Background Study

GROUP -5 : KRISTINE NICOLE J. ELLUDAR

EVAN MAE T. SININING

ADRIAN PAPAS

PRINCE BARRIGA

THE IMPLEMANTATION OF CROSS-DRESSING FOR GAY’S

STUDENTS IN MSU-BUUG

The Research topic.

laws can be challenged on various grounds. One’s choice of attire may be describe as an
expression Cross-dressing of individual liberty and autonomy, or an expressive statement
protected under the right to freedom of expression. And also cross-dressing may also be
considered an element of trans identity protected under non-discrimination and equality
guarantees.

The Research Problem.

How will able to know the implementation for gay’s students in MSU-Buug.

Evidence Justifying The Research Problem.

But these policies, while strong on paper, have not been adequately enforced. In the
absence of effective implementation and monitoring, many gay’s students continue to experience
bullying and harassment in school because they are not allowed to cross-dress, mistreatment that
students faced in schools was exacerbated by The discriminatory policies and practices that
excluded them from fully participating in the school environment.
In the Philippines, the implementation of CHED Memorandum No. 1 addresses the
concerns of LGBT population to be accepted and to fit in within the academic community. This
memorandum seeks to introduce and institutionalize gender equality, gender responsiveness and
sensitivity in various aspects in the Philippine higher education.

DEFICIENCIES IN EVIDENCE
 The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework guided EIP
implementation. EPIS is a four-phased implementation framework that emphasizes the careful
examination of outer and inner contexts and bridging factors during the Exploration phase to
inform future activities in the Preparation and Implementation phases. Outer contexts represent
the higher levels of influence on schools (e.g., school districts, communities, and state
educational systems), such as legislation and district policy, community-level advocacy, stigma,
and funding and According to Mayberry (2013), schools in the United States continue to be
hostile towards LGBT students. Many teachers and administrators fail to advocate for the rights
of LGBT students, . Human rights organizations hold local, county, and national school
administrators and legislators accountable for failing to deconstruct policies or eliminate
practices that allow vulnerable school children to be victimized indefinitely (Mayberry).

THE AUDIENCE
By examining these multiple students context, using qualitative approaches and
involving students as co-researchers, we can better understand the misconceptions for gay’s
students hold about the implementation in MSU-Buug. With this understanding, researches can
better isolate variables and develop about the cross-dress. Administrators and teacher can plan
interventions to prevent or change attitudes towards the implementation of cross-dress for gay’s
students in MSU-Buug.