Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRPC Notes Nmims
CRPC Notes Nmims
CRPC Notes Nmims
There are various functionaries under the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 who help to regulate
the various provisions of the code. The functionaries are essential for the proper functioning of
the code. The various functionaries mentioned under the code are the Police, Public Prosecutors,
Assistant Public Prosecutors, Additional Prosecutors, Prison authorities and the Defence counsel.
The powers and functions of the functionaries are clearly mentioned in the code.
The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is a procedural law in India that outlines the rules and
regulations to be followed during the investigation, inquiry, and trial of criminal offenses. It
defines the powers and duties of criminal courts and lays down the procedures to be followed by
the police and the judiciary.
The criminal courts have the power to conduct trials, inquire into offenses, issue warrants,
summon witnesses, and make judgments. The jurisdiction of each court depends on the severity
of the offense, the place of occurrence, and the status of the accused.
Basic Concepts:
1. Bailable Offence: An offense that is listed as bailable under the law, and the accused can
be released on bail after furnishing the necessary surety.
2. Non-Bailable Offence: An offense that is not listed as bailable under the law, and the
accused cannot be released on bail unless the court permits.
3. Cognizable Offence: An offense that can be investigated and arrested without a warrant
by the police.
4. Non-Cognizable Offence: An offense that cannot be investigated or arrested without a
warrant by the police.
5. Complaint: A written statement submitted to a magistrate or a police officer, alleging that
an offense has been committed.
6. Charge: A formal accusation made by the prosecution against the accused in a court of
law.
7. Police Report: A report submitted by the police to the magistrate, informing about the
commission of an offense and the progress of the investigation.
8. Investigation: The process of collecting evidence by the police to prove the guilt or
innocence of the accused.
9. Inquiry and Trial: The process of examining evidence and conducting proceedings in a
court of law to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.
10. Summons Case: A case in which the accused is summoned to appear in court to answer
the charges.
11. Warrant Case: A case in which the accused is arrested and produced before the court.
UNDER THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (CRPC) OF INDIA, THE ESSENTIALS
OF ARREST CAN BE CATEGORIZED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Legal Authority:
Arrest must be carried out by a person with legal authority (e.g., a police officer or a person
authorized by a court order).
2. Apprehension of a person:
The act of arrest involves the actual apprehension or restraint of a person's movement to make
them subject to the law.
3. Accused or Suspect:
An arrest can only be made if the person being arrested is accused of or suspected of committing
a crime.
4. Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses:
In cognizable offenses, a police officer can arrest without a warrant. For non-cognizable
offenses, a warrant is required.
5. Arrest with Warrant:
An arrest warrant is a legal document issued by a competent court, directing the arrest of the
person mentioned in it.
6. Arrest without Warrant:
In specific situations, a police officer can arrest a person without a warrant (e.g., if the person
commits a cognizable offense in the presence of a police officer).
7. Procedure of Arrest:
The person conducting the arrest must follow the proper procedure, such as informing the
arrested person of the grounds for arrest, the right to bail (if applicable), and producing the
arrested person before a magistrate within 24 hours.
8. Use of Force:
The arresting officer can use reasonable force if necessary to arrest a person who resists arrest or
tries to escape.
9. Rights of the Arrested Person:
The arrested person has certain rights, such as the right to know the grounds of arrest, the right to
legal representation, and the right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours.
10. Documentation:
The arrest must be properly documented, including the time, date, and reason for the arrest, as
well as the arrested person's personal information.
1. Classification of Offenses:
Bail is primarily granted for bailable and non-bailable offenses. Bailable offenses allow
for a person to be released on bail as a matter of right, whereas non-bailable offenses
require the discretion of the court.
2. Application for Bail:
The accused or their legal representative must submit a bail application to the relevant
court.
3. Judicial Discretion:
For non-bailable offenses, the court exercises its discretion in granting bail, considering
factors such as the gravity of the offense, the accused's past criminal record, the risk of
tampering with evidence, and the likelihood of the accused absconding.
4. Bail Conditions:
The court may impose specific conditions when granting bail, such as reporting to the
police station at specified intervals, not leaving the jurisdiction without permission, and
not tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
5. Bail Amount:
The court determines the bail amount, which must be reasonable and not excessive. The
accused or a surety must deposit the bail amount as a guarantee that the accused will
comply with the bail conditions and appear in court as required.
6. Sureties:
The court may require the accused to provide one or more sureties who vouch for the
accused's compliance with the bail conditions. The sureties may be required to deposit a
specified amount as a guarantee.
7. Anticipatory Bail:
In some cases, a person may apply for anticipatory bail if they have reason to believe that
they may be arrested on false or trumped-up charges for a non-bailable offense. The court
may grant anticipatory bail at its discretion, subject to specific conditions.
8. Bail during Trial and Appeal:
Bail may be granted during the trial or pending an appeal, depending on the
circumstances and the discretion of the court.
9. Cancellation or Revocation of Bail:
The court may cancel or revoke bail if the accused violates any bail conditions or if new
evidence emerges that warrants the cancellation of bail.
10. Right to Legal Representation:
The accused has the right to legal representation when applying for bail and throughout
the bail process.
