Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Airqualitybeforeduringandafterduststormsin Baghdad Iraq
Airqualitybeforeduringandafterduststormsin Baghdad Iraq
net/publication/338527021
AIR QUALITY BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER DUST STORMS IN BAGHDAD, IRAQ
CITATIONS READS
0 232
3 authors:
Omar Laith
Al-Mustansiriya University
11 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Nagham Ibraheem on 27 January 2020.
Abstract
Dust storms in Iraq have increased dramatically over the last two decades. The Iraqi Ministry of Environment recording 122
dust storms and 283 dusty days in 2014.This research came to study the beaver of air quality values in Baghdad before,
during, and after four dust storms occurrence in 2011,by using two different line, the first related to the some chemical
gaseous pollutant concentrations and the second related to the concentration of the particulate matter. The results showed
that the concentrations of the chemical gaseous pollutants: SO2, NO2 and CO decreased on the day of the dust storm from
the day before and the day after it. For example, on the day before the dust storm which occur on 19/1/2011,the concentrations
was :(CO=1.5427)(NO2 =0.0364)(SO2 = 0.0314) while in the day of the storm : (CO=0.7369) (NO2=0.0260) (SO2=0.0303) and in the
day after it : (CO=1.3225)(NO2=0.0377)(SO2=0.0457).It was found that the behavior of these gases during the dust storms is
due to the impact of wind speed.
Key words : dust storm, air quality, Baghdad, pollutant gases.
14 0 0 .055 1 40 1. 6
pm10 pm1 0
NO 2 0 .050 CO
12 0 1 20 1. 4
)3
)3
0 .045
10 0 1 00 1. 2
g /m
0 .040 g /m
80 80 1. 0
0 .035
60 60 0. 8
0 .030
c ocNO
2
40 40 0. 6
0 .025
C O co n ce n tr at io n (p p m )
en tr a tio n (p pm )
p m 1 0 co nc en tr a tio n (
p m 1 0 co n ce n tr at ion (
20 20 0. 4
0 .020
0 0 .015 0 0. 2
18 19 20 18 19 20
Du st Sto rm Da ys Du st St or m D a ys
1 40 20 6 1 40 0 .0 5
p m 10 pm 1 0
T S O2
1 20 Wi nd 1 20
5
16 0 .0 4
)3
)3
1 00 1 00
4
g/ m
g /m
12 0 .0 3
80 80
3
60 60
8 0 .0 2
2
T em p e ra tu re ( C)
W ind s pe e d ( m /s )
co nSce
2
40 40
4 0 .0 1
pm 1 0 co nc en tr ati on (
p m 10 c o nc en tr a tio n (
O n tr at ion (p p m )
1
20 20
0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
18 19 20 18 19 2 0
D us t St or m Da ys D u st Sto r m D ay s
of the aerosols as well as the concentration of (NO2) means that the wind speed is the main reason to dispersion
(CO) (SO2) as well as the temperature and wind speed. of polluted gases concentration, for this reason we studied
Drawing the relationships between the variables, the the effect of horizontal and vertical wind components on
relationship between the concentration of the aerosols the concentration of polluted gases by contour maps of
and the polluted gases was plotted as well as the wind components before, during and after the dust storm
relationship between the concentration of the aerosols as in Fig.s (6-a,b,c,d).
and the temperature and wind speed for the same days The Fig.s shows the absence of the effect of
and the result as shown in Fig.(5-a,b,c,d). horizontal and vertical wind speed components on the
Fig.s (5-a,b,c,d) shows the form that the concentration concentration of polluted gases and their values change
