Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIA Shakespeare Marvell
CIA Shakespeare Marvell
The Concept of Time in Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18 and Marvell’s To His Coy Mistress
The concept of time has undergone deep transformations during the Renaissance
period. The Aristotelian definition of time – a number of motions in respect to before and
after, was challenged by deeming time to be independent from motion and in fact connected
to the divine structure of beings in the universe by innovative thinkers and philosophers like
Ficino, Telesio, and Patrizi. Bruno introduced a more relative aspect to time and presented a
perspective which presented that we should rather speak of a multiplicity of times. With time
being no longer referred to the Ptolemaic cosmos, the concept of duration was used to explain
the internal time of things and living beings as defined by Suarez in the beginning of the 17th
century. The philosophy of time as an “inner reality” was of great importance to the field of
literature and moral philosophy as clearly suggestive from works of Shakespeare and
Montaigne.
Let us observe how Shakespeare treats time through his poetry and consider Sonnet 18
for this case. Shakespeare uses this sonnet form to highlight his message about his beloved
and their magnificent appearance. The most instrumental part of this poem is that
Shakespeare eternalizes his words in order to eternalize his love for his beloved and in fact
himself. Furthermore, this suggests how Shakespeare challenges the ravages of time. This is
Mitra2
particularly noticeable in the lines “So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see / so long
lives this, and this gives life to thee” (13-14). Shakespeare says even though his beloved’s
beauty would not last for as long as this poem can exist, his poetry will be eternal.
Shakespeare uses figurative language to personify the sun by calling it “the eye of heaven”
with “his gold complexion dimmed”. By personifying the sun, Shakespeare essentially
degrades the power of the sun which allows him to emphasize his beloved’s beauty and
eternalize it. The line “Nor shall Death brag thou wander’st in his shade” portrays “Death” as
a figure that wanders around his “shade”. Thus, we can infer that his beloved is an ideal not
only for the poet but also for his readers throughout posterity. Such use of figurative language
immortalizes Shakespeare’s beloved whose beauty and power can conquer the ravages of
Now let us observe how the metaphysical poet Andrew Marvell treats time and take his
poem “To His Coy Mistress” to present a contrast to how Shakespeare treats time. Here, the
poet tries to persuade his beloved to consummate their love while there is still time. He says
that if they had all the time in the world, that is if they were immortal, they could develop
their relationship gradually. However, he reminds the fact that they are mortal. Thus, they
have limited time to share their moments of intimacy. The poem seems to be an attempt to
persuade his beloved and to elucidate on mortality in its inevitability and grotesqueness. It is
essentially a ‘carpe diem’ poem. The first stanza explores a hypothetical world where Marvell
questions if he and his beloved were immortal. He imagines a world of eternal pleasure which
is suggestive from the way he describes how he would adore his beloved. He feels no
urgency to consummate their relationship. The second stanza, however, reflects on their
mortality. The poet makes it obvious that death is inevitable. He does not fear going to Hell
and being punished for his sins. However, he fears death as it limits his time to fulfil his
erotic desires. The poet’s fear of death overshadows his erotic passion.
Mitra3
The idea of time and its relation to human existence undergoes a paradigmatic shift
Renaissance humanists, acknowledging and trying to overcome the limitations posed by time,
existence.
Mitra4
Works Cited
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45087/sonnet-18-shall-i-compare-thee-to-a-
summers-day
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44688/to-his-coy-mistress
Richards, Brian. "(Im)Mortality and the Poem: Comparing and Contrasting Marvell and