Unit 3: Initiation of Criminal Case
Section 155: Information as to Non Cognizable Cases and Investigation of Such Cases
outlines the process for handling non-cognizable cases by police officers:
● When information is given to a police officer about a non-cognizable offence, they shall
record the substance of the information in a book as prescribed by the State Government
and refer the informant to the Magistrate.
● No police officer can investigate a non-cognizable case without the order of a Magistrate
having power to try such case or commit the case for trial.
● Any police officer receiving such order may exercise the same powers in respect of the
investigation (except the power to arrest without warrant) as an officer in charge of a
police station may exercise in a cognizable case.
● If a case relates to two or more offences, of which at least one is cognizable, the case
shall be deemed to be a cognizable case, even if the other offences are non-cognizable.
● A police officer in charge of a police station can investigate a cognizable case without the
order of a Magistrate.
● The officer can investigate any case that a local court in that area would have the power
to inquire into or try under Chapter XIII.
● No one can question the police officer's proceedings in such a case on the grounds that
the officer did not have the power to investigate it.
● A Magistrate empowered under section 190 can order an investigation in such a case.
● During an investigation, a police officer can require anyone who knows about the case to
come and give information.
● The officer can make a written order requiring that person to come to the police station.
● If the person is a male below 15 years of age, above 65 years of age, or a woman or a
physically or mentally challenged person, they cannot be forced to go to a place other
than where they live.
● The State Government can make rules to decide how much money the police officer must
pay to anyone who has to go to a place other than their home to provide information.
Section 161: Examination of Witnesses by the Police
● A police officer or an officer of a certain rank as prescribed by the State Government may
orally examine any person who is believed to have knowledge about the case being
investigated.
● The person being examined is obligated to answer truthfully, except for questions that
could incriminate them.
● The police officer may record the statement made by the person during the examination
and keep a separate and accurate record of each statement.
● Statements made during the examination may also be recorded by audio-video electronic
means, as provided in the proviso.
● No statement made by any person to a police officer during an investigation under this
Chapter, if reduced to writing, shall be signed by the person making it.
● Such statement or any record of it shall not be used for any purpose, except as provided
in this section, at any inquiry or trial related to the offense under investigation at the time
when such statement was made.
● Any witness called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been
reduced to writing may have any part of his statement used by the accused or, with the
permission of the court, by the prosecution to contradict the witness in the manner
provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
● Any part of the statement used may also be used in the re-examination of such witness,
but only for the purpose of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
● This section does not apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of
section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 or affect the provisions of section 27 of that
Act.
● An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1)
may amount to contradiction if it appears significant and relevant to the context, and
whether it amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.
163. No inducement to be offered.
● No police officer or person in authority can offer or make any inducement, threat, or
promise mentioned in Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
● No police officer or person can prevent any person from making a statement of their own
free will during an investigation under this chapter, by caution or any other means.
1. If an investigation involves a rape or attempted rape case, and there is a need to conduct a
medical examination of the woman who was allegedly raped or attempted to be raped, the
examination must be performed by a registered medical practitioner. The practitioner
must be employed in a hospital run by the Government or a local authority. In the
absence of such a practitioner, any other registered medical practitioner may conduct the
examination with the woman's consent or the consent of a person authorized to provide
consent on her behalf. The woman must be taken to the registered medical practitioner
within twenty-four hours of receiving the information related to the commission of the
offense.
2. The registered medical practitioner must promptly examine the woman's body and
prepare a report of the examination, including the following details:
I. the woman's name, address, and the name of the person who brought her;
II. the woman's age;
III. the material taken from her body for DNA profiling;
IV. any marks of injury found on her body;
V. the woman's overall mental condition; and
VI. any other relevant particulars in reasonable detail.
3. The report must clearly state the reasons for each conclusion arrived at.
4. The report must explicitly state that the woman or the authorized person's consent to the
examination was obtained.
5. The exact time of the beginning and completion of the examination must be noted in the
report.
6. The registered medical practitioner must promptly forward the report to the investigating
officer, who must send it to the Magistrate referred to in section 173 as part of the
documents referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (5) of that section.
7. This section does not authorize any examination without the woman's or authorized
person's consent.
● If a person is arrested and detained in custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot
be completed within 24 hours, the officer in charge of the police station or the police
officer making the investigation must transmit a copy of the case diary to the nearest
Judicial Magistrate and forward the accused to such Magistrate.
● The Magistrate may authorize the detention of the accused in custody for a term not
exceeding 15 days in total. If the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit
it for trial, they may order the accused to be forwarded to a Magistrate having such
jurisdiction.
● The Magistrate may authorize the detention of the accused beyond 15 days if adequate
grounds exist for doing so, but the total period of detention cannot exceed 90 days for
offences punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or 60 days for other offences.
After the specified period, the accused person must be released on bail if they are
prepared to furnish bail.
● The accused must be produced before the Magistrate in person for the first time and
subsequently every time until they are released from police custody. The Magistrate may
extend further detention in judicial custody on the production of the accused either in
person or through the medium of electronic video linkage.
● No Magistrate of the second class, not specially empowered in this regard by the High
Court, shall authorize detention in the custody of the police.