3674 Hazim H. Hussain Al-Saleem et al.
1 40 1 .6 1 40 0 .055
p m1 0 pm 10
c o no 2
1 20 0 .050
1 20 1 .4
)3
)3
0 .045
1 00 1 .2 1 00
g /m
m /m
0 .040
80 1 .0 80
0 .035
60 0 .8 60
0 .030
2
co cNeO
40 0 .6 40
0 .025
C O c o nc e n tr a tio n ( p p m )
pm 1 0 co n s e n tr a tio n (
p m 1 0 c on c e nt ra t io n (
nt ra t io n (p p m )
20 0 .4 20 0 .020
0 0 .2 0 0 .015
2 1 2 2 2 3 21 22 23
D u st S to r m D a y s D u st St o rm D ay s
14 0 0.0 5 1 40 38 6
pm 10 pm10
so2 T 36
12 0 1 20 W
5
0.0 4 34
)3
)3
10 0 1 00
g /m
g/ m
32 4
80 0.0 3 80
30
3
60 60 28
0.0 2
26 2
T em p er at ur e ( C)
40 40
n ce n t ra t io n ( p p m )
24
0.0 1
p m 1 0 co n c e nt r a tio n (
0 0.0 0 0 20 0
21 22 23 21 22 23
D u st S to r m Da y s Dus t St or m Da ys
)3
0 .045
100 1.2 10 0
g/ m
g /m
0 .040
80 1.0 80
0 .035
60 0.8 60
0 .030
co ncNO
2
40 0.6 40
0 .025
CO c o nc e nt ra t ion (p p m )
pm 1 0 c o nc e nt ra t ion (
p m 1 0 con ce n tr atio n (
en tr at ion ( pp m )
20 0.4 20 0 .020
0 0.2 0 0 .015
4 5 6 4 5 6
Du st St o rm Da y s D us t St or m Da ys
1 40 0 .0 5 14 0 30 6
pm 10 pm 1 0
s o2 T 29
1 20 12 0 W
0 .0 4 28 5
)3
1 00 10 0
mg
27
g/ m
0 .0 3 26 4
80 80
25
60
T (C)
60
0 .0 2 24 3
23
Wind sp ee d ( m/ s)
40
co n
2
40
S cOen t ra t io n ( p pm )
0 .0 1 22 2
pm 1 0 co n c e nt r at io n (
20 20
21
0 0 .0 0 0 20 1
4 5 6 4 5 6
D u st S to r m D a y s Du st St or m Days
14 0 1 .6 1 40 0.0 55
p m 10 p m1 0
co NO 2 0.0 50
12 0 1 .4 1 20
0.0 45
)3
)3
10 0 1 .2 1 00
g /m
g/m
0.0 40
80 1 .0 80
0.0 35
60 0 .8 60
0.0 30
co nNcO
2
40 0 .6 40
0.0 25
C O co n c e n tr a t io n ( p p m )
p m 1 0 c oc e n tr a ti on (
p m 1 0 co n c e n tr a ti o n (
e n tr a tio n (p p m )
20 0 .4 20 0.0 20
0 0 .2 0 0.0 15
3 4 5 3 4 5
D u s t S to r m D a y s D u s t S to r m D a ys
14 0 0.0 5 140 40 5
pm 10
SO2
12 0 120
0.0 4 38 4
)3
)3
10 0 100
g/ m
g/m
80 0.0 3 80 36 3
60 60
0.0 2 34 2
T em p er atu re ( C)
c o nc
W ind sp ee d (m /s)
2
40 40
SO
pm 10 c oce nt ra tion (
pm 10 co n ce n tr a tio n (
0.0 1 32 1
e n tr at io n ( p pm )
20 20 pm10
T
w
0 0.0 0 0 30 0
3 4 5 3 4 5
D us t Sto r m Da y s Du st St or m Day s
Before the dust storm During the dust storm After the dust storm
Before the dust storm During the dust storm After th e dust storm
Fig. 6b: Wind speed components for 22/3/2011 Dust Storm.
Before the dust storm During the dust storm After th e dust storm
Fig. 6c: Wind speed components for 5/4/2011 Dust Storm.
during the seasons as shown in Fig. 7. applies to all polluting gases as shown in Figs. (A, B, C),
The Fig. shows that the concentration of polluting that means that the concentration of polluting gases is
gases is greater during winter than in the summer, this inversely proportional with temperature as shown in Fig.
