Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Esg Headline Metrics
Esg Headline Metrics
ID
c. E&S sector-relative product impact metrics (applicable from Backfilled history for E&S scores and percentiles
July 28, 2020, to November 2, 2021) is available for December 2011, December 2012,
December 2013, December 2014 and December
2. A company’s headline E&S sector-relative momentum 2015.This history makes certain assumptions
about the availability of underlying E&S data and
3. A company’s headline global and regional Governance (G) score assumes that data was available with a lag of one
year.
4. A company’s headline Controversy score Frequency
© Copyright 2021 Goldman Sachs. All rights reserved. Investors should consider the dataset as only a single factor in making their investment
decision. For other important disclosures go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. This dataset is intended for distribution to GS institutional
clients only.
GIR SUSTAIN ESG
HEADLINE METRICS
Contents Cont’d
E&S Numeric / Policy / Momentum Score
A company’s score for operational E&S subsector-
relative numeric / policy metrics
Usage
E&S Numeric / Policy / Momentum Percentile
In response to growing investor integration of analysis of ESG,
A percentile that captures a company’s operational Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research (GIR) provides the GS
E&S numeric / policy ranking within its subsector
SUSTAIN ESG data framework. Analyzing data from third-party ESG
G Score data providers and GIR equity analysts, the GIR SUSTAIN team has
A company’s score for G metrics relative to the entire identified what it believes to be the most relevant E&S exposures
ESG universe for a company's sector and G exposure relative to its region and
the global SUSTAIN ESG universe, as well as a company‘s Product
G Percentile
Alignment and potential Controversy exposure. These metrics form
A percentile that captures a company’s G ranking the framework through which to evaluate corporate ESG
relative to the entire ESG universe engagement. We caution at the outset that this data should not be
G Regional Score viewed as signaling ‘good’ or ‘bad’ ESG or overall performance.
A company’s score for G metrics within its region Instead, the framework highlights a company’s peer-relative
performance on the key ESG metrics that the team believes to be
G Regional Percentile the most relevant for that sector as a basis for further analysis.
A percentile that captures a company’s G ranking
relative to its region-relative metrics GIR has published various reports related to ESG which can be
found on the GS SUSTAIN page on the research portal.
Controversy Score
A company’s score for controversy metrics
Controversy Percentile
An aggregate percentile that captures a company’s
controversy ranking
Product Alignment Category
A categorization that helps assess how a company’s
products and services impact consumers,
communities, and the environment in the use-phase
and at end-of-life.
Transition Plan Transparency Percentage
A company's absolute score for disclosures,
integration, and reporting quality across climate
transition strategy metrics, expressed as a percentage
of the maximum achievable Climate Transition Plan
Transparency score
Transition Performance Percentage
A company's sector-relative score for performance on
metrics relating to emissions profile trends and green
business exposures, expressed as a percentage of the
highest Climate Transition Performance score
achieved by a company within the same GS SUSTAIN
sector.
© Copyright 2021 Goldman Sachs. All rights reserved. Investors should consider the dataset as only a single factor in making their investment
decision. For other important disclosures go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. This dataset is intended for distribution to GS institutional
clients only.