment in children:
anthropometry, body composition, and energy expenditure. Ann Rev Nutr. 1997;17:211-235.
28. Mitchell CO, Lipschitz DA. Arm length measurement as an alternative to height in the nutrition
assessment of the elderly.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982;6:226-229.
29. Cronk CE, Stallings VA, Spender Q, Ross JL, Widdoes HD. Measurement of short-term growth with a
new knee height-measuring device. Am J Hum Biol. 1989;31(2):206-14.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAD-1-1 6/6
12/15/21, 10:41 AM Acid Base Balance
Biochemical Data, Medical Tests and Procedures– Biochemical and Medical Tests
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
pH (number
Venous pH (number)
Note: Sodium and chloride can be found on the Electrolyte and Renal Profile reference sheet
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Altered
nutrition-related laboratory values
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
pH, serum (number)
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s pH is 7.48, which is above expected range. Will monitor change in
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:41 AM Acid Base Balance
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:42 AM Electrolyte and Renal Profile
Note: Bicarbonate can be found on the Acid Base Balance reference sheet.
Serum albumin can be found on the Protein Profile reference sheet for adjustment of serum calcium.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of protein or minerals
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Potassium (mEq/L)
1. Goal: A goal of serum K+ 3.5 to 5.5 mEq/L in patient/client on medications that block the renin-
angiotensin system.
OR
2. Reference Standard: The patient/client’s potassium is 2.9 mEq/L, which is below (above, below, within
expected range) the expected range (3.5 to 5.0 mEq/L).
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s serum potassium is 2.9 mEq/L, which is below the expected range.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-2 1/2
12/15/21, 10:42 AM Electrolyte and Renal Profile
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 16, 2015.
3. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35(6):S1-S104.
4. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI Workgroup. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI Guidelines on
bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4 Suppl 3):S1-S201.
5. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive
agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(5 Suppl 1)S1-S290).
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-2 2/2
12/15/21, 10:42 AM Essential Fatty Acid Profile
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report/record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate intake of fat, parenteral nutrition; parenteral nutrition composition inconsistent with
needs; parenteral nutrition administration inconsistent with needs; altered nutrition-related laboratory values;
impaired nutrient utilization
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Triene:Tetraene ratio (ratio number)
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s Triene:Tetraene ratio is 0.45, above the expected range (essential
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-3 1/2
12/15/21, 10:42 AM Essential Fatty Acid Profile
with client fatty acid deficiency). Will monitor change in Triene:Tetraene ratio at next
encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward the expect range. Patient/client’s Triene:Tetraene ratio is
nutrition intervention 0.1.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Hise ME, Brown JC. Lipids. In: Gottschlich MM, ed. The ASPEN Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A
Case-Based Approach—The Adult Patient. Silver Spring, MD:ASPEN;2007:48-70.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.24 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-3 2/2
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Gastrointestinal Profile
GASTROINTESTINAL PROFILE
Toxicology report, including alcohol (by report) Gastric emptying time (minutes)
Fecal fat, 72 hour (g/24 hours)x Modified barium swallow (by report)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-4 1/3
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Gastrointestinal Profile
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Altered nutrition-related laboratory values, excess intake of protein or fat
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators
Indicator(s) Selected
Ammonia, serum (µg/dL)
1. {GLT:goal)?The patient/client’s serum ammonia is 105 µg/dL, which is above the goal (< 75 µg/dL) for
this patient/client with end-stage liver disease.
OR
2. Reference Standard: The patient/client serum ammonia is 85 µg/dL which is above (above, below, or
percent of) the expected range (11-35 µg/dL).
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s serum ammonia is 85 µg/dL, above the expected range. Will monitor
with client change in serum ammonia at next encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward expected range. Patient/client’s serum ammonia 45
nutrition intervention µg/dL.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-4 2/3
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Gastrointestinal Profile
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.25 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-4 3/3
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Glucose/Endocrine Profile
GLUCOSE/ENDOCRINE PROFILE
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Biochemical measurement, laboratory
report
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of carbohydrate, energy; less than optimal intake of types of
carbohydrate; or inconsistent carbohydrate intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-5 1/2
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Glucose/Endocrine Profile
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
HgbA1c (%, mmol/mol)
1. Goal: The patient/client’s HgbA1c is 7.8% (60 mmol/mol), which is above the expected limit, but is an
acceptable goal in a pediatric patient.
OR
2. Reference Standard:The patient/client’s HgbA1c is 11% (97 mmol/mol), which is above (above, below,
expected limit or range) the expected limit (< 6%, 42 mmol/mol).
Sample Nutrition Patient/client’s HgbA1c is 9% (75 mmol/mol), which is above the expected limit.
Assessment Documentation Will monitor change in HgbA1c at next encounter.
Reassessment after
Regression from the expected limit. Patient/client’s HgbA1c is 10% (86 mmol/mol).
nutrition intervention
* If a synonym for the term “Glucose, casual” is helpful or needed, an approved alternative is “Glucose,
random.”
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care; 2012;35:S11-
S63.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Critical illness evidence-based nutrition guideline.
http://andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=4800. Accessed May 13, 2014.. Accessed June 16,
2015.
3. International Diabetes Center. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. 2012. http://www.idf.org/global-
guideline-type-2-diabetes-2012. Accessed May 13, 2014.. Accessed June 16, 2015.
4. Joslin Diabetes Center. Clinical Guidelines. https://www.joslin.org/info/joslin-clinical-
guidelines.html. Accessed June 16, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-5 2/2
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Inflammatory Profile
INFLAMMATORY PROFILE
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators:Direct measurement,
medical record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Increased nutrient need; less than
optimal intake of types of fats inconsistent with needs; excessive physical activity
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
Nutrition assessment with ?Patient/client’s C-reactive protein level is 4.0 mg/L, which is above (above, below,
patient/client within expected range) the expected range of 1.0 to 3.0 mg/L.
References:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-6 1/2
12/15/21, 10:45 AM Inflammatory Profile
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. NHLBI Workshop Report. C-Reactive Protein: Basic and Clinical Research Needs.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/research/reports/2006-crp. Accessed June 16, 2015.
2. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Dietary fatty acids for healthy adults. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2014;114:136-153.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-6 2/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Lipid Profile
LIPID PROFILE
LDL:HDL (ratio)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report, patient/client report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of fat, energy
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-7 1/3
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Lipid Profile
1. Goal?The patient/client’s LDL cholesterol is 200 mg/dL, compared to a goal of < 100 mg/dL. (Note:
While reference standards are generally used for laboratory measures, a goal might be used in a special
situation such as this example. The patient/client has a familial hypercholesterolemia where a normal
reference standard may not be realistic.)
OR
2. Reference Standard?The patient/client’s LDL cholesterol is 159 mg/dL, which is above the expected limit
of the NHLBI recommendation of < 100 mg/dL.
The patient/client LDL cholesterol is 159 mg/dL compared to the reference standard
Initial nutrition assessment
(e.g., National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute) recommended level of < 100
with client
mg/dL. Will monitor LDL cholesterol at next encounter.
Reassessment after Some progress toward goal/reference standard as patient/client’s LDL cholesterol is
nutrition intervention 145 mg/dL.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Grundy S, Cleeman JI, Bairey Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith
SC, Stone NJ, for the Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program, Endorsed
by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American College of Cardiology Foundation, and
American Heart Association. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol
Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239.
2. Ingelsson E, Schaefer EJ, Contois JH, McNamara JR, Sullivan L, Keyes MJ, Pencina MJ, Schoonmaker
C, Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS. Clinical utility of different lipid measures for prediction of
coronary heart disease in men and women. JAMA. 2007; 298(7): 776-785.
3. Nam BH, Kannel WB, D’Agostino RB. Search for an optimal atherogenic lipid risk profile: from the
Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol. February 1, 2006;97(3):372-5.
4. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Third Report of the
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Cholesterol in Adults, May 2001.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/current/cholesterol-guidelines/final-report. Accessed June
16, 2015.
5. National Kidney Foundation, K/DOQI Guidelines.
https://www.kidney.org/professionals/guidelines/guidelines_commentaries. Accessed June 16, 2015
6. Onder G, Landi F, Volpato S, Fellin R, Carbonin P, Gambassi G, Bernabei R. Serum cholesterol levels
and in-hospital mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 2003;115:265-271.
7. Position of the American Dietetic Association. Nutrition Intervention and Human Immunodeficiency
Virus Infection. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1105-1119.
8. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Cook NR, Bradwin G, Buring JE. Non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and
B100, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios, and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in
women. JAMA. 2005;294(3):326-333.
9. Wang TD, Chen WJ, Chien KL, Seh-Yi Su SS, Hsu HC, Chen MF, Liau CS, Lee YT. Efficacy of
cholesterol levels and ratios in predicting future coronary heart disease in a Chinese population. Am J
Cardiol. 2001;88(7):737-743.
10. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Dietary fatty acids for healthy adults. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2014;114:136-153.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-7 2/3
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Lipid Profile
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-7 3/3
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Metabolic Rate Profile
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Note: Use of RQ is considered valid if respiratory factors (hyper- or hypoventilation), equipment failure,
measurement protocol violations, or operator errors have not occurred.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Direct measurement
(indirect calorimetry), medical record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate intake of parenteral/enteral nutrition; enteral/parenteral nutrition composition or
administration inconsistent with needs; excessive energy intake; excessive mineral intake; disordered eating
pattern; excessive exercise, increased energy expenditure, increased nutrient needs (energy), inadequate protein-
energy intake.
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Respiratory quotient
1. Reference Standard: A client on parenteral nutrition support with an RQ of 1.04, which is above (above,
below, within expected range) the expected range (0.7 to 1.0) with no apparent errors in the measurement
2. Recommendation: Not applicable
3. Goal: Not applicable
Client’s RQ is 1.04, with energy intake from parenteral nutrition 400 kcal (1700 kJ)
higher than measured metabolic rate. No apparent respiratory factors (hyper- or
Initial encounter
hypoventilation), equipment failure, measurement protocol violations, or operator
errors. Will adjust content of parenteral nutrition and re-measure RQ.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-8 1/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Metabolic Rate Profile
Reassessment after RQ has dropped to 0.92 with no apparent measurement error. Metabolic rate and
nutrition intervention calorie/ kcal/kJ intake are matched. Parenteral nutrition has been appropriately
adjusted to equal client’s energy requirement.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Adult weight management guideline
(2014). https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5276. Accessed February 20, 2019.
2. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L. Best practice methods to apply to measurement of
resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(6):881-903.
3. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159-
211.
4. Mehta NM, Skillman HE, Irving SY, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(5):706-742.
5. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27(1):21-26.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-8 2/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Mineral Profile
MINERAL PROFILE
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Manganese, urinary excretion (µg/L or nmol/L), blood (µg/L or nmol/L), plasma (µg/L or nmol/L
Note: Other measures of body mineral status, such as urinary manganese excretion, are provided to offer
complete information in the reference sheet. These are rarely used in practice, but may be warranted in
limited circumstances.
Serum calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium can be found on the Electrolyte and Renal
Profile reference sheet.
Serum iron, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation can be found on the Nutritional Anemia Profile
reference sheet.
Thyroid stimulating hormone ( ↑ TSH as an indicator of excess iodine supplementation) can be found on
the Glucose/ Endocrine Profile reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory record
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate intake of minerals, parenteral nutrition
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-9 1/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Mineral Profile
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Zinc, plasma (µg/dL
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s plasma zinc is 40 µg/dL, which is below the expected range for
with client adults. Will monitor change in plasma zinc at next encounter.
Reassessment after
Goal/reference standard achieved as patient/client’s plasma zinc is 90 µg/dL.
nutrition intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2001.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-9 2/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Nutritional Anemia Profile
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, patient/client laboratory record; national/state/local nutrition monitoring and surveillance data
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate intake of vitamins or minerals (e.g., iron, B12, folate); altered nutrition-related
laboratory values; impaired nutrient utilization
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Hemoglobin (gm/dL)
Serum ferritin (ng/mL)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-10 1/2
12/15/21, 10:49 AM Nutritional Anemia Profile
1. {GLT:goal: The patient/client’s hemoglobin and hematocrit are below the expected limits for adult males,
but are within the goal range for a patient/client receiving hemodialysis.
OR
2. Reference Standard: The patient/client’s serum ferritin is 8 ng/mL, which is below (above, below, or
within expected range) the expected range for adult females.
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s serum ferritin is 8 ng/mL, which is below the expected range for
with client adult females. Will monitor change in serum ferritin at next encounter.
Reassessment after
Patient/client’s serum ferritin is 10.9 ng/mL, within the expected range.
nutrition intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency
anemia in the United States. MMWR. 2002;51:897-899.
3. Johns Hopkins Hospital. The Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers. 17th ed.
St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2005.
4. National Kidney Foundation, Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. Anemia in chronic kidney disease.
http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_commentaries.cfm. Accessed June 16, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-10 2/2
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Protein Profile
PROTEIN PROFILE
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-11 1/4
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Protein Profile
Lysine:arginine (ratio)
Note: Methylmalonic acid can be found on the Nutritional Anemia Profile reference sheet. Also, In the
past, hepatic transport protein measures (e.g. albumin and prealbumin) were used as indicators of
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-11 2/4
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Protein Profile
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Increased nutrient needs, malnutrition, inadequate enteral/parenteral nutrition infusion
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Prealbumin (mg/dL)
Initial nutrition assessment Patient/client’s prealbumin is 7.0 mg/dL, below the expected range (16 to 40
with client mg/dL) for adults. Will monitor change in prealbumin at next encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward expected range as patient/client’s serum prealbumin is
nutrition intervention 13.0 mg/dL.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. ADA Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American
Dietetic Association; 2009.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
June 16, 2015.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Celiac Disease Evidenced-based Nutrition Practice Guideline.
http://andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=1403. Accessed June 16, 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-11 3/4
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Protein Profile
4. Fuhrman MP, Charney P, Mueller CM. Hepatic proteins and nutrition assessment. J Am Diet Assoc.
2004;104:1258-1264.
5. Garcia-Cazorla A, Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency: metabolic characteristics and new neurological
aspects, Ann Neurol. 2006;59:121-127.
6. Kerr DS The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and tricarboxylic acid cycle in Fernandes J, Saudubray
JM, Tada K (eds): Inborn metabolic diseases, diagnosis and treatment; 2nd edition; Berlin, Springer
Verlag 1996; :109-119.
7. National Kidney Foundation, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition in Chronic Renal Failure, 2000.
https://www.kidney.org/professionals/guidelines/guidelines_commentaries. Accessed June 16, 2015.
8. Tanaka KR, Pyruvate kinase and other enzymopathies of the erythrocyte, The metabolic and molecular
bases of inherited disease, 7th Ed; Editors: C.R.Scriver, A.L.Beaudet, W.S.Sly, D.Valle; McGraw-Hill Inc.
1995;2:3485-3511.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.24 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-11 4/4
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Urine Profile
URINE PROFILE
Urine volume (mL/24 hours; however, in certain populations, eg, infants, this indicator may be reported
in number of wet diapers/day)
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Observation,
biochemical measurement, laboratory report, client report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Inadequate or excessive fluid intake; inadequate or excessive enteral/parenteral nutrition infusion;
inadequate or excessive mineral intake; inadequate or excessive bioactive substance intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Urine specific gravity (number)
1. Reference Standard: The client’s urine specific gravity is 1.050, which is above (above, below, within
expected range) the expected range (1.003 to 1.030).
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-12 2/3
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Urine Profile
Client’s urine specific gravity is 1.050, which is above the expected range. Will
Initial encounter
monitor change in urine specific gravity at next encounter.
Reassessment after Significant progress toward goal, client’s urine specific gravity is 1.035, which is
nutrition intervention within the expected range.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-12 3/3
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Vitamin Profile
VITAMIN PROFILE
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Riboflavin, activity coefficient for erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity (IU/g hemoglobin)
Biotinidase (U/L)
Note: Other measures of body vitamin status, such as urinary pantothenate excretion, are provided to
offer complete information in the reference sheet. These are rarely used in practice, but may be warranted
in limited circumstances.
Measures for folate and Vitamin B12 can be found on the Nutritional Anemia Profile reference sheet.
Measures related to Vitamin K (PT, PTT, INR) can be found on the GI Profile reference sheet.
A test for Choline is not available. According to the DRIs, it should be evaluated in light of serum alanine
amino transferase (ALT) levels which can be found on the GI Profile (BD-1.4).
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, patient/client record
typically-used-with: Food and/or nutrient delivery, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Excessive or inadequate intake of vitamins
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-13 1/3
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Vitamin Profile
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected:
Vitamin A, serum retinol (µg/dL)
Patient/client’s serum retinol is 95 µg/dL, which is above the expected range. Will
Initial nutrition assessment
monitor change in serum retinol at next encounter, along with vitamin A and beta-
with client
carotene intake.
Reassessment after
Significant progress toward expected range. Patient/client’s retinol is 70 µg/dL.
nutrition intervention
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-13 2/3
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Vitamin Profile
9. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate,
Vitamin B12, Pantothenic acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;1998.
10. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2001.
11. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-13 3/3
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Carbohydrate Metabolism Profile
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Lactate/pyruvate (ratio)
Note: Other measures of metabolic conditions, such as, Pyruvate are listed on the Protein profile (BD-
1.11) reference sheet.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report, patient/client report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
Nutrition education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:Intake
of types of carbohydrate inconsistent with needs, Inadequate energy intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Galactose 1 phosphate in red blood cells (mg/dL or µmol/L)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-14 1/2
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Carbohydrate Metabolism Profile
1. Goal: The patient/client’s galactose-1-phosphate in RBCs is 165 mg/dL, which is above the goal for
patients with galactosemia on diet (> 125 mg/dL ). (Note: While reference standards are generally used
for laboratory measures, a goal might be used in a special situation such as this example where a
population reference standard may not be realistic.)
OR
2. Reference Standard: The patient/client’s galactose-1-phosphate in RBCs is 165 mg/dL, which is above the
upper limit for patients with galactosemia on diet (>125 mg/dL).
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-14 2/2
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Fatty Acid Profile
Nutrition-Assessment-and-Monitoring-and-Evaluation
Indicators
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Biochemical
measurement, laboratory report, patient/client report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
Nutrition education, nutrition counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: Intake
of types of fat inconsistent with needs, Inadequate energy intake
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Evaluation
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-15 1/2
12/15/21, 10:53 AM Fatty Acid Profile
Indicator(s) Selected
Fatty acid panel mitochondrial C8-C18 (specifically Octanoylcarnitine [C8] and Octanoylcarnitine
[C8]:Decanoylcarnitine [C10] ratio)
1. Goal: The patient/client’s Octanoylcarnitine is 0.8 µmol/L, which is above the goal of 0.3 µmol/L and a
ratio of Octanoylcarnitine:Decanoylcarnitine is 10, which is above the goal of 5 for this patient/client with
MCAD. (Note: While reference standards are generally used for laboratory measures, a goal might be
used in a special situation such as this example where a population reference standard may not be
realistic.)
OR
2. Reference Standard: The patient/client’s Octanoylcarnitine is 0.8 µmol/L, which is above the expected
upper limit (>0.3µmol/L) and ratio of Octanoylcarnitine:Decanoylcarnitine is 10, which is above the
upper limit (>5).
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Abdenur JE. MCAD deficiency. Acylcarnitines (AC) by tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) are useful
to monitor dietary treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1999;466:353-363.
2. Iafolla, AK. Medium chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: Clinical course in 120 affected
children J Pediatr 1994;124:409-415.
3. MorrisAM, Spiekerkoetter U. .Disorders of Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Oxidation and Related Metabolic
Pathways". In Saudubray JM; van den Berghe G, Walter JH.. Inborn MetabolicDiseases: Diagnosis and
Treatment (5th ed.). 2012. New York: Springer. pp. 201–216.
4. Rinaldo P, O'Shea JJ, Coates PM, Hale DE, Stanley CA, Tanaka K. Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA
Dehydrogenase Deficiency". New Eng J Med. 1988; 319: 1308–1313.
5. Walter JH. Tolerance to fast: Rational and practical evaluation in children with hypoketonaemia. J Inherit
Metab Dis. 2009; 32: 214–217.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeBD-1-15 2/2
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Overall findings
Asthenia (weakness)
Buffalo hump
Cachexia
Cushingoid appearance
Ectomorph
Endomorph
Lethargic
Mesomorph
Neglect of personal hygiene
Obese
Short stature for age
Tall stature
Body language that may suggest discomfort with interaction (eg, frowning, crossed arms, limited eye
contact)
Adipose
Atrophy of orbital fat
Excess subcutaneous fat
Loss of subcutaneous fat
Central adiposity
Loss of subcutaneous triceps fat
Loss of subcutaneous biceps fat
Loss of subcutaneous fat overlying the ribs
Lipodystrophy
Bones
Bow legs
Frontal bossing
Harrison’s sulcus
Rachitic rosary
Rickets
Scoliosis
Acromion abnormal prominence
Bone widening at ends
Clavicle abnormal prominence
Rib abnormal prominence
Scapula abnormal prominence
Spine abnormal prominence
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 1/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Cardiovascular-pulmonary system
Absent breath sounds
Bradycardia
Bradypnea (slow respiration)
Decreased breath sounds
Dyspnea ( shortness of breath)
Increased breath sounds
Normal breath sounds
Tachypnea
Tachycardia
Respiratory crackles (rales)
Digestive system
Abdominal bloating
Abdominal cramping
Abdominal distension
Abdominal pain
Absence of bowel sounds
Anorexia (loss of appetite)
Ascites
Bulky stool
Constipation
Decrease in appetite
Diarrhea
Early satiety
Epigastric pain
Excessive appetite
Excessive belching
Excessive flatus
Fatty stool
Heartburn
Hyperactive bowel sounds
Hypoactive bowel sounds
Increased appetite
Liquid stool
Loose stool
Nausea
Normal bowel sounds
Retching
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal drainage volume
Gastric drainage volume
Bile duct drainage volume
Pancreatic drainage volume
Chylous drainage volume
Wound drainage volume
Intestinal fistula drainage volume
Normal stool
Edema
+1 pitting edema
+2 pitting edema
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 2/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
+3 pitting edema
+4 pitting edema
Anasarca
Ankle edema
Edema of calf
Edema of eyelid
Edema of foot
Edema of the hand
Edema of the scrotum
Edema of thigh
Edema of the vulva
Mucosal edema
Sacral edema
Extremities
Amputated foot
Amputated hand
Amputated leg
Athetoid movement
Decreased range of ankle movement
Decreased range of cervical spine movement
Decreased range of elbow movement
Decreased range of finger movement
Decreased range of foot movement
Decreased range of hip movement
Decreased range of knee movement
Decreased range of lumbar spine movement
Decreased range of shoulder movement
Decreased range of subtalar movement
Decreased range of thumb movement
Decreased range of toe movement
Decreased range of thoracic spine movement
Decreased range of wrist movement
Hypertonia
Hypotonia
Joint arthralgia (joint pain)
Lower limb spasticity
Peripheral cyanosis
Spasticity
Tetany
Upper limb spasticity
Pes planus
Eyes
Abnormal vision
Angular blepharitis
Bitot’s spots
Circles under eyes
Corneal arcus
Conjunctival discoloration
Conjunctival hemorrhage
Conjunctival keratinization
Excessive tear production
Keratomalacia
Jaundiced sclera
Night blindness
Ophthalmoplegia
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 3/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Sunken eyes
Xerophthalmia
Xanthelasma
Pale conjunctiva
Genitourinary
Amenorrhea
Anuria
Delay in sexual development and/or puberty
Menorrhagia
Oliguria
Polyuria
Hair
Abnormal keratinization of hair follicle
Alopecia
Brittle hair
Corkscrew hairs
Dry hair
Fine hair
Follicular hyperkeratosis
Hair changes due to malnutrition
Hair lacks luster
Hypertrichosis
Increased loss of hair
Nutritional hair color change
White hair
Easily pluckable hair
Lanugo hair formation
Head
Altered olfactory sense
Anosmia (loss of sense of smell)
Bulging fontanelle
Epistaxis
Headache
Hyposmia (decreased sense of smell)
Macrocephaly
Microcephaly
Nasal mucosa dry
Sunken fontanelle
Hand and nails
Beau's lines
Clubbing of nail
Flaking of nails
Koilonychia (spoon shaped nails)
Leukonychia
Longitudinal grooving of nails
Muehrcke’s lines
Nail changes
Palmar erythema
Ridged nails
Splits in nails
Thin nails
Trachyonychia (brittle nails)
Splinter hemorrhages under nail
White flecks in nails
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 4/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Mouth
Ageusia (loss of taste)
Angular stomatitis
Aphthous ulcer of mouth
Aptyalism (xerostomia)
Blue lips
Blue line on gingiva
Candidiasis of the mouth
Cheilosis (dry lips)
Cheilitis
Cleft palate
Cracked lips
Drooling
Dry mucous membranes
Dysgeusia
Excessive salivation
Excessive thirst
Gingival hypertrophy
Gingivitis
Halitosis (breath smells unpleasant)
Hemorrhagic gingivitis (bleeding gums)
Hypogeusia
Ketotic breath
Micrognathia
Swollen gums
Oral candidiasis
Oral lesion
Parotid swelling
Poor oral hygiene
Retains food in mouth
Stomatitis
Uremic breath
Pale gums
Cleft lip
Muscles
Muscle atrophy
Muscle contracture
Muscle cramp
Muscle pain
Muscle weakness
Quadricep muscle atrophy
Deltoid muscle atrophy
Gastrocnemius (calf) muscle atrophy
Gluteal muscle atrophy
Interosseous hand muscle atrophy
Latissimus dorsi muscle atrophy
Pectoral muscle atrophy
Temporalis muscle atrophy
Trapezius muscle atrophy
Neck
Goiter (thyroid enlargement)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 5/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 6/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Teeth
Baby bottle tooth decay
Broken denture
Broken teeth
Dental caries
Dental fluorosis
Dental plaque
Denture loose
Denture lost
Denture present
Edentulous
Erosion of teeth
Impaired dentition
Ill fitting denture
Mottling of enamel
Partially edentulous mandible
Partially edentulous maxilla
Rampant dental caries
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 7/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
Tongue
Atrophy of tongue papillae
Beefy red tongue
Difficulty moving tongue
Dry tongue
Glossitis
Glossodynia (painful tongue)
Hypertrophy of tongue papillae
Lesion of the tongue
Macroglossia
Strawberry tongue
Short frenulum of tongue
Split frenulum of tongue
Blue tongue
Cracked tongue
Magenta tongue
Pale tongue
Vital signs
Blood pressure, systolic
Blood pressure, diastolic
Blood pressure, systolic, reported
Blood pressure, diastolic, reported
Heart rate
Jugular venous pressure
Mean arterial pressure
Pulse rate
Respiratory rate
Temperature
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Direct observation,
client report, health record, physician referral
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of care, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Excessive or inadequate intake of vitamins/minerals, fiber, fluid, parenteral/enteral nutrition; overweight/obesity,
underweight, unintended weight loss, malnutrition (undernutrition)
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Muscle atrophy
Loss of subcutaneous fat
1. Reference Standard: The client’s muscle atrophy and subcutaneous fat loss are consistent with mild
undernutrition in the context of acute illness or injury, which is consistent with the nutrition diagnosis of
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 8/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
non-severe (moderate) malnutrition. Normal reference standard is no muscle atrophy and fat pads slightly
bulged.
2. Recommendation: The client maintains or gains muscle and subcutaneous fat (as appropriate) as
determined by a nutrition focused physical exam.
3. Goal: Client establishes goal to consume a mid-afternoon snack of whole milk yogurt on 5 of 7 days per
week.
Client’s muscle atrophy and subcutaneous fat loss is mild, which is consistent with
non-severe (moderate) malnutrition. Client establishes goal to consume a mid-
Initial encounter
afternoon snack of whole milk yogurt on 5 of 7 days per week. Will review client
intake log. Will monitor changes in muscle and subcutaneous fat status in 3 months.
Progress toward maintaining or gaining of muscle mass and (as appropriate)
Reassessment after
subcutaneous fat. Nutrition focused physical exam reveals client’s muscle and
nutrition intervention
subcutaneous fat status is improved over the last 3 months.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards;
other references may be appropriate.
1. Al-Dabagh A, Milliron BJ, Strowd L, Feldman SR. A disease of the present: scurvy in "well-
nourished" patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(5):e246-e247.
2. Armstrong S, Lazorick S, Hampl S, et al. Physical examination findings among children and
adolescents with obesity: An evidence-based review. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20151766.
3. Brescoll J, Daveluy S. A review of vitamin B12 in dermatology. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(1):27-
33.Charney P, Malone A. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 3rd
ed. Chicago, IL: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2015.
4. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional
status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.
5. Etani Y, Nishimoto Y, Kawamoto K, et al. Selenium deficiency in children and adolescents nourished
by parenteral nutrition and/or selenium-deficient enteral formula. J Trace Elem Med Biol.
2014;28(4):409-413.
6. Esper DH. Utilization of nutrition-focused physical assessment in identifying micronutrient
deficiencies. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(2):194-202.
7. Fossitt DD, Kowalski TJ. Classic skin findings of scurvy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(7):e61.
8. Green Corkins K. Nutrition-focused physical examination in pediatric patients. Nutr Clin Pract.
2015;30(2):203-209.
9. Jimenez M, Giovannucci E, Krall Kaye E, Joshipura KJ, Dietrich T. Predicted vitamin D status and
incidence of tooth loss and periodontitis. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(4):844-852.
10. Lai KL, Ng JY, Srinivasan S. Xerophthalmia and keratomalacia secondary to diet-induced vitamin
A deficiency in Scottish adults. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(1):109-112.
11. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J
Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920-924.
12. Mordarski BA, Hand RK, Wolff J, Steiber AL. Increased knowledge, self-reported comfort, and
malnutrition diagnosis and reimbursement as a result of the nutrition-focused physical exam hands-on
training workshop. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(11):1822-1828.
13. Pailhous S, Lamoureux S, Caietta E, et al. Scurvy, an old disease still in the news: two case reports.
Arch Pediatr. 2015;22(1):63-65.
14. Pipkorn R, Leon C, Crouse J, et al. Role of nutrition focused physical exam (NFPE) in the
identification of malnutrition in pediatric patients. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(9):A13.
15. Radler DR, Lister T. Nutrient deficiencies associated with nutrition-focused physical findings of the
oral cavity. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013;28(6):710-721.
16. Robinson GE, Cryst S. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2018 standards of practice and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 9/10
12/15/21, 10:55 AM Nutrition Focused Physical Findings
standards of professional performance for registered dietitian nutritionists (competent, proficient, and
expert) in post-acute and long-term care nutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1747-1760.e1753.
17. Schroth RJ, Levi JA, Sellers EA, Friel J, Kliewer E, Moffatt ME. Vitamin D status of children with
severe early childhood caries: a case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:174.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.24 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codePD-1-1 10/10
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Personal Data
PERSONAL DATA
Nutrition Assessment:
Indicators
Age*** Language***
Age in days (neonates)*** English***
Age in months (up to 36 months)*** Spanish***
Age in years*** Other (specify)***
Other (e.g., age adjusted)***
Literacy factors***
Gender*** Language barrier***
(as the behavioral, cultural, or psychological Low literacy***
traits typically associated with one sex)
Education***
Female***
Years of education (Year of
Male***
education)***
Sex***
Role in family***
(as female or male based upon reproductive
Specify***(client's reported role, e.g.,
organs and structures)
mother, cousin, in the description of
Female***
his/her family)
Male***
Tobacco use***
Race ***
Yes***
(A group of people connected by common
Average number cigarettes
descent or origin)
smoked per day
American Indian or Alaska Native***
(number/day)***
Asian***
Total number of other
Black or African American***
tobacco products used/day
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
(number/day)***
Islander***
Number years tobacco
White***
products used on a regular
Other***
basis (years)***
Ethnicity*** No***
(pertaining to or having common racial, cultural,
Physical disability***
religious, or linguistic characteristics)
Eyesight impaired***
Hispanic or Latino***
Hearing impaired***
Not Hispanic or Latino***
Other (specify)***
Other***
Mobility***
House bound***
Bed or chair bound***
Tremors (Parkinson’s)***
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-1-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Personal Data
Other (specify)***
***Denotes indicator is used for nutrition assessment only. Other indicators are used for both nutrition
assessment and nutrition monitoring and evaluation.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, health
record, referring health care provider or agency, surveys, administrative data sets
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: N/A
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one or more of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation
for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Age, sex and education level
Client is a 40-year-old male with new onset type 2 diabetes, 7th grade education
Initial nutrition assessment
level
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment, 3rd Ed.
3rd ed. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2015.
2. Leonberg BL. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Pediatric Nutrition Assessment. 2nd
ed. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2013.
3. National Institutes of Health. NIH Policy on Reporting Race and Ethnicity Data: Subjects in Clinical
Research. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-01-053.html. Accessed March 5, 2020.
4. Johnson-Askew WL, Gordon L, Sockalingam S. Practice paper of the American Dietetic Association:
addressing racial and ethnic health disparities. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(3):446-456.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-1-1 2/2
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Patient/Client or Family Nutrition-Oriented Medical/Health History
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Amenorrhea*** Other***
Lactating***
Mastitis***
Perimenopausal/postmenopausal***
Pregnant***
Gestational age
(weeks)***
Single fetuses***
Multiple fetus (specify)***
Other (specify)***
***Denotes indicator is used for nutrition assessment only. Other indicators are used for both nutrition
assessment and nutrition monitoring and evaluation.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Medical record,
referring health care provider or agency
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Nutrition education, nutrition
counseling
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: All
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for one of
the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Initital Nutrition Client with history of cardiovascular disease. Recommend the diet in accordance
Assessment with client preference and values, the reference standards, and health condition.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
3. Charney P, Malone A. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment. 3rd
ed. Chicago, IL: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-2-1 2/3
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Patient/Client or Family Nutrition-Oriented Medical/Health History
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020
Dietary Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 13,
2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-2-1 3/3
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Treatments/Therapy
TREATMENTS/THERAPY
Treatments/Therapy (CH-2.2)
Definition
Documented medical or surgical treatments that may impact nutritional status of the client
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Medical treatment/therapy***
Chemotherapy***
Dialysis***
Mechanical ventilation/oxygen therapy***
Ostomy (specify)***
Radiation therapy***
Other (specify, eg, speech, Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy)***
Surgical treatment***
***Denotes indicator is used for nutrition assessment only. Other indicators are used for both nutrition
assessment and nutrition monitoring and evaluation.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client interview,
health record, referring health care provider or agency
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses:
Impaired nutrient utilization, increased nutrient needs, altered gastrointestinal function, biting/chewing
(masticatory) difficulty, unintended weight loss.
