Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Chemistry TOC

Proceeding of ISEC 2003


2003 International Solar Energy Conference
Hawaii, USA, 15-18 March 2003
ISEC2003-44301

SOLAR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION –


DIRECT WATER SPLITTING INTO HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN BY NEW PHOTOCATALYSTS
UNDER VISIBLE LIGHT IRRADIATION

Hironori Arakawa* Zhigang Zou


Photoreaction Control Research Center (PCRC)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
AIST Tsukuba Central-5, 1-1-1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
E-mail:h.arakawa@aist.go.jp

Kazuhiro Sayama Ryu Abe


Photoreaction Control Research Center (PCRC)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
AIST Tsukuba Central-5, 1-1-1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan

ABSTRACT developed yet. We have been investigating such a new


The photocatalytic splitting of water into hydrogen and photocatalytic system by two different approaches. The one is
oxygen using solar energy is one of the most attractive to design and synthesize narrow band gap oxide semiconductor
renewable sources of hydrogen fuel. Therefore, considerable photocatalysts which are able to split water under visible light
efforts have been paid in developing photocatalysts capable of irradiation. The other is to design the two-step water splitting
using visible light, which accounts for about 43% of the solar system which is composed of the combination of two different
energy. However such a photocatalyst has not been developed oxide semiconductor photocatalysts for H2 and O2 production,
so far. We have developed a new Ni-doped indium-tantalum respectively, and a shuttle redox mediator working in between
oxide photocatalyst, In1-xNixTaO4 (x=0.0~0.2), which induced two photocatalysts. This system mimics the Z-scheme
direct splitting of water into stoichiometric amount of oxygen mechanism in natural photosynthetic process. These new
and hydrogen under visible light irradiation with a quantum approaches are introduced and discussed.
yield of about 0.66% at 420.7 nm. We have also developed a
new two-step water splitting system using two different NOMENCLATURE
semiconductor photocatalysts, Pt/WO3 photocatalyst for oxygen λ: wave length of irradiated light, TEM: transmission electron
evolution and Pt/SrTiO3(Cr-Ta-doped) photocatalyst for micrograph, EDAX: energy dispersion analysis of x-ray, PSI:
hydrogen evolution, and a redox mediator, I-/IO3-, mimicking photosynthesis step I, PSII: photosynthesis step II.
the Z-scheme mechanism of the natural photosynthesis. The
quantum yield of this system was about 0.1% at 420.7nm. Both ONE STEP WATER SPLITTING BY NEW OXIDE
photocatalytic methods are the first examples for visible light SEMICONDUCTOR PHOTOCATALYSTS WITH A
water splitting system in the world. NARROW BAND GAP
We have synthesized various kinds of new mixed oxide
Keywords: Solar hydrogen production, Water splitting, Visible semiconductor materials which could absorb visible light. The
light, Powder photocatalysts, Oxide semiconductor, Pt/WO3, first group is Bi2MNbO7 (M= Al3+, Ga3+, In3+, Y3+, Rare Earth3+) 5)
SrTiO3 (Cr-Ta-doped), I-/IO3- redox mediator of A2B2O7 pyrochlore structure. The second group is BiMO4
(M=Nb5+, Ta5+)6) of stibotantalite structure and the third group is
INTRODUCTION InMO4 (M=Nb5+, Ta5+)7) of wolframite-type structure with space
Hydrogen production by direct splitting of water using group P2/a. Figure 1 shows the structure of InTaO4. The
photocatalysts under solar light is one of the most attractive structure contains TaO6 and InO6 octahedra in a unit cell. The
research subjects in terms of a clean energy supply in this InO6 octahedra share edges to form zigzag chains along the
century. Therefore, a number of researches on photocatalytic [100] direction, with individual [InO6]∞ octahedral chains linked
splitting of water have been conducted so far. As a result, by TaO6 octahedra into a three dimensional network. The
several oxide semiconductor photocatalysts, such as Na2CO3- volume of the InO6 and TaO6 octahedra in InTaO4 are 13.051
Pt/TiO2,1) NiOx/K4Nb6O17,2) NiOx/Ta2O53), and NiOx/NaTaO34), and 10.648 A3, respectively. Because the ionic radius of Ni2+
which were able to split water under UV light irradiation, were (0.78 A) is much smaller than that of In3+ (0.92 A), substituting
reported. However, photocatalysts, which can utilize visible In3+ by Ni2+ should reduce the volume of the InO6 octahedra, and
light for stoichiometric splitting of water, have not been

1 Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/conferences/isec2003/71909/ on 02/15/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/ab


hence the cell volume of InTaO4. This should in turn affect the
direct metal-metal bonding in the crystal, with the In-In
distance shortened, resulting in significant alternations of the
electronic properties of the compounds.

