Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 1
Module 1
MODULE 1
QUALITY POLICY
NIPSC commits itself to continually strive to provide quality and relevant instruction, research and
extension activities adhering to quality standards and regulatory requirements in order to meet
the highest level of clientele satisfaction with commitment to continual improvement of the
management system.
VISION
“A globally competitive State University in Asia”
MISSION
“Human resources development through quality and relevant education, environment-
friendly modern technologies and preservation of Filipino values and culture for
sustainable and improved quality of life.”
GOALS
The College shall have the following goals:
1. Produce human capital imbued with scientific and technological skills
endowed with desirable values and work ethics;
2. Provide quality education in the fields of industry, agriculture, fisheries,
technology, sciences, education and other relevant undergraduate and
graduate programs;
3. Establish a university research culture responsive to community and global
needs;
4. Enhance research-based extension programs and transfer of sustainable
technologies;
5. Maximize productivity through efficient and effective resource management;
and
6. Strengthen linkages with local, national and international partner-agencies.
CORE VALUES
C-ommunicative
R-esearch oriented
E-xcellent time manager
A-cademically competent
T-echnically equipped
I-nnovative
V-alues oriented
E-nvironment friendly
PURPOSES
The Northern Iloilo Polytechnic State College has the following purposes:
1. Provide advanced and higher education and training in the fields of industry,
agriculture, fisheries, arts, sciences, education, management, hospitality &
tourism, information technology, engineering, criminal justice and services as
well as, continuing education;
2. Promote progressive leadership in research and advanced studies in the
fields of industry, agriculture, fisheries, arts, sciences, education,
management, hospitality & tourism, information technology, engineering,
criminal justice;
3. Undertake sustainable extension activities for technology transfer and
solution of social problems, and;
4. Enhance its critical role in community development.
Course Description:
This is a course that focuses on the principles, development and utilization of
conventional assessment tools to improve the teaching-learning process. It emphasizes on the
use of assessment of, as, and for in measuring knowledge, comprehension and other thinking
skills in the cognitive, psychomotor or affective domains. It allows students to go through the
standard steps in test construction and development and the application in grading systems.
Course Outcomes:
At the end of the course, the students should be able to:
1. explain how the change of emphasis from content to outcomes in education led to the shift of
focus in teaching from subject matter to learner;
2. illustrate examples of measurement, assessment and evaluation in determining the progress of
students towards attaining the desired learning outcomes;
3. differentiate program outcomes from student learning outcomes through examples;
4. give examples of learning outcomes in the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains;
5. explain the principles in assessing learning outcomes through example and illustrations;
6. distinguish the meanings and uses of item analysis, validity, reliability, difficult index,
discrimination index;
7. determine the validity and reliability of given test items;
8. explain the meanings and the uses of the Measures of Central Tendency and of Dispersion:
mean, median, mode, standard deviation; and
9. demonstrate understanding of the principles in assigning grades and implementing grading
systems.
Course Requirements:
Major Exams (Midterm and Final)
Learning Portfolio (Individual/Group)
Learning Activity Sheets
Quizzes, Assignments
Attendance (Online/Offline Participation)
Grading System
A. Cognitive 50%
1. Formative (Quizzes/Assignments) 25%
2. Summative (Midterm/Final) 25%
B. Psychomotor 50%
1. Process/Performance 25%
2. Output/Product 25%
TOTAL 100%
NOLI B. BALLARA
Licensed Professional Teacher
Bachelor of Elementary Education
Master of Arts in Teaching
Email: noliballara23@gmail.com
Mobile Number: 09498578315
How are you today? I hope you enjoy exploring new lessons and interesting
activities in Assessment in Learning 1.
Name: Score/Mark:
Course: Year and Section:
Cont…
Cont…
Examples:
Ability to communicate by writing and speaking
Mathematical problem-solving skill
Skill in identifying objects by using the different senses
Ability to produce artistic or literary works
Ability to do research and write the results
Ability to present an investigative science project
Skill in story-telling
Promotion to a higher grade level
Graduation from a program
Passing a required licensure examination
Initial job placement
Cont…
A Pinch of Salt
Jean-Pierre, the master French chef, was watching Marcel, who was Jean-
Pierre's best student, do a flawless job of preparing the master's hollandaise
sauce. Suddenly. Jean-Pierre began pummeling Marcel with his fists. "Fool!"
he shouted. "I said a pinch of salt, not a pound!" Jean-Pierre was furious. He
threatened to pour the sauce over Marcel's head, but before he could, Marcel
indignantly emptied the whole salt container into the pot.
“There, you old goat, I only added a pinch to begin with, but now there is a
pound of salt in the sauce-and I'm going to make you eat it!"
Startled by his student's response, Jean-Pierre regained his composure. "All
right. All right. So you didn't add a pound, but you certainly added more than
a pinch"
Still upset, Marcel shouted, "Are you senile? You were watching me all the
time and you saw me add only one pinch!" Marcel pressed his right thumb
and index finger together an inch from the master's nose to emphasize his
point.
"Aha! You see! There you have it!" Jean-Pierre said. "That is not the way to
measure a pinch. Only the tips of the thumb and index finger make contact
when you measure a pinch!"
Marcel looked at the difference between his idea of a "pinch" of salt and the
master's. Indeed, there was quite a difference. Marcel's finger and thumb
made contact no just at the fingertips, but all the way down to the knuckle.
At Jean-Pierre's request, they both deposited a "pinch" of salt on the table.
Marcel's pinch contained four or five times as much salt as Jean-Pierre's.
Ask yourself:
a. Who is correct? Is Marcel’s pinch too much? Is Jean-Pierre’s pinch too
little?
b. Whose method would you use to measure a pinch of salt?
c. Explain your answer.
References:
Curpoz, B., Navarro, R., & R. Santos. (2019). Assessment in Learning 1 Fourth
Edition. Lorimar Publishing Inc.. Quezon City. pp. 1-9.
Kubizyn, T. & G. Borich. (2009). Educational Testing Measurement: Classroom
Application and Practice Sixth Edition. Jemma Inc..p.25.