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for one of
the indicators)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-2-2 1/2
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Treatments/Therapy
Indicator(s) Selected
Radiation therapy
Client receiving radiation therapy for lung cancer, experiencing decreased appetite
Initial nutrition assessment
due to fatigue and pain with eating.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment, 3rd Ed.
3rd ed. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2015.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-2-2 2/2
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Social History
SOCIAL HISTORY
Nutrition Assessment
Indicators
Urban***
Rural***
Limited exposure to sunlight (vitamin
D)***
Other (specify)***
***Denotes indicator is used for nutrition assessment only. Other indicators are used for both nutrition
assessment and nutrition monitoring and evaluation.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, health
record, referring health care provider or agency
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-3-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:59 AM Social History
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: All
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example(s) of one or two of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial assessment documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Living/housing situation and Geographic location of home
Client is house bound, lives in a rural area, and receives one meal/day from home
Initial nutrition assessment
delivery program.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Charney P, Malone A. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Nutrition Assessment, 3rd Ed.
3rd ed. Chicago: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2015.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics. https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCH-3-1 2/2
12/15/21, 11:09 AM Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation Tool Ratings
Subjective global assessment (SGA) rating (A Well nourished, B Moderately [or suspected of being]
malnourished, C Severely malnourished)—defined as a nutrition assessment rating reflecting a valid
assessment of overall nutrition status and the risk of or presence of malnutrition in adults of all ages based
upon recent change in intake, weight change, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional status, metabolic
demand of disease, and physical exam parameters, related to fat and muscle mass loss, and fluid retention
Patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) rating (Stage A Well nourished, Stage B
Moderate/Suspected malnutrition, Stage C Severely malnourished)—defined as a nutrition assessment
rating reflecting a valid assessment of overall nutrition status and the risk of or presence of malnutrition
in adults of all ages based upon recent change in intake, weight change, gastrointestinal symptoms,
functional status, clinical symptoms, metabolic demand of disease, and physical exam parameters. The
tool includes both client and practitioner components
Mini nutritional assessment long form (MNA-LF) rating (Normal nutritional status, At risk of
malnutrition, Malnourished)—defined as a nutrition assessment rating reflecting a valid assessment of
overall nutrition status and the risk of or presence of malnutrition in adults aged > 65 years based upon
weight change, intake, functional status, psychological stressors or problems, and clinical exam
parameters
Subjective global nutritional assessment (SGNA) for children rating (normal nutrition, moderate
malnutrition, severe malnutrition)—defined as a nutrition assessment rating reflecting a valid assessment
of nutritional status of children+
+ Alternate approaches to interpretation of anthropometric measurements are recommended for children.
Therefore, this tool should be used in conjunction with the evidence-based anthropometric measurement
assessment criteria.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, health
records, practitioner observation, nutrition focused physical findings, self-monitoring records, survey data
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Acute disease or injury related malnutrition, chronic disease or injury related malnutrition, starvation
related malnutrition, unintended weight loss, disordered eating pattern, inadequate intake diagnoses
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-1 1/3
12/15/21, 11:09 AM Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation Tool Ratings
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) rating and Patient generated subjective global
assessment (PG-SGA) score
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Wesson DE, et al. Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and
objective measurements. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(16):969-972.
2. Baker JP, Detsky AS, Whitwell J, Langer B, Jeejeebhoy KN. A comparison of the predictive value of
nutritional assessment techniques. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1982;36(3):233-241
3. Belanger V, McCarthy A, Marcil V, et al. Assessment of malnutrition risk in Canadian pediatric hospitals:
A multicenter prospective cohort study. J Pediatr. 2019;205:160-167.e166.
4. Canadian Malnutrition Task Force. Subjective Global Assessment Form.
http://nutritioncareincanada.ca/sites/default/uploads/files/SGA%20Tool%20EN%20colour_2017(1).pdf.
Accessed March 2, 2020.
5. Compan B, di Castri A, Plaze JM, Arnaud-Battandier F. Epidemiological study of malnutrition in elderly
patients in acute, sub-acute and long-term care using the MNA. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3(3):146-151
6. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.
7. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini Nutritional Assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the
nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts Res Gerontol. 1994;4(suppl 2):15-59.
8. Kuzuya M, Kanda S, Koike T, Suzuki Y, Satake S, Iguchi A. Evaluation of Mini-Nutritional Assessment
for Japanese frail elderly. Nutrition. 2005;21(4):498-503.
9. Kwon YE, Kee YK, Yoon CY, et al. Change of nutritional status assessed using subjective global
assessment is associated with all-cause mortality in incident dialysis patients. Medicine (Baltimore).
2016;95(7):e2714.
10. Matsuyama M, Bell K, White M, et al. Nutritional assessment and status of hospitalized infants. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65(3):338-342.
11. Minocha P, Sitaraman S, Choudhary A, Yadav R. Subjective global nutritional assessment: A reliable
screening tool for nutritional assessment in cerebral palsy children. Indian J Pediatr. 2018;85(1):15-19.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-1 2/3
12/15/21, 11:09 AM Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation Tool Ratings
12. Ong SH, Chee WSS, Lapchmanan LM, Ong SN, Lua ZC, Yeo JX. Validation of the subjective global
nutrition assessment (SGNA) and screening tool for the assessment of malnutrition in paediatrics
(STAMP) to identify malnutrition in hospitalized malaysian children. J Trop Pediatr. 2019;65(1):39-45.
13. Secker DJ, Jeejeebhoy KN. Subjective global nutritional assessment for children. Am J Clin Nutr.
2007;85(4):1083-1089.
14. Secker DJ, Jeejeebhoy KN. How to perform subjective global nutritional assessment in children. J Acad
Nutr Diet. 2012;112(3):424-431.
15. Vermilyea S, Slicker J, El-Chammas K, et al. Subjective global nutritional assessment in critically ill
children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37(5):659-666.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-1 3/3
12/15/21, 11:09 AM Household Food Security Assessment Tool Scores
US household food security module six item short form raw score (0-6)—defined as the sum of
affirmative household responses to the six questions in the module
US household food security module six item short form scale score (0 = NA, 1 = 2.86, 2 = 4.19, 3 = 5.27,
4 = 6.30, 5 = 7.54, 6 [evaluated at 5.5] = 8.48)—defined as the degree to which a client is food secure
based on the overall pattern of responses to the set of indicator questions
Food insecurity experience scale (FIES) raw score (numerical score)—defined as an interval measure of
the severity of food insecurity and makes it possible to produce measures of food insecurity at the
individual or household level that are comparable across countries and contexts
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators:Survey data, program
records
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination and referral of nutrition care, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Underweight, overweight/obesity, growth rate below expected, limited food acceptance, undesirable
food choices, intake of unsafe food, limited access to food
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
US household food security module six item short form raw score (0-6)
US household food security module six item short form raw score of 2, low food
Initial encounter
security. Tool was administered to client at public health center.
Reassessment after US household food security module six item short form raw score of 1, marginal
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-2 1/2
12/15/21, 11:09 AM Household Food Security Assessment Tool Scores
nutrition intervention food security. Tool was administered to client at public health center. Client’s food
security has improved.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Ballard TJ, Kepple AW, Cafiero C. The food insecurity experience scale: development of a global
standard for monitoring hunger worldwide. Technical Paper. Rome, Italy: FAO;2013.
2. Food insecurity experience scale: Developing a global standard for monitoring hunger worldwide.
http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/voh/FIES_Technical_Paper_v1.1.pdf. Accessed February 15,
2019.
3. Harrison GG, Sharp M, Manolo-LeClair G. Food security among California’s low-income adults
improves, but most severely affected do not share in improvement. UCLA Center for Health Policy
Research. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36b7k2sb. Accessed February 15, 2019.
4. Measuring Food Security in the United States. https://fns-
prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/FSGuide.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2019.
5. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form, Economic Research Service,
USDA, September 2012. https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8282/short2012.pdf. Accessed February 15,
2019.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-2 2/2
12/15/21, 11:10 AM Food Variety Assessment Tool Scores
Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-W) indicator score (0-10)— defined as a dichotomous
indicator of whether or not women of reproductive age (15–49) years have consumed at least five out of
ten defined food groups the previous day or night. The proportion of women in a population who reach
this minimum can be used as a proxy indicator for micronutrient adequacy. Scores are aggregated for a
population of women rather than used as measures for an individual
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators:Survey data, program
records, client report
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery, nutrition
education, nutrition counseling, coordination and referral of nutrition care, population based nutrition action
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition
diagnoses: Underweight, overweight/obesity, growth rate below expected, food and nutrition related knowledge
deficit, limited food acceptance, undesirable food choices, intake of unsafe food, limited access to food
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of documentation for
one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-W) indicator score
Client (population) survey responses Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-
Initial encounter
W) indicator score 4, diversity not achieved.
Client (population) survey responses Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-
Reassessment after
W) indicator score 6, diversity achieved. Client has shown improvement in dietary
nutrition intervention
diversity indicator.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-3 1/2
12/15/21, 11:10 AM Food Variety Assessment Tool Scores
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Chakona G, Shackleton C. Minimum dietary diversity scores for women indicate micronutrient adequacy
and food insecurity status in South African towns. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):812.
2. Food and Agricultural Association of the United Nations. Minimum dietary diversity for women: A guide
to measurement. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5486e.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2019.
3. Savy M, Martin-Prevel Y, Sawadogo P, Kameli Y, Delpeuch F. Use of variety/diversity scores for diet
quality measurement: relation with nutritional status of women in a rural area in Burkina Faso. Eur J Clin
Nutr. 2005;59(5):703-716.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeAT-3 2/2
12/15/21, 11:15 AM Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification
Purpose
To ensure clear communication of the known root cause of a nutrition diagnosis and to link an effective nutrition
intervention resolve or mitigate the problem.
Indicators
Beliefs–Attitudes Etiology— defined as a cause or contributing risk factors related to the conviction of
the truth of some nutrition-related statement or phenomenon; feelings or emotions toward that truth or
phenomenon and activities.
Cultural Etiology—defined as a cause or contributing risk factors related to the client’s values, social
norms, customs, religious beliefs, and/or political systems.
Knowledge Etiology— defined as a cause or contributing risk factors impacting the level of
understanding about food, nutrition and health, or nutrition-related information and guidelines.
Physical Function Etiology— defined as a cause or contributing risk factors related to physical ability to
engage in specific tasks; may be cognitive in nature.
Social–Personal Etiology—defined as a cause or contributing risk factors associated with the client’s
personal and/or social history.
Access Etiology—defined as a cause or contributing risk factors that affect intake and the availability of
safe, healthful food, water, and food/nutrition-related supplies. A more specific root cause of Access
Etiologies may not be known but may eventually reveal Beliefs-Attitudes, Cultural, Knowledge, Physical
Function, Psychological, Social–Personal, or Treatment Etiologies.
Behavior Etiology—defined as a cause or contributing risk factors related to actions which influence
achievement of nutrition-related goals. A more specific root cause of Behavior Etiologies may not be
known but may eventually reveal Beliefs-Attitudes, Cultural, Knowledge, Physical Function,
Psychological, Social-Personal, or Treatment Etiologies.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, survey
data
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
Education, Counseling, Coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, Population based nutrition
action
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEY-1 1/3
12/15/21, 11:15 AM Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: all
nutrition diagnoses
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Accompanying nutrition diagnoses should be assessment and communication of the etiology category. This aids
in evaluation of the appropriateness of the nutrition intervention planned and executed. Examples below show
the etiology category clearly associated with the PES statement or included in the PES statement. Either
approach is acceptable.
Inadequate oral intake related to reduced appetite, altered taste, pain, and sore mucosa due to radiotherapy
treatment as evidenced by 4% weight loss in 3 weeks and consuming < ½ of meals.
Self monitoring deficit related to limited adherence with insulin regimen and blood glucose readings [behavior
etiology] as evidenced by skipping mealtime insulin and no blood glucose values/readings documented.
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit related to recent relocation [knowledge etiology] as evidenced by
community survey revealing 40% of population reports not knowing where to purchase fresh fruits and
vegetables.
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Chui TK, Proano GV, Raynor HA, Papoutsakis C. A nutrition care process audit of the national
quality improvement dataset: Supporting the improvement of data quality using the ANDHII platform. J
Acad Nutr Diet. 2019.
2. Enrione EB, Reed D, Myers EF. Limited agreement on etiologies and signs/symptoms among
registered dietitian nutritionists in clinical practice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(7):1178-1186.
3. Murphy WJ, Yadrick MM, Steiber AL, Mohan V, Papoutsakis C. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Health Informatics Infrastructure (ANDHII): A pilot study on the documentation of the nutrition care
process and the usability of ANDHII by registered dietitian nutritionists. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2018;118(10):1966-1974.
4. Swan WI, Pertel DG, Hotson B, et al. Nutrition care process (NCP) update part 2: Developing and
using the NCP terminology to demonstrate efficacy of nutrition care and related outcomes. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2019;119(5):840-855.
5. Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, et al. Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: Toward
Realizing People-Centered Care and Outcomes Management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(12):2003-2014.
6. Thompson KL, Davidson P, Swan WI, et al. Nutrition care process chains: the "missing link"
between research and evidence-based practice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(9):1491-1498.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEY-1 2/3
12/15/21, 11:15 AM Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEY-1 3/3
12/15/21, 11:17 AM Intervention goal status
New goal identified—defined as the goal identified in Nutrition Intervention planning and was not
identified in the previous Nutrition Intervention planning
Goal discontinued—defined as the need for the goal no longer exists because the conditions or situation
has changed and goal is no longer appropriate
Goal not achieved—defined as there is no overall progress toward or away from a goal
Some digression away from goal—defined as no overall progress toward the goal and progress overall is
worsening
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Client report, survey
data
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Food and/or nutrient delivery,
Education, Counseling, Coordination of nutrition care by nutrition professional, Population based nutrition
action
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: all
nutrition diagnoses
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example(s)
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
New goal and Some progress toward goal
1. Reference Standard:Varies depending on the target value (eg, intake, behavior change) of the goal.
2. Recommendation: Varies depending on the target value (eg, intake, behavior change) of the goal.
3. Goal: Varies depending on the client preference.
Initial Client identified a goal that they will increase estimated vegetable serving intake in 24 hours
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEV-1 1/2
12/15/21, 11:17 AM Intervention goal status
encounter (FH-1.1.2.1.1.3) to two vegetable servings with lunch on five of seven days per week by next
encounter in 3 weeks. [New goal].
Reassessment Client identified that they have made some progress toward goal of increasing estimated
after nutrition vegetable serving intake in 24 hours (FH-1.1.2.1.1.3) by eating two vegetable servings with
intervention lunch on three of seven days per week. [Some progress toward goal]
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Chui TK, Proano GV, Raynor HA, Papoutsakis C. A nutrition care process audit of the national
quality improvement dataset: Supporting the improvement of data quality using the ANDHII platform. J
Acad Nutr Diet. 2019.
2. Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, et al. Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: Toward
Realizing People-Centered Care and Outcomes Management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(12):2003-2014.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEV-1 2/2
12/15/21, 11:18 AM Nutrition diagnosis status
Purpose
To ensure clear communication of the progress toward resolution of each nutrition diagnosis.
New nutrition diagnosis—a nutrition diagnosis identified that was not identified in any nutrition
diagnoses made in the previous assessment.
Active nutrition diagnosis—the signs and symptoms in the nutrition diagnosis require nutrition
intervention and monitoring and evaluation to meet the goal.
Resolved nutrition diagnosis—the signs and symptoms identified in the nutrition diagnosis have met or
exceeded the goal.
Discontinued nutrition diagnosis—the nutrition diagnosis no longer exists because the client’s condition
or situation has changed. The client’s current assessment data no longer support this nutrition diagnosis.
Examples of the measurement methods or data sources for these outcome indicators: Not applicable
Typically used with the following domains of nutrition interventions: Not applicable
Typically used to determine and to monitor and evaluate change in the following nutrition diagnoses: All
Judgment must be used to select indicators and determine the appropriate measurement techniques and
reference standards for a given client population and setting. Once identified, these indicators, measurement
techniques, and reference standards should be identified in policies and procedures or other documents for use
in client records, quality or performance improvement, or in formal research projects.
Client Example
Example of one (or more) of the Nutrition Care Indicators (includes sample initial and reassessment of
documentation for one of the indicators)
Indicator(s) Selected
New nutrition diagnosis; Active nutrition diagnosis
Examples
Altered nutrition related laboratory values: decreased serum potassium related to Severe illness related pediatric
malnutrition as evidenced by serum potassium 2.9 mEq/L. [New nutrition diagnosis] (Physiologic metabolic
etiology)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEV-2 1/2
12/15/21, 11:18 AM Nutrition diagnosis status
Altered nutrition related laboratory values: decreased serum magnesium related to Severe illness related
pediatric malnutrition as evidenced by serum magnesium 1.1 mEq/L. [New nutrition diagnosis] (Physiologic
metabolic etiology)
Growth rate below expected related to insufficient enteral nutrition and oral feeding prior to admission (PTA) as
evidenced by Length for age z score -4.0, Weight for age z score -5.1, and Weight for length z score -2. [Active
nutrition diagnosis] (Treatment etiology)
References
The following are some suggested references for indicators, measurement techniques, and reference standards
for the outcome; other references may be appropriate.
1. Swan WI, Pertel DG, Hotson B, et al. Nutrition care process (NCP) update part 2: Developing and
using the NCP terminology to demonstrate efficacy of nutrition care and related outcomes. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2019;119(5):840-855.
2. Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, et al. Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: Toward
Realizing People-Centered Care and Outcomes Management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(12):2003-2014.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeEV-2 2/2
Nutrition Diagnostic Terminology
Each term is designated with an alpha-numeric NCPT hierarchical code, followed by a five-digit (e.g., 99999) Academy SNOMED CT/LOINC unique identifier
(ANDUID). Neither should be used in nutrition documentation. The ANDUID is for data tracking purposes in electronic health records.
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
INTAKE (NI) ❑ Intake of types of fats inconsistent with needs NI-5.5.3 10854
Actual problems related to intake of energy, nutrients, fluids, bioactive substances through (specify) _______________________________
oral diet or nutrition support Protein (5.6)
Energy Balance (1) ❑ Inadequate protein intake NI-5.6.1 10666
Actual or estimated changes in energy (calorie/kcal/kJ) balance ❑ Excessive protein intake NI-5.6.2 10667
❑ Increased energy expenditure NI-1.1 10633 ❑ Intake of types of proteins inconsistent with NI-5.6.3 10855
❑ Inadequate energy intake NI-1.2 10634 needs
❑ Excessive energy intake NI-1.3 10635 (specify) _______________________________
❑ Predicted inadequate energy intake NI-1.4 10636 Amino Acid (5.7)
❑ Predicted excessive energy intake NI-1.5 10637 ❑ Intake of types of amino acids inconsistent with NI-5.7.1 12007
Oral or Nutrition Support Intake (2) needs
Actual or estimated food and beverage intake from oral diet or nutrition support compared (specify) _______________________________
with client goal Carbohydrate and Fiber (5.8)
❑ Inadequate oral intake NI-2.1 10639 ❑ Inadequate carbohydrate intake NI-5.8.1 10670
❑ Excessive oral intake NI-2.2 10640 ❑ Excessive carbohydrate intake NI-5.8.2 10671
❑ Inadequate enteral nutrition infusion NI-2.3 10641 ❑ Intake of types of carbohydrate inconsistent with NI-5.8.3 10856
❑ Excessive enteral nutrition infusion NI-2.4 10642 needs
❑ Enteral nutrition composition inconsistent with NI-2.5 11142 (specify) _______________________________
needs ❑ Inconsistent carbohydrate intake NI-5.8.4 10673
❑ Enteral nutrition administration inconsistent with NI-2.6 11143 ❑ Inadequate fiber intake NI-5.8.5 10675
needs ❑ Excessive fiber intake NI-5.8.6 10676
❑ Inadequate parenteral nutrition infusion NI-2.7 10644 Vitamin (5.9)
❑ Excessive parenteral nutrition infusion NI-2.8 10645 ❑ Inadequate vitamin intake (specify) NI-5.9.1 10678
❑ Parenteral nutrition composition inconsistent NI-2.9 11144 ❑ A (1) 10679
with needs
❑ C (2) 10680
❑ Parenteral nutrition administration inconsistent NI-2.10 11145
with needs ❑ D (3) 10681
❑ Limited food acceptance NI-2.11 10647 ❑ E (4) 10682
Fluid Intake (3) ❑ K (5) 10683
❑ Thiamin (6) 10684
Actual or estimated fluid intake compared with client goal
❑ Riboflavin (7) 10685
❑ Inadequate fluid intake NI-3.1 10649
❑ Niacin (8) 10686
❑ Excessive fluid intake NI-3.2 10650
❑ Folate (9) 10687
Bioactive Substances (4)
❑ B6 (10) 10688
Actual or estimated intake of bioactive substances, including single or multiple functional
food components, ingredients, dietary supplements, alcohol ❑ B12 (11) 10689
❑ Inadequate bioactive substance intake NI-4.1 10859 ❑ Pantothenic acid (12) 10690
❑ Inadequate plant stanol ester intake NI-4.1.1 11077 ❑ Biotin (13) 10691
❑ Inadequate plant sterol ester intake NI-4.1.2 11078 ❑ Excessive vitamin intake (specify) NI-5.9.2 10693
❑ Inadequate soy protein intake NI-4.1.3 11080 ❑ A (1) 10694
❑ Inadequate psyllium intake NI-4.1.4 11079 ❑ C (2) 10695
❑ Inadequate beta glucan intake NI-4.1.5 11076 ❑ D (3) 10696
❑ Excessive bioactive substance intake NI-4.2 10653 ❑ E (4) 10697
❑ Excessive plant stanol ester intake NI-4.2.1 11084 ❑ K (5) 10698
❑ Excessive plant sterol ester intake NI-4.2.2 11085 ❑ Thiamin (6) 10699
❑ Excessive soy protein intake NI-4.2.3 11087 ❑ Riboflavin (7) 10700
❑ Excessive psyllium intake NI-4.2.4 11086 ❑ Niacin (8) 10701
❑ Excessive beta glucan intake NI-4.2.5 11081 ❑ Folate (9) 10702
❑ Excessive food additive intake NI-4.2.6 11083 ❑ B6 (10) 10703
❑ Excessive caffeine intake NI-4.2.7 11082 ❑ B12 (11) 10704
❑ Excessive alcohol intake NI-4.3 10654 ❑ Pantothenic acid (12) 10705
Nutrient (5) ❑ Biotin (13) 10706
Actual or estimated intake of specific nutrient groups or single nutrients as compared with Mineral (5.10)
desired levels ❑ Inadequate mineral intake (specify) NI-5.10.1 10709
❑ Increased nutrient needs NI-5.1 10656 ❑ Calcium (1) 10710
(specify) _______________________________ ❑ Chloride (2) 10711
❑ Inadequate protein energy intake NI-5.2 10658 ❑ Iron (3) 10712
❑ Decreased nutrient needs NI-5.3 10659 ❑ Magnesium (4) 10713
(specify) _______________________________ ❑ Potassium (5) 10714
❑ Imbalance of nutrients NI-5.4 10660 ❑ Phosphorus (6) 10715
Fat and Cholesterol (5.5) ❑ Sodium (7) 10716
❑ Inadequate fat intake NI-5.5.1 10662 ❑ Zinc (8) 10717
❑ Excessive fat intake NI-5.5.2 10663 ❑ Sulfate (9) 10718
❑ Fluoride (10) 10719
1
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021.
Nutrition Diagnostic Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
3
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Updated October 2021.
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Predicted Inadequate Nutrient Intake (Specify)
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to increase nutrient requirements
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to decrease ability to consume
sufficient nutrients
Physiological condition associated with increased need for a nutrient due to altered metabolism
Cultural or religious practices that will affect nutrient intake
Anticipated isolated living/housing situation without routine access to a variety of nutritious foods
Danger for environmental emergency or catastrophe/disaster
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Population-based biochemical parameters indicating inadequate nutrient intake
Medical Tests and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-11-1 1/3
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Predicted Inadequate Nutrient Intake (Specify)
Procedures
Anthropometric Population-based anthropometric data indicating inadequate nutrient intake
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Population-based data on acute and chronic disease prevalence indicating
Physical Findings inadequate nutrient intake
Estimated nutrient(s) intake from all sources less than projected needs
History of marginal or inadequate nutrient(s) intake
Projected change in ability to shop, prepare, and/or consume sufficient nutrient(s)
Food/Nutrition- Medications that decrease appetite and/or affect ability to consume sufficient
Related History nutrient(s)
No prior knowledge of need for food- and nutrition-related recommendations
Religious or cultural practices that will affect nutrient intake
Low supplies in home in preparation for environmental emergency or
catastrophe/disaster
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in
the US. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:74-81.
2. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the ASPEN Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines
for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of
Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). J
Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:296-300.
3. McElroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion
programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;5:351-377.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-11-1 2/3
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Predicted Inadequate Nutrient Intake (Specify)
4. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc.
2008; 108:1716-1731.
5. Position of the American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports
Medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:509-527.
6. Position of the American Dietetic Association and American Society for Nutrition: Obesity, reproduction,
and pregnancy outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:918-927.
7. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient Supplementation. J Am Diet Assoc.
2009;109:2073-2085.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-11-1 3/3
12/13/21, 11:51 AM Predicted Excessive Nutrient Intake (Specify)
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to decrease nutrient requirements
Anticipated physiological condition associated with reduced need for or altered metabolism of nutrients
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to alter metabolism of nutrients
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and Population-based biochemical parameters indicating excessive nutrient intake
Procedures
Anthropometric Population-based anthropometric data indicating excessive nutrient intake
Measurements
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-11-2 1/2
12/13/21, 11:51 AM Predicted Excessive Nutrient Intake (Specify)
Nutrition Focused Population-based data on acute and chronic disease prevalence indicating
Physical Findings excessive nutrient
Food/Nutrition- Estimated nutrient(s) intake from all sources more than projected needs
Related History History of excessive nutrient(s) intake
No prior knowledge of need for food- and nutrition-related recommendations
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Position of the American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports
Medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:509-527.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient supplementation. J Am Diet Assoc.
2009;109:2073-2085.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-11-2 2/2
12/13/21, 10:42 AM Increased Energy Expenditure
Note: RMR is the sum of metabolic processes of active cell mass related to the maintenance of normal
body functions and regulatory balance during rest.
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs due to anabolism, growth, maintenance of body
temperature
Voluntary or involuntary physical activity/movement
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric Unintentional weight loss of ≥ 10% in 6 months, ≥ 5% in 1 month (adults and
Measurements pediatrics), and > 2% in 1 week (pediatrics)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-1 1/2
12/13/21, 10:42 AM Increased Energy Expenditure
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-1 2/2
12/13/21, 10:45 AM Inadequate Energy Intake
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when the goal is weight loss, during end-of-life care,
upon initiation of EN/PN, or acute stressed state (eg, surgery, organ failure).
Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine. Dietary
Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;
2000.)
Pathological or physiological causes that result in increased energy requirements, eg, increased nutrient
needs due to prolonged catabolic illness
Decreased ability to consume sufficient energy
Lack of or limited access to food or artificial nutrition, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to
elderly and/or children
Cultural practices that affect ability to access food
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning energy intake
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric Failure to gain or maintain appropriate weight
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Poor dentition
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Estimated energy intake from diet less than needs based on estimated or measured
resting metabolic rate
Restriction or omission of energy-dense foods from diet
Food avoidance and/or lack of interest in food
Food/Nutrition-
Limited ability to independently consume foods/fluids (diminished joint mobility
Related History
of wrist, hand, or digits)
Estimated parenteral or enteral nutrition intake insufficient to meet needs based on
estimated or measured resting metabolic rate
Excessive consumption of alcohol or other drugs that reduce hunger
Medications that affect appetite
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-2 2/3
12/13/21, 10:45 AM Inadequate Energy Intake
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.19 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-2 3/3
12/13/21, 10:45 AM Excessive Energy Intake
Note: May not be appropriate nutrition diagnosis when weight gain is desired.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-3 1/3
12/13/21, 10:46 AM Excessive Energy Intake
Category
Biochemical Data, Abnormal liver function tests after prolonged exposure (3 to 6 weeks) to parenteral
Medical Tests, and nutrition
Procedures ↑ Respiratory quotient >1.0
Body fat percentage > 25% for men and > 32% for women
Anthropometric BMI > 25 (adults); BMI > 95th percentile (pediatrics)
Measurements Weight gain
Client History***
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-3 2/3
12/13/21, 10:46 AM Excessive Energy Intake
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-3 3/3
12/13/21, 10:46 AM Predicted Inadequate Energy Intake
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis during weight loss. Use Inadequate Energy Intake
(NI-1.2) when current energy intake is less than energy expenditure.
Scheduled or planned procedure or medical therapy that is predicted to increase energy requirements
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to decrease ability to consume
sufficient energy
Anticipated change in physical demands of work or leisure activities (eg, job change, training for
competitive sports)
Stressful life event or living situation (eg, death in family, divorce, loss of home) that, in the past, resulted
in inadequate energy intake
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-4 1/3
12/13/21, 10:46 AM Predicted Inadequate Energy Intake
Estimated energy intake from all sources less than projected needs
History of marginal or inadequate energy intake
Food/Nutrition- Projected change in ability to shop, prepare, and/or consume sufficient energy
Related History Medications that are anticipated to decrease appetite or affect ability to consume
sufficient energy
No prior knowledge of need for food- and nutrition-related recommendations
Projected increase in level of physical activity
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Larson N, Story M. A review of environmental influences on food choices. Ann Behav Med.
2009;38:S56-S73.
2. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in
the US. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:74-81.
3. McElroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion
programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;5:351-377.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-4 2/3
12/13/21, 10:46 AM Predicted Inadequate Energy Intake
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-4 3/3
12/13/21, 10:47 AM Predicted Excessive Energy Intake
Note: May not be appropriate nutrition diagnosis when weight gain is desired. Use Excessive Energy
Intake (NI-1.3) when current energy intake is more than energy expenditure.
Anticipated change in physical demands with periods of immobility or reduced physical activity
Family or social history or culture of overeating
Genetic predisposition to overweight/obesity
Physiological condition associated with altered metabolism
Scheduled or planned medical therapy or medication that is predicted to reduce metabolic
rate/metabolism
Stressful life event or living situation (eg, death in family, divorce, loss of home) that, in the past, resulted
in excessive energy intake
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-5 1/3
12/13/21, 10:47 AM Predicted Excessive Energy Intake
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric Population-based anthropometric data indicating excessive energy intake
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Population-based data on acute and chronic disease prevalence indicating
Physical Findings excessive energy intake
Estimated energy intake from all sources more than projected needs at new lower
metabolic level
Estimated energy intake from all sources more than projected needs at new lower
physical activity level
Food/Nutrition- History of excessive energy intake at previous metabolic level
Related History History of excessive energy intake at previous physical activity level
Recent or planned change in mobility and/or ability to engage in physical activity
Projected change in ability to shop and/or prepare food
Medications that increase appetite
Recent or planned change in physical activity
No prior knowledge of need for food- and nutrition-related recommendations
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Larson N, Story M. A review of environmental influences on food choices. Ann Behav Med.
2009;38:S56-S73.
2. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in
the US. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:74-81.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-5 2/3
12/13/21, 10:47 AM Predicted Excessive Energy Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-1-5 3/3
12/13/21, 10:51 AM Inadequate Oral Intake
Note: This nutrition diagnosis does not include intake via oroenteric tube.
May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when the goal is weight loss, during end-of-life care, upon
initiation of feeding, or during combined oral/EN/PN therapy.
Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine. Dietary
Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;
2000.)
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs, eg, due to prolonged catabolic illness
Decreased ability to consume sufficient energy, eg, increased nutrient needs due to prolonged catabolic
illness
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Limited food acceptance due to physiological or behavioral issues, aversion, or unsupported
beliefs/attitudes
Cultural practices that affect ability to access food
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate oral food/beverage intake
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-1 1/3
12/13/21, 10:51 AM Inadequate Oral Intake
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric Weight loss, insufficient growth velocity
Measurements
Dry skin, mucous membranes, poor skin turgor
Nutrition Focused Anorexia, nausea, or vomiting
Physical Findings Change in appetite or taste
Clinical evidence of vitamin/mineral deficiency
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
***Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-1 2/3
12/13/21, 10:51 AM Inadequate Oral Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.19 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-1 3/3
12/13/21, 10:51 AM Excessive Oral Intake
Note: This nutrition diagnosis does not include intake via oroenteric tube.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric Weight gain not attributed to fluid retention or normal growth
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Chabas D, Foulon C, Gonzalez J, Nasr M, Lyon-Caen O, Willer JC, Derenne JP, Arnulf I. Eating disorder
and metabolism in narcoleptic patients. Sleep. 2007;30:1267-73.
2. Fortuyn HA, Swinkels S, Buitelaar J, Renier WO, Furer JW, Rijnders CA, Hodiamont PP, Overeem S.
High prevalence of eating disorders in narcolepsy with cataplexy: a case-control study. Sleep.
2008;31:335-41.
3. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Weight management. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:330-346.
4. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Total diet approach to healthy eating. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113:307-317.
5. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The role of nutrition in health promotion and chronic
disease prevention. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:972-979.
6. Siega-Riz AM, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Von Holle A, Hamer R, Torgersen L, Knopf-Berg C, Reichborn-
Kjennerud T, Bulik CM. Nutrient and food group intakes of women with and without bulimia nervosa and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-2 2/3
12/13/21, 10:51 AM Excessive Oral Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.15 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-2 3/3
12/13/21, 10:55 AM Inadequate Enteral Nutrition Infusion
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when recommendation is for weight loss, during
end-of-life care, upon initiation of feeding, or during acute stressed states (eg, surgery, organ failure).
Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine. Dietary
Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;
2000.)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↓ Metabolic cart/indirect calorimetry measurement, eg, respiratory quotient < 0.7
Vitamin/mineral abnormalities:
↓ Calcium < 9.2 mg/dL (2.3 mmol/L)
Biochemical Data, Vitamin K—abnormal international normalized ratio (INR)
Medical Tests, and ↓ Copper < 70 µg/dL (11 µmol/L)
Procedures ↓ Zinc < 78 µg/dL (12 µmol/L)
↓ Iron < 50 µg/dL (8.9 nmol/L); iron-binding capacity < 250 µg/dL (44.8
µmol/L)
Clinical evidence of vitamin/mineral deficiency (eg, hair loss, bleeding gums, pale
nail beds, neurologic changes)
Nutrition Focused Evidence of dehydration, eg, dry mucous membranes, poor skin turgor
Physical Findings Loss of skin integrity, delayed wound healing, or pressure ulcers
Loss of muscle mass and/or subcutaneous fat
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-3 2/3
12/13/21, 10:55 AM Inadequate Enteral Nutrition Infusion
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McClave SA, Spain DA, Skolnick JL, Lowen CC, Kieber MJ, Wickerham PS, Vogt JR, Looney SW.
Achievement of steady state optimizes results when performing indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 2003;27:16-20.
2. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
3. McClave SA, Snider HL. Clinical use of gastric residual volumes as a monitor for patients on enteral tube
feeding. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S43-S48; discussion S49-S50.
4. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP, Metheny NA, Moore
FA, Scolapio JS, Spain DA, Zaloga GP. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill
Patient: consensus statement. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S80-S85.
5. McClave SA, McClain CJ, Snider HL. Should indirect calorimetry be used as part of nutritional
assessment? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:14-19.
6. McClave SA, Sexton LK, Spain DA, Adams JL, Owens NA, Sullins MB, Blandford BS, Snider HL.
Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impeding adequate delivery. Crit Care Med.
1999;27:1252-1256.
7. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, Nicholson JF, Jimmerson SC, McConnell JW, Jung LY. Are patients
fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:375-381.
8. Spain DA, McClave SA, Sexton LK, Adams JL, Blanford BS, Sullins ME, Owens NA, Snider HL.
Infusion protocol improves delivery of enteral tube feeding in the critical care unit. J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1999;23:288-292.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-3 3/3
12/13/21, 10:55 AM Excessive Enteral Nutrition Infusion
Physiological causes, eg, decreased needs related to low activity levels with critical illness or organ
failure
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate amount of enteral nutrition
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ BUN:creatinine ratio (protein)
Medical Tests, and Hyperglycemia (carbohydrate)
Procedures Hypercapnia
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-4 1/2
12/13/21, 10:55 AM Excessive Enteral Nutrition Infusion
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Client History***
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
3. Aarsland A, Chinkes D, Wolfe RR. Hepatic and whole-body fat synthesis in humans during carbohydrate
overfeeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1774-1782.
4. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, Nicholson JF, Jimmerson SC, McConnell JW, Jung LY. Are patients
fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:375-381.
5. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-4 2/2
12/13/21, 10:59 AM Enteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
Physiological causes, eg, improvement in patient/client status, allowing return to total or partial oral diet;
changes in the course of disease resulting in changes in feeding and/or nutrient requirements
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning EN product
End-of-life care if patient/client or family does not desire nutrition support
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Abnormal levels of markers specific for various nutrients, eg, hyperphosphatemia
Medical Tests, and in patient/client receiving feedings with a high phosphorus content, hypokalemia
Procedures in patient/client receiving feedings with low potassium content
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-5 1/3
12/13/21, 10:59 AM Enteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
Estimated intake from enteral nutrients that is consistently more or less than
recommended intake for carbohydrate, proteins or amino acids, fat or fatty acids,
and/or micronutrients–
Food/Nutrition-
Formula composition that is inconsistent with ability to digest and absorb nutrients
Related History
Formula composition or concentration that is inconsistent with evidence-based
practice
Verbalizations or written responses that are inaccurate or incomplete for enteral
nutrition formula prescribed
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, Nicholson JF, Jimmerson SC, McConnell JW, Jung LY. Are patients
fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:375-381.
2. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
3. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the ASPEN Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines
for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society
of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition (ASPEN). J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:296-300.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate,
Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
6. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-5 2/3
12/13/21, 10:59 AM Enteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
7. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
8. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
9. Bankhead, R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller
C, Robbins S, Wessel J, and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Enteral nutrition practice
recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33122-167.
10. Russell M, Stieber M, Brantley S, Freeman AM, Lefton J, Malone AM, Roberts S, Skates J, Young LS,
A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and ADA Quality Management Committee. American Society for
Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and American Dietetic Association: Standards of practice and standards
of professional performance for registered dietitians (generalist, specialty, and advanced) in nutrition
support. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;1815-1822.
11. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Ethical and legal issues in feeding and hydration. J
Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:828-833.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.21 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-5 3/3
12/13/21, 11:00 AM Enteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
Physiological causes, eg, improvement in patient/client status, allowing return to total or partial oral diet;
changes in the course of disease resulting in changes in feeding
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning EN product provision
End-of-life care if patient/client or family does not desire nutrition support
Physiological causes, eg, improvement in patient/client status, allowing return to total or partial oral diet;
changes in the course of disease resulting in changes in feeding and/or nutrient requirements
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning EN product
End-of-life care if patient/client or family does not desire nutrition support
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-6 1/3
12/13/21, 11:00 AM Enteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and ↑ or ↓ serum glucose
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, high gastric residual volume
Physical Findings Satiety
Improved/diminished GI function
Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, eg, major elective surgery,
Client History*** trauma, burns, head and neck cancer, and critically ill patients, acute lung injury,
acute respiratory distress syndrome, treatments/therapy requiring interruption of
infusion, transfer of nutrition care to a new setting or level of care, end-of-life care
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the ASPEN Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines
for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society
of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition (ASPEN). J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:296-300.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-6 2/3
12/13/21, 11:00 AM Enteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
2. Bankhead, R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller
C, Robbins S, Wessel J, and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Enteral nutrition practice
recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33122-167. Russell M, Stieber M, Brantley S, Freeman
AM, Lefton J, Malone AM, Roberts S, Skates J, Young LS, A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and ADA
Quality Management Committee. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and American
Dietetic Association: Standards of practice and standards of professional performance for registered
dietitians (generalist, specialty, and advanced) in nutrition support. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;1815-1822.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-6 3/3
12/13/21, 11:00 AM Inadequate Parenteral Nutrition Infusion
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when recommendation is for weight loss, during
end-of-life care, upon initiation of feeding, or during acute stressed states (eg, surgery, organ failure).
Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine. Dietary
Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;
2000.)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Assessment
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↓ Metabolic cart/indirect calorimetry measurement, eg, respiratory quotient
< 0.7
Vitamin/mineral abnormalities:
↓ Calcium < 9.2 mg/dL (2.3 mmol/L)
Biochemical Data, Medical Vitamin K—abnormal international normalized ratio (INR)
Tests, and Procedures ↓ Copper < 70 µg/dL (11 µmol/L)
↓ Zinc < 78 µg/dL (12 µmol/L)
↓ Iron < 50 µg/dL(nmol/L); iron-binding capacity < 250 µg/dL (44.8
µmol/L)
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-7 2/3
12/13/21, 11:00 AM Inadequate Parenteral Nutrition Infusion
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McClave SA, Spain DA, Skolnick JL, Lowen CC, Kieber MJ, Wickerham PS, Vogt JR, Looney SW.
Achievement of steady state optimizes results when performing indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 2003;27:16-20.
2. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
3. McClave SA, Snider HL. Clinical use of gastric residual volumes as a monitor for patients on enteral tube
feeding. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S43-S48; discussion S49-S50.
4. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP, Metheny NA, Moore
FA, Scolapio JS, Spain DA, Zaloga GP. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill
Patient: consensus statement. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(Suppl):S80-S85.
5. McClave SA, McClain CJ, Snider HL. Should indirect calorimetry be used as part of nutritional
assessment? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:14-19.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-7 3/3
12/13/21, 11:01 AM Excessive Parenteral Nutrition Infusion
Physiological causes, eg, decreased needs related to low activity levels with critical illness or organ
failure
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate amount of PN
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↑ BUN:creatinine ratio (protein)
Biochemical Data, Hyperglycemia (carbohydrate)
Medical Tests, and Hypercapnia
Procedures ↑ liver enzymes
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-8 1/2
12/13/21, 11:01 AM Excessive Parenteral Nutrition Infusion
Client History
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
3. Aarsland A, Chinkes D, Wolfe RR. Hepatic and whole-body fat synthesis in humans during carbohydrate
overfeeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1774-1782.
4. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, Nicholson JF, Jimmerson SC, McConnell JW, Jung LY. Are patients
fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:375-381.
5. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
6. Wolfe RR, O’Donnell TF Jr, Stone MD, Richmand DA, Burke JF. Investigation of factors determining the
optimal glucose infusion rate in total parenteral nutrition. Metabolism. 1980;29:892-900.
7. Jensen GL, Mascioli EA, Seidner DL, Istfan NW, Domnitch AM, Selleck K, Babayan VK, Blackburn
GL, Bistrian BR. Parenteral infusion of long- and medium-chain triglycerides and reticulothelial system
function in man. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14:467-471.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.42 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-8 2/2
12/13/21, 11:04 AM Parenteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
Physiological causes, eg, improvement in patient/client status, allowing return to total or partial oral diet
or enteral nutrition; changes in the course of disease resulting in changes in feeding and/or nutrient
requirements
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning PN composition
End-of-life care if patient/client or family does not desire nutrition support
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↑ liver function tests in patient/client on long-term (more than 3 to 6 weeks)
Biochemical Data, nutrition support
Medical Tests, and Abnormal levels of markers specific for various nutrients, eg, hyperphosphatemia
Procedures in patient/client receiving feedings with a high phosphorus content, hypokalemia
in patient/client receiving feedings with low potassium content
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-9 1/3
12/13/21, 11:04 AM Parenteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
Estimated intake from parenteral nutrients that is consistently more or less than
recommended intake for carbohydrate, protein or amino acids, fat or fatty acids,
vitamins, and/or minerals—
Food/Nutrition- Estimated intake of other nutrients that is consistently more or less
Related History than recommended
Formula composition or type that is inconsistent with evidence-based practice
Verbalizations or written responses that are inaccurate or incomplete regarding PN
solution
History of parenteral nutrition intolerance
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Aarsland A, Chinkes D, Wolfe RR. Hepatic and whole-body fat synthesis in humans during carbohydrate
overfeeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1774-1782.
2. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, Nicholson JF, Jimmerson SC, McConnell JW, Jung LY. Are patients
fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998;22:375-381.
3. McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ, McConnell JW, Jung LY, Goldsmith LJ. Clinical use of the
respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:21-26.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-9 2/3
12/13/21, 11:04 AM Parenteral Nutrition Composition Inconsistent with Needs
4. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the ASPEN Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines
for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society
of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
(ASPEN). J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:296-300.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
6. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
7. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
8. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
9. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
10. Wolfe RR, O’Donnell TF, Jr., Stone MD, Richmand DA, Burke JF. Investigation of factors determining
the optimal glucose infusion rate in total parenteral nutrition. Metabolism. 1980;29:892-900.
11. Bankhead, R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller
C, Robbins S, Wessel J, and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Enteral nutrition practice
recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33122-167.
12. Russell M, Stieber M, Brantley S, Freeman AM, Lefton J, Malone AM, Roberts S, Skates J, Young LS,
A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and ADA Quality Management Committee. American Society for
Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and American Dietetic Association: Standards of practice and standards
of professional performance for registered dietitians (generalist, specialty, and advanced) in nutrition
support. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;1815-1822.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-9 3/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Parenteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
Physiological causes, eg, improvement in patient/client status, allowing return to total or partial oral diet
or enteral nutrition; changes in the course of disease resulting in changes in feeding provision
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning PN provision
End-of-life care if patient/client or family does not desire nutrition support
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ liver function tests in patient/client on long-term (more than 3 to 6 weeks)
Medical Tests, and nutrition support
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Infusion site compromise
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-10 1/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Parenteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the ASPEN Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines
for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society
of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN).
J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:296-300.
2. Wolfe RR, O’Donnell TF, Jr., Stone MD, Richmand DA, Burke JF. Investigation of factors determining
the optimal glucose infusion rate in total parenteral nutrition. Metabolism. 1980;29:892-900.
3. Bankhead, R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J, Lyman B, Metheny NA, Mueller
C, Robbins S, Wessel J, and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Enteral nutrition practice
recommendations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33122-167.
4. Russell M, Stieber M, Brantley S, Freeman AM, Lefton J, Malone AM, Roberts S, Skates J, Young LS,
A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and ADA Quality Management Committee. American Society for
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-10 2/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Parenteral Nutrition Administration Inconsistent with Needs
Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and American Dietetic Association: Standards of practice and standards
of professional performance for registered dietitians (generalist, specialty, and advanced) in nutrition
support. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;1815-1822.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-10 3/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Limited Food Acceptance
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis for individuals with anorexia nervosa, bulimia
nervosa, binge eating disorder, or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Please consider
using Disordered Eating Pattern (NB-1.5).
Physiological causes, eg, pain, discomfort, or functional issues in the GI tract, developmental
delay, neurological disorders
Aversion to food/beverages in mouth, throat, or hands
Self-limitation of foods/food groups due to food preference
Behavioral issues including caregiver issues and eating behavior that serves a purpose other than
nourishment
Unsupported beliefs and attitudes
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-11 1/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Limited Food Acceptance
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Burklow KA, Phelps AN, Schultz JR, McConnell K, Rudolph C. Classifying complex pediatric feeding
disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27:143-147.
2. Chatoor I. Feeding disorders in infants and toddlers: diagnosis and treatment. Child Adolesc Psychiatr
Clin N Am. 2002;11:163-183.
3. Dunitz-Scheer M, Levine A, Roth Y, Kratky E, Beckenbach H, Braegger C, Hauer A, Wilken M,
Wittenberg J, Trabi T, Scheer PJ. Prevention and treatment of tube dependency in infancy and early
childhood. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition. 2009;1:72-82.
4. Falciglia GA, Couch SC, Siem Gribble L, Pabst SM, Frank R. Food neophobia in childhood affects
dietary variety. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1474-1481.
5. Galloway AT, Lee Y, Birch LL. Predictors and consequences of food neophobia and pickiness in young
girls. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:692-698.
6. Miller CK. Updates on pediatric feeding and swallowing problems. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2009;17:194-199.
7. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition services for individuals with intellectual
and developmental disabilities and special health care needs. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:593-608.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-11 2/3
12/13/21, 11:05 AM Limited Food Acceptance
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-2-11 3/3
12/13/21, 11:06 AM Inadequate Fluid Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Dietary Reference
Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National
Academies Press; 2000.)
Physiological causes increasing fluid needs due to climate/temperature change, increased exercise
or conditions leading to increased fluid losses, fever causing increased insensible losses, decreased
thirst sensation, or use of drugs that reduce thirst
Lack of or limited access to fluid, eg, economic constraints, unable to access fluid independently such as
elderly or children
Cultural practices that affect the ability to access fluid
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate fluid intake
Psychological causes, eg, depression or disordered eating
Impaired cognitive ability, including learning disabilities, neurological or sensory impairment, and/or
dementia
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-3-1 1/3
12/13/21, 11:06 AM Inadequate Fluid Intake
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Plasma or serum osmolality greater than 290 mOsm/kg
Biochemical Data, Abnormal BUN, Na
Medical Tests, and ↓ Urine volume
Procedures ↑ Urine specific gravity
Hyperglycemia in diabetic client
Food/Nutrition- Estimated intake of fluid less than requirements (eg, per body surface area for
Related History pediatrics)
Use of drugs that reduce thirst
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
2. Grandjean AC, Campbell SM. Hydration: Fluids for Life. Monograph Series. Washington DC:
International Life Sciences Institute North America; 2004.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-3-1 2/3
12/13/21, 11:06 AM Inadequate Fluid Intake
3. Grandjean AC, Reimers KJ, Buyckx ME. Hydration: issues for the 21st century. Nutr Rev. 2003;61:261-
271.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.47 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-3-1 3/3
12/13/21, 11:06 AM Excessive Fluid Intake
Physiological causes, eg, kidney, liver, cardiac, endocrine, neurological, and/or pulmonary dysfunction;
diminished water and sodium losses due to changes in exercise or climate, syndrome of inappropriate
antidiuretic hormone (SIADH)
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate fluid intake
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↓ Plasma osmolality (270-280 mOsm/kg), only if positive fluid balance is in
Biochemical Data, excess of positive sodium balance
Medical Tests, and ↓ Serum sodium in SIADH
Procedures ↓ Urine specific gravity
Measurements
Edema in the skin of the legs, sacral area, or diffusely; weeping of fluids from
lower legs
Ascites
Nutrition Focused Pulmonary edema as evidenced by shortness of breath; orthopnea; crackles or rales
Physical Findings Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, headache, muscle spasms, convulsions
Shortness of breath or dyspnea with exertion or at rest
Providing medications in large amounts of fluid
Use of drugs that impair fluid excretion
Food/Nutrition- Estimated intake of fluid more than requirements (eg, per body surface area for
Related History pediatrics)
Estimated salt intake in excess of recommendations
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
2. Schirer RW, ed. Renal and Electrolyte Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott Williams and Willkins;
2003.
3. Hyponatremia. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000394.htm. Accessed June 12, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-3-2 2/2
12/13/21, 11:08 AM Inadequate Bioactive Substance Intake (specify)
Note: Bioactive substances are not part of the Dietary Reference Intakes, and therefore there are no
established minimum requirements or Tolerable Upper Intake Levels. However, nutrition and dietetics
practitioners can assess whether estimated intakes are adequate or excessive using the client goal or
nutrition prescription for comparison.
Working definition of bioactive substances—physiologically active components of foods that may have an
effect on health. There is no scientific consensus about a definition for bioactive substances/components.
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning recommended bioactive substance intake
Lack of or limited access to food that contains a bioactive substance
Alteration in gastrointestinal tract structure and/or function
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-1 1/2
12/13/21, 11:08 AM Inadequate Bioactive Substance Intake (specify)
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Estimated intake of plant foods containing the following lower than recommended:
Soluble fiber, eg, psyllium (↓ total and LDL cholesterol)
Soy protein (↓ total and LDL cholesterol)
Food/Nutrition- Beta glucan, eg, whole oat products (↓ total and LDL cholesterol)
Related History Plant sterol and stanol esters, eg, fortified margarines (↓ total and LDL
cholesterol)
Other substances (for which scientific evidence exists and a recommended
intake level has been established)
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge about bioactive substances
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Crowe KM, Francis C. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Functional foods. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113(6):1096-1103.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.20 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-1 2/2
12/13/21, 11:08 AM Excessive Bioactive Substance Intake (specify)
Note: Bioactive substances are not part of the Dietary Reference Intakes, and therefore there are no
established minimum requirements or Tolerable Upper Intake Levels. However, nutrition and dietetics
practitioners can assess whether estimated intakes are adequate or excessive using the client goal or
nutrition prescription for comparison.
Working definition of bioactive substances—physiologically active components of foods that may have an
effect on health. There is no scientific consensus about a definition for bioactive substances/components.
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning recommended bioactive substance intake
including food additives
Contamination, misname, mislabel or lack of labeling, misuse, recent brand change, recent dose increase,
recent formulation change of substance consumed
Frequent intake of foods containing bioactive substances
Alteration in gastrointestinal tract structure and/or function
Lack of or limited access to appropriate foods, eg, inadequate markets with labeled food
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Lab values indicating excessive intake of the specific substance, such as rapid ↓ in
Biochemical Data, cholesterol from intake of stanol or sterol esters and a statin drug and related
Medical Tests, and dietary changes or medications
Procedures ↑ Hepatic enzyme reflecting hepatocellular damage
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:09 AM Excessive Bioactive Substance Intake (specify)
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2004.
2. Crowe KM, Frances C. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Functional foods. J Acad
Nutr Diet. 2013;113(8):1096-1103.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:09 AM Excessive Alcohol Intake
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT),
Medical Tests and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, mean corpuscular volume, blood alcohol levels
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Food/Nutrition- Reports or observations of:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-3 1/2
12/13/21, 11:09 AM Excessive Alcohol Intake
*1 drink = 5 oz (150 mL) wine, 12 oz (350 mL) beer, 1.5 oz (45 mL) distilled
alcohol
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
References
1. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The role of nutrition in health promotion and chronic
disease prevention. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:972-979.
2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health. Accessed
June 12, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-4-3 2/2
12/13/21, 11:15 AM Increased Nutrient Needs (Specify)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (Potential Indicators of This Nutrition
Assessment
Diagnosis)
Category
↓ total cholesterol < 160 mg/dL, albumin, prealbumin, C-reactive protein,
Biochemical Data, indicating increased stress and increased metabolic needs
Medical Tests, and Electrolyte/mineral (eg, potassium, magnesium, phosphorus) abnormalities
Procedures Urinary or fecal losses of specific or related nutrient (eg, fecal fat, d-xylose test)
Vitamin and/or mineral deficiency
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-1 1/2
12/13/21, 11:15 AM Increased Nutrient Needs (Specify)
Anthropometric Growth failure, based on reference growth standards, eg National Center for
Measurements Health Statistics (NCHS) and fetal growth failure
Unintentional weight loss of ≥ 5% in 1 month or ≥ 10% in 6 months
Underweight (BMI < 18.5)
Low percent body fat and muscle mass
Clinical evidence of vitamin/mineral deficiency (eg, hair loss, bleeding gums, pale
Nutrition Focused nail beds)
Physical Findings Loss of skin integrity, delayed wound healing, or pressure ulcers
Loss of muscle mass, subcutaneous fat
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Beyer P. Gastrointestinal disorders: roles of nutrition and the dietetics practitioner. J Am Diet Assoc.
1998;98:272-277.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition intervention and human immunodeficiency virus
infection. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1105-1119.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.17 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-1 2/2
12/13/21, 11:15 AM Inadequate Protein Energy Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:15 AM Inadequate Protein Energy Intake
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data, Normal albumin (in the setting of normal liver function despite decreased protein-
Medical Tests, and energy intake)
Procedures
Inadequate maternal weight gain (mild but not severe)
Anthropometric Weight loss of 7% in 3 months, >5% in 1 month, or 1% to 2% in 1 week in adults;
Measurements any weight loss or failure to gain weight in children
Growth failure in children
Estimated energy intake from diet less than estimated or measured RMR or
recommended levels
Restriction or omission of food groups such as dairy or meat group foods
Food/Nutrition-
(protein); bread or milk group foods (energy)
Related History
Recent food avoidance and/or lack of interest in food
Lack of ability to prepare meals
Excessive consumption of alcohol or other drugs that reduce hunger
Hunger in the face of inadequate access to food supply
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:15 AM Inadequate Protein Energy Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:16 AM Decreased Nutrient Needs (Specify)
Renal dysfunction
Liver dysfunction
Altered cholesterol metabolism/regulation
Heart failure
Food intolerances, eg, irritable bowel syndrome
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ Total cholesterol > 200 mg/dL (5.2 mmol/L), ↑ LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dL
Medical Tests, and (2.59 mmol/L), ↓ HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1.036 mmol/L), ↑ triglycerides >
Procedures 150 mg/dL (1.695 mmol/L)
↑ Phosphorus > 5.5 mg/dL (1.78 mmol/L)
↓ Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-3 1/3
12/13/21, 11:16 AM Decreased Nutrient Needs (Specify)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Aparicio M, Chauveau P, Combe C. Low protein diets and outcomes of renal patients. J Nephrol.
2001;14:433-439.
2. Beto JA, Bansal VK. Medical nutrition therapy in chronic kidney failure: integrating clinical practice
guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:404-409.
3. Cupisti A, Morelli E, D’Alessandro C, Lupetti S, Barsotti G. Phosphate control in chronic uremia: don’t
forget diet. J Nephrol. 2003;16:29-33.
4. Durose CL, Holdsworth M, Watson V, Przygrodzka F. Knowledge of dietary restrictions and the medical
consequences of noncompliance by patients on hemodialysis are not predictive of dietary compliance. J
Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:35-41.
5. Floch MH, Narayan R. Diet in the irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;35:S45-S52.
6. Kato J, Kobune M, Nakamura T, Kurojwa G, Takada K, Takimoto R, Sato Y, Fujikawa K, Takahashi M,
Takayama T, Ikeda T, Niitsu Y. Normalization of elevated hepatic 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine levels in
chronic hepatitis C patients by phlebotomy and low iron diet. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8697-8702.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-3 2/3
12/13/21, 11:16 AM Decreased Nutrient Needs (Specify)
7. Lee SH, Molassiotis A. Dietary and fluid compliance in Chinese hemodialysis patients. Int J Nurs Stud.
2002;39:695-704.
8. Poduval RD, Wolgemuth C, Ferrell J, Hammes MS. Hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients: is there a
role for focused counseling? J Ren Nutr. 2003;13:219-223.
9. Tandon N, Thakur V, Guptan RK, Sarin SK. Beneficial influence of an indigenous low-iron diet on serum
indicators of iron status in patients with chronic liver disease. Br J Nutr. 2000;83:235-239.
10. Zrinyi M, Juhasz M, Balla J, Katona E, Ben T, Kakuk G, Pall D. Dietary self-efficacy: determinant of
compliance behaviours and biochemical outcomes in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
2003;19:1869-1873.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-3 3/3
12/13/21, 11:16 AM Imbalance of Nutrients
IMBALANCE OF NUTRIENTS
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Severe hypophosphatemia (in the presence of increased carbohydrate)
Medical Tests, and Severe hypokalemia (in the presence of increased protein)
Procedures Severe hypomagnesemia (in the presence of increased carbohydrate)
Anthropometric
Measurements
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-4 1/2
12/13/21, 11:16 AM Imbalance of Nutrients
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-4 2/2
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Inadequate Fat Intake
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when the goal is weight loss or during end-of-life
care.
Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical, biochemical,
anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to provide a valid
assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Dietary Reference Intakes:
Applications in Dietary Assessment. Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press;
2000).
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and ↑ Triene:tetraene ratio > 0.2
Procedures
Anthropometric Impaired growth
Measurements Weight loss if insufficient calories/kcal/kJ consumed
Nutrition Focused Scaly skin and dermatitis consistent with essential fatty acid deficiency
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Estimated intake of essential fatty acids less than 10% of energy (primarily
Food/Nutrition-
associated with parenteral nutrition)
Related History
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge
Cultural or religious practices that affect intake
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.20 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-1 2/2
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Excessive Fat Intake
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate amount of dietary fat
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Limited access to healthful food choices, eg, healthful food choices not provided as an option by
caregiver or parent, homeless
Changes in taste and appetite or preference
Limited value for behavior change, competing values
Physiological causes decreasing total fat needs or recommendations
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ Cholesterol > 200 mg/dL (5.2 mmol/L), ↑ LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dL (2.59
Medical Tests, and mmol/L), ↓ HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1.036 mmol/L), ↑ triglycerides > 150
Procedures mg/dL (1.695 mmol/L)
↑ Serum amylase and/or lipase
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Excessive Fat Intake
↑ LFTs, T. bilirubin
↑ Fecal fat > 7g/24 hours
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Evidence of xanthomas
Physical Findings Diarrhea, cramping, steatorrhea, epigastric pain
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Interventions for the prevention and treatment
of pediatric overweight and obesity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:1375-1394.
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Total diet approach to healthy eating. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113:307-317.
4. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The role of nutrition in health promotion and chronic
disease prevention. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:972-979.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Excessive Fat Intake
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning type of fat (eg, fats added to food,
formula/breastmilk)
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Limited access to healthful food choices, eg, healthful food choices not provided as an option by
caregiver or parent, homeless
Changes in taste and appetite or preference
Limited value for behavior change, competing values
Physiological causes altering fatty acid needs or recommendations
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ Cholesterol > 200 mg/dL (5.2 mmol/L), ↑ LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dL (2.59
Medical Tests, and mmol/L), ↓ HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1.036 mmol/L) men, ↓ HDL cholesterol
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-3 1/3
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Procedures < 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) women, ↑ triglycerides > 150 mg/dL (1.695 mmol/L)
↑ Serum amylase and/or lipase
↑ LFTs, T. bilirubin, C-reactive protein
Altered acylcarnitine, carnitine, and other measures of fatty acid metabolism
Elevated triene:tetraene ratio (>0.2)
Altered fatty acid panel mitochondrial C8-C18, serum or plasma (µmol/L)
Altered fatty acid panel mitochondrial C2-C22, serum or plasma (µmol/L)
Altered fatty acid panel mitochondrial C22-C26, serum or plasma (µmol/L)
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Evidence of dermatitis
Physical Findings Diarrhea, cramping, steatorrhea, epigastric pain
Frequent food preparation with added fat that is not of desired type for condition
Frequent consumption of fats that are undesirable for condition (eg, saturated
Food/Nutrition- fat, trans fat, cholesterol, n-6 fatty acids, fatty acid chain length)
Related History Estimated intake of monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, n-3 fatty acids, or
DHA/ARA, fatty acid chain length less than recommended or in suboptimal ratio
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge
Verbalizes unsupported beliefs and attitudes
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Abdenur JE. MCAD deficiency. Acylcarnitines (AC) by tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) are useful
to monitor dietary treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1999;466:353-363.
2. de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin J-L, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk
factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: Final report of the Lyon
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-3 2/3
12/13/21, 11:20 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-5-3 3/3
12/13/21, 11:35 AM Inadequate Protein Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors
to provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of
Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2000.)
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs due to prolonged catabolic illness, malabsorption, age, or
condition
Decreased ability to consume sufficient protein
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Cultural practices that affect the ability to access food
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning amount of protein
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-1 1/2
12/13/21, 11:35 AM Inadequate Protein Intake
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Edema, failure to thrive (infants/children), poor musculature, dull skin, thin and
Physical Findings fragile hair
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-1 2/2
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Excessive Protein Intake
Liver dysfunction
Renal dysfunction
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit
Lack of, or limited access to specialized protein products
Metabolic abnormality
Food faddism
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Altered laboratory values, eg, ↑ BUN, ↓ glomerular filtration rate (altered renal
Medical Tests, and status)
Procedures
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Excessive Protein Intake
Anthropometric Growth stunting or failure based on National Center for Health Statistics growth
Measurements charts (metabolic disorders)
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Estimated total protein intake higher than recommended, eg, early renal disease,
Food/Nutrition- advanced liver disease with confusion
Related History Less than optimal supplementation
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge
Verbalizes unsupported beliefs and attitudes
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Beto JA, Bansal VK. Medical nutrition therapy in chronic kidney failure: integrating clinical practice
guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:404-409.
2. Brandle E, Sieberth HG, Hautmann RE. Effect of chronic dietary protein intake on the renal function in
healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:734-740.
3. Frassetto LA, Todd KM, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A. Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic acid
production in humans from diet, potassium and protein contents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:576-583.
4. Friedman N, ed. Absorption and Utilization of Amino Acids. Vol. I. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;
1989:229-242.
5. Hoogeveen EK, Kostense PJ, Jager A, Heine RJ, Jakobs C, Bouter LM, Donker AJ, Stehower CD. Serum
homocysteine level and protein intake are related to risk of microalbuminuria: the Hoorn study. Kidney
Int. 1998;54:203-209.
6. Rudman D, DiFulco TJ, Galambos JT, Smith RB, Salam AA, Warren WD. Maximum rate of excretion
and synthesis of urea in normal and cirrhotic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2241-2249.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Excessive Protein Intake
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Liver dysfunction
Renal dysfunction
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Misused specialized protein products
Metabolic abnormality
Food faddism
Inborn errors of metabolism
Celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, or other GI disease
Cultural or religious practices that affect the ability to regulate types of protein or amino acids consumed
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning an appropriate amount of a specific types
of proteins or amino acids
Food and nutrition adherence limitations
Insufficient access to appropriate protein sources
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-3 1/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
Category
Altered laboratory values, eg, ↑ BUN, ↓ glomerular filtration rate (altered renal
status)
Biochemical Data, ↑ specific amino acids (inborn errors of metabolism)
Medical Tests, and ↑ homocysteine or ammonia
Procedures Positive autoantibody levels (Anti-tTG antibodies, EmA IgA tissue
transglutaminase [tTG] and IgA endomysial antibodies [EMA])
Positive small bowel biopsy for celiac or other GI disease
Estimated protein intake from all sources higher or lower than recommended
Food/Nutrition- Estimated energy intake from all sources lower than recommended
Related History Less than optimal supplementation of specific types of protein
Limited knowledge of protein composition or of protein metabolism
Chronic use of medications containing proteins not recommended
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Celiac Disease Evidenced-based Nutrition Practice Guideline.
http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=3677. Accessed June 12, 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-3 2/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Proteins Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-6-3 3/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Amino Acids Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Liver dysfunction
Renal dysfunction
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Misused specialized amino acid products
Metabolic demand or abnormality
Medication with an amino acid interaction
Inborn errors of metabolism
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning an appropriate amount of specific amino acids
Limited adherence to recommendation to modify amino acid intake
Insufficient access to appropriate amino acid sources
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-7-1 1/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Amino Acids Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Estimated amino acid intake higher or lower than recommended via all routes
Food/Nutrition-
Less than optimal amino acid supplementation
Related History
Incomplete knowledge of amino acid composition or of amino acid metabolism
Estimated energy intake from all sources lower than recommended
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-7-1 2/3
12/13/21, 11:37 AM Intake of Types of Amino Acids Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
7. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L,
Cresci G, the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and the American College of Critical Care Medicine.
Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill
patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277-316.
8. Singh RH, Rohr F, Frazier D, Cunningham A, Mofidi S, Ogata B, Splett PL, Moseley K, Huntington K,
Acosta PB, Vockley J, Van Calcar SC. Recommendations for the nutrition management of phenylalanine
hydroxylase deficiency. Genet Med. 2014. 16:121-131.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-7-1 3/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Inadequate Carbohydrate Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Physiological causes, eg, increased energy needs due to increased activity level or metabolic change,
malabsorption
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Cultural practices that affect the ability to access food
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate amount of dietary carbohydrate
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-1 1/2
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Inadequate Carbohydrate Intake
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Ketone smell on breath
Physical Findings
Reports or observation of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-1 2/2
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Excessive Carbohydrate Intake
Physiological causes requiring modified carbohydrate intake, eg, diabetes mellitus, lactase deficiency,
sucrase-isomaltase deficiency, aldolase-B deficiency
Cultural practices that affect the ability to reduce carbohydrate intake
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate amount of carbohydrate intake
Limited adherence with recommendations to modify carbohydrate intake
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Hyperglycemia (↑ fasting blood glucose > 126 mg/dL)
Medical Tests, and ↑ Hemoglobin A1C > 6%
Procedures ↑ Oral glucose tolerance test (2-hour post load glucose > 200 mg/dL)
Anthropometric
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Excessive Carbohydrate Intake
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Dental caries
Physical Findings Diarrhea
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF, Ahmann A, Smith EP, Schafer RG, Hirsch IB, American Diabetes
Association Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee. Management of diabetes in hospitals. Diabetes
Care. 2004;27:553-592.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/standards-medical-care-diabetes. Accessed February 9,
2018.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Excessive Carbohydrate Intake
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Intake of Types of Carbohydrate Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Note: Intolerance to the protein component of grains (eg, gluten) should be documented using the Intake
of types of proteins inconsistent with needs (NI-5.6.3) reference sheet.
