60-01-11-2617 Rev 00

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 121

FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

S. No. Page No. / Clause No. COMPANY Comments CONSULTANT Response Status / Remarks

No mention of Gas Injection Compressor for WAG Noted, please refer to Section 11.8 of
1. CRS Rev B Item No. 13
wells in the report. Consultant to include the same. the revised report.

The CDS design shall cover entire


Consultant to note that variation in the well fluid production profile (from maximum oil and
composition +/- 10% in the mol. weight is not gas to maximum water case), in which
2. CRS Rev B Item No. 17
addressed in the report. the well fluid composition ranges from 23
This needs to be addressed. – 40 (MW). Please refer to section 6.5
for details.

PW Disposal well pressure is revised as 400 psig.


Hence, new pump is required for PWRI to meet the Noted, this is updated in the revised
3. CRS Rev B Item No. 30
injection pressure of 2000 psig. document.
Report to be updated inline with the above.

4. CRS Rev B Item No. 31 WAG related study is not addressed in the report. Refer response to item no. 1.

Slug Catcher is deleted irrespective of Flow Assurance


Noted, Slug Catcher is already removed
5. CRS Rev B Item No. 33 Study. Report to be update inline with this
from the report in Rev B.
development.

Consultant to note that variation in the well fluid


composition +/- 10% in the mol. weight is not
6. CRS Rev B Item No. 35 Refer response to item no. 2.
addressed in the report.
This needs to be addressed.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

Comment is no more valid as the Slug Catcher is


7. CRS Rev B Item No. 44 Noted.
deleted as an outcome from VE workshop.

The equal distribution is achieved via


Further discussion required with Consultant regarding symmetrical distribution from dedicated
8. CRS Rev B Item No. 45
equal flow distribution to each train. inlet manifold to each oil processing
train.

Noted, the water content is revised to


Discussion required as none of the ADNOC Onshore 5% v/v as agreed with COMPANY;
9. CRS Rev B Item No. 46
Facilities has this spec which is highly conservative. however, 1st and 2nd Stage Separator
sizing are based on 2% v/v.

Consultant to review the pressure drop between 1st


Noted, the pressure drop is increased to
stage and 2nd stage Desalter. 15 psig is very tight
10. CRS Rev B Item No. 49 30 psig, refer to the Hydraulic Report for
considering the piping runs and associated fittings
details.
such as Static Mixer, Tee Mixing, PDCV etcD

Comment is no more valid as Slug Catcher is deleted


11. CRS Rev B Item No. 51 Noted.
as an outcome from VE workshop.

In this option, installing the header d/s of LP Separator


12. CRS Rev B Item No. 55 will minimize heat duty. However, no further discussion Noted.
is required as this option is not accepted by Company.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


In case of off spec oil scenario, the
abnormal is detected in the respective
Oil Processing Train. The Operator shall
try to address it online as first approach.
If the situation persists the train shall be
shutdown to conduct and adequate root
case/ maintenance or repair work if
deemed necessary. The off spec product
shall be routed to one of the two or three
FSTs during the intervention time /
reaction time.
Dewatering pump capacity is only 25 m3/hr. This is
only for the purpose of transferring accumulated water. The other Oil processing train(s) shall be
13. CRS Rev B Item No. 57
Dewatering pump will not help. Consultant to review routed to another tank and continue the
and update accordingly. normal operation.

The off spec product, assuming one tank


at full capacity can be diverted back to
process smoothly within 2-3 days using
the dewatering pumps in parallel if
required during a short period of time.
The total flowrate with the two pumps in
parallel (50 m3/h) is equivalent to a 10%
of the oil flowrate capacity of one Oil
processing train which is adequate in
Consultant’s view.

Discussed with COMPANY, the HYSYS


V9 is used for the project per the
14. CRS Rev B Item No. 63 To be discussed and agreed.
approved Engineering Management
Plan (Doc. No. 60-99-90-2604) Rev 00.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


This info is not required anymore as the
dehydration temperature is now set
15. CRS Rev B Item No. 86 Consultant to formalize through TQ at the earliest.
based on ADCO Process Design
Guideline (Doc. No. 30-99-11-0008).

Noted. Please mention TVP data in Process Simulation Noted, TVP is provided in the Process
16. CRS Rev B Item No. 89
Report, if it is not specified. Simulation Report.

Discussed with COMPANY, the


allocated delta T is intended to protect
the HO for start-up, normal, and upset
cases. During start-up, the operating
17. CRS Rev B Item No. 91 To be discussed with Company.
temperature of HO is expected to be 20
– 30% higher than the normal operating
temperature. This is included in the
revised report.

Noted. Please mention TVP data in Process Simulation Noted, TVP is provided in the Process
18. CRS Rev B Item No. 95
Report, if it is not specified. Simulation Report.

Noted. Please mention TVP data in Process Simulation Noted, TVP is provided in the Process
19. CRS Rev B Item No. 101
Report, if it is not specified. Simulation Report.

Slug Catcher is deleted irrespective of Flow Assurance


20. CRS Rev B Item No. 106 Study. Report to be update inline with this Noted.
development.

21. CRS Rev B Item No. 107 Refer response for Point No. 106. Noted.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


It is not suggested to spike the condensate in the
Noted, this Option is ruled out (deleted)
22. CRS Rev B Item No. 117 ASAB MOL line as it needs approval from ADNOC
as requested.
Onshore.

Some VE recommendations not incorporated. Shall be


23. Page 1 Noted.
incorporated in the next revision.

As discussed with COMPANY, PW


24. Page 2 1. Mention HOLD for PW Degassing Drum. Degassing Drum is deleted from the
designed.
2. Do not use “Prospect A/B” etc. please use Al
25. Page 2 Noted and incorporated.
Humrah, Bu Tasah etc.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

3. It is observed that Stabilizer Vs Stripper option


study and TEG based GDU Vs MEG Injection
System are analyzed separately. Consultant to
analyze the above study considering an integrated
system as mentioned below:

Option-1: Stabilizer + Compressor System (LP/HP)


+ TEG Based GDU

Option-2: Stripper + Compressor (LP/HP) + DPCU


(It is suggested to name it as DPCU instead of
MEG Injection)
Noted, this is updated in the revised
26. Page 2
Option-3: LP Separator (Can be retained as it is as report.
it is not recommended by COMPANY for further
assessments)

The results, CAPEX, OPEX shall be provided


considering the integrated system as each unit is
interlinked with other unit. This methodology will
give better understanding than the one presented
currently in this report.

Results, CAPEX, OPEX are available in isolation


and it is suggested to integrate all the results as
mentioned above.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

4. Also, it is observed that the Heat Exchanger


Analysis is carried out without considering the
complete HEX network. Currently, the results and
recommendation is arrived by analyzing the stand-
alone HEX (without considering the other HEX in
the network). CONSULTANT to carry out the
complete HEX network analysis as an integrated
system and produce the results and
recommendation accordingly.

IT IS SUGGESTED TO DISCUSS WITH


COMPANY REGARDING HEX NETWORK
ANALYSIS PRIOR TO CONCLUDE AND
PROCEED WITH DOWNSTREAM ACTIVITIES
INORDER TO AVOID REWORK AND SCHEDULE
27. Page 2 Noted and updated in the revised report.
IMPACT. INCASE OF CHANGES IN HEX
NETWORK AS AN OUTCOME OF THIS STUDY,
IT IS CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
UPDATE ALL DOWNSTREAM DELIVERABLES
WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST AND SCHEDULE.

ALSO, IT IS TO BE NOTED THAT HEX


NETWORK ANALYSIS TO BE CARRIED OUT
BASED ON THE LATEST CDS ARRIVAL
TEMPERATURE (Pipesim Results). Currently,
CDS arrival temperature is considered as 135°F
(Summer) and 86°F (Winter). Whereas, as per
the Pipesim Results, the arrival temperature at
CDS is estimated to be 109°F (Summer) and 75°F
(Winter).
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

5. CONSULTANT to note that the HEX analysis


(requirement of Stabilized Crude Cooler, Utilization
of Stabilized crude heat in the Wet Crude Heater,
Use of wash water heater etc.) shall be carried out
for both Summer & Winter cases with the current
simulation scheme (i.e. 202°F at reboiler) and with
28. Page 2 Noted and updated in the revised report.
the higher temperature at reboiler (optimum
temperature higher than 202°F, may be about
220°F/230°F) and arrive at the conclusion and
recommendation. The analysis will only be
complete if we carry out the simulation and HTRI
analysis for all the applicable cases.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

6. Regarding the requirement of wash water heater,


Consultant has carried out only CAPEX for Wash
Water Heater Vs the incremental temperature due
to heat recovery. The temperature increase due to
recovery is estimated as 3.1°F (1.7°C) will have
considerable heat content in the crude oil.

Mass flow of Crude inlet to 2nd stage Desalter =


396000 kg/hr (72000 BOPD with a density of 830
kg/m3)
This section is updated in the revised
report based on the discussion with
29. Page 2 Specific Heat of Crude = 2 Kj/kg K (assumed)
COMPANY. Please refer to the revised
report for details.
Heat Content = m cp delta T = 396000 x 2 x 1.7 =
374 kWhr

Consultant to note that its not only just 3.1°F


temperature increment, but also the overall heat
content in the crude. COMPANY expects overall
analysis as explained above to conclude the
requirement of Wash Water Heater instead of
carrying out stand-alone assessment for wash
water heater alone.

30. Page 3 Include Aquifer Water Injection spec. Noted and incorporated.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

Is it symmetrical or one manifold per train? Rephrase it


31. Page 4 Noted and incorporated.
accordingly.

Rephrase: the separated gas from 2nd Stage


32. Page 4 Noted and incorporated.
Separator is routed to LP 2nd Stage Compression.

Elaborate this section. Recycle water from 2nd Stage


33. Page 4 Noted and incorporated.
Desalter is sent back to 1st Stage Desalter.
This is updated to Recovered gas from
34. Page 5 Delete: and Recovered gas from Flare Gas (purge) Flare Gas Recovery Ejectors Package in
the revised report.

35. Page 5 Please mention WAG Pressure. Noted and incorporated.

The statement is rephrased, however


PW Skim Tanks are not meant for solid removal. Company to note that removal of the oil
36. Page 5
Please clarify. implies an indirect removal of the total
suspended solids (carryover effect).
Replace Skim Tanks as Produced Water Skim Tanks
37. Page 5 Noted and incorporated.
for consistency (Typical Comments).

Rephrase: The overall process scheme for Central


38. Page 6 Noted and incorporated.
Degassing Station Configuration is presented overleaf.

39. Page 12, section 2.0 Replace: configuration with process scheme. Noted and incorporated.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

DPCU is not required to be assessed as it is already


Noted, this is deleted from the revised
40. Page 12, section 2.0 covered as part of Gas Dehydration Process Study
report.
(MEG Injection Option).

41. Page 15, section 5.0 Mention H2S range also if it is applicable. Noted, not applicable.

42. Page 15, section 6.0 The basis of the study is based on Basis of Design D Noted and incorporated.

Refer Process Simulation Report for comments on


43. Page 16, section 6.2 Noted and incorporated.
Section 6.0.

44. Page 17, Table 6.2.1 Add: Dry Basis. Noted and incorporated.

45. Page 21, section 6.3 Replace: well flowrates with reservoir flowrates Noted and incorporated.

It is suggested to reproduce the Crude Blending


provided in Process Simulation Report instead of Noted, this section is updated per
46. Page 24, section 6.5
shorten in. in principle, this document is prior activity Process Simulation Report.
than Process Simulation.

The gas export rate and produced water rate of 75


This section is updated in the revised
47. Page 25, Note 1 MMSCFD is achieved proportionally based on
report.
production profile D

Reproduce the same content given in Process


48. Page 25, section 6.5 Noted.
Simulation Report.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


Noted, site conditions will be provided in
In PDB, the Site Conditions is referred to BEDD. In this PDB in next revision; however, site
49. Page 26, section 7.0 document it is given. It is suggested to provide the Site conditions will not be deleted from this
Conditions in PDB rather than referring to BEDD. report to avoid rework (i.e. renumbering
the sections, tables and figures).

50. Page 30, Note 1 Delete: only MEG acting as Noted and incorporated.

Add: MEG injection is used to suppress the hydration


51. Page 30, Note 1 Noted and incorporated.
formation.
Include the following parameter also:

LP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MMSCFD)


LP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MW)
LP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MMSCFD)
LP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MW)
52. Page 31, Table 11.2.1.1 Noted and incorporated.
LP Gas Compressor 3rd stage (MMSCFD)
LP Gas Compressor 3rd stage (MW)
HP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MMSCFD)
HP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MW)
HP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MMSCFD)
HP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MW)
The reference temperature for TVP is
Is TVP at 37.8 °C or at operating conditions. Please
53. Page 31, Table 11.2.1.1 37.8 °C. This is updated in the revised
mention the reference temperature for TVP.
report.
Add a note to reflect the method of estimating the Oil
54. Page 31, Table 11.2.1.1 Noted and incorporated.
Recovery.

55. Page 31, section 11.2.1 Is it total duty or per unit? Noted and updated.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

56. Page 31, section 11.2.1 Is it 2 x 50% or 2 x 100%? Review and update. Noted and updated.

Delete Advantages & Disadvantage sections as it is


57. Page 32, section 11.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
provided in Table 11.2.4.1 (Section 11.2.4).
Include the following parameter also:

LP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MMSCFD)


LP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MW)
LP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MMSCFD)
LP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MW)
58. Page 33 Table 11.2.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
LP Gas Compressor 3rd stage (MMSCFD)
LP Gas Compressor 3rd stage (MW)
HP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MMSCFD)
HP Gas Compressor 1st stage (MW)
HP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MMSCFD)
HP Gas Compressor 2nd stage (MW)
Is TVP at 37.8 °C or at operating conditions. Please
59. Page 33 Table 11.2.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
mention the reference temperature for TVP.
Add a note to reflect the method of estimating the Oil
60. Page 33 Table 11.2.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
Recovery.
Delete Advantages & Disadvantage sections as it is
61. Page 33, section 11.2.2 Noted and incorporated.
provided in Table 11.2.4.1 (Section 11.2.4).
Intent is to recover the HC from Stripper off-gas using
the DPCU Process. MEG is used in this process to
62. Page 34, section 11.2.2 prevent the hydrate formation. It is appropriate to Noted and incorporated.
name it as DPCU / HC Recovery instead of MEG
Injection.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


Instead of naming it as GDU (MEG), it is suggested to
63. Page 34, section 11.2.2 Noted and incorporated.
name it as DPCU.
Rephrase: D HC condensate collected in the Glycol
Flash Drum is sent to the HC Condensate Strippers
64. Page 34, section 11.2.2 Noted and incorporated.
for stabilization. The recovered stabilized HC
condensate is injected in the MOL.
Mention that this section to be read in-conjunction with
65. Page 34, section 11.2.2 Noted and incorporated.
Section 11.4.2 (MEG Injection System).

66. Page 35, Figure 11.2.2.2 Replace: Glycol Flash Drum with Cold Separator. Noted and incorporated.

67. Page 35, Table 11.2.2.3 Use the same description used in Table 11.2.2.1. Noted and incorporated.

The recovery published in Rev B is


Why the oil recovery is different from the Stripper
based on recovery at CDS not at
68. Page 35, Table 11.2.2.3 option? In principle, it should be same. Consultant to
stripper column. This is updated in the
clarify. Discussion required.
revised report.

69. Page 35, Table 11.2.2.3 Provide TVP also. Noted and incorporated.

70. Page 35, Table 11.2.2.3 Mention crude oil recovery in BOPD. Noted and incorporated.

The RVP of unstabilized crude is already


provided in Rev B, refer to RVP at HC
71. Page 36, Table 11.2.2.3 Specify RVP of unstabilized condensate.
Condensate Stripper. TVP is also
provided in this revision.

72. Page 36, Table 11.2.2.3 Add: oil + condensate for combined RVP Noted and incorporated.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


Add a note that overhead gas from Condensate
73. Page 36, Table 11.2.2.3 Stripper will be used as fuel gas. Also, mention the Noted and incorporated.
pressure of the overhead gas.

74. Page 36, Table 11.2.2.3 Mention the quantity of export gas after HC recovery. Noted and incorporated.

75. Page 38, Table 11.2.4.1 Delete advantages no. 3 of option 1. Noted and incorporated.

Add: Compatible for well fluid composition


76. Page 38, Table 11.2.4.1 Noted and incorporated.
uncertainties in advantages for option 1.
Add: Higher oil recovery among all options in
77. Page 38, Table 11.2.4.1 Noted and incorporated.
advantages for option 1.

78. Page 38, Table 11.2.4.1 Delete disadvantages no. 7 of option 1. Noted and incorporated.

Add: Requires surveillance and maintenance at


79. Page 38, Table 11.2.4.1 Noted and incorporated.
elevated platforms in disadvantages for option 1.

80. Page 39, Table 11.2.4.1 Delete disadvantages no. 8 of option 2. Noted and incorporated.

Is cost estimation based on one train? If yes, please


81. Page 40, section 11.2.5 Noted and incorporated.
mention the basis.
Replace: Crude Export Cooler with Stabilized Crude
82. Page 41, Table 11.2.5.1 Noted and incorporated.
Cooler.

83. Page 41, Table 11.2.5.1 Rephrase: TEG based GDU Noted and incorporated.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

The stripper only option is removed from


the revised report as stripper
84. Page 41, Table 11.2.5.1 Include stripper only option as well. configuration comes with HC recovery
(DPCU) as requested by COMPANY
(see comment no. 26 above).

85. Page 41, Table 11.2.5.1 Rephrase: Stripper + HC Recovery Noted and incorporated.

As per Table 11.2.2.3, the total compressor load is 5


86. Page 41, Table 11.2.5.1 Noted and updated in the revised report.
MW. Please check and update accordingly.
The effect of the recovery is already
embedded in the incremental cost of the
87. Page 42, Table 11.2.5.2 Consider oil recovery factor for OPEX estimation.
main process equipment /components of
every option.

88. Page 42, Table 11.2.5.2 Include stripper only option as well. Refer response to item 84.

89. Page 42, Table 11.2.5.2 Rephrase: Stripper + HC Recovery Noted and incorporated.

As per Table 11.2.2.3, the total compressor load is 5


90. Page 42, Table 11.2.5.2 Noted and updated in the revised report.
MW. Please check and update accordingly.
Mention the reasons for Stabilizer option one by one
91. Page 43, section 11.2.5 Noted and incorporated.
instead of providing a paragraph.

92. Page 43, section 11.2.5 Make it bold. Noted and incorporated.

This is updated to Recovered gas from


93. Page 43, section 11.3 Delete: Recovered gas from Flare Gas (purge) Flare Gas Recovery Ejectors Package in
the revised report.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

94. Page 44, section 11.3 Pressure shall be 1110 psig. Please check. Noted and incorporated.

The observation is updated in the


95. Page 46, section 11.3.2 Discussion required with Consultant.
revised report.
Refer Compressor Selection Study Report (including
96. Page 48, section 11.3.2 Noted and incorporated.
Document Number).
Rephrase: The glycol removes saturated water from
97. Page 49, section 11.4.1 Noted and incorporated.
the hydrocarbon gas D
The write-up is referring to water is
Why only at bottom of column? It should be through removed at the bottom of the column.
98. Page 49, section 11.4.1
the column. Please clarify. This paragraph is updated in the revised
report.
Prior to entering Flash Vessel, rich glycol will pass
through Stripper to gain temperature by cooling the hot Noted, write-up is revised in the updated
99. Page 49, section 11.4.1
vapour leaving out of stripper in order to provide report.
adequate reflux.
COMPANY to note the wet gas entering
GDU Package is at the temperature of
Air cooler cannot be used. Wet gas temperature is
149 °F (65 °F) (from HP Gas
65°C, if the air cooler is used, then the lean TEG inlet
Compressor 2nd Stage Discharge KOD).
temperature shall <=65°, which is not favorable for
The TEG Contactor is designed for 10
Glycol Contactor.
100. Page 49, section 11.4.1 °F temperature approach (between inlet
Lean Glycol inlet temperature shall be higher than the
gas and lean TEG) to avoid
wet gas temperature)
condensation. Therefore, air cooler is
used to cool the lean TEG before
Consultant to clarify.
recirculate the TEG to the TEG
Contactor.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


Delete: The TEG Units are based on absorption
101. Page 50, section 11.4.1 Noted and incorporated.
process.
The difference between heating demand
and heat exchanger requirement are as
below:
- Heating demand refers to the
Heating demand and heat exchanger requirement.
102. Page 55, section 11.4.3.5 exchanger duty which using hot oil
Please clarify the difference between these two.
as heating medium in the package.
- Heat exchanger requirement refers
to the total heat exchanger duty
required in the package.

Section 11.5 is not required as it is already covered as


part of HC Recovery from Export gas. That process Noted, this section is renamed to HC
103. Page 60, section 11.5
itself is called as DPCU (though it was named as MEG Condensate handling at ASAB.
Injection Process)

This option is not preferred as it requires ADNOC Noted, this Option is ruled out (deleted)
104. Page 62, Figure 11.5.3.1
Onshore Approval to spike condensate into MOL line. as requested.

Noted, all proposed / evaluated options


Continuous flaring of 2.7 MMSCFD is not preferred are documented in this report. The
105. Page 63, section 11.5.3
w.r.t. minimum flaring philosophy. recommended option is updated in the
revised report.

106. Page 65, section 11.6.1 Refer to attached TQ-010. Noted and incorporated.

Consultant to obtain the Vendor Confirmation for


Noted, residence time is updated to 3
107. Page 66, section 11.6.3 residence time during FEED stage as recommended in
hours as agreed with COMPANY.
ISD / Design Review workshop.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


This will be carried out during detailed
Will CFD be carried out during FEED? Mention it
108. Page 66, section 11.6.3 engineering and updated in the revised
accordingly.
report.
Consultant to note that the wash water is sourced from
ADWEA pipeline which is located about 65 km from
Haliba CDS. Consultant to estimate the wash water
109. Page 69, section 11.7.1 arrival temperature for Summer & Winter based on the Noted and updated in the revised report.
hydraulics using Pipesim instead of assuming merely
summer & winter average temperature. Accordingly,
the arrival temperature to be updated.
Consultant to note that the resulted temperature gain
(i.e. 3.1°F) in the crude will have considerable impact
on all heat exchanges in the oil train (including reboiler Noted, this section is updated in the
110. Page 70, Table 11.7.1.1
duty). Therefore, consultant to produce reduction in revised report.
heat duty for other HEX, OPEX instead of assessing
only wash water heater as a stand-alone unit.

111. Page 70, section 11.7.1 Rephrase: Based on the above analysis D Noted and incorporated.

Considering the number of cases


analyzed, it is better not to show the
Please mention inlet and outlet temperature of each operating temperature in the schematic.
112. Page 71, Figure 11.7.2.1
HEX in the schematic for easy understanding. The inlet and outlet temperature of each
HEX are provided in the table. Please
refer to the table 11.7.2.1 for details.
Oil recovery (%) is provided in the
113. Page 71, Table 11.7.2.1 Provide oil recovery in BOPD in this Table.
revised report.
Include hot oil system duty also as the HEX analysis
114. Page 71, Table 11.7.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
has to be done as complete HEX network.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


Please provide temperature in/out of each Heat
115. Page 71, Table 11.7.2.1 Noted and incorporated.
Exchanger.
Agreed that Reboiler duty is increased from 3.3 MW to
5.7 MW. Reboiler is designed for 6.2 MW (Summer).
Consultant is concluding based on the reboiler duty
alone. Please note that hot oil requirement in wet Noted, this section is updated in the
116. Page 72, section 11.7.2 crude heater is NIL. This shall also be considered revised report. Refer to the revised
while analyzing the results. Hence, this study cannot report for details.
be concluded with stand-alone assessment.
Conclusion shall be arrived considering the integrated
network.
The intent of this analysis is not to recover complete
117. Page 72, section 11.7.2 heat in the wet crude heat exchanger itself. It is to Noted.
optimize the entire HEX Network.
Please check the figure. Seems incorrect for the basis
118. Page 72, section 11.7.2 Noted and updated.
given.

