A Peoples History of The United States Chapter 8 Thesis

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Struggling with writing your thesis on "A People's History of the United States" Chapter 8?

You're
not alone. Crafting a thesis that effectively captures the essence of the chapter while presenting a
unique argument can be a daunting task. With the complexity of historical narratives and the need for
critical analysis, many students find themselves overwhelmed and unsure of where to begin.

From dissecting Howard Zinn's intricate arguments to synthesizing various historical perspectives,
writing a thesis for Chapter 8 requires a deep understanding of the text and its implications.
Moreover, it demands the ability to articulate a clear and compelling thesis statement that adds to the
ongoing scholarly discourse.

Fortunately, there's a solution to ease your burden: ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔. Our team of experienced
writers specializes in crafting high-quality academic papers tailored to your specific needs. Whether
you're struggling to formulate a thesis statement or need assistance with research and analysis, we're
here to help.

By entrusting your thesis to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can rest assured that you'll receive a well-
researched, meticulously written paper that meets the highest academic standards. Our writers
possess the expertise and insight necessary to tackle complex topics like Chapter 8 of "A People's
History of the United States," delivering compelling arguments and insightful analysis.

Don't let the challenges of writing a thesis hold you back. Order from ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today
and take the first step towards academic success. With our professional assistance, you can
confidently navigate the complexities of Chapter 8 and produce a thesis that impresses both your
professors and peers.
Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. It discusses America's
major wars, but only to challenge their legitimacy and decry how they supplanted class issues with
nation issues. In 1877, 100,000 workers went on strike against the railroad companies. Basically the
thesis means that we must not accuse, judge, and condemn Columbus absence. However, he wants
to give a sense of the “brief flashes” of history during which ordinary people banded together and
sometimes emerged victorious. And what I'm suggesting is that the answer to... tyrannies like that is
not war, which in our time always involves the massive killing of innocent people.... I think we have
to find ways other than war to get rid of dictatorships and tyrannies. My paramount object in this
struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. Volendo, una sorta di terza
classe era costituita dal clero. Across America, women were instrumental in the growth of
abolitionism. Like many of the persecuted peoples in Zinn’s book, women in the early colonial days
found ways of rebelling against authority and injustice, even though ideological and economic forces
urged them to remain passive and submissive. This one goes right down the line from going for the
worst take possible on Columbus to attacking the motives of everyone involved in the American
Revolution. I really loved the custom made covers which makes them unique from other apps. Why,
Zinn asks, are we so sure that the Indian culture that the Europeans destroyed was inferior to
European culture? ( Christopher Columbus called the people of the New World “Indians” because he
made a colossal error and miscalculated the size of the globe. Fullscreen Sharing Deliver a
distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. He had intended to sail to Asia; he was lucky
that he found North America in the middle of his voyage, since, otherwise, he and his crew would
have starved. He calls things out as he sees them and challenges the narrative norms that have been
inculcated into the minds of many for centuries. And it is important to remember this, since as a
work of inquiry A People’s History of the United States has almost no merit whatsoever. At the next
level, 10 tithing’s or 100 families, were grouped together into a hundred. Howard Zinn (1922-2010)
was a historian, playwright, and activist. However he wants to give a sense of the brief flashes of.
On June 12, 1982, 1,000,000 people gathered in Central Park, New York City, to express their
determination to bring an end to the arms race. Own it Choose how you pay us back over time, up to
6 months interest free. This book is class conscious, not nation conscious. Finally bought it and read
every word -- of the most recent edition -- in 2010. These men were obviously from the elite class,
which begs the question: If they were truly determined to compose a Constitution that ensured
equally for all, why were no slaves, women, servants, or men without property allowed to be a part
of the writing process. Writing in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Christopher Phelps, associate
professor of American studies in the School of American and Canadian Studies at the wrote:
Professional historians have often viewed Zinn's work with exasperation or condescension, and Zinn
was no innocent in the dynamic. Elizabeth Blackwell, a doctor who got her medical degree in 1849
from Geneva College, wrote about one of her first cases, where she called in a local physician for
consultation on a pneumonia patient: This gentleman, after seeing the patient, went with me into the
parlour. Every political ideology relies on some historical narrative. A Young Peoples History of the
United States makes Howard Zinns classic text accessible to a middle school audience. Thus,
systematically omitting episodes of history is equivalent to squelching certain political views.