Physiological causes altering carbohydrate digestion or metabolism, eg, intolerance, inborn errors of
carbohydrate metabolism.
Note. Although research does not support restriction of individual types of carbohydrate for
glycemic control, nutrition and dietetics practitioners may determine that restriction is warranted
in unique client situations for glycemic control and/or for other reasons, such as promotion of
healthful eating.
Cultural or religious practices that affect the ability to regulate types of carbohydrate consumed
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning an appropriate amount of a specific type of
carbohydrate
Limited adherence to recommendation to modify type of carbohydrate intake
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-3 1/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Intake of Types of Carbohydrate Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia
Medical Tests, and ↓ galactose-1-phosphate in red blood cells, ↓ galactose-1-phosphate uridyl
Procedures transferase, ↓ fructose
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-3 2/3
12/13/21, 11:38 AM Intake of Types of Carbohydrate Inconsistent with Needs (Specify)
1. Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, et al. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of
adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3821-3842.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1.
Accessed December 15, 2017.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 12, 2018.
4. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Pediatric Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/. Accessed February 13, 2018.
5. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/standards-medical-care-diabetes. Accessed February 9,
2018.
6. Bosch AM, Classical galactosaemia revisited J Inher Met Dis. 2006;29:516-525.
7. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
8. Teff KL, Elliott SS, Tschöp M, Kieffer TJ, Rader D, Heiman M, Townsend RR, Keim NL, D’Alessio D,
Havel PJ. Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of
ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2963-2972.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.18 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-3 3/3
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Inconsistent Carbohydrate Intake
Physiological causes requiring careful timing and consistency in the amount of carbohydrate, eg, diabetes
mellitus, hypoglycemia, PN/EN delivery
Cultural practices that affect the ability to regulate timing of carbohydrate consumption
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate timing of carbohydrate intake
Limited adherence to recommendations to modify carbohydrate timing
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia documented on regular basis associated with
Medical Tests and inconsistent carbohydrate intake
Procedures Wide variations in blood glucose levels
Anthropometric
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-4 1/2
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Inconsistent Carbohydrate Intake
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Diabetes type 1 and 2.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5305. Accessed February 9, 2018.
2. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/standards-medical-care-diabetes. Accessed February 9,
2018.
3. Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, et al. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of
adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3821-3842.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-4 2/2
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Inadequate Fiber Intake
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-5 1/2
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Inadequate Fiber Intake
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Inadequate fecal bulk
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. DiPalma JA. Current treatment options for chronic constipation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2004;2:S34-
S42.
2. Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J
Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750-759.
3. Lembo A, Camilieri M. Chronic constipation. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:360-368.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
5. Talley NJ. Definition, epidemiology, and impact of chronic constipation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord.
2004;2:S3-S10.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-5 2/2
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Excessive Fiber Intake
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-6 1/2
12/13/21, 11:39 AM Excessive Fiber Intake
Nutrition Focused Nausea, vomiting, excessive flatulence, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, high stool
Physical Findings volume or frequency that causes discomfort to the individual
Estimated fiber intake higher than tolerated or generally recommended for current
Food/Nutrition-
medical condition
Related History
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge
Verbalizes unsupported beliefs and attitudes
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. DiPalma JA. Current treatment options for chronic constipation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2004;2:S34-
S42.
2. Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J
Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750-759.
3. Lembo A, Camilieri M. Chronic constipation. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:360-368.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids,
Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
5. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc.
2008;108:1716-1731.
6. Talley NJ. Definition, epidemiology, and impact of chronic constipation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord.
2004;2:S3-S10.
7. van den Berg H, van der Gaag M, Hendriks H. Influence of lifestyle on vitamin bioavailability. Int J
Vitam Nutr Res. 2002;72:53-55.
8. Wald A. Irritable bowel syndrome. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 1999;2:13-19.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-8-6 2/2
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Vitamin Intake (Specify)
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs, eg, due to prolonged catabolic illness, disease state,
malabsorption, or medications
Decreased ability to consume sufficient amount of a vitamin(s)
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Cultural practices that affect ability to access food
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning food and supplemental sources of vitamins
Psychological causes, eg, depression or eating disorders
Access causes including season, geography, limited access to sunlight
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-9-1 1/3
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Vitamin Intake (Specify)
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Vitamin A: ↓ serum retinol < 10 µg/dL (0.35 µmol/L)
Vitamin C: ↓ plasma concentrations < 0.2 mg/dL (11.4 µmol/L)
Vitamin D: ↓ 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L, ↓ ionized calcium < 3.9 mg/dL (0.98 mmol/L)
with ↑ parathyroid hormone, normal serum calcium, and ↓ serum phosphorus < 2.6
mg/dL (0.84 mmol/L)
Vitamin E: ↓ plasma alpha-tocopherol < 18 µmol/g (41.8 µmol/L)
Vitamin K: ↑ prothrombin time; altered INR (without anticoagulation therapy)
Biochemical Data, Thiamin: ↑ erythrocyte transketolase activity > 1.20 µg/mL/h
Medical Tests and Riboflavin: ↑ erythrocyte glutathione reductase > 1.2 IU/g hemoglobin
Procedures Niacin: ↓ N’methyl-nicotinamide excretion < 5.8 µmol/day
Vitamin B-6: ↓ plasma pryrdoxal 5’phosphate <5 ng/mL (20 nmol/L)
Vitamin B-12: ↓ serum concentration < 24.4 ng/dL (180 pmol/L); ↑ homocysteine
Folic acid: ↓ serum concentration < 0.3 µg/dL (7 nmol/L); ↓ red cell folate < 315
nmol/L
Pantothenic acid: ↓ plasma
Biotin: ↓ serum
Anthropometric
Measurements
Vitamin A: night blindness, Bitot’s spots, xerophthalmia, follicular hyperkeratosis
Vitamin C: follicular hyperkeratosis, petichiae, ecchymosis, coiled hairs, inflamed
and bleeding gums, perifolicular hemorrhages, joint effusions, arthralgia, and
impaired wound healing
Vitamin D: widening at ends of long bones
Riboflavin: sore throat, hyperemia, edema of pharyngeal and oral mucous
membranes, cheilosis, angular stomatitis, glossitis, magenta tongue, seborrheic
dermatitis, and normochromic, normocytic anemia with pure erythrocyte
cytoplasia of the bone marrow
Nutrition Focused Niacin: symmetrical, pigmented rash on areas exposed to sunlight; bright red
Physical Findings tongue
Vitamin B-6: seborrheic dermatitis, stomatitis, cheilosis, glossitis, confusion,
depression
Vitamin B-12: tingling and numbness in extremities, diminished vibratory and
position sense, motor disturbances including gait disturbances
Pantothenic acid: irritability and restlessness, fatigue, apathy, malaise, sleep
disturbances, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, numbness, muscle cramps,
hypoglycemia, sensitivity to insulin
Biotin: dermatitis, conjunctivitis, alopecia, depression, lethargy, hallucinations and
paresthesia, hypotonia, developmental delays
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2000.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate,
Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and
Fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-9-1 3/3
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Excessive Vitamin Intake (Specify)
Physiological causes decreasing nutrient needs due to prolonged immobility or chronic renal disease
Access to foods and supplements in excess of needs, eg, cultural or religious practices; less-than-optimal
food and supplements given to pregnant women, elderly, or children
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning food and supplemental sources of vitamins
Psychological causes, eg, depression or eating disorders
Accidental overdose from oral and supplemental forms, enteral or parenteral sources
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Vitamin D: ↑ 25(OH) D, ↑ ionized calcium > 5.4 mg/dL (1.35 mmol/L)
Medical Tests and with ↑ parathyroid hormone, normal or ↑ serum calcium, and ↑ serum phosphorus
Procedures > 2.6 mg/dL (0.84 mmol/L)
Vitamin K: ↓ prothrombin time or altered INR
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-9-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Excessive Vitamin Intake (Specify)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-9-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Excessive Vitamin Intake (Specify)
References
1. Allen LH, Haskell M. Estimating the potential for vitamin A toxicity in women and young children. J Nutr.
2002;132:S2907-S2919.
2. Croquet V, Pilette C, Lespine A, Vuillemin E, Rousselet MC, Oberti F, Saint Andre JP, Periquet B,
Francois S, Ifrah N, Cales P. Hepatic hyper-vitaminosis A: importance of retinyl ester level
determination. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:361-364.
3. Krasinski SD, Russell RM, Otradovec CL, Sadowski JA, Hartz SC, Jacob RA, McGandy RB. Relationship
of vitamin A and vitamin E intake to fasting plasma retinol, retinol-binding protein, retinyl esters,
carotene, alpha-tocopherol, and cholesterol among elderly people and young adults: increased plasma
retinyl esters among vitamin A-supplement users. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;49:112-120.
4. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2000.
5. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamine, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate,
Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
6. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
7. Russell RM. New views on RDAs for older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:515-518.
8. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient supplementation. J Am Diet Assoc.
2009;109:2073-2085.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-9-2 3/3
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Mineral Intake (Specify)
Note: Whenever possible, nutrient intake data should be considered in combination with clinical,
biochemical, anthropometric information, medical diagnosis, clinical status, and/or other factors to
provide a valid assessment of nutritional status based on a totality of the evidence. (Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2000.)
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs due to prolonged catabolic illness, malabsorption,
hyperexcretion, nutrient/drug and nutrient/nutrient interaction, growth and maturation
Decreased ability to consume sufficient amount of a mineral(s)
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Cultural practices that affect ability to access food
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning food and supplemental sources of minerals
Misdiagnosis of lactose intolerance/lactase deficiency; perception of conflicting nutrition messages; less
than optimal reliance on supplements
Psychological causes, eg, depression or eating disorders
Environmental causes, eg, inadequately tested nutrient bioavailability of fortified foods, beverages, and
supplements; less than optimal marketing of fortified foods/beverages/supplements as a substitute for
natural food source of nutrient(s)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-1 1/4
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Mineral Intake (Specify)
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Calcium: bone mineral content (BMC) ↓ the young adult mean. Hypocalciuria,
serum 25(OH)D < 32 ng/mL
↓ Phosphorus, < 2.6 mg/dL (0.84 mmol/L)
↓ Ferritin in patient/client with a ↓ Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
↓ Zinc, plasma
↓ Magnesium, <1.8 mg/dL (0.7 mmol/L)
Iron: ↓ hemoglobin < 13 g/L (2 mmol/L) (males); < 12 g/L (1.86 mmol/L)
Biochemical Data, (females)
Medical Tests and Iodine: ↓ urinary excretion < 100 µg/L (788 nmol/L)
Procedures Copper: ↓ serum copper < 64 µg/dL (10 µmol/L)
↓ Selenium, plasma
↓ Fluoride, plasma
↓ Manganese, serum
↓ Molybdenum, serum
↓ Boron, serum or plasma
Changes in urine labs associated with kidney stones
Client History*** Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, eg, malabsorption as a result
of celiac disease, short bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, or post-
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-1 2/4
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Mineral Intake (Specify)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM, Bray GA, Vogt TM, Cutler JA,
Windhauser MM, Lin P-H, Karanja N. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood
pressure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1117-1124.
2. Bermejo F, Garcia-Lopez S. A guide to diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in
digestive diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 4638–4643.
3. Heaney RP. Role of dietary sodium in osteoporosis. J Am Coll Nutr. 25(3 suppl):S271-S276. 2006.
4. Heaney RP. Nutrients, interactions, and foods: the Importance of Source. In Burckhardt P, Dawson-
Hughes B, Heaney RP, eds. Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier;
2004:61-76.
5. Heaney RP. Nutrients, interactions, and foods. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and the health of the calcium
economy. In Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney RP, eds. Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis. 2nd
ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2004:227-244.
6. Heaney RP, Rafferty K, Bierman J. Not all calcium-fortified beverages are equal. Nutr Today.
2005;40:39-41.
7. Heaney RP, Dowell MS, Hale CA, Bendich A. Calcium absorption varies within the reference range for
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22:142-146.
8. Heaney RP, Dowell MS, Rafferty K, Bierman J. Bioavailability of the calcium in fortified soy imitation
milk, with some observations on method. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1166-1169.
9. Hedera P, Peltier A, Fink JK, Wilcock S, London Z, Brewer GJ. Myelopolyneuropathy and pancytopenia
due to copper deficiency and high zinc levels of unknown origin II. The denture cream is a primary cause
of excessive zinc. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:996-999.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-1 3/4
12/13/21, 11:49 AM Inadequate Mineral Intake (Specify)
10. Holick MF. Functions of vitamin D: importance for prevention of common cancers, Type I diabetes and
heart disease. In Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney RP, eds. Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis.
2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc.; 2004:181-201
11. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 2010.
12. Lim LS, Hoeksema LJ, Sherin K, ACPM Prevention Practice Committee. Screening for Osteoporosis in
the Adult U.S. Population: ACPM Position Statement on Preventive Practice. Am J Prev Med.
2009;36:366-375.
13. Massey LK, Whiting SJ. Dietary salt, urinary calcium, and bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:731-
736.
14. Suaraz FL, Savaiano D, Arbisi P, Levitt MD. Tolerance to the daily ingestion of two cups of milk by
individuals claiming lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1502-1506.
15. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Hyperzincemia from ingestion of denture adhesives. J
Prosthet Dent.2010;103:380-383.
16. Thys-Jacobs S, Donovan D, Papadopoulos A, Sarrel P, Bilezikian JP. Vitamin D and calcium
dysregulation in the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Steroids. 1999;64:430-435.
17. Thys-Jacobs S, Starkey P, Bernstein D, Tian J. Calcium carbonate and the premenstrual syndrome: effects
on premenstrual and menstrual symptomatology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:444-452.
18. Zemel MB, Thompson W, Milstead A, Morris K, Campbell P. Calcium and dairy acceleration of weight
and fat loss during energy restriction in obese adults. Obesity Res. 2004;12:582-590.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.20 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-1 4/4
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Excessive Mineral Intake (Specify)
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning food and supplemental sources of minerals
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Food faddism
Accidental oversupplementation
Overconsumption of a limited variety of foods
Lack of knowledge about management of a disorder altering mineral homeostasis
Lack of knowledge about management of a disease state requiring mineral restriction
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Changes in appropriate laboratory values, such as:
Medical Tests and
↑ TSH (excessive iodine intake)
Procedures
↓ HDL (excessive zinc intake)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-2 1/3
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Excessive Mineral Intake (Specify)
Anthropometric
Measurements
Hair and nail changes
Extraskeletal calcifications, affecting vasculature or skin
Puritis
Anorexia
Nutrition Focused GI disturbances
Physical Findings Enamel or skeletal fluorosis
Central nervous system effects
Verbalizes inaccurate or incomplete knowledge
Verbalizes unsupported beliefs and attitudes
Heart failure
Kidney disease
Client History*** Liver damage
Parenteral nutrition
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium,
Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, Zinc. Washington, DC:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-2 2/3
12/13/21, 11:50 AM Excessive Mineral Intake (Specify)
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-101 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNI-5-10-2 3/3
12/14/21, 8:31 AM Swallowing Difficulty
SWALLOWING DIFFICULTY
Mechanical causes, eg, inflammation, surgery, stricture; or oral, pharyngeal and esophageal tumors; prior
mechanical ventilation
Motor causes, eg, neurological or muscular disorders, such as cerebral palsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis,
scleroderma; or prematurity, altered suck, swallow, breathe patterns
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and Radiological findings, eg, abnormal swallow study
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Evidence of dehydration, eg, dry mucous membranes, poor skin turgor
Physical Findings
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-1 1/2
12/14/21, 8:31 AM Swallowing Difficulty
Non-normal findings in cranial nerves and (CN VII) muscles of facial expression,
(Nerve IX) gag reflex, swallow (Nerve X) and tongue range of motions (Nerve
XII), cough reflex, drooling, facial weakness, and ability to perform and wet and
dry swallow
Coughing, choking, prolonged chewing, pouching of food, regurgitation, facial
expression changes during eating, drooling, noisy wet upper airway sounds,
feeling of “food getting stuck,” pain while swallowing
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, ed. Harrison’s Principles of
Internal Medicine. 15th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
2. Brody R, Touger-Decker R, O’Sullivan-Maillet J. The effectiveness of dysphagia screening by an RD on
the determination of dysphagia risk. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1029-1037.
3. Huhmann M, Touger-Decker R, Byham-Gray L, O’Sullivan-Maillet J, Von Hagen S. Comparison of
dysphagia screening by a registered dietitian in acute stroke patients to speech language pathologist’s
evaluation. Topics in Clinical Nutrition. 2004;19:239-249.
4. Groher ME. Dysphagia Diagnosis and Management. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-1 2/2
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Biting/Chewing (Masticatory) Difficulty
Craniofacial malformations
Oral surgery
Neuromuscular dysfunction
Partial or complete edentulism
Soft tissue disease (primary or oral manifestations of a systemic disease)
Xerostomia
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-2 1/3
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Biting/Chewing (Masticatory) Difficulty
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Bailey R, Ledikwe JH, Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Jensen GL. Persistent oral health problems
associated with comorbidity and impaired diet quality in older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1273-
1276.
2. Chernoff R, ed. Oral health in the elderly. Geriatric Nutrition. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers;
1999.
3. Dormenval V, Mojon P, Budtz-Jorgensen E. Association between self-assessed masticatory ability,
nutritional status and salivary flow rate in hospitalized elderly. Oral Diseases. 1999;5:32-38.
4. Hildebrand GH, Dominguez BL, Schork MA, Loesche WJ. Functional units, chewing, swallowing and
food avoidance among the elderly. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:585-595.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-2 2/3
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Biting/Chewing (Masticatory) Difficulty
5. Hirano H, Ishiyama N, Watanabe I, Nasu I. Masticatory ability in relation to oral status and general health
in aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3:48-52.
6. Huhmann M, Touger-Decker R, Byham-Gray L, O’Sullivan-Maillet J, Von Hagen S. Comparison of
dysphagia screening by a registered dietitian in acute stroke patients to speech language pathologist’s
evaluation. Top Clin Nutr. 2004;19:239-249.
7. Kademani D, Glick M. Oral ulcerations in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus:
clinical presentations, diagnosis, management and relevance to disease progression. Quintessence
International. 1998;29:1103-1108.
8. Keller HH, Ostbye T, Bright-See E. Predictors of dietary intake in Ontario seniors. Can J Public Health.
1997;88:303-309.
9. Krall E, Hayes C, Garcia R. How dentition status and masticatory function affect nutrient intake. J Am
Dent Assoc. 1998;129:1261-1269.
10. Joshipura K, Willett WC, Douglass CW. The impact of edentulousness on food and nutrient intake. J Am
Dent Assoc. 1996;127:459-467.
11. Mackle T, Touger-Decker R, O’Sullivan Maillet J, Holland B. Registered dietitians’ use of physical
assessment parameters in practice. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;103:1632-1638.
12. Mobley C, Saunders M. Oral health screening guidelines for nondental healthcare providers. J Am Diet
Assoc. 1997;97:S123-S126.
13. Morse D. Oral and pharyngeal cancer. In: Touger-Decker R, Sirois D, Mobley C, eds. Nutrition and oral
medicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005:205-222.
14. Moynihan P, Butler T, Thomason J, Jepson N. Nutrient intake in partially dentate patients: the effect of
prosthetic rehabilitation. J Dent. 2000;28:557-563.
15. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Oral health and nutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2013;113:693-701.
16. Sayhoun NR, Lin CL, Krall E. Nutritional status of the older adult is associated with dentition status. J
Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:61-66.
17. Sheiham A, Steele JG. The impact of oral health on stated ability to eat certain foods: finding from the
national diet and nutrition survey of older people in Great Britain. Gerodontology. 1999;16:11-20.
18. Ship J, Duffy V, Jones J, Langmore S. Geriatric oral health and its impact on eating. J Am Geriatr Soc.
1996;44:456-464.
19. Touger-Decker R. Clinical and laboratory assessment of nutrition status. Dent Clin North Am.
2003;47:259-278.
20. Touger-Decker R, Sirois D, Mobley C, eds. Nutrition and Oral Medicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press;
2005.
21. Walls AW, Steele JG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, Moynihan PJ. Oral health and nutrition in older people. J
Public Health Dent. 2000;60:304-307.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-2 3/3
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Breastfeeding Difficulty
BREASTFEEDING DIFFICULTY
Mother:
Infant:
Painful breasts, nipples
Difficulty latching on
Breast or nipple abnormality
Poor sucking ability
Mastitis
Oral pain
Perception of or actual inadequate breastmilk*
Malnutrition/ malabsorption
supply
Lethargy, sleepiness
Limited social or environmental support
Irritability
Cultural practices that affect the ability to
Introduction of feeding via bottle or other route
breastfeed
that may affect breastfeeding
Introduction of feeding via bottle or other route
Swallowing difficulty
that may affect breastfeeding
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-3 1/3
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Breastfeeding Difficulty
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data, Laboratory evidence of dehydration (infant)
Medical Tests and Fewer than reference standard, eg, six wet diapers in 24 hours (infant)
Procedures
Anthropometric Any weight loss or limited weight gain (infant)
Measurements
Frenulum abnormality (infant)
Nutrition Focused Vomiting or diarrhea (infant)
Physical Findings Hunger, limited satiety after feeding (infant)
Coughing
Crying, latching on and off, pounding on breasts
Decreased feeding frequency/duration, early cessation of feeding, and/or feeding
resistance
Lethargy
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “breastmilk” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “human milk.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-3 2/3
12/14/21, 8:35 AM Breastfeeding Difficulty
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Batista CLC, Ribeiro VS, Nascimento M, Rodrigues VP. Association between pacifier use and bottle-
feeding and unfavorable behaviors during breastfeeding. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94(6):596-601.
2. Brill H. Approach to milk protein allergy in infants. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille
canadien. 2008;54(9):1258-1264.
3. Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute. https://sph.unc.edu/cgbi/publications/. Accessed February 18,
2019.
4. Collins CT, Makrides M, Gillis J, McPhee AJ. Avoidance of bottles during the establishment of breast
feeds in preterm infants. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2008(4):Cd005252.
5. Fleurant E, Schoeny M, Hoban R, et al. Barriers to human milk feeding at discharge of very-low-birth-
weight infants: Maternal goal setting as a key social factor. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:20-27.
6. Jaafar SH, Ho JJ, Jahanfar S, Angolkar M. Effect of restricted pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants
for increasing duration of breastfeeding. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
2016(8):Cd007202.
7. Kair LR, Colaizy TT. Association between in-hospital pacifier use and breastfeeding continuation and
exclusivity: Neonatal intensive care unit admission as a possible effect modifier. Breastfeed Med.
2017;12:12-19.
8. Larson-Nath C, Biank VF. Clinical review of failure to thrive in pediatric patients. Pediatr Ann.
2016;45(2):e46-49.
9. Lessen R, Kavanagh K. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: Promoting and supporting
breastfeeding. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(3):444-449.
10. Newman J. Breastfeeding problems associated with the early introduction of bottles and pacifiers. J Hum
Lact. 1990;6(2):59-63.
11. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding
practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491-504.
12. Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar MJ, et al. Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(467):114-134.
13. Walker M. Conquering common breast-feeding problems. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(4):267-274.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-3 3/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Altered Gastrointestinal (GI) Function
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Abnormal digestive enzyme and fecal studies
Medical Tests and Abnormal hydrogen breath test, d-xylose test, stool culture, and gastric emptying
Procedures and/or bowel transit time
Endoscopic or colonoscopy examination, abdominal scan, biopsy results
Abnormal pH, sphincter, motility, morphology or reflux studies
Abnormal anemia profile
Abnormal vitamin, mineral, fatty acid, trace element, and PTH results
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-4 1/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Altered Gastrointestinal (GI) Function
Abdominal distension
Increased (or sometimes decreased) bowel sounds
Wasting due to malnutrition in severe cases
Nutrition Focused Anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, steatorrhea, constipation, abdominal pain,
Physical Findings reflux, gas, belching, flatus, bloating, fecal incontinence
Evidence of vitamin and/or mineral deficiency, eg, glossitis, cheilosis, mouth
lesions, skin rashes, hair loss
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Beyer P. Gastrointestinal disorders: roles of nutrition and the dietetics practitioner. J Am Diet Assoc.
1998;98:272-277.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc.
2008;108:1716-1731.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-4 2/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Altered Gastrointestinal (GI) Function
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-4 3/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Predicted Breastfeeding Difficulty
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Population-based biochemical data that may hinder breastfeeding
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-5 1/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Predicted Breastfeeding Difficulty
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-1-5 3/3
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Impaired Nutrient Utilization
Compromised endocrine function of related GI organs, eg, pancreas, liver, pituitary, parathyroid
Metabolic disorders, including inborn errors of metabolism
Medications that affect nutrient metabolism
Alcohol or drug addiction
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Abnormal protein, fatty acid or carbohydrate metabolism profile tests
Medical Tests, and Abnormal liver function tests
Procedures Abnormal anemia profile
Abnormal pituitary hormones (growth hormone [GH], adrenocorticotropic
hormone [ACTH], luteinizing hormone [LH] and follicle-stimulating hormone
[FSH])
Vitamin and/or mineral deficiency
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-1 1/2
12/14/21, 8:42 AM Impaired Nutrient Utilization
Hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia
Abnormal PTH
Positive result for urine porphyrins
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Filippatos TD, Derdemezis CS, Gazi IF, Nakou ES, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS. Orlistat-associated
adverse effects and drug interactions: a critical review. Drug Saf. 2008;31:53-65.
2. Ke ZJ, Wang X, Fan Z, Luo J. Ethanol promotes thiamine deficiency-induced neuronal death:
involvement of double-stranded MA-activated protein kinase. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:1097-103
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-1 2/2
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Altered Nutrition Related Laboratory Values (Specify)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ AST, ALT, T. bili, serum ammonia (liver disorders)
Medical Tests ↑ BUN, ↑ Cr, ↑ K, ↑ phosphorus, ↓ glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (kidney
and Procedures disorders)
Altered pO2 and pCO2 (pulmonary disorders)
↑ Serum lipids
↑ Plasma glucose and/or HgbA1c levels
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-2 1/3
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Altered Nutrition Related Laboratory Values (Specify)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Beto JA, Bansal VK. Medical nutrition therapy in chronic kidney failure: integrating clinical practice
guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:404-409.
2. Davern II TJ, Scharschmidt BF. Biochemical liver tests. In Feldman M, Scharschmidt BF, Sleisenger MH,
eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gasrointestinal and Liver Disease, 6th ed, vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: WB
Saunders; 1998: 1112-1122.
3. Durose CL, Holdsworth M, Watson V, Przygrodzka F. Knowledge of dietary restrictions and the medical
consequences of noncompliance by patients on hemodialysis are not predictive of dietary compliance. J
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-2 2/3
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Altered Nutrition Related Laboratory Values (Specify)
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-2 3/3
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Food Medication Interaction (Specify)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and Alterations of biochemical tests based on medication affect and client condition
Procedures
Anthropometric Alterations of anthropometric measurements based on medication effect and client
Measurements conditions, eg, weight gain and corticosteroids
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-3 1/2
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Food Medication Interaction (Specify)
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Client History***
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McCabe-Sellers BJ, Skipper A. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Integration of medical
nutrition therapy and pharmacotherapy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(6):950-956.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-3 2/2
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Predicted Food Medication Interaction (Specify)
Note: Appropriate nutrition diagnosis when food–medication interaction is predicted, but has not yet
occurred. This nutrition diagnosis is used when the practitioner wants to prevent a nutrient-medication
interaction. Observed food medication interactions should be documented using Food Medication
Interaction (NC-2.3.1).
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-4 1/2
12/14/21, 8:43 AM Predicted Food Medication Interaction (Specify)
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Client History***
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. McCabe-Sellers BJ, Skipper A. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Integration of medical
nutrition therapy and pharmacotherapy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(6):950-956.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.15 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-2-4 2/2
12/14/21, 8:50 AM Underweight
UNDERWEIGHT
Underweight (NC-3.1)
Definition
Low body weight compared to established reference standards or recommendations.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and ↑ Measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) higher than expected and/or estimated
Procedures
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-1 1/3
12/14/21, 8:50 AM Underweight
Nutrition Focused Decreased muscle mass, muscle wasting (gluteal and temporal)
Physical Findings Hunger
Malnutrition
Illness or physical disability
Client History*** Mental illness, dementia, confusion
Athlete, dancer, gymnast
Vitamin/mineral deficiency
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Assessment of nutritional status. In: Kleinman R, ed. Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 5th ed. Elk Grove
Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2004:407-423.
2. Beck AM, Ovesen LW. At which body mass index and degree of weight loss should hospitalized elderly
patients be considered at nutritional risk? Clin Nutr. 1998;17:195-198.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-1 2/3
12/14/21, 8:50 AM Underweight
3. Blaum CS, Fries BE, Fiatarone MA. Factors associated with low body mass index and weight loss in
nursing home residents. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A:M162-M168.
4. Cook Z, Kirk S, Lawrenson S, Sandford S. Use of BMI in the assessment of undernutrition in older
subjects: reflecting on practice. Proc Nutr Soc. Aug 2005;64:313-317.
5. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food insecurity in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110:1368-1377.
6. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition security in developing nations: Sustainable
food, water, and health. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:581-595.
7. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating
disorders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1236-1241.
8. Ranhoff AH, Gjoen AU, Mowe M. Screening for malnutrition in elderly acute medical patients: the
usefulness of MNA-SF. J Nutr Health Aging. Jul-Aug 2005;9:221-225.
9. Reynolds MW, Fredman L, Langenberg P, Magaziner J. Weight, weight change, and mortality in a
random sample of older community-dwelling women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:1409-1414.
10. Schneider SM, Al-Jaouni R, Pivot X, Braulio VB, Rampal P, Hebuerne X. Lack of adaptation to severe
malnutrition in elderly patients. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:499-504.
11. Spear BA. Adolescent growth and development. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(suppl):S23- S29.
12. Sullivan DH, Walls RC. Protein-energy undernutrition and the risk of mortality within six years of
hospital discharge. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998;17:571-578.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-1 3/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Unintended* Weight Loss
Note: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis when changes in body weight are due to fluid.
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs, eg, due to prolonged catabolic illness, trauma,
malabsorption
Decreased ability to consume sufficient energy
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food given to elderly and/or
children
Cultural practices that affect ability to access food
Prolonged hospitalization
Psychological causes such as depression and disordered eating
Lack of self-feeding ability
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-2 1/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Unintended* Weight Loss
Fever
Decreased senses, ie, smell, taste, vision
Increased heart rate
Nutrition Focused Increased respiratory rate
Physical Findings Loss of subcutaneous fat and muscle stores
Change in way clothes fit
Changes in mental status or function (eg, depression)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym, or alternate word with the same meaning, for the term “unintended” is helpful or needed, an
approved alternate is the word “involuntary.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Collins N. Protein-energy malnutrition and involuntary weight loss: nutritional and pharmacologic
strategies to enhance wound healing. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;7:1121-1140.
2. Splett PL, Roth-Yousey LL, Vogelzang JL. Medical nutrition therapy for the prevention and treatment of
unintentional weight loss in residential healthcare facilities. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:352-362.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-2 2/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Unintended* Weight Loss
3. Wallace JL, Schwartz RS, LaCroix AZ, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Involuntary weight loss in older
patients: incidence and clinical significance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:329-337.
4. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Unintended weight loss in older adults evidence-based nutrition
practice guideline. http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=3651&library=EBG. Accessed
June 12, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-2 3/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Overweight/Obesity
OVERWEIGHT/OBESITY
Overweight/Obesity (NC-3.3)
Definition
Increased adiposity compared to established reference standards or recommendations, ranging from overweight
to morbid obesity.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and ↓ Measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) less than expected and/or estimated
Procedures
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-3 1/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Overweight/Obesity
Anthropometric BMI more than normative standard for age and sex:
Measurements Overweight: 25 to 29.9 (adults), 85th to 94th percentiles (pediatrics)
Obese Class I: 30 to 34.9 (adults)
Obese Class II: 35 to 39.9 (adults)
Obese Class III: 40+* (adults)
Obese > 95th percentile (pediatrics)
Waist circumference more than normative standard for age and sex
Increased skinfold thickness
Body fat percentage >25% for men and >32% for women
Weight for height more than normative standard for age and sex
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*If a synonym for the term “Obese Class III” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “morbid obesity.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-3 2/3
12/14/21, 8:51 AM Overweight/Obesity
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-3 3/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Unintended* Weight Gain
Illnesses or conditions causing unexpected weight gain because of eg, head trauma, immobility, paralysis
or related condition, Cushings's syndrome, hypothyroidism, other endocrine disorders
Chronic use of medications known to cause weight gain, such as use of certain antidepressants,
antipsychotics, corticosteroids, certain HIV medications
Condition leading to excessive fluid weight gains
Not ready for diet/lifestyle change
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↓ Serum albumin
Medical Tests and ↓ Sodium, serum
Procedures ↑ Fasting serum lipid levels
↑ Fasting glucose levels
Fluctuating hormone levels
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-4 1/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Unintended* Weight Gain
Cortisol
↑ Growth hormone
↑ Thyroid stimulating hormone
↓ Thyroxine (T4)
Fat accumulation, excessive subcutaneous fat stores, noticeable change in body fat
distribution
Extreme hunger with or without palpitations, tremor, and sweating
Nutrition Focused Edema
Physical Findings Shortness of breath
Muscle weakness
Fatigue
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
**If a synonym, or alternate word with the same meaning, for the term “unintended” is helpful or needed, an
approved alternate is the word “involuntary.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Kaiser LL, Campbell CG. Practice paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics abstract: nutrition and
lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(9):1447
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-4 2/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Unintended* Weight Gain
2. Procter SB, Campbell CG. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition and lifestyle for
a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(7):1099-1103.