This statement is not valid as reboiler temperature is


119. Page 72, section 11.7.2 Noted and updated.
202°F in Summer Case.

Please add Feed / Bottom HEX in the schematic for


120. Page 73, Figure 11.7.3.1 Noted and incorporated.
completeness.
Desalter inlet temperature higher than 150°F is also
This section is updated in the revised
fine as long as there is no additional heating medium
121. Page 73, section 11.7.3 report. Refer to the revised report for
requirement. In fact, additional air cooler is also
details.
considered as "Heat Loss".
This section is updated in the revised
This can be higher than 155°F in order to limit the
122. Page 73, Table 11.7.3.1 report. Refer to the revised report for
Stabilized crude temperature within 149°F.
details.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2


HTRI result is included in the revised
123. Page 74, section 11.7.3 Please submit HTRI Analysis / Calculation.
report.
This case is considered as an upset
scenario earlier due to the Feed/Bottom
Is bypassing Feed / Bottom HEX an operational case? Heat Exchangers are with the
Company understand that reboiler, is designed configuration of two in series; however,
124. Page 74, section 11.7.3
considering Feed/Bottom HEX is online. Consultant to this section is updated as the
clarify exchangers are revised to two in
parallel. Please refer to the revised
report for details.

Is 202F possible during the complete bypass of Feed /


Bottom HEX?
This section is revised. Please refer to
125. Page 74, Table 11.7.3.2 Reboiler is designed considering Feed / Bottom HEX is
the revised report for details.
online. During bypass of Feed/Bottom HEX case, is it
possible to achieve 202°F?

For the Analysis of HEX Network, Consultant to note


that Study can be complete only when it is done for
both Summer & Winter case. Currently, Consultant has
carried out specific cases (i.e. Winter case for wet
126. Page 74, section 11.7.3 crude analysis & Summer for Stabilized crude cooler). Noted and updated in the revised report.
Assessment to be done for both cases and
recommendations shall be based on the two cases
(Summer & winter). Otherwise study will be
incomplete.
FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

DOCUMENT / DRAWING COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)


Projects Engineering Division

COMPANY Transmittal Reference: Date CONSULTANT Transmittal Reference: Date


ALDPOC-TRANSMIT-000885 14/04/2020 SNCL-TRANSMIT-001047 19/03/2020
Document / Drawing Title COMPANY Document / Drawing Number with Rev. No. Review code

Process Selection Report 60-01-11-2603, Rev B Code - 2

CONSULTANT Checked By Job Title Date Signature


Aristides Digitally signed by Aristides Valbuena
Aristides J. Valbuena Senior Technical Manager 24/10/2020 Valbuena
Date: 2020.10.24 17:06:51 +04'00'

CONSULTANT Approved By Job Title Date Signature

Sanjeev Dhiman Engineering Manager 24/10/2020 Sanjeev Digitally signed by


Sanjeev Dhiman

Dhiman Date: 2020.10.24


17:07:35 +04'00'
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 1 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

COMPANY DOCUMENT NO. 60-01-11-2617

Contract No: SUS-P&E-ITT-089/CT


Project No: 24001-10010
Document Class: 1

Rev. Date Status Status Description Originator Reviewed By Approved By


Aristides Digitally signed by
Aristides Valbuena Sanjeev Digitally signed by
Sanjeev Dhiman
Valbuena Date: 2020.10.24
17:07:08 +04'00' Dhiman
Date: 2020.10.24
17:07:22 +04'00'

00 24/10/2020 IFU Issued for Use SLL AJV SDN

B 17/03/2020 IFA Issued for Approval KAR / SLL AJV SDN

A 26/10/2019 IFR Issued for Review KAR / SLL AJV SDN


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 2 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

ISSUE RECORD / REVISION HISTORY

Rev Date Status Status Description Section Revised

A 26/10/2019 IFR Issued for Review


Document is updated per COMPANY’s
B 17/03/2020 IFA Issued for Approval
comments (refer to CRS).
Document is updated per COMPANY’s
00 24/10/2020 IFU Issued for Used
comments (refer to CRS).
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 3 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Haliba Phase II Central Degassing Station (CDS) is designed to produce 216 MBOPD
(technical rate) stabilized oil, 75 MMSCFD associated gas and 265 MBPWD of produced water
including wash water. The CDS is provided with three (3) identical trains of 72 MBOPD (technical
rate) capacity each distributed with flexibility to remove one train during EPC stage of the project.
The corresponding sustainable rate of stabilized oil is 60 MBOPD per train and 180 MBOPD for
total of three (3) trains.
The stabilized crude, export gas and disposal water are produced at the following specifications:

Parameter Specification

Stabilized Crude
Salt 18 PTB
Basic Sediment and
0.1% by volume
Water
H2S 50 ppmw
10 psia – Winter
Reid Vapor Pressure
6.2 psia – Summer

Export Gas

Water Content 7 lbs / MMSCF (Notes 1, 2)


Disposal Water
400 ppmv (Normal)
Dispersed Oil in Water
1,000 ppmv (Maximum Excursion)
The water shall be treated to ensure
that corrosion rate in the water
H2S
pipeline is within acceptable limit for
carbon steel material.
Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/l
Water Injection (Aquifer Water)

Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/l

Notes:
1. The gas shall be treated to ensure that corrosion rate in the export pipeline is within
acceptable limit for carbon steel material to avoid hydrate formation.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 4 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
2. Water, H2S and CO2 specification – to meet the material requirement and to meet ADNOC
Gas Processing / ADNOC Onshore ASAB CDS limits for the required quantity.

The well fluid from various reservoirs, Haliba Main body, Haliba North, Haliba South, Al Humrah,
Bu Tasah, Bu Nikhelah and Bu Qalla are blended and received at Haliba CDS via trunkline and
flowlines.
The Central Degassing Station comprises the following main process systems:

Crude Oil Degassing, Dehydration, Desalting and Stabilization System


The wet crude is collected at CDS at production manifold operating at 250 psig and 111 °F
(summer) and 73 °F (winter). The production lines routed to the three (3) production manifolds
which is dedicated for each oil processing train intends to maintain equal distribution of flow to all
three oil processing trains. The wet crude is first transferred to 1st Stage Separator operating at
220 psig for separation of crude oil, gas and water. The separated oil with 5% v/v water content is
routed to Crude Inlet Heater. The formation water containing maximum 1,000 ppmv oil is routed to
Produced Water Skim Tank. The separated gas is routed to HP 1st Stage Compression.

The Crude Inlet Heater heats the wet crude with stabilized crude from crude stabilization process,
ensuring energy conservation. The wet crude is then transferred to 2nd Stage Separator operating
at 50 psig for further separation of crude oil, gas and water. The separated oil with 5% v/v water
content is routed to Wet Crude Heaters using 1st Stage Desalter Feed Pumps. The formation
water containing 1,000 ppmv oil is routed to Produced Water Skim Tank. The separated gas from
2nd Stage Separator is routed to LP 2nd Stage Compression.

The Wet Crude Heater heats the wet crude to 150 °F for Dehydration and Desalting processes, to
facilitate breaking of emulsions and enhance the oil and water separation. From this heater, wet
crude flows to 1st Stage Desalter for further separation of water from crude oil. The 1st Stage
Desalter is an electrostatic treater that operates at 140 psig full of liquid, intended to remove the
water to 0.1 % v/v of the crude outlet stream, whilst the water outlet stream is 1,000 ppmv of oil in
water. From the 1st Stage Desalter, the crude oil is transferred to 2nd Stage Desalter. The 2nd
Stage Desalter is an electrostatic treater operates at 110 psig full of liquid, intended to remove salt
content of the crude upto 18 ptb. Wash water is provided to 1st / 2nd Stage Desalter at 5% v/v of
dry crude rate. The water removed from the 2nd Stage Desalter is routed to the inlet of 1st Stage
Desalter via 2nd Stage Desalter Recycle Wash Water Pumps.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 5 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
The desalted crude from 2nd Stage Desalter is routed to crude stabilization process, consisting of
Stabilizer Feed / Bottom Heat Exchangers, Stabilizer Column, Stabilizer Reboilers and Crude
Transfer Pumps. The feed crude to Stabilizer (70% by volume) is pre-heat to 170 °F (Summer) /
155 °F (Winter) via Stabilizer Feed / Bottom Heat Exchangers to optimize Stabilizer Reboilers
duty. The operating pressure at the top of the column is 20 psig. The Stabilizer Column is
operates at 20 – 23 psig from top to bottom of column. The stabilized crude at required
specifications is routed to Crude Inlet Heater for heat recovery and then cooled at Stabilized
Crude Cooler to 149 °F. The stabilized crude is stored at Flow Suction Tanks and transferred to
ASAB via Main Oil Line Booster Pumps, Main Oil Line Pumps and pipeline.

Gas Compression and Conditioning


The gases from 2nd Stage Separator, Crude Stabilization Unit and Recovered gas from Flare Gas
Recovery Ejectors Package are routed to Low Pressure Compression System. The Low Pressure
Compression is provided with three (3) stage compressors along with associated suction and
discharge Knockout drums and After coolers. The gas from Low Pressure Compression System
along with the gas from 1st Stage Separator is routed to High Pressure Compression System. The
High Pressure Compression is provided with two (2) compressors along with associated suction
and discharge Knockout drums and After coolers. The condensate separated from gas cooling is
routed back to process.

The High Pressure gas is then routed to the TEG Dehydration Units, the lean glycol removes the
water from the gas by physical absorption in the Contactor at 1066 psig. The dry hydrocarbon gas
leaves the top of the absorption column and is sent to ASAB at 1043 psig via pipeline.

Produced Water Plant


The produced water collected from 1st Stage Separator, 2nd Stage Separator, and 1st Stage
Desalter of every oil train are transferred to the Produced Water Skim (Settling) Tanks to achieve
the required dispersed oil specification. The oil removed in the Produced Water Skim Tanks is
routed to the Skimmed Oil Vessel and recycled back to the CDS for processing.

The treated water from the Produced Water Skim Tanks shall be transferred to the Water
Disposal Wells using the Produced Water Disposal Pumps.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 6 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Utilities
The above processing facilities are supported by number of utilities and infrastructure: Plant /
Instrument Air, Fuel Gas System, Hot Oil System, N2 Generation and Supply, Potable Water,
Utility Water, Wash Water, Firewater Protection Systems, Storm Water Handling System,
Evaporation Pond, Drainage Systems, Emergency Power Generation, Flare, Relief and Blowdown
Systems, Chemical Systems.
The overall process scheme for Central Degassing Station Configuration is presented overleaf.

Pilot Wells
The Produced Water Re-injection and Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection are provided to
conduct Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) field pilot tests.

For Produced Water Re-injection Pilot Test, slipstream of produced water (maximum 50 MBWPD,
25 MBWPD for each pilot PWRI well) taken downstream of Produced Water Disposal Pumps will
be routed to the Produced Water Re-injection Pumps to meet the pressure of 2000 psig (138
barg) at produced water re-injection pilot wells.

For Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Pilot Test, slipstream of the gas (maximum 10
MMSCFD, 5 MMSCFD for each WAG well) taken from the common dehydrated gas header
coming from the TEG Units to gas export pipeline is routed to the Gas Injection Compressor
Package for Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Pilot Wells. The Gas Injection Compressor
Package consists of three (3) stages of compression along with associated suction and discharge
Knockout drums and After coolers The discharge pressure of the Gas Injection Compression
Package is set at 4200 psig to meet the required pressure at Water Alternating Gas Injection Pilot
Wells tie-in pressure of 4000 psig (276 barg).
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT


Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 7 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

HALIBA PHASE II - CENTRAL DEGASSING STATION


ASAB
Launcher Receiver
Gas Pipeline Export Gas to
Existing HP Gas
Transfer Line at
PCV AGP LP Booster
Inline Filter Gas Station
Recover ed Gas TEG
LP Gas HP Gas Separator

PCV
from Flare Gas
Recover y based Slug
Crude from Ejectors
Compress. Compress. GDU Catcher
Stabilizer Package
st
1 Sta ge from Feed/ Conde nsate
LCV
HC Condensate

PCV
Separator Bottom HEX Recycle back to Process Gas Injection Water to Existing
Train 1 Alternating
Dedicated Compressor Crude Heater
Production 72,000 Gas (WAG)
Package LCV Inlet Manifold at
Manifold bopd Injection
(Pilot) ASAB CDS
LCV

nd Pilot Wells
2 Sta ge
Separator Shallow Water
LCV from Water
1st Stage Supply Wells
Crude Inlet
Heater Desalter PCV
Feed Pumps
Train 2

LCV
Dedicated
Production 72,000
Manifold bopd
To Crude
LCV

Inlet
Heater Stabilizer
1st Stage 2nd Stage Column
Desalter Desalter
Wet Crude
Train 3 Heater Sta bilizer
Dedicated Feed /
Production (Optional/Future)

PDC
Bot tom Heat
Manifold Stabilized
72,000 PDC Exc hangers
Crude TC

LCV
bopd Cooler Crude
HO
Transfer
Pumps
LCV
Stabilizer
Reboiler
Potable Water Potable 2nd Stage
from ADWEA Water Desalter Recycle
Pipeline System Wash Water
Pumps
Produced Water
Header to PW Skim
Tanks
Hot Oil System N2 Flare
Utilities
Expansion
Min Vessel
Flow
Plant / N2 Generation/ Fuel Gas Potable Water Truck
Instrument Air Supply System Loading
System from ADWEA HO
System Heaters
TC
HO
FG
Trim
Potable Water / Fire water N2 Flare
Storm Water Chemical Cooler
Utility Water Protection ASAB
System Systems Stabilized Crude FG
System Systems From Trains 2 /3 Launcher Rec eiver
Crude MOL

Drainage Flow
Evaporation Wash Water Metering
STP Systems (O/C/ Suction
Pond System Tanks
Unit
Sanitary) Rundown Line
FG
Flare
To 2nd MOL
ASAB MOL
Produced Water N2 Pumps
Flare Gas Stage MOL Pumps
Emergency from PW Header Separator
Hot Oil Recovery Booster Oil Export
Flare Systems Power Recovered Oil
System Ejectors Pumps to BAB
Generation back to 2nd
Package Dewatering MP21
Stage Separator PW
PW Disposal Pumps
FG Flare Skim Pumps PW
N2 Tanks Disposal Metering
Commingling Manifold
LCV Unit
Gra de Wells MPS
Skimmed
Ruwais Refinery
Oil Vessel MP21 Jebel Dhana (MOL 3 & 4)

PW
FCV Reinjection
Pilot Wells Metering
Unit
Commingling Manifold
PW MPS
Ruwais Refinery
Re-injection
Jebel Dhana (MOL 3 & 4)
Pumps
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 8 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 10


1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 10
1.2 Project Objectives.................................................................................................................... 11
1.3 DEFINE (FEED) Stage Objectives .......................................................................................... 11
2.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................... 12
3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................... 12
3.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.2 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 14
4.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 15
4.1 COMPANY Reference Documents ......................................................................................... 15
5.0 SIMULATION SET UP ............................................................................................................ 15
6.0 STUDY BASIS ......................................................................................................................... 15
6.1 Production Manifold Operating Conditions ............................................................................. 15
6.2 Production Forecast ................................................................................................................ 16
6.3 Reservoir Flowrates ................................................................................................................ 20
6.4 Reservoir Composition ............................................................................................................ 21
6.5 Crude Blending and Conditioning ........................................................................................... 26
6.6 Product Specifications ............................................................................................................. 27
7.0 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 28
7.1 Climatic Conditions .................................................................................................................. 28
8.0 PLANT CAPACITY .................................................................................................................. 29
9.0 PLANT TURNDOWN .............................................................................................................. 29
10.0 DESIGN LIFE .......................................................................................................................... 29
11.0 CDS CONFIGURATION ANALYSIS....................................................................................... 30
11.1 Wet Crude Handling System ................................................................................................... 30
11.1.1 Production Manifold ............................................................................................................. 30
11.1.2 1st Stage Separator.............................................................................................................. 30
11.1.3 Crude Inlet Heater ............................................................................................................... 30
11.1.4 2nd Stage Separator ............................................................................................................. 31
11.1.5 1st Stage Desalter Feed Pumps .......................................................................................... 31
11.1.6 Wet Crude Heaters .............................................................................................................. 31
11.1.7 1st Stage Desalter ................................................................................................................ 32
11.1.8 2nd Stage Desalter ............................................................................................................... 32
11.1.9 2nd Stage Desalter Recycle Wash Water Pumps ............................................................... 32
11.2 Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration Analysis ..................................................................... 32
11.2.1 Option 1 - Use of a Stabilizer with Compressor System (LP/HP) and TEG based GDU .. 33
11.2.2 Option 2 - Use of a Stripper with Compressor System (LP/HP) and DPCU (HC Recovery)35
11.2.3 Option 3 - Use of an additional Separation Stage with heating and Compressor System
(LP/HP) with TEG based GDU ............................................................................................................ 38
11.2.4 Comparison of Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration ....................................................... 39
11.2.5 Cost Estimation of Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration ................................................. 41
11.3 Gas Compression System Configuration ................................................................................ 45
11.3.1 Compression Trains Capacity Rationale ............................................................................ 45
11.3.2 Compressors Discharge Temperature Limitations ............................................................. 45
11.4 Gas Dehydration...................................................................................................................... 49
11.4.1 Gas Dehydration by Tri-Ethylene Glycol (TEG) Absorption Process ................................. 50
11.4.2 Gas Dehydration by Mono-Ethylene Glycol Injection Process ........................................... 52
11.4.3 Analysis of Gas Dehydration Unit (TEG Dehydration Unit) Location ................................. 54
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 9 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.5 HC Condensate handling at ASAB ......................................................................................... 55
11.5.1 Expected HC Condensate at ASAB .................................................................................... 55
11.5.2 HC Condensate handling at ASAB ..................................................................................... 56
11.6 Water Management ................................................................................................................. 58
11.6.1 Produced Water Treatment Plant Capacity ........................................................................ 59
11.6.2 Disposal Water Specification .............................................................................................. 59
11.6.3 Produced Water Treatment Technology Approach ............................................................ 60
11.7 Heat Exchangers Analysis ...................................................................................................... 64
11.7.1 Analysis of an additional Wash Water Heat Exchanger ..................................................... 64
11.7.2 Requirement of Hot Oil in Wet Crude Heater ..................................................................... 68
11.7.3 Removal of Stabilized Crude Cooler ................................................................................... 71
11.7.4 Flow Distribution to Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger ............................................ 77
11.8 Pilot Wells ................................................................................................................................ 82
11.8.1 Produced Water Re-injection (PWRI) Pilot Test Scheme .................................................. 82
11.8.2 Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Pilot Test Scheme ............................................... 82
12.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 85
12.1 Crude Stabilization .................................................................................................................. 85
12.2 Gas Compression System....................................................................................................... 86
12.3 Analysis of Gas Dehydration Unit (TEG Dehydration Unit) Location ..................................... 86
12.4 HC Condensate Handling at ASAB......................................................................................... 86
12.5 Water Management ................................................................................................................. 86
12.6 Heat Exchangers Analysis ...................................................................................................... 86
12.7 Gas Injection Compression ..................................................................................................... 88
13.0 HOLD LIST .............................................................................................................................. 88
14.0 ATTACHMENTS...................................................................................................................... 88
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 10 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
Al Dhafra Petroleum’s Concession Area-1, spanning 4,340 km2, is located onshore in the
South-East region of Abu Dhabi and currently includes four discovered fields Haliba, Bu
Qalla, Al Humrah, Bu Tasa, Bu Nikhelah and LG-1 (Figure 1.1.1) which were discovered
and tested in the early 1990s. The Haliba field is located to the east of Abu Dhabi, near
the border with Oman. It was discovered in 1991 and started development in 2015. The
field is operated by Al Dhafra Petroleum, a joint venture between ADNOC, KNOC and GS
Energy.
Facilities for production from the Haliba Main Body reservoirs are in the EXECUTE stage
as part of the Haliba Field Development Project (Phase I). First oil is achieved on 01st June
2019 and ramp upto 40,000 BOPD. These facilities comprise of oil wells, water supply
wells, gathering flow lines network and Central Gathering Facility (CGF). The CGF
accommodates multi-phase pumps, water injection facilities, utility systems, control room
and electrical infrastructure. The multiphase fluid is exported to ADNOC Onshore ASAB
CDS for further processing via 16’’, 65 km pipeline, tied to the inlet of the 1st stage of inlet
manifold.
Figure 1.1.1 – Haliba Field

COMPANY proposed to explore the potential to increase or extend production of Haliba


field by exploiting the identified potential prospects near the Haliba Main Body. The
selection recommendation of the facilities required for these future potential and nearby
prospects is based on phased approach to suit the subsurface development plans and
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 11 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
enhance the economic return on investment. Where appropriate, existing surface facilities
that are currently under execution will be utilized as part of the Haliba Field Development
Project.
SNC Lavalin International Inc has been awarded a contract to carry out FEED Phase
design to identify and design the facilities required for stabilization at Haliba and to handle
the long-term production from the identified and future potential fields.

1.2 Project Objectives


The project objectives as following:
• To carry out FEED design of surface facilities for stabilization of crude oil at Haliba
to handle the long-term production from Haliba Main Body and identified and future
potential fields in a most optimized manner, which shall cater the long-term
business requirements of COMPANY, as well as meets the Design, Operations
requirements in accordance with latest Codes, Standards, & Industry Practices and
ADNOC Value Assurance Practices (VAP).
• Comply with SPC Fiscal Metering requirement (including meter prover loop) to
eliminate 10% deduction from meter reading by stabilising production at Haliba
Field.

1.3 DEFINE (FEED) Stage Objectives


The DEFINE (FEED) objectives includes the following:

i. Verify the Conceptual Design and complete remaining optimisation studies to ensure
PROJECT design is techno-commercially efficient to meet COMPANY’s business
objectives.
ii. Carry out FEED Design to develop the facilities in phased approach to suit the
subsurface development plans and reservoir data, whilst utilizing the surface
facilities.
iii. Perform further engineering to provide sufficient definition for COMPANY to issue an
EPC RFT Package to EPC Contractors for quotation, which shall include the
following:
iv. Develop surface facilities required for processing production from Haliba Main Body
and its North / South Extension areas.
v. Design facilities to cater for handling production from other near Haliba production
potential (Prospects Al Humrah, Bu Tasah, Bu Nikhelah and Bu Qalla)
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 12 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
vi. Provision of cost estimate at an accuracy of ±15% to support COMPANY in Final
Investment Decision for the PROJECT.
vii. Identification of Long Lead Items and preparation of LLI Material Requisitions to
enable COMPANY to place all necessary orders.

