Directors of large organisations receive much higher salaries than ordinary

workers. Some think it is necessary, while others think it is unfair. Discuss

both views and give your opinion.

In this day and age, with the mushrooming of several sizeable enterprises, there are
also divergent perspectives about the pay gap between senior and junior staffs in
these firms. Although some hold the view that the subordinates should be paid
equally to their top-level executives, I am of the opposed opinion.

On the one hand, it is understandable that working employees demand a pay

scheme that is on par with those of their directors in terms of heavy workload and
job satisfaction. Firstly, the management boards are not the only one that undertake
the firm’s achievements and that others workers also play a pivotal role. Ordinary
labourers work just as industrious as their chairman, therefore, they should be the
one who put more resources into the company’s growth as a whole. Due to this, the
wide discrepancy would fail to reflect precisely the relative contributions of the
managers and their inferior officers. Furthermore, working under any position
could be equally strenuous, so pay disproportion may provoke a sense of
unfairness among staffs, hence mitigating the overall morale, resulting in diverse
impacts on the whole organisation’s productivity.

On the other hand, I am supportive of promoting those who are in charge of the
company with the worthwhile compensation packages regarding their superior
duties and the firm’s turnover in general. First of all, generous pay scale should be
offered to the chief executives officers as they tend to bear a great deal of
responsibilities, specifically negotiating with stakeholders and the power of
decision-making that can make or break the success of the company’s objectives.
Owing to that fact, they have to assume full accountability for consequences with
heightened levels of stress in their job, so they should be rewarded with adequate
remuneration. Moreover, effective leaders are normally visionaries, creating a
stimulating environment and anticipating upcoming trends efficiently, hence
encouraging an enormous difference, spurring growth, innovation and productivity
gains. Thus, the pay gap accurately reflects the fact that the work burden and
contributions of those in management positions greatly exceed that of their
subordinates.

In conclusion, although paying could differ from regular workers to the board of
director, I would ally myself to those who propose that managers should be granted
with more welfare than their inferior officers.