Such a mentality continued through the devastation of the Depression, and heralded in a new saviour
in the form of FDR. Under his New Deal, America sought to dig itself out of the trenches, if only to
ensure everyone had enough to eat and could survive with targeted government handouts. After
attending college under the GI Bill and earning a Ph.D. in history from Columbia, he taught at
Spelman, where he became active in the civil rights movement. When movements of poor and
working class people coalesced and petitioned for more rights and better working conditions, they
were often met with imprisonment, violence, and death. Economic inequality began to push many to
the brink of starvation and death, while the few pulled the strings and got richer. After the rebellion,
the servants were treated poorly and became part of the underclass. The Spanish and Portuguese
subjugated the people of South and Central America, whilst the English subjugated those in the
North. This, by the way, is another nasty habit of the left: a pretense to knowing the true interests of
the unprivileged, even if the unprivileged themselves disagree with the left and among each other.
America was changing faster than it could react to all that was placed before it. The split vote in the
polls just before the war reflected a public still thinking its opinion might have an effect. While the
rebellion isn’t described in great detail, it describes how slaves and servants joined together behind
Bacon to fight what they considered a common enemy, the white upper class. To disallow this book
in the classroom because it shows another side of the story, is unhealthy. Columbus set a precedent
for conquest and cruelty that continues, as we’ll see, throughout American history. Fullscreen
Sharing Deliver a distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. He does not omit the story
of mass murder; indeed he describes it with the harshest word one can use: genocide. And even
though Zinn admits that the Revolutionary rhetoric of equality wasn’t primarily intended to apply to
women, it inspired some thinkers to argue for equal rights for women. Some historians have argued
that Columbus should be interpreted as a “product of his time” (in other words, that his genocidal
acts were normal behavior at the time). Very encouraging to see this rise of civic responsibility in my
community. Every U.S. citizen owes it to the country to understand our history, and few sources can
compare to Zinn's impressive A to Z. They write about women, Native Americans, labor activists,
homosexuals.all these groups of people who have long been considered insignificant in the forming
of our more perfect union. Or consider this paragraph: The American system is the most ingenious
system of control in world history. A teachers guide to Voices of A People's History of the United
States. And there are historical examples of where war is the only way to achieve a moral end. It
makes a lot more sense the older you get. (Unless you're one of the Koch Brothers, I suppose.). It
was a society in favor of the few at the expense of the many. Previous page African slavery lacked
two elements that made American slavery the most cruel form of slavery in history: the frenzy for
limitless profit that comes from capitalistic agriculture; the reduction of the slave to less than human
status by the use of racial hatred, with that relentless clarity based on color, where white was master,
black was slave. Perhaps we know a bit of this history, and recognize that European-Native
American relations were more antagonistic than harmonious. In short, history textbooks are too quick
to assume that European explorers conquered the Native Americans because they were inherently
better (more technologically advanced, more “civilized,” etc.). Indeed, the clearest advantage that the
Europeans seem to have had over the Native Americans was their propensity for violence and
cruelty. Perhaps at times, but Columbus’ men also enslaved many of the natives and treated them
with extreme hostility. Perhaps we know a bit of this history, and recognize that European-Native
American relations were more antagonistic than harmonious. These experiences helped shape his
opposition to war and passion for history. Highlighted by 3,391 Kindle readers In two years, through
murder, mutilation, or suicide, half of the 250,000 Indians on Haiti were dead.
I say book, but it was actually an audio book, so I should probably say CDs. What we must ask,
then, is this: Does Zinn’s moral aim excuse this approach. In 1990, the average pay of the chief
executive officers of the 500 largest corporations was 64 times that of the average worker. Still, it's in
that list of books that truly changed out country and the way Americans think and I love it for that.