2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to present the analysis and selected process scheme of the
Central Degassing Station (CDS) to meet the intent of Haliba Phase II Project.
The following studies / analysis are performed:
• Crude Stabilization Configuration Analysis
• Gas Compression Configuration Analysis
• Gas Dehydration Process Study
• HC Condensate Handling at ASAB
• Produced Water Treatment Technology Selection
• Heat Exchangers Analysis
• Gas Injection Compression Configuration Analysis

3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS


3.1 Definitions

Term Definition

COMPANY Al Dhafra Petroleum Operations Co. Ltd. (Al Dhafra)

CONTRACT Where referenced shall mean COMPANY’s written and


executed Contract with CONSULTANT

CONCEPTUAL Advisian (Worley) was appointed by COMPANY to perform the


DESIGN Conceptual Design Study (ASSESS & SELECT Stage Study)
CONSULTANT
(ASEESS & SELECT)

CONSULTANT SNC Lavalin International Inc. was appointed by COMPANY


who shall perform FEED Study (under DEFINE Phase) as
described in this Contract and shall be responsible to provide
FEED Dossiers including the EPC Packages consisting of all
project deliverables sufficient to tender and award lump sum
EPC Contract for EXECUTE Phase of the PROJECT.

DEFINE Refine selected concept through basic engineering and


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 13 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Term Definition
prepare project plans to ensure successful execution

EFFECTIVE DATE Means the date on which the CONTRACT comes into effect

EPC CONTRACTOR To be appointed by COMPANY who shall perform Engineering,


Procurement and Construction stage (under EXECUTE Phase)

PHASE I Larsen &Toubro Hydrocarbon Engineering (LTHE) was


CONTRACTOR appointed by COMPANY who shall perform Engineering,
Procurement and Construction of Haliba Phase I Field
Development

EXECUTE Execute the project to achieve a fully operating system


according to detailed engineering, meeting Cost, Time, HSE
and Quality targets

Integrated Project COMPANY authorized party (Project Management Team)


Management Team responsible for the overall day-to-day execution of Project
(IPMT)

LICENSOR Used interchangeably with the term ‘Sub-Contractor’ and refers


to Work elements surrounding proprietary process technology
that constitutes licensed technology

PROJECT Area 1 Development Haliba Phase II

The Scope of Work to be completed during the FEED stage of


SERVICE
the Project

Shall The use of word “shall” indicates a mandatory requirement

Should The use of word “should” indicates a strong recommendation to


comply with the requirements of this document.

SITE Haliba Facilities, incorporating Phase I CGF, Phase II CDS,


GFs and Pipeline Facilities

Sub-Contractor The person, group or organization who may be employed by


CONSULTANT (or Sub-Contractor in reference to a supply
chain) to provide SERVICE of the PROJECT

Vendor / Supplier The person, group or organization who may be employed by


CONSULTANT (or Sub-Contractor in reference to a supply
chain) to provide services for the design, manufacture, testing
and packing / shipping of the equipment, or to provide
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 14 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Term Definition
materials, sub-components and sub-assemblies for
incorporation in the specified equipment.

3.2 Abbreviations
Abbreviations /
Descriptions
Acronyms
ADNOC Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

ADP Al Dhafra Petroleum Operations Company


ADNOC Onshore Abu Dhabi Onshore Operations Company

ADNOC Gas Processing Abu Dhabi Gas Processing Company


API American Petroleum Institute

CAPEX Capital Expenses

CDS Central Degassing Station


CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics

CGF Central Gathering Facility

DPCU Dew Point Control Unit

EOR Enhanced Oil Recovery


EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction

FEED Front End Engineering and Design

GDU Gas Dehydration Unit

HC Hydrocarbon Condensate

HP High Pressure
HPS High Pressure Separator

JT Joule Thomson

KO Knock Out

LCC Life Cycle Cost

LP Low Pressure
LPS Low Pressure Separator

MEG Mono-Ethylene Glycol


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 15 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Abbreviations /
Descriptions
Acronyms
MOL Main Oil Line

MPS Medium Pressure Separator


PTB Pounds per Thousand Barrels

RVP Reid Vapor Pressure

TEG Tri-Ethylene Glycol


TVP True Vapor Pressure

VRU Vapor Recovery Unit

4.0 REFERENCES
4.1 COMPANY Reference Documents

Document Title Document Number


1 CONTRACT SUS-P&E-ITT-089/CT
2 Scope of SERVICE for FEED Phase 1-01-99-93-1615, Rev D
TEC-T-PE-FLN-00067,
3 FEED Basis of Design for Surface Facilities – Phase II
Rev 00

5.0 SIMULATION SET UP


• Simulation software: HYSYS V9.0 and Promax V4.0.
• Thermodynamic Packages: Peng Robinson.
The Peng-Robinson (PR) model is ideal for Vapor Liquid Equilibrium (VLE) calculations
as well as calculating liquid densities for hydrocarbon systems.
The PR property package rigorously solves any single-, two-, or three-phase system with
a high degree of efficiency and reliability and is applicable over a wide range of
conditions:
- Temperature Range > - 271 °C or - 456 °F
- Pressure Range < 100,000 kPa or 15,000 psia

6.0 STUDY BASIS


The basis of the study is based on Basis of Design, Doc. No. TEC-T-PE-FLN-00067, Rev.
00, dated 12-Sep-19 and Haliba Phase II Wells list provided by COMPANY.

6.1 Production Manifold Operating Conditions


The operating conditions of production manifold is provided in Table 6.1.1.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 16 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Table 6.1.1 – Production Manifold Operating Conditions

Parameter Summer Winter


Temperature 111 °F (44 °C) 73 °F (23 °C)
Pressure 250 psig

6.2 Production Forecast


The Table 6.2.1 presents the production forecast for 80 MBOPD Case.

Table 6.2.1 – Production Forecast (Sustainable Rates)


Produced Water Water
Oil Liquid Gas GOR
Year Water Cut Injection
STBOPD BWPD STBLPD MMSCFD SCF/BBL % BWPD
2019 20,239 1,031 21,270 6.7 332 4.85% 25,963

2020 38,536 4,662 43,197 12.6 328 10.79% 48,516

2021 40,000 9,349 49,349 13.1 329 18.94% 56,435

2022 40,000 18,944 58,944 12.9 323 32.14% 61,855

2023 45,070 27,645 72,715 14.1 313.0 38.02% 72,085

2024 77,425 41,703 119,127 26.9 348.0 35.01% 112,492

2025 75,194 57,390 132,584 26.6 354.0 43.29% 118,823

2026 64,496 66,936 131,432 23.3 362.0 50.93% 124,772

2027 49,449 76,128 125,577 17.5 354.0 60.62% 120,016

2028 39,596 80,639 120,235 13.7 347.0 67.07% 114,206

2029 33,499 77,324 110,823 11.7 348.0 69.77% 109,555

2030 28,691 76,754 105,445 10.0 347.0 72.79% 106,861

2031 24,177 77,583 101,760 8.4 346.0 76.24% 102,373

2032 20,714 72,545 93,259 7.1 344.0 77.79% 93,725

2033 18,274 73,971 92,245 6.3 344.0 80.19% 92,443

2034 15,876 74,621 90,497 5.4 343.0 82.46% 87,738

2035 13,604 69,103 82,707 4.7 342.0 83.55% 82,220

2036 11,981 59,667 71,648 4.1 342.0 83.28% 72,898


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 17 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Produced Water Water


Oil Liquid Gas GOR
Year Water Cut Injection
STBOPD BWPD STBLPD MMSCFD SCF/BBL % BWPD
2037 10,638 57,405 68,043 3.6 342.0 84.37% 69,029

2038 9,190 53,930 63,120 3.2 345.0 85.44% 63,803

2039 7,677 44,057 51,734 2.6 337.0 85.16% 52,049

2040 6,473 39,229 45,702 2.2 337.0 85.84% 45,768

2041 6,045 37,214 43,259 2.0 336.0 86.03% 43,251

2042 5,310 34,028 39,338 1.8 335.0 86.50% 39,196

2043 4,726 29,764 34,490 1.6 334.0 86.30% 34,249

2044 3,968 25,495 29,463 1.3 333.0 86.53% 28,716

2045 2,437 14,185 16,622 0.8 331.0 85.34% 15,736

2046 2,122 12,975 15,097 0.7 331.0 85.94% 14,182

2047 2,019 13,030 15,049 0.7 331.0 86.58% 14,122

The above table indicates the maximum flowrate from all prospects is 77,425 MBOPD
(Y2024), 26.9 MMSCFD (Y2024) gas and 80,639 MBWPD (Y2028).

The above profile is corresponding to the 80 MBOPD oil production (sustainable). For 120
MBOPD and 180 MBOPD, the production provided in Table 6.2.1 is pro-rated and the same
is provided as part of Attachment 1.

The Export Gas and Produced Water maximum flowrate is estimated based on the
approach provided by COMPANY in TQ No. 60-99-11-0510. For details, refer to Attachment
2. Below section presents the basis and estimated maximum export gas and produced
water flowrate.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 18 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

For export gas:

a) Maximum Oil and Gas Case (Year 2024)

Table 6.2.2 – Estimated Export Gas Flowrate for Year 2024

Max. Export
Production Max. Oil Flowrate
Gas Flowrate Remarks
Forecast Case (BOPD) (Year 2024)
(MMSCFD)
80 MBOPD 77,425 26.9

120 MBOPD 120,000 41.7 Pro-rated

144 MBOPD 144,000 50 Pro-rated

180 MBOPD 180,000 62.5 Pro-rated

216 MBOPD 216,000 75 Pro-rated

Max Export Gas = (216,000 / 77,425) x 26.9 = 75 MMSCFD

b) Maximum Water Case (Year 2028)

Table 6.2.3: Estimated Export Gas Flowrate for Year 2028 (Note 1)
Export Gas
Production Oil Flowrate
Flowrate Remarks
Forecast Case (BOPD) (Year 2028)
(MMSCFD)

180 MBOPD 92,053 31.9

216 MBOPD 110,464 38.3 Pro-rated

Notes:
1. The export gas flowrate for maximum water case is per production profile, refer to
Attachment 1 for details.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 19 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
For produced water:

a) Maximum Oil and Gas Case (Year 2024)

Table 6.2.4 – Estimated Produced Water Flowrate for Year 2024 (Note 1)

Required
Max. Oil
Produced Wash Total Produced
Flowrate
Production Water Water Water to PW
(BOPD) Remarks
Profile Case Flowrate (Desalting Treatment Plant
(Year
(BWPD) Process) (BWPD)
2024)
(BWPD)

180 MBOPD 180,000 96,951 9,000 105,951

216 MBOPD 216,000 116,341 10,800 127,141 Pro-rated

Notes:
1. The produced water flowrate for maximum oil and gas case is per production profile,
refer to Attachment 1 for details.

b) Maximum Water Case (Year 2028)

Table 6.2.5: Estimated Produced Water Flowrate for Year 2028

Total
Max. Required
Oil Flowrate Max. Produced
Liquid Wash
Production corresponding Produced Water to
Flowrate Water
Profile to Max. Water Water PW Remarks
(BLPD) (Desalting
Case Flowrate Flowrate Treatment
(Year Process)
(BOPD) (BWPD) Plant
2025) (BWPD)
(BWPD)

180 MBOPD 308,236 92,053 216,183 4,603 220,786

216 MBOPD 369,883 110,464 259,420 5,523 264,943 Pro-rated

Max Produced Water = Max Liquid – Oil Rate corresponding to Max Water Case
= 308,236 – 92,053
= 216,183 BWPD (sustainable PW rate for 80 MBOPD Case)

Refer to Attachment 1 for Yearly Production Profile (Sustainable Rate) for 60 / 80 / 120 /
180 MBOPD.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 20 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
6.3 Reservoir Flowrates
The maximum flowrate from each reservoir used for the simulation is provided in Table
6.3.1. Refer to Attachment 3 for Reservoir Wise Production Profile. For crude blending, the
maximum flowrate from each reservoir is considered for simulation.

Table 6.3.1 – Reservoir Flowrate

Total Oil
Field Reservoir Flowrate Remarks
(STBOPD)

TZA 19,436

Main Haliba TZB 17,032

TZF 31,970

TZA 1,795
Haliba North
TZF 916

TZA 12,749
Haliba South
TZF 3,124

TZF 3,000
Assumed composition same
Al Humrah TZG 500
as TZF
Assumed composition same
U. Habshan 500
as TZF
TZA 499

TZB 1,589

TZC 993

TZD 1,464

Bu Tasah TZF 3,401

TZG 551

Unit 6 791

Assumed composition same


Unit 7 1,220
as U6

Unit 8 1,143
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 21 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Total Oil
Field Reservoir Flowrate Remarks
(STBOPD)
Assumed composition same
TZE 1,174
as TZF

Bu Nikhelah TZF 2,545

Assumed composition same


Habshan 2,041
as TZF.

Bu Qalla TZF 2,502

6.4 Reservoir Composition


The reservoir composition used for crude blending is provided in Table 6.4.1 and Table
6.4.2.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT


Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 22 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 6.4.1 – Reservoir Composition (Dry Basis)
Haliba (Main Body, Bu Qalla
Al Humrah Bu Nikhelah
Field North & South) Bu Tasah (Mole%) (QL)
(Mole%) (Mole%)
(Mole%) (Mole%)
TZF/ TZE/
Reservoir / U6/
TZA(3) TZB TZF(3) TZG/ TZA TZB TZC U8 TZD TZF TZG TZA(2) TZF/ TZF
Component U7
U.Habshan Habshan
N2 0.25 0.233 0.37 0.34 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.22 0.33 0.32 0.25 0.37 0.37

CO2 0.97 1.47 1.46 1.81 1.3 1.73 1.85 1.86 1.73 1.58 1.72 1.68 0.97 1.46 1.46

H2S(6) 0 0 0 0.0001 0.00025 0.0003 0.00025 0.00025 0 0.00025 0.001 0.0004 0 0 0

C1 16.28 17.47 17.54 28.18 19.74 20.91 20.3 19.9 18.61 19.01 23.7 24.74 16.28 17.54 17.54

C2 4.98 5.31 4.9 8.01 6.82 7.82 7.36 6.89 6.48 6.58 8.6 8.38 4.98 4.9 4.9

C3 5.28 5.3 5.49 6.86 5.91 8.04 7.43 6.56 6.4 6.67 7.78 7.24 5.28 5.49 5.49

iC4 1.57 1.46 1.75 1.73 1.52 2.15 1.89 1.6 1.61 1.76 1.87 1.96 1.57 1.75 1.75

nC4 3.36 3.04 3.92 3.79 3.3 4.37 3.82 3.3 3.31 3.63 3.98 4.06 3.36 3.92 3.92

iC5 2.04 1.81 2.33 1.9 1.81 2.07 2.17 2 2.1 2.28 2.1 2.06 2.04 2.33 2.33

nC5 2.27 2.02 2.8 2.2 1.84 1.86 2.15 2.08 2.15 2.24 2.29 2.34 2.27 2.8 2.8

C6 3.81 3.54 4.6 3.55 2.73 3.02 3.5 3.6 3.65 3.59 3.8 3.69 3.81 4.6 4.6

Mcyclopentane 1.04 0 0.6 0.57 1.18 1.27 1.3 1.02 1.08 1.18 0.58 0.59 1.04 0.6 0.6

Benzene 0.45 0 0.46 0.7 0.43 0.46 0.43 0.5 0.62 0.67 0.8 0.68 0.45 0.46 0.46

Cyclohexane 0.59 0 0.68 0.63 0.48 0.59 0.69 0.65 0.77 0.95 0.76 0.75 0.59 0.68 0.68

C7 3.46 5.19 3.91 2.9 2.55 2.81 2.87 2.95 2.95 2.88 3.12 3 3.46 3.91 3.91

Mcyclohexane 1.03 0 1 0.76 0.89 1.09 1.09 0.95 1.1 1.26 0.87 0.85 1.03 1 1

Toluene 0.76 0 1.09 1.19 0.76 1.09 1.03 0.98 1.05 1.15 1.52 1.46 0.76 1.09 1.09

C8 3.82 5.49 4.01 2.98 2.89 2.89 2.97 3.12 3.19 3.11 3.14 3 3.82 4.01 4.01

E-Benzene 0.37 0 0.33 0.26 0.3 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.38 0.4 0.3 0.27 0.37 0.33 0.33

m-Xylene 0.315 0 0.505 0.37 0.28 0.35 0.33 0.325 0.33 0.38 0.44 0.49 0.315 0.505 0.505
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT


Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 23 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Haliba (Main Body, Bu Qalla


Al Humrah Bu Nikhelah
Field North & South) Bu Tasah (Mole%) (QL)
(Mole%) (Mole%)
(Mole%) (Mole%)
TZF/ TZE/
Reservoir / U6/
TZA(3) TZB TZF(3) TZG/ TZA TZB TZC U8 TZD TZF TZG TZA(2) TZF/ TZF
Component U7
U.Habshan Habshan
p-Xylene 0.315 0 0.505 0.37 0.28 0.35 0.33 0.325 0.33 0.38 0.44 0.49 0.315 0.505 0.505

o-Xylene 0.26 0 0.44 0.36 0.23 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.41 0.41 0.26 0.44 0.44

C9 3.21 4.71 3.44 2.51 2.51 2.29 2.46 2.64 2.73 2.66 2.62 2.52 3.21 3.44 3.44

C10+ 8.16 8.28 8.64 6.33 6.54 6.04 6.76 7.04 7.33 7.3 6.62 6.35 8.16 8.64 8.64

C12+ 18.82 18.73 17.79 12.91 16.72 14.43 15.17 16.14 16.81 16.36 13.44 13.09 18.82 17.79 17.79

C20+ 9.64 9.3 7.87 5.86 9.67 7.6 7.71 8.39 8.52 8.04 5.93 6.27 9.64 7.87 7.87

C30+ 3.07 2.82 1.98 1.66 3.61 2.49 2.46 2.85 2.81 2.64 1.57 1.83 3.07 1.98 1.98

C36+ 3.88 3.82 1.59 1.27 5.48 3.37 3.06 3.47 3.44 2.76 1.27 1.48 3.88 1.59 1.59

Notes:
1. As per PVT report, the reservoir composition has the pure component up to C35.However, for ease of simulation, components from C10
onwards are lumped as follows:
• C10+, C12+, C20+, C30+, C36+.
• Benzene, E-Benzene, Toluene and Xylene shall be modelled as pure component in order to include these components in the design.
2. The TZA composition of Al Humrah, Bu Nikhelah and Bu Qalla are assumed based on Haliba data.
3. The composition of TZA and TZF of Haliba Main Body reservoirs is as per the latest well fluid analysis and there is minor difference with
Phase I EPC Facility design.
4. Deleted.
5. Deleted.
6. Maximum H2S content in the well fluid is expected to be 60 ppmv (gas phase) at wellhead condition based on phase I data. However, for the
purpose of the surface facility material selection, a value of 500 ppmv in well fluid (gas phase) at wellhead condition will be considered to
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT


Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 24 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
allow for potential souring of the reservoir. All material shall be NACE certified. For all other design purposes (safety studies and process
simulations), H2S content of 60 ppmv in well fluid (gas phase) will be considered.
7. Solid content in well fluid: maximum 550 ppm mostly fine particles (less than 1 micron).
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT


Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 25 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 6.4.2 – N+ Component Properties
Molecular Density Molecular Density
Component Component
weight (g/cc) weight (g/cc)
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZA-C10+* 275.27 0.868 BUTA-PR-B-TZD-C10+* 267.04 0.865
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZA-C12+* 306.48 0.878 BUTA-PR-B-TZD-C12+* 298.20 0.875
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZA-C20+* 422.37 0.906 BUTA-PR-B-TZD-C20+* 413.03 0.904
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZA-C30+* 552.05 0.929 BUTA-PR-B-TZD-C30+* 538.49 0.927
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZA-C36+* 634.50 0.940 BUTA-PR-B-TZD-C36+* 624.63 0.940
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZB-C10+* 272.69 0.867 BUTA-PR-B-TZF-C10+* 244.32 0.854
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZB-C12+* 304.40 0.877 BUTA-PR-B-TZF-C12+* 275.51 0.866
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZB-C20+* 422.19 0.906 BUTA-PR-B-TZF-C20+* 386.21 0.898
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZB-C30+* 553.57 0.929 BUTA-PR-B-TZF-C30+* 509.99 0.925
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZB-C36+* 631.75 0.940 BUTA-PR-B-TZF-C36+* 587.75 0.940
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZF-C10+* 243.20 0.855 BUTA-PR-B-TZG-C10+* 252.50 0.858
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZF-C12+* 273.79 0.867 BUTA-PR-B-TZG-C12+* 284.05 0.870
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZF-C20+* 383.00 0.901 BUTA-PR-B-TZG-C20+* 393.53 0.900
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZF-C30+* 508.68 0.933 BUTA-PR-B-TZG-C30+* 517.79 0.925
HMB-Nor-Sou-TZF-C36+* 585.50 0.956 BUTA-PR-B-TZG-C36+* 605.38 0.940
ALHU-PR-A-TZF-G-HAB-C10+* 247.21 0.865 BUTA-PR-B-U6-U7-C10+* 277.40 0.869
ALHU-PR-A-TZF-G-HAB-C12+* 278.17 0.879 BUTA-PR-B-U6-U7-C12+* 308.76 0.879
ALHU-PR-A-TZF-G-HAB-C20+* 388.76 0.921 BUTA-PR-B-U6-U7-C20+* 423.50 0.907
ALHU-PR-A-TZF-G-HAB-C30+* 511.95 0.980 BUTA-PR-B-U6-U7-C30+* 548.30 0.929
ALHU-PR-A-TZF-G-HAB-C36+* 596.50 1.060 BUTA-PR-B-U6-U7-C36+* 630.75 0.940
BUTA-PR-B-TZA-C10+* 304.87 0.878 BUTA-PR-B-U8-C10+* 274.92 0.868
BUTA-PR-B-TZA-C12+* 335.21 0.886 BUTA-PR-B-U8-C12+* 306.25 0.878
BUTA-PR-B-TZA-C20+* 450.92 0.911 BUTA-PR-B-U8-C20+* 422.31 0.906
BUTA-PR-B-TZA-C30+* 578.72 0.931 BUTA-PR-B-U8-C30+* 549.49 0.929
BUTA-PR-B-TZA-C36+* 664.25 0.940 BUTA-PR-B-U8-C36+* 632.38 0.940
BUTA-PR-B-TZB-C10+* 281.82 0.870 BUN-PR-D-TZE-F-HAB-C10+* 243.20 0.855
BUTA-PR-B-TZB-C12+* 312.55 0.880 BUN-PR-D-TZE-F-HAB-C12+* 273.79 0.867
BUTA-PR-B-TZB-C20+* 428.31 0.908 BUN-PR-D-TZE-F-HAB-C20+* 383.00 0.901
BUTA-PR-B-TZB-C30+* 556.79 0.930 BUN-PR-D-TZE-F-HAB-C30+* 508.68 0.933
BUTA-PR-B-TZB-C36+* 637.38 0.940 BUN-PR-D-TZE-F-HAB-C36+* 585.50 0.956
BUTA-PR-B-TZC-C10+* 273.43 0.867 BUQ-TZF-C10+* 243.20 0.855
BUTA-PR-B-TZC-C12+* 305.21 0.877 BUQ-TZF-C12+* 273.79 0.867
BUTA-PR-B-TZC-C20+* 421.18 0.906 BUQ-TZF-C20+* 383.00 0.901
BUTA-PR-B-TZC-C30+* 549.18 0.929 BUQ-TZF-C30+* 508.68 0.933
BUTA-PR-B-TZC-C36+* 631.38 0.940 BUQ-TZF-C36+* 585.50 0.956
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 26 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
6.5 Crude Blending and Conditioning
The well fluids from oil producer wells are blended and conditioning before arriving at Haliba
Phase II CDS. The blending and conditioning arrangement is typical for all prospects,
therefore, only one of the prospects is covered in this report.
The feed stream of each well is simulated based on the respective reservoir composition
and conditions provided in the PVT Report. The feed stream is first saturated with water as
the composition provided in the PVT Report is in dry basis. The fluid is then routed to multi-
stage separator (3 stages) which allows adequate flashing and provides accurate
compositional result. The operating conditions of these separators are modelled per the
multi-stage separator test conditions specified in the PVT Report; the water saturated feed
stream enters the Stage 1 Separator which is operates at 300 psia and 140 °F, the liquid
phase from Stage 1 Separator is then routed to Stage 2 Separator. The Stage 2 Separator
operates at 100 psia and 140 °F, liquid phase of this separator is then sent to Last
Separator which operates at 15 psia and 60 °F. The vapor outlet of the three separators are
joined and cooled down to 60 °F. The flowrate of both vapor and liquid streams are adjusted
to meet the required oil rate as per Table 6.3.1 and GOR. The well fluid is preheated and
routed to the production manifold and blend with the well fluids from other reservoirs /
prospect.
Every prospect is conditioned per the methodology described above and blended
maintaining the individual design flowrate. The following parameters are adjusted at the inlet
of the CDS: pressure, temperature, flowrates, H2S and water content are adjusted to meet
the specific production scenario.
The well fluids from each prospect (i.e. Haliba Main Body, Haliba South, Haliba North, Al
Humrah, Bu Tasah, Bu Nikhelah and Bu Qalla) joints at the inlet production manifold of
CDS. The operating conditions of production manifold specified in Section 6.1 are used in
the simulation model. The blended well fluids are then routed to a three phase separator
(dummy separator) which used to separate the gas, oil and water phases of the well fluids.
Downstream of this separator, the flowrate of gas, oil and water are adjusted (to achieve the
required flowrate of each case, refer Section 6.2) via make-up streams. The make-up
streams have the similar operating conditions and compositions of the streams to be
adjusted. The adjusted gas, oil and water streams are then joint at the production manifold
and the H2S content in the gas phase is adjusted to meet the required value (i.e. 500 ppmv
for material selection whilst 60 ppmv for all other cases).
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 27 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
The Haliba CDS Process Scheme shall be designed for the production provided in Table
6.5.1 which is achieved with three identical trains, each of capacity 72 MBOPD (Technical
rate) with associated export gas and produced water.
Table 6.5.1 – Summary Table for 216 MBOPD Cases

