Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture - 3 Animal Models
Lecture - 3 Animal Models
Lecture - 3 Animal Models
Introduction
Definition
History
Need for animal models
Categories of animal models
Classification
Model selection
Species selection
Animal models used in periodontal research
Advantages in periodontal research
Limitations in periodontal studies
Controversies
The 3R Principle
Arrive guidelines
Criteria for humane death
Conclusion
References
INTRODUCTION
In the 1920s, “experimental epidemiology” meant the study of
epidemics among colonies of experimental animals such as rats and
mice.
Weggler in 1983 defined an animal model as a living organism with an
inherited, naturally acquired, or induced pathological process that in one or
more respects closely resembles the same phenomenon in men.
1957, Laika..
For ethical reasons, initiation and progression of periodontal disease as
well as certain types of periodontal treatment cannot be studied in
humans. Animal data can provide us with models of biologic trends
before proceeding to human application.
Inability to examine initiation and progression of periodontal diseases has
led to a great interest in the use of animal models in periodontal
research. Human longitudinal studies of periodontal disease pose many
problems such as determining the level of disease activity, individuals at
risk, and susceptibility of disease progression.
Periodontal diseases can only be studied retrospectively in man, since reliable
clinical markers for ongoing tissue destruction (disease activity) are not
available. Therefore, an animal model in which selected microbiological and
immunological parameters can be studied prospectively is desirable.
INDUCED / EXPERIMENTAL MODELS
SPONTANEOUS / NATURAL MODELS
NEGATIVE / NON REACTIVE MODELS
ORPHAN MODELS
(Davidson et al 1987)
CLASSIFICATION
(Page &Schroeder 1982)
I. Small rodents
E. g: Mice, Rats, Hamsters, Minks.
IV. Others
E. g: Apes, Cats, Horses, Guinea pigs, Mongooses, Wolves, Foxes,
Rabbits, Ferret etc.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF ANIMAL
MODELS
1) appropriateness as an analog,
2) transferability of information,
3) genetic uniformity of organisms, where applicable,
4) background knowledge of biological properties,
5) cost and availability,
6) generalizability of the results,
7) ease of and adaptability to experimental manipulation,
8) ecological consequences, and
9) ethical implications
CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIES
SELECTION:
Availability of laboratory facilities
Presence of a breeding colony
Cost
Ease of handling
Ease of housing
Relatedness to humans
Limitations imposed by the size of oral structures
Availability of appropriately sized periodontal instrument
CONTROVERSIES
The use of animals for research and testing purposes has decreased substantially
during the last two decades but is now increasing again, mainly because of the
increased use of transgenic animal models.
Presently, 10-12 millions of vertebrate animals are used per year within EU
Member States.
Scientists who are using animals in research are frequently criticized by animal
protection groups and blamed that they do not respect the integrity of an animal's
life.
A study of 20 reviews of animal tests’ accuracy found that only two concluded
that the animal tests were consistent with the human findings or had contributed
significantly to developing new treatments.
The animal activists do not appreciate the use of animals in biological studies.
They are equating cruelty to animals committed by animal experiments
conducted for scientific investigations.
THE “3 Rs” OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
REPLACEMENT
REDUCTION
REFINEMENT
(RUSSEL AND BURCH,1959)
ARRIVE GUIDELINES
CRITERIA FOR A HUMANE DEATH
Death without signs of panic, pain or distress.
Minimum time to loss of consciousness.
Safety for personnel involved
Minimal undesirable physiological and psychological effect on animal
Minimal or no emotional effects on the observer and the operator
A location remote from animal rooms
CONCLUSION
No genuine analogue of the various forms of human periodontitis
exists in animals.
A gold standard animal model in periodontology does not exist since
every application requires a model that fills specific needs.
Experimental models for periodontal diseases are essential for
understanding the origin and evolution of the pathology in humans.
The use of animal models in periodontal research is a necessary step
prior to entering into clinical trials with new biomaterials and
treatments.
The anatomy, physiology and pathogenicity of experimental models
should relate as much as possible to those of patients in order to
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new biomaterials or treatments
in periodontal regeneration.
REFERENCES
Amit Bhardwaj, Shalu V. Bhardwaj Contribution of Animal Models in
Periodontal Research IJAVMS, Vol. 6, Issue 3, 2012: 150-157
Xavier Struillou, Hervé Boutigny, Assem Soueidan, and Pierre
Layrolle,E xperimental Animal Models in Periodontology: A Review
The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, 4, 37-47
Carlos Albuquerque, Francisco Morinha, João Requicha,Teresa
Martins, Isabel Dias Canine periodontitis: The dog as an important
model for periodontal studiesique .
Guedes-Pinto , Estela Bastos, Carlos Viegas The Veterinary Journal
191 (2012) 299–305
Ashwini Ashok Apine and Shiva Prasad BM. Current Status of Animal
Experimentation in the Study of Periodontal Diseases and Therapeutics.
Research and Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences