Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Correlation Between The Degree of Hearing Loss and The
Correlation Between The Degree of Hearing Loss and The
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the correlation between the degree of hearing loss (HL) and the degrees of anxiety and depression in
patients with tinnitus. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved the use of basic clinical data from 600 enrolled patients with
tinnitus who visited the otolaryngology clinic in Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from April 2020 to June
2022. The tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) scale was used to assess the tinnitus status among the participants. The pure tone audiometry
(PTA) test was used to conduct audiological assessments for all patients to determine their hearing condition. The self-rating anxiety scale
(SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to assess the levels of anxiety and depression among the participants, respectively. The
correlation between the HL and anxiety/depression scores from the questionnaires was tested through Pearson correlation analysis. Results:
Among the 600 enrolled patients with tinnitus, most patients had mild-to-moderate degree of tinnitus, accounting for 248 cases (41.3%) and
179 cases (29.8%), respectively. PTA results showed that a large proportion of patients with tinnitus were accompanied with HL (467 cases,
77.8%). Among them, patients with mild HL accounted for the largest proportion with a total of 241 cases (40.2%). Based on the results of
SAS and SDS test, almost half of the patients had symptoms of anxiety and depression, accounting for 52.3% (314 cases) and 48.8% (293
cases), respectively. Similarly, patients with mild anxiety and depression occupy the largest proportion, accounting for 35.8% (215 cases) and
23% (138 cases), respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the degree of HL was closely related to THI/SAS/SDS scores
(P < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings indicate a strong positive correlation between the degree of HL and anxiety/depression scores in
patients with tinnitus.
Keywords: Tinnitus, Hearing loss, Anxiety, Depression, Self-rating anxiety scale, Self-rating depression scale
DOI: How to cite this article: Zhang L, Du H, You H. Correlation between the
10.4103/nah.nah_46_23 Degree of Hearing Loss and the Levels of Anxiety and Depression in
Patients with Tinnitus. Noise Health 2023;25:195-201.
varying degrees of HL. These symptoms caused by tinnitus incomplete clinical data. All patients were informed and
can seriously affect the daily life of patients.[11] signed informed consent for this study. This study was
approved by the.
Approximately 20% of tinnitus cases are severely
debilitating, making it difficult to perform daily activities Ethics Committee of the Hospital
and causing inconvenience to patients in their daily life.[4]
Tinnitus and mood disorders have a specific association.[12] The general data of patients in each group were collected,
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/nohe by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
Patients with tinnitus as their main symptom may develop including gender, age, tinnitus side, duration of tinnitus, and
mental comorbidities such as anxiety and depression. In the degree of the anxiety and depression. All patients completed
previous studies, depression and anxiety have been identified audiological assessment and Chinese version scales including
as the predictive factor for the chronic painful tinnitus.[13] the THI, SAS, and SDS test. Based on whether the patient has
experienced HL, the participants were divided into two groups,
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 02/29/2024
consisted of 20 projects, each divided into four levels. One For tinnitus and HL detection, the testers should be skilled in
point represents “no or very little time,” while four points operating the detection equipment, master the detection
means “most or all of the time.” The SAS is frequently used method, operate according to the standard operation
because of its reliability and validity.[22] The Cronbach’s method, and accurately record the test results. For the
alpha between items was 0.820.[23] The SAS standard score is completion of SAS and SDS scales, testers should make
the total score of each item multiplied by 1.25. The SAS patients fully understand the scoring rules of all scales and
standard score ≥50 represents anxiety state. Higher scores the specific meaning of each item, and make patients give true
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/nohe by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
indicate more severe anxiety. Grading was based on the answers in the test process, so that the measurement results
following SAS scores: mild anxiety level (50–59 points), are authentic and credible.
moderate anxiety level (60–69 points), and severe anxiety
level (≥70 points). Statistical Analysis
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 02/29/2024
SDS test was conducted to assess an individual’s depressive SPSS 23.0 statistical software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY,
behavior over the last week.[24] The SDS consisted of 20 USA) was utilized to analyses the included participants’
items, and each item was scored at four levels. One point clinical data (age). Figures 1 to 3 were made with Excel
means “no or very little time,” while four points means “most 2016 (Microsoft, DC, USA). The correction between HL and
or all of the time.” The Cronbach’s alpha between items was anxiety/depression scores from the questionnaires were tested
0.840.[23] The SDS standard score is the total score of each using Pearson correlation analysis. Continuous variables are
item multiplied by 1.25. The SDS standard score <53 presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while
represents no depression. Higher scores indicate more categorical variables are presented as number (n) and
severe depression. Grading was based on the following percentage (%).