Case Description Remarks

Maximum Oil and Gas (Year 2024) H2S content of 60 ppmv in well
216 MBOPD Case (Summer): fluid (gas phase);
216 MBOPD Stabilized Crude, 75 Three (3) Oil Processing Trains in
MMSCFD Export Gas and Produced Water operation.
of 127 MBWPD (including wash water). (Technical Rate)

Maximum Oil and Gas (Year 2024) H2S content of 60 ppmv in well
216 MBOPD Case (Winter): fluid (gas phase);
216 MBOPD Stabilized Crude, 75 Three (3) Oil Processing Trains in
MMSCFD Export Gas and Produced Water operation.
of 127 MBWPD (including wash water). (Technical Rate)

Maximum Water (Year 2028) H2S content of 60 ppmv in well


216 MBOPD Case (Summer): fluid (gas phase);
110.5 MBOPD Stabilized Crude, 38.3 Three (3) Oil Processing Trains in
MMSCFD Export Gas and Produced Water operation.
of 265 MBWPD (including wash water). (Technical Rate)

Maximum Water (Year 2028) H2S content of 60 ppmv in well


216 MBOPD Case (Winter): fluid (gas phase);
110.5 MBOPD Stabilized Crude, 38.3 Three (3) Oil Processing Trains in
MMSCFD Export Gas and Produced Water operation.
of 265 MBWPD (including wash water). (Technical Rate)

6.6 Product Specifications


6.6.1 Export Crude Oil
The following Table 6.6.1 summarizes the stabilised crude specifications for export.

Table 6.6.1 – Stabilised Crude Specifications

Parameter Specification
Salt 18 PTB
Basic Sediment and Water 0.1% by volume
H2S 50 ppmw
10 psia – Winter;
Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)
6.2 psia – Summer
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 28 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
6.6.2 Export Gas
The export gas specifications shall be as follows:
• Water content: ≤ 7 lb/MMSCF.
• The gas shall be treated to ensure that corrosion rate in the export pipeline is within
acceptable limit for carbon steel material to avoid hydrate formation.
• Water, H2S and CO2 specification – to meet the material requirement and to meet ADNOC
Gas Processing / ADNOC Onshore ASAB CDS limits for the required quantity.

6.6.3 Disposal Water


The disposal water specification shall be as per Table 6.6.3.
Table 6.6.3 – Disposal Water Specifications

Parameter Specification
400 ppmv (Normal)
Dispersed Oil in Water
1,000 ppmv (Max Excursion)
The water shall be treated to ensure that
corrosion rate in the water pipeline is
H 2S
within acceptable limit for carbon steel
material.

Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/l

7.0 SITE CONDITIONS


7.1 Climatic Conditions
The following Table 7.1.1 provides the climatic conditions used for study.
Table 7.1.1 – Temperatures

Parameter Data
Maximum Solar 85 °C
Maximum Shade 58 °C
Minimum Shade 4 °C (Note-1)
Summer – Average 36 °C
Winter – Average 22 °C
Yearly – Average 28 °C
Max. Soil at 1 m depth 38 °C
Min. Soil at 1 m depth 13 °C
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 29 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 7.1.2 – Air Temperatures for design of various equipment under shade or Indoors

Parameter Data
Air Cooler in main process 55 °C (Note-2)
Air Cooler – others 55 °C (Note-2)
Air Cooler Approach to ambient 10 °C
Gas Turbines 55 °C
Electric Generator / Motors 55 °C
Electrical equipment 55 °C (40 °C indoor)
Instrumentation equipment 58 °C
Air Compressor 55 °C
Diesel / gas engines 58 °C

Notes:
1. Minimum ambient temperature of 4 °C shall be considered for depressurisation /
blowdown, etc. design irrespective of whether system is under shade or open.
2. Minimum air temperature during winter as 22 °C shall be considered for air cooler
design.

8.0 PLANT CAPACITY


The following two terminologies are used to refer the plant capacity:
Sustainable Rate refers to plateau production rate without any margin
Technical Rate refers to plateau Sustainable Rate multiplied by an operating margin of 1.2
The Haliba Phase II CDS is designed to produce 216 MBOPD (Technical rate), 75
MMSCFD export gas and 265 MBWPD produced water including wash water from three (3)
Oil and Gas Treatment trains. Each train will produce 72 MBOPD (Technical rate) with
associated export gas and produced water. Flexibility shall be provided to retain or remove
one (1) train during EPC stage of the Project.

9.0 PLANT TURNDOWN


The CDS is designed for turndown capacity of 30% of Sustainable flowrate, operating with
one (1) train (18 MBOPD).

10.0 DESIGN LIFE


The Central Degassing Station shall be designed for design life of 30 years.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 30 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.0 CDS CONFIGURATION ANALYSIS
11.1 Wet Crude Handling System

11.1.1 Production Manifold

The production manifold is sized to cater the design case with an operating pressure of
250 psig. This operating pressure is set intending to provide minimum resistance
(backpressure) to the production lines (trunklines / flowlines) when the wellhead flowing
pressure (source) is 350 – 650 psig depending on the field/location. For details, refer to
Hydraulic Simulation Report – Gathering Facilities and Export Pipelines (Doc. No. 60-10-
11-2601). The production lines routed to the three (3) production manifolds which is
dedicated for each oil processing train intends to maintain equal distribution of flow to all
three oil processing trains.

11.1.2 1st Stage Separator

The well fluids arrive production manifold at the pressure of 250 psig and flow towards the
1st Stage Separator. The 1st Stage Separator is a three phase separator operating at 220
psig and used as first stage separation of the crude, gas and formation water. The
operating pressure of this separator takes into account the pressure losses from the
production manifold to the separator. The operating pressure is selected to avoid an
additional back pressure to the production gathering system, and to provide a good
distribution of the overall gas obtained in the gas separation and crude stabilization
processes. The key process specifications considered for this separator are, a) maximum
5% v/v (Note 1) of water content at the crude outlet stream, and, b) maximum oil in water
content of 1,000 ppmv at the water outlet stream leaving the separator to the Produced
Water Skim Tank. The separated wet crude from 1st Stage Separator is routed to Crude
Inlet Heater. The separated gas from 1st Stage Separator is routed to the HP 1st Stage
Compressor Suction KO Drum via pressure control.
Note 1: 1st Stage Separator sizing is based on 2% v/v water in oil; however, downstream
system is designed for 5% v/v water in oil.

11.1.3 Crude Inlet Heater

The Crude Inlet Heater is a heat conservation shell and tube type exchanger to maximize
the heat recovery from crude stabilization process. The wet crude from the High Pressure
Separator flows through the tube side of exchangers, exchanging heat with the high
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 31 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
temperature stabilized crude from the stabilization process flowing through the shell side.
These exchangers are used to heat the wet crude to 130 °F (summer) / 105 °F (winter),
before entering to the 2nd Stage Separator. The stabilized crude product is pre-cooled in
the Crude Inlet Heater and routed to the Stabilized Crude Cooler for final cooling to
achieve the crude export temperature, 149 °F maximum.

11.1.4 2nd Stage Separator

A three phase separator operating at 50 psig is provided as second stage separation of


the crude, formation water and gas. The operating pressure of the 2nd Stage Separator is
selected to meet the following intent: a) to allow the gravity flow of the water separated
from the Separator to the Produced Water Skim Tank, b) the resulting wet crude
composition provides minimum 25-50 psi difference between the gas breakout pressure
and the selected operating pressure of the 1st / 2nd Stage Desalter at the operating
temperature. The key process specifications considered for this separator are: a)
maximum 5 % v/v (Note 1) of water content in the crude outlet stream, and; b) maximum
oil in water content of 1,000 ppmv at the water outlet stream leaving the separator to the
Produced Water Skim Tank. The separated wet crude from 2nd Stage Separator is routed
to 1st Stage Desalter via 1st Stage Desalter Feed Pumps. The gas from 2nd Stage
Separator is routed to the LP 1st and 2nd Interstage Compressor Suction KO Drum via
pressure control.
Note 1: 2nd Stage Separator sizing is based on 2% v/v water in oil; however, downstream
system is designed for 5% v/v water in oil.

11.1.5 1st Stage Desalter Feed Pumps

The 1st Stage Desalter Pumps are centrifugal type pumps, providing 175 psig discharge
pressure to meet the following intent: a) to transfer the wet crude hydraulically from the 2nd
Stage Separator to the inlet of the stabilization process, b) to maintain minimum 25-50 psi
difference between the gas breakout pressure and the operating pressure of the 1st and
2nd Stage Desalter at the operating temperature.

11.1.6 Wet Crude Heaters

The Wet Crude Heaters are Shell and Tube type heat exchanger provided to heat the wet
crude oil to 150 °F for Dehydration and Desalting processes. This will facilitate breaking of
emulsions and promote better separation. The wet crude flows to the tube side of each
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 32 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
exchanger with hot oil on the shell side. The dehydration temperature is set based on
ADCO Process Design Guideline (Doc. No. 30-99-11-0008).

11.1.7 1st Stage Desalter

Wet crude from Wet Crude Heater flows to the 1st Stage Desalter, for further separation of
water from crude oil. The 1st Stage Desalter is an electrostatic treater that operates full of
liquid intended to remove the water to 0.1 % v/v of the crude outlet stream, whilst the
water outlet stream is set to 1,000 ppmv of oil in water. The pressure in the 1st Stage
Desalter is maintained at 140 psig which satisfies two process conditions, i.e. a) ensure
the operating pressure of minimum 25-50 psi above the gas breakout pressure of the
crude at the operating temperature, and b) sufficient pressure head to maintain the
pressure profile of the Dehydration/Desalting system to reach the Crude Stabilization inlet
hydraulically and the Produced Water Skim Tank. The maximum TDS of 220,000 mg/l is
considered at the inlet of the Dehydration / Desalting System.

11.1.8 2nd Stage Desalter

The 2nd Stage Desalter is an electrostatic treater that operates full of liquid intended to
remove the salt content of the crude up to 18 ptb. The operating pressure of 2nd Stage
Desalter is maintained at 110 psig to satisfy two process conditions, a) ensure the
operating pressure minimum of 25-50 psi above the gas breakout pressure of the crude at
the operating temperature, and b) sufficient pressure head to maintain the pressure profile
of the Desalting system to reach the Crude Stabilization inlet. The water removed from the
2nd Stage Desalter is routed to the inlet of 1st Stage Desalter via 2nd Stage Desalter
Recycle Wash Water Pumps.

11.1.9 2nd Stage Desalter Recycle Wash Water Pumps

The 2nd Stage Desalter Recycle Wash water pumps are provided to ensure sufficient head
to cater the pressure losses up to mixing valves provided at inlet of 1st / 2nd Stage
Desalter. The pump flowrate is 5% by volume of the dry crude entering the 1st / 2nd Stage
Desalter.

11.2 Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration Analysis


The Crude Stabilization Unit is provided to achieve the required RVP and H2S specification.
Each oil train shall be designed to handle 72 MBOPD with 0.1 % v/v water content, and to
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 33 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
achieve crude oil RVP of maximum 6.2 psia (summer) and 10 psia (winter), and a H2S
content not more than 50 ppmw. Hot Oil is used as heating medium.
The stabilized crude is pumped by the Crude Transfer Pumps to the Flow Suction Tanks via
Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger, Crude Inlet Heater and Stabilised Crude Coolers.
The following Options are considered for Crude Stabilization at CDS:
• Option 1 - Use of Stabilizer with Compressor System (LP/HP) and TEG based GDU.
• Option 2 - Use of Stripper with Compressor System (LP/HP) and DPCU (HC recovery).
• Option 3 - Use of an additional Separation Stage with heating and Compressor System
(LP/HP) with TEG based GDU.

Note:
1. DPCU is considered for Option 2 provided this type of Crude Stabilization process enrich
the gas coming off the stripper column requiring further recovery of the oil losses. MEG
injection is used to suppress the hydrate.

11.2.1 Option 1 - Use of a Stabilizer with Compressor System (LP/HP) and TEG based GDU

The Crude Stabilization Unit based on this Option refers a trayed column with reboiler
allocated to achieve the required RVP and H2S specification. The Column is also provided
with Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchangers to optimize the energy required to achieve
the process specification. The operating pressure at the top of the column is selected as
20 psig. This would require Hot Oil as heating medium to be supplied at 390 °F to the
Reboilers, i.e. with sufficient margin below its degradation temperature 550 °F. The
allocated ∆T is intended to protect the hot oil for start-up, normal and upset cases. During
start-up, it is expected a higher operating temperature of hot oil (20 – 30% higher than
normal operating temperature).
The following Figure 11.2.1.1 provides the process scheme of Crude Stabilization Using
Stabilizer with TEG based GDU. The Table 11.2.1.1 provides the key parameters of this
option. This section shall be read in-conjunction with Section 11.4.1 Gas Dehydration by
TEG.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 34 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.2.1.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Stabilizer with TEG based GDU – Process
Scheme
Export Gas to
ASAB

LP & HP
TEG based
Compression
PCV GDU
System

Dry Crude
from 1st / 2nd
Stage
Desalter To Crude
Inlet
Heater
Stabilizer

Feed /
Bottom Heat
Exchangers

Crude Hot Oil I n


Transfer Hot Oil O ut
Pumps
Reboiler

Table 11.2.1.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Stabilizer with TEG based GDU – Key Process and
Sizing Parameters
Parameter Summer Winter
Operating Pressure – Top/Bottom of Stabilizer (psig) 20 / 23
Operating Temperature – Top/Bottom of Stabilizer (°F) 146 / 202 139 / 175
Number of Theoretical Trays 4
Number of Actual Trays 15 (including Chimney Tray)
Maximum Heat Duty (Reboilers) (MW) 6.3 3.9
Maximum Heat Duty (Feed/Bottom Exchangers) (MW) 2.5 1.4
Stabilizer - Gas Flowrate (MMSCFD) 4.2 3.6
Preliminary Stabilizer Size 4.2 m Diameter x 20.2 m T-T
RVP / TVP @ 37.8 °C (psia) 5.92 / 8.45 9.23 / 14.61
Oil Recovery (%) (Note 1, 2) 98 98
LP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 5.17 4.63
LP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 0.28 0.25
LP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 9.97 9.77
LP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 0.54 0.52
LP Compressor 3rd Stage (MMSCFD) 9.81 9.76
LP Compressor 3rd Stage Duty (MW) 0.53 0.53
HP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 26.56 25.73
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 35 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Parameter Summer Winter


HP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 1.20 1.13
HP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 26.51 25.73
HP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 1.16 1.14
TEG Circulation Rate (m3/h) 4 4

Notes:
1. Oil recovered at Stabilizer.
2. Oil recovery = (Oil at the outlet of Stabilizer / Oil at the inlet of Stabilizer) x 100%.

Main Process Equipment


• 1 x 100% Stabilizer (4.2 m Diameter x 20.2 m T-T) and Internals (trays).
• 2 x 50% Reboilers (6.3 MW total duty).
• 2 x 50% Feed/Bottom Heat Exchangers (2.5 MW total duty).

Cost Estimation
Refer to Section 11.2.5 for cost estimation.

11.2.2 Option 2 - Use of a Stripper with Compressor System (LP/HP) and DPCU (HC Recovery)

The Crude Stabilization Unit based on this Option, refers a trayed column utilizing Fuel
Gas as stripping medium to assist the crude stabilization process and meet the required
RVP and H2S specification. This Option does not use any heating medium.

In order to maximize the oil recovery of the Crude Stabilization Unit based on Stripper
operation, the CDS under this crude stabilization approach is provided with DPCU (HC
recovery via MEG injection) that can assist with both water and hydrocarbons (dew
pointing) removal from the gas. The hydrocarbons can be recovered, stabilized and spiked
at the discharge of the MOL pumps.

The vapour from Stripper overhead is first compressed in the LP and HP Compression
System and then routed to the MEG Injection System. In the MEG Injection System, the
treated gas (dry gas) is exported via pipeline whilst the HC condensate collected in the
Glycol Flash Drum is sent to the HC Condensate Strippers for stabilization. The recovered
stabilized HC condensate is injected in the MOL. The gas coming off the HC Condensate
Strippers is recovered back to the Fuel Gas System. The recycle of this gas back to the
CDS Compression System shall be avoided as increases significantly the size and power
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 36 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
demand of the CDS LP/HP Compression System. The oil export RVP specification is
achievable with this configuration. The Figure 11.2.2.1 presents the process scheme for
Stripper with DPCU (HC recovery via MEG injection) and Table 11.2.2.1 presents the key
parameters of this option. This section shall be read in-conjunction with Section 11.4.2
MEG Injection System.

Figure 11.2.2.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Stripper with DPCU – Process Scheme
Export Gas to
ASAB

LP & HP
Compression DPCU
PCV System
Off Gas
to FG
HC System
Condensate
from Cold
Separator
Dry Crude
from 1st / 2nd
Stage
Desalter

HC
Stripper
Condensate
Stripper

Stripping
Gas

Wet Crude To 2nd


Stage Separator

Crude
Transfer
Pumps Stabilized Export
Crude Export Crude to
System ASAB
Crude Inlet
Heater Stabilised
Crude
Wet Crude Coolers
from 1st
Stage
Separator

Table 11.2.2.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Stripper with DPCU – Key Process and Sizing
Parameters

Parameters Summer Winter


Operating Pressure – Top/Bottom of Stripper (psig) 3/5 3/5
Operating Temperature – Top/Bottom of Stripper (°F) 136.3 135.9
Number of Theoretical Trays 8
Number of Actual Trays 15 (including Chimney Tray)
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 37 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Parameters Summer Winter


Stripping Gas Flowrate (MMSCFD) 1 -
Stripper - Gas Flowrate (MMSCFD) 6.74 4.88
Preliminary Stripper Size 6 m Diameter x 25 m T-T
RVP / TVP @ 37.8 °C (psia) 5.41 / 15.34 6.72 / 11.43
Recovered Oil (%) (before Spiking HC Condensate in
96 96
MOL) (Note 1)
Recovered Oil from Stripper (BOPD) 71,450 71,240
LP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 8.79 6.01
LP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 0.53 0.37
LP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 14.54 11.95
LP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 0.87 0.71
LP Compressor 3rd Stage (MMSCFD) 14.25 11.79
LP Compressor 3rd Stage Duty (MW) 0.83 0.70
HP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 33.48 30.29
HP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 1.56 1.36
HP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 33.30 30.29
HP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 1.45 1.35
HC Condensate from Condensate Stripper
1,013 860
(barrel/day)
Recovered Oil (%) (after Spiking HC Condensate in
96.8 97.6
MOL) (Note 2)
RVP / TVP @ 37.8 °C at HC Condensate Stripper
31.12 / 31.86 25.78 / 26.43
(psia)
Combined RVP / TVP @ 37.8 °C (psia) (Oil & HC
5.66 / 14.67 6.95 / 11.64
Condensate)
Operating Pressure – Top/Bottom of HC Condensate
290 / 293 290 / 293
Stripper (psig)
Overhead Gas from HC Condensate Stripper
4.51 3.76
(MMSCFD) (Note 3)
Export Gas after HC Condensate Recovery
74.7 74.9
(MMSCFD)
MEG Circulation Rate (m3/h) 1 1

Note:
1. Oil recovery = (Oil at the outlet of Stripper / Oil at the inlet of Stripper) x 100%.
2. Oil recovery = (Oil at the outlet of Stripper + Oil at the outlet of HC Condensate
Stripper / Oil at the inlet of Stripper) x 100%.
3. The overhead gas from HC Condensate Stripper will be used as fuel gas.

Cost Estimation
Refer to Section 11.2.5 for cost estimation.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 38 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.2.3 Option 3 - Use of an additional Separation Stage with heating and Compressor System
(LP/HP) with TEG based GDU

The Crude Stabilization Unit based on this Option, refers a scheme that utilizes a heater
and a two phase separator operating at 5 psig to achieve the required RVP and H2S
specification. The Option requires Hot Oil as heating medium.
The following Figure 11.2.3.1 provides the process scheme of Crude Stabilization using
additional Separation Stage with heating and TEG based GDU. The Table 11.2.3.1
provides the key parameters of this option. This section shall be read in-conjunction with
Section 11.4.1 Gas Dehydration by TEG.

