Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Baidhar Broiler & Chicken
Baidhar Broiler & Chicken
Baidhar Broiler & Chicken
4. LIMITATION :
The applicant further declares that the application is within the jurisdiction of
this Tribunal prescribed in Section 24 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Bank
and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
That Sri. Prabir Kumar Swain is the Branch Manager of the applicant
bank and is authorized to sign, verify the application before any court or
Tribunal and to do all necessary acts that may be found necessary on behalf
of the bank. That the applicant bank carries on business of banking such as
accepting deposits, lending and or advancing loans to various persons and
further carries such other activities as are permissible under the banking
Laws.
ii) That the defendant No.1 Proprietorship Firm is the borrower, the
defendant No.2 is the borrower/mortgagor and defendant No.3 is the Co-
obligant and guarantor/mortgagor to the cash credit facility granted by the
applicant bank. That the defendant No.3 has mortgaged the schedule-A
property to the applicant bank. That all the defendants are jointly and
severally liable to pay the dues of the bank.
iii) That the defendants No.1 to 3 approached the applicant bank At-
Purushottampur Branch, Main Road, Purushottampur, Dist-Ganjam, Pin-
761018 and filed an application dt.09.05.16 for sanction of Open Cash Credit
facility of Rs.19 Lakhs for the business of chicken feed trading unit against
the hypothecation of stock of the business and co-lateral security of
residential property situated at KHATA SL NO 326, PLOT NO 546,extent Ac
0.230 Dec(out of total 0.590 from Easter Side) Nimakhandi Revenue Mouza,
Ps.Berhampur-Sadar, Tahasil- Kukudakhandi, Dis-Ganjam. That the
applicant bank considering the aforesaid application of the defendants No.1
to 3 vide letter dt.17.04.17 sanctioned OCC limit of Rs.29,00,000/- in their
favour with interest 10.9% against hypothecation of stocks and Book debts
and collateral security i.e equitable mortgage of residential property situated
at KHATA SL NO 326, PLOT NO 546,extent Ac 0.230 Dec(out of total 0.590
from Easter Side) Nimakhandi Revenue Mouza, Ps.Berhampur-Sadar,
Tahasil- Kukudakhandi, Dis-Ganjam belong to the defendant No.3 with other
terms and conditions enumerated in the said sanction letter for their
business. That the letter of Sanction dt. 17.04.17 was acknowledged by all
the defendants No.1 to 3 as token of the fact that the terms and conditions
4
of the Open Cash Credit limit was accepted to them. That the defendants
accepted the terms and conditions of the sanction letter dt. 17.04.17 and
availed the Open Cash Credit facility and executed necessary documents of
the bank in its standard format as required by the bank. That the Central
Govt. after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India issued a Notification
dt.4.3.2020 in exercise of power conferred U/s 9 Banking Companies
(Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 by preparing a Scheme
which is called the Amalgamation of Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank into
Union Bank of India Scheme, 2020 giving effect from 1.4.2020.The copy of
the application of the defendants and the sanction letter dt. 17.04.17 are
annexed as Annexures-1 and 2.
v) That the defendants availed the cash credit facility sanctioned by the
applicant bank and utilized the same but did not repay the dues of the bank
in-spite of repeated approaches and violated the terms and conditions of the
sanction letter. That the defendants did not pay the dues of the bank and
the account was classified as NPA on 29.08.19. That the Authorized Officer
of the bank issued the demand notice dt.10.09.19 u/s 13(2) of SARFAESI
5
vi) That the borrower failed to repay the outstanding amount within the 60
days limit provided in the said demand notice dt. 10.09.19. That from the
aforesaid facts it is clear that the defendants have violated the terms and
conditions of the sanction letter of the Bank.
vii) That the borrowers having failed to repay the outstanding amount, the
applicant bank issued a possession notice under Rule 8(1) of security
Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002, Schedule A property of defendant No.2
to the borrower, co-obligant and the public in general. That in the said notice
the borrower`s attention is invited to provisions of section 13(8) of the Act,
in respect of time available, to redeem the secured asset. That in the said
notice the borrower, the co-obligant and the public in general are cautioned
not to deal with the schedule-A property. The said posession notice is
annexed as Annexture-7.
viii) That the defendants availed OCC limit of Rs.29,00,000/- for their
business and embarked upon the business, but in breach of the agreed
terms and conditions defaulted in repayment dues to the applicant bank
along with monthly interest. That the defendants failed to discharge the
liabilities and violated the terms and conditions of the documents executed
by them which has been reflected in the statement of Account. The copy of
the statement account in respect of OCC account along with normal and
overdue interest is annexed as Annexure-8.
xii) That the cause of action for this original application arose when the
defendants No. 1 to 2 approached for loan, the loan was sanctioned,
operation of the loan accounts started, mortgaged the Schedule-A property
on 12.07.18 when the defendants failed to repay the loan outstanding of the
applicant bank as per the notice dt.10.09.2019 u/s 13 (2) of the SARFAESI
Act.
xiii) That the interest charged on the said loan is as per the stipulation
made by the RBI from time to time subject to amendment.
6. RELIEF(s) SOUGHT :
That in view of the facts mentioned in Paragraph-5 the applicant Bank
prays for the following reliefs:
b) That an order for pendent lite and future interest at the agreed rate
applicable to the OCC availed by the defendants and as per the charge
from time to time may be passed with monthly rest till realization of
the claim amount against the defendants jointly and severally.
f) Any other relief the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the
interest of Justice.
b) And or any other order as deem fit and proper in the circumstances
of the case.
SCHEDULE – A PROPERTY
Description of property mortgaged by the Defendant No.2 Gupteswar
Pattnaik, Mouza-Nimakhandi, Dist-Ganjam, Thana-Berhampur Sadar,
Tahasil-Kukudakhandi (Previously at Brahmapur), S.R.O-Brahmapur-I, Khata
Sl No-326, Plot No-546, area Ac 0.230dec (out of total Ac 0.805 dec from
Eastern Side).
Boundary:
North-Land covered under Plot No 543, South- Land covered under Plot No
547, East- Land covered under Plot No 545, West- Rest of Land covered
under Plot No 546.
VERIFICATION
I, Sri. Prabir Kumar Swain, aged about 34 years, S/o Bhubaneswar
Swain, Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Purushottampur Branch, Main road,
Prusotampur, Ps- Purusotamour, Po-Purusotamour, Dist-Ganjam having the
valid power of attorney of the bank do hereby verify that the contents in
Paragraphs-1 to 11 are true to the best of my knowledge and based on
official records maintained in the Branch and I have not suppressed any
material facts. I sign this verification on day of November, 2020.
9
Cuttack.
Date: .11.2020 Verificant.
To,
The Registrar, DRT, Cuttack
10
Cuttack.
Date: .11.2020 Advocate.
11
10. Vakalatnama.
Cuttack.
Date: .11.2020 Signature of the Applicant.
8. Statement of account. 3
__________________________________________________________
Total Sheets 30
Cuttack.
Date: .11.2020 Signature of the Applicant.