● If a woman under 18 years of age is detained, the detention shall be authorized to be in
the custody of a remand home or recognized social institution.
● If a Judicial Magistrate is not available, the officer in charge of the police station or the
police officer making the investigation may transmit a copy of the case diary to the
nearest Executive Magistrate, who may authorize the detention of the accused for a term
not exceeding 7 days in the aggregate. The accused person shall be released on bail after
the expiry of the authorized detention period, except where an order for further detention
has been made by a Magistrate competent to make such an order.
● A Magistrate authorizing detention in the custody of the police must record the reasons
for doing so in writing, and the record must be signed by the Magistrate. The accused
must also be informed of their right to apply for bail.
● Any Magistrate other than the Chief Judicial Magistrate must send a copy of their order
and reasons to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
● If a case is triable by a Magistrate as a summons-case and the investigation is not
concluded within six months from the date of arrest, the Magistrate must make an order
stopping further investigation, unless the officer making the investigation can prove that
continuing the investigation is necessary for special reasons and in the interests of justice.
● If an order stopping further investigation has been made under sub-section (5), the
Sessions Judge can vacate the order and direct further investigation into the offence,
subject to specified directions regarding bail and other matters.
● If the accused is released on bail, they must comply with the conditions of the bail bond,
and failure to do so may result in their arrest.
describes the procedure that police officers must follow after completing an investigation.
● Sub-section (1) requires that every investigation under this chapter must be completed
without unnecessary delay. Sub-section (1A) specifies that the investigation in relation to
certain offenses under sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB,
or 376E of the Indian Penal Code must be completed from the date on which the
information was recorded by the officer in charge of the police station.
● If the investigation relates to an offense under sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C,
376D, 376DA, 376DB, or 376E, the report of the medical examination of the woman
must be attached.
● Subsection 2(i) As soon as it is completed, the officer in charge of the police station shall
forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report,
a report in the form prescribed by the State Government, stating—
○ (a) the names of the parties;
○ (b) the nature of the information;
○ (c) the names of the persons who appear to be acquainted with the circumstances
of the case;
○ (d) whether any offence appears to have been committed and, if so, by whom;
○ (e) whether the accused has been arrested;
○ (f) whether he has been released on his bond and, if so, whether with or without
sureties;
○ (g) whether he has been forwarded in custody under section 170.
● Sub-section (2)(ii) requires the officer to communicate the action taken by him to the
person by whom the information relating to the offense was first given.
● Sub-section (3) specifies that where a superior officer of police has been appointed under
section 158, the report shall be submitted through that officer if so directed by the State
Government.
● Sub-section (4) requires the Magistrate to make an order for the discharge of the bond or
otherwise if the accused has been released on bond.
● Sub-section (5) requires the police officer to forward to the Magistrate all relevant
documents and statements recorded under section 161 of all the persons whom the
prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses.
● Sub-section (6) specifies that if the police officer finds any part of a statement to be
irrelevant or its disclosure to the accused is not essential in the interests of justice and is
inexpedient in the public interest, he shall indicate that part of the statement and append a
note requesting the Magistrate to exclude that part from the copies granted to the accused.
● Sub-section (7) allows the police officer to furnish the accused with copies of any
relevant documents.
● Finally, sub-section (8) provides for further investigation in respect of an offense even
after a report has been forwarded to the Magistrate, and requires the officer in charge of
the police station to forward a further report regarding any new evidence obtained during
the investigation.
● This section relates to the inquiry into the cause of death of a person.
● If the case is of a certain nature (referred to in sub-section 3), the nearest Magistrate
empowered to hold inquests must conduct an inquiry.
● In other cases (mentioned in sub-section 1 of section 174), any Magistrate so empowered
may hold an inquiry into the cause of death either instead of, or in addition to, the police
investigation.
● If a person dies or disappears while in police custody or rape is alleged to have been
committed on a woman in custody, an inquiry must be held by the Judicial or
Metropolitan Magistrate within the local jurisdiction.
● The Magistrate holding the inquiry must record the evidence taken in connection with the
case in the prescribed manner.
● If the Magistrate considers it necessary to examine the dead body of the person who has
already been interred, they may cause the body to be disinterred and examined.
● Where possible, the Magistrate must inform the relatives of the deceased and allow them
to remain present at the inquiry.
● If an inquiry or investigation is held under sub-section 1A, the body must be forwarded to
the nearest Civil Surgeon or other qualified medical person appointed by the State
Government within 24 hours of the person's death, unless it's not possible to do so for
reasons to be recorded in writing.
Unit 4: Stage of Investigation
● When a person is arrested and being interrogated by the police, they have the right to
meet with an advocate of their choice during interrogation.
● The person may not have the advocate present throughout the entire interrogation, but
they must be allowed to meet with them at some point during the interrogation process.
Section 50: Person arrested to be informed of grounds of arrest and of right to bail.
1. When a person is arrested without a warrant, the police officer or other person making the
arrest must immediately inform them of the full details of the offence or other reasons for
the arrest.
2. If a police officer arrests a person without a warrant for a bailable offence, they must
inform the person that they have the right to be released on bail and that they may arrange
for sureties on their behalf.