Figure 11.2.3.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Separation Stage with TEG based GDU –
Process Scheme
Export Gas to
ASAB

LP & HP
TEG based
Compression
Hot Oil PCV GDU
Out System

Wet Crude To 2nd


Dry Crude LP Stage Separator
from 1st / 2nd Separator
Stage (5 psig)
Desalter LP MOL
Heater Flow Booster
Crude to
Suction Pumps
Export
Hot Oil Tanks
In
Crude Inlet
Crude Transfer Heater Stabilised MOL
Pumps Crude Pumps
Wet Crude Bypass
(Alternate Coolers
Booster Pump) from 1st
Stage
Separator
Stabilization Section

Table 11.2.3.1 – Crude Stabilization Using Separation Stage with TEG based GDU – Key
Process and Sizing Parameters
Parameter Summer Winter
Operating Pressure (psig) 5
Operating Temperature (°F) 170 145
Maximum Heat Duty (Heater) (MW) 3.6 -
Separator – Gas Flowrate (MMSCFD) 5.9 5.6
Preliminary Vessel Size 4.9 m Diameter x 12 m T/T
RVP / TVP @ 37.8 °C (psia) 5.98 / 9.80 7.45 / 12.86
Oil Recovery (%) (Note 1, 2) 96 96
LP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 7.40 6.20
LP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 0.52 0.43
LP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 12.77 11.19
LP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 0.69 0.60
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 39 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Parameter Summer Winter


LP Compressor 3rd Stage (MMSCFD) 11.98 11.02
LP Compressor 3rd Stage Duty (MW) 0.62 0.59
HP Compressor 1st Stage (MMSCFD) 27.67 26.74
HP Compressor 1st Stage Duty (MW) 1.28 1.20
HP Compressor 2nd Stage (MMSCFD) 27.53 26.74
HP Compressor 2nd Stage Duty (MW) 1.19 1.19
TEG Circulation Rate (m3/h) 4 4

Note:
1. Oil recovered at LP Separator.
2. Oil recovery = (Oil at the outlet of LP Separator / Oil at the inlet of LP Separator) x
100%.

Cost Estimation
Refer to Section 11.2.5 for cost estimation.

11.2.4 Comparison of Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration

The Table 11.2.4.1 presents the summary table of the Crude Stabilization Unit options.

Table 11.2.4.1 – Crude Stabilization Unit Comparison Table

Options Advantages Disadvantages

• Conventional and proven • High capital investment among the


system. This is the preferred proposed options.
arrangement to stabilize crude oil
• Medium to large layout
in oil and gas industry.
requirements.
• The stabilized crude can be used
• Higher tendency of crude
to exchange heat (recovery) with
degradation, since stabilization
the wet crude from the 1st Stage
process takes place at higher
Separators to the 2nd Stage
temperature i.e. 200 °F (presence
Separators enhancing the
1. Use of of coke at Column bottom).
separation / dehydration
Stabilizer
process. • Requires large quantity of
instrumentation at trays.
• Compatible for well fluid
composition uncertainties. • Risk of flooding, foaming and
fouling.
• Higher oil recover among all
options. • Risk of mal function of internals
(weeping) during turndown
condition.
• Maintenance/Replacement of
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 40 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Options Advantages Disadvantages


Column internals.
• Required surveillance and
maintenance at elevated platforms.

• The Option does not require heat • Highest capital investment among
exchangers and heating the proposed options.
medium.
• The stabilized crude has not
• Requires minimum footprint sufficient heat to provide the wet
compared with Option 1 and 3. crude in the separation process
which is detriment to the
• Simpler operations.
dehydration and breaking the
emulsion process.
• Requires large quantity of
instrumentation at trays.
• Risk of flooding, foaming and
fouling.
• The stripping gas combined with
2. Use of the Stripper gas is routed to the LP
Stripper Compressor increasing its capacity
and power requirements more than
double than the case of Option 1.
• Requires MEG Unit, Propane Unit
and HC Stabilization Unit to
compensate the oil recovery
comparable to Option 1.
• Risk of mal function of internals
(weeping) during turndown
condition.
• Maintenance/Replacement of
Column internals.
• Requires surveillance, and
maintenance at elevated platforms.

• Fit for purpose and cost-effective • Limited capacity to achieve deep


process scheme to achieve the stabilization, however the required
RVP and the H2S specification. RVP and H2S specification can be
achieved.
3. Use of an • Less heating requirements
additional compared with Option 1. • Less adaptable scheme to absorb
Separation changes in the crude composition
• Easy to install / construct,
Stage with (uncertainties).
operate and maintain.
heating
• Minimum plot / layout
requirements.
• The stabilized crude can be used
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 41 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Options Advantages Disadvantages


to exchange heat (recovery) with
the wet crude from the 1st Stage
Separators to the 2nd Stage
Separators enhancing the
separation / dehydration
process.
• Provides sufficient holdup time
for a smooth crude transfer
operation from the Stabilization
Unit to the Flow Suction Tanks.
• The stability of the crude transfer
process of this Option provides
the flexibility to use these pumps
as (alternate) booster pumps in
combination with the MOL
Pumps (if required) increasing
the reliability of the crude export
process, with a potential
optimization of the number of
Flow Suction Tanks. This is a
key argument to justify the
deletion of one of the three Flow
Suction Tanks proposed during
ASSESS stage of the project
(savings of more than MUSD
2.0).
• Reduced risk of working at
heights compared with Option 1
and 2.
• The separator (vessel) can be
transported as one equipment
(ease logistics).

11.2.5 Cost Estimation of Crude Stabilization Unit Configuration

The Table 11.2.5.1 and 11.2.5.2 present the cost estimation for both CAPEX and OPEX of
the Crude Stabilization Unit options. The cost is estimated based on one oil processing
train.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 42 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.2.5.1 – Crude Stabilization Unit Cost Estimation Table (CAPEX)
Equipment / System
Options Cost (MUSD)
(Key Differentiators)

Stabilizer Column 1.0

Stabilizer Reboilers 0.6

Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchangers 0.3

Stabilized Crude Cooler 0.5

Stabilizer Compression System - 1 LP/HP Train (3.7 MW) 5.0

TEG based GDU 2.0

Associated Utilities and Infrastructure 1.0

Hot Oil System (Common) 5.0

Total Option 1 15.4

Stripper Column 1.0

Compression System - 1 LP/HP Train (5.2 MW) 7.1

MEG 2.0

Propane Unit 4.0


Stripper + HC
Recovery HC Stabilization Unit (2x50% Columns, Pumps,
6.0
Reboilers, Cooler)

Associated Utilities and Infrastructure 2.0

Hot Oil System (Common) 3.0

Total Option 2 25.1

LP Separator 0.6

LP Separator LP Crude Heaters 0.5

Crude Export Cooler 0.5


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 43 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Equipment / System
Options Cost (MUSD)
(Key Differentiators)

Compression System - 1 LP/HP Train (4.3 MW) 5.8

TEG 2.0

Hot Oil System (Common) 3.0

Associated Utilities and Infrastructure 1.0

Total Option 3 13.4

Table 11.2.5.2 – Crude Stabilization Unit Cost Estimation Table (OPEX)

Key Operational Differentiator / Cost


Option Equipment / System
Cost
Power (MW) / Others
(MUSD/year)
Internals (Prorated per
Stabilizer Column year, occurs only during 0.1
shutdown)

Crude Export Cooler 2.0 0.77

Compression System
3.7 1.42
( 1 LP/HP Train)

Stabilizer TEG (4 m3/h) Solvent losses 0.20

Hot Oil System


1.5 0.58
(Common)

Utilities Utilities 0.20

Total Option 1 3.26

Internals (Prorated per


Stripper Column year, occurs only during 0.1
shutdown)
Compression System
5.2 2.00
( 1 LP/HP Train)
Stripper +
HC MEG (1 m3/h) Solvent losses 0.70
Recovery

Propane Unit 2.0 0.77

HC Stabilization Unit
1.0 0.38
(2x50% Columns,
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 44 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Key Operational Differentiator / Cost


Option Equipment / System
Cost
Power (MW) / Others
(MUSD/year)
Pumps, Reboilers,
Coolers)

Hot Oil System


0.9 0.35
(Common)

Utilities Utilities 0.30

Total Option 2 4.25

Crude Export Cooler 2.0 0.77

Compression System
4.3 1.65
( 1 LP/HP Train)

TEG (4 m3/h) Solvent losses 0.2


LP
Separator Hot Oil System
1.5 0.58
(Common)

Utilities Utilities 0.2

Total Option 3 2.82

Findings and Recommendation


The Option 1 based on the use of a Stabilizer column with reboilers and Feed/Bottom Heat
Exchangers allocated to achieve the required RVP and H2S specification is selected due to
the following:
• Conventional and proven system.
• Highest oil recovery among the Options.
• Highest capability to achieve deep stabilization and absorb composition changes.
• This configuration is slightly higher in capital investment and operational cost
compared with Option 3, however presents an oil recovery 2% above the LP
Separator Option.
• The option 3 is ruled out as less adaptable scheme to absorb changes in the crude
composition (uncertainties).
• The Option 2 based on Stripper operation has been dismissed as requires the
highest Capital investment and higher OPEX among the Options; the option is the
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 45 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
highest energy demanding to achieve a comparable oil recovery as the selected
Option 1 (98%). In addition, the Option 2 is highly dependent on chemical
(demulsifier) demand, to compensate the lack of heat on the stabilized crude coming
out the Stripper has not sufficient heat to provide the wet crude in the separation
process which is detriment to the dehydration and breaking the emulsion process.

11.3 Gas Compression System Configuration


The gases from the 2nd Stage Separator, Crude Stabilization Unit and Recovered gas from
the Flare Gas Recovery Ejectors Package are routed to the Low Pressure (LP) Gas
Compression System. The discharge of the LP Gas Compression system is directed along
with the gas from the 1st Stage Separator to the High Pressure (HP) Gas Compression
system. One LP and HP Gas Compression train will handle the associated gas from One Oil
train. The compression stages within LP and HP Gas Compressors are considered with
equal pressure ratio. Each gas Compressor is provided with its own Suction Knock Out
Drum, After cooler (Air cooler - forced draft type) and Discharge Knock Out Drum. The
discharge pressure of the CDS Compression system (1098 psig) is set to overcome the
pressure drops inside the plant battery limit and the export gas pipeline to meet the required
pressure at ADNOC Gas Processing ASAB 0/3 Facility tie-in pressure of 232 psig (16 barg).

11.3.1 Compression Trains Capacity Rationale

The maximum export gas flowrate of 75 MMSCFD is proposed to be arranged at 4 x


33.3% Compression trains which includes three (3) trains in operation and one (1) train in
standby. The gas export capacity per train is 25 MMSCFD. This configuration provides the
flexibility to remove / retain one (1) train during EPC stage of Project.

11.3.2 Compressors Discharge Temperature Limitations

For the purpose of CDS Gas Compression System configuration, the study assumes the
following temperature limits (Table 11.3.2.1) for the operating temperature of the discharge
stream of every Compressor stage.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 46 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.3.2.1 – Compressor Discharge Temperature Limitations
Maximum Discharge
Compressors Type
Temperature (°F)
Centrifugal 300
Positive Displacement 285

The temperature limits indicated above will be revisited during selection of the
Compressors in conjunction with the Compressor suppliers.
The following Options are considered for the configuration of the Gas Compression
System.
Option 1 – Provide two stages of LP Gas Compression and two stages of HP Gas
Compression (Initial Approach)
The compression scheme for this Option is presented in Figure 11.3.2.1 and Operational
Parameters are presented in Table 11.3.2.2 and 11.3.2.3.

Figure 11.3.2.1 – Two stage LP and HP Gas Compression Scheme


nd
From 2
Stage
Separator

From
Stabilizer

LP Comp. 1st LP Comp. 2nd LP Comp.


LP Comp. LP Comp.
Stage Suction Stage 2nd Stage
LP Comp. Intercooler Interstage LP Comp.
Aftercooler Discharge
KOD 1st Stage KOD 2nd Stage
KOD
To 2nd Stage To 2nd Stage To 2nd Stage
Separator (via pump) Separator (via pump) Separator

To Gas
Dehydration
Unit
From 1st
Stage
Separator

HP Comp. 2nd HP Comp.


HP Compr. 1st HP Comp. HP Comp. Stage 2nd Stage
Stage Suction HP Comp. Intercooler Interstage HP Comp. Aftercooler Discharge
KOD 1st Stage KOD 2nd Stage
KOD
To 2nd Stage To 1st Stage To 1st Stage
Separator Separator Separator
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 47 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.3.2.2 - Operational Parameters - Summer (Pressure Profile A)
LP-1 LP-2 HP-1 HP-2
Parameter
Suction Discharge Suction Discharge Suction Discharge Suction Discharge

Pressure
5.0 45.0 34.0 132.9 116.9 373.5 362.5 1098
(psig)
Temperature
143.0 252.1 136.8 256.9 122.8 255.7 148.9 291.3
(°F)
Compression
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Ratio
Flowrate
5.27 10.14 27.71 27.63
(MMSCFD)

Table 11.3.2.3 - Operational Parameters - Summer (Pressure Profile B)


LP-1 LP-2 HP-1 HP-2
Parameter
Suction Discharge Suction Discharge Suction Discharge Suction Discharge

Pressure
5.0 55.9 44.9 199.0 183.0 459.9 448.8 1098
(psig)
Temperature
143.1 269.4 138.7 277.9 124.5 235.3 148.9 266.7
(°F)
Compression
3.6 3.6 2.4 2.4
Ratio
Flowrate
5.16 9.81 26.33 26.30
(MMSCFD)

Discussion
According to the distribution of flowrates and pressure, a preliminary selection of the
Compressor type is inclined for the use of Positive Displacement type (Reciprocating /
Screw) for the low pressure section and Centrifugal type for the high pressure section.
In the Compressor configuration based on the pressure profile A, it is noticed that, the LP
compression side is acceptable. For the HP second stage the temperature is 292 °F which
is close to the limit considered for Centrifugal Compressors, which is not recommended.
For the Compressor configuration based on the pressure profile B, it is observed the
temperature of the discharge stream for LP second stage is close to the limit established
for Positive Displacement type of Compressors, i.e. 285 °F. The temperature profile
observed for the HP Compression side falls within the limit established for Centrifugal type
of Compressors. In order to address the high discharge temperature issue on the LP
section one more stage of Compression is added; Refer Option 2. The number of stages
for LP compression to be finalized based on the input / confirmation from compressor’s
supplier.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 48 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Option 2 – Provide three stages of LP Gas Compression and two stages of HP Gas
Compression
The compression scheme for this Option is presented in Figure 11.3.2.2 and Operational
Parameters are presented in Table 11.3.2.4 to 11.3.2.5.

Figure 11.3.2.2 – Three stage LP and HP Gas Compression Scheme


From 2nd
Stage
Separator

From
Stabilizer

LP Comp. 1st LP Comp. 1st LP Comp. LP Comp. 2nd LP Comp. LP Comp. 3rd LP Comp.
Stage Suction Stage After 1st & 2nd Stage 2nd & 3rd Stage 3rd Stage
LP Comp. LP Comp. LP Comp.
Cooler Interstage Aftercooler Interstage Aftercooler Discharge
KOD 1st Stage 2nd Stage 3rd Stage
KOD KOD KOD
To 2nd Stage To 2nd Stage To 2nd Stage To 2nd Stage
Separator (via pump) Separator (via pump) Separator Separator

To Gas
Dehydration
Unit

From 1st
Stage
Separator

HP Comp. 2nd HP Comp.


HP Compr. 1st HP Comp. HP Comp. Stage 2nd Stage
Stage Suction HP Comp. Intercooler Interstage HP Comp. Aftercooler Discharge
KOD 1st Stage KOD 2nd Stage
KOD
To 2nd Stage To 1st Stage To 1st Stage
Separator Separator Separator

Table 11.3.2.4 - Operational Parameters – Base Case (Summer)

LP-1 LP-2 LP-3 HP-1 HP-2


Parameter
Suctio Disch Suctio Discha Suctio Discha Suctio Discha Suctio Discha
n arge n rge n rge n rge n rge

Pressure (psig) 5.0 33.9 22.9 78.1 67.1 187.2 171.2 445.6 434.6 1098.0

Temperature
143.1 232.4 138.2 236.4 148.7 248.0 124.2 238.3 148.9 270.4
(°F)
Compression
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Ratio
Flowrate
5.2 10.0 9.8 26.6 26.5
(MMSCFD)
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 49 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.3.2.5 - Operational Parameters – Base Case (Winter)

LP-1 LP-2 LP-3 HP-1 HP-2


Parameter
Suctio Disch Suctio Discha Suctio Discha Suctio Discha Suctio Discha
n arge n rge n rge n rge n rge

Pressure (psig) 5.0 33.9 22.9 78.1 67.1 187.2 171.2 441.9 430.9 1080.0

Temperature
136.1 226.3 126.2 228.4 148.7 253.2 107.8 223.8 148.9 272.8
(°F)
Compression
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Ratio
Flowrate
4.6 9.8 9.8 25.7 25.7
(MMSCFD)

Discussion
Based on the distribution of the flowrates and pressure a preliminary selection of the
Compressor type is inclined for the use of Positive Displacement type (Reciprocating /
Screw) for both the low pressure section and high pressure section. The compression
ratio, pressure and temperature profiles for the low and high pressure sections are
acceptable. For details, refer to LP and HP Gas Compressors Selection Report (60-01-31-
2601).

Interim Recommendation
Continue the design development with the configuration presented in Option 2 based on
three stages of LP Gas Compression and two stages of HP Gas Compression,
maintaining in perspective the potential optimization of one stage compression of the LP
system provided this is technically acceptable and competitive from a life cycle cost point
of view.

11.4 Gas Dehydration


Two gas dehydration processes are evaluated in line with the Scope of Work Document No.
1-01-99-93-1615:
• Gas Dehydration by TEG Absorption Process.
• Gas Dehydration by MEG Injection Process.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 50 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.4.1 Gas Dehydration by Tri-Ethylene Glycol (TEG) Absorption Process

Process Description
Lean, water-free glycol (purity >99%) is fed to the top of an absorber (also known as a
"Glycol Contactor") where it is contacted with the wet hydrocarbon gas stream. The glycol
removes saturated water from the hydrocarbon gas by physical. Upon exiting the absorber
the glycol stream is often referred to as "rich glycol". The dry hydrocarbon gas leaves the
top of the absorption column and is fed either to a gas pipeline. Glycol absorbers can be
either tray columns or packed columns.
After leaving the absorber, the rich glycol is preheated via still column overhead condenser
before fed to a flash vessel where hydrocarbon vapors are removed and any liquid
hydrocarbons are skimmed from the glycol. This step is necessary as the absorber is
typically operated at high pressure and the pressure must be reduced before the
regeneration step. Due to the composition of the rich glycol, a vapor phase having a high
hydrocarbon content will form when the pressure is lowered.
After leaving the flash vessel, the rich glycol is heated in a cross-exchanger and fed to the
stripper (also known as a regenerator). The glycol stripper consists of a column, an
overhead condenser, and a reboiler. The glycol is thermally regenerated to remove excess
water and regain the high glycol purity.
The hot, lean glycol is cooled by cross-exchange with rich glycol entering the stripper. It is
then fed to a lean pump where its pressure is elevated to that of the glycol absorber. The
lean solvent is cooled again with an air-cooled exchanger before being fed back into the
absorber. The typical Process Scheme of Glycol Absorption is presented in Figure
11.4.1.1.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 51 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Figure 11.4.1.1 – Typical Process Scheme for Glycol Absorption

Advantages / Disadvantages
TEG is a colorless, odorless and stable liquid with low viscosity and high boiling point. It is
miscible in water and hygroscopic in nature. TEG is normally used to dehydrate gas down
to pipeline specification (stringent dehydration requirement).

Advantages
• Higher boiling point compared to MEG.
• Less tendency to degradation compared to other glycol solvents.
• High lean glycol concentration (98.5 – 99.9 wt. %).
• It can achieve water dew point depression temperature ranging from 113 °F (basic
regeneration) to 158 °F (regeneration with stripping gas).
• Low vapor pressure.
• Better thermal stability.
• Low solvent loss.

Disadvantages
• Blockage in cryogenic plants due to freezing of TEG.
• Higher solvent circulation rates compared to MEG.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 52 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.4.2 Gas Dehydration by Mono-Ethylene Glycol Injection Process

Process Description
Feed gas passes through a free water knockout and into a gas-gas exchanger. Lean
glycol solution is sprayed on the tubesheet of the exchanger and travels concurrently with
the hydrocarbon stream into a chiller and then into a glycol hydrocarbon separator. Glycol
and condensed water are withdrawn from the separator boot and sent to a still. The still
regenerates the glycol solution for recycle to the exchanger. Water vapor is usually vented
to the atmosphere from the top of the still. The typical Process Scheme of Glycol Injection
is presented in Figure 11.4.2.1.

Figure 11.4.2.1 – Typical Process Scheme for Glycol Injection System

Warm inlet gas is cross-exchanged with the cold dry sales gas and then flows to the gas
chiller. To prevent hydrates from forming, MEG is injected in the tubes at the warm end of
both exchangers. The temperature of the chiller is adjusted to condense liquids from the
feed gas. The cold gas exiting the chiller together with the rich MEG solution and
condensed hydrocarbons enters the cold three-phase separator. The rich MEG is sent to
the regeneration section of the unit where the water is removed. The resulting lean MEG is
sent back to the process.
In this scheme, the sales gas exiting the gas-to-gas exchanger has a water and
hydrocarbon dew point determined by the operating temperature of the cold separator.
The CAPEX of this system is essentially driven by the gas cooling equipment, including
the refrigeration system. The key point to remember here is that the water is being
removed from the gas by low temperature condensation. The purpose of the injected MEG
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 53 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
is not to “dehydrate” the gas but to prevent formation of hydrates. At the MEG
concentrations normally used in these systems, approximately 80 – 85 wt%, the MEG
absorbs only a small amount of water vapor from the gas.

Advantages / Disadvantages
MEG is a colorless, odorless and non-volatile liquid. It is completely miscible in water and
many organic solvents. MEG is normally used as hydrate inhibitor as it can be recovered
from gas by separation at below ambient temperature. The gas dehydration process is
commonly based on injection system.

Advantages
• Low solvent cost.
• Lower freezing point compared to TEG.
• Lower viscosity compared to TEG.
• Lower solubility in liquid hydrocarbons.

Disadvantages
• Higher vapour pressure compared with TEG (losses).
• Higher tendency to degradation compared to TEG.
• Requires more water (higher dilution) for initial fill compared to TEG.
• Barely used in contactor at ambient temperature due to high losses in the treated gas.
• To minimize solvent losses, the MEG system shall be operated at very low
temperature ranges.
• Less energy efficient compared to TEG.
• Higher corrosion tendency compared to TEG.
• Requires external refrigerant media (e.g. propane) to achieve the low operating
temperatures.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 54 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

11.4.3 Analysis of Gas Dehydration Unit (TEG Dehydration Unit) Location

The TEG Dehydration Units are more compact, cost and energy efficient when the
absorption takes place at high pressure. The location of the TEG Unit in the Gas Plant
(between or after the HP Compression) is evaluated and presented in Table 11.4.3.1:

a) Option A (Base Case) – TEG Unit located downstream of 2nd Stage HP Gas
Compression.
b) Option B – TEG Unit located downstream of 1st Stage HP Gas Compression.

