Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioethics Transes Prelims
Bioethics Transes Prelims
MORALS
UNPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS
Philosophical and Theological
Abortion doing by physician
Will
misbehave as to standards of their
Phenomena
profession.
Professional Ethics
Bakit nagkakaroon ng misbehavior?
Behavior
Induced into doing these things
More on emotions
at the guides of health team
The realm of what we do is more
people
on emotions
The problem is in implementation
ARISTOTLE When we do our practice, that’s where
the problem is.
Hippocratic code
“Follow what I tell you, but don’t follow
what I do.”
BIOETHICS Contrary to morals and law
Principle of double-effect
Encompasses the very practice of
health
Found in modern curriculum RES IPSA LOQUITUR
Because of the discrepancy of
The principle that the occurrence of an
Ethics and Morals
accident implies negligence
Prevent commercialism (money) in
medical practice
Give us the rules/guide how to take
care of our patients.
Nursing is actually a practice from
womb to tomb.
No exact answer
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE HUMAN ACTS
2. FREEDOM
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE • You do it or you don’t
The principle of
Beneficence and
Non-maleficence
Reminds us to always observe,
in order to prevent injury
If there’s injury, there’s
negligence or malpractice
CONSENT
I will not administer lethal drugs Prioritize the welfare of the patient
Means bad
NON-MALO
Means good
AUTONOMY
Not voluntary /
involuntary
P+A
You're not able to
see what's right or
wrong it led to
something more
intense.
It is because of your
heightened
emotions that led
you to committing a
particular act.
When in doubt,
don't act
OMISSION ACT WITH FEAR (may takot)
Acts done with fear
We failed to do
Full responsibility
Natural forgetting
Still ginawa mo yung act
Intentional forgetting
No consent
ACT OUT OF FEAR (dahil sa takot)
Acts done out of fear
COMMISSION Voluntary
Not responsible
We have committed (ginawa natin)
Presence of fear
Choices are reduced
Kasi nanaig ang takot
FEAR
Disturbance of the mind due to
threatening evil CIRCUMSTANCES
Mind
W’s questions
Abstract concept
Object used
Shrinking back of the mind.
Intent
Due to impending evil
St. Thomas Aquinas
Can the mind shrink? 1. EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES
Yes, mind is an abstract Erases responsibility of the person
concept. Not totally free (age)
It is when you see someone who Circumstance of age
is afraid.
Bahag ang buntot
What does not shrink? Brain 2. AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Circumstance of time
3. MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Reduces responsibility
NORMS / ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
INTENT
TWO SOURCES OF HUMAN ACTS
1. LAW Gives color to the act
Pinipirmahan ng President
CONGRESS
Group of monkeys
SITUATIONAL ETHICS
OTHERS
The end doesn't justify the means.
The end is always good. • There’s always the Element of intent
Older woman who is brain dead (low Yes, driven by emotion of love.
External Norm
2. Conscience Law is an ordinance of reason
Meaning
▪ Civil Law
➔ Enacted by state 3. From the standpoint of the MODE OF
PROMULGATION
▪ Ponere laws
▪ Cannon Law
➔ To put
Commandments of the
➔ To place an object
church
down somewhere
➔ To publish or put
down into writing
↳ Laws that are made known or
promulgated in terms of writing
• Civil
CONSCIENCE
↳ Civil human positive laws
Practical judgment of reason
▪ Congressional statutes and
According to philosophy
Presidential decrees
Conscience is the practical judgment
or reason
INNER VOICE
Negative law
↳ Mandatory or prohibited laws ☀ According to St. Augustine
reason?
Conscience that operates before a to kick in before the act was done.
Ex: When we have done Only black and white, only good or bad.
Absolutism
Determinism Consequentialism and Utilitarianism
Emotivism
↳ Jeremy Bentham
Intuitionism
↳ John Stuart Mill
Libertarianism
Naturalism
Objectivism
Contractarian Ethics
Prescriptivism
Religion ↳ John Rawls
Morality
Subjectivism
Causistry IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804)
action or rule.
Put focus on the rightness or
Morals Proper
wrongness of actions as such;
therefore, not interested in the Rational part
consequences of those actions.
Opposite of both teleological and
Ethics
consequential ethical theories since
both emphasize the rightness or the Both as empirical and rational
wrongness of certain actions based on
their consequences.
Morality
Basis is reason,
Purely rational,
Priori (demonstration)
Basis of morality is nothing else, but
reason.
Reason Formal
Not the terminal point of life; rather, Logic; when limited to the definite
It leads to the cultivation objects of understanding, it is
of the good will. metaphysics.
Capable of influencing the will.
➔ Good will
Will ➔ Motive
Kantian Ethics
Makes duty absolute and unconditional
Man acts morally because it is his duty
That is why he calls his
to be moral.
brand of morality,
↳ Categorical Imperative
Perfect Duty
↳ Because it is a
priori (demonstration)
PRIMA FACIE
Conditional duties
Apodictic practical principle ↳ not absolute duties
It appears that an action is objectively In legal parlance – at first sight, on the
necessary without regard to an end. face of it
Declares an action to be Can be overridden by other Prima
objectively necessary in itself, Facie depending on a given
without reference to any purpose. circumstance.
Conditional duties that arise in the
context of relation.
The Principle of Universality ↳ These duties are products of
Kant
Ross
↳ Supernatural Virtues
↳ Faith, Hope and Love
Will help man to attain beatific vision.
A salvific state where humans have a
face-to-face contact with God.
NATURAL LAW CONSEQUENTIALISM / UTILITARIANISM
Relativism
FOUR SANCTIONS
1. Physical
2. Political;
3. Moral or Popular
4. Religious
FOUR SANCTIONS SEVEN CIRCUMSTANCES OF HEDONIC
CALCULUS
Physical Sanction
1. Intensity
Keeps sensual pleasures within the
Human person is caught up in the
bounds of morality,
crossroad of two pleasures.
For man to reduce his/her intemperate
Bentham wants humans to take that
(lack of self-control) pleasure or
pleasure which constitutes the higher
overindulgence (too much of
degree.
something) through painful experience.
2. Duration
Political Sanction Leads humans to choose for that
Leads the laws of the land to restrict pleasure which has a longer effect.
➔ "Happiness"
Pleasure (Bentham's model)
Gives much focus only in the
quantitative value of pleasure, Happiness (Mill's model).
including pain.
Mill added some qualitative values of
pleasure and take them as the CONTRACTARIAN ETHICS
identifying marks of his ethical theory. Anchored on a political philosophy
Mill takes Bentham's construct on ↳ Social contract.
happiness, and placed much weight on Social contact is forged both by the
the qualitative aspect of pleasure. government and its subjects or
Pleasure is not the only good. citizens.
Pleasure cannot be absolutely qualified The authority of the government is
as the greatest good. premised in an agreement between the
Some pleasures are more valuable Ruler (the government) and the
than others. Ruled (the subjects or the citizens)
Mill meant by the qualitative difference ↳ In which the ruler agrees to
in pleasure. provide order in return for
Mill emphasizes that the qualitative obedience of the ruled
value of pleasure should be given more
importance than the quantitative value.
It is the quality, not the quantity, of
pleasure that matters.
Bentham who puts much importance to
pleasure, Mill rather prefers happiness
to pleasure.
This made Mill the exponent of the
theory called "the greatest happiness
to the greatest degree."
This, in Millian utilitarianism is
expressed as "the greatest happiness
to the greatest number of people."