Abs. (arb.units)
x=0.1

x=0.0

200 400 600 800


Wavelength/nm
Fig. 2 UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of
In1-xNixTaO4 (X=0 and 0.1) at room temperature

Fig. 1 The unit cell structure of InTaO4 photocatalyst


Table 1. Rates of gas evolution properties of the
The band structure of these materials is estimated that the newly synthesized photocatalysts
conduction band is composed of Ta/Nb d-level mainly and the ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
valence band is composed of O 2p-level mainly. The band gaps Photocatalyst Rate of evolution (µ mol h-1)b)
of these materials determined by UV-visible reflectance spectra NiOx/ RuO2/
as shown in Figure 2 were between 2.7 and 2.4 eV. Among H2 O2 H2 O2
these materials, NiOx (surface oxidized Ni) or RuO2 promoted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a)
InTaO4 and InNbO4 photocatalysts, such as NiOx/InTaO4, SiO2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
RuO2/InTaO4 and NiOx/InNbO4, showed photocatalytic InTaO4 3.2 1.1 0.75 0.35
activities for pure water splitting under visible light irradiation In0.95Ni0.05TaO4 4.2 2.1 2.0 1.0
(λ > 420 nm, 300W Xe-lamp). However, the activities were In0.90Ni0.10TaO4 16.6 8.3 8.7 4.3
very low. In0.85Ni0.15TaO4 8.3 4.1 4.8 2.3
In order to improve water splitting activity, transition metal In0.80Ni0.20TaO4 4.3 0.9 0.83 0.4
doped InTaO4 and InNbO4 were synthesized.8) Among these ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
doped materials, Ni-doped InTaO4 and Ni-doped InNbO4 a): In order to investigate the effect of NiOx on
photocatalytic activity onto the surface of photocatalysts,
photocatalysts such as NiOx/In0.9Ni0.1TaO4, RuO2/ In0.9Ni0.1TaO4,
the 1.0wt%NiOx/SiO2 sample was prepared because SiO2
NiOx/In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 and RuO2/In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 showed the highest does not have photocatalytic activity under visible light
activities. Table 1 shows the result of photocatalytic water irradiation.
splitting using various kinds of Ni-doped InTaO4 photocatalysts. b): NiO / is 1.0wt% NiOx loading on the surface of
The rate of H2 and O2 evolution were 16.6 and 8.3 µmol/h, photocatalyst; RuO2/ is 1.0wt% RuO2 loading on the surface
respectively, and the quantum efficiency at 402 nm was 0.66% of photocatalyst. The rate of gas evolution was calculated
in the case of 1wt%NiOx/ In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 photocatalyst.9) The for 24 h using catalyst 0.5 g under visible light irradiation λ
absorption band due to Ni-doping was observed at 420-520nm > 420 nm.
in addition to that of In0.9Ni0.1TaO4. This is one of reasons of
activity increase. The stability of this photocatalyst and Figure 3 shows the evolution of H2 and O2 from pure water
reproducibility of photocatalytic water splitting reaction were containing aqueous suspension of NiOx/In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 under
fairly good. TEM photographs of In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 photocatalyst visible light irradiation ( λ > 420 nm ). The gas evolution
showed the particles size were 300 to 500 nm and NiOx stopped when the light was turned off, showing that the
particles on In0.9Ni0.1TaO4, were 15 to 30 nm. A clear formation reaction is induced by the absorption of visible light and not by
of stepped- structure was also observed in In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 tribological processes, such as the so-called mechano-catalysis.
particles and TEM-EDAX analysis showed In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 has a After evacuating the reaction system and re-running the
homogeneous atomic distribution.10) experiment, almost identical gas production rates were