Table 11.4.3.1 – TEG Unit Parameter


Option A (Base
Option B: TEG Unit
Case): TEG Unit
located downstream
Parameters located downstream
of 1st Stage HP
of 2nd Stage HP
Compression
Compression
Inlet Gas Pressure (psig) 1082.0 445.0

Inlet Gas Temperature (°F) 148.7 149.0

Inlet Gas Vol. Flow (MMSCFD) 25.4 26.9

Inlet Gas Water Content (lb/MMSCF) 199.4 490.1

Dry Gas Vol. Flow (MMSCFD) 25.0 25.8

Dry Gas Outlet Water (lb/MMSCF) <7 <7

Off Gas from TEG Units to Ejector (MMSCFD) 0.8 3.0

TEG Circulation Rate (m3/h) 4 10

Stripping Gas Vol. Flow (MMSCFD) 0.2 0.8

Stripping Gas Heater Duty (MW) 0.02 0.04

TEG Reboiler Duty (MW) 0.12 0.33

Interim Recommendation
TEG Unit shall be located downstream of 2nd Stage HP Compression (Option A) due to the
following reasons:
a. Optimum (compact) design compared to Option B. The Option A (Base Case) requires
solvent circulation rate of 4 m3/h which standard GDU modules available in the
market. The TEG circulation rate for Option B is 10 m3/h (44 GPM), likely a “custom-
made” package as exceeds the typical GDU “off the shelf” capacity of maximum 6.8
m3/h (30 GPM).
b. Requires smaller footprint compared to Option B.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 55 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
c. Less power requirement (fuel gas consumption) for option A. The electrical power
required for Stripping Gas Heater and TEG Reboiler of Option B is more than 2 times
of the power of Option A.
d. The operation of Option B generates three times more off gas to the LP/HP Integrated
Flare Gas Recovery Ejectors Package, consequently leads to incremental of gas
compression system capacity and power requirement.
e. Considering the entire HP Compression shall be designed to cater the MOP of the HP
2nd stage (recycle case), there is no savings with respect to install a TEG Unit in
between the HP stages in terms of reduction of the pressure rating (600#).
f. The Option B setup introduces a higher level of complexity if the operation of the Gas
Plant, i.e. the stability of the HP Compression operation would be directly linked to the
stability of the TEG unit. Bypass of the TEG Unit, incremental of the pressure drop
across TEG Unit, fouling, etc. are cases to be considered for the operation /
maintenance of the HP compression.

Based on the above, Consultant recommends to retain the configuration of Base Case in
order to maintain the modular approach for TEG Units, cost effective, easy to operate /
maintain and layout friendly.

11.5 HC CONDENSATE HANDLING AT ASAB

11.5.1 Expected HC Condensate at ASAB

The export gas arriving at ASAB 0/3 tie-in is at the following conditions:
• Pressure, 232 psig (16 barg).
• Temperature of the Gas arrival in ASAB based on steady state hydraulics, 73.4 - 96.1
°F (summer) and 55.4 - 62.8 °F (winter). Refer Hydraulic Simulation Report –
Gathering Facilities and Export Pipelines (60-05-11-2601) for details.
• Water dew point and water content in the export gas at Haliba CDS are ≤ 55 °F @
1,043 psig ≤ 7 lb/MMSCF respectively.
The expected HC condensate generated for the above conditions is presented in the
Table 11.5.1.1.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 56 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.5.1.1 – Expected HC Condensate at ASAB

Export Gas Expected HC Condensate at


Case Flowrate ASAB tie-in @ 50 psig, m3/h
(MMSCFD) Summer Winter
Design Case 75.0 16.4 21.6
Normal Operating
26.9 3.0 6.9
Case (80 MBOPD)
Turndown Case 6.3 0.6 1.6

Note:
1. The maximum HC condensate is 50 m3/h during transient cases (start-up, pigging,
ramp-up, ramp-down).

11.5.2 HC Condensate handling at ASAB

The following options are considered for HC condensate handling at ASAB:


• Option 1 – Heating the HC Condensate to Vapor Phase and use as purge gas.
• Option 2 – HC Condensate to Crude Heater Inlet Manifold at ASAB.

Option 1 – Heating the HC Condensate to Vapor Phase and use as purge gas
The schematic of this option is presented in the Figure 11.5.2.1 below:

Figure 11.5.3.1 - HC Condensate / Purge Gas


ASAB

Flare Header Purging

To Flare
BDV

Tie-in to
Gas ASAB 0/3
HALIBA
Receiver
Gas Pipeline
Central Slug
Degassing Catcher
Station
(CDS)

LCV
HC
Condensate
Electric
Proposed Facilities at ASAB Heater
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 57 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
The capital investment for the Option 1 is ca. 1.5 MUSD with minimum layout impact. The
resulting purge rate is 5.5 MMSCFD that can be used for the relief and blowdown within
Haliba Phase II scope at ASAB.

Option 2 – HC Condensate to Crude Heater Inlet Manifold at ASAB


The schematic of this option is presented in the Figure 11.5.2.2 below:

Figure 11.5.2.2 - HC Condensate to Crude Heater Inlet Manifold at ASAB

ASAB

to Existing
PCV Flare Header
Export Gas to
HP Gas Transfer
Line Tie-in

Inline Filter
Separator

Gas Slug
HALIBA
Receiver Catcher LCV
Gas Pipeline
Central
Degassing HC
Station Condensate to
(CDS) Crude Heater
LCV
Inlet Manifold

Proposed Facilities at ASAB

The capital investment for the Option 2 is ca. 1.2 MUSD with minimum layout impact. The
HC condensate from the Slug Catcher and Inline Filter Separator is tied-in to the Crude
Heater Inlet Manifold at ASAB.

11.5.4 Interim Recommendations


The two Options proposed for HC condensate handling at ASAB are economically
comparable; the Option 2 is selected considering its simplicity, ease of operation and
maintenance, its flexibility to handle HC condensate generated from export gas.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 58 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.6 Water Management
The following Table 11.6.1 and Figure 11.6.1 presents the produced water, wash (make-up)
water and disposal water forecast for Haliba Phase II Project.

Table 11.6.1 – Haliba Phase II Produced Water, Wash Water and Disposal Water Forecast

Crude Oil , Produced Water, Wash Water, Disposal Water,


Year
STBOPD BWPD BWPD BWPD
2021 40,000 9,349 2,000 11,349
2022 40,000 18,944 2,000 20,944
2023 45,070 27,645 2,254 29,899
2024 77,425 41,703 3,871 45,574
2025 75,194 57,390 3,760 61,150
2026 64,496 66,936 3,225 70,161
2027 49,449 76,128 2,472 78,600
2028 39,596 80,639 1,980 82,619
2029 33,499 77,324 1,675 78,999
2030 28,691 76,754 1,435 78,189
2031 24,177 77,583 1,209 78,792
2032 20,714 72,545 1,036 73,581
2033 18,274 73,971 914 74,885
2034 15,876 74,621 794 75,415
2035 13,604 69,103 680 69,783
2036 11,981 59,667 599 60,266
2037 10,638 57,405 532 57,937
2038 9,190 53,930 460 54,390
2039 7,677 44,057 384 44,441
2040 6,473 39,229 324 39,553
2041 6,045 37,214 302 37,516
2042 5,310 34,028 266 34,294
2043 4,726 29,764 236 30,000
2044 3,968 25,495 198 25,693
2045 2,437 14,185 122 14,307
2046 2,122 12,975 106 13,081
2047 2,019 13,030 101 13,131
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 59 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.6.1 – Disposal Water to Disposal Wells Forecast

11.6.1 Produced Water Treatment Plant Capacity

The capacity estimated for the Produced Water Plant of Haliba Phase II is presented in the
Table 11.6.1.1. The specification of the inlet of Produced Water Treatment Plant is
presented in the Table 11.6.1.2. Refer to Attachment 1 for details.

Table 11.6.1.1 – Haliba Phase II – Produced Water Plant Capacity

Peak Flowrate MBWPD


Produced Water (based on 216 MBOPD
259.4
Case – Year 2028)
Wash Water (5 % v/v of 216 MBOPD Case –
5.7
Year 2028)
Water Plant Capacity 265.1

Table 11.6.1.2 – Specification of Produced Water Treatment Plant Inlet

Parameter Specification
Dispersed Oil in Water 1,000 ppmv (Maximum Excursion)

11.6.2 Disposal Water Specification

The specification of the Disposal water to the disposal wells in presented in the following
Table 11.6.2.1.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 60 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.6.2.1 – Specifications of Disposal Water to Disposal Wells

Parameter Specification
400 ppmv (Normal);
Dispersed Oil in Water
1,000 ppmv (Maximum Excursion)
The water shall be treated to ensure
that corrosion rate in the water
pipeline is within acceptable limit for
H2S
carbon steel material. The
specification to be confirmed during
the course of the study.

Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/l

11.6.3 Produced Water Treatment Technology Approach

In CONSULTANT’s view, for an onshore based facility, the Disposal water treatment to
achieve the required oil content and suspended solids specification to disposal well as
indicated in the Table 11.6.2.1, can be achieved by the following two Options:
• Option 1 – Produced Water Skim Tanks (Settling Tanks)
• Option 2 – Hydrocyclones

The treated water from the Produced Water Treatment shall be transferred to the
Produced Water Disposal Wells using the Produced Water Disposal Pumps.
Downstream of the Produced Water Disposal Pumps, slipstream of produced water
(maximum 50 MBWPD, 25 MBWPD for each pilot PWRI well) will be routed to the
Produced Water Re-injection Pumps to meet the pressure of 2,000 psig (138 barg) at
produced water re-injection pilot wells.

Option 1 - Produced Water Skim Tanks (Setting Tanks)


The Produced Water Skim (Settling) Tank is the simplest form of produced water
treatment equipment. The tanks are normally designed to provide 3 hours residence times
during which coalescence and gravity separation can occur. The tanks are blanketed and
provided with floating oil skimmer or tank weir that can be used for removal of the
separated oil layer.
The PW Skim Tank internals are selected by in-house design models which shall be
supported by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling to optimise the oil/water
separation during detailed engineering.
The Figure 11.6.3.1 presents a simplified scheme for this Option.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 61 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.6.3.1 Option 1 – Produced Water Treatment based on Produced Water Skim Tanks
FG
N2 Flare

Produced Water PW
from PW Header PW Disposal
Skim Pumps PW
To Tanks Disposal
LCV
Skimmed Wells
Oil Vessel

PW
FCV Re-injection
Pilot Wells

PW
Re-injection
Pumps

Advantages
• Competitive capital investment for water treatment technology.
• Capable to handle large oil content in the produced water.
• Design is flexible to handle sludge (flushing system).
• Flexible to handle any remaining gas (dissolved gas) that can potentially damage the
disposal water pumps.
• The internals can be designed to cover a wide range of inlet specifications to
accommodate fluctuating oil, gas, and suspended solids concentrations and can be
installed into existing tanks.
• The tanks can withstand prolonged periods in operation without the need for shutdown
for major maintenance.
• Preferable Option by Operators due to the stability and ease for operation and
maintenance.
• Provides smooth/stable suction to the Disposal Water Pumps.

Disadvantages
• The Produced Water Skim Tanks are not preferable Option if there is layout constraints.
• The tanks need a Vapor Recovery Unit.

Estimated Cost
The Table 11.6.3.2 below presents the differential cost for this Option.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 62 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.6.3.2 – Differential Cost Option 1

Equipment Cost (V) (MUSD)


2 PW Skim Tanks (19 m Diameter x 14.6
3.0
m TT)

Notes:
1. The cost indicted above is EPC.
2. The cost of the Chemicals for control of scale, corrosion, de-foaming and bacterial
growth are not considered as common for Option 1 and 2.
3. The Flare Gas Recovery Ejectors Package is not considered as it’s a MUST for zero
flaring philosophy with or without PW Skim Tanks.

Option 2 – Hydrocyclones
The Hydrocyclones provide the highest throughput-to-size ratio of any water-treating
technology and are insensitive to motion or orientation. For a given capacity of water to be
treated, Hydrocyclones will provide the smallest footprint and size of any water-treating
technology. Deoilers use fluid-pressure energy to create rotational fluid motion. This
rotational motion causes relative movement of materials suspended in the fluid, thus
permitting separation of these materials, one from another or from the fluid. In the case of
produced-water deoiling, this process can remove small oil droplets from the produced
water stream.
The Figure 11.6.3.2 presents a simplified scheme for this Option.

Figure 11.6.3.2 – Option 2 Produced Water Treatment based on Hydrocyclones


Rejects to
Skimmed
Oil Vessel

Produced Water Hydrocyclones


from PW Header
PW
PW Disposal
Transfer Pumps PW
Pumps Disposal
LCV
Wells

PW
FCV Re-injection
Pilot Wells

PW
Re-injection
Pumps
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 63 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Advantages
• Less layout requirements compared to Option 1.
• The Option does not require Vapor Recovery Unit.

Disadvantages
• Higher energy requirements.
• Requires to operate pressurized and generate pressure losses that needs to be
recovered in the produced water pumping system.
• Less capable to handle large oil content compared with the Produced Water Skim
Tanks.
• Design is not flexible to handle sludge and any remaining gas (dissolved gas) that can
potentially damage the disposal water pumps.
• More complex operation compared to Produced Water Skim Tanks.
• Since the produced water is processed with high-velocity motion, cylinder, spit, feed
pipe and other parts are worn out quickly.
• The suction of the Disposal Water pumps is pressurized which is always challenging
during start-up.

Estimated Cost
The following Table 11.6.3.3 presents the differential cost for this Option.

Table 11.6.3.3 – Differential Cost Option 2

Equipment Cost V (MUSD)


2 Hydrocyclones (88.3 MBWPD capacity each) 2.8
PW Transfer Pumps / Power Incremental (200 kW) 0.2
Total 3.0

Interim Recommendation
The two Options proposed are economically comparable; the Option 1 is selected
considering its simplicity, ease for operation and maintenance, its flexibility to handle large
oil content and remove any gases (dissolved gas), and the stability that the Produced
Water Skim Tanks provide to the Produced Water Disposal Pumps system.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 64 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.7 Heat Exchangers Analysis
The proposed CDS Oil Processing train configuration consists of total five (5) heat
exchangers, i.e.: Crude Inlet Heater, Wet Crude Heater, Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat
Exchanger, Stabilizer Reboiler and Stabilized Crude Cooler. The heat integration analysis
and the requirement / optimization of heat exchangers are presented following section.

Figure 11.7.1 – Heat Exchanger Configuration for Haliba CDS / Oil Processing Train
(Option A – Base Case)

HO

Wet Crude
From 1st Heater
Stage
Separator

Crude Inlet Stabilizer


Stabilizer Column
Heater
HO Feed /
Bottom Heat
Exchangers

Stabilized
Crude Cooler
Stabilized Crude
Transfer HO
Crude to
Storage Pumps
Stabilizer
Reboiler

11.7.1 Analysis of an additional Wash Water Heat Exchanger

An incorporation of a Wash Water Heat Exchanger to the base configuration, would intend
to recover the heat of the produced water coming out from 1st Stage Desalter. The
produced water from the 1st Stage Desalter (approximately 150 °F) preheats the make-up
water entering to the 2nd Stage Desalter. The scheme for this analysis is presented in
Figure 11.7.1.1 and key results are presented in Table 11.7.1.1. The analysis is performed
based on ADWEA water arrival temperature of 97.9 °F (Summer) / 67.3 °F (Winter) at
CDS per Pipesim model.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 65 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.7.1.1 – Wash Water Exchanger Scheme integrated to Base Scheme
(Option B)

1st Stage 2nd Stage


Desalter Desalter

To PW
Degassing PDC
Drum LCV

Wash Water
Exchanger
Potable Water Potable
from ADWEA Water
Pipeline System

Table 11.7.1.1 – Operational Parameters


Max Oil & Gas Case
Max Oil & Gas Case (Option B)
(Option A - Base Case)
Parameter Summer Case: Winter Case:
with Wash with Wash
Summer Winter
Water Water
Exchanger Exchanger
Wash Water
- - 0.52 0.99
Exchanger Duty (MW)
Wash Water
Temperature (In/Out) 97.9 / 97.9 67.3 / 67.3 97.9 / 130 67.3 / 130
(°F)
Produced Water
Temperature (In/Out) 149.5 / 149.5 149.2 / 149.2 149.9 / 134 149.9 / 119.4
(°F)
Wet Crude Heater
3.34 6.99 3.36 6.98
Duty (MW)
2nd Stage Desalter
144.3 140.8 147.9 147.9
Inlet Temperature (°F)
Stabilizer
Feed/Bottom Heat
2.50 1.36 2.15 0.68
Exchangers Duty
(MW)
Shell Side
Temperature (In/Out) 202.3 / 184.5 175.3 / 165.4 207.3 / 192.1 175.3 / 170.4
(°F)
Tube Side
Temperature (In/Out) 144.3 / 170 140.8 / 155 147.9 / 170 148 / 155
(°F)

Reboilers Duty (MW) 6.28 3.46 6.89 3.71

Reboiler Temperature 202 175 207 175


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 66 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Max Oil & Gas Case
Max Oil & Gas Case (Option B)
(Option A - Base Case)
Parameter Summer Case: Winter Case:
with Wash with Wash
Summer Winter
Water Water
Exchanger Exchanger
(°F)
Overhead Gas
4.17 3.63 4.27 3.78
Flowrate (MMSCFD)
Crude Inlet Heater
2.90 4.68 2.89 4.67
Duty (MW)
Shell Side
Temperature (In/Out) 184.5 / 163.5 165.4 / 130.4 192.1 / 171.3 170.4 / 135.6
(°F)
Tube Side
Temperature (In/Out) 111.1 / 130 73.4 / 105 111.1 / 130 73.4 / 105
(°F)
Hot Oil System Duty
9.62 10.45 10.25 10.69
(MW)
Stabilized Crude
1.96 - 3.02 -
Cooler (MW)
Stabilized Crude
Cooler Temperature 163.5 / 149 130.5 / 130.5 171.3 / 149 135.6 / 135.6
(In/Out) (°F)
Oil Recovery (%)
98 98 97 97
(Note 1)
RVP (psia) 5.9 9.2 5.9 9.2

Note:
1. Oil recovered at Stabilizer Column.
2. Summer Case: RVP = 6.2 psia when reboiler operates at 202 °F.

Option A – Base Configuration (without Wash Water Exchanger)


Advantages:
• Lower Capital Cost compared to Option B.
• Less power and fuel gas (Hot Oil) requirement.
• Layout requirements are lower than Option B.

Drawbacks:
• Additional 15% surface transfer area for Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger
compared to Option B.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 67 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Option B – Heat Exchanger Configuration with Wash Water Exchanger
Advantages:
• The uses of Wash Water Exchanger (with the duty of 0.5 - 1 MW) increases the crude
temperature by 3 - 7 °F, reduces Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger duty.
• For winter case, the addition of 1 MW Wash Water Exchanger reduces 0.2 MW of the
consumption of hot oil system.

Drawbacks:
• Required higher reboiler duty to meet crude RVP specification for summer case;
increased of Stabilized Crude Cooler duty (by 50%) and increased of gas flow in Gas
Compression System.
• Higher Capital Cost, required additional heat exchanger (Wash Water Exchanger).
• More equipment to maintain.
• Requires relatively higher OPEX (Power/Fuel Gas) than Option A when operating at
technical rate of 216 MBOPD.

Estimated Cost
The following Table 11.7.1.2 provides the Cost Estimation of the Options.

Table 11.7.1.2 – Options Estimated Cost

DIFFERENTIAL OPEX (MUSD) (Versus


CAPEX (MUSD)
Base Configuration) CAPEX +
Option Equipment OPEX
Cost Cost for 30 (MUSD)
Per For 3
Item prorated Years +
Train Trains
per Year Escalation

Wash Water Power Cost Nil Nil


Heat
Exchanger / 0.35 1.05 Maint. HEXs 0.22 6.48
associated
B FG 7.53
facilities Nil Nil
Incremental
Total
Total Capex 1.05 Differential 6.48
OPEX
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 68 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Interim Recommendation
Based on the above analysis, the crude entering Desalter recovers approximately 3 – 7 °F
after injecting the preheated make-up water. The LCC of the heat exchanger and
associated piping and instrumentation is 7.5 MUSD +/- 30% for the three trains (all
inclusive). In Consultant’s view, the heat recovery obtained using the Wash Water Heat
Exchanger is insignificant nor cost effective and introduces a new equipment to operate
and maintain without a significant benefit. Recommend to maintain the design intent as it
is.

11.7.2 Requirement of Hot Oil in Wet Crude Heater

Per the current configuration, the wet crude in the Wet Crude Heater is heat up to 150 °F
using hot oil. This study analyses the possibility of using the heat recovery from Stabilizer
Feed / Bottom Heat Exchangers to replace the use of hot oil. The scheme for this analysis
is presented in Figure 11.7.2.1 and key results are presented in Table 11.7.2.1.

Figure 11.7.2.1 – Wet Crude Heater (without hot oil) Scheme (Option B)

Wet Crude
From 1st Heater
Stage
Separator

Crude Inlet Stabilizer


Stabilizer Column
Heater
Feed /
Bottom Heat
Exchangers

Stabilized
Crude Cooler
Stabilized Crude
Transfer HO
Crude to
Storage Pumps
Stabilizer
Reboiler
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 69 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.7.2.1 – Operational Parameters

Max Oil & Gas Case


Max Oil & Gas Case (Option B)
(Option A - Base Case)

Parameter Summer Case: Winter Case:


without hot oil without hot oil
Summer Winter
in Wet Crude in Wet Crude
Heater Heater
Crude Inlet Heater
2.89 4.68 2.89 4.68
Duty (MW)
Shell Side
Temperature (In/Out) 185 / 164 165 / 130 160 / 139 139 / 102
(°F)
Tube Side
Temperature (In/Out) 111 / 130 73 / 105 111 / 130 73 / 105
(°F)
Wet Crude Heater
3.34 6.99 3.34 6.99
Duty (MW)
Shell Side
Temperature (In/Out) 390 / 257 390 / 257 185 / 160 191 / 139
(°F)
Tube Side
Temperature (In/Out) 128 / 150 103 / 150 128 / 150 103 / 150
(°F)
Reboilers Duty (MW) 6.28 3.93 6.28 7.63
Reboiler Temperature
202 175 202 200
(°F)
Stabilizer Feed/Bottom
Heat Exchangers Duty 2.50 1.36 2.50 1.36
(MW)
Shell Side
Temperature (In/Out) 202 / 185 175 / 165 202 / 185 200 / 191
(°F)
Tube Side
Temperature (In/Out) 144 / 170 141 / 155 144 / 170 141 / 155
(°F)
Hot Oil System Duty
9.62 10.92 6.28 7.63
(MW)
Stabilized Crude
1.96 - - -
Cooler (MW)
Stabilized Crude
Cooler Temperature 164 / 149 131 / 131 139 / 139 102 / 102
(In/Out) (°F)
Oil Recovery (%)
98 98 97 97
(Note 1)
RVP (psia) 5.9 9.2 5.9 6.2
Stabilizer Overhead
Gas Flowrate 4.17 3.63 4.17 4.80
(MMSCFD)
LP Compressor 1st
Stage Flowrate 5.17 4.63 5.17 5.80
(MMSCFD)
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 70 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

Max Oil & Gas Case


Max Oil & Gas Case (Option B)
(Option A - Base Case)

Parameter Summer Case: Winter Case:


without hot oil without hot oil
Summer Winter
in Wet Crude in Wet Crude
Heater Heater
LP Compressor 1st
0.28 0.25 0.28 0.32
Stage Duty (MW)
LP Compressor
2ndStage Flowrate 10.01 9.77 10.00 11.00
(MMSCFD)
LP Compressor 2nd
0.54 0.52 0.54 0.59
Stage Duty (MW)
LP Compressor 3rd
Stage Flowrate 9.84 9.76 9.84 10.97
(MMSCFD)
LP Compressor 3rd
0.53 0.53 0.53 0.59
Stage Duty (MW)
HP Compressor 1st
Stage Flowrate 26.57 25.73 26.57 26.88
(MMSCFD)
HP Compressor 1st
1.21 1.15 1.21 1.20
Stage Duty (MW)
HP Compressor
2ndStage Flowrate 26.52 25.73 26.52 26.88
(MMSCFD)
HP Compressor 2nd
1.17 1.16 1.17 1.20
Stage Duty (MW)

Note:
1. Oil recovered at Stabilizer Column.