In 1886 there were over 1,400 strikes, involving 500,000 workers. But more generally, there is a
welcome consideration of the justification for spending citizens' money on vast military projects
instead of on ways to help those of them with no food, housing, or employment. I also think that
Zinn should have highlighted more individual stories and condensed some tedious lists of
movements, if only for dramatic effect. This, again, is only a partial truth, as “more than half the
colonists who came to the North American shores in the colonial period came as servants.”
Subjugation was not only reserved for the Native Americans, even many white men and women
were oppressed by their own European elites. I designed this as a summer reading assignment for AP
United States history, but it could be used throughout the year, especially when paired with other
perspectives on each era. And even though, largely thanks to Zinn, many of the episodes he covered
in this book have made their way into school curriculums and the national awareness, I still learned
a great deal from reading this. The problem with such an explanation, at the most basic level, is that
the proverbial “greater good” is never good for everyone: it’s usually just beneficial to a handful of
privileged people. When it was over, in 1676, the English had won, but their resources were drained;
theyhad lost six hundred men. Nevertheless, I think it is obvious that he relies on books—again,
mostly secondary sources—that are broadly sympathetic with his views; that he selectively quotes
those who aren’t; and that he questions the motivations of any who disagree with him. Read it if
your American history education hasn't included enough skepticism. And it is important to remember
this, since as a work of inquiry A People’s History of the United States has almost no merit
whatsoever. While the rebellion isn’t described in great detail, it describes how slaves and servants
joined together behind Bacon to fight what they considered a common enemy, the white upper class.
While certainly not a pretty self-portrait, it does end on a hopeful note: 'the people' have created
change, and we can do it again. As Governor Winthrop wrote: They had commission to put to death
the men of Block Island, but to spare the women and children,and to bring them away, and to take
possession of the island; and from thence to go to the Pequodsto demand the murderers of Captain
Stone and other English, and one thousand fathom of wampumfor damages, etc. European
colonists—and the historians who’ve deified them in textbooks—have offered the same explanation
for colonial brutality: the ends justified the means. It was a society in favor of the few at the expense
of the many. They were given the least food and treated with the least respect. Digital Sales Sell your
publications commission-free as single issues or ongoing subscriptions. This item cannot be shipped
to your selected delivery location. Here, for example, he shows how universities trained women not
for a lifetime of domesticity and obedience, but rather for a lifetime of resistance to sexism and
misogyny. Not simply when the electorate that voted them into office wants it, but when the people
demand it in ways that cannot be easily ignored (as the polls more or less can when both parties are
so similar on many basic issues). But understanding that going in, it'll show you the silent side of our
history without making you hate our country. In 1877, 100,000 workers went on strike against the
railroad companies. Teach your students to analyze literature like LitCharts does. Adobe InDesign
Design pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe InDesign. Help Center
Here you'll find an answer to your question.
However, if half of eligible voters don’t bother to participate and don’t believe in the system, is it
really a democracy. I am not troubled by that, because the mountain of history books under which we
all stand leans so heavily in the other direction - so tremblingly respectful of states and statesmen
and so disrespectful, by inattention, to people's movements - that we need some counterforce to
avoid being crushed into submission. Videos Help others learn more about this product by uploading
a video. So, if nothing else, this book gave me a little refresher course on historical events. But
understanding that going in, it'll show you the silent side of our history without making you hate our
country. But back to all the people whining about Zinn's whining (yeah, I know, funny, huh?;o)What
frequently happens is that people respond emotionally and within that emotion analyze incorrectly,
therefore, missing the mark and attacking the author (not always, but often). HZ: In the case of
WWII, I don't know what it would have taken to get rid of Hitler. However, he also hints at the fact
that there was another war brewing, in which social groups were on the rise. Our Teacher Edition on
A People’s History makes teaching easy. In 1877, 100,000 workers went on strike against the
railroad companies. It is now beginning to fail for the middle classes.” I suggested, at the beginning
of this review, that Howard Zinn had a “unique view of American history.” That suggestion was in
no sense ironic or tongue-in-cheek. Voting, in fact, can be seen as consitently as a device for making
people feel empowered while changing little. The Spanish and Portuguese subjugated the people of
South and Central America, whilst the English subjugated those in the North. I need to come up with
a plausible lie to tell my boss tomorrow about what I've been working on. He clearly cared more
about allocating money for the military industrial complex than for the poor. Report this resource to
let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines. Between 1790 and 1860, the number
of slaves grew from 500,000 to 4,000,000. Merchants, real estate agents, stock speculators, reckless
adventurers, and promoters of all kinds of get-rich schemes flocked to Cuba by the thousands. What
is most likely affecting most people is an initial exposure to long-covered truths, something Zinn has
nothing to do with. Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. First
off, some of them don't realize how batshit nuts Sarah Palin is. That's bad. And, that's not nearly as
bad as the fact that they don't realize how batshit nuts GLENN BECK is. Winthrop further argued
that the few Indians who did live in New England had no legal right to the land, because they hadn’t
developed it agriculturally. I'm excited to incorporate these questions and this book into my
American history and Modern US history classes this year! — Kaitlin R. Get the entire A People’s
History LitChart as a printable PDF. Most Revolutionary historians have ignored the contributions of
working-class women—the few women they do discuss are genteel wives, such as Abigail Adams. I
HATE THIS BOOK! His basic thesis is that America was built on the blood and suffering of the
poor. No account of history escapes this phenomenon.This brings an important question to light:
Whose account of history have we been taught. Covering through President Clinton's first term, A
People's History of the United States tells the stories of the men and women involved with power
and passion. Read more. Reading the average American history textbook, it’s easy to “forget half the
population of the country.” Women were largely invisible in public life, and they’re still largely
invisible in histories of the early United States. I have yet to hear anyone willing to challenge the
importance of the military industrial complex.anyone in politics, that is.
Perhaps we know a bit of this history, and recognize that European-Native American relations were
more antagonistic than harmonious. Get the entire A People’s History LitChart as a printable PDF.
Instead what one finds is a list of books Zinn used to bolster his beliefs about American history. The
Spanish conquest of Mexico, led by Hernan Cortes caused a rather threatening effect on the cultural
survival of the natives. Es una novela reveladora y a veces puede parecer muy dura. However, if half
of eligible voters don’t bother to participate and don’t believe in the system, is it really a democracy.
The publics fear concerning the safety of rail travel c. When movements of poor and working class
people coalesced and petitioned for more rights and better working conditions, they were often met
with imprisonment, violence, and death. This brings an important question to light: Whose account
of history have we been taught. Granted that this book is advocacy, we must then ask two more
questions: whether it is responsible or irresponsible, and whether it is altruistic or selfish.
Furthermore, most Europeans didn’t benefit in the slightest from the colonization of the New
World—all the wealth flowed to the top of the social hierarchy. In other words, even if the precise,
economic reasons for Jefferson’s claim that “all men are created equal” had very little to do with
women, other thinkers were able to co-opt Jefferson’s rhetoric and use it to argue for forms of
equality (such as gender equality) that Jefferson himself never envisioned. I think Zinn faced just
this dilemma in this book, forced to choose between a work that would satisfy academics and would
sell well, and he chose popularity. The article goes on to further say there were thousands of black
slave owners in the south, something I've never read about elsewhere. European explorers reported
that the Indians were incredibly kind, gentle, and generous. E quelli erano bianchi: per ripagare il
debito contratto con il viaggio, restavano in servitu alcuni anni, generalmente tra i 5 e i 7 - a
condizioni senz’altro migliori di quelle degli schiavi. He covers a whole lot, even considering the
length of the book, and has done a lot of work since the book's original publication to add sections
addressing the plight of those segments of our population that were ignored in the earliest printings.
I cite this only as an example of Zinn’s use of rhetoric and insinuation to make political points, a
dishonest habit. Zinn has received much credit for revealing truth, for reinvigorating our education
system and our view of history, but honestly, his work was a bit late for that--already, such diverse
perspectives were emerging, and while it took some time for them to trickle down to Middle Schools
and the public consciousness, nothing in his book was a revelation to devoted students of history.