Section 50A. Obligation of the person making the arrest to inform about the arrest, etc., to
a nominated person.
1. Every police officer or other person making any arrest under this Code shall forthwith
give the information regarding such arrest and place where the arrested person is being
held to any of his friends, relatives or such other persons as may be disclosed or
nominated by the arrested person for the purpose of giving such information.
2. The police officer shall inform the arrested person of his rights under sub-section (1) as
soon as he is brought to the police station.
3. An entry of the fact as to who has been informed of the arrest of such person shall be
made in a book to be kept in the police station in such form as may be prescribed in this
behalf by the State Government.
4. It shall be the duty of the Magistrate before whom such arrested person is produced, to
satisfy himself that the requirements of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) have been
complied with in respect of such arrested person.
Section 52: power of the arresting officer to seize any offensive weapon from the person
being arrested:
● The officer or person making the arrest can take away any offensive weapon found on the
arrested person.
● The officer or person making the arrest must deliver all such weapons to the Court or the
officer who requires the production of the arrested person as per the Code.
Section 53: Examination of accused by medical practitioner at the request of police officer
1. When a person is arrested for an offense and there are reasonable grounds for believing
that an examination of his person will provide evidence of the offense, a registered
medical practitioner at the request of a police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector,
can make an examination of the person arrested.
2. Such an examination may be made by a female medical practitioner in the case of a
female arrestee.
3. The medical practitioner can use necessary force to conduct the examination.
4. The examination can include the examination of blood, blood stains, semen, swabs in
case of sexual offences, sputum and sweat, hair samples and finger nail clippings by the
use of modern and scientific techniques including DNA profiling and other tests which
the registered medical practitioner thinks necessary in a particular case.
5. A registered medical practitioner is a medical practitioner who possesses any medical
qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
(102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a State Medical Register.
Section 53A of the Criminal Procedure Code pertains to the examination of a person
accused of rape or an attempt to commit rape.
● When a person is arrested for such an offence, a registered medical practitioner employed
in a government or locally run hospital, or any other registered medical practitioner
within a 16-kilometer radius, can be requested by a police officer of sub-inspector rank to
examine the accused person.
● The registered medical practitioner and any person acting under their direction can use
reasonable force to conduct the examination, which should be done without delay.
● The registered medical practitioner conducting the examination must prepare a report,
including the accused person's name, age, marks of injury (if any), description of material
taken from the person for DNA profiling, and other relevant details in reasonable detail.
● The report should state precisely the reasons for each conclusion arrived at, and the exact
time of commencement and completion of the examination should be noted.
● The registered medical practitioner must forward the report without delay to the
investigating officer, who will forward it to the Magistrate as part of the documents
referred to in section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Section 55:
● Allows a police officer to delegate the power to arrest without a warrant to a subordinate
officer through a written order
● The order must specify the person to be arrested, the offense or cause for the arrest, and
the officer required to make the arrest
● The officer making the arrest must inform the person being arrested of the substance of
the order and show the order if requested
● This section does not affect the power of a police officer to make an arrest under section
41
Section 55A:
Places a duty on the person who has custody of an accused person to take reasonable care of their
health and safety.
Section 56:
Requires a police officer who arrests a person without a warrant to take or send the person
arrested, without delay and subject to bail provisions, before a Magistrate who has jurisdiction in
the case or before the officer in charge of a police station.
Section 57:
● Prohibits a police officer from detaining a person arrested without a warrant for a longer
period than what is reasonable under the circumstances of the case.
● The maximum period of detention, excluding the time needed to travel from the place of
arrest to the Magistrate’s Court, is 24 hours, unless there is a special order from a
Magistrate under section 167.
Section 60:
Allows a person in lawful custody to immediately pursue and re-arrest the person who has
escaped or has been rescued
Section 47 applies to such arrests even if the person making the arrest is not a police officer or is
not acting under a warrant
Section 60A:
Specifies that no arrest shall be made except in accordance with the provisions of the Code or
any other law in force for the time being
Section 166: When officer in charge of police station may require another to issue
search-warrant.
● An officer in charge of a police station or a police officer not below the rank of
sub-inspector can request an officer in charge of another police station to conduct a
search in any place within the limits of the requesting officer's station.
● The officer who receives the request must conduct the search according to the procedures
mentioned in Section 165 and send any items found to the requesting officer.
● If the delay caused by requesting another officer to conduct the search could result in
evidence being destroyed, the requesting officer can search any place within the limits of
another police station without waiting for permission.
● Any officer conducting such a search must immediately inform the officer in charge of
the police station within whose limits the searched place is situated and send copies of the
search records to the nearest Magistrate who is authorized to take cognizance of the
offense.
● The owner or occupier of the searched place can obtain a free copy of the records sent to
the Magistrate upon application.
Unit 5: Bail
Section 436:
● Applies when a person (other than a person accused of a non-bailable offence) is arrested
or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station, or appears or is
brought before a court.
● Such a person shall be released on bail if he is prepared to give bail at any time while in
custody or at any stage of the proceeding.
● The officer or court may discharge the person on his executing a bond without sureties
instead of taking bail, if he is indigent and unable to furnish surety.
