Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Analysis
Critical Analysis
Abstract
The abstract is coherent and captures the synopsis of the entire study in terms of the aim
of the research, methods, findings, and recommendations. The author has articulated all the ideas
briefly, making it captivating, and the reader desires to read the entire article. Additionally, the
presentation of the statistics in the abstract proves that the research went to greater lengths to
come to the conclusion that the invention of COVID-19 was highly protective.
Introduction
The review was conducted by Zheng and co-researchers to determine the real-world
effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. As such, the review enriches the public and healthcare
professionals about the vaccines developed to combat coronavirus. By presenting the facts about
these vaccines, the researchers have bridged the gap of inadequate knowledge of whether these
vaccines are effective which is what the public has been waiting to know for a long time. The
previous reviews never addressed various vaccines and made profound comparisons like the one
done in this study, which is why the study is relevant. The objective aligns with the thesis
statement and is well structured – to estimate the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against
The review registration number is 1201-9712 and is published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf
of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. The protocol can be accessed at
amended. The study never received any form of sponsorship from funding agencies in the
commercial, public, or even not-for-profit sectors. There were no competing interests when it
comes to the authors that reviewed the article. The data was extracted from other scholarly
articles and government publication and can be easily acquired by the public by downloading the