Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Syllabus_Energy Economics and Policy

Energy and Economy


Introduction to different forms of energy; Understanding energy-economy linkages; Accounting energy balance; Understanding energy
intensity and efficiency; Tradeoffs between energy-environment, Role of globalization and urbanization on energy demand

Economics of Non-renewable Energy


Economics of coal, petroleum and natural gas; Pricing of exhaustible energies - theories and practical issues; Regulation of fossil fuels energy
markets
Economics of Renewable Energy
Drivers and sources of renewable energy; Economics of renewable energy supply; Developing markets for renewable energies
Environmental Implications of Energy
Energy-economic growth-environment Interactions; Income inequality-energy-pollution linkages; Climate change and environmental Kuznets
Curve; Pollution haven hypothesis; Analysis on energy mixclimate change-market failure; natural resources management, The Clean
Development Mechanism
Current Energy Issues and Policies
Current energy market trend and challenges; Energy policies in selected countries; Energy governance in India; Policy and institutional
arrangement for energy efficiency and management in developing countries; Promoting clean energy usage for sustainable development goals
Suggested Readings

1.Griffin, J. M., & Steele, H. B. (2013). Energy economics and policy. Elsevier.

2.Tietenberg, T. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, seventh edition, Addison Wesley, 2006

3.Munasinghe, M. and P. Meier, Energy Policy Analysis and Modelling. U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1993

4. Ristinen, R. and J. Kraushaar, Energy and the Environment, John Wiley and Sons, 1998.

5. Wright, R.T., Environmental Science: Towards Sustainable Future, Pearson, Eleventh Edition, 2011
Country Maps: The Middle East
1. Bahrain
2. Cyprus
3. Egypt
4. Iran
5. Iraq
6. Israel
7. Jordan
8. Kuwait
9. Lebanon
10. Oman
11. Qatar
12. Saudi Arabia
13. Syria
14. Turkey
15. United Arab Emirates
16. Yemen

https://www.infoplease.com/atlas/middle-east
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC, 1960, Iraq)

1. Iran (1960)  “any country with a substantial net export of crude petroleum, which
2. Iraq (1960) has fundamentally similar interests to those of Member Countries, may
3. Kuwait (1960) become a Full Member of the Organization’’
4. Saudi Arabia (1960)
5. Venezuela (1960)  Currently, the Organization has a total of 13 Member Countries
6. Qatar (1961)
7. Indonesia (1962) Mission
8. Libya (1962)
9. United Arab Emirates (1967)  Ensure the stabilization of oil markets
10. Algeria (1969)
11. Nigeria (1971)  Secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers
12. Ecuador (1973)
13. Gabon (1975)  A steady income to producers and
14. Angola (2007)
15. Equatorial Guinea (2017)  A fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry.
16. Congo (2018)
https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/25.htm
OPEC PLUS (+) OIL PRODUCING COUNTRIES

Formed in late 2016

To put more control on the global oil market

Non-OPEC Countries: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia,


Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan
https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm
Percentage of World Crude Oil Production by Country, 1850-1984
Percentage of Government Owned Oil Production for Selected Years in OPEC Countries
Total World Crude Oil Reserves by Region in 1975 and 1984, in Billions of Barrels of Proved Reserves
WHY ENERGY ECONOMICS AND POLICY?

 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE ENERGY PROBLEM

 Arab Oil Embargo between 1973-1983 [Currently 13 member countries]

 OPEC Monopoly

 Oil prices hike in 1973: energy crisis

 Inflation & unemployment in Non-OPEC countries

 Environmental threat in Non-OPEC countries


The Role of Energy in Economic Development

 Role of Energy

 Energy is an input in economic activities.

 Energy consumption matters for households, firms and governments.

 Environmental Consequences

 Planet is becoming hotter because of fossil fuels extraction and usage.

 Excessive energy usage creates ‘‘anthropogenic carbon emissions’’.

 Pollution level in the atmosphere is increasing due to ‘‘human activities’’.

 Environmental change caused by ‘‘people’’.

 For example, burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, land use, fertilization, waste management and
industrial processes
On the relationship between energy consumption and GDP

 Energy-led growth hypothesis.

 Efficient utilisation of energy resources.

 Higher economic growth.

 Decouple Hypothesis.
 The causal nexus between gross energy consumption (GEC) and gross
domestic product (GDP) based on causality idea of Granger (1969)

Findings: Both have significant positive impacts via regression


In testing for causality, four directional hypotheses (Kraft and Kraft, 1978; henceforth K & K), Period: 1947-
1974

a) Conservation b) Growth c) Feedback d) Neutrality


Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis Hypothesis
(GD GEC) (GEC GDP) (GEC GDP) (GEC GDP)

Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 401-403.
Akarca, A. T., & Long, T. V. (1980). On the relationship between energy and GNP: a reexamination. The Journal of Energy and
Development, 326-331.
Rath, B. N., Akram, V., Bal, D. P., & Mahalik, M. K. (2019). Do fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption affect total factor productivity growth? Evidence
from cross-country data with policy insights. Energy policy, 127, 186-199.
Hypothesis Discussion

a) Conservation Hypothesis:

 GEC to GDP-No causal influence on economic activity

 Implications

 Energy conservation would not have an adverse effect on economic activity.

 Energy conservation as a feasible policy tool without impairing economic activity.

 It is thereby an attractive policy option.


b) Growth-Hypothesis:

 GEC causes GDP-unidirectional causality supported [GDP=f(GEC)]

 This shows that economic growth is dependent upon energy use.

 Implications

 Decreases in energy availability could have serious socio-economic welfare implications.

 Higher energy prices will modify the structural relation between them.

 So any conservative energy policy will hamper or limit economic growth.


c) Feedback Hypothesis:

 EC and GDP-bidirectional causality [i.e. GEC=f(GDP); GDP=g(GEC)].

 Both cause each other. Both are interdependent with each other.

 Implications

 Energy conservation strategies aimed at decreasing energy consumption for environmental quality
may lower economic growth performance

 Similarly, any growth policy aimed at reducing economic activities for lowering carbon
emissions will also lower the usage of energy.
d) Neutrality Hypothesis:

 GEC and GDP-no relation.

Implications

 Energy conservation policies have no effect on growth

 Change of economy may not affect energy.


Total number of country-specific studies (116) at the global level
45
33.62%
40 39
26.72%
35

31
22.41%
30 17.24%
26
25

20
20

15

10

0
Conservative hypothesis Growth Hypothesis Feedback hypothesis Neutrality hypothesis

Growth energy use Energy use growth Growth energy use Growth energy use
Number of multi-country studies-34

9% 0%

9%

6% Mixed findings

Conservative hypothesis

Growth hypothesis

Feed back Hypothesis

Neutrality hypothesis

76%
 The services that environment provides

o Flow resources
o Stock resources

 Flow resources: no link between current use and future availability

 Solar radiation-if a roof has a solar water heater on it, amount of water heating today

 Same water heating can be done tomorrow

 Renewable resources-biotic, plant & animal populations

 Capacity to grow over time via biological reproduction


 Stock resources: current use does affect future availability

 stocks of minerals-coal, oil [non-renewable-abiotic]

 Don’t have capacity to grow over time

 No positive constant rate of use

 Exhaustible or depletable resources

 Resources are exhaustible if harvested too long exceeding their generation capacities

 If harvest exceeds natural growth, unsustainable resources or declining stock size

 No natural reproduction except geological timescales

You might also like