SDS scores: mild depression level (53–62 points),
moderate anxiety level (63–72 points), and severe RESULTS
depression level (72 points). Patient Characteristics
Table 1 presents the patients’ general characteristics. Among
the 600 participants, 245 were female (40.8%). The patient’s
age is between 21 and 65 years with an average age of
Table 1: Patients’ Characteristics.
49.96 ± 10.11 years. Audiologic assessments results, the
Characteristics All patients n = 600 THI score, SAS, and SDS score classification were obtained.
Age (years, mean ± SD) 49.96 ± 10.11
Gender, n (%) Male 355 (59.2) Comparison of Tinnitus Status in Patients among
Female 245 (40.8) Groups with Different Degrees of Hearing Loss
Side of tinnitus, n (%) Right 135 (22.5)
Based on the data, Figure 1 shows the measurement results of
Left 205 (34.2)
tinnitus through the THI [Figure 1]. The results showed that
Bilateral 260 (43.3)
the THI rating of tinnitus in the normal group was better than
Duration of tinnitus (month) <3 months 195 (32.5)
3–6 months 68 (11.3)
the other four hearing impairment groups (MHL, Mod HL,
>6 months 337 (56.2)
SHL, PHL group). In the normal group, 131 patients (98.5%)
HL status, n (%) Control 133 (22.2) were classified under slight THI, and no patients were
Mild 241 (40.2) classified under severe or catastrophic THI. The THI
Moderate 130 (21.7) grading of tinnitus also differed among patients in
Severe 75 (12.5) different HL groups. In the MHL group, 232 patients were
Profound 21 (3.5) classified under mild THI, accounting for 96.3%. A large
THI scores, n (%) Slight 136 (22.7) percentage of patients in the Mod HL group had moderate
Mild 248 (41.3) THI (115 cases, 88.5%), 46 cases in the SHL group had
Moderate 179 (29.8) moderate THI (61.3%), and 13 cases in the PHL group had
Severe 24 (4.0) moderate THI (61.9%). In the SHL and PHL groups, more
Catastrophic 13 (2.2) patients with SHL experienced severe tinnitus, as known
SAS scores, n (%) Normal 286 (47.7) from THI results.
Mild 215 (35.8)
Moderate 87 (14.5)
Comparison of Self-rating Anxiety Scale Status in
Severe 12 (2.0)
SDS scores, n (%) Normal 307 (51.2)
Patients among Groups with Varying Degrees of
Mild 138 (23.0) Hearing Loss
Moderate 128 (21.3) Figure 2 shows the analysis of the SAS scores of each group.
Severe 27 (4.5) In the control group, 131 patients (98.5%) had normal SAS
SAS = self-rating anxiety scale, SDS = self-rating depression scale, grade and did not feel anxiety. In the MHL group, the SAS
THI = tinnitus handicap inventory. grades of normal and MHL groups were the highest,
150 131 SDS, and 9 patients (42.9%) had severe SDS. Similar to the
115
SAS score, the more severe the HL of patients with tinnitus,
100
the more severe the depression of patients.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/nohe by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
46
50 22
15 7 0 0 13 2 6
1100 5 400 0 00 00 Relationships between Hearing Loss Degree and
0
Control Mild HL Mod HL SHL PHL Anxiety/Depression/Tinnitus Levels
PTA results reflected the HL status. Normal hearing is
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 02/29/2024
120
Hearing Loss 100
80 73
64 57 57
The SDS scores of each group were analyzed to observe the 60
depression in different HL groups. As shown in Figure 3, in 40
18 12 9
the control group, 131 patients (98.5%) had normal SDS 20 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
grades. In the MHL group, the number of patients with SDS 0
Control Mild HL Mod HL SHL PHL
grade of normal was the largest, accounting for 73% (176
Normal Mild Moderate Severe
cases), followed by mild cases (64 cases, 26.6%). In the Mod
HL group, the SDS grade was mainly mild and moderate, Figure 3: Comparison of patients in different hearing loss (HL) groups
including 73 cases (56.2%) and 57 cases (43.8%), and control group in terms of self-rating depression scale (SDS).