(E). The concentration of the aerosols in the dust storm
Air quality before, during, and after Dust storms in Baghdad, Iraq 3677
Before the dust storm During the dust storm After the dust storm
changes during the seasons depending on the source of the earth’s surface.
the storm and the areas passing through it as shown in After the dust storm passes, the concentration of the
fig. (D). This is due to the low wind speed in winter aerosol is reduced and the concentration of air pollutants
which works for the highest dispersion of contaminants increases due to the low wind speed, which leads to the
Fig. (F), where the numbers on X-axis refers to the accumulation of these pollutants near the surface of the
following: 1 (before dust storm), 2 (during dust storm), 3 earth, and the temperature rises again.
(after dust storm).
Reference
Conclusions Daly, A. and P. Zannetti (2007). “Ambient Air Pollution” 2nd Ed.,
Before the dust storm, the concentration of polluting published by the Arab School for Science and Technology
gases is high in the atmosphere due to traffic and industrial (ASST) and the Enviro Comp Institute, USA; 411.
activities, while the concentration of the aerosol is Hamidi, M. and M. Reza (2013). “Synoptic Analysis of Dust
relatively low. Storms in the Middle East”. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci.,
49(3) : 279-286.
During the dust storm, the concentration of the
aerosol increases due to weather system conditions in Hemond, H.F. and E. J. Fechner-Levy ( 2000). “Chemical Fate
and Transport the Environment”, 2nd. edition, Academic
the study area (low pressure system and blowing wind)
press, 290.
and the concentration of polluting gases decreases due
to the increasing in the speed of the wind that disperses Hussain, H.H. (2014). “The efficiency of local dust storm
particles as a cloud condensation nuclei”. Journal of
the pollutants, These polluting gases are absorbed by the
Mustansyriya University, 25(4): 165-174.
dust particles present in the atmosphere during the dust
storm and are then deposited to the earth’s surface by Guo, J.H. and K.A. Rahn (2004). “A mechanism for the increase
of pollution elements in dust storms in Beijing”.
gravity, which reduces the concentration of these gases
Atmospheric Environment, 38: 855-862.
in the atmosphere. Also the temperature decreases
Jacobson, M.Z. (2002). “Atmospheric Pollution History Science
because the dust acts to block the solar radiation reaching
3678 Hazim H. Hussain Al-Saleem et al.
0.055 1.8
Jan. Jan.
March March
0.050 1.6 A pr il
Apr il
July July
0.045
B 1.4 A
0.040 1.2
0.035 1.0
0.030 0.8
concent
2
0.6
CO concentration (ppm)
0.025
NOrat ion (ppm)
0.020 0.4
0.015 0.2
1 2 3 1 2 3
140 0.05
Jan. Jan.
March March
120 April A pril
0.04
July July
)3
100 D C
g/m
0.03
80
0.02
60
concentration
2 0.01
40
SO
pm10 concent rat ion (
20 0.00
(ppm)
0
1 2 3 1 2 3
Before , During & After Du st Sto rm Before, D uring & Af ter Dus t Storm
6 40
Ja n. Jan.
March March
5 April 35 Apr il
Ju ly July
F 30 E
4
25
3
20
2
Temperature (C)
Wind speed (m/s)
15
1
10
0 5
1 2 3 1 2 3
Be fore, D uring & Af ter D us t Sto rm Before, Durin g & Af ter Du st Sto rm
Fig. 7: Aerosol concentrations and contaminants before, during and after the storm.
and Regulations”. Cambridge university press, 412. pollution episodes in very stable nocturnal condition and
Fang, X., Y. Xie and L.J. Li ( 2003). “Effects of Dust storms on complex terrain using WRF-CHEM CO tracer model”,
the Air Pollution in Beijing”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Atmospheric Envionment,45: 27-69.
3: 93-101. Tiwary, A. and J. Collis (2010). “Air Pollution Measurements
Ning, D.T., L.X. Zhong and Y.Chung (1996). “Aerosol size modeling and mitigation”, 3rd edition, Routledge, 522.
distribution and elemental composition in urban areas of Warneck, P. ( 1999). “Chemistry of the natural atmosphere”, 2nd
northern China”. Atmospheric Environ., 30: 23-55. edition, Academic press, 927.
Saide E., Pablo, (2011). “Forecasting urban PM10 and PM2.5 Yang, K.L. (2002). “Spatial and seasonal variation of PM10
mass concentrations in Taiwan”. Atmospheric Environ.,
36: 11-34.