3. Ogata BN, Hayes D. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition guidance for healthy
children ages 2 to 11 years. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(8):1257-1276.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-4 3/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Growth Rate Below Expected
Physiological impetus for increased nutrient needs (eg, critical illness or trauma; pregnancy; metabolic
illness, eg, type 1 diabetes; malabsorption)
Decreased ability to consume sufficient energy
Lack of or limited access to food
Psychological causes, such as depression or disordered eating pattern
Limited food acceptance
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit
Unsupported beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics
Small for gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction/retardation, lack of appropriate weight gain,
hyperemesis gravidarum
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-5 1/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Growth Rate Below Expected
Biochemical Data, Positive urine ketones, ↑ fasting (or postprandial) glucose level
Medical Tests and Fluctuating hormone levels during pregnancy
Procedures Zinc deficiency
Iron deficiency
Abnormal protein, fatty acid or carbohydrate metabolism profile
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-5 2/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Growth Rate Below Expected
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-5 3/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Excessive Growth Rate
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, ↑ Cortisol
Medical Tests and ↑ Growth hormone
Procedures ↑ Thyroid stimulating hormone
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-6 1/3
12/14/21, 8:52 AM Excessive Growth Rate
↓ Thyroxine (T4)
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
5. Morse K, et al. Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement. Best Practice & Research Clinical
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 23: 809-818.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-3-6 3/3
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Malnutrition (undernutrition)
MALNUTRITION (UNDERNUTRITION)
Adult malnutrition notes. There is an ongoing international effort to harmonize the definitions of adult
malnutrition.1 At present, the eNCPT malnutrition indicator criteria provided in the adult malnutrition
reference sheets reflect the malnutrition clinical characteristics (MCC) Academy/ASPEN Adult
Malnutrition Consensus Statement.2 Three additional validated nutrition assessment approaches, the
Subjective Global Assessment, the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, and the Mini-
Nutritional Assessment Long Form, to identify malnutrition are also in a chart that follows the MCC in
the adult malnutrition reference sheets and may be used to identify malnutrition*.
The Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends a minimum of two clinical
characteristics or indicators be present for diagnosis of malnutrition. For additional information please
visit the Academy’s Web page at: http://www.eatrightpro.org/resources/practice/practice-
resources/malnutrition.
Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric malnutrition
(undernutrition) etiologies
Signs/Symptoms (Defining Characteristics)
A typical cluster of subjective and objective signs and symptoms gathered during the nutrition assessment
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
Nutrition
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (two or more adult MCC indicators
Assessment
recommended to be present; one or more pediatric indicators)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric
Anthropometric
malnutrition (undernutrition) indicators
Measurements
Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric
Nutrition Focused
malnutrition (undernutrition) indicators
Physical Findings
Food/Nutrition- Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric
Related History malnutrition (undernutrition) indicators
Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric
Client History malnutrition (undernutrition) indicators
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1 1/2
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Malnutrition (undernutrition)
References
Please refer to the reference sheets for the type and severity of adult or pediatric malnutrition
(undernutrition) indicators
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.15 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1 2/2
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Starvation Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Note: There is an ongoing international effort to harmonize the definitions of adult malnutrition.1 At
present, the eNCPT malnutrition indicator criteria provided reflect the malnutrition clinical
characteristics (MCC) Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement.2 Three additional
validated nutrition assessment approaches, the Subjective Global Assessment, the Patient Generated
Subjective Global Assessment, and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Long Form, to identify malnutrition
are also in a chart that follows the MCC and may be used to identify malnutrition*.
The Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends a minimum of two clinical
characteristics or indicators be present for diagnosis of malnutrition. For additional information please
visit the Academy’s Web page at: https://www.eatrightpro.org/practice/practice-resources/malnutrition.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-1 1/5
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Starvation Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (two or more MCC indicators
Assessment
recommended to be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
Malnutrition can occur at any weight/BMI
Inadequate maternal weight gain
Anthropometric Moderate (non severe) malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of 20% in 1
Measurements year; 10% in 6 months; 7.5% in 3 months; 5% in 1 month
Severe malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of >20% in 1 year; >10%
in 6 months; >7.5% in 3 months; or >5% in 1 month
Severe malnutrition
Food/Nutrition- Estimated energy intake ≤ 50% of estimated energy requirement for ≥ 1 months
Related History Measurably reduced changes in grip strength or other functional indicators
Note. Handgrip strength in adults: norms are device dependent; can identify presence of
malnutrition but not quantify the degree of the deficit; may not be able to perform on
certain clients. Please refer to the Academy/ASPEN Adult and Pediatric Malnutrition
Consensus Statements for further information.
Client History*** Reports or observations of the following, for example:
Anorexia nervosa, benign esophageal stricture, abuse, neglect, poverty, frailty, and
anything that results in limited access to food (associated with malnutrition in the
context of environmental and social circumstances
Existing medical diagnosis of malnutrition including malnutrition
Genetic or acquired conditions: Cerebral Palsy, cystic fibrosis, seizure disorders,
metabolic disease, IBD
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-1 2/5
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Starvation Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
MCC's
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-1 3/5
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Starvation Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Cederholm T, Jensen G. To create a consensus on malnutrition diagnostic criteria: A report from the
global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) meeting at the ESPEN congress 2016. J Parent
Enteral Nutr. 2017; 36(1):7-10.
2. White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M, the Academy Malnutrition Work Group; the
A.S.P.E.N. Malnutrition Task Force; and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Consensus statement of the
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition:
Characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition
(undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(5):730-738.
3. Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS, Schlamm HT, Smith MF. Nutritional and metabolic assessment of
the hospitalized patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1977;1(1):11-22.
4. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.
5. Hagan JC. Acute and Chronic Diseases. In: RM M, ed. Encyclopedia of Health Services Research. Vol 1.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:25.
6. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, et al. Adult starvation and disease-related malnutrition: a proposal for
etiology-based diagnosis in the clinical practice setting from the International Consensus Guideline
Committee. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):156-159.
7. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data
and recommendations for future research directions. National Institutes of Health, American Society for
Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1977;21(3):133-156.
8. Keys A. Chronic undernutrition and starvation with notes on protein deficiency. J Amer Med Assoc.
1948;138:500-511.
9. Kondrup J. Can food intake in hospitals be improved? Clin Nutr. 2001;20:153-160.
10. Norman K, Stobaus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke J-D, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength : Outcome predictor
and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(2):135-142.
11. Rosenbaum K, Wang J, Pierson RN, Kotler DP. Time-dependent variation in weight and body
composition in healthy adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2000;24(2):52-55.
12. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed
February12, 2018.
13. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Serum proteins. 2009;
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=4302&conclusion_statement_id=251265&highlight=serum%20proteins&home=1. Accessed
February 12, 2018.
14. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library. Does serum prealbumin correlate with
nitrogen balance? http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/conclusion.cfm?
conclusion_statement_id=251315&highlight=prealbumin&home=1. Accessed February 12, 2018.
15. Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short physical performance battery in
hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21(6):445-452.
16. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower
extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-1 4/5
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Starvation Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-1 5/5
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Chronic Disease or Condition Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Note: There is an ongoing international effort to harmonize the definitions of adult malnutrition.1 At present, the eNCPT malnutrition indicator criteria
provided reflect the malnutrition clinical characteristics (MCC) Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement.2 Three additional validated
nutrition assessment approaches, the Subjective Global Assessment, the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, and the Mini-Nutritional
Assessment Long Form, to identify malnutrition are also in a chart that follows the MCC and may be used to identify malnutrition*.
The Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends a minimum of two clinical characteristics or indicators be present for diagnosis
of malnutrition. For additional information please visit the Academy’s Web page at: https://www.eatrightpro.org/practice/practice-resources/malnutrition.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment,
Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology categories. An additional useful resource to determine
the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Assessment
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (two or more MCC indicators recommended to be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Medical
Tests and Procedures
Malnutrition can occur at any weight/BMI
Inadequate maternal weight gain
Moderate (non severe) malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of 20% in 1 year; 10% in 6 months; 7.5% in 3
Anthropometric Measurements months; 5% in 1 month
Severe malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of >20% in 1 year; >10% in 6 months; >7.5% in 3 months; or >5%
in 1 month
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-2 1/3
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Chronic Disease or Condition Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Estimated energy intake < 75% of estimated energy requirement for ≥ 1 months
Severe malnutrition
Estimated energy intake < 75% of estimated energy requirement for ≥ 1 month
Measurably reduced changes in grip strength or other functional indicators
Note. Handgrip strength in adults: norms are device dependent; can identify presence of malnutrition but not quantify the degree
of the deficit; may not be able to perform on certain clients. Please refer to the Academy/ASPEN Adult and Pediatric Malnutrition
Consensus Statements for further information.
Reports or observations of the following, for example:
Organ failure, malignancies, rheumatoid diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, sarcopenic obesity, malabsorptive syndromes,
and other etiologies including but not limited to diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and chronic
Client History***
obstructive pulmonary disease (associated with malnutrition in the context of chronic disease/condition)
Existing medical diagnosis of malnutrition including malnutrition
Genetic or acquired conditions: Cerebral Palsy, cystic fibrosis, seizure disorders, metabolic disease, IBD
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
MCC's
Assessment Parameter SGA PG-SGA MNA-LFF
(this tool is not validated)
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition diagnosis status value from the Nutrition
Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Cederholm T, Jensen G. To create a consensus on malnutrition diagnostic criteria: A report from the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM)
meeting at the ESPEN congress 2016. J Parent Enteral Nutr. 2017; 36(1):7-10.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-2 2/3
12/14/21, 9:06 AM Chronic Disease or Condition Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
2. White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral
and Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet.
2012;112(5):730-738.
3. Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS, Schlamm HT, Smith MF. Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1977;1(1):11-22.
4. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.
5. Hagan JC. Acute and Chronic Diseases. In: RM M, ed. Encyclopedia of Health Services Research. Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:25.
6. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, et al. Adult starvation and disease-related malnutrition: a proposal for etiology-based diagnosis in the clinical practice
setting from the International Consensus Guideline Committee. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):156-159.
7. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research directions.
National Institutes of Health, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1977;21(3):133-156.
8. Keys A. Chronic undernutrition and starvation with notes on protein deficiency. J Amer Med Assoc. 1948;138:500-511.
9. Kondrup J. Can food intake in hospitals be improved? Clin Nutr. 2001;20:153-160.
10. Norman K, Stobaus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke J-D, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength : Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr.
2011;30(2):135-142.
11. Rosenbaum K, Wang J, Pierson RN, Kotler DP. Time-dependent variation in weight and body composition in healthy adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2000;24(2):52-55.
12. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed February 12, 2018.
13. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Serum proteins. 2009; http://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=4302&conclusion_statement_id=251265&highlight=serum%20proteins&home=1. Accessed February 12, 2018.
14. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library. Does serum prealbumin correlate with nitrogen balance?
http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/conclusion.cfm?conclusion_statement_id=251315&highlight=prealbumin&home=1. Accessed February 12, 2018.
15. Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short physical performance battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res.
2009;21(6):445-452.
16. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported
disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994:40(2):M85-M94.
17. Hand RK, Murphy WJ, Field LB, et al. Validation of the Academy/A.S.P.E.N. malnutrition clinical characteristics. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(5):856–864.
18. Scored Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Available at http://pt-global.org/. Accessed February 12, 2018.
19. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini Nutritional Assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts Res
Gerontol. 1994;4(suppl 2):15-59.
20. Mini-Nutrition Assessment Long Form. Available at http://mna-elderly.com/. Accessed February 12, 2018.
21. Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R, et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition - An ESPEN consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):335-340
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-2 3/3
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Acute Disease or Injury Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Note: There is an ongoing international effort to harmonize the definitions of adult malnutrition.1 At present, the eNCPT malnutrition indicator criteria
provided reflect the malnutrition clinical characteristics (MCC) Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement.2 Three additional validated
nutrition assessment approaches, the Subjective Global Assessment, the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, and the Mini-Nutritional
Assessment Long Form, to identify malnutrition are also in a chart that follows the MCC and may be used to identify malnutrition*.
The Academy/ASPEN Adult Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends a minimum of two clinical characteristics or indicators be present for diagnosis
of malnutrition. For additional information please visit the Academy’s Web page at: https://www.eatrightpro.org/practice/practice-resources/malnutrition.
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment,
Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology categories. An additional useful resource to determine
the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Assessment
Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (two or more MCC indicators recommended to be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Medical
Tests, and Procedures
Malnutrition can occur at any weight/BMI
Inadequate maternal weight gain
Anthropometric Measurements Moderate (non severe) malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of 7.5% in 3 months; 5% in 1 month; or 1-2% in 1
week
Severe malnutrition: Unintentional weight loss, adults, of >7.5% in 3 months; or >5% in 1 month; or >2% in 1 week
Estimated energy intake < 75% of estimated energy requirement for > 7 days
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-3 1/3
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Acute Disease or Injury Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Severe malnutrition
Estimated energy intake ≤ 50% of estimated energy requirement for ≥ 5 days
Measurably reduced changes in grip strength or other functional indicators
Note. Handgrip strength in adults: norms are device dependent; can identify presence of malnutrition but not quantify the degree
of the deficit; may not be able to perform on certain clients. Please refer to the Academy/ASPEN Adult and Pediatric Malnutrition
Consensus Statements for further information.
Reports or observations of the following, for example:
Major infections such as sepsis, pneumonia, peritonitis, and wound infections, major burns, trauma, closed head injury,
Client History*** acute lung injury, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and selected major surgeries (associated with malnutrition in the
context of acute injury/illness)
Preexisting medical diagnosis of malnutrition
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
MCC's
Assessment Parameter SGA PG-SGA MNA-LFALF
(this tool is not validated)
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition diagnosis status value from the Nutrition
Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Cederholm T, Jensen G. To create a consensus on malnutrition diagnostic criteria: A report from the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM)
meeting at the ESPEN congress 2016. J Parent Enteral Nutr. 2017; 36(1):7-10.
2. White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral
and Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet.
2012;112(5):730-738.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-3 2/3
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Acute Disease or Injury Related Malnutrition (undernutrition)
3. Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS, Schlamm HT, Smith MF. Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1977;1(1):11-22.
4. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11(1):8-13.
5. Hagan JC. Acute and Chronic Diseases. In: RM M, ed. Encyclopedia of Health Services Research. Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:25.
6. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, et al. Adult starvation and disease-related malnutrition: a proposal for etiology-based diagnosis in the clinical practice
setting from the International Consensus Guideline Committee. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):156-159.
7. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research directions.
National Institutes of Health, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr. 1977;21(3):133-156.
8. Keys A. Chronic undernutrition and starvation with notes on protein deficiency. J Amer Med Assoc. 1948;138:500-511.
9. Kondrup J. Can food intake in hospitals be improved? Clin Nutr. 2001;20:153-160.
10. Norman K, Stobaus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke J-D, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength : Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr.
2011;30(2):135-142.
11. Rosenbaum K, Wang J, Pierson RN, Kotler DP. Time-dependent variation in weight and body composition in healthy adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.
2000;24(2):52-55.
12. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed February 12, 2018.
13. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library: Serum proteins. 2009; http://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=4302&conclusion_statement_id=251265&highlight=serum%20proteins&home=1. Accessed February 12, 2018.
14. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library. Does serum prealbumin correlate with nitrogen balance?
http://www.andevidencelibrary.com/conclusion.cfm?conclusion_statement_id=251315&highlight=prealbumin&home=1. Accessed February 12, 2018.
15. Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short physical performance battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res.
2009;21(6):445-452.
16. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported
disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994:40(2):M85-M94.
17. Hand RK, Murphy WJ, Field LB, et al. Validation of the Academy/A.S.P.E.N. malnutrition clinical characteristics. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(5):856–864.
18. Scored Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Available at http://pt-global.org/. Accessed February 12, 2018.
19. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini Nutritional Assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts Res
Gerontol. 1994;4(suppl 2):15-59.
20. Mini-Nutrition Assessment Long Form. Available at http://mna-elderly.com/. Accessed February 12, 2018.
21. Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R, et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition - An ESPEN consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):335-340
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-3 3/3
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Non Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
The Academy/ASPEN Pediatric Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends specific indicators when
only one indicator is present and additional indicators when two or more indicators are present for
diagnosis of malnutrition.
For additional information please visit the Academy’s Web page at:
https://www.eatrightpro.org/practice/practice-resources/malnutrition.
Lack of or limited access to food, eg, economic constraints, restricting food/feedings given to children,
neglect or abuse, adoption/immigration/refugee from or in poorly resourced or war-torn countries
Interruptions of or intolerance to feedings
Social, economic, behavioral, cultural or religious practices that affect the ability to access food
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-4 1/4
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Non Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests, and
Procedures
When a single data point is available
Mild malnutrition
-1 to -1.9 weight for length z score
-1 to -1.9 body mass index for age z score
-1 to -1.9 mid upper arm circumference z score
Moderate malnutrition
-2 to -2.9 weight for length z score
-2 to -2.9 body mass index for age z score
-2 to -2.9 mid-upper arm circumference z score
Severe malnutrition
-3 weight for length z score or below
-3 body mass index for age z score or below
-3 length/height for age z score or below
-3 mid-upper arm circumference z score or below
Mild malnutrition
<75% of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
5% usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 1 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
Moderate malnutrition
<50 % of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
7.5% usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 2 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
Severe malnutrition
<25 % of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
10 % usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 3 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
Severe malnutrition
Severe loss of subcutaneous fat, eg, orbital, triceps, fat overlying the ribs
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-4 2/4
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Non Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Severe muscle loss, eg, wasting of the temples (temporalis muscle), clavicles
(pectoralis & deltoids), shoulders (deltoids), interosseous muscles, scapula
(latissimus dorsi, trapezious, deltoids), thigh (quadriceps) and calf (gastrocnemius)
Severe localized or generalized fluid accumulation (extremities, vulvar/scrotal,
ascites)
Note: Handgrip strength in children > 6 years of age: norms are device dependent; can
identify presence of malnutrition but not quantify the degree of the deficit; may not be
able to perform on certain client. Please refer to the Academy/ASPEN Pediatric
Malnutrition Consensus Statement for further information.
Food/Nutrition-
When two or more data points are available
Related History
Mild malnutrition
Moderate malnutrition
Inadequate nutrient intake 26% to 50% estimated energy/protein need
Severe malnutrition
Inadequate nutrient intake of ≤25% estimated energy/protein need
Anorexia nervosa, abuse, neglect, poverty, frailty, and anything that results in
Client History*** limited access to food (associated with malnutrition in the context of
environmental and social circumstances)
Existing medical diagnosis of malnutrition
Assessment,
Monitoring and Subjective global nutritional assessment (SGNA) for children rating+
Evaluation Tools
* In the past, hepatic transport protein measures (eg, albumin and prealbumin) were used as indicators of
malnutrition. See the Evidence Analysis Library questions on this topic at
https://www.andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=4302. Accessed April 3, 2017.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-4 3/4
12/14/21, 9:11 AM Non Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-4 4/4
12/14/21, 9:12 AM Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
The Academy/ASPEN Pediatric Malnutrition Consensus Statement recommends specific indicators when
only one indicator is present and additional indicators when two or more indicators are present for
diagnosis of malnutrition.
For additional information please visit the Academy’s Web page at:
https://www.eatrightpro.org/practice/practice-resources/malnutrition.
Physiological causes increasing nutrient needs due to prematurity, genetic/congenital disorders, illness,
injury, or trauma
Inadequate intake related to anorexia or feeding intolerance
Alteration in gastrointestinal tract structure and/or function
Altered utilization of nutrients
Food- and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning amount of energy and amount and type of
dietary protein
Psychological causes, eg, depression or eating disorders
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-5 1/4
12/14/21, 9:12 AM Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
When a single data point is available
Mild malnutrition
-1 to -1.9 weight for length z score
-1 to -1.9 body mass index for age z score
-1 to -1.9 mid-upper arm circumference z score
Moderate malnutrition
-2 to -2.9 weight for length z score
-2 to -2.9 body mass index for age z score
-2 to -2.9 mid-upper arm circumference z score
Severe malnutrition
-3 weight for length z score or below
-3 body mass index for age z score or below
-3 length/height for age z score or below
-3 mid-upper arm circumference z score or below
Mild malnutrition
<75% of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
5% usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 1 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
Moderate malnutrition
<50 % of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
7.5% usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 2 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
Severe malnutrition
<25 % of the norm for expected weight gain velocity (< 2 y of age)
10 % usual body weight loss (2-20 y of age)
Decline of 3 z score in weight for length or BMI for age z score
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-5 2/4
12/14/21, 9:12 AM Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Severe malnutrition
Severe loss of subcutaneous fat, eg, orbital, triceps, fat overlying the ribs
Severe muscle loss, eg, wasting of the temples (temporalis muscle), clavicles
(pectoralis & deltoids), shoulders (deltoids), interosseous muscles, scapula
(latissimus dorsi, trapezious, deltoids), thigh (quadriceps) and calf (gastrocnemius)
Severe localized or generalized fluid accumulation (extremities, vulvar/scrotal,
ascites)
Note: Handgrip strength in children > 6 years of age: norms are device dependent; can
identify presence of malnutrition but not quantify the degree of the deficit; may not be
able to perform on certain clients. Please refer to the Academy/ASPEN Pediatric
Malnutrition Consensus Statement for further information.
Food/Nutrition-
When two or more data points are available
Related History
Mild malnutrition
Moderate malnutrition
Inadequate nutrient intake 26% to 50% estimated energy/protein need
Severe malnutrition
Inadequate nutrient intake of ≤25% estimated energy/protein need
Assessment,
Monitoring and Subjective global nutritional assessment (SGNA) for children rating+
Evaluation Tools
* In the past, hepatic transport protein measures (eg, albumin and prealbumin) were used as indicators of
malnutrition. See the Evidence Analysis Library questions on this topic at
https://www.andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=4302. Accessed April 3, 2017.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-5 3/4
12/14/21, 9:12 AM Illness Related Pediatric Malnutrition (undernutrition)
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNC-4-1-5 4/4
12/15/21, 8:53 AM Food and Nutrition Related Knowledge Deficit*
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-1 1/3
12/15/21, 8:53 AM Food and Nutrition Related Knowledge Deficit*
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit” is helpful or needed, an approved
alternate is “Limited food and nutrition related knowledge.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-1 2/3
12/15/21, 8:53 AM Food and Nutrition Related Knowledge Deficit*
7. US Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote a healthy diet. Am
J Prev Med. 2003;24:93-100.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-1 3/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Unsupported Beliefs/Attitudes About Food or Nutrition Related Topics
Definition
Beliefs/attitudes or practices about food, nutrition, and nutrition-related topics that are incompatible with sound
nutrition principles, nutrition care, or disease/condition (excluding disordered eating patterns and eating
disorders).
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-2 1/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Unsupported Beliefs/Attitudes About Food or Nutrition Related Topics
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Food faddism
Estimated intake that reflects an imbalance of nutrients/food groups
Food/Nutrition-
Avoidance of foods/food groups (eg, sugar, wheat, cooked foods)
Related History
Intake of nonfood items
Intake of complementary and alternative medicine products and dietary
supplements that may be unsupported for health
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Chapman GE, Beagan B. Women’s perspectives on nutrition, health, and breast cancer. J Nutr Educ
Behav. 2003;35:135-141.
2. Gonzalez VM, Vitousek KM. Feared food in dieting and non-dieting young women: a preliminary
validation of the Food Phobia Survey. Appetite. 2004;43:155-173.
3. Jowett SL, Seal CJ, Phillips E, Gregory W, Barton JR, Welfare MR. Dietary beliefs of people with
ulcerative colitis and their effect on relapse and nutrient intake. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:161-170.
4. Madden H, Chamberlain K. Nutritional health messages in women’s magazines: a conflicted space for
women readers. J Health Psychol. 2004;9:583-597.
5. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Dietary Supplement Fact sheets.
http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/list-all/. Accessed June 17, 2015.
6. Peters CL, Shelton J, Sharma P. An investigation of factors that influence the consumption of dietary
supplements. Health Mark Q. 2003;21:113-135.
7. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient supplementation. J Am Diet Assoc.
2009;109:2073-2085.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-2 2/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Unsupported Beliefs/Attitudes About Food or Nutrition Related Topics
8. Povey R, Wellens B, Conner M. Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: an
examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite. 2001;37:15-26.
9. Putterman E, Linden W. Appearance versus health: does the reason for dieting affect dieting behavior? J
Behav Med. 2004;27:185-204.
10. Salminen E, Heikkila S, Poussa T, Lagstrom H, Saario R, Salminen S. Female patients tend to alter their
diet following the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and breast cancer. Prev Med. 2002;34:529-535.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-2 3/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Not Ready for Diet/Lifestyle Change
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-3 1/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Not Ready for Diet/Lifestyle Change
Client History***
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-3 2/3
12/15/21, 8:54 AM Not Ready for Diet/Lifestyle Change
9. US Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote a healthy diet. Am
J Prev Med. 2003;24:93-100.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-3 3/3
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Self Monitoring Deficit*
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-4 1/3
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Self Monitoring Deficit*
Biochemical Data, Recorded data inconsistent with biochemical data, eg, estimated dietary intake is
Medical Tests and not consistent with biochemical data
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “Self-monitoring deficit” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “Limited self-
monitoring.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Behavior change strategies.
https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?
cat=3946&evidence_summary_id=250723&highlight=self%20monitoring&home=1. Accessed February
26, 2019.. 2004;27:S91-S93.
2. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/42/Supplement_1. Accessed February 4, 2019.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-4 2/3
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Self Monitoring Deficit*
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-4 3/3
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Disordered Eating Pattern
Notes: May not be an appropriate nutrition diagnosis for individuals with Limited food acceptance NI-
2.11.
A resource that may be helpful for Classification of eating disorders is the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-5 1/5
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Disordered Eating Pattern
Assessment
Category
↓ or ↑ cholesterol, abnormal lipid profiles
Hypoglycemia
Hyperglycemia, ↑ HgbA1c
Hypokalemia and hypochloremic alkalosis
Hypophosphatemia
Hypomagnesemia
↓serum Vitamin D
Hyponatremia
Biochemical Data, Hypothyroid
Medical Tests and ↑ blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
Procedures ↑ carbon dioxide (CO2)
Urine positive for ketones
Laboratory data indicating anemia
Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
↑ liver function tests
Hyperosmolarity, hypoosmolarity
Low luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, or testosterone
levels
Low bone mineralization findings
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-5 2/5
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Disordered Eating Pattern
Blood in stool
Muscle weakness
Muscle or joint pain
Dry mucus membranes
Absence of hunger cues
Acanthosis nigricans
Amenorrhea or disruption of menstrual cycle
Delay in sexual development and/or puberty
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-5 3/5
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Disordered Eating Pattern
Diagnosis, eg, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, other
specified feeding or eating disorder
History of mental health condition, depression, anxiety, obsessive/compulsive
disorder (OCD), personality disorders, substance abuse disorders, self injury
Family history of mental health condition, eating disorder, depression, OCD,
anxiety disorders
Osteoporosis, osteopenia
Client History*** Social isolation
Sexual abuse
Previous traumatic event(s)
Infertility
Gall bladder disease
Competitive or professional athlete
Bariatric surgery
Cardiac arrhythmias, bradycardia
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-5 4/5
12/15/21, 8:56 AM Disordered Eating Pattern
5. Costin C. The Eating Disorder Sourcebook: A Comprehensive Guide to the Causes, Treatments, and
Prevention of Eating Disorders. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2007.
6. Gaudiani JL. Sick Enough: A Guide to the Medical Complications of Eating Disorders. New York, NY:
Routledge; 2019.
7. Gorwood P, Blanchet-Collet C, Chartrel N, et al. New Insights in Anorexia Nervosa. Front Neurosci.
2016;10:256.
8. Herrin M. Larkin M. Nutrition Counseling in the Treatment of Eating Disorders. New York, NY:
Routledge; 2012.
9. The International Association of Eating Disorders Professionals Foundation. The CEDRD in Eating
Disorders Care.
http://www.iaedp.com/upload/Certification/Overview/General/iaedp_CEDRD_Booklet2018_with_TW_.p
df. Accessed February 4, 2019.
10. The International Association of Eating Disorders Professionals Foundation. Medical Management
Professionals in Eating Disorders Care.
http://www.iaedp.com/upload/iaedp_Medical_Management_Profess.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2019.
11. Keys A BJ, Henschel A, Mickelson O, Taylor HL. The Biology of Human Starvation. Vol 2nd.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1950.
12. Mehler PS, Brown C. Anorexia nervosa – medical complications. J Eat Disord. 2015;3(1):11.
13. Mehler PS, Rylander M. Bulimia Nervosa – medical complications. J Eat Disord. 2015;3(1):12.
14. Mehler PS, Walsh K. Electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities associated with purging behaviors. Int J Eat
Disord. 2016;49(3):311-318.
15. Metro North Hospital and Health Service Queensland Eating Disorder Service. A guide to admission and
inpatient treatment for people with eating disorders in Queensland
https://metronorth.health.qld.gov.au/rbwh/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/07/guide-to-admission-and-
inpatient-treatment-eating-disorder.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2019.
16. Nazar BP, Bernardes C, Peachey G, Sergeant J, Mattos P, Treasure J. The risk of eating disorders
comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Eat
Disord. 2016;49(12):1045-1057.
17. Ozier AD, Henry BW. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition intervention in the
treatment of eating disorders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(8):1236-1241.
18. Setnick J. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pocket Guide to Eating Disorders. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL:
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; 2016.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-5 5/5
12/15/21, 8:57 AM Limited Adherence to Nutrition Related Recommendations
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Signs/Symptoms(Defining Characteristics)
A typical cluster of subjective and objective signs and symptoms gathered during the nutrition assessment
process that provide evidence that a problem exists; quantify the problem and describe its severity.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-6 1/2
12/15/21, 8:57 AM Limited Adherence to Nutrition Related Recommendations
Nutrition Focused Negative body language, eg, frowning, limited eye contact, fidgeting, defensive
Physical Findings posture, crying (Note: body language varies by culture)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social
support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(3):304-312.
2. Crawford S. Promoting dietary change. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11(suppl A):14A-15A.
3. Kumanyika SK, Van Horn L, Bowen D, Perri MG, Rolls BJ, Czajkowski SM, Schron E. Maintenance of
dietary behavior change. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 suppl):S42-S56.
4. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Total diet approach to healthy eating. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113:307-317.
5. Shepherd R. Resistance to changes in diet. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61:267-272.
6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote a healthy diet. Am
J Prev Med. 2003;24:93-100.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-6 2/2
12/15/21, 8:57 AM Undesirable Food Choices*
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-7 1/3
12/15/21, 8:57 AM Undesirable Food Choices*
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and ↑ lipid panel
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Findings consistent with vitamin/mineral deficiency or excess
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Estimated intake inconsistent with dietary reference intake standards (eg, DRIs),
national food guidelines (eg, US Dietary Guidelines, MyPlate), diet quality index
Food/Nutrition- standards (eg, Healthy Eating Index), or nutrition prescription
Related History Inaccurate or incomplete understanding of the guidelines
Inability to apply guideline information
Inability to select (eg, access), or unwillingness or disinterest in selecting, food
consistent with the guidelines
Client History*** Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, eg, mental illness
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*If a synonym for the term “Undesirable food choices” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is
“Unbalanced diet.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Birch LL, Fisher JA. Appetite and eating behavior in children. Pediatr Clin North Am.1995;42:931-953.
2. Butte N, Cobb K, Dwyer J, Graney L, Heird W, Richard K. The start healthy feeding guidelines for
infants and toddlers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004:104:3:442-454.
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Interventions for the prevention and treatment
of pediatric overweight and obesity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:1375-1394.
4. Dolecek TA, Stamlee J, Caggiula AW, Tillotson JL, Buzzard IM. Methods of dietary and nutritional
assessment and intervention and other methods in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Am J Clin
Nutr. 1997;65(suppl):196S-210S.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-7 2/3
12/15/21, 8:57 AM Undesirable Food Choices*
5. Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R. Increasing fruit and
vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obesity Res.
2001;9:171-178.
6. Freeland-Graves J, Nitzke S. Total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information. J Am
Diet Assoc. 2002;102:100-108.
7. French SA. Pricing effects on food choices. J Nutr. 2003;133:S841-S843.
8. Glens K, Basil M, Mariachi E, Goldberg J, Snyder D. Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition,
cost, convenience and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc.
1998;98:1118-1126.
9. Hampl JS, Anderson JV, Mullis R. The role of dietetics professionals in health promotion and disease
prevention. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1680-1687.
10. Lin SH, Guthrie J, Frazao E. American childrens’ diets are not making the grade. Food Review.
2001;24:8-17.
11. Satter E. Feeding dynamics: helping children to eat well. J Pediatr Health Care. 1995;9:178-184.
12. Story M, Holt K, Sofka D, eds. Bright Futures in Practice: Nutrition. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: National
Center for Education in Maternal Child Health; 2002.
13. Pelto GH, Levitt E, Thairu L. Improving feeding practices, current patterns, common constraints and the
design of interventions. Food Nutr Bull. 2003;24:45-82.
14. US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Information Service. MyPlate. 2011.
http://www.choosemyplate.gov. Accessed June 12, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-1-7 3/3
12/15/21, 9:00 AM Physical Inactivity*
PHYSICAL INACTIVITY*
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:00 AM Physical Inactivity*
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Anthropometric Obesity: BMI > 30 (adults), BMI > 95th percentile (pediatrics > 3 years)
Measurements
Nutrition Focused Excessive subcutaneous fat and low muscle mass
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Medical diagnoses that may be associated with or result in decreased activity, eg,
Client History*** arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, morbid obesity, knee surgery
Psychological diagnosis, eg, depression, anxiety disorders
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “Physical inactivity” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “Limited physical
activity.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Interventions for the prevention and treatment
of pediatric overweight and obesity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:1375-1394.
2. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Total diet approach to healthy eating. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2013;113:307-317.
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The role of nutrition in health promotion and chronic
disease prevention. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:972-979.
4. Levine JA, Lanninghav-Foster LM, McCrady SK, Krizan AC, Olson LR, Kane PH, Jensen MD, Clark
MM. Interindividual variation in posture allocation: Possible role in human obesity. Science.
2005;307:584-586.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:00 AM Physical Inactivity*
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.48 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Excessive Physical Activity
Disordered eating
Irrational beliefs/attitudes about food, nutrition, and fitness
“Addictive” behaviors/personality
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
↑ Liver enzymes, eg, LDH, AST
Biochemical Data, Altered micronutrient status, eg, ↓ serum ferritin, zinc, and insulin-like growth
Medical Tests and factor-binding protein
Procedures ↑ Hematocrit
Possibly ↑ cortisol levels
Anthropometric Weight loss, arrested growth and development, failure to gain weight during period
Measurements of expected growth (related usually to disordered eating)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Excessive Physical Activity
Nutrition Focused Depleted adipose and somatic protein stores (related usually to disordered eating)
Physical Findings Chronic muscle soreness
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Aissa-Benhaddad A, Bouix D, Khaled S, Micallef JP, Mercier J, Bringer J, Brun JF. Early hemorheologic
aspects of overtraining in elite athletes. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 1999;20:117-125.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
3. Davis C, Brewer H, Ratusny D. Behavioral frequency and psychological commitment: necessary
concepts in the study of excessive exercising. J Behav Med. 1993;16:611-628.
