Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 7 Factors Influencing Sequence of Subject Matter
Unit 7 Factors Influencing Sequence of Subject Matter
Once subject matter has been selected, it has to be arranged in some sequence for
teaching. By sequence, it means a
matter is taught first, another is taught second, another third, and so on.
Vertical sequence means the ordering of subject matter with respect to the grade or class:
kindergarten, primary, JSS, SSS, and so on. Vertical sequence is often called grade or class
placement. For example, the topics in Statistics: data collection, data representation, measures
of central tendency, measures of dispersion, correlation and regression may be arranged so
that all of these are taught in in form, this is an example of vertical sequence. In a horizontal
sequence, these topics are arranged such that aspects of the topics are taught in different
forms.
Horizontal sequence means the ordering either of subject matter with respect to a particular
course in a particular class or of subject matter in a particular topic in a particular course.
Items of subject matter can be arranged in increasing or decreasing utility. When textbook
authors place in the last chapters of their book the subject matter that can be omitted without
introducing gaps in the student’s knowledge, they are using the principle of decreasing utility.
On the other hand, when they put in the first chapter the subject matter that is very easy for
the students, they are employing the principle of increasing utility. Some of the factors that
influence sequence of subject matter include:
1. Prerequisite Knowledge
Prerequisite knowledge is used more frequently than any other factor for determining a
sequence for teaching mathematical subject matter. If knowledge of p is necessary for the
comprehension of q, then p must be taught before q.
x R, y R Э x + y = 0
the student will have to be taught the meaning of the symbols x, y, and Э before they
can understand the generalization stated in mathematical notation. If the conventional
algorithm for adding two common fractions is taught, the teacher ought to teach beforehand
the concepts of numerator and denominator, factoring and how to factor natural numbers.
Again to teach how to apply common logarithms to transform a curve to linear graph,
students ought to have been taught linear graphs. Otherwise, students will not know what the
teacher is talking about when these terms are used.
2. Familiarity
Some topics selected for a course are more familiar than others to students. Topics like sets
and numeration systems are often treated earlier due to the familiarity factor for pupils are
familiar with the idea of groupings from the home. Many teachers and textbook writers use
familiarity to order the presentation of subject matter. They begin with the most and progress
to the least familiar.
3. Abstractness
The word abstraction is derived from a Latin word that means “draw from”. Abstracting is a
cognitive activity that occurs when an individual becomes cognizant of a pattern, of a set of
similarities among differences. For example a student who graphs series of
y = ax2 + bx + c, (a 0), will become aware that though the graphs may be located at
different places in the 2-dimensional space, some are “open upward”, some are “open
downward”, they all have the same shape. The student has abstracted the common property of
shape from the different graphs.
There may be increasing or decreasing abstractness of subject matter, and either of these
orders can be used to determine a sequence. Abstractness increases when restricting
conditions are removed. Thus the sequence
is in the order of increasing abstractness. This is because the right angle condition is removed
in passing from rectangles to parallelograms, the condition of parallel opposite sides is
removed in passing from parallelograms to quadrilaterals, and the four sides condition is
removed in passing from quadrilaterals to polygons. Similarly, the sequence
is increasing abstractness.
geometric figures < polygons < quadrilaterals < parallelograms < rectangles < squares
counting numbers < whole numbers < integers < rational # < irrational # < real # < complex #
Morris Kline (1966) pointed out that the conceptual difficulties mathematicians have
experienced with ideas are the very ones students experience when they come to learn the
ideas. When negative numbers were first conceived, they seemed strange and their
acceptance by mathematicians took time. This was even more true of irrational and imaginary
numbers. Their designation (irrational having the connotation not reasonable and imaginary,
not real) indicated the suspicion with which many mathematicians have regarded them.
Another example is the elements of non-Euclidean geometry, which did not appear to fit
man’s conception of space. Non-Euclidean geometry is harder for students to understand than
Euclidean geometry.
Kline (1966), therefore proposed a genetic principle for ordering the presentation of subject
matter: the order of presentation of mathematical ideas should be the same as the historical
order of their invention or discovery. We can find examples that fit this genetic principle in
curricula. Informal proof precedes formal proof in most courses in geometry. Negative
numbers are taught after positive numbers and imaginaries are taught after real numbers.
Matrix theory follows a study of solution of systems of linear equations. But these sequences
also are in terms of increasing abstractness, and some of them are in terms of familiarity.
Hence the genetic principle, although plausible enough, is not independent of the other
factors.
5. Immediacy of Application