Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UG Course Outline 3rd Semester Civil Liberties Compulsory
UG Course Outline 3rd Semester Civil Liberties Compulsory
COURSE OUTLINE
SEMESTER – III
Course Credit: 4
Nanditta Batra
Rishika Khare
1
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
This course aims to introduce students to the constitutional framework on civil liberties and
a critical appraisal of how this framework has been in operation for the last 72 years. This
course will seek to facilitate a discussion on the social context inherent in how the substance
of the civil liberties have been conceptualized and in how such liberties have been
interpreted. We will also examine how our imagination of specific civil liberties have been
adjusted with changing times. Students will be required to reflect on the chequered history
TEACHING METHODOLOGY
The course teaching methodology will consist of Socratic Method of thinking to ignite
critical thinking in students; lecture and discussion method; case study method; and flipped
classroom to encourage self-learning in students. Reading material for every lecture is
supplied with the lecture plan. Students are required to study the reading material before
appearing for the class.
2
SCHEME OF EVALUATION
Assessment will aim at continuous and comprehensive evaluation. Evaluation will be spread
across the following components –
COURSE STRUCTURE
Module No. Module title Hours
Total Hours 64
3
COURSE OUTLINE AND TEACHING PLAN
4
LECTURE 4- Locating the 'State' - Defining the State, Changing Scope in initial years
Readings
● Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal & Ors., AIR 1967 SC 1857
(Access Here)
● Sabhajit Tewary v. Union of India, AIR 1975 SC 1329 (Access Here)
LECTURE 6 - Locating the 'State' and the Boundaries of Fundamental Rights - Private
Actors and Public Interest, 'Law' in article 13
Reading
● Gautam Bhatia, ‘The Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgment’ (Indian
Constitutional Law and Philosophy, 22 August 2017) (Access Here)
5
● Raksha Kumar, ‘Should India’s Parliament have the authority to amendment even the
“basic structure” of the Constitution’, (Scroll 28 April, 2018) (Access Here)
● Alok Prasanna Kumar, ‘On Maratha Reservation Judgement-Part 1’ LVI (21) EPW
2021, 10 (Access Here)
6
● Indicators of Social and Economic Backwardness - Mandal Commission Report
Summary (Access from the Reading Material)
● Rangin Tripathy, ‘Reservation as a Right: The Supreme Court is both wrong and right
on the government’s discretion to implement quota’ (Bar and Bench 12 February
2020) (Access Here)
● Kailash Jeenger, ‘The Supreme Court Must Note That Reservation Is a Fundamental
Rights’, (The Wire 13 July 2020) (Access Here)
● Anurag Bhaskar, ‘Reservation Efficiency and the Making of the Indian Constitution’
LVI (19) EPW 2021, 42 (Access Here)
● ‘Testing Merit’ in the Caste of Merit by Ajantha Subramanian (Harvard University
Press, 2019) (Access from the Reading Material)
● Kiran Kumbhar, ‘The Myth of the Mysterious Doctor’ (The Indian Forum 2nd
December 2021) (Access Here)
LECTURE 14 - Abolishing Untouchability - SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989
Readings
● Jesús Francisco Cháirez-Garza, ‘B.R. Ambedkar, Franz Boas and the Rejection of
Racial Theories of Untouchability’ 41(2) J. of South Asian Studies 281 (Access from
the Reading Material)
● Neerad Pandharipande, ‘SC verdict upholding Centre’s amendments to SC/ST
Atrocities Act restores law’s original intent, corrects flawed 2018 judgement’
(Firstpost 13 February 2020) (Access Here)
● J. Chandrachud’s Judgement in Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala
(2019) 11 SCC 1 (Access Here)
7
● Rangin Pallav Tripathy, ‘Why the Supreme Court’s assault on the right to protest is
fundamentally undemocratic’ (Scroll, 7 October, 2021) (Access Here)
● Agij Promotions of Nineteenonea Media Pvt Ltd. v Union of India, WP Np. 14172 of
2021 (Access Here)
● Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, (2014) 4 SCC 257 (Access Here)
● Shweta Venkatesan & Priyesh Mishra, ‘Bombay HC order on IT Rules is a start. But
its critical eye has missed a greater threat’ (The Print 27 August 2021) (Access Here)
● Kedar Nath Singh v State of Bihar , 1962 AIR 955 (Access Here)
● Ashish Goel, ‘The Cost of Regulating fake news’ (Times of India 25 June 2021)
(Access Here)
LECTURE 19 - Fundamental Rights and Criminal Justice Process (Art. 20 & 22) - Ex-Post
Facto Laws, Self-Incrimination, Double Jeopardy, Preventive Detention
Readings
8
● “Privacy and Criminal Process: Selvi v. State of Karnataka” in Gautam Bhatia,
Transformative Constitution (Harper Collings, 2019) 299 (Access from the Reading
Material)
● Gautam Bhatia, ‘Preventive detention must be used judiciously’ (Hindustan Times 3
July 2018) (Access Here)
● Hathisingh Manufacturing Co. v. Union of India, AIR 1960 SC 923 (Access Here)
LECTURE 20 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty – ‘Life’ and ‘Procedure Established by
Law’
Readings
● Gautam Bhatia, Under a Humane Constitution (The Hindu, 13 March 2018) (Access
Here)
LECTURE 22 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty - New frontiers of Article 21- Data
protection, Mass surveillance and Facial Recognition, Right to be Forgotten, Rights animals,
9
Readings
Apoorva Mandhani, ‘Do you have a ‘right to be forgotten’? Here’s what it means and
how Indian courts view it’ (The Print 27 May 2021) (Access Here)
Seema Chishti, ‘Beyond Pegasus: The story of State Surveillance in India’ (The
Bastion 15 March 2022) (Access Here)
Rights of Animals - Suhrith Parthasarathi, The jallikattu challenge (The Hindu 13
February 2018) (Access Here)
● People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1473 (Access
Here)
● Association of Medical Super Speciality Aspirants and Doctors v Union of India,
(2019) 8 SCC 607 (Access Here)
LECTURE 24 - Freedom of Religion - The Right to Practice, Profess and Propagate, Testing
Religiosity (Essential and Non-Essential Practices)
Reading
● Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1 (Access Here)
● Dilip Mandal, The real issue in Karnataka Hijab row is how secularism is defined
wrongly - Nehru to Modi’, (The Print 11 Feb., 2022) (Access Here)
10
LECTURE 26– Freedom of Religion – An Experiment with Secularism
Reading
● Pritam Singh, ‘Hindu Bias in India's ‘Secular’ Constitution: probing flaws in the
instruments of governance’, 26(6) Third World Quarterly 2005, 909 DOI:
10.1080/01436590500089281 (Access from the Reading Material)
● Apoorva Mandhani, ‘Private Schools to decide fees, but state can’t interfere in the
name of COVID, SC tells Rajasthan’, (The Print, 4 March 2021 (Access Here)
11
● Anuj Bhuwania, The Case that Felled a City: Examining the Politics of Indian Public
Interest Litigation through One Case (Access Here)
LECTURE 31 – The Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Duties
● Faizan Mustafa, ‘Piecemeal reforms the way for Uniform Civil Code’ (Deccan
Herald 8 May 2022) (Access Here)
● Komal Deol, ‘Cow protection was a sensitive subject in India even when the
Constitution was being framed’ (The Scroll, 7 July 2021) (Access Here)
12