4. Davis C, Claridge G. The eating disorder as addiction: a psychobiological perspective. Addict Behav.
1998;23:463-475.
5. Davis C, Kennedy SH, Ravelski E, Dionne M. The role of physical activity in the development and
maintenance of eating disorders. Psychol Med. 1994;24:957-967.
6. Klein DA, Bennett AS, Schebendach J, Foltin RW, Devlin MJ, Walsh BT. Exercise “addiction” in
anorexia nervosa: model development and pilot data. CNS Spectr. 2004;9:531-537.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-2 2/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Excessive Physical Activity
7. Lakier-Smith L. Overtraining, excessive exercise, and altered immunity: is this a helper-1 vs helper-2
lymphocyte response? Sports Med. 2003;33:347-364.
8. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating
disorders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:1236-1241.
9. Shephard RJ, Shek PN. Acute and chronic over-exertion: do depressed immune responses provide useful
markers? Int J Sports Med. 1998;19:159-171.
10. Smith LL. Tissue trauma: the underlying cause of overtraining syndrome? J Strength Cond Res.
2004;18:185-193.
11. Urhausen A, Kindermann W. Diagnosis of overtraining: what tools do we have. Sports Med. 2002;32:95-
102.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Inability to Manage Self Care*
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-3 1/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Inability to Manage Self Care*
Assessment
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Diagnoses that are associated with self management, eg, diabetes mellitus, obesity,
cardiovascular disease, renal or liver disease
Client History*** Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, eg, cognitive or emotional
impairment
New medical diagnosis or change in existing diagnosis or condition
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “Inability to manage self care” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is
“Limited ability to manage self care.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
References
1. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition services for individuals with intellectual
and developmental disabilities and special health care needs. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:593-608.
2. Crawford S. Promoting dietary change. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11(suppl A):14A-15A.
3. Falk LW, Bisogni CA, Sobal J. Diet change processes of participants in an intensive heart program. J Nutr
Educ. 2000;32:240-250.
4. Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental
barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:556-561.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-3 2/3
12/15/21, 9:01 AM Inability to Manage Self Care*
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-3 3/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Impaired Ability to Prepare Foods/Meals*
Impaired cognitive ability, including learning disabilities, neurological or sensory impairment, and/or
dementia
Loss of mental or cognitive ability, eg, dementia
Physical disability
High level of fatigue or other side effect of therapy
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-4 1/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Impaired Ability to Prepare Foods/Meals*
Physical Findings
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “Impaired ability to prepare foods/meals” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate
is “Limited ability to prepare food and meals.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Andren E, Grimby G. Activity limitations in personal, domestic and vocational tasks: a study of adults
with inborn and early acquired mobility disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:262-271.
2. Andren E, Grimby G. Dependence in daily activities and life satisfaction in adult subjects with cerebral
palsy or spina bifida: a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:528-536.
3. Fortin S, Godbout L, Braun CM. Cognitive structure of executive deficits in frontally lesioned head
trauma patients performing activities of daily living. Cortex. 2003;39:273-291.
4. Godbout L, Doucet C, Fiola M. The scripting of activities of daily living in normal aging: anticipation
and shifting deficits with preservation of sequencing. Brain Cogn. 2000;43:220-224.
5. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Providing nutrition services for people with
developmental disabilities and special health care needs. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110: 296-307.
6. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food insecurity in the United States. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2015;115:593-608.J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:446-458.
7. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition security in developing nations: Sustainable
food, water, and health. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:581-595.
8. Sandstrom K, Alinder J, Oberg B. Descriptions of functioning and health and relations to a gross motor
classification in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1023-1031.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-4 2/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Impaired Ability to Prepare Foods/Meals*
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-4 3/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Poor Nutrition Quality of Life (NQOL)
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
Procedures
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-5 1/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Poor Nutrition Quality of Life (NQOL)
Anthropometric
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Physical Findings
Reports or observations of:
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bullinger M. The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire: interim results
of an international field study. In: Osoba D, ed. Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press; 1991:185-203.
2. Barr JT, Schumacher GE. The need for a nutrition-related quality-of-life measure. J Am Diet Assoc.
2003;103:177-180.
3. Barr JT, Schumacher GE. Using focus groups to determine what constitutes quality of life in clients
receiving medical nutrition therapy: first steps in the development of a nutrition quality-of-life survey. J
Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:844-851.
4. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc; 2003
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-5 2/3
12/15/21, 9:07 AM Poor Nutrition Quality of Life (NQOL)
5. Position of the American Dietetic Association on food insecurity in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110:1368-1377.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-5 3/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Self Feeding Difficulty
Physiological difficulty causing inability to physically grasp cups and utensils, support and/or control
head and neck, coordinate hand movement to mouth, close lips (or any other suckling issue), bend elbow
or wrist, sit with hips square and back straight
Limited physical strength or range of motion
Limited access to foods and/or adaptive eating devices conducive for self feeding
Limited vision
Impaired cognitive ability, including learning disabilities, neurological or sensory impairment, and/or
dementia
Reluctance or avoidance of self feeding
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-6 1/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Self Feeding Difficulty
Procedures
Anthropometric Weight loss
Measurements
Dry mucous membranes, hoarse or wet voice, tongue extrusion
Nutrition Focused Poor lip closure, drooling
Physical Findings Shortness of breath
Being provided with foods that may not be conducive to self feeding, eg, peas,
broth type soups
Dropping of cups, utensils
Emotional distress, anxiety, or frustration surrounding mealtimes
Challenges recognizing foods
Food/Nutrition- Forgets to eat
Related History Less than optimal use of food
Refusal to eat or chew
Dropping of food from utensil (splashing and spilling of food) on repeated
attempts to feed
Limited strength or stamina to lift utensils and/or cup
Utensil biting
Absence of recommended adaptive eating devices
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Consultant Dietitians in Healthcare Facilities. Dining Skills Supplement: Practical Interventions for
Caregivers of Eating Disabled Older Adults. Pensacola, FL: American Dietetic Association; 1992.
2. Morley JE. Anorexia of aging: physiological and pathologic. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:760-773.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-6 2/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Self Feeding Difficulty
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Providing nutrition services for people with
developmental disabilities and special health care needs. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:593-608.
4. Sandman P, Norberg A, Adolfsson R, Eriksson S, Nystrom L. Prevalence and characteristics of persons
with dependency on feeding at institutions. Scand J Caring Sci. 1990;4:121-127.
5. Siebens H, Trupe E, Siebens A, Cooke F, Anshen S, Hanauer R, Oster G. Correlates and consequences of
feeding dependency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:192-198.
6. Vellas B, Fitten LJ, eds. Research and Practice in Alzheimer’s Disease. New York, NY: Springer
Publishing Company; 1998.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-2-6 3/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Intake of Unsafe Food
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Positive stool culture for infectious causes, such as listeria, salmonella, hepatitis A,
Medical Tests and E. coli, cyclospora
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Intake of Unsafe Food
Procedures Toxicology reports for drugs, medicinals, poisons in blood or food samples
Anthropometric
Measurements
Evidence of dehydration, eg, dry mucous membranes, damaged tissues
Nutrition Focused Diarrhea, cramping, bloating, fever, nausea, vomiting, vision problems, chills,
Physical Findings dizziness, headache
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*If a synonym for the term “breastmilk” is helpful or needed, an approved alternate is “human milk.”
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnosis and Management of Foodborne Illnesses: A
Primer for Physicians and Other Health Care Professionals.
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5304a1.htm. Accessed June 12, 2015.
2. Partnership for Food Safety Education. http://www.fightbac.org. Accessed June 12, 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Intake of Unsafe Food
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food and water safety. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2014;114:1819-1829.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Limited Access to Food
Caregiver intentionally or unintentionally not providing access to food, eg, unmet needs for food or eating
assistance, excess of poor nutritional quality food, abuse/neglect
Community and geographical constraints for shopping and transportation
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning sufficient quantity or variety of culturally
appropriate healthful food
Limited financial resources or limited access to financial resources to purchase a sufficient quantity or
variety of culturally appropriate healthful foods
Limited food planning, purchasing, and preparation skills
Limited, absent, or limited participation in community supplemental food or other programs, eg, food
pantries, emergency kitchens, or shelters
Failure to participate in federal food programs, eg, WIC, National School Breakfast/Lunch Program, food
stamps
Schools lacking nutrition/wellness policies or application of policies ensuring convenient, appetizing,
competitively priced culturally appropriate healthful foods at meals, snacks, and school-sponsored
activities.
Physical or psychological limitations that diminish ability to shop, eg, walking, sight, mental/emotional
health
Limitation to food because of concerns about weight or aging
Factors contributing to a contaminated food supply
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:08 AM Limited Access to Food
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Indicators of macronutrient or vitamin/mineral status as indicated by biochemical
Medical Tests and findings
Procedures
Growth failure, based on reference growth standards, eg, National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS)
Anthropometric Underweight: BMI < 18.5 (adults)
Measurements Unintentional weight loss: adults, of > 10% in 6 months, > 5% in 1 month; any
unintentional weight loss in children
Overweight/obesity: BMI > 25 (adults), > 95 percentile (pediatrics)
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association on food insecurity in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110:1368-1377.
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition security in developing nations: Sustainable
food, water, and health. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:581-595.
4. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food and water safety. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2014;114:1819-1829.
5. US Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010.
http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/dietaryguidelines.htm. Accessed June 12, 2015.
6. US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Information Service. MyPlate. 2011.
http://www.choosemyplate.gov. Accessed June 12, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Nutrition Related Supplies
Caregiver intentionally or unintentionally not providing access to nutrition related supplies, eg, unmet
needs, abuse/neglect
Community and geographical constraints for shopping and transportation to obtain nutrition related
supplies
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning nutrition related supplies
Limited financial resources or limited access to financial resources to purchase nutrition related supplies
Reluctance to participate in community or other programs that provide access to nutrition related supplies
Physical or psychological limitations that diminish ability to shop, eg, walking, sight, mental/emotional
health
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data, Abnormal biochemical findings consistent with vitamin/mineral deficiency
Medical Tests and
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-3 1/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Nutrition Related Supplies
Procedures
Growth failure, based on reference growth standards, eg National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS)
Anthropometric Underweight: BMI <18.5 (adults)
Measurements Unintentional weight loss: adults, of > 10% in 6 months, > 5% in 1 month; any
unintentional weight loss in children
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
1. Holben DH. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food insecurity in the United States. J Am
Diet Assoc. 2010;110(9):1368-1377.
2. Nordin SM, Boyle, Kemmer TM. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition security
in developing nations: Sustainable food, water, and health. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(4):581-595.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-3 2/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Nutrition Related Supplies
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.09 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-3 3/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Potable Water
Caregiver intentionally or unintentionally not providing access to water, eg, unmet needs for food or
eating assistance, abuse/neglect
Community and geographical constraints for shopping and transportation
Food and nutrition-related knowledge deficit concerning of safe drinking water
Limited financial resources or limited access to financial resources to purchase a sufficient quantity of
water
Schools lacking nutrition/wellness policies or application of policies ensuring convenient, appetizing,
competitively priced culturally appropriate healthful foods at meals, snacks, and school-sponsored
activities.
Physical or psychological limitations that diminish ability to shop, eg, walking, sight, mental/emotional
health
Factors contributing to a contaminated water supply
Factors contributing to insufficient water access
Etiology Category
Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk factor. Communicate the etiology category by
selecting the appropriate Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation term:
Visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Category Identification reference sheet for more details on etiology
categories. An additional useful resource to determine the etiology category is the Nutrition Diagnosis Matrix.
Nutrition Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-4 1/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Potable Water
Assessment
Category
↓ Urine volume
Biochemical Data, Urine color reflecting concentration of urine
Medical Tests and ↑ Urine specific gravity
Procedures Abnormal stool study results
Malnutrition
Physical disability
Client History*** Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment that impacts water intake
Limited support systems
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
Arrows used with laboratory values: ↑ represents above reference standard and ↓ represents below reference
standard.
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
Progress Evaluation
Communicate the progress toward the resolution of a nutrition diagnosis by selecting the appropriate nutrition
diagnosis status value from the Nutrition Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation terms:
For details on these terms, visit the Nutrition Diagnosis Status reference sheet.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-4 2/3
12/15/21, 9:09 AM Limited Access to Potable Water
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
2. Position of the American Dietetic Association on food insecurity in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110:1368-1377.
3. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition security in developing nations: Sustainable
food, water, and health. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:581-595.
4. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food and water safety. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2014;114:1819-1829.
5. US Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010.
http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/dietaryguidelines.htm. Accessed June 15, 2015.
6. US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Information Service. MyPlate. 2011.
http://www.choosemyplate.gov. Accessed June 15, 2015.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.10 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNB-3-4 3/3
12/15/21, 10:36 AM No Nutrition Diagnosis At This Time
Other Domain
Note: This nutrition diagnostic term is not appropriate if additional information for the nutrition
assessment is needed or pending.
Not applicable
Nutrition
Assessment Potential Indicators of This Nutrition Diagnosis (one or more must be present)
Category
Biochemical Data,
Medical Tests and Not applicable
Procedures
Anthropometric
Not applicable
Measurements
Nutrition Focused
Not applicable
Physical Findings
Food/Nutrition-
Not applicable
Related History
Client History*** Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, e.g., palliative/end-of-life care
Assessment,
Monitoring and
Evaluation Tools
*** Client History terms are used for Nutrition Assessment, but not for Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation.
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNO-1-1 1/2
12/15/21, 10:36 AM No Nutrition Diagnosis At This Time
1. Swan WI, Pertel DG, Hotson B, et al. Nutrition care process (NCP) update part 2: Developing and
using the NCP terminology to demonstrate efficacy of nutrition care and related outcomes. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2019;119(5):840-855.
2. Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, et al. Nutrition care process and model update: Toward
realizing people-centered care and outcomes management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(12):2003-2014.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-133-218 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.08 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNO-1-1 2/2
Nutrition Diagnosis Etiology Matrix
Below are the etiology categories and their definitions. Etiologies are grouped by the type of cause or contributing risk
factor. In two specific instances, Access and Behavior etiologies, these alone may be the cause or contributing risk factor of
the nutrition diagnosis or the practitioner may determine a more specific root cause, eg, Belief-Attitudes of the problem.
Beliefs–Attitudes Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to the conviction of the truth of some
nutrition-related statement or phenomenon; feelings or emotions toward that truth or
phenomenon and activities.
Cultural Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to the client’s values, social norms,
customs, religious beliefs and/or political systems.
Knowledge Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors impacting the level of understanding about food,
nutrition and health, or nutrition-related information and guidelines.
Physical Function Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to physical ability to engage in specific
tasks, may be cognitive in nature.
Physiologic–Metabolic Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to medical/health status that may have a
nutritional impact (excludes psychological etiologies—see separate category).
Psychological Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to a diagnosed or suspected mental
health/psychological problem (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, DSM)
Social–Personal Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors associated with the client’s personal and/or social
history.
Treatment Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to medical or surgical treatment or other
therapies and management or care.
Access Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors that affect intake and the availability of safe,
healthful food, water, and food/nutrition-related supplies. A more specific root cause
of Access Etiologies may not be known but may eventually reveal
Beliefs-Attitudes, Cultural, Knowledge, Physical Function, Psychological, Social-
Personal, or Treatment Etiologies.
Behavior Etiologies Cause or contributing risk factors related to actions which influence achievement of
nutrition-related goals. A more specific root cause of Behavior Etiologies may not
be known but may eventually reveal Beliefs-Attitudes, Cultural, Knowledge,
Physical Function, Psychological, Social-Personal, or Treatment Etiologies.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
2
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
3
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
4
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
5
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
6
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
7
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
8
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
9
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
10
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
11
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
12
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
13
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
14
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
Underweight (NC-3.1)
Behavior Excessive physical activity
Excessive carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.2), Intake of types
Food and nutrition adherence
Behavior of carbohydrate inconsistent with needs (specify) (NI-
limitations
5.8.3), Inconsistent carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.4)
Food or activity behavior-related Poor nutrition quality of life (NB-2.5)
Behavior
difficulty
Food preparation or eating patterns Excessive fiber intake (NI-5.8.6)
that involve only high-fiber foods to
Behavior
the exclusion of other nutrient-dense
foods
Excessive physical activity (NB-2.2), Underweight (NC-
3.1), Overweight, adult or pediatric (NC-3.3.1), Obese,
pediatric (NC-3.3.2), Obese, Class I (NC-3.3.3), Obese,
Class II (NC-3.3.4), Obese, Class III (NC-3.3.5), Mild non
illness related pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) (NC-
Behavior Disordered eating pattern
4.1.4.1), Moderate non illness related pediatric
malnutrition (undernutrition) (NC-4.1.4.2), Severe non
illness related pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) (NC-
4.1.4.3), Mild illness related pediatric malnutrition
(undernutrition) (NC-4.1.5.), Moderate illness related
15
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Category Etiology Diagnosis
16
Supplemental material for the electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT). Copyright 2019 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
Each term is designated with an alpha-numeric NCPT hierarchical code, followed by a five-digit (eg, 99999) Academy SNOMED CT/LOINC unique identifier
(ANDUID). Neither should be used in nutrition documentation. The ANDUID is for data tracking purposes in electronic health records.
and others to set goals, writing of the nutrition prescription, and ❑ Decreased gluten diet ND-1.2.3.5 11000
reviewing of evidence based practice guides and policies to select ❑ Gluten free diet ND-1.2.3.5.1 11027
intervention strategies consistent with current scientific evidence. ❑ Amino acid modified diet ND-1.2.3.6 10897
Identify Nutrition Intervention Goal(s) (CG) ❑ Arginine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.1 10898
Description of a desired outcome of a nutrition intervention. ❑ Increased arginine diet ND-1.2.3.6.1.1 10974
❑ Identify goal description CG-1.1 14502 ❑ Decreased arginine diet ND-1.2.3.6.1.2 10975
❑ Identify goal target value CG-1.2 14503 ❑ Glutamine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.2 10899
❑ Identify goal timeframe CG-1.3 14504 ❑ Increased glutamine diet ND-1.2.3.6.2.1 10976
❑ Identify goal subject CG-1.4 14505 ❑ Decreased glutamine diet ND-1.2.3.6.2.2 10977
❑ Identify goal setter CG-1.5 14506 ❑ Histidine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.3 10900
❑ Increased histidine diet ND-1.2.3.6.3.1 10978
Nutrition Prescription (NP)
❑ Decreased histidine diet ND-1.2.3.6.3.2 10979
The client’s tailored recommended intake of energy and/or selected foods or nutrients
based on current reference standards and evidenced based practice nutrition guidelines ❑ Increased homocysteine diet ND-1.2.3.6.4 10980
and related to the client’s health and nutrition diagnosis (specify).
❑ Isoleucine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.5 10902
❑ Nutrition Prescription NP-1.1 10794
❑ Increased isoleucine diet ND-1.2.3.6.5.1 10981
❑ Decreased isoleucine diet ND-1.2.3.6.5.2 10982
NUTRITION INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION ❑ Leucine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.6 10903
The action phase of the nutrition intervention including carrying out ❑ Increased leucine diet ND-1.2.3.6.6.1 10983
and communicating the plan, continuing data collection, and revising ❑ Decreased leucine diet ND-1.2.3.6.6.2 10984
the nutrition intervention(s) based on the client response. ❑ Lysine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.7 10904
FOOD AND/OR NUTRIENT DELIVERY (ND) ❑ Increased lysine diet ND-1.2.3.6.7.1 10985
Individualized approach for food /nutrient provision. ❑ Decreased lysine diet ND-1.2.3.6.7.2 10986
Meals and Snacks (1) ❑ Methionine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.8 10905
Regular eating episode (meal); food served between regular meals (snack) ❑ Increased methionine diet ND-1.2.3.6.8.1 10987
❑ General healthful diet ND-1.1 10489 ❑ Decreased methionine diet ND-1.2.3.6.8.2 10988
❑ Modify composition of meals/snacks ND-1.2 10828 ❑ Phenylalanine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.9 10906
❑ Texture modified diet (1) ND-1.2.1 10829 ❑ Increased phenylalanine diet ND-1.2.3.6.9.1 11971
❑ Easy to chew diet ND-1.2.1.1 10914 ❑ Decreased phenylalanine diet ND-1.2.3.6.9.2 10989
❑ Mechanically altered diet ND-1.2.1.2 10915 ❑ Threonine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.10 10907
❑ Pureed diet ND-1.2.1.3 10916 ❑ Increased threonine diet ND-1.2.3.6.10.1 10990
❑ Liquid consistency thin liquids ND-1.2.1.4 10865 ❑ Decreased threonine diet ND-1.2.3.6.10.2 10991
❑ Liquid consistency nectar thick liquids ND-1.2.1.5 10866 ❑ Tryptophan modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.11 10908
❑ Liquid consistency honey thick liquids ND-1.2.1.6 10867 ❑ Increased tryptophan diet ND-1.2.3.6.11.1 10992
❑ Liquid consistency spoon thick liquids ND-1.2.1.7 10868 ❑ Decreased tryptophan diet ND-1.2.3.6.11.2 10993
❑ Soft bite sized food Level six Blue ND-1.2.1.8 12216 ❑ Decreased tyramine diet ND-1.2.3.6.12 10994
❑ Minced moist food Level five Orange ND-1.2.1.9 12217 ❑ Tyrosine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.13 10910
❑ Pureed food Level four Green ND-1.2.1.10 12218 ❑ Increased tyrosine diet ND-1.2.3.6.13.1 10995
❑ Extremely thick liquid Level four Green ND-1.2.1.11 12219 ❑ Decreased tyrosine diet ND-1.2.3.6.13.2 10996
❑ Liquidized food Level three Yellow ND-1.2.1.12 12220 ❑ Valine modified diet ND-1.2.3.6.14 10911
❑ Moderately thick liquid Level three ND-1.2.1.13 12221 ❑ Increased valine diet ND-1.2.3.6.14.1 10997
Yellow ❑ Decreased valine diet ND-1.2.3.6.14.2 10998
❑ Mildly thick liquid Level two Pink ND-1.2.1.14 12222 ❑ Carbohydrate modified diet (4) ND-1.2.4 10832
❑ Slightly thick liquid Level one Grey ND-1.2.1.15 12223 ❑ Consistent carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.1 10860
❑ Energy modified diet (2) ND-1.2.2 10830 ❑ Increased carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.2 10930
❑ Increased energy diet ND-1.2.2.1 10935 ❑ Increased complex carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.2.1 11972
❑ Decreased energy diet ND-1.2.2.2 10936 ❑ Increased simple carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.2.2 11973
❑ Protein modified diet (3) ND-1.2.3 10831 ❑ Decreased carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.3 10931
❑ Consistent protein diet ND-1.2.3.1 10896 ❑ Decreased complex carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.3.1 11974
1
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Decreased simple carbohydrate diet ND-1.2.4.3.2 11975 ❑ Increased fluid diet ND-1.2.8.1 10874
❑ Galactose modified diet ND-1.2.4.4 10861 ❑ Fluid restricted diet ND-1.2.8.2 10873
❑ Increased galactose diet ND-1.2.4.4.1 11976 ❑ Clear liquid diet ND-1.2.8.3 10876
❑ Decreased galactose diet ND-1.2.4.4.2 10932 ❑ Full liquid diet ND-1.2.8.4 10877
❑ Lactose modified diet ND-1.2.4.5 10862 ❑ Diets modified for specific foods or ND-1.2.9 10836
ingredients (9)
❑ Increased lactose diet ND-1.2.4.5.1 11977
❑ Vitamin modified diet (10) ND-1.2.10 10837
❑ Decreased lactose diet ND-1.2.4.5.2 10933
❑ Vitamin A modified diet ND-1.2.10.1 10923
❑ Fructose modified diet ND-1.2.4.6 11978
❑ Increased vitamin A diet ND-1.2.10.1.1 11013
❑ Increased fructose diet ND-1.2.4.6.1 11979
❑ Decreased vitamin A diet ND-1.2.10.1.2 11014
❑ Decreased fructose diet ND-1.2.4.6.2 11980
❑ Vitamin C modified diet ND-1.2.10.2 10926
❑ Fat modified diet (5) ND-1.2.5 10833
❑ Increased vitamin C diet ND-1.2.10.2.1 11019
❑ Increased fat diet ND-1.2.5.1 10937
❑ Decreased vitamin C diet ND-1.2.10.2.2 11020
❑ Decreased fat diet ND-1.2.5.2 10938
❑ Vitamin D modified diet ND-1.2.10.3 10927
❑ Monounsaturated fat modified diet ND-1.2.5.3 10869
❑ Increased vitamin D diet ND-1.2.10.3.1 11021
❑ Increased monounsaturated fat diet ND-1.2.5.3.1 10939
❑ Decreased vitamin D diet ND-1.2.10.3.2 11022
❑ Decreased monounsaturated fat diet ND-1.2.5.3.2 10940
❑ Vitamin E modified diet ND-1.2.10.4 10928
❑ Polyunsaturated fat modified diet ND-1.2.5.4 10870
❑ Increased vitamin E diet ND-1.2.10.4.1 11023
❑ Increased polyunsaturated fat diet ND-1.2.5.4.1 10941
❑ Decreased vitamin E diet ND-1.2.10.4.2 11024
❑ Increased linoleic acid diet ND-1.2.5.4.1.1 11981
❑ Vitamin K modified diet ND-1.2.10.5 10929
❑ Decreased polyunsaturated fat diet ND-1.2.5.4.2 10942
❑ Increased vitamin K diet ND-1.2.10.5.1 11025
❑ Decreased linoleic acid diet ND-1.2.5.4.2.1 11982
❑ Decreased vitamin K diet ND-1.2.10.5.2 11026
❑ Saturated fat modified diet ND-1.2.5.5 10871
❑ Thiamine modified diet ND-1.2.10.6 10922
❑ Decreased saturated fat diet ND-1.2.5.5.1 10943
❑ Increased thiamine diet ND-1.2.10.6.1 11011
❑ Trans fat modified diet ND-1.2.5.6 10872
❑ Decreased thiamine diet ND-1.2.10.6.2 11012
❑ Decreased trans fat modified diet ND-1.2.5.6.1 10944
❑ Riboflavin modified diet ND-1.2.10.7 10921
❑ Omega 3 fatty acid modified diet ND-1.2.5.7 11983
❑ Increased riboflavin diet ND-1.2.10.7.1 11009
❑ Increased omega 3 fatty acid diet ND-1.2.5.7.1 11984
❑ Decreased riboflavin diet ND-1.2.10.7.2 11010
❑ Increased alpha linolenic acid diet ND-1.2.5.7.1.1 11985
❑ Niacin modified diet ND-1.2.10.8 10919
❑ Increased eicosapentaenoic acid ND-1.2.5.7.1.2 11986
diet ❑ Increased niacin diet ND-1.2.10.8.1 11005
❑ Increased docosahexaenoic acid ND-1.2.5.7.1.3 11987 ❑ Decreased niacin diet ND-1.2.10.8.2 11006
❑ Decreased omega 3 fatty acid diet ND-1.2.5.7.2 11988 ❑ Folic acid modified diet ND-1.2.10.9 10918
❑ Decreased alpha linolenic acid diet ND-1.2.5.7.2.1 11989 ❑ Increased folic acid diet ND-1.2.10.9.1 11003
❑ Decreased eicosapentaenoic acid ND-1.2.5.7.2.2 11990 ❑ Decreased folic acid diet ND-1.2.10.9.2 11004
diet
❑ Vitamin B6 modified diet ND-1.2.10.10 10924
❑ Decreased docosahexaenoic acid ND-1.2.5.7.2.3 11991
❑ Increased vitamin B6 diet ND-1.2.10.10.1 11015
diet
❑ Decreased vitamin B6 diet ND-1.2.10.10.2 11016
❑ Medium chain triglyceride modified diet ND-1.2.5.8 11992
❑ Vitamin B12 modified diet ND-1.2.10.11 10925
❑ Increased medium chain triglyceride ND-1.2.5.8.1 11993
diet ❑ Increased vitamin B12 diet ND-1.2.10.11.1 11017
❑ Decreased medium chain triglyceride ND-1.2.5.8.2 11994 ❑ Decreased vitamin B12 diet ND-1.2.10.11.2 11018
diet
❑ Pantothenic acid modified diet ND-1.2.10.12 10920
❑ Cholesterol modified diet (6) ND-1.2.6 10863
❑ Increased pantothenic acid diet ND-1.2.10.12.1 11007
❑ Decreased cholesterol diet ND-1.2.6.1 10934
❑ Decreased pantothenic acid diet ND-1.2.10.12.2 11008
❑ Fiber modified diet (7) ND-1.2.7 10834
❑ Biotin modified diet ND-1.2.10.13 10917
❑ Increased fiber diet ND-1.2.7.1 10945
❑ Increased biotin diet ND-1.2.10.13.1 11001
❑ Decreased fiber diet ND-1.2.7.2 10946
❑ Decreased biotin diet ND-1.2.10.13.2 11002
❑ Soluble fiber modified diet ND-1.2.7.3 10947
❑ Mineral modified diet (11) ND-1.2.11 10838
❑ Increased soluble fiber diet ND-1.2.7.3.1 10948
❑ Calcium modified diet ND-1.2.11.1 10879
❑ Decreased soluble fiber diet ND-1.2.7.3.2 10949
❑ Increased calcium diet ND-1.2.11.1.1 10953
❑ Insoluble fiber modified diet ND-1.2.7.4 10950
❑ Decreased calcium diet ND-1.2.11.1.2 10954
❑ Increased insoluble fiber diet ND-1.2.7.4.1 10951
❑ Chloride modified diet ND-1.2.11.2 10880
❑ Decreased insoluble fiber diet ND-1.2.7.4.2 10952
❑ Iron modified diet ND-1.2.11.3 10886
❑ Fluid modified diet (8) ND-1.2.8 10835
❑ Increased iron diet ND-1.2.11.3.1 10960
2
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Decreased iron diet ND-1.2.11.3.2 10961 ❑ Modify concentration of enteral nutrition ND-2.1.2 10502
❑ Magnesium modified diet ND-1.2.11.4 10887 ❑ Modify rate of enteral nutrition ND-2.1.3 10500
❑ Increased magnesium diet ND-1.2.11.4.1 10962 ❑ Modify volume of enteral nutrition ND-2.1.4 10501
❑ Decreased magnesium diet ND-1.2.11.4.2 10963 ❑ Modify schedule of enteral nutrition ND-2.1.5 10504
❑ Potassium modified diet ND-1.2.11.5 10891 ❑ Modify route of enteral nutrition ND-2.1.6 10792
❑ Increased potassium diet ND-1.2.11.5.1 10966 ❑ Insert enteral feeding tube ND-2.1.7 10497
❑ Decreased potassium diet ND-1.2.11.5.2 10967 ❑ Enteral nutrition site care ND-2.1.8 10498
❑ Phosphorus modified diet ND-1.2.11.6 10890 ❑ Feeding tube flush ND-2.1.9 10499
❑ Increased phosphorus diet ND-1.2.11.6.1 10964 Parenteral Nutrition/IV Fluids (2.2)
❑ Decreased phosphorus diet ND-1.2.11.6.2 10965 Nutrition and fluids provided intravenously
❑ Sodium modified diet ND-1.2.11.7 10893 ❑ Modify composition of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.1 10511
❑ Increased sodium diet ND-1.2.11.7.1 10968 ❑ Modify concentration of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.2 10510
❑ Decreased sodium diet ND-1.2.11.7.2 10969 ❑ Modify rate of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.3 10509
❑ Zinc modified diet ND-1.2.11.8 10895 ❑ Modify volume of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.4 11141
❑ Increased zinc diet ND-1.2.11.8.1 10970 ❑ Modify schedule of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.5 10512
❑ Decreased zinc diet ND-1.2.11.8.2 10971 ❑ Modify route of parenteral nutrition ND-2.2.6 10793
❑ Sulfur modified diet ND-1.2.11.9 10894 ❑ Parenteral nutrition site care ND-2.2.7 10507
❑ Fluoride modified diet ND-1.2.11.10 10884 ❑ IV fluid delivery ND-2.2.8 10508
❑ Copper modified diet ND-1.2.11.11 10883 Nutrition Supplement Therapy (3)
❑ Increased copper diet ND-1.2.11.11.1 10956 Foods or nutrients that are not intended as a sole (only) item or a meal or diet, but that
❑ Decreased copper diet ND-1.2.11.11.2 10957 are intended to provide additional nutrients
❑ Iodine modified diet ND-1.2.11.12 10885 Medical Food Supplement Therapy (3.1)
❑ Increased iodine diet ND-1.2.11.12.1 10958 Commercial or prepared foods or beverages intended to supplement energy, protein,
carbohydrate, fiber, and/or fat intake
❑ Decreased iodine diet ND-1.2.11.12.2 10959
❑ Commercial beverage medical food ND-3.1.1 10515
❑ Selenium modified diet ND-1.2.11.13 10892 supplement therapy
❑ Manganese modified diet ND-1.2.11.14 10888 ❑ Commercial food medical food supplement ND-3.1.2 10516
❑ Chromium modified diet ND-1.2.11.15 10881 therapy
❑ Increased chromium diet ND-1.2.11.15.1 10955 ❑ Modified beverage medical food supplement ND-3.1.3 10517
therapy
❑ Molybdenum modified diet ND-1.2.11.16 10889
❑ Modified food medical food supplement ND-3.1.4 10518
❑ Boron modified diet ND-1.2.11.17 10878 therapy
❑ Cobalt modified diet ND-1.2.11.18 10882 ❑ Purpose of medical food supplement therapy ND-3.1.5 10519
❑ Modify schedule of food/fluids ND-1.3 10815 Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Therapy (3.2)
❑ Modify schedule of intake to limit fasting ND-1.3.1 11995 Supplemental vitamins or minerals
❑ Specific foods/beverages or groups ND-1.4 10492
❑ Multivitamin mineral supplement therapy ND-3.2.1 10521
❑ Fruit modified diet ND-1.4.1 11996 ❑ Multitrace element supplement therapy ND-3.2.2 10522
❑ Vegetable modified diet ND-1.4.2 11997
❑ Vitamin supplement therapy ND-3.2.3 10523
❑ Starchy vegetable modified diet ND-1.4.2.1 11998 ❑ A (1) 10524
❑ Bean and pea modified diet ND-1.4.2.2 11999
❑ C (2) 10525
❑ Grain modified diet ND-1.4.3 12000 ❑ D (3) 10526
❑ Diet modified for uncooked food starch ND-1.4.3.1 12001
❑ E (4) 10527
❑ Protein food modified diet ND-1.4.4 12002 ❑ K (5) 10528
❑ Diet with foods modified to be low in ND-1.4.4.1 12003
❑ Thiamin (6) 10529
protein
❑ Riboflavin (7) 10530
❑ Diet modified for egg ND-1.4.4.2 12004
❑ Niacin (8) 10531
❑ Raw egg free diet ND-1.4.4.2.1 12005
❑ Folate (9) 10532
❑ Other ND-1.5 10493
❑ B6 (10) 10533
(specify) ______________________________
❑ B12 (11) 10534
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (2)
❑ Pantothenic acid (12) 10535
Nutrition provided through the GI tract via tube, catheter, or stoma (enteral) or
intravenously, centrally or peripherally (parenteral) ❑ Biotin (13) 10536
3
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
❑ Phosphorus (6) 10544 Actions to manage breastfeeding and/or infant formula feeding
❑ Sulfate (9) 10547 ❑ Modify human milk fortifier additive in ND-7.1.1.1 14145
breastmilk
❑ Fluoride (10) 10548
❑ Modify carbohydrate additive in ND-7.1.1.2 14146
❑ Copper (11) 10549 breastmilk
❑ Iodine (12) 10550 ❑ Modify fat additive in breastmilk ND-7.1.1.3 14147
❑ Selenium (13) 10551 ❑ Modify protein additive in breastmilk ND-7.1.1.4 14148
❑ Manganese (14) 10552 ❑ Modify fiber additive in breastmilk ND-7.1.1.5 14149
❑ Chromium (15) 10553 ❑ Modify added infant formula in ND-7.1.1.6 14150
breastmilk
❑ Molybdenum (16) 10554
❑ Modify breastfeeding attempts ND-7.1.2 14151
❑ Boron (17) 10555
❑ Modify volume of breastmilk ND-7.1.3 14152
❑ Cobalt (18) 10556
❑ Evaluation of breastfeeding plan ND-7.1.4 14153
Bioactive Substance Management (3.3)
❑ Evaluation of breastfeeding ND-7.1.5 14154
Addition or change in provision of bioactive substances
❑ Evaluation of breastfeeding behavior ND-7.1.6 14155
❑ Plant stanol esters management ND-3.3.1 10559
❑ Promotion of exclusive breastfeeding ND-7.1.7 14156
❑ Plant sterol esters management ND-3.3.2 10816
❑ Promotion of predominant breastfeeding ND-7.1.8 14157
❑ Soy protein management ND-3.3.3 10561
❑ Promotion of partial breastfeeding ND-7.1.9 14158
❑ Psyllium management ND-3.3.4 10817
❑ Infant formula modification ND-7.2 14159
❑ Beta glucan management ND-3.3.5 10563
❑ Modify composition of infant formula ND-7.2.1 14160
❑ Food additives management ND-3.3.6 10564
❑ Modify concentration of infant formula ND-7.2.2 14161
❑ Alcohol management ND-3.3.7 10565
❑ Modify human milk fortifier additive in ND-7.2.2.1 14162
❑ Caffeine management ND-3.3.8 10566 infant formula
Feeding Assistance Management (4) ❑ Modify carbohydrate additive in infant ND-7.2.2.2 14163
Accommodation or assistance in eating formula
❑ Adaptive eating device management ND-4.1 10808 ❑ Modify fat additive in infant formula ND-7.2.2.3 14164
❑ Feeding position management ND-4.2 10570 ❑ Modify protein additive in infant formula ND-7.2.2.4 14165
❑ Meal set up management ND-4.3 10571 ❑ Modify fiber additive in infant formula ND-7.2.2.5 14166
❑ Mouth care management ND-4.4 10572 ❑ Modify infant formula feeding attempts ND-7.2.3 14167
❑ Menu selection assistance ND-4.5 10809 ❑ Modify volume of infant formula ND-7.2.4 14168
Manage Feeding Environment (5) ❑ Evaluation of infant formula feeding plan ND-7.2.5 14169
Adjustment of the factors where food is served that impact food consumption ❑ Evaluation of infant formula feeding ND-7.2.6 14170
❑ Evaluation of infant formula feeding behavior ND-7.2.7 14171
❑ Feeding environment lighting management ND-5.1 10575
❑ Feeding environment odor management ND-5.2 10576
❑ Feeding environment distraction management ND-5.3 10577 NUTRITION EDUCATION (E)
❑ Feeding environment table height management ND-5.4 10578 Formal process to instruct or train clients in a skill or to impart knowledge to help clients
voluntarily manage or modify food, nutrition and physical activity choices and behavior to
❑ Feeding environment table service ND-5.5 10849 maintain or improve health
management
Nutrition Education Content (1)
❑ Feeding environment room temperature ND-5.6 10580
management Instruction or training intended to lead to nutrition related knowledge
❑ Feeding environment meal service ND-5.7 10810 ❑ Content related nutrition education E-1.1 13223
management ❑ Education on nutrition's influence on health E-1.2 10591
❑ Feeding environment meal location ND-5.8 10811 ❑ Physical activity guidance E-1.3 12012
management
Nutrition Education Application (2)
Nutrition Related Medication Management (6)
Instruction or training leading to nutrition related result interpretation or skills
Modification of a medication or complementary/alternative medicine to optimize client
nutritional or health status ❑ Nutrition related laboratory result interpretation E-2.1 10596
education
❑ Management of nutrition related prescription ND-6.1 10839
medication ❑ Nutrition related skill education E-2.2 10597
❑ Management of nutrition related over the ND-6.2 10584 ❑ Technical nutrition education E-2.3 13222
counter (OTC) medication
4
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
NCPT Code ANDUID NCPT Code ANDUID
NUTRITION COUNSELING (C) Discharge planning and transfer of nutrition care from one level or location of care to
another.