Interim Findings and Recommendation

Based on the results presented in Table 11.7.2.1, the proposed configuration helps in
reducing hot oil consumption during Summer case, however during Winter case the
reboiler duty is only 60% of the duty of Wet Crude Heater (inadequate heat transfer). The
Stabilizer bottom operating temperature of Winter case has to be increased from 175 °F to
200 °F in order to heat the wet crude in the Wet Crude Heater up to the target dehydration
temperature (150 °F) and maintain an adequate temperature approach across the Wet
Crude Heater. In addition the following disadvantages can be highlighted:

• Poor / Nil heat recovery at the Crude inlet heater with detriment of the oil – water
separation in the 2nd Stage Separator which shall be compensated with additional
demulsifier injection. In Consultant’s experience and considering the expected high
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 71 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
water cut at the inlet of the CDS, design intent shall provide adequate pre-heating
stage before 2nd Stage Separator which minimizes the malfunction of the Desalters
due to excessive water carryover from the 2nd Stage Separator.

• Increment the oil losses by 0.5 % versus the base case, which represents around 0.4
MM barrels of oil per year (based on 216 MBOPD), approximately 10-15 MUSD per
year (30-40 USD per barrel).

• Over spec the RVP of the Stabilized crude from 10 psia to 6.2 psia.

It is recommended to maintain the design as base case operating the Wet Crude Heater
with hot oil.

11.7.3 Removal of Stabilized Crude Cooler

Based on the current CDS Oil Processing Train configuration, the intent of the Stabilized
Crude Cooler is to cool the stabilized crude coming from the Crude Inlet Heater from 164
°F to 149 °F during summer season to maintain the liquid phase at the FSTs (maximum
recovery). This cooler is bypassed during winter season. The proposed removal of
Stabilized Crude Cooler is studied and analysed in this section. The scheme for this
analysis is presented in Figure 11.7.3.1.

Figure 11.7.3.1 – Stabilized Crude Cooler Scheme (Option B)

HO

Wet Crude
From 1st Heater
Stage
Separator

Crude Inlet Stabilizer


Stabilizer Column
Heater
HO Feed /
Bottom Heat
Exchangers

Stabilized Crude
Crude to Transfer HO
Storage Pumps
Stabilizer
Reboiler
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 72 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Per current configuration (Base Case – Figure 11.7.1), the design case for Crude Inlet
Heater is Winter Case which requires 2 shells in series (working) and 2 shells in series
(standby / dirty service).
The proposal of removal of Stabilized Crude Cooler is analysed and presented in Table
11.7.3.1. The Option B - Case 1 is modelled with increases of wet crude outlet
temperature at the Crude Inlet Heater to 145 °F (stabilized crude is 185 °F from Stabilizer
Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger) in order to obtain the stabilized crude outlet temperature of
149 °F during summer season. For this configuration, the Crude Inlet Heater requires 3
shells in series. The HRTI schematic for this case is presented in Figure 11.7.3.2.
The Option B - Case 2 is modelled considering the failure (or bypass) one of the Stabilizer
Feed/Bottom Heat Exchangers (total of 2 heat exchangers in parallel) which leads to
higher temperature (187 °F) of stabilized crude enters the Crude Inlet Heater. This
scenario is evaluated as the Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger is not provided with
standby unit (due to clean service) and it is presented in Table 11.7.3.1. The Crude Inlet
Heater is found requires 3 shells in series for this scenario. The HRTI schematic for this
case is presented in Figure 11.7.3.3.

Table 11.7.3.1 – Crude Inlet Heater Parameter

Max Oil & Gas Case Max Oil & Gas Case
(Option A -Base Case) (Option B) - Summer
Case 1: Normal Case 2: Failure
Operation of of one
Parameter Stabilizer Feed Stabilizer Feed
/ Bottom Heat / Bottom Heat
Summer Winter
Exchanger and Exchanger and
without without
Stabilized Stabilized
Crude Cooler Crude Cooler
Crude Inlet Heater Duty
2.89 4.68 5.26 5.39
(MW)
Shell Side Temperature
(In/Out) (°F) (Stabilized 185 / 164 165 / 130 185 / 146 187 / 147
Crude)
Tube Side Temperature
(In/Out) (°F) (Wet 111 / 130 73 / 105 111 / 145 111 / 146
Crude)
2 Working + 2 Working + 3 Working + 3 Working +
No. of Shell
2 Standby 2 Standby 3 Standby 3 Standby
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 73 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.7.3.2 – HTRI Schematic for Option B - Case 1

Figure 11.7.3.3 – HTRI Schematic for Option B - Case 2

Based on Table 11.7.3.2, the total hot oil system duty is reduced by 10 - 20% during
summer season due to the reduced duty of Wet Crude Heater. Although the total hot oil
consumption is reduced by 10 - 20% during summer season, the overall capacity of hot oil
system is designed for the winter case to provide adequate heating.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 74 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.7.3.2 – Operational Parameters
Max Oil & Gas Case Max Oil & Gas Case
(Option A - Base Case) (Option B) - Summer
Case 1: Normal Case 2: Failure
Operation of of one
Parameter Stabilizer Feed Stabilizer Feed
/ Bottom Heat / Bottom Heat
Summer Winter
Exchanger and Exchanger and
without without
Stabilized Stabilized
Crude Cooler Crude Cooler
Wet Crude Heater Duty
3.34 6.99 1.20 1.02
(MW)
Shell Side Temperature
390 / 257 390 / 257 390 / 257 390 / 257
(In/Out) (°F)
Tube Side Temperature
128 / 150 103 / 150 142 / 150 143 / 150
(In/Out) (°F)
Reboilers Duty (MW) 6.28 3.93 6.18 6.28
Reboiler Temperature
202 175 202 195
(°F)
Stabilizer Feed/Bottom
Heat Exchangers Duty 2.50 1.36 2.49 1.25
(MW)
Shell Side Temperature
202 / 185 175 / 165 202 / 185 195 / 187
(In/Out) (°F)
Tube Side Temperature
144 / 170 141 / 155 144 / 170 144 / 157
(In/Out) (°F)
Hot Oil System Duty
9.62 10.92 7.38 7.30
(MW)
Stabilized Crude Cooler
1.96 - - -
(MW)
Stabilized Crude Cooler
Temperature (In/Out) 164 / 149 131 / 131 146 / 146 147 / 147
(°F)
Oil Recovery (%)
98% 98% 98% 98%
(Note 1)
RVP (psia) 5.9 9.2 5.9 6.8

Notes:
1. Oil recovered at Stabilizer Column.

Option Advantages and Drawbacks


Option A – Heat Exchanger Configuration with Stabilized Crude Cooler (Base Case)
Advantages:
• Proven, well known, robust design.
• Lower Capital Cost compared to Option B.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 75 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

• Provides a safeguard to maintain the crude export temperature at maximum 149 °F


which ensures none / minimum flash gas at the FSTs maximizing the oil recovery.

Drawbacks:
• Requires relatively higher OPEX (Power/Fuel Gas) than Option B when operating
at technical rate of 216 MBOPD. This disadvantage is negligible if operating in the
range of 80-120 MBOPD (realistic).

Option B – Heat Exchanger Configuration without Stabilized Crude Cooler


Advantages:
• Less power and fuel gas (Hot Oil) requirement.
• Layout requirements are lower than Option A.

Drawbacks:
• Higher Capital Cost, required 3 shells in series (working) + 3 shells in series
(standby) (additional 2 shells) for Crude Inlet Heater and standby is required for
Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger (additional 1 shell in parallel in order to
meet the RVP specification).
• More units to maintain (additional 9 Shells in total).
• No saving in capital investment for hot oil system as the system is designed based
on the winter operation which is similar for Option A and B.

Options Cost Estimated


The Table 11.7.3.3 presents the estimated cost of the Options.

Table 11.7.3.3 – Options Estimated Costs

CAPEX
DIFFERENTIAL OPEX (MUSD) CAPEX
(MUSD)
+
Option Equipment
Cost Cost for OPEX
Per For 3 (MUSD)
Item prorated 30 Years +
Train Trains
per Year Escalation
Power Cost (Fans)
0.02 0.81
(Note 1)
Stabilized
Maintenance Cost
A Crude Cooler 0.35 1.05 0.01 0.18 3.22
HEXs (Note 3)
(1 per Train)
FG Incremental (Note
0.03 1.18
2)
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 76 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013

CAPEX
DIFFERENTIAL OPEX (MUSD) CAPEX
(MUSD)
+
Option Equipment
Cost Cost for OPEX
Per For 3 (MUSD)
Item prorated 30 Years +
Train Trains
per Year Escalation

Total CAPEX 1.05 Total Differential OPEX 2.17


Crude Inlet
Heater -
Maintenance Cost
Additional 2 0.5 1.5 0.01 0.36
HEXs (Note 3)
Shells / per
Train
Stabilizer
B Feed/Bottom 2.94
Heat Maintenance Cost
0.3 0.9 0.01 0.18
Exchanger - HEXs (Note 3)
1 Shell per
Train
Total CAPEX 2.4 Total Differential OPEX 0.54

Notes:
1. Power Cost, 0.21 AED/kW-h.
2. Fuel Gas Cost, 1.8 USD /1,000 SCF.
3. Heat Exchanger Maintenance Costs; 5-10 kUSD every 5 years.
4. Cost Escalation, 20% within 30 years.

Interim Findings and Recommendation


Both Options are technically feasible and comparable (± 10%) in terms of life cycle cost in
the long run (plateau production). The Option A (Base Case) remains cost-effective and
provides the great flexibility of being a layer of protection to maintain the crude at a stable
temperature (below 149 °F) which guarantee the overall recovery of the plant.
In Consultant’s experience, the Crude Inlet Heater requires shutdown for maintenance
every 18-24 months (dirty service), i.e.: 2-3 maintenance cycles before overall plant
maintenance. This means that the scenario of failure of one set of these HEXs while
performing a maintenance to the other set of HEXs is credible. In this event, the Stabilized
Crude Cooler is the only safeguard / layer of protection that the design provides to meet
the export temperature / minimize the flash gas from the FSTs, maintain the oil recovery.
This is the rationale and basis adopted by Opcos like ExxonMobil, Aramco as best
practices for CDS when allocating fan coolers in the run-down crude line to export.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 77 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.7.4 Flow Distribution to Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger

Based on the current CDS configuration, the Stabilizer Column is provided with Stabilizer
Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger to optimize the energy / heating requirement to achieve the
product specification (RVP). The intent of the Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger is to
preheat 70% of the desalted crude via the heat exchanger to 170 °F (Summer) / 155 °F
(Winter) before entering the Stabilizer Column whilst the remaining 30% flows directly
enter to the top of the column. The proposal of preheating complete desalted crude
(100%) from 2nd Stage Desalter via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger is studied and
analysed in this section. The scheme for this analysis is presented in Figure 11.7.4.1.

Figure 11.7.4.1 – Full Flow to Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger Scheme (Option B)

HO

Wet Crude
From 1st Heater
Stage
Separator Stabilizer
Stabilizer
Crude Inlet Feed /
Column
Heater Bottom Heat
HO Exchangers

Crude
Stabilized
Transfer
Crude Cooler
Pumps
Stabilized HO
Crude to
Storage Stabilizer
Reboiler
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 78 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.7.4.1 – Operational Parameters
Max Oil & Gas Case
Max Oil & Gas Case (Option B)
(Option A - Base Case)
Summer Case: Winter Case:
Parameter 100% crude to 100% crude to
Summer Winter Feed/Bottom Feed/Bottom
Heat Heat
Exchangers Exchangers
Reboilers Duty (MW) 6.28 3.93 11.32 3.50
Reboiler
202 175 242 175
Temperature (°F)
Overhead Gas
4.17 3.63 4.80 3.96
Flowrate (MMSCFD)
Stabilizer
Feed/Bottom Heat
2.50 1.36 4.05 1.92
Exchangers Duty
(MW)
Crude Inlet Heater
2.89 4.67 2.90 4.67
Duty (MW)
Stabilized Crude
1.96 - 6.70 -
Cooler (MW)
Oil Recovery (%)
98 98 97 97
(Note 1)
RVP (psia) 5.9 9.2 6.0 9.1

Notes:
1. Oil recovered at Stabilizer Column.
2. Summer Case (Option B): RVP = 7.9 psia when reboiler operates at 202 °F (5.4 MW);
light ends are not removed from the crude to the gas phase, hence, affecting the RVP.

The Figure 11.7.4.2 to 11.7.4.5 present the column profile when operates with 70% or
100% flowrate via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger for both Summer and Winter
cases.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 79 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.7.4.2 – Column Operating Temperature (Summer Case)

Figure 11.7.4.3 – Column Gas Flowrate (Summer Case)


AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 80 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.7.4.4 – Column Operating Temperature (Winter Case)

Figure 11.7.4.5 – Column Gas Flowrate (Winter Case)

Option Advantages and Drawbacks


Option A – Preheating 70% desalted crude via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat
Exchanger (Base Case)
Advantages:
• Proven, well known, cost-effective, optimum design.
• Significantly lower energy consumption at Reboiler, Hot Oil System, Fuel Gas
System, Colum size compared to Option B.
• Smaller footprint compared to Option B.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 81 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Drawbacks:
• Slightly higher energy demand during winter season than Option B.

Option B – Preheating 100% desalted crude via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat


Exchanger
Advantages:
• Slightly less energy consumption during winter season.

Drawbacks:
• Based on the Figures 11.7.4.2 and 11.7.4.3, this option requires far more energy
than Option B when operating at technical rate of 216 MBOPD on yearly basis. The
100% flow through Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger resulted inadequate
liquid/gas distribution in the column and therefore promote the light ends to flow
down the column (light ends not removed from the crude to gas phase), hence,
requires higher reboiler duty (i.e. higher hot oil consumption) to meet the required
RVP.
• The installed capacity of the Stabilizer Reboiler is double (11.3 MW) versus the
original configuration (6.3 MW).
• Stabilized Crude Cooler duty increases by more than three times with respect to
the base case configuration.
• The low pressure gas increases by ca. 15% compared to Option A.
• Not cost-effective compared to base case.
• Larger footprint.

Interim Findings and Recommendation


Based on the results presented in Table 11.7.4.1, the proposal of preheating 100% of the
desalted crude via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger is by far more energy
inefficient and requires a larger equipment to achieve the stabilization specification. The
preheating of the 100% of the desalted crude is not a practice in the industry as causes a
spike of the temperature profile in the column promoting flooding, weeping, foaming, etc.

Consultant recommends to maintain the original configuration (Option A) as energy


efficient, provides adequate fluid distribution across the Stabilizer Column and it’s a proven
and well known and cost-effective design.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 82 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
11.8 Pilot Wells

As part of Haliba Phase II Project, facilities shall be provided to conduct Enhanced Oil
Recovery (EOR) field pilot tests initiatives using the following methods: a) Produced Water
Re-injection; and b) Water Alternating Gas Injection (WAG).

11.8.1 Produced Water Re-injection (PWRI) Pilot Test Scheme

Two wells, located in Haliba Area shall be dedicated for this test. The key process
conditions at the well’s injection point are 25 MBWPD at 2,000 psig (138 barg). Two (2) x
100 % Produced Water Re-injection Pump with 50 MBWPD capacity shall be provided at
Haliba CDS. These pumps take suction (slipstream) from the produced water disposal
pumps main discharge line and route the produced water via 12” surface header to the two
pilot wells as presented in the Figure 11.8.2.1.

11.8.2 Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Injection Pilot Test Scheme

Two single completion wells, located in Haliba Area shall be dedicated for this test. The
key process conditions at the well’s injection point are 5 MMSCFD at 4,000 (275.9 barg).
One (1) x 100 % Gas Injection Compressor; 10 MMSCFD capacity shall be provided at
Haliba CDS. The Gas Injection Compressor package takes suction (slipstream) from the
common dehydrated gas header coming from the TEG Units to gas export pipeline. The
Gas Injection Compressor package consist of three stages of compression provided with
its own Suction Knock Out rum, After cooler (Air cooler - forced draft type) and Discharge
Knock Out Drum and associated piping and instrumentation. The discharge pressure of
the Gas Injection Compression Package is set at 4,200 psig meet the required pressure at
the WAG injection point. The gas is routed from Haliba CDS to the pilot wells using a 4”
surface header to the two pilot wells as presented in Figure 11.8.2.1. The water injection
shall be provided from water supply wells at the nearest location from the WAG wells.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 83 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Figure 11.8.2.1 – Pilot Test Facilities

Gas Injection Compressor Package Configuration


The proposed Gas Injection Compressor configuration shall meet the compressor discharge
temperature limit specified in Table 11.3.2.1.

Option 1 – Provide two stages of Gas Injection Compression (Initial Approach)


The compression scheme for this Option is presented in Figure 11.8.2.2 and Operational
Parameters are presented in Table 11.8.2.1.

Figure 11.8.2.2 – Two stage Gas Injection Compression Scheme


To WAG
Wells

From TEG
Dehydration
Packages
Gas Injection
Gas Injection Gas Injection Gas Injection
Comp. 2nd Gas Injection
Comp. 1st Gas Injection Comp. Inter Comp. Gas Injection Comp. 2nd
Stage After
Stage Suction Comp. 1st Cooler Interstage Comp. 2nd Stage
Cooler
KOD Stage KOD Stage Discharge
KOD
To 1st Stage To 1st Stage To 1st Stage
Separator Separator Separator
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 84 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.8.2.1 - Operational Parameters - Summer

Gas Injection Compressor-1 Gas Injection Compressor-2


Parameter
Suction Discharge Suction Discharge
Pressure (psig) 432.0 1365.0 1354.0 4211.0

Temperature (°F) 146.0 298.3 148.9 284.4

Compression Ratio 3.1 3.1

Flowrate (MMSCFD) 10.0 10.0

Discussion
According to the distribution of flowrates and pressure, a preliminary selection of the
Compressor type is inclined for the use of Positive Displacement type (Reciprocating /
Screw).
Based on the results presented in Table 11.8.2.1, it is observed that the discharge
pressure of 1st stage exceeds the limit whilst 2nd stage at the limit established for Positive
Displacement type of Compressors, i.e. 285 °F.
In order to address the high discharge temperature issue, one more stage of Compression
is added; Refer Option 2.

Option 2 – Provide three stages of Gas Injection Compression


The compression scheme for this Option is presented in Figure 11.8.2.3 and Operational
Parameters are presented in Table 11.8.2.2.

Figure 11.8.2.3 – Three stage Gas Injection Compression Scheme


To WAG
Wells

From TEG
Dehydration
Packages
Gas Injection Gas Injection Gas Injection
Gas Injection Comp. 1st Gas Injection Comp. 2nd Gas Injection Comp. 3rd
1st & Gas Injection
Comp. 1st Gas Injection Stage After Comp. Gas Injection Stage After
Comp. 2nd & Gas Injection Stage
2nd Interstage Comp. 3rd
Stage Suction Comp. 1st Cooler Comp. 2nd Cooler 3rd Interstage Comp. 3rd Aftercooler
KOD KOD Stage
Stage Stage Stage
KOD Discharge
KOD
To 1st Stage To 1st Stage To 1st Stage To 1st Stage
Separator Separator Separator Separator
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 85 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
Table 11.8.2.2 - Operational Parameters - Summer
Gas Injection Gas Injection Gas Injection
Compressor-1 Compressor-2 Compressor-3
Parameter
Suction Discharge Suction Discharge Suction Discharge

Pressure (psig) 432.0 935.5 924.5 1983.0 1972.0 4211.0

Temperature (°F) 145.8 246.4 169.9 274.6 170.0 252.5

Compression Ratio 2.1 2.1 2.1

Flowrate (MMSCFD) 10.0 10.0 10.0

Discussion
According to the distribution of flowrates and pressure, a preliminary selection of the
Compressor type is inclined for the use of Positive Displacement type (Reciprocating /
Screw).
Based on the results presented in Table 11.8.2.2, the compression ratio, pressure and
temperature profiles are acceptable.
The compression ratio, pressure and temperature profiles for the low and high pressure
sections are acceptable.

Interim Recommendation
The Gas Injection Compression shall be designed based on the configuration of Option 2
(three stages of compression) to maintain the compression system operates within the
compressor discharge temperature limits.

12.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


12.1 Crude Stabilization
The Option 1 based on the use of a Stabilizer column (with reboilers and Feed/Bottom Heat
Exchangers) with Compressor System (LP/HP) and TEG based GDU allocated to achieve
the required RVP and H2S specification is selected due to its conventional and proven
system, highest oil recovery among the Options, and highest capability to achieve deep
stabilization and absorb composition changes. This configuration is slightly higher in capital
investment and operational cost compared with Option 3, however presents an oil recovery
2% above the LP Separator Option.
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 86 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
12.2 Gas Compression System
Continue the design development with the configuration presented in Option based on three
stages of LP Gas Compression and two stages of HP Gas Compression, maintaining in
perspective the potential optimization of one stage compression of the LP system provided
this is technically acceptable and competitive from a life cycle cost point of view.

12.3 Analysis of Gas Dehydration Unit (TEG Dehydration Unit) Location


The TEG Units shall be located downstream of 2nd Stage HP Compression to maintain the
modular approach for TEG Units, cost effective, easy to operate / maintain and layout
friendly.

12.4 HC Condensate Handling at ASAB


The study found the maximum HC Condensate flowrate arriving ASAB is 17 - 22 m3/h on the
basis of exporting 75 MMSCFD of dry gas from Haliba CDS. The Option of tie-in the HC
condensate collected from Slug Catcher and Inline Filter Separator to Crude Heater inlet
manifold is selected.

12.5 Water Management


The Option based on the use of Produced Water Skim Tanks is selected as competitive
economically and considering its simplicity, ease for operation and maintenance, its
flexibility to handle large oil content and remove any gases (dissolved gas), and the stability
that the Produced Water Skim Tanks provide to the Produced Water Disposal Pumps
system.

12.6 Heat Exchangers Analysis


The following recommendations arise from the analysis of various initiatives regarding the
configuration of the Heat Exchangers across the CDS:

Incorporate a Wash Water Heat Exchanger to Desalting System

The proposed Wash Water Heat Exchanger recovers approximately 3 - 7 °F of the wet
crude temperature with the LCC of the heat exchanger and associated piping and
instrumentation of 7.5 MUSD +/- 30% for the three trains (all inclusive). In Consultant’s view,
the heat recovery obtained using the Wash Water Heat Exchanger is insignificant nor cost
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 87 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
effective and introduces a new equipment to operate and maintain without a significant
benefit.

It’s recommended to maintain the design intent as it is without the Wash Water Heat
Exchanger.

Operating the Wet Crude Heater with stabilized crude instead of hot oil

The proposed scheme presents the following limitations:

• Poor / nil heat recovery at the Crude inlet heater with detriment of the oil – water
separation in the 2nd Stage Separator which shall be compensated with additional
demulsifier injection. In Consultant’s experience and considering the expected high
water cut at the inlet of the CDS, design intent shall provide adequate pre-heating
stage before 2nd Stage Separator which minimizes the malfunction of the Desalters
due to excessive water carryover from the 2nd Stage Separator.

• Increment the oil losses by 0.5 % versus the base case, which represents around 0.4
MM barrels of oil per year (based on 216 MBOPD), approximately 10-15 MUSD per
year (30-40 USD per barrel).

• Over spec the RVP of the Stabilized crude from 10 psia to 6.2 psia.

• Increment the tendency of fouling of the Reboilers operating at higher temperature.

It is recommended to maintain the design as the base case operating the Wet Crude
Heater with hot oil.

