Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Critique Form
Peer Critique Form
NOTE: You have been chosen as a peer critic, hence, your comments and suggestions are
solicited to improve the draft of your peer’s essay. Please take time to read and evaluate
his/her draft and consider answering the following questions (adopted from montane.edu
ENGR 125 Peer Critique Form). Thanks!
3. Does the first paragraph also include a preview of the points the paper will use to
support the thesis statement?
Comments/Suggestions:
Yes it does include a preview of the points the paper.
4. Do the topic sentence in each paragraph clearly link back to the thesis statement and
preview of main points in the first paragraph? What suggestions do you have for the
structure—the order of the main points as shown by the topic sentences?
Comments/Suggestions:
Yes it link back to the thesis statement and preview of main points stated in
the first paragraph. For the structure, I don’t have any suggestions for the main points
were ordered very well.
1. Is the writing style appropriate for you—the audience? The paper should be interesting
to read, provide necessary background, and be written at an appropriate level for a
college student to read.
Comments/Suggestions:
The paper is very interesting for it provided me facts, given the references too.
It was written in a very appropriate level for a college student like me to read.
2. Do you see any problems with grammar, punctuation, spelling, or any other writing
conventions? The paper should be written in standard formal English. Mark these issues
on the paper itself and discuss suggestions with the writer.
Comments/Suggestions:
I don’t have any problems other than the choice of words used. Over all the
paper is good and were written in standard formal English