Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ascent of Man 50 Years Later Part 1
Ascent of Man 50 Years Later Part 1
-PART I-
EDITORIAL Primer Poder AC – Board of Directors
"The Human Being, unlike other living species, is not only part of the environment, but is the
only one who has modified it for his benefit. " - Jacob Bronowski /The Ascent of Man (1973)
The Ascent of Man was writen by Jacob Bronowski, a scientist who used his skills
to expound his point of view on humankind's evolution. By 1973, the British
Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) decided to adapt the book to a TV series that
reached rating records inside and beyond British boundaries.
AsThe Ascent of Man says: “ … we must always remember that the real content
of evolution (biological as well as cultural) is the elaboration of new behaviour. ”
Antiquity or elapsed time does not mean expertise, as the latter is related to
new knowledge acquired through practice within a period. In the same line of
contrasts, society's evolution does not mean modernity. One thing is the human
inner quality improvements, and another is the material ones. Evolution includes
modernity, but not the opposite.
Children with new toys may represent modernity, even when creating the
illusion of behaving like adults. A child with a new toy has an inner condition
that still is controlled by primitive patterns. Such a phenomenon is similar to
those societies wealthy enough to buy new "toys" but not to educate people
capable of becoming the creators of massive improvements. Such cases are
labeled as primitive societies with modern artifacts. Non-educated people are
primitive, with or without modernity.
Human evolution means the personal skills development that builds a behavior
that improves interdependent relationships within different environments.
The ‘70s …
The ‘70s was a decade that set the end of the Post-War era when optimism
drove many bright minds to believe in a better humankind future. At such
moment Jacob Bronowski and the BBC thought it was suitable to speak about
many positive human assets as a starting point for human development to
guarantee a global evolution. Were they right? Were they heard?
Never a clock nor a calendar are responsible for human events, but they can
show passed periods through human events that generate new trends.
From many points of view, the ‘70s decade was a breakthrough period. New
processes generated new behaviors and new products. Post-II World War
expanded Free Will Rights to half the planet, so humankind began to reach its
best moment in history, even when the other half remained in the ancient dark
era.
Many positive lessons from the ‘70s are still operating in the 21st century.
However, when this era suggests being the basis of the following progress, most
of its achievements were the product of previous political strategies set at the
2
end of World War II. Were those leaders more evolutive than the current ones?
As science and technology have improved our living quality in many ways, we
must never place their value upon ours, as these are human-quality products,
not the inverse.
After five decades, Have we defended human quality against the materialistic
one? Has global Democracy expanded to new territories and massively
improved human quality? Has democratic education trained people to become
evolution creators or not?
End of Part I.