respectively. In both the SHL and PHL groups, patients HL = hearing loss, PHL = profound HL, SHL = severe HL.
anxiety, depression, and tinnitus annoyance.[36,37] Based on 10. Park Y, Shin SH, Byun SW, Lee ZY, Lee HY. Audiological and
Pearson correlation analysis, HL can be associated with psychological assessment of tinnitus patients with normal hearing.
Front Neurol 2022;13:1102294.
emotional disorders in the participants, with a strong 11. Scheffer AR, Mondelli M. Tinnitus and hearing survey: cultural
correlation. Therefore, patients need to improve their adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol
lifestyle, change their mental state, relieve emotional 2021;87:28-34.
changes, and use drugs for tinnitus treatment. This study 12. Mohan A, Leong SL, De Ridder D, Vanneste S. Symptom dimensions
has certain limitations in terms of sample size and region, and to address heterogeneity in tinnitus. Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/nohe by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
2022;134:104542.
future studies with larger samples and more hospitals are 13. Wallhausser-Franke E, D’Amelio R, Glauner A, et al. Transition from
needed to further evaluate the clinical characteristics of acute to chronic tinnitus: predictors for the development of chronic
tinnitus patients. Our study was a retrospective study, and distressing tinnitus. Front Neurol 2017;8:605.
prospective studies can be carried out in the future for the 14. Langguth B, Landgrebe M, Kleinjung T, Sand GP, Hajak G. Tinnitus
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdtwnfKZBYtws= on 02/29/2024
treatment of HL in patients with tinnitus, such as wearing and depression. World J Biol Psychiatry 2011;12:489-500.
15. Molnar A, Mavrogeni P, Tamas L, Maihoub S. Correlation between
hearing aids, to explore the improvement of emotional tinnitus handicap and depression and anxiety scores. Ear Nose Throat J
disorders in patients. Accordingly, these results will reveal 2022 1455613221139211.
the correlation between hearing and emotion in patients with 16. Wang S, Cha X, Li F, et al. Associations between sleep disorders and
tinnitus. anxiety in patients with tinnitus: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol
2022;13:963148.
17. Goshtasbi K, Abouzari M, Risbud A, et al. Tinnitus and subjective
CONCLUSION hearing loss are more common in migraine: a cross-sectional NHANES
In conclusion, hearing impairment, anxiety, and depression analysis. Otol Neurotol 2021;42:1329-33.
caused by tinnitus cause great distress to patients, thus 18. Meng Z, Zheng Y, Liu S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese
(Mandarin) tinnitus handicap inventory. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol
affecting the quality of life and mental health of tinnitus 2012;5:10-6.
patients. Based on the results, the degree of HL and anxiety/ 19. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the tinnitus
depression scores have a close positive relationship in handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:
patients with tinnitus. 143-8.
20. Ma W, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. High-frequency hearing loss is associated
with anxiety and brain structural plasticity in older adults. Front Aging
Financial support and sponsorship Neurosci 2022;14:821537.
Nil. 21. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics
1971;12:371-9.
22. Shi C, Guo Y, Ma H, Zhang M. Psychometric validation of the 14-item
Conflicts of interest perceived stress scale in Chinese medical residents. Curr Psychol 2019;
There are no conflicts of interest. 38:1428-34.
23. Xiao C, Mou C, Zhou X. Effect of mindfulness meditation training on
anxiety, depression and sleep quality in perimenopausal women [in
REFERENCES Chinese]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Bao 2019; 39:998-1002.