After attending college under the GI Bill and earning a Ph.D. in history from Columbia, he taught at
Spelman, where he became active in the civil rights movement. The country was thus presided over
by a man who was selected by just over one-quarter of the citizenry. You were in the main stream
and only pretending (or possibly fooling yourself to put the best face on it) to go against the main
stream. On June 12, 1982, 1,000,000 people gathered in Central Park, New York City, to express
their determination to bring an end to the arms race. For many of us, especially those of us taught in
public schools, it is the version approved by people in positions of power. With selected chapters
written by Humboldt County AP teachers: Jack Bareilles (McKinleyville High School), Natalia
Boettcher (South Fork High School), Mike Benbow (Fortuna High School), Ron Perry (Eureka High
School), Robin Pickering, Jennifer Rosebrook (Arcata High School), Colby Smart (Ferndale High
School), and Robert Standish (South Fork High School). But of course, this excuse ignores the basic
greed and acquisitiveness of the European colonists: what was “good” for Europe was lethal for the
Native Americans. But let me suggest some balance, bias is bias no matter which side it comes from
or comes down on. Zinn grew up in Brooklyn in a working-class, immigrant household. Economic
inequality began to push many to the brink of starvation and death, while the few pulled the strings
and got richer. Every evaluation of his book must begin and end with this achievement.
Zinn freely admits that this is a biased account, one that leans in a certain direction. It is also largely
thanks to Zinn, I believe, that there is a growing movement against the celebration of Columbus Day
(a person who I don’t think we ought to celebrate). This, again, is only a partial truth, as “more than
half the colonists who came to the North American shores in the colonial period came as servants.”
Subjugation was not only reserved for the Native Americans, even many white men and women
were oppressed by their own European elites. However, as Zinn says here, such notions are wrong,
and potentially racist. Powerful, fluent and argumentative, its vigorous reinterpretation of the
American achievement, and its cost, has provoked debate amongst historians and laymen alike since
it first appeared in 1980. It wasn’t until I heard the state of Arkansas was trying to have this book
banned from its schools, that it piqued my interest. In 1977, the top 10 percent of the American
population had an income thirty times that of the bottom tenth; the top 1 percent of the nation owned
33 percent of the wealth. For instance, in discussing the 1992 election, he states that 19% of voters
were unhappy with the choices given by the two major parties and protested against the choices they
were given by voting for Ross Perot. The question that came to my mind when I finished reading it
was this: Is the story of The United States a story about liberal democracy or a story about elite
power? Zinn’s message is clear: that this is an unjust situation created by powerful people. In 2009,
History aired The People Speak, an acclaimed documentary co-directed by Zinn, based on A People's
History and a companion volume, Voices of a People's History of the United States. This brings an
important question to light: Whose account of history have we been taught. And it is important to
remember this, since as a work of inquiry A People’s History of the United States has almost no
merit whatsoever. After Bacon’s death, the rebellion didn’t last long, and a man named Thomas
Grantham used “force and deception to disarm the last rebel forces”. I finally get it. The rich always
want to get richer at the expense of the poor. An inquirer will risk dense and dry writing to get her
point across; an advocate will risk simplification and generalization to get her point across. Perhaps at
times, but Columbus’ men also enslaved many of the natives and treated them with extreme hostility.
These experiences helped shape his opposition to war and passion for history. GIFs Highlight your
latest work via email or social media with custom GIFs. Perhaps at times, but Columbus’ men also
enslaved many of the natives and treated them with extreme hostility. Es una novela reveladora y a
veces puede parecer muy dura. Now, at a certain point, those areas with overlap, but for the most
part he seems less concerned with getting to a historical truth than preaching a message. Spaniards
did not see the huge genocide that was going on, they just saw the land they was stealing from the
natives and the money they were getting out of it. I also still have 15 days left before I have to return
the book so I kind of feel dumb now. At the next level, 10 tithing’s or 100 families, were grouped
together into a hundred. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. At the
lowest level were tithing’s, 10 families grouped together who assumed mutual responsibility for the
acts of their members. Most school textbooks paint Columbus as a hero, and either ignore his
genocidal crimes altogether or mention them very briefly. But it's been a long time since I took to the
streets. Error: Try Again Ok Sell Watchlist Expand Watch List Loading.

You might also like