● The explanation to this section states that if a person is unable to give bail within a week
of his arrest, he shall be presumed to be an indigent person for the purpose of this
provision.
● Nothing in this section shall affect the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 116 or
section 446A.
● If a person granted bail fails to comply with the conditions of the bail bond as regards
time and place of attendance, the court may refuse to release him on bail when he appears
before the court on a subsequent occasion in the same case.
Section 436A:
● Applies when a person has undergone detention for a period of up to one-half of the
maximum period of imprisonment specified for the offence under investigation, inquiry,
or trial.
● Such a person shall be released by the court on his personal bond with or without
sureties, provided that the offence is not one for which the punishment of death has been
specified.
● The court may order the continued detention of such person for a longer period or release
him on bail instead of the personal bond with or without sureties after hearing the public
prosecutor and recording the reasons in writing.
● No person shall be detained during the period of investigation, inquiry, or trial for more
than the maximum period of imprisonment provided for the offence under the law.
● The explanation to the section clarifies that the period of detention passed due to delay
caused by the accused shall be excluded while computing the period of detention under
this section for granting bail.
Section 437
1. Any person accused of or suspected of committing a non-bailable offense may be
released on bail if arrested without a warrant by an officer in charge of a police station or
brought before a court other than the High Court or Court of session.
2. The accused shall not be released on bail if reasonable grounds exist for believing that
he/she has committed an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment.
3. The accused shall not be released on bail if the offense is cognizable and the accused has
previously been convicted of an offense punishable by death, life imprisonment, or
imprisonment for seven years or more.
4. However, the court may direct that a person referred to in clauses (i) or (ii) be released on
bail if the person is under sixteen years of age, is a woman, or is sick or infirm.
5. The court may also direct that a person referred to in clause (ii) be released on bail if it is
satisfied that it is just and proper to do so for any other special reason.
6. The court cannot refuse to grant bail solely because the accused may be required for
identification by witnesses during the investigation.
7. No person accused of an offense punishable by death, life imprisonment, or
imprisonment for seven years or more can be released on bail by the court under this
section without giving an opportunity of hearing to the public prosecutor.
8. If it appears to the officer or court at any stage of the investigation, inquiry, or trial that
there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has committed a
non-bailable offense, but that there are sufficient grounds for further inquiry into his/her
guilt, the accused shall be released on bail subject to the provisions of section 446A.
9. When a person accused or suspected of committing an offense punishable with
imprisonment of seven years or more is released on bail, the court shall impose certain
conditions, including attending in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed
under this chapter, not committing a similar offense, and not tampering with evidence.
10. The court may also impose other conditions it considers necessary in the interests of
justice.
11. The officer or court releasing any person on bail under this section shall record in writing
his/her reasons for doing so.
12. Any court that has released a person on bail under this section may, if necessary, direct
that the person be arrested and committed to custody.
13. If the trial of a person accused of a non-bailable offense is not concluded within sixty
days from the first date fixed for taking evidence in the case, the person shall be released
on bail to the satisfaction of the magistrate, unless the magistrate directs otherwise in
writing.
14. If, after the conclusion of the trial of a person accused of a non-bailable offense and
before judgment is delivered, the court is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds
for believing that the accused is not guilty of any such offense, it shall release the accused
on the execution of a bond without sureties for his/her appearance to hear judgment
delivered.
Section 438
● Provides for the grant of anticipatory bail to a person who has reason to believe that they
may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence.
● The person can apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under this
section, and the court may direct that in the event of such arrest, the person shall be
released on bail.
● The High Court or the Court of Session may also impose certain conditions on the
person, such as making themselves available for interrogation by a police officer, not
making any inducement or threat to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, and
not leaving India without the previous permission of the court.
● If the person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police
station on such accusation and is prepared to give bail, he shall be released on bail.
● If a Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should be issued,
he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the direction of the Court under
sub-section (1).
● However, it's important to note that this section does not apply to cases involving the
arrest of any person on an accusation of having committed an offence under sub-section
(3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Section 439: special powers of a High Court or Court of Session regarding bail.
● The section provides that a High Court or Court of Session may direct that any person
accused of an offence and in custody be released on bail, and may impose any condition
it considers necessary for the purposes mentioned in sub-section (3) of section 437, which
deals with the conditions for the grant of bail.
● The court may also set aside or modify any condition imposed by a Magistrate when
releasing a person on bail.
● The court must provide notice of the bail application to the Public Prosecutor before
granting bail to a person accused of an offense that is triable exclusively by the Court of
Session or punishable with life imprisonment. The court can choose to skip this notice if
it finds it impractical, but it must record its reasons in writing.
● Finally, the High Court or Court of Session may also direct that any person who has been
released on bail under this Chapter be arrested and committed to custody.