1. Saeed S, Khan QU. The pathological mechanisms and treatments of 24. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry
tinnitus. Discoveries (Craiova) 2021;9:e137. 1965;12:63-70.
2. De Ridder D, Schlee W, Vanneste S, et al. Tinnitus and tinnitus 25. Langguth B, Landgrebe M, Schlee W, et al. Different patterns of
disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international hearing loss among tinnitus patients: a latent class analysis of a large
multidisciplinary proposal). Prog Brain Res 2021;260:1-25. sample. Front Neurol 2017;8:46.
3. Al-Lahham S, Nazzal Z, Massarweh A, et al. Prevalence and 26. Xiong B, Liu Z, Liu Q, et al. Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients
associated risk factors of tinnitus among adult Palestinians: a cross- with normal audiograms. Hear Res 2019;384:107826.
sectional study. Sci Rep 2022;12:20617. 27. Panahi R, Jalali MM, Joukar F, Maroufizadeh S, Naghipour M,
4. McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A Mansour-Ghanaei F. Prevalence of tinnitus and its associated factors
systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and in the PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol
severity. Hear Res 2016;337:70-9. 2023;35:29-38.
5. Zhang D, Xu Q, Caimino C, Baguley DM. The prevalence of tinnitus in 28. Waechter S. Association between hearing status and tinnitus distress.
China: a systematic review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol Acta Otolaryngol 2021;141:381-5.
2021;135:3-9. 29. Aazh H, Salvi R. The relationship between severity of hearing loss and
6. Langguth B, Kreuzer PM, Kleinjung T, De Ridder D. Tinnitus: causes subjective tinnitus loudness among patients seen in a specialist tinnitus
and clinical management. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:920-30. and hyperacusis therapy clinic in UK. J Am Acad Audiol 2019;30:712-
7. Hackenberg B, Doge J, O’Brien K, et al. Tinnitus and its relation to 9.
depression, anxiety, and stress-a population-based cohort study. J Clin 30. Belli S, Belli H, Bahcebasi T, Ozcetin A, Alpay E, Ertem U.
Med 2023;12:1169. Assessment of psychopathological aspects and psychiatric
8. Oosterloo BC, Croll PH, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Ikram MK, comorbidities in patients affected by tinnitus. Eur Arch
Goedegebure A. Prevalence of tinnitus in an aging population and Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:279-85.
its relation to age and hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 31. Salazar JW, Meisel K, Smith ER, Quiggle A, McCoy DB, Amans MR.
2021;164:859-68. Depression in patients with tinnitus: a systematic review. Otolaryngol
9. Haines RH, Hepburn T, Tan W, et al. Effectiveness and cost Head Neck Surg 2019;161:28-35.
effectiveness of digital hearing aids in patients with tinnitus and 32. Bhatt JM, Bhattacharyya N, Lin HW. Relationships between tinnitus
hearing loss: a randomised feasibility trial (THE HUSH Trial). Pilot and the prevalence of anxiety and depression. Laryngoscope
Feasibility Stud 2022;8:235. 2017;127:466-9.
33. Niemann U, Brueggemann P, Boecking B, Mazurek B, Spiliopoulou 36. Ketterer MC, Häussler SM, Hildenbrand T, et al. Binaural hearing
M. Development and internal validation of a depression severity rehabilitation improves speech perception, quality of life, tinnitus
prediction model for tinnitus patients based on questionnaire distress, and psychological comorbidities. Otol Neurotol 2020;41:
responses and socio-demographics. Sci Rep 2020;10:4664. e563-74.
34. Kumbul YC, Isik U, Kilic F, Sivrice ME, Akin V. Evaluation of anxiety 37. Suzuki N, Shinden S, Oishi N, et al. Effectiveness of hearing aids in
sensitivity, anxiety, depression, and attention deficit hyperactivity treating patients with chronic tinnitus with average hearing levels of
disorder in patients with tinnitus. Noise Health 2022;24:13-9. <30 dBHL and no inconvenience due to hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol
35. Mazurek B, Böcking B, Dobel C, Rose M, Brüggemann P. Tinnitus and 2021;141:773-9.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/nohe by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW