The document compares and contrasts performances of the same piece of music by Joplin and Morton. It analyzes differences in rhythm and syncopation, tempo, interpretation, nuances and ornamentation, and personal enjoyment. Joplin's performance has a faster tempo, simpler rhythm and melody, less dynamic range and ornamentation. Morton's performance has a slower tempo, more complex rhythm and syncopation, wider dynamic range, and more ornamentation and nuances. The author prefers Morton's performance for being more expressive, complex, and enjoyable to listen to repeatedly.
The document compares and contrasts performances of the same piece of music by Joplin and Morton. It analyzes differences in rhythm and syncopation, tempo, interpretation, nuances and ornamentation, and personal enjoyment. Joplin's performance has a faster tempo, simpler rhythm and melody, less dynamic range and ornamentation. Morton's performance has a slower tempo, more complex rhythm and syncopation, wider dynamic range, and more ornamentation and nuances. The author prefers Morton's performance for being more expressive, complex, and enjoyable to listen to repeatedly.
The document compares and contrasts performances of the same piece of music by Joplin and Morton. It analyzes differences in rhythm and syncopation, tempo, interpretation, nuances and ornamentation, and personal enjoyment. Joplin's performance has a faster tempo, simpler rhythm and melody, less dynamic range and ornamentation. Morton's performance has a slower tempo, more complex rhythm and syncopation, wider dynamic range, and more ornamentation and nuances. The author prefers Morton's performance for being more expressive, complex, and enjoyable to listen to repeatedly.
The document compares and contrasts performances of the same piece of music by Joplin and Morton. It analyzes differences in rhythm and syncopation, tempo, interpretation, nuances and ornamentation, and personal enjoyment. Joplin's performance has a faster tempo, simpler rhythm and melody, less dynamic range and ornamentation. Morton's performance has a slower tempo, more complex rhythm and syncopation, wider dynamic range, and more ornamentation and nuances. The author prefers Morton's performance for being more expressive, complex, and enjoyable to listen to repeatedly.
Rhythm and Syncopation More rhythmic and Rhythm is groovier. simpler melody and Syncopation is more arrangement. This accented by using rubato or makes it easy to dance ritard which makes it to. Syncopation is easily harder to follow. Better to felt and easy to follow. listen or slow dance instead of high-paced dancing. Tempo Faster tempo which Slower tempo which makes results to the high it groovier, dramatic and energy of the sweeter. The slower tempo performance making the also allows Morton to add audience feel hyped and more ornamentations and wanting to dance. It also nuances. makes it livelier. Interpretation The interpretation of the Morton interprets the piece . piece is like an “in your more expressively. There is face” or “straight to the a wider range of dynamics point” type of music. It and phrasings. As said has little range of earlier, he uses ornaments dynamic. It is played like and rubatos. It is played like the Germanic style. It is the Bel Canto style. It feels like Joplin intended for like the piece is to be played the music to be lively at the stage with the and “dancy” audience listening to it rather than dancing. Nuances and Ornamentation There are some grace More ornamentations than I notes but seems less Joplin’s performance. The impactful due to the fast ornamentations were more tempo. impactful, especially the trills, due to the slower tempo. The nuance of making the syncopation impactful by using rubatos and ritard. Personal Enjoyment The faster tempo, I personally enjoyed . simple, easy to follow Morton’s performance rhythm and melody more than Joplin’s. It is makes Joplin’s more expressive, complex performance easy to and some parts of the dance to. He performance gave me successfully made me goosebumps. I like the feel lively. While I do slower tempo, groovy enjoy it, it does get tiring rhythm, and complex after several repetitions. arrangement. Overall, I find it more interesting to listen to. I can imagine myself listening to it numerous times on repeat.