2 Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/conferences/isec2003/71909/ on 02/15/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/ab


achieved in the second run. More than 7,200 µmol gases TWO STEP WATER SPLITTING BY TWO DIFFERENT
evolved (H2: about 4,800µmol; and O2: about 2,400µmol) OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR PHOTOCATALYSTS AND A
during the course of a 400-hours experiment. The catalysts REDOX MEDIATOR, MIMICKING A Z-SCHEME
samples remained unchanged during the course of reaction, MECHANISM IN NATURAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS
suggesting that the photocatalytic activity is stable under visible It is not easy to design efficient photocatalysts using a
light irradiation. The turnover number ( the ratio of total conventional reaction mechanism for one-step water splitting
amount of gas evolved to photocatalyst (1,412µmol ) exceeded under visible light irradiation as shown in Fig.1 (a). On the
5 after 400-hours reaction time. The turnover number in terms other hand, in natural photosynthesis, carbohydrate and O2 are
of reacted electrons relative to the amount of Ni loaded on the formed from CO2 and water using visible light under solar light
surface of the sample and Ni doped InTaO4 reached 39 at 400- irradiation. This system utilizes so-called Z-scheme reaction
hours reaction time, indicating that the reaction occurs which is composed of two photo-excitation centers, PSI and
catalytically. PSII, and many redox mediators. In order to develop the
photocatalytic water splitting into H2 and O2 stoiciometrically
under visible light irradiation, the mimicking system of the Z-
400 scheme mechanism using reversible redox mediators (Ox/Red)
as shown in Fig. 1 (b) was investigated.
Light Dark Light
Amount of evolved gases /µ mol

(a)
300
H2O
+
H2 H /H2 H2
O2
200
O2 / H2O
H2O
100 O2

(b)
PSII[O2] PSI[H2]
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 H2O
Ox
Irradiation time/h + H2
H /H2 Red
Ox/Red
Fig. 3 The reaction time course of photocatalytic H2
and O2 evolution O2 / H2O Red
H2O Ox
Experiment were conducted using 0.5g photocatalysts O2
powder suspended in 250 ml pure water in a pyrex glass
cell under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). Light
source: 300-W Xe lamp. The gases evolved were measured
Fig. 4 Reaction mechanisms of photocatalytic water
by a pressure gas sensor and determined by TCD splitting into H2 and O2
gaschromatograph.
(a): the conventional mechanism of photocatalytic water
The first principle calculations were conducted to splitting ( one-step photo-excitation system)
(b): the new mechanism mimicking the Z-scheme system
determine of the band structure of In0.9Ni0.1TaO4 using of ( two-step photoexcitation system)
In14Ni2Ta16O64 model. The electrons from the Ni-3d8 dopant
seem to be somewhat delocalized, thus contributing to the To look for both a stable shuttle redox mediator and its
formation of the new band with the O-2p electrons. Based on a appropriate reaction condition is very important. We found IO3-
comparison with the light absorption and photocatalytic activity, /I- redox system could work for water splitting using the
we think the eg state of the Ni-3d8 plays a significant role in the mixture of Pt/TiO2 (anatase) and TiO2 (rutile) photocatalysts as
photocatalytic splitting of pure water under visible light PSI[H2] and PSII[O2], respectively. The H2 evolution took place
irradiation. over Pt/TiO2 (anatase) with the oxidation of I- to IO3-, and O2
evolution took place over TiO2 (rutile) with the reduction of

3 Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/conferences/isec2003/71909/ on 02/15/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/ab


IO3- to I- in the one reactor under UV light irradiation.11) Various neutralize the total charge. WO3 for O2 evolution could absorb
kinds of visible light responding oxide semiconductor visible light up to 460 nm as shown in Figure 6..
photocatalysts, such as Fe2O3, Bi2WO6, In2O3(ZnO)9, CrTaO4,
InTaO4, SrTiO3 and so on, were screened for H2 evolution from

absorbance / arb.units
water including I- ion as a reversible electron donor. On the
other hand, O2 evolution from water including IO3- as a
reversible electron acceptor was also tested using various kinds
of oxide semiconductor photocatalysts such as WO3, In2O3, (c)
Bi2O3, BiVO4, CuWO4, NiWO4 and so on.
Finally, we found both H2 and O2 evolution with a (a) (b)
stoichiometric ratio of H2/O2=2/1 occurred stably for more than
250 hours under visible light irradiation using a mixture of 300 400 500 600 700 800
Pt/WO3 photocatalysts for O2 evolution and Pt/StTiO3(Cr, Ta- wavelength / nm
doped) photocatalyst for H2 evolution in NaI aqueous solution,
as shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 6 UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of (a)
SrTiO3, (b) SrTiO3 (Cr-Ta-doped), and (c) WO3
µ m ol

photocatalysts
100 dark
light light dark light
80 We have established a new visible light water splitting
am ou nt o f gas e vo lution /

system with a two-step photo-excitation mechanism using a


pair of I-/IO3- shuttle redox mediator. The quantum efficiency at
We 60
H 2 a new visible light water splitting system
established 420 nm was about 0.1%.12,13) A proposed reaction mechanism
40 for two-step water splitting by the combination of two different
photocatalysts, Pt/WO3 for O2 evolution and Pt/SrTiO3 (Cr-Ta-
20 doped) for H2 evolution, and a shuttle redox mediator, I-/IO3-, is
O2
shown in Fig. 7
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 PSII[O2] PS1[H2]
Tim e / h H2O
- Pt
e H2
-0.41 Pt +
e - H /H2
Fig. 5 Photocatalytic splitting of water into H2 and O2 IO3
0.09
under visible light ( λ > 420 nm ) I
- h
visible - -
PSI photocatalyst: 0.2g of 0.3wt%Pt/SrTiO3 doped with Cr
0.6 IO3 /I
and Ta (1 mol% of Ti was doped respectively) 0.8 h - O2/H2O
PSII photocatalysts: 0.2g of 1wt%Pt/WO3 IO3
O2 visible h+
Initial reaction solution: NaI aqueous solution (100 ml/l, -
pH=7.0) I
The magnetic stirring was continued under both light h+
H2O Pt-WO3 Pt-SrTiO3(Cr-Ta doped)
irradiation and dark reaction condition..

Fig. 6 shows the UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of


(a) SrTiO3 and (b) SrTiO3(Cr-Ta-doped). The non-doped
SrTiO3 absorbed UV light up to 395 nm, and the band gap was
estimated to be 3.1 eV. The absorption band of the doped Fig. 7 A proposed reaction mechanism for two-step
semiconductor was very broad and extended to more than 700 water splitting system
nm. The H2 evolution was observed on the Pt-loaded SrTiO3
(Cr-Ta-doped) under visible light even through 460 nm cutoff REFERENCES
filter. The SrTiO3 doped with Ta alone did not absorb visible [1] K.Sayama et al., J.Chem.Soc., Farady Trans.,
light. Therefore, the Cr doping caused the visible light response. 93,1647(1997).
The activity of the SrTiO3 photocatalyst doped with both Cr [2] K.Domen et al., J.Chem.Soc., Chem.Commun., 1986, 356.
and Ta was much higher than that doped with Cr only. It is [3] K.Sayama et al., J.Photochem.Photobiol. A:, 77, 243(1994).
speculated that substitution of Cr3+ for Ti4+ may cause some [4] A.Kudo et al., Chem.Lett., 1997, 867.
defects of the lattice in the SrTiO3 crystal structure due to the [5] Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al., J.Phys.Chem. B, 106,519(2002).
lack of the positive charge, and that the co-doping of Ta5+ might [6] Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al, J.Mater.Res., 17, 1446(2002).

4 Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/conferences/isec2003/71909/ on 02/15/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/ab


[7] Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al., Chem.Phys.Lett., 332, 271(2000).
[8] Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al., J.Photochem.Photobiol.A:, 148,
65(2002).
[9] Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al., Nature, 414, 625(2001).
[10]Z.Zou, H.Arakawa et al, J.Phys.Chem., in press
[11]R.Abe, H.Arakawaet al., Chem.Phys.Lett., 344, 339(2001).
[12]K.Sayama et al., J.Chem.Soc., Chem.Commun., 2001, 2416.
[13]K.Sayama, R.Abe, H.Arakawa, et al.,
J.Photochem.Photobiol.A:, 148, 71(2002).

5 Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/conferences/isec2003/71909/ on 02/15/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/ab

You might also like