A supportive process characterized by a collaborative counselor–client relationship to
establish food, nutrition, and physical activity priorities, goals, and individualized action ❑ Discharge and transfer of nutrition care to other RC-2.1 10813
plans that acknowledge and foster responsibility for self-care to treat an existing condition providers
and promote health ❑ Discharge and transfer of nutrition care to RC-2.2 10814
Theoretical Basis/Approach (1) community agencies and programs
The theories or models used to design and implement an intervention ❑ Discharge and transfer of nutrition care from RC-2.3 10627
nutrition professional to another nutrition
❑ Nutrition counseling based on cognitive C-1.1 10601 professional
behavioral theory approach
❑ Nutrition counseling based on health belief C-1.2 10602
model POPULATION BASED NUTRITION ACTION (P)
❑ Nutrition counseling based on social learning C-1.3 10603 Interventions designed to improve the nutritional well-being of a population
theory approach
Population Theoretical Frameworks (1)
❑ Nutrition counseling based on transtheoretical C-1.4 10604
Theories, models, and approaches used to design, implement, and evaluate nutrition
model stages of change approach
interventions at the population level
❑ Other C-1.5 10605
❑ Social ecological model P-1.1 12154
Strategies (2) ❑ Community organizing P-1.2 12155
Selectively applied evidence-based methods or plans of action designed to achieve a ❑ Diffusion of innovations P-1.3 12156
particular goal
❑ Social marketing P-1.4 12157
❑ Nutrition counseling based on motivational C-2.1 10607
interviewing strategy ❑ Organizational change theory P-1.5 12158
❑ Nutrition counseling based on goal setting C-2.2 10608 ❑ Mass communications P-1.6 12159
strategy
❑ Political action P-1.7 12160
❑ Nutrition counseling based on self monitoring C-2.3 10609
strategy
Population Strategies (2)
❑ Nutrition counseling based on problem solving C-2.4 10610 Plans of action that target environmental change, organizational change, and public
strategy policy change
❑ Nutrition counseling based on social support C-2.5 10611 ❑ Environmental change P-2.1 12162
strategy ❑ Food environment change P-2.1.1 12163
❑ Nutrition counseling based on stress C-2.6 10612 ❑ Built environment change P-2.1.2 12164
management strategy
❑ Social norm change P-2.1.3 12165
❑ Nutrition counseling based on stimulus control C-2.7 10613
strategy ❑ Organizational change P-2.2 12166
❑ Nutrition counseling based on cognitive C-2.8 10614 ❑ Public policy change P-2.3 12167
restructuring strategy Population Settings (3)
❑ Nutrition counseling based on relapse C-2.9 10615 Locations where the population based nutrition intervention is implemented
prevention strategy
❑ Residential settings P-3.1 12169
❑ Nutrition counseling based on rewards and C-2.10 10616
contingency management strategy ❑ School settings P-3.2 12170
❑ Other C-2.11 10617 ❑ Worksite settings P-3.3 12171
❑ Recreation and sports settings P-3.4 12172
COORDINATION OF NUTRITION CARE BY A NUTRITION ❑ Food production and provision settings P-3.5 12173
PROFESSIONAL (RC) ❑ Service settings P-3.6 12174
Consultation with, referral to, or coordination of nutrition care with other providers, ❑ Government settings P-3.7 12175
institutions, or agencies that can assist in treating or managing nutrition-related problems
❑ Community at large settings P-3.8 12176
Collaboration and Referral of Nutrition Care (1)
Population Sectors (4)
Facilitating services with other professionals, institutions, or agencies during nutrition
care Public, private, and nonprofit entities integral to the development and implementation of
interventions that impact determinants of the nutritional well-being of the population
❑ Team meeting involving nutrition professional RC-1.1 10620
❑ Agriculture sector P-4.1 12178
❑ Referral by nutrition professional to another RC-1.2 10621
nutrition professional with different expertise ❑ Education sector P-4.2 12179
❑ Collaboration by nutrition professional with RC-1.3 10622 ❑ Government sector P-4.3 12180
other nutrition professionals ❑ Healthcare sector P-4.4 12181
❑ Collaboration by nutrition professional with RC-1.4 10812 ❑ Food and beverage sector P-4.5 12182
other providers
❑ Business and industry sector P-4.6 12183
❑ Referral by nutrition professional to other RC-1.5 10624
providers ❑ Social welfare sector P-4.7 12184
5
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition Intervention Terminology
Each term is designated with an alpha-numeric NCPT hierarchical code, followed by a five-digit (eg, 99999) Academy SNOMED CT/LOINC unique identifier
(ANDUID). Neither should be used in nutrition documentation. The ANDUID is for data tracking purposes in electronic health records.
6
Nutrition Care Process Terminology (eNCPT), 2020 Edition. Copyright 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
12/15/21, 9:06 PM Identify Nutrition Intervention Goal(s)
Purpose
To communicate specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-based (SMART) nutrition goals described and
planned for implementation.
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details: Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Identify goal description (based upon nutrition assessment/monitoring and evaluation or nutrition
intervention terms)—defined as a summary statement of the desired outcome
Identify goal target value (based upon nutrition assessment/monitoring and evaluation or nutrition
intervention terms)—defined as an indicator from nutrition assessment/monitoring and evaluation and
nutrition intervention terms that provides evidence for the goal and desired outcome
Identify goal timeframe (duration)—defined as the duration of the intervention or date by which the goal
is anticipated to be met
Identify goal subject (individual client, supportive individual, supportive structure)—defined as the
individual client, supportive individual (eg, family, caregiver), or supportive structure (eg, social service
agencies and faith-based organizations) for whom the goal is planned
Identify goal setter (individual client, supportive individual, supportive structure, professional, mutually
established between individual client and professional)—defined as the party that identified the goal
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Inadequate energy intake (NI-1.2)
Inadequate oral intake (NI-2.1)
Excessive fat intake (NI-5.5.2)
Excessive carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.2)
Nutrition Diagnoses Inconsistent carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.4)
Growth rate below expected (NC-3.5)
Limited access to food (NB-3.2)
Underweight (NC-3.1)
Etiology Lack of access to healthful food choices, eg, current food access, food
provided by caregiver
Physiological causes, eg, increased energy needs due to increased activity
level, metabolic change, malabsorption, growth, extreme weakness,
critical illness
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCG-1-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:06 PM Identify Nutrition Intervention Goal(s)
Psychological causes
Neurological causes, eg difficulty chewing, swallowing”
Food and nutrition knowledge deficit regarding foods being consumed
Anthropometric Measurements
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Goal Examples
Goals are set using Nutrition Assessment/Monitoring and Evaluation or Nutrition Intervention terms; for
individuals and populations; and identified by clients, professionals, or mutually set, so examples are provided to
reflect these. The components of each goal are identified in brackets for information only and so that
professionals communicate structured and coded components for tracking in electronic health records or reports.
[Identify goal description] Increase estimated vegetable serving intake in 24 hours (FH-1.1.2.1.1.3): [Identify
goal setter] Client identified goal that [Identify goal subject] they will [Identify target value] eat two
vegetable servings with lunch on five of seven days per week [Identify goal timeframe] by next encounter in 3
weeks.
Population Example
[Identify goal description] Increase estimated vegetable serving intake in 24 hours (FH-1.1.2.1.1.3): [Identify
goal setter] Mutually established between individual client and professional that [Identify goal subject] client
will [Identify target value] increase vegetable servings to 4 per day with implementation of new community
supported agriculture incentive program [Identify goal timeframe] over the next 6 months.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCG-1-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:06 PM Identify Nutrition Intervention Goal(s)
Population Example
[Identify goal description] Content related nutrition education (E-1.1): [Identify goal setter] Professional
identified goal to provide [Identify goal subject] client with [Identify target value] content related education
messages on the importance of increasing vegetable servings intake during the implementation of new
community supported agriculture incentive program [Identify goal timeframe] over the next 6 months.
Note. Items in brackets [Identify goal description] or [Identify goal setter] are provided for education purposes
only to illustrate how components are coded in health records. These should not be included when
communicating goals.
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Terminology Reference Manual (eNCPT): Dietetics
Language for Nutrition Care. Nutrition Intervention Actions. https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-
en/page-050. Accessed February 14, 2020.
2. Aspry K, Dunsiger S, Breault C, Stabile L, DeAngelis J, Wu WC. Effect of case management with
goal-setting on diet scores and weight loss in cardiac rehabilitation patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev.
2018;38(6):380-387.Scores and Weight Loss in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil
Prev. 2018;38(6):380-387.
3. Benson GA, Sidebottom A, Hayes J, et al. Impact of ENHANCED (diEtitiaNs Helping pAtieNts
CarE for Diabetes) telemedicine randomized controlled trial on diabetes optimal care outcomes in
patients with type 2 diabetes. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(4):585-598.
4. Bowman J, Mogensen L, Marsland E, Lannin N. The development, content validity and inter-rater
reliability of the SMART-Goal Evaluation Method: A standardised method for evaluating clinical goals.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(6):420-427.
5. Fulkerson JA, Friend S, Horning M, et al. Family home food environment and nutrition-related
parent and child personal and behavioral outcomes of the healthy home offerings via the mealtime
environment (HOME) plus program: A randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(2):240-
251.
6. Horwath CC, Schembre SM, Motl RW, Dishman RK, Nigg CR. Does the transtheoretical model of
behavior change provide a useful basis for interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption? Am
J Health Promot. 2013;27(6):351-357.
7. HL7 FHIR Release 4. Resource Goal - Content. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/goal.html. Accessed March
2, 2020.
8. Spahn JM, Reeves RS, Keim KS, et al. State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and
strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110(6):879-891.
9. Swan WI, Vivanti A, Hakel-Smith NA, et al. Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: Toward
Realizing People-Centered Care and Outcomes Management. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(12):2003-2014.
10. Swan WI, Pertel DG, Hotson B, et al. Nutrition care process (NCP) update part 2: Developing and
using the NCP terminology to demonstrate efficacy of nutrition care and related outcomes. J Acad Nutr
Diet. 2019;119(5):840-855.
11. Tichelaar J, Uil den SH, Antonini NF, van Agtmael MA, de Vries TP, Richir MC. A 'SMART' way
to determine treatment goals in pharmacotherapy education. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(1):280-284.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.61 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeCG-1-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Nutrition Prescription
NUTRITION PRESCRIPTION
Nutrition Intervention
Purpose
To communicate the nutrition professional’s diet/nutrition recommendation based on a nutrition assessment.
Indicators
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNP-1-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Nutrition Prescription
frequency)
Vitamin E (specify form, mg or IU,
Vitamin B12 (µg, frequency)
frequency)
Vitamin K (µg, frequency) Pantothenic acid (mg, frequency)
Thiamin (mg, frequency) Biotin (µg, frequency)
Riboflavin (mg, frequency)
Multivitamin (yes/no, specify dose, frequency)
Recommended mineral intake
Calcium (specify form, mg, frequency) Molybdenum (µg, frequency)
Copper (µg or mg, frequency) Boron (mg, frequency)
Fluoride (mg, frequency) Cobalt (µg, frequency)
Iodine (µg, frequency) Selenium (specify form, µg, frequency)
Iron (specify form, mg, frequency) Zinc (mg, frequency)
Potassium (specify form, g or mg,
Magnesium (mg, frequency)
frequency)
Phosphorus (mg, frequency) Sodium (mg or g, frequency)
Sulfate (g or mmol, frequency) Chloride (mg, frequency)
Manganese (mg, frequency) Chromium (specify form, µg, frequency)
Multi-mineral (yes/no, specify dose,
frequency)
Multi-trace element (yes/no, specify dose,
frequency)
Recommended enteral nutrition order (specify, eg, formula, rate/schedule)
Tube feeding modulars (specify, eg, carbohydrate, protein, fat, fiber)
Recommended parenteral nutrition order (specify, eg, solution, rate, access)
Recommended level of bioactive substances (specify, eg, substance, amount)
Recommended food intake
Grain group intake (specify, eg, servings, exchanges, amounts)
Fruit and vegetable intake (specify, eg, servings, exchanges, amounts)
Meat, poultry, fish, eggs, beans, nut intake (specify, eg, servings, exchanges, amounts)
Milk and milk product intake (specify, eg, servings, exchanges, amounts)
Fat intake (specify, eg, type, servings, exchanges, amounts)
Note: The nutrition prescription can be used as a comparative standard for nutrition assessment and
nutrition monitoring and evaluation.
References
The following are some suggested references; other references may be appropriate.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNP-1-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Nutrition Prescription
7. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin,
Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press; 1998.
8. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K,
Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium,
and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
9. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Vitamin C, Vitamin E,
Selenium, and Carotenoids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
10. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium,
Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
11. National Academies of Science Engineering Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and
Potassium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2019.
12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 13, 2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeNP-1-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Meals and Snacks
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
* Used with permission from the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI.org).
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-1 1/7
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Meals and Snacks
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Increased energy expenditure (NI-1.1)
Inadequate energy intake (NI-1.2)
Inadequate oral intake (NI-2.1)
Excessive fat intake (NI-5.5.2)
Excessive carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.2)
Nutrition Diagnoses Inconsistent carbohydrate intake (NI-5.8.4)
Biting/chewing (masticatory) difficulty (NC-1.2)
Growth rate below expected (NC-3.5)
Limited access to food (NB 3.2)
Underweight (NC 3.1)
Etiology Lack of access to healthful food choices, eg, current food access, food
provided by caregiver
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-1 5/7
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Meals and Snacks
Anthropometric Measurements
Weight change
Dental caries
Diarrhea
Evidence of muscle and/or fat wasting
Hunger
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Signs and Symptoms
Cultural or religious practices that do not support modified food/nutrition
intake
Changes in physical activity
Intake of less than optimal foods
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit concerning appropriate
amount or timing of carbohydrate intake
Client History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-1 6/7
12/15/21, 9:07 PM Meals and Snacks
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-1 7/7
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Enteral Nutrition
ENTERAL NUTRITION
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Modify composition of enteral nutrition (eg, formula name or description, special additives including
supplemental fat, carbohydrate, or protein, fiber)
Modify concentration of enteral nutrition (eg, calories/kcal/kJ per mL)
Modify rate of enteral nutrition (eg, mL/hour)
Modify volume of enteral nutrition (eg, mL/day, mL/feeding)
Modify schedule of enteral nutrition (eg, number of hours per 24 hours, continuous, intermittent, bolus)
Modify route of enteral nutrition (eg, nasoentric, oroenteric, percutaneous, or surgical access with gastric,
duodenal or jejunal placement)
Insert enteral feeding tube
Enteral nutrition site care (eg, change dressings and provide enteral feeding tube site care)
Feeding tube flush (eg, type, volume mL/flush, frequency)
Note: Related nutrition interventions, eg, checking gastric residual volume or elevating the head of the
bed are documented using Coordination of Nutrition Care
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Swallowing difficulty (NC-1.1)
Altered GI function (NC-1.4)
Inadequate oral intake (NI-2.1)
Nutrition Diagnoses Increased nutrient needs (NI-5.1)
Inadequate protein energy intake (NI-5.2)
Inadequate protein intake (NI-5.6.1)
Inadequate enteral nutrition infusion (NI-2.3)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-2-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Enteral Nutrition
Weight loss
Growth failure
Insufficient maternal weight gain
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Aspiration
Coma
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159-
211.
2. Mehta NM, Skillman HE, Irving SY, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(5):706-742.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-2-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Parenteral Nutrition/IV Fluids
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details: Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Altered GI function (NC-1.4)
Nutrition Diagnoses Inadequate parenteral nutrition infusion (NI-2.7)
Impaired nutrient utilization (NC-2.1)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-2-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Parenteral Nutrition/IV Fluids
Vomiting
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Malabsorption, maldigestion
Emesis
Diffuse peritonitis, intestinal obstruction, paralytic ileus, gastrointestinal
ischemia, or perforated viscus, short-bowel syndrome
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
End-of-life issues, ethical considerations, client rights and supportive individual issues
Other nutrient intake (oral, enteral nutrition)
Parenteral formulary composition and product availability
Availability/access to a qualified practitioner for follow-up and monitoring
Economic constraints that limit availability of parenteral products
References
1. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159-
211.
2. Mehta NM, Skillman HE, Irving SY, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition
support therapy in the pediatric critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(5):706-742.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-2-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Medical Food Supplement Therapy
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details: Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Delayed growth
Unintended weight loss
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-3-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Medical Food Supplement Therapy
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-3-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:09 PM Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Therapy
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details: Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Emerging scientific evidence to support the use of vitamin and mineral supplements in specific
populations, medical conditions and/or medical treatments
Availability of a qualified practitioner with additional education/training in the use of vitamin and mineral
supplements in practice
Economic considerations and product availability
References
1. Marra MV, Bailey RL. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Micronutrient
supplementation. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(11):2162-2173.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-3-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:10 PM Bioactive Substance Management
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Inadequate bioactive substance intake (NI-4.1)
Excessive bioactive substance intake (NI-4.2)
Excessive alcohol intake (NI-4.3)
Nutrition Diagnoses
Predicted food–medication interaction (NC-2.4)
Food and nutrition related knowledge deficit (NB-1.1)
Undesirable food choices (NB-1.7)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-3-3 1/2
12/15/21, 9:10 PM Bioactive Substance Management
Client History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Emerging scientific evidence to support the use of bioactive supplements in specific populations, specific
medical conditions and/or with medical treatments
Availability of a qualified practitioner with additional education/training in the use of bioactive
supplements in practice
References
1. Crowe KM. Frances C. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Functional foods. J Acad
Nutr Diet. 2013;113(8):1096-1103.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-3-3 2/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Feeding Assistance Management
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Physical disability
Poor food/nutrient intake
Etiology Neurological issues, eg, decreased memory, concentration
problems
Anthropometric Measurements
Weight loss
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Signs and Symptoms
Conditions associated with a diagnosis or treatment, eg,
cerebral palsy, stroke, dementia
History of aspiration or conditions which increase risk of
aspiration
Refusal to use prescribed adaptive eating devices, or follow
prescribed positioning techniques
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-4 1/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Feeding Assistance Management
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Unintended weight loss in older adults evidence-based nutrition
practice guideline. https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?menu=5294. Accessed February 25, 2019.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Critical illness evidence-based nutrition
guideline. http://andevidencelibrary.com/topic.cfm?cat=4800. Accessed February 25, 2019..
3. Dorner B, Friedrich EK. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Individualized nutrition
approaches for older adults: Long-term care, post-acute care, and other settings. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2018;118(4):724-735.
4. Partnership for Health in Aging. Position statement on interdisciplinary team training in geriatrics: An
essential component of quality healthcare for older adults.
https://www.eatrightpro.org/-/media/eatrightpro-files/practice/position-and-practice-papers/position-
papers/partnershipforhealthyagingpositionstatement.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2019.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-4 2/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Manage Feeding Environment
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Dementia
Inability to stick to task/easily distracted by others
Familial, societal, biological/genetic, and/or environmental-
Etiology related obsessive desire to be thin
Avoidance behavior to strong food aromas
Lack of developmental readiness to perform self-management
tasks
Client History
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-5 1/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Manage Feeding Environment
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. Dorner B, Friedrich EK. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Individualized nutrition
approaches for older adults: Long-term care, post-acute care, and other settings. J Acad Nutr Diet.
2018;118(4):724-735. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1554-1563.
2. Partnership for Health in Aging. Position Statement on Interdisciplinary Team Training in Geriatrics: An
Essential Component of Quality Healthcare for Older Adults.
https://www.eatrightpro.org/-/media/eatrightpro-files/practice/position-and-practice-papers/position-
papers/partnershipforhealthyagingpositionstatement.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.31 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-5 2/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Nutrition Related Medication Management
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Management of nutrition related prescription medication (eg, insulin, appetite stimulants, digestive
enzymes) dose, form, schedule, route
Management of nutrition related over the counter (OTC) medication (eg, antacids, aspirin, laxatives)
dose, form, schedule, route
Management of nutrition related complementary and alternative medicine (eg, peppermint oil, probiotics),
dose, form, schedule, route
Nutrition Diagnostic
Terminology Used in PES Common Examples
Statements
Altered GI function (NC-1.4)
Impaired nutrient utilization (NC-2.1)
Nutrition Diagnoses Altered nutrition related laboratory values (NC-2.2)
Food medication interaction (NC-2.3)
Predicted food medication interaction (NC-2.4)
Anthropometric Measurements
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-6 1/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Nutrition Related Medication Management
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Pediatric Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/. Accessed February 26, 2020.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-6 2/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Infant Feeding Management
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and
the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-7 1/2
12/15/21, 9:11 PM Infant Feeding Management
Decreased skin turgor
Evidence of dehydration
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Aspiration
Trauma, significant illness, coma
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeND-7 2/2
12/15/21, 9:13 PM Nutrition Education Content
Note: This reference sheet only refers to client nutrition education. Please use Nutrition Counseling (C)
for documentation of the Theoretical Basis/Approach (C-1) and Strategies (C-2) used for client behavior
change.
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeE-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:13 PM Nutrition Education Content
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Met with several providers in one day and is unable or unwilling to receive more nutrition education at
this time
Profile reflects complicated situation warranting additional education/instruction
Being discharged from the hospital
Caregiver unavailable at time of nutrition education
Baseline knowledge
Learning style
Other education and learning needs, eg, new medication or other treatment administration
Diminished literacy, including ability to read, write, comprehend information, or language barrier
Potential for referral to RDN with different expertise
Promote client defined health goals and outcomes
Counseling needed for the unmotivated or pre-contemplative client.
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Pediatric Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/. Accessed February 26, 2020.
4. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 scope of practice
for the nutrition and dietetics technician, registered. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(2):327-342.
5. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 scope of practice
for the registered dietitian nutritionist. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(1):141-165.
6. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 standards of
practice in nutrition care and standards of professional performance for nutrition and dietetics technicians,
registered. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(2):317-326.e313.
7. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 standards of
practice in nutrition care and standards of professional performance for registered dietitian nutritionists. J
Acad Nutr Diet.118(1):132-140.e115.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.21 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeE-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:13 PM Nutrition Education Application
Note: This reference sheet only refers to patient/client nutrition education. Please use Nutrition
Counseling (C) for documentation of the Theoretical Basis/Approach (C-1) and Strategies (C-2) used for
patient/client behavior change.
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeE-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:13 PM Nutrition Education Application
Other Considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.andeal.org/?auth=1. Accessed February 13, 2020.Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
2. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/index.cfm. Accessed February 27, 2020.
3. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Pediatric Nutrition Care Manual.
https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/. Accessed February 26, 2020.
4. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 scope of practice
for the nutrition and dietetics technician, registered. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(2):327-342.
5. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 scope of practice
for the registered dietitian nutritionist. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(1):141-165.
6. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 standards of
practice in nutrition care and standards of professional performance for nutrition and dietetics technicians,
registered. J Acad Nutr Diet.118(2):317-326.e313.
7. Andersen D, Baird S, Bates T, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 standards of
practice in nutrition care and standards of professional performance for registered dietitian nutritionists. J
Acad Nutr Diet.118(1):132-140.e115.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 1.38 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeE-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach
THEORETICAL BASIS/APPROACH
Application Guidance
One or more of the following theories or theoretical models may influence a practitioner’s counseling style or
approach. Practitioners are asked to identify those theories (C-1) that most influence the intervention being
documented. An intervention might also incorporate tools and strategies derived from a variety of behavior
change theories and models. The practitioner is also asked to indicate which strategies (C-2) they used in a
particular intervention session.
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
The following theories and models have proven valuable in providing a theoretical framework for evidence-
based individual and interpersonal level nutrition interventions. Other theories may be useful for community
level interventions (eg, Community Organization, Diffusion of Innovations, Communication Theory).
Additional information regarding each of the above theories and models can be found within this reference sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1 1/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Lifestyle factors
Language barrier
Educational level
Culture
Socioeconomic status
References
1. Glanz K. Current theoretical bases for nutrition intervention and their uses. In Coulston AM, Rock CL,
Monsen E. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA: Academy Press;
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1 2/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach
2001:83-93.
2. Powers MA, Carstensen K, Colon K, Rickheim P, Bergenstal RM. Diabetes BASICS: education,
innovation, revolution. Diabetes Spectrum. 2006;19:90-98.
3. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice.
3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1 3/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Cognitive-Behavioral Theory
Theoretical Basis/Approach
Nutrition Counseling Based on Cognitive Behavioral Theory Approach (C-1.1)
Description
Cognitive Behavioral Theory (CBT) is based on the assumption that all behavior is learned and is directly related
to internal factors (eg, thoughts and thinking patterns) and external factors (eg, environmental stimulus and
reinforcement) that are related to the problem behaviors. Application involves use of both cognitive and
behavioral change strategies to effect behavior change.
Goal directed
Process oriented
Facilitated through a variety of problem-solving tools
Behavioral and cognitive techniques to modify eating and exercise habits are taught for continuous application
by the client. Practitioners implement Cognitive Behavioral Theory by partnering with clients to study their
current environment to:
Identify determinants or antecedents to behavior that contribute to less than optimal eating/exercise
Identify resultant behavior (eg, overeating, vomiting)
Analyze consequences of this behavior (cognitions, positive and negative reinforcers and punishments,
eg, decreased anxiety, feeling over full, losing or gaining weight)
Make specific goals to modify the environment/cognitions to reduce target behaviors
Cognitive and behavioral strategies used to promote change in diet and physical activity may include:
Goal setting
Self monitoring
Problem solving
Social support
Stress management
Stimulus control
Cognitive restructuring
Relapse prevention
Rewards and contingency management
References
1. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-CBT 1/2
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Cognitive-Behavioral Theory
2. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995;20:155-163.
3. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
4. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
5. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-CBT 2/2
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Health Belief Model
Theoretical Basis/Approach
Nutrition Counseling Based on Health Belief Model (C-1.2)
Description
The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a psychological model that focuses on an individual’s attitudes and beliefs to
attempt to explain and predict health behaviors. The HBM is based on the assumption that an individual will be
motivated to take health-related action if that person (1) feels that a negative health condition (eg, diabetes) can
be avoided or managed, (2) has a positive expectation that by taking a recommended action, he or she will avoid
negative health consequences (eg, good blood glucose control will preserve eye sight), and (3) believes he or she
can successfully perform a recommended health action (eg, I can use carbohydrate counting and control my diet.
I can engage in regular physical activity).
These six constructs are useful components in designing behavior change programs. It is important for the
practitioner to understand the patient’s perception of the health threat and potential benefits of treatment.
According to the HBM, an asymptomatic diabetic may not be compliant with his or her treatment regiment if he
or she does not:
Constr
Definition Strategies
uct
Perceiv Client’s belief or opinion of the personal threat a health Educate on disease/condition risk
ed condition represents for them; client opinion regarding factors
Suscepti whether they have the condition (eg, diabetes or Tailor information to the client
bility hypertension) or their chance of getting the disease or Ask client if they think they are at
condition risk or have the disease/condition
Guided discussions
Motivational interviewing (express
empathy, open-ended questions,
reflective listening, affirming,
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-HBM 1/2
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Health Belief Model
How-to education
Incentive programs
Link current symptoms to
Cues to disease/condition
Internal or external triggers that motivate or stimulate action
Action Discuss media information
Reminder phone calls/mailings
Social support
Skill training/demonstration
Introduce alternatives and choices
Self- Client confidence in their ability to successfully accomplish Behavior contracting; small,
Efficacy the necessary action incremental goals
Coaching, verbal reinforcement
References
1. Glanz K. Current theoretical bases for nutrition intervention and their uses. In Coulston AM, Rock CL,
Monsen E. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA: Academy Press;
2001:83-93.
2. Powers MA, Carstensen K, Colon K, Rickheim P, Bergenstal RM. Diabetes BASICS: education,
innovation, revolution. Diabetes Spectrum. 2006;19:90-98.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.63 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-HBM 2/2
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Social Learning Theory
Theoretical Basis/Approach
Conce
Definition Strategies
pt
Consider multiple
behavior change strategies
targeting motivation,
Recipr action, the individual and
A person’s ability to change a behavior is influenced by characteristics the environment:
ocal
within the person (eg, beliefs), the environment, and the behavior itself Motivational interviewing
Deter
(eg, difficulty doing the behavior). All three interact to influence if the Social support
minis
behavior change will happen. Stimulus control
m
Demonstration
Skill development
training/coaching
Motivational interviewing
Expect For a person to do a behavior, they must believe that the behavior will Model positive outcomes
ations result in outcomes important to them of diet/exercise
Self- Confidence in ability to take action and persist in action Break task down to
Effica component parts
cy Demonstration/modeling
Skill development
training/coaching
Reinforcement
Small, incremental
goals/behavioral
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-SLT 1/2
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Social Learning Theory
contracting
Obser Demonstrations
vation Role modeling
When a person learns how to do a behavior by watching credible
al Group problem-solving
others do the same behavior
Learni sessions
ng
Affirm accomplishments
Encourage self-
Reinfo reward/self-reinforcement
Response to a behavior that will either increase or decrease the Incentives for process
rceme
likelihood that the behavior will be repeated components of change (eg,
nt
keeping a food diary or
physical activity log)
References
1. Glanz K. Current theoretical bases for nutrition intervention and their uses. In Coulston AM, Rock CL,
Monsen E. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA: Academy Press;
2001:83-93.
2. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
3. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
4. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice.
3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-SLT 2/2
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Transtheoretical Model Stages of Change
Theoretical Basis/Approach
Precontemplation – no recognition of need for change; no intention to take action within the next 6
months
Contemplation – recognition of need to change; intends to take action within the next 6 months
Preparation – intends to take action in the next 30 days and has taken some behavioral steps in that
direction
Action – has made changes in target behavior for less than 6 months
Maintenance – has changed target behavior for more than 6 months
Determination of a client stage of change is relatively simple, involving a few questions regarding intentions and
current diet. One of the appealing aspects of the theory is that the Process of Change construct describes
cognitive and behavioral activities or strategies, which may be applied at various stages to move a person
forward through the stages of change. This movement is not always linear, and clients can cycle in and out of
various stages. The model has been used to effectively tailor interventions to the needs of clients at various
stages. Knowing a client’s stage of change can help a practitioner determine:
The following table provides guidance for applying stages and processes of change to the adoption of healthful
diets.
This theoretical basis/approach has also been used with regard to physical activity.
Table 3
General Guidelines for Applying Stages and Processes of Change to Adoption of Heathful Diets
State Key Strategies for Treatment Do’s at This Stage Treatment Don’ts at This Stage
of Moving to Next
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-TMSC 1/3
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Transtheoretical Model Stages of Change
Read Stage
iness
Do not assume client has knowledge
Provide personalized or expect that providing information
Preco information. will automatically lead to behavior
Increased information Allow client to express change.
ntem
and awareness, emotions about his or her Do not ignore client’s emotional
platio
emotional acceptance disease or about the need to adjustment to the need for dietary
n
make dietary changes. change, which could override ability
to process relevant information.
Source: Kristal AR, Glanz K, Curry S, Patterson RE. How can stages of change be best used in dietary
interventions? J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:683.
Prochaska recommends the following strategies, which target motivation, be used in the early stages of change:
consciousness raising, dramatic relief (eg, emotional arousal via role playing or personal testimonials),
environmental reevaluation (eg, empathy training and family interactions), social liberation (eg, advocacy,
empowerment) and self-reevaluation (eg, value clarification, healthy role models, and imagery). These strategies
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-TMSC 2/3
12/15/21, 9:15 PM Theoretical Basis/Approach—Transtheoretical Model Stages of Change
are very consistent with motivational interviewing techniques. In the later stages of change, behavioral strategies
are most appropriate.
References
1. Glanz K. Current theoretical bases for nutrition intervention and their uses. In Coulston AM, Rock CL,
Monsen E. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA: Academy Press;
2001:83-93.
2. Green GW, Rossi SR, Rossi JS, Velicer WF, Fava JL, Prochaska JO. Dietary applications of the stages of
change model. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99:673-678.
3. Kristal AR, Glanz K, Curry S, Patterson RE. How can stages of change be best used in dietary
interventions? J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99: 679-684.
4. Krummel DA, Semmens E, Boury J, Gordon PM, Larkin KT. Stages of Change for weight management
in postpartum women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1102-1108.
5. Nothwehr F, Snetselaar L, Yang J, Wu H. Stage of change for healthful eating and use of behavioral
strategies. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1035-1041.
6. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-1-TMSC 3/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Strategies
STRATEGIES
Strategies (C-2)
Definition
An evidence-based method or plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. Application of behavior
change theories in nutrition practice has provided practitioners with a collection of evidence-based strategies to
promote behavior change. Some strategies target change in motivation and intention to change, and others target
behavior change. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners selectively apply strategies based on client goals and
objectives, and their personal counseling philosophy and skill.
Application Guidance
An intervention typically incorporates tools and strategies derived from a variety of behavior change theories and
models. The practitioner is asked to indicate which Strategies (C-2) he or she used in a particular intervention
session along with the Theories (C-1) that most influence the intervention being documented.
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
The following strategies have proven valuable in providing effective nutrition-related (eg nutrition therapy,
physical activity) behavior change.
Additional information regarding each of the above strategies can be found within this reference sheet.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2 1/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Strategies
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Lifestyle factors
Language barrier
Educational level
Culture
Socioeconomic status
References
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2 2/3
12/15/21, 9:14 PM Strategies
1. Glanz K. Current theoretical bases for nutrition intervention and their uses. In Coulston AM, Rock CL,
Monsen E. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA: Academy Press;
2001:83-93.
2. Powers MA, Carstensen K, Colon K, Rickheim P, Bergenstal RM. Diabetes BASICS: education,
innovation, revolution. Diabetes Spectrum. 2006;19:90-98.
3. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice.
3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2002.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2 3/3
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Motivational Interviewing
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-MI 1/3
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Motivational Interviewing
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-MI 2/3
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Motivational Interviewing
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.15 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-MI 3/3
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Goal Setting
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-GS 1/2
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Goal Setting
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-GS 2/2
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Self-Monitoring
STRATEGY: SELF-MONITORING
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SM 1/2
12/15/21, 9:16 PM Strategy: Self-Monitoring
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SM 2/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Problem Solving
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-PS 1/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Problem Solving
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.20 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-PS 2/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Social Support
Establishing a collaborative
Increased availability of social support for
relationship
dietary and physical activity behavior
Identifying family/community support
change. Social support may be generated
Social Support Assisting clients in developing
among an individual’s family, church,
assertiveness skills.
school, co-workers, health club, or
Utilize modeling, skill training,
community.
respondent and operant conditioning
Conducting education in a group
Encourage family involvement
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SS 1/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Social Support
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.17 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SS 2/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Stress Management
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SMGT 1/2
12/15/21, 9:17 PM Strategy: Stress Management
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.17 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SMGT 2/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Stimulus Control
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SC 1/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Stimulus Control
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.12 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-SC 2/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Cognitive Restructuring
Strate
Description Implementation Tips
gy
Self-monitoring and techniques such as the ABC
Technique of Irrational Beliefs may help clients to
become more aware of thoughts that interfere in their
ability to meet behavioral goals.
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-CR 1/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Cognitive Restructuring
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-CR 2/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Relapse Prevention
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-RP 1/2
12/15/21, 9:18 PM Strategy: Relapse Prevention
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-RP 2/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Strategy: Rewards/Contingency Management
References
1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York:
Guilford Press; 2002.
2. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Institute for Motivation and Change. http://www.miinstitute.com/index.php?
page=resources. Accessed June 15, 2015.
3. Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L,
Ahrens L, Smith K for the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. A brief
motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:399-
410.
4. Snetselaar L. Counseling for change. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition, &
Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000.
5. Brug J, Spikmans F, Aartsen C, Breedbveld B, Bes R, Fereira I. Training dietitians in basic motivational
interviewing skills results in changes in their counseling style and in lower saturated fat intakes in their
patients. J Nutr Ed Behav. 2007;39:8-12.
6. DiLillo V, Siegfried NJ, West DS. Incorporating motivational interviewing into behavioral obesity
training. Cognit Behav Pract. 2003;10:120-130.
7. NHLBI Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity, Electronic Textbook. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
pro/guidelines/current/obesity-guidelines/e_textbook/. Accessed June 15, 2015.
8. Estabrooks P, Nelson C, Xu S, King D, Bayliss E, Gaglio B, Nutting P, Glasgow R. The frequency and
behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):391-
400.
9. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of
successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;52:219-224.
10. Foster GD. Clinical implications for the treatment of obesity. Obesity. 2006;14:182S-185S.
11. Brownell KD, Cohen LR. Adherence to Dietary Regimens 2: components of effective interventions.
Behav Med. 1995; 20:155–163.
12. D’Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR. Problem solving and behavior modification. J Abnorm Psychol.
1971;78:107-126.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-RCM 1/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Strategy: Rewards/Contingency Management
13. Barrere M, Toobert D, Angell K, Glasgow R, Mackinnon D. Social support and social-ecological
resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:483-
495.
14. Berkel LA, Poston WS, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Behavioral interventions for obesity. J Am Diet Assoc.
2005;105:S35-S43.
15. Snetselaar L. Nutritional Counseling for Lifestyle Change. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007:117-
119.
16. Snetselaar LG. Nutrition Counseling Skills for Medical Nutrition Therapy. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD:
Aspen Press; 2007
17. Fabricatore AN. Behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy of obesity: is there a difference? J Am
Diet Assoc. 2007:107:92-99.
18. Kiy AM. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational counseling and therapy. In: Helm KK, Klawitter B.
Nutrition Therapy: Advanced Counseling Skills. Lake Dallas, TX: Helms Seminars; 1995:135-154.
19. Irvin JE, Bowers CA, Dunn ME, Wang MC. Efficacy of relapse prevention: a meta-analytic review. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:563-570.
20. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente V. Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for
Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life Positively Forward. New York, NY: Avon Books Inc;
1994.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.23 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeC-2-RCM 2/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Collaboration and Referral of Nutrition Care
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Team meeting involving nutrition professional (Holding a team meeting to develop a comprehensive plan
of care)
Referral by nutrition professional to another nutrition professional with different expertise (A referral for
care by other nutrition and dietetics practitioners who provide different expertise)
Collaboration by nutrition professional with other nutrition professionals (Collaboration by nutrition and
dietetics practitioner with other nutrition and dietetics practitioners)
Collaboration by nutrition professional with other providers (Collaboration with others such as the
physician, dentist, physical therapist, social worker, occupational therapist, speech therapist, nurse,
pharmacist, or other specialist dietitian)
Referral by nutrition professional to other provider (Refer to others such as the physician, dentist,
physical therapist, social worker, occupational therapist, speech therapist, nurse, pharmacist, or other
specialist nutrition and dietetics practitioner)
Referral by nutrition profesional to community agencies and programs (Refer to an appropriate
agency/program (eg, home delivered meals), assistance programs for women, infants and children [eg,
WIC], food assistance programs [eg, food pantry, soup kitchen, food stamps], housing assistance,
shelters, rehabilitation, physical and mental disability programs, education training, and employment
programs)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeRC-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Collaboration and Referral of Nutrition Care
Mental disability
Growth and development issues
Nutrient drug interactions
Transportation issues
Food acceptance issues
Developmental issues
Economic considerations impacting food/nutrient intake
Anthropometric Measurements
Weight loss
Unacceptable growth rates compared to standard growth charts
Food/Nutrition-Related History
Client History
Anorexia nervosa
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
Availability of services related to client need (specialty dietitians, clinical pharmacists, speech
pathologists, nurse practitioners, etc.)
Anticipated duration of health care encounter/hospital or long-term care discharge
Resources available for care
Availability of or access to government medical programs (eg, Medicare/Medicaid, healthcare exchanges)
insurance guidelines and restrictions
Availability of or access to food assistance program (eg, food stamp program) guidelines and regulations
References
1. McLaughlin C, Tarasuk V, Kreiger N. An examination of at-home food preparation activity among low-
income, food insecure women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:1506-1512.
2. Greger JL, Maly A, Jensen N, Kuhn J, Monson K, Stocks A. Food pantries can provide nutritionally
adequate food packets but need help to become effective referral units for public assistance programs. J
Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1125-1128.
3. Position of the American Dietetic Association on food insecurity in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.
2010;110:1368-1377.
4. Millen BE, Ohls JC, Ponza M, McCool AC. The elderly nutrition program: an effective national
framework for preventive nutrition interventions. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:234-240.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.11 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeRC-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Discharge and Transfer of Nutrition Care to a New Setting or Provider
Details of Intervention
A typical intervention might be further described with the following details. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners
recommend, implement, or order nutrition interventions and the action(s) may be to initiate, modify or
discontinue a nutrition intervention(s):
Discharge and transfer of nutrition care to other providers: Refer to others such as the physician, dentist,
physical therapist, social worker, occupational therapist, speech therapist, nurse, or pharmacist
Discharge and transfer of nutrition care to community agencies and programs: Refer to a community
agency/program (eg, home delivered meals, assistance programs for women, infants and children
[eg,WIC], food assistance programs [eg, food pantry, soup kitchen, food stamps], housing assistance,
shelters, rehabilitation, physical and mental disability programs, education, training and employment
programs)
Discharge and transfer of nutrtion care from nutrition professional to another nutrition professional:
Transfer of nutrition care to another nutrition and dietetics practitioner
Anthropometric Measurements
Food/Nutrition-Related History
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeRC-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:19 PM Discharge and Transfer of Nutrition Care to a New Setting or Provider
Client History
Treatment failure
Readmission
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. Baker EB, Wellman NS. Nutrition concerns for discharge planning for older adults: a need for
multidisciplinary collaboration. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:603-607.
2. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food and Nutrition for Older Adults: Promoting
Health and Wellness. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112:1255-1277.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeRC-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Theoretical Frameworks
Application Guidance
Theories and models are used to analyze and describe a process or occurrence and inform ways to address a
problem. Researchers and practitioners draw from theories and models and apply them in systematic approaches
relevant to specific situations. Theories, models and approaches are referred to generally as theoretical
frameworks. Theoretical frameworks used to guide change in institutions and society are different from those
applied to individual level change. (See Theoretical Bases/Approaches for individual change in the Nutrition
Counseling Domain reference sheet.) The theoretical frameworks, listed below are used in assessing, planning,
implementing and evaluating population-based nutrition actions. While the social ecological model provides an
overarching model for all intervention approaches, the others provide distinct approaches and concepts to guide
and inform the design of population-based interventions. Incorporating theoretical considerations into population
based nutrition actions leads to more effective outcomes and is aligned with evidence-based practice. For
example, community organizing is used to mobilize action for community gardens and farmers markets, and
organizational change theory is used when implementing evidence-based guidelines across systems. Using
standard terminology to describe the theoretical foundation for interventions is important for advancing
population-based nutrition work.
Details of Intervention
A population based nutrition action is typically described with details regarding the theoretical framework used
in its development and implementation. The aim and key concepts of commonly used theories, models and
approaches, and examples of nutrition and dietetic practitioners’ actions when they are applied are linked to each
theoretical framework.
The included theoretical frameworks represent those that are frequently applied in population-based nutrition
actions. This is not all inclusive, and nutrition practitioners may draw on other theories, models and approaches
as relevant to a particular nutrition problem and its context.
Anthropometric Measurements
Growth, weight, BMI indicators at risk status
Signs and Symptoms
Food/Nutrition-Related History
(Defining Characteristics)
Nutrient of food group data indicating inadequate intake or
excessive intake
Physical activity, type and frequency
Location, distance to, or rate per population with access to
full service grocery store
Other considerations
References
Refer to the theoretical frameworks above for references associated with each.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.26 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Social Ecological Model
Theory, Model or Approach Key Concepts Nutrition and Dietetic Practitioner's Actions
The social ecological model Concepts: Nutrition and dietetic practitioner’s actions
recognizes that human behavior is a include:
Introducing changes at two or more levels
consequence of interactions among
can lead to synergy and optimize outcomes Consider the underlying determinants and
and across multiple levels of influence
the multiple influences of personal and
that are interdependent, interactive, Levels of Influence
environmental conditions that contribute to
and reinforcing. Intrapersonal: Individual characteristics such
the nutrition-related problem
as knowledge, attitudes, skills and behaviors,
Personal and environmental Identify potential opportunities at each
self-concept, health status, gender, genetics
influences are commonly defined in level to impact those conditions
and racial/ethnic identity
five levels: intrapersonal, Prioritize high-impact leverage points for
Interpersonal: Relationships and formal and
interpersonal, institutional, change at multiple levels
informal social networks and social support
community, and policy. Seek out evidence-based approaches for
systems, including family, work group, and
institutional, community, and policy level
The social ecological model facilitates friendship networks
interventions, to complement intrapersonal
a holistic examination and Institutional: Any structured and managed
and interpersonal approaches
understanding of a nutrition-related organization, business, association or
Integrate multidisciplinary perspectives in
problem and identification of potential government agency with procedures and
the design of the interventions
leverage points for corrective action policies for operation, including worksites,
Lead or collaborate with other entities to
throughout the levels of influence. schools, clinics, churches, and retail outlets
develop, fund, implement, and evaluate
Community: Relationships among formal
Aim: multi-level, multi-component interventions
and informal groups and organizations
Use appropriate methods to monitor
Social ecological interventions target within defined boundaries, including
implementation and determine progress
change strategies at more than one informational networks, community
and outcomes
level directly or indirectly, ideally associations, community leaders, non-profits
with measurable changes occurring at and businesses related to common concerns
each targeted level. such as health and safety, food access,
recreation and transportation
Policy: Local, state, national and global
laws, regulations and policies, affecting
allocation of resources, restricting or
incentivizing behaviors
References
1. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior, Chapter 20 in K Glanz, BK Rimer, K Viswanath, Eds. Health
Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
2. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282-
98.
3. Richard L, Gauvin L, Raine K. Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annu Rev
Public Health. 2011;32:307-326.
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-1-SEM 1/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Social Ecological Model
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.25 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-1-SEM 2/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Community Organizing
COMMUNITY ORGANIZING
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Community Organizing
Community organizing is
empowering the community
and working with them, not
doing it for them, nor is it
delivering services.
References
1. McKnight J, Plummer JM. Community Organizing: Theory and Practice. ANCD Institute.org
2. CTSA Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community
Engagement (Second Edition). Principles of Community Engagement, 2nd Edition. NIH Publication No.
11-7782, June 2011. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf.
Accessed 2/15/2016.
3. Wilcox A, Knapp A. Building communities that create health. Public Health Rep 2000;115:139-143.
4. Grills, C., Villanueva, S., Subica, A. M., Douglas, J. A. Communities creating healthy environments:
improving access to healthy foods and safe places to play in communities of color. Preventive Medicine,
2014;69(Suppl):S117–S119.
5. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research:
the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl
1):S40-S46.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.17 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Diffusion Innovations
DIFFUSION INNOVATIONS
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-3 1/2
12/15/21, 9:21 PM Diffusion Innovations
References
1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations 5th Ed. Simon and Schuster. 2003.
2. Reimer BK, Glanz K. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice 2nd Edition.
DHHS:National Cancer Institute. 2005.
3. Khalil, H. Knowledge translation and implementation science: what is the difference? International
Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2016;14(2):39–40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000086
4. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science.
2015;10:53. DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.21 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-3 2/2
12/15/21, 9:25 PM Social Marketing
SOCIAL MARKETING
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-4 1/2
12/15/21, 9:25 PM Social Marketing
References
1. Lefebvre, RC . Theories and Models in Social Marketing Reference. In PN Bloom & GT Gundlach
(Eds.), Handbook of Marketing and Society, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
2. Andreasen AR. Social Marketing in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2006.
3. Wasan PG. Revising social marketing mix: a socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Services Research.
2014;14(2):127-144.
4. Food Forum, Food and Nutrition Board, Health and Medicine Division, National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering, and Medicine. Food Literacy: How Do Communications and Marketing Impact Consumer
Knowledge, Skills, and Behavior? Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press
(US); 2016.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.25 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-4 2/2
12/15/21, 9:26 PM Organizational Change Theory
change in a process or Follows a defined problem solving Research and provide evidence
system and defining time- process, such as the PDSA Cycle for needed changes
specific and measurable Review best practices and
AIM Statement: Preparation step
goals for improvement, then evidence-based approaches
1. What are we trying to accomplish?
systematically planning Determine relevant process and
2. How will we know that a change is
specific actions, outcome measures
an improvement?
implementing them, Secure commitment of
3. What change can we make that will
measuring progress and resources and administrative
result in improvement?
adjusting the plan as approval for effort
necessary, and finally The AIM Statement should be clear,
Plan
standardizing and specific, measurable and time-bound.
institutionalizing successful Specify the area for
innovations and changes. PLAN: Plan a change improvement
Assemble team, and define roles
Models of improvement call 1. Identify area, problem or
and responsibilities
for engagement and opportunity for improvement
Obtain baseline data and seek
utilization of a team 2. Assemble the team
input from stakeholders to
throughout the steps of the 3. Examine the current approach
understand the current approach
improvement initiative. (baseline data, root causes, get input
and opportunities for
of customers and stakeholders)
Commonly applied in improvement
4. Identify potential solutions and
quality improvement Assess potential solutions and
select best
programs, updating pick solution most likely to
5. Develop an improvement theory
procedures (e.g., evidence- accomplish aims
(If…, then…)
based guidelines), Prepare detailed plans and
implementing new DO: Implement the plan timeline for implementation and
innovations or technology, 6. Test the change on a small scale evaluation
and/or in responding to 7. Collect data, document successes
Do
community or customer and problems, examine unintended
defined needs and side effects Oversee or provide guidance to
expectations the trial of the new way of
STUDY: Observe the results
doing things
The PDSA (Plan, Do, 8. Study the results, compare with
Collect, chart and display data
Study, Act) Cycle for baseline and intended aim
to determine effectiveness of the
Learning and Quality
ACT: Refine the change, as necessary, and test
Improvement is a widely
implement on large scale
used application of the Study
9. Continue testing and adjusting until
model for continuous
acceptable level of improvement is Bring expertise to the
quality improvement.
achieved interpretation of findings and
Aim: 10. Celebrate successes needed action steps
11. Standardize the improvement Report performance with
A deliberate and defined
12. Take steps to preserve gains and outcome measures and insights
method to bring about
sustain accomplishments for adjustments to plan
change in an organization’s
processes and outcomes to Act
improve internal operations
Standardize the improvement
and/or to be responsive to
and expand implementation,
community needs and
incorporate into procedures and
address population health
performance expectations
and nutrition issues.
Communicate accomplishments
to internal and external
stakeholders and advocate for
broader implementation
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-5 2/3
12/15/21, 9:26 PM Organizational Change Theory
References
1. Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC, Francisco VT. Mobilizing organizations for health promotion: theories of
organizational change, companion material. Chapter 15 in K Glanz, BK Rimer, K Viswanath, Eds. Health
Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008
http://www.med.upenn.edu/hbhe4/index.shtml
2. Wu, Sarah. (2013). Theories of Organizational Change
http://www.sfu.ca/uploads/page/14/GERO820_FALL2013_presentation_Sarah_Wu_Theories_of_Organiz
ational_Change.pdf
3. Langley GL, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The Improvement Guide: A
Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance, 2nd ed. . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers; 2009.
4. Thomas C, Corso L, Pietz H. Evaluation, performance management, and quality improvement:
understanding the role they play to improve public health.
http://www.cdc.gov/std/products/progevalwebinar-slides.pdf
5. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. How to Improve.
http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
6. NICHQ Model for Improvement http://www.nichq.org/about/expertise/improvement-
science/model_for_improvement
7. McLean GM. Organization Development: Principles, Processes, Performance. Oakland, CA: Berrett-
Koehler Publishers 2005
8. Braillie E, Bjarnholt C, Gruber M, Hughes R. A capacity-building conceptual framework for public
health nutrition practice. Public Health Nutrition. 2009. Doi:10.1017/S1368980008003078
9. NCC DPHP Workplace Health Promotion Toolkit Planning/Workplace Governance Module. Division of
Population Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
http:www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/planning/index.html
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.16 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-5 3/3
12/15/21, 9:26 PM Mass Communication
MASS COMMUNICATION
References
1. Abroms LC, and Maibach EW. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public health
behavior. Annu Rev Public Health, 2008;29:219-234.
2. Hornik R, Kelly B. Communication and diet: an overview of experience and principles. J Nutr Educ
Behav. 2007 Mar-Apr;39(2 Suppl):S5-12.
3. Wilson BJ. Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective? J
Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Mar-Apr;39(2 Suppl):S13-9.
4. Snyder LB. Health communications campaigns and their impact on behavior. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007
Mar-Apr; 39(2 Suppl):S32-40.
5. Making Health Communication Programs Work: A Planner’s Guide. DHHS, PHS, NIH, National Cancer
Institute, Office of Communications, 2002..
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.17 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-6 2/2
12/15/21, 9:26 PM Political Action
POLITICAL ACTION
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-7 2/3
12/15/21, 9:26 PM Political Action
References
1. Stachowiak, S. (2013). Pathways for Change: 10 Theories to Inform Advocacy and Policy Change
Efforts. Retrieved from http://orsimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Center_Pathways_FINAL.pdf.
2. Cerna L. (2013). The Nature of Policy Change and Implementation: A Review of Different Theoretical
Approaches. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/The%20Nature%20of%20Policy%20Change%20and%20Implementation.
pdf.
3. Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC. Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Community Coalitions: Moving
from Practice to Theory. In DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kelger MC. (Eds.) Emerging Theories in Health
Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2002:157-193.
http://www.astdd.org/docs/BPA2attachmentcoalitionB.pdf
4. Writing Policy Briefs: A Guide to Translating Science and Engaging Stakeholders.
http://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/womens-and-childrens-health-policy-
center/de/policy_brief/index.html
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.22 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-1-7 3/3
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Strategies
POPULATION STRATEGIES
Application Guidance
Population strategies are widely used to bring about changes that are external to the individual in order to
promote and protect the population’s health. The strategies are aimed at the structural aspects of the
environment, processes within programs, organizations and systems, and the laws and regulations that are the
root causes and contributing factors for many nutrition problems. An aim of these strategies is to create
supportive environments that “make the healthy choice the easy choice.”
Strategies are classified by the target of change: the Environment including food availability and access and the
built environment, especially as it affects physical activity opportunities, and societal norms; Organizational
Change including the process, procedures and policies (formal and informal) of programs, organizations,
institutions and systems, and Public Policy (local, state and national laws and regulations).
Nutrition and dietetic practitioners select from these strategies when planning population-based nutrition actions;
and when using these strategies they typically work in collaboration with other individuals and organization on
cross-sectoral, multi-level and multi-sector initiatives. The strategy (ies) chosen are guided by the nature of the
problem and its determinants. A single initiative can be planned or several strategies may be used simultaneously
resulting in reinforcing, multicomponent programs designed to address different underlying causes of the
problem.
Details of Intervention
A population-based nutrition action is typically described by identifying the target of change, and with details
regarding the strategy used as identified in the Population Strategies Table.
Environmental Change
Food environment change
Built environment change
Social norm change
Organizational Change
Public Policy Change
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2 1/2
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Strategies
Anthropometric Measurements
Growth, weight, BMI indicators at risk status
Signs and Symptoms
Food/Nutrition-Related History
(Defining Characteristics)
Nutrient of food group data indicating inadequate intake or
exessive intake
Physical activity, type and frequency
Location, distance to, or rate per population with access to
full service grocery store
Other considerations
References
Refer to the population strategies above for references associated with each.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:27 PM Population Strategies Environmental Change
Population Strategy
Additional information:
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2-1 1/2
12/15/21, 9:27 PM Population Strategies Environmental Change
References
Food Environment
1. Story M, Kaphinger KM, Robinson-O’Brian R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy
and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:253-272.
2. Gittelsohn J, Rowan M, Gadhoke P. Interventions in small food stores to change the food environment, improve
diet, and reduce risk of chronic disease. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E59. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Social Norms
1. Ball K, Jeffery RW, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Crawford D. Is healthy behavior contagious: associations of
social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:86
2. McNeill LH, Kreuter MW, Subramanian SV. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and
evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1011–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.012
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.35 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2-1 2/2
12/15/21, 9:27 PM Population Strategies Organizational Change
Population Strategy
System-wide examples:
References
1. Riley BL, Garcia JM, Edwards, NC. Organizational change obesity prevention-perspectives, possibilities
and potential pitfalls. Chapter 12 in Handbook of Obesity Prevention. Springer, 2007, pp 239-261.
2. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Toolkit Planning/Workplace
governance Module. Http:www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/planning/index.html.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.30 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2-2 2/2
12/15/21, 9:27 PM Population Strategies Policy Change
Population Strategy
References
1. Sallis J F, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J
Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):379–97. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00076-2.S0749379798000762
2. Food Security. Policy Brief. FAO Agriculture and Development Economics Division. June 2006 Issue 2.
Available at http://www.fao.org/forestry/13128-0e6f36f27e0091055bec28ebe830f46b3.pdf.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.14 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-2-3 1/1
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Settings
POPULATION SETTINGS
Application Guidance
The setting specifies the places where the intervention is delivered to most effectively reach and impact the
population experiencing the identified nutrition-related problem. A population-based nutrition action may be
delivered in more than one setting in a coordinated fashion (eg, school district and community recreation
centers). The intervention may involve one or more sites within the setting (eg, one child care center or all child
care centers in the county or state). The choice of setting has implications for which strategies (see P-2) to
employ.
Some of these settings may also be useful in describing and documenting the location for delivery of individual
and group nutrition interventions. Nutrition and dietetic practitioners, along with collaborators (see P-4), select
from these settings when planning how and where population-based nutrition actions will be implemented in
order to have the greatest impact on the problem and its etiology/root causes/determinants. The setting also
identifies the target location where data (assessment, monitoring and evaluation indicators) can be collected to
assess progress and determine outcomes.
Details of Intervention
A population-based nutrition action is typically described with details regarding the settings where the
intervention is implemented. The settings listed in the Population Settings Table can be used to classify and
described the locations utilized.
Residential Settings
School Settings
Worksite Settings
Recreation and Sports Settings
Food Production and Provisions Settings
Service Settings
Government Settings
Community At Large Settings
Anthropometric Measurements
Growth, weight, BMI indicators at risk status
Signs and Symptoms
Food/Nutrition-Related History
(Defining Characteristics)
Nutrient of food group data indicating inadequate intake or
exessive intake
Physical activity, type and frequency
Location, distance to, or rate per population with access to
full service grocery store
Other considerations
References
1. Foltz JL, May AL, Belay B, et al. Population-Level Intervention Strategies and Examples for Obesity
Prevention in Children. Annu Rev Nutr 2012. 32:391–415.
2. Khan O, Sobush K, Keener D, Goodman K, Lowry A. et al. Recommended Community Strategies and
Measurements to Prevent Obesity in the United States. MMWR 2009;58(RR-7):1-26.
3. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2015. Cross-sector responses to obesity: Models for change. Workshop
summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.22 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-3 2/2
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Sectors
POPULATION SECTORS
Application Guidance
Sectors are unique yet interdependent entities that have differing types of influence on and interest in healthy
food and healthy people. Considering a broader range of sectors opens new possibilities for interventions
directed to the underlying determinants of population nutrition problems. Each sector has numerous
constituencies that are potential collaborators for identifying opportunities and developing, implementing and
evaluating interventions. Through mobilizing cross-sector collaboration, awareness is raised, complementary
strengths and combined resources can be applied to problematic aspects of complex nutrition problems, and
evidence-based and promising practices can be expanded. Additionally, cross-sector interventions promote
solidarity in action, and foster transparency and public accountability. For example, food companies, researchers,
schools, farmer and producer associations, professional sports teams, government programs, and healthcare
systems have different, but coordinated roles in collaborative efforts to address underlying causes of childhood
obesity.
The sectors and constituents are frequently involved in collaborative work to tackle problems and their
underlying causes and advance population nutrition goals. Cross-sector, multi-level, multi-component programs
have been shown to be more effective than single interventions and are commonly used to address challenging
nutrition and health issues of the population. Many national and international nutrition intervention efforts
attribute success to collaborative and coordinated work that engages multiple sectors.
Other terminology related to the concept of sectors includes: stakeholders, partners, players, and affiliates who
come together in formal and informal alliances, coalitions, councils, networks, partnerships, or workgroups.
Details of Intervention
A population-based nutrition action is typically described with details regarding who is engaged in collaborative
efforts. The sectors and constituents in the Population Sectors Table can be used to identify potential
collaborators and then describe those that participate in the planning, implementation and/or evaluation of the
population-based nutrition action.
Agriculture Sector
Education Sector
Government Sector
Healthcare Sector
Food and Beverage Sector
Business and Industry Sector
Social Welfare Sector
Nonprofit Sector
Communities, Neighborhoods, Families Sector
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-4 1/3
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Sectors
PES Statements
Overweight/obesity (NC-3.3)
Physical inactivity (NB-2.1)
Altered nutrition-related laboratory values (NC-2.2)
Nutrition Diagnoses Undesirable food choices (NB-1.7)
Intake of unsafe food (NB-3.1)
Other: Any diagnoses related to inadequate, excessive, or
inconsistent intake
Anthropometric Measurements
Growth, weight, BMI indicators at risk status
Signs and Symptoms
Food/Nutrition-Related History
(Defining Characteristics)
Nutrient of food group data indicating inadequate intake or
exessive intake
Physical activity, type and frequency
Location, distance to, or rate per population with access to
full service grocery store
Other considerations (eg, client negotiation, client needs and desires, and readiness to change)
References
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020
Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. Chapter 3 Everyone Has a Role in Supporting Healthy
Eating Patterns. December 2015. Available at http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/.
2. Institute of Medicine. Bridging the evidence gap in obesity prevention: a framework to inform decision
making. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2010
3. UNICEF. Multi-sectoral Approaches to Nutrition: Nutrition-specific and Nutrition sensitive Interventions
to Accelerate Progress. www.unicef.org/eapro/Brief_Nutrition_Overview.pdf. Accessed 2/13/2016.
4. USAID. Multi-sectoral Nutrition Strategy 2014-2025. May 2014.
www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1867/USAID_Nutrition_Strategy_5-09_508.pdf. Accessed
2/13/2016.
5. Levinson FJ, Balarajan Y. (2013). Addressing malnutrition multisectorally: What have we learned from
recent international experience? UNICEF Working Paper. New York: UNICEF and MDG Achievement
Fund.
6. The World Bank (2013). Improving Nutrition through Multi-sectoral Nutrition Approaches. Washington,
DC: The World Bank.
7. Black RE, et al for the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Executive Summary of the Lancet
Maternal and Child Nutrition Series. The Lancet.com
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-4 2/3
12/15/21, 9:20 PM Population Sectors
2020 EDITION
COPYRIGHT 2021. POWERED BY WEBAUTHOR ®. PRIVACY POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LX-131-61 (EXECUTION TIME: 0.13 SECONDS)
https://www.ncpro.org/pubs/2020-encpt-en/codeP-4 3/3