Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exercises 7 MANOVA Field Eds 4 and 5
Exercises 7 MANOVA Field Eds 4 and 5
a. Indicate which variables you have and whether these are DVs or IVs.
IV1: Breastfeeding
DV1:Verbal IQ
DV2 Performance IQ
b. Write down the null hypothesis for the MANOVA. Run the MANOVA (SPSS: Analyze –
General Linear Model - Multivariate) and test the null hypothesis. Can the null
hypothesis be rejected?
Multivariate Testsa
Hypothesis Partial Eta
Effect Value F df Error df Sig. Squared
Interce Pillai's Trace .995 9641.72 2.000 104.000 <.001 .995
b
pt 4
Wilks' Lambda .005 9641.72 2.000 104.000 <.001 .995
b
4
Hotelling's 185.418 9641.72 2.000 104.000 <.001 .995
b
Trace 4
Roy's Largest 185.418 9641.72 2.000 104.000 <.001 .995
b
Root 4
group Pillai's Trace .217 6.387 4.000 210.000 <.001 .108
Wilks' Lambda .787 6.619b 4.000 208.000 <.001 .113
Hotelling's .266 6.848 4.000 206.000 <.001 .117
Trace
Roy's Largest .246 12.923c 2.000 105.000 <.001 .198
Root
a. Design: Intercept + group
b. Exact statistic
c. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance level.
P>0.05 The null hypothesis of no interactions can be rejected
The factor of means are equal to different breastfeeding
group
c. What homogeneity assumption needs to be tested? Write down the null hypothesis. To
run the corresponding test, go to General Linear Model – Multivariate, and click on the
Options button to include homogeneity tests. Is the assumption violated?
Box's Test of
Equality of
Covariance
Matricesa
Box's M 3.640
F .588
df1 6
df2 65169.012
Sig. .740
Tests the null
hypothesis that the
observed
covariance matrices
of the dependent
variables are equal
across groups.
a. Design: Intercept
+ group
The null hypothesis of homogeneity of subpopulation covariance ma- trices cannot be rejected
d. Do the three groups differ on each of the (separate) IQ measures? Provide the null
hypotheses and the test results.
e.
2. Do it yourself! Begin with creating a data file Patients.sav. There are 9 patients who suffer
from agoraphobia (i.e., a psychological disorder which consists of anxiety in environments
that are unfamiliar or where the patient perceives to have little control). These patients are
randomly assigned to one of two treatments: treatment 1 consists of psychodynamic
therapy and treatment 2 consists of exposure therapy. After the treatment two variables are
measured that are related to treatment effect: Satisfaction (SA, measured on a scale from
0-12, higher score means higher satisfaction) and Self-acceptance (CSA measured on a
scale from 0-12, higher score means higher self-acceptance). The scores on SA and CSA for
both groups are:
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
SA CSA SA CSA
1 3 4 6
3 7 6 8
2 2 6 8
5 10
5 10
4 6
Hence, there are three variables: group (with values 1 and 2), satisfaction and self-
acceptance. The research question is whether the effect of the two treatments is the same
or that one treatment leads to better results than the other. Perform the appropriate
analyses and write down your conclusions. Don’t forget to check the assumptions!
Multivariate Testsa
Partial Eta
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Squared
b
Intercept Pillai's Trace .945 51.207 2.000 6.000 <.001 .945
b
Wilks' Lambda .055 51.207 2.000 6.000 <.001 .945
Hotelling's Trace 17.069 51.207b 2.000 6.000 <.001 .945
Roy's Largest Root 17.069 51.207b 2.000 6.000 <.001 .945
b
group Pillai's Trace .750 9.000 2.000 6.000 .016 .750
b
Wilks' Lambda .250 9.000 2.000 6.000 .016 .750
Hotelling's Trace 3.000 9.000b 2.000 6.000 .016 .750
Roy's Largest Root 3.000 9.000b 2.000 6.000 .016 .750
The null hypothesis of homogeneity of subpopulation covariance ma- trices cannot be rejected
The DV’s are the gains in knowledge of body parts, letters, forms and numbers. Knowledge
of body parts (pre- and posttest) is measured on a scale from 0-32; knowledge of letters
(pre- and posttest) on a scale from 0-58; knowledge of forms (pre- and posttest) on a scale
from 0-20; and knowledge of numbers (pre- and posttest) on a scale from 0-54.
a. Screen the data for out-of-range values (i.e., values that are not possible given the
ranges provided above). For interval variables, you can do this by looking at the
descriptive statistics (check minimum and maximum values). For categorical variables
you can do this by checking the frequencies. If you find any problem, fix it.
Descriptive Statistics
viewcat Mean Std. Deviation N
gainumber 1 4.7857 8.17293 14
2 6.4737 8.46803 19
3 9.4118 19.44552 34
4 12.7500 8.58778 28
Total 9.1263 13.60401 95
body 1 2.0714 5.73068 14
2 2.6842 5.28155 19
3 4.5000 5.69556 34
4 4.2143 5.01374 28
Total 3.6947 5.42271 95
form 1 3.2857 3.68841 14
2 3.7895 3.04738 19
3 3.8824 3.38235 34
4 4.4286 2.71387 28
Total 3.9368 3.15153 95
let 1 1.4286 10.36796 14
2 8.0000 10.17076 19
3 16.7353 13.25807 34
4 17.7143 11.11841 28
Total 13.0211 12.98279 95
c. Write down the null hypothesis for the MANOVA with the gain scores.
The null hypothesis of homogeneity of subpopulation covariance ma- trices cannot be rejected
f. What are the null hypotheses for the separate ANOVAs? What is your conclusion?
g. Test the assumption of homogeneity of variances for each separate DV? What is your
conclusion?
h. What else do you need to finish your conclusion? Finish up.