GENERAL
Grant of Bail:
Under Section 437 and 439 of the CrPC, the courts have the power to grant bail to an accused
person. Bail can be granted at any stage of the criminal proceedings, before or after conviction,
provided certain conditions are met. The court may grant bail on the following conditions:
1. The accused must provide a surety or security bond
2. The accused must surrender his passport or any other travel documents
3. The accused must not leave the country without the court's permission
4. The accused must not interfere with the witnesses or tamper with the evidence
5. The accused must cooperate with the investigation
6. The accused must not commit any similar offence while on bail.
Anticipatory Bail:
Under Section 438 of the CrPC, an accused person can apply for anticipatory bail if he
apprehends arrest. Anticipatory bail is granted by the court to prevent the accused person from
being arrested. The conditions for anticipatory bail are similar to those of regular bail. The court
may grant anticipatory bail on the following conditions:
1. The accused must cooperate with the investigation
2. The accused must not leave the country without the court's permission
3. The accused must not interfere with the witnesses or tamper with the evidence
4. The accused must not commit any similar offence while on bail.
Cancellation of Bail:
Under Section 439(2) of the CrPC, the court has the power to cancel bail granted to an accused
person. If the accused person violates any of the conditions of the bail, the court may cancel the
bail and send him back to custody.
Compulsory Release:
Under Section 436A of the CrPC, an undertrial prisoner who has already undergone the
maximum period of imprisonment for the offence he is accused of, is entitled to be released on
bail. However, this provision is subject to certain conditions.
COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES
COMPLAINTS TO MAGISTRATES
Section 209 Commitment of case to Court of Session when offense is triable exclusively by
it
● The Magistrate shall comply with the provisions of Section 207 or Section 208, as the
case may be, and then commit the case to the Court of Session.
● The accused may be remanded to custody until the commitment is made, subject to the
provisions of the Code relating to bail.
● The accused may be remanded to custody during the trial, subject to the provisions of the
Code relating to bail.
● The Magistrate shall send the record of the case and the documents and articles, if any,
which are to be produced in evidence, to the Court of Session.
● The Magistrate shall notify the Public Prosecutor of the commitment of the case to the
Court of Session.
Section 210: complaint case and a police investigation for the same offence.
● If the Magistrate conducting an inquiry or trial in the complaint case becomes aware of
the police investigation, they shall stop the proceedings and ask the police officer for a
report.
● If the police report identifies any accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate will hear
both cases together.
● If the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate
will continue the inquiry or trial of the complaint case.
CHARGES
Section 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in India outlines what should be included in a
charge, which is a formal accusation against someone for committing a crime. The key points
are:
1. The charge should clearly state the offence.
2. If there is a specific name for the offence, it should be used.
3. If there is no specific name, enough information should be provided to give the accused
notice of the matter.
4. The law and section of the law should be mentioned.
5. The charge being made means all legal requirements for the offence have been fulfilled.
6. The charge should be written in the language of the court.
7. If the accused has a previous conviction that can affect the punishment, it must be stated
in the charge. If it is not, it can still be added before sentencing.
Section 212 of the Code of Criminal Procedure outlines what particulars are required to be
included in a charge.
● The charge should contain details regarding the time, place, and person or thing involved
in the alleged offence.
● The particulars provided should be enough to give the accused notice of the matter with
which they are being charged.
● If the accused is charged with criminal breach of trust or dishonest misappropriation of
property, it is enough to specify the gross sum or a description of the property in question,
along with the dates of the alleged offence.
● The charge should not necessarily specify particular items or exact dates, and the time
between the first and last date should not exceed one year.
Section 213 applies when the details provided in Sections 211 and 212 are not sufficient to give
the accused proper notice of the matter with which they are charged.
● In such cases, the charge must contain additional particulars regarding the manner in
which the alleged offence was committed.
● These particulars should be sufficient to give the accused a clear understanding of the
specific charges against them.
● For example, in a theft case, the charge should provide details of how the theft was
committed, such as whether it involved breaking and entering or the use of force or
threats.
● The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that the accused is fully informed of the
charges against them and can prepare an appropriate defence.
Section 214:
● Words used in describing an offence should be interpreted according to their legal sense.
● The legal sense is determined by the law under which the offence is punishable.
Section 215:
● Errors or omissions in a charge are not considered material unless they actually mislead
the accused and lead to a failure of justice.
● No error or omission in the charge will be regarded as material unless it affects the
accused's understanding of the charges against them.
● Minor errors or omissions that do not affect the accused's understanding of the charges
will not be considered important.
Section 216:
● Any court may alter or add to a charge at any time before judgment is pronounced.
● The accused must be informed and the alteration or addition must be explained to them.
● If the alteration or addition is not likely to prejudice the accused or the prosecutor, the
court may proceed with the trial as if the altered or added charge was the original charge.
● If the alteration or addition is likely to prejudice the accused or the prosecutor, the court
may direct a new trial or adjourn the trial for a necessary period.
● If the offence stated in the altered or added charge requires previous sanction for
prosecution, the case cannot proceed until such sanction is obtained.
Section 217:
● When a charge is altered or added to by the court during the trial, the prosecutor and
accused have the right to recall or re-summon any witness who may have been examined.
● They also have the right to call any further witness whom the court may consider
material.
● However, if the court thinks that the recalling or re-examination of any witness is for
vexation or delay or for defeating the ends of justice, it may disallow it and record its
reasons for doing so.
Section 218:
● Every distinct offense of which a person is accused must be separately charged and tried.
● The accused can request that all or some of the charges against them be tried together if
the magistrate agrees and believes it will not prejudice the accused.
Section 219:
● If a person is accused of more than one offense of the same kind committed within 12
months, they can be charged with and tried for any number of them at one trial, up to
three.
● Offenses are considered of the same kind if they are punishable with the same amount of
punishment under the same section of the Indian Penal Code or any special or local law.
Section 220:
● If a person commits more than one offense in a series of acts forming the same
transaction, they can be charged with and tried for every such offense.
● If a person is accused of committing one or more offenses of falsification of accounts for
facilitating or concealing the commission of criminal breach of trust or dishonest
misappropriation of property, they can be charged with and tried for every such offense at
one trial.
● If the acts alleged constitute offenses under two or more separate definitions of any law,
the person accused can be charged with and tried for each such offense at one trial.
● If several acts, which would constitute different offenses by themselves, constitute a
different offense when combined, the person accused can be charged with and tried for
the offense constituted by such acts when combined, and for any offense constituted by
any one or more of such acts.
● However, Section 71 of the Indian Penal Code is not affected by this section.
221. Where it is doubtful what offence has been committed
● When it is not clear which of several offenses a person has committed based on the facts
that can be proven, the accused can be charged with all or any of those offenses, or
charged in the alternative with having committed one of them.
● If the accused is charged with one offense, but the evidence presented in court shows that
they actually committed a different offense that falls under the same ambiguous
circumstances, they can still be convicted of that offense even if they were not originally
charged with it.
Section 222:
● (1) If a person is charged with an offense that includes several parts, and a combination of
some of those parts equals a minor offense, the person can be convicted of the minor
offense even if it wasn't specifically charged.
● (2) If the facts presented during a trial reduce the offense to a minor offense, the person
can be convicted of the minor offense even if it wasn't specifically charged.
● (3) If a person is charged with an offense, they can be convicted of an attempt to commit
that offense even if the attempt wasn't specifically charged.
● (4) This section does not allow for the conviction of any minor offense if the necessary
conditions for initiating proceedings regarding that offense have not been met.
Section 225
In a trial before a Court of Session, a Public Prosecutor shall conduct the prosecution.
Section 226
When the accused is brought before the Court in pursuance of a commitment of the case under
section 209, the prosecutor shall
- describe the charge and
- state the evidence proposed to prove the accused's guilt.
SUMMARY TRIALS
Section 300 - Person once convicted or acquitted not to be tried for the same offense:
● A person cannot be tried again for the same offense or any other offense based on the
same facts after conviction or acquittal.
● With the State Government's consent, a person acquitted or convicted may be tried for
any distinct offense.
● A person convicted of an offense may be tried for a different offense if consequences
were unknown or hadn't happened at the time of conviction.
● Despite an acquittal or conviction, a person may be tried for any other offense constituted
by the same acts if the first trial court was not competent.
● A person discharged under section 258 shall not be tried again for the same offense
without consent from the discharging court or its subordinate court.
THE JUDGEMENT:
Section 367 - Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken:
● High Court may initiate further inquiry or request additional evidence.
● High Court can conduct the inquiry or evidence collection or direct Court of
Session to do so.
● Convicted person's presence may not be necessary during inquiry or evidence
collection.
● Result of inquiry or evidence to be certified to the High Court.
Section 300 - Person once convicted or acquitted not to be tried for the same offense:
● A person cannot be tried again for the same offense or any other offense based on the
same facts after conviction or acquittal.
● With the State Government's consent, a person acquitted or convicted may be tried for
any distinct offense.
● A person convicted of an offense may be tried for a different offense if consequences
were unknown or hadn't happened at the time of conviction.
● Despite an acquittal or conviction, a person may be tried for any other offense constituted
by the same acts if the first trial court was not competent.
● A person discharged under section 258 shall not be tried again for the same offense
without consent from the discharging court or its subordinate court.
Section 317 - Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in
certain cases:
If the Judge or Magistrate is satisfied that the accused's personal attendance isn't necessary or the
accused persistently disturbs proceedings, they may:
a. Dispense with the accused's attendance if represented by a pleader.
b. Proceed with the inquiry or trial in the accused's absence.
1. c. Direct the accused's personal attendance at any subsequent stage.
If the accused isn't represented by a pleader or their attendance is necessary, the Judge or
Magistrate may:
a. Adjourn the inquiry or trial for reasons to be recorded.
2. b. Order that the accused's case be taken up or tried separately.
Section 319 - Proceeding against other persons appearing to be guilty of the offense:
1. If during an inquiry or trial, evidence suggests that someone other than the accused has
committed an offense, the Court may proceed against that person.
2. The person may be arrested or summoned if not attending the Court.
3. A person attending the Court may be detained for inquiry or trial purposes.
4. Proceedings against such person will start afresh, with witnesses re-heard, and the case
proceeds as if the person had been accused from the beginning.
1. If the fine is imposed in a case subject to appeal, no payment shall be made before the
period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed or the decision of the appeal, if an
appeal is presented.
2. When a court imposes a sentence that does not include a fine, the court may order the
accused person to pay compensation to the person who has suffered any loss or injury
due to the act for which the accused person has been sentenced.
3. An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High
Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision.
4. When awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the
court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this
section.
Section 357A - Victim compensation scheme:
1. Every State Government, in coordination with the Central Government, shall prepare a
scheme for providing funds for compensation to the victim or their dependents who
require rehabilitation due to loss or injury as a result of a crime.
2. The District Legal Service Authority or the State Legal Service Authority shall decide the
quantum of compensation when the court recommends compensation.
3. If the trial court concludes that the compensation awarded under section 357 is
inadequate for rehabilitation, or in cases of acquittal or discharge, it may recommend
compensation for rehabilitation.
4. If the offender is not traced or identified, but the victim is identified, and no trial takes
place, the victim or their dependents may apply to the State or the District Legal Services
Authority for compensation.
5. Upon receiving recommendations or applications, the State or the District Legal Services
Authority shall award adequate compensation after completing the inquiry within two
months.
6. The State or the District Legal Services Authority may order immediate first-aid or
medical benefits free of cost or any other interim relief as deemed fit.
Section 357B - Compensation in addition to fine under sections 326A or 376D of the Indian
Penal Code:
Compensation payable by the State Government under section 357A shall be in addition to the
payment of fine to the victim under sections 326A, 376AB, 376D, 376DA, and 376DB of the
Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
APPEALS
Section 373 - Appeal from an order requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting a
bond:
● This section allows a person who is required by a court order to give security or whose
bond has been rejected or not accepted to file an appeal against that order.
● The appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order, and it can be filed in the Court of
Session or High Court.
Section 375 - No appeal in certain cases when the accused pleads guilty:
This section states that there shall be no appeal when the accused pleads guilty and is convicted
based on that plea, in the following situations:
a) If the conviction is by a High Court
b) If the conviction is by a Court of Session, Metropolitan Magistrate, or Magistrate of
the first or second class, except as to the extent or legality of the sentence.
Section 379:
● Allows appeal to Supreme Court
● Applies when High Court reverses acquittal and convicts with severe sentences
Section 380:
● Special right of appeal
● Applies when multiple persons are convicted in one trial
Section 381:
1. Appeal to Court of Session heard by Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge
● Exception: Magistrate of the second class cases heard by Assistant Sessions Judge
or Chief Judicial Magistrate
2. Additional Sessions Judges, Assistant Sessions Judges, or Chief Judicial Magistrates hear
appeals assigned by Sessions Judge or directed by High Court
Plea bargaining is a legal process in which the accused and the prosecution negotiate a mutually
satisfactory disposition of a criminal case, typically involving the accused pleading guilty to a
lesser offense in exchange for a lighter sentence. In India, the concept of plea bargaining was
introduced through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, which amended the Criminal
Procedure Code (CrPC).
Relevant sections of the CrPC that deal with plea bargaining are Sections 265A to 265L:
1. Section 265A - Application of the Chapter: This section clarifies that plea bargaining is
applicable only to cases where the maximum punishment is imprisonment for seven years
or less and does not involve offenses affecting the socio-economic condition of the
country or committed against a woman or a child below 14 years.
2. Section 265B - Application for Plea Bargaining: The accused can file an application for
plea bargaining in the court where the trial is pending. The application must include a
brief description of the case and the offense committed, and it must be filed voluntarily
by the accused.
3. Section 265C - Guidelines for Mutually Satisfactory Disposition: The court, after
examining the application, may permit the prosecution and the accused to work out a
mutually satisfactory disposition of the case, which may include giving compensation to
the victim and other terms agreed upon by the parties.
4. Section 265D - Report of the mutually satisfactory disposition: If a satisfactory
disposition of the case has been worked out, the court shall prepare a report of such
disposition, which shall be signed by the presiding officer and all parties involved.
5. Section 265E - Disposal of the case: After the court records the mutually satisfactory
disposition, it shall dispose of the case by awarding the sentence as per the terms of the
disposition. This may include a reduced sentence or the imposition of a fine.
6. Section 265F - Judgment of the Court: The court shall deliver its judgment in open court,
and the judgment must be signed by the presiding officer.
7. Section 265G - Finality of the Judgment: The judgment delivered by the court under
Section 265F shall be final, and no appeal shall lie against it, except for the special leave
petition under Article 136 of the Constitution or a writ petition under Articles 226 and
227.
8. Section 265H - Power of the Court in Plea Bargaining: The court, in the exercise of its
powers under this chapter, shall have all the powers vested in it under the CrPC for trial
of cases.
9. Section 265I - Period of Detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the
sentence of imprisonment: The provisions of Section 428 of the CrPC shall apply in
relation to the accused who has undergone detention during the investigation, inquiry, or
trial of the same case.
10. Section 265J - Savings: The provisions of this chapter do not affect any other provisions
of the CrPC or any other law for the time being in force.
11. Section 265K - Statements not to be used: Statements made by the accused during plea
bargaining proceedings shall not be used for any other purpose except for the specific
plea bargaining process.
12. Section 265L - Non-application of the Chapter: This chapter does not apply to cases
where the accused has previously been convicted of the same offense.