Removal of Stabilized Crude Cooler


The use of Stabilized Crude Cooler remains cost-effective and provides the great flexibility
of being a layer of protection to maintain the crude at a stable temperature (below 149 °F)
which guarantee the overall recovery of the plant.

It is recommended to maintain the design as the base case operating the Stabilized Crude
Cooler.

Flow Distribution to Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat Exchanger


The proposal of preheating 100% of the desalted crude via Stabilizer Feed/Bottom Heat
Exchanger is by far more energy inefficient and requires a larger equipment to achieve the
AL DHAFRA PETROLEUM OPERATIONS COMPANY LTD.

PROCESS SELECTION REPORT

Project Title: FEED FOR HALIBA PHASE II PROJECT Date: 24/10/2020 Page 88 of 88
COMPANY Doc. No.: 60-01-11-2617 Rev. 00 Consultant Doc. No.: 614049-0000-49ER-0013
stabilization specification. The preheating of the 100% of the desalted crude is not a
practice in the industry as causes a spike of the temperature profile in the column
promoting flooding, weeping, foaming, etc.

Consultant recommends to maintain the original configuration (preheat 70% desalted


crude) as energy efficient, provides adequate fluid distribution across the Stabilizer
Column and it’s a proven and well known and cost-effective design.

12.7 Gas Injection Compression


The option of three stages of compression is selected for the Gas Injection Compression to
maintain the compression system operates within the compressor discharge temperature
limits.

13.0 HOLD LIST


1. Deleted.
2. Deleted.

14.0 ATTACHMENTS
1. Production Profile for 80 / 120 / 180 MBOPD (Yearly Sustainable Rates).
2. Technical Query 60-99-11-0510 Response.
3. Production Profile – Zone Wise.
ATTACHMENT 1
Production Profile - 60 / 80 / 120 / 180 MBOPD (Yearly Sustainable Rates)

80 MBOPD 60 MBOPD 120 MBOPD 180 MBOPD

Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field


Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field Total Field
Year Produced Year Produced Year Produced Year Produced
Oil Gas Liquid Oil Gas Liquid Oil Gas Liquid Oil Gas Liquid
Water Water Water Water

2019 20239 6.7 1031 21270 2019 15684 5.2 799 16483 2019 31368 10.4 1597 32966 2019 47053 15.6 2396 49449

2020 38536 12.6 4662 43197 2020 29863 9.8 3612 33476 2020 59726 19.5 7225 66951 2020 89589 29.3 10837 100427

2021 40000 13.1 9349 49349 2021 30998 10.2 7245 38243 2021 61996 20.3 14490 76485 2021 92993 30.5 21734 114728

2022 40000 12.9 18944 58943 2022 30998 10.0 14680 45678 2022 61995 20.0 29360 91356 2022 92993 30.0 44040 137034

2023 45070 14.1 27645 72716 2023 34927 10.9 21424 56351 2023 69854 21.9 42847 112701 2023 104781 32.8 64271 169052

2024 77425 26.9 41703 119128 2024 60000 20.8 32317 92317 2024 120000 41.7 64634 184634 2024 180000 62.5 96951 276951

2025 75194 26.6 57390 132584 2025 58271 20.6 44474 102745 2025 116542 41.2 88949 205491 2025 174813 61.8 133423 308236

2026 64496 23.3 66936 131432 2026 49981 18.1 51871 101852 2026 99961 36.1 103743 203704 2026 149942 54.2 155614 305557

2027 49449 17.5 76128 125577 2027 38320 13.6 58995 97315 2027 76641 27.1 117990 194630 2027 114961 40.7 176984 291945

2028 39596 13.7 80639 120235 2028 30684 10.6 62491 93175 2028 61369 21.2 124982 186351 2028 92053 31.9 187473 279526

2029 33499 11.7 77324 110823 2029 25960 9.1 59922 85882 2029 51919 18.1 119844 171763 2029 77879 27.2 179766 257645

2030 28691 10.0 76754 105445 2030 22234 7.7 59480 81714 2030 44469 15.5 118960 163428 2030 66703 23.2 178439 245142

2031 24177 8.4 77583 101760 2031 18736 6.5 60122 78858 2031 37472 13.0 120245 157717 2031 56208 19.5 180367 236575

2032 20714 7.1 72545 93259 2032 16052 5.5 56218 72271 2032 32104 11.0 112437 144541 2032 48157 16.5 168655 216812

2033 18274 6.3 73971 92244 2033 14161 4.9 57323 71484 2033 28322 9.8 114646 142968 2033 42483 14.6 171970 214452

2034 15876 5.4 74621 90498 2034 12303 4.2 57827 70131 2034 24607 8.4 115655 140261 2034 36910 12.6 173482 210392

2035 13604 4.7 69103 82706 2035 10542 3.6 53551 64093 2035 21084 7.3 107101 128185 2035 31626 10.9 160652 192278

2036 11981 4.1 59667 71648 2036 9285 3.2 46238 55523 2036 18570 6.4 92477 111046 2036 27855 9.5 138715 166570

2037 10638 3.6 57405 68043 2037 8244 2.8 44486 52730 2037 16487 5.6 88972 105459 2037 24731 8.4 133458 158189

2038 9190 3.2 53930 63120 2038 7122 2.5 41792 48914 2038 14244 5.0 83585 97828 2038 21365 7.4 125377 146742

2039 7677 2.6 44057 51734 2039 5950 2.0 34142 40091 2039 11899 4.0 68283 80182 2039 17849 6.0 102425 120274

2040 6473 2.2 39229 45702 2040 5016 1.7 30400 35417 2040 10032 3.4 60801 70833 2040 15048 5.1 91201 106250

2041 6045 2.0 37214 43258 2041 4684 1.5 28838 33523 2041 9369 3.1 57677 67046 2041 14053 4.6 86515 100568

2042 5310 1.8 34028 39338 2042 4115 1.4 26370 30485 2042 8230 2.8 52740 60969 2042 12344 4.2 79110 91454

2043 4726 1.6 29764 34490 2043 3663 1.2 23065 26728 2043 7326 2.5 46130 53456 2043 10988 3.7 69195 80183

2044 3968 1.3 25495 29464 2044 3075 1.0 19757 22833 2044 6151 2.0 39515 45665 2044 9226 3.0 59272 68498

2045 2437 0.8 14185 16623 2045 1889 0.6 10993 12882 2045 3778 1.2 21986 25763 2045 5666 1.9 32978 38645

2046 2122 0.7 12975 15097 2046 1645 0.5 10055 11699 2046 3290 1.1 20109 23399 2046 4934 1.6 30164 35098

2047 2019 0.7 13030 15048 2047 1564 0.5 10097 11662 2047 3129 1.1 20194 23323 2047 4693 1.6 30291 34985

2048 0 0.0 0 0 2048 0 0.0 0 0 2048 0 0.0 0 0 2048 0 0.0 0 0

2049 0 0.0 0 0 2049 0 0.0 0 0 2049 0 0.0 0 0 2049 0 0.0 0 0

2050 0 0.0 0 0 2050 0 0.0 0 0 2050 0 0.0 0 0 2050 0 0.0 0 0

2051 0 0.0 0 0 2051 0 0.0 0 0 2051 0 0.0 0 0 2051 0 0.0 0 0

Objective: Determining the sustainable max rates for oil and water for the CDS of EPC-2 Haliba which should be robust considering the uncertainties in the water-cut behaviour

Observation:

The following peak rates have been identified from the forecast at CDS as in the BoD of EPC2 (For 80 MBOPD Production Profile)

Oil Rate Water Rate Liquid Rate


Criteria Occurs in
(bpd) (bpd) (bpd)
Max
2025 75194 57390 132584
Liquid

Max Oil 2024 77425 41703 119128

Max
2028 39596 80639 120235
Water
Minimum
39596 41703 119128
of All
Maximum
of All for 77425 80639 132584
Oil and
Max.
132584-39596
Produced
= 92989
Water

Inferences:

The capacities of each separator train = 60000 BOPD

The maximum oil handling capacity = 77425 BOPD – Based on the maximum oil rate under different conditions of maximum oil rate, maximum water rate and maximum liquid rate.

Moreover the CDS capacity for two given trains in EPC2 totals to around 120000 BOPD, which is sufficiently above the maximum of the forecast in CDS.

The dominant field, Haliba will be water-flooded and thus the water handling should remain robust, meaning that the water handling capacity should not constraint the system.

Thus the difference between the maximum liquid rate amongst all cases (132584 BLPD) and the minimum oil rate (39596 BOPD) amongst all cases corresponding to maximum water rate as per the

profile/year is suggested to be water handling capacity.

i.e. Sustainable Water Capacity to be considered for FEED Design corresponding to 80 MBOPD Scenario = 132584 - 39596 = 92986 BWPD

Sustainable Water Capacity for 120 MBOPD and 180 MBOPD shall be estimated in the same methodology as explained above.

This approach mitigates the uncertainty in the timing of the peaks rates and the behavior of water production.

Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 3

Zone Wise Production Profile - Haliba Mainbody / Haliba North / Haliba South

Main Main North North


Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate

Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI


Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 7387314.0 376154.6 2451799.4 9476351.9 20239 1031 6717 25963 2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2020 21452896.0 2077629.4 7064846.2 27184578.0 38536 4662 12638 48516 2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2021 36052930.0 5489934.0 11862198.5 47783232.0 40000 9349 13143 56435 2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2022 50652918.0 12404322.3 16574461.0 70360155.0 40000 18944 12910 61855 2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2023 67103613.8 22494859.6 21726267.0 96490599.0 45070 27645 14115 71590 2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2024 86324457.6 37482632.9 27818762.7 126055120.0 52660 41062 16692 80999 2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 740340.8 0 0 0 2028
2025 101293833.0 55387808.5 32599984.5 155860110.0 41012 49055 13099 81658 2025 989603.2 348122.1 335265.3 1680595.0 2711 954 919 2576
2026 113617584.0 72407756.8 36555397.6 185199880.0 33764 46630 10837 80383 2026 1921603.7 2362836.0 650989.6 2792342.0 2553 5520 865 3046
2027 123573894.0 90117835.8 39749140.2 213382390.0 27278 48521 8750 77212 2027 2609867.2 4583249.0 884120.1 3960342.0 1886 6083 639 3200
2028 131737859.0 108359004.7 42362658.7 240465070.0 22367 49976 7160 74199 2028 3218459.0 6870010.0 1090274.2 5131542.0 1667 6265 565 3209
2029 138531896.0 124742737.9 44534622.0 266473740.0 18614 44887 5951 71257 2029 3771360.0 9180664.0 1277573.6 6299542.0 1515 6331 513 3200
2030 144309609.0 140368199.2 46380844.1 291758400.0 15829 42809 5058 69273 2030 4284562.0 11517608.0 1451441.5 7467541.0 1406 6403 476 3200
2031 149026517.0 156128358.1 47885172.7 316122130.0 12923 43179 4121 66750 2031 4769395.0 13890855.0 1615716.5 8630835.0 1328 6502 450 3187
2032 153022854.0 170595273.6 49161564.3 338300240.0 10949 39635 3497 60762 2032 5162205.0 16087417.0 1748765.1 9687172.0 1076 6018 365 2894
2033 156548150.0 185482681.0 50292226.5 360127820.0 9658 40787 3098 59802 2033 5489624.0 18180176.0 1859632.5 10661060.0 897 5734 304 2668
2034 159622414.0 200711623.0 51279878.6 381575480.0 8423 41723 2706 58761 2034 5765840.0 20159154.0 1953132.3 11500610.0 757 5422 256 2300
2035 162265452.0 215913206.0 52128874.0 402534300.0 7241 41648 2326 57421 2035 5972755.0 21910481.0 2023114.0 12133760.0 567 4798 192 1735
2036 164555655.0 229369672.0 52865473.0 422137990.0 6275 36867 2018 53709 2036 6170643.0 23670421.0 2090052.0 12692670.0 542 4822 183 1531
2037 166565216.0 242193014.0 53510374.0 440788780.0 5506 35132 1767 51098 2037 6333866.0 25314554.0 2145233.7 13166550.0 447 4504 151 1298
2038 168281020.0 254158981.0 54061606.0 458039030.0 4701 32783 1510 47261 2038 6426478.0 26681934.0 2176444.1 13523990.0 254 3746 86 979
2039 169711380.0 263659639.0 54523895.0 472290770.0 3919 26029 1267 39046 2039 6513972.0 28054444.0 2205929.4 13806620.0 240 3760 81 774
2040 170957542.0 272003893.0 54927816.0 484918370.0 3414 22861 1107 34596 2040 6596986.0 29435434.0 2233905.0 14001120.0 227 3784 77 533
2041 172123077.0 279625251.0 55305487.0 496687810.0 3193 20880 1035 32245 2041 6675420.0 30816994.0 2260337.5 14185510.0 215 3785 72 505
2042 173179531.0 286264431.0 55648629.0 507169740.0 2894 18190 940 28718 2042 6750021.0 32202394.0 2285477.9 14347410.0 204 3796 69 444
2043 174124781.0 292269700.0 55957822.0 516778110.0 2590 16453 847 26324 2043 6815804.0 33479094.0 2307646.8 14506970.0 180 3498 61 437
2044 174982054.0 298260892.0 56238021.0 524760990.0 2349 16414 768 21871 2044 6815804.0 33479094.0 2307646.8 14640040.0 0 0 0
2045 175512292.0 301573699.0 56410923.0 529881210.0 1453 9076 474 14028 2045 6815804.0 33479094.0 2307646.8 14715730.0 0 0 0
2046 175941443.0 304434008.0 56550336.0 534545680.0 1176 7836 382 12779 2046 6815804.0 33479094.0 2307646.8 14779990.0 0 0 0
2047 176345534.0 307309310.0 56681520.0 539196400.0 1107 7878 359 12742 2047 6815804.0 33479094.0 2307646.8 14845760.0 0 0 0

Main - TZA Main-TZA North-TZA North-TZA


Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

19436.25699 6602.495205 1795.033425 609.7728767


2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 338236.6 364.8 114899.0 395446.8 927 1 315 1083 2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2020 1339942.0 1499.6 455178.2 1573199.0 2744 3 932 3227 2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2021 2339142.0 2399.4 794606.5 2762832.0 2738 2 930 3259 2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2022 3326357.0 15284.7 1129963.0 3950192.0 2705 35 919 3253 2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2023 5545393.8 160119.6 1883770.0 6403369.0 6080 397 2065 6721 2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2024 12639627.6 712017.9 4293680.7 12068080.0 19436 1512 6602 15520 2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 740340.8 0 0 0 2028
2025 18817863.0 1476598.5 6392429.5 18038580.0 16927 2095 5750 16358 2025 655187.2 177747.5 222567.1 1680595.0 1795 487 610 2576
2026 23939494.0 2711016.8 8132245.6 24372750.0 14032 3382 4767 17354 2026 1262618.0 1057031.0 428911.4 2792342.0 1664 2409 565 3046
2027 28213794.0 4471355.8 9584226.2 30867060.0 11710 4823 3978 17793 2027 1701838.0 2066488.0 578114.3 3960342.0 1203 2766 409 3200
2028 31898449.0 6605664.7 10835897.7 37444840.0 10095 5847 3429 18021 2028 2093758.0 3105921.0 711249.8 5131542.0 1074 2848 365 3209
2029 35018116.0 8912947.9 11895656.0 44052310.0 8547 6321 2903 18103 2029 2453873.0 4149360.0 833580.6 6299542.0 987 2859 335 3200
2030 37724219.0 11568279.2 12814915.1 50586270.0 7414 7275 2519 17901 2030 2794184.0 5199196.0 949184.2 7467541.0 932 2876 317 3200
2031 39888477.0 13839338.1 13550112.7 56278200.0 5929 6222 2014 15594 2031 3122307.0 6269152.0 1060648.0 8630835.0 899 2931 305 3187
2032 41688234.0 15829293.6 14161494.3 61188310.0 4931 5452 1675 13452 2032 3371181.0 7145651.0 1145190.0 9687172.0 682 2401 232 2894
2033 43323230.0 18025221.0 14716896.5 65882390.0 4479 6016 1522 12860 2033 3566501.0 7910506.0 1211540.0 10661060.0 535 2095 182 2668
2034 44769554.0 20300393.0 15208218.6 70234550.0 3963 6233 1346 11924 2034 3720097.0 8552104.0 1263717.0 11500610.0 421 1758 143 2300
2035 46000662.0 22422346.0 15626424.0 74150550.0 3373 5814 1146 10729 2035 3813159.0 8957291.0 1295330.0 12133760.0 255 1110 87 1735
2036 47077305.0 24483172.0 15992163.0 77868290.0 2950 5646 1002 10186 2036 3905679.0 9358591.0 1326759.0 12692670.0 253 1099 86 1531
2037 47981566.0 26330314.0 16299334.0 81199880.0 2477 5061 842 9128 2037 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 13166550.0 178 773 61 1298
2038 48764440.0 28084661.0 16565276.0 84110130.0 2145 4806 729 7973 2038 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 13523990.0 0 0 0
2039 49483210.0 29755969.0 16809445.0 86677170.0 1969 4579 669 7033 2039 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 13806620.0 0 0 0
2040 50130162.0 31119493.0 17029216.0 88601370.0 1772 3736 602 5272 2040 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14001120.0 0 0 0
2041 50780667.0 32462451.0 17250197.0 90485810.0 1782 3679 605 5163 2041 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14185510.0 0 0 0
2042 51411191.0 33806731.0 17464379.0 92178640.0 1727 3683 587 4638 2042 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14347410.0 0 0 0
2043 52006491.0 35161500.0 17666602.0 93855710.0 1631 3712 554 4595 2043 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14506970.0 0 0 0
2044 52544384.0 36457892.0 17849331.0 95255990.0 1474 3552 501 3836 2044 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14640040.0 0 0 0
2045 52881312.0 37160599.0 17963783.0 96037910.0 923 1925 314 2142 2045 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14715730.0 0 0 0
2046 53137203.0 37693908.0 18050706.0 96673480.0 701 1461 238 1741 2046 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14779990.0 0 0 0
2047 53376514.0 38237810.0 18132000.0 97305300.0 656 1490 223 1731 2047 3970781.0 9640844.0 1348874.0 14845760.0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 7
Main - TZB Main-TZB North-TZB North-TZB
Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

17031.78082 4632.643836 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0
2019 594446.4 0.0 161689.4 702958.1 1629 0 443 1926 2019 0 0 0 0
2020 2590754.0 41640.8 704685.0 2969809.0 5469 114 1488 6211 2020 0 0 0 0
2021 4522388.0 190506.6 1230089.0 5402900.0 5292 408 1439 6666 2021 0 0 0 0
2022 7762381.0 484167.6 2111368.0 9527963.0 8877 805 2414 11302 2022 0 0 0 0
2023 13886530.0 1559140.0 3777137.0 15940730.0 16778 2945 4564 17569 2023 0 0 0 0
2024 20103130.0 5773515.0 5468052.0 22528730.0 17032 11546 4633 18049 2024 0 0 0 0
2025 24413140.0 11864930.0 6640375.0 29098730.0 11808 16689 3212 18000 2025 0 0 0 0
2026 27667100.0 19013470.0 7525452.0 35668730.0 8915 19585 2425 18000 2026 0 0 0 0
2027 30329830.0 26753240.0 8249714.0 42238730.0 7295 21205 1984 18000 2027 0 0 0 0
2028 32601880.0 34819360.0 8867711.0 48826730.0 6225 22099 1693 18049 2028 0 0 0 0
2029 34541160.0 41320140.0 9395196.0 55396730.0 5313 17810 1445 18000 2029 0 0 0 0
2030 36205290.0 46937760.0 9847839.0 61966730.0 4559 15391 1240 18000 2030 0 0 0 0
2031 37606930.0 52817870.0 10229080.0 68536730.0 3840 16110 1044 18000 2031 0 0 0 0
2032 38764520.0 58961970.0 10543950.0 75124730.0 3171 16833 863 18049 2032 0 0 0 0
2033 39714890.0 65293360.0 10802450.0 81694730.0 2604 17346 708 18000 2033 0 0 0 0
2034 40519370.0 71770630.0 11021270.0 88264730.0 2204 17746 600 18000 2034 0 0 0 0
2035 41211990.0 78269560.0 11209660.0 94815650.0 1898 17805 516 17948 2035 0 0 0 0
2036 41798450.0 83941700.0 11369180.0 101181500.0 1607 15540 437 17441 2036 0 0 0 0
2037 42332960.0 89648700.0 11514560.0 107520700.0 1464 15636 398 17368 2037 0 0 0 0
2038 42780750.0 94788720.0 11636360.0 113190400.0 1227 14082 334 15533 2038 0 0 0 0
2039 43114500.0 98615970.0 11727140.0 117412400.0 914 10486 249 11567 2039 0 0 0 0
2040 43388070.0 101530300.0 11801550.0 120650300.0 750 7984 204 8871 2040 0 0 0 0
2041 43647820.0 104391300.0 11872210.0 123818500.0 712 7838 194 8680 2041 0 0 0 0
2042 43872010.0 106968000.0 11933190.0 126660400.0 614 7059 167 7786 2042 0 0 0 0
2043 44040790.0 108879700.0 11979100.0 128771800.0 462 5238 126 5785 2043 0 0 0 0
2044 44196960.0 110809700.0 12021570.0 130886500.0 428 5288 116 5794 2044 0 0 0
2045 44300040.0 111988100.0 12049610.0 132186800.0 282 3228 77 3562 2045 0 0 0
2046 44390780.0 112937600.0 12074290.0 133243700.0 249 2601 68 2896 2046 0 0 0
2047 44477560.0 113889400.0 12097900.0 134298200.0 238 2608 65 2889 2047 0 0 0

Main - TZF Main-TZF North-TZF North-TZF


Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

31970.41096 10774.0274 916.2082192 308.7621918


2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 6454631.0 375789.8 2175211.0 8377947.0 17684 1030 5959 22953 2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2020 17522200.0 2034489.0 5904983.0 22641570.0 30322 4544 10219 39078 2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2021 29191400.0 5297028.0 9837503.0 39617500.0 31970 8938 10774 46509 2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2022 39564180.0 11904870.0 13333130.0 56882000.0 28419 18104 9577 47300 2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2023 47671690.0 20775600.0 16065360.0 74146500.0 22212 24303 7486 47300 2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2024 53581700.0 30997100.0 18057030.0 91458310.0 16192 28004 5457 47430 2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2025 58062830.0 42046280.0 19567180.0 108722800.0 12277 30272 4137 47300 2025 334416.0 170374.6 112698.2 0.0 916 467 309 0
2026 62010990.0 50683270.0 20897700.0 125158400.0 10817 23663 3645 45029 2026 658985.7 1305805.0 222078.2 0.0 889 3111 300 0
2027 65030270.0 58893240.0 21915200.0 140276600.0 8272 22493 2788 41420 2027 908029.2 2516761.0 306005.8 0.0 682 3318 230 0
2028 67237530.0 66933980.0 22659050.0 154193500.0 6047 22029 2038 38128 2028 1124701.0 3764089.0 379024.4 0.0 594 3417 200 0
2029 68972620.0 74509650.0 23243770.0 167024700.0 4754 20755 1602 35154 2029 1317487.0 5031304.0 443993.0 0.0 528 3472 178 0
2030 70380100.0 81862160.0 23718090.0 179205400.0 3856 20144 1300 33372 2030 1490378.0 6318412.0 502257.3 0.0 474 3526 160 0
2031 71531110.0 89471150.0 24105980.0 191307200.0 3153 20847 1063 33156 2031 1647088.0 7621703.0 555068.5 0.0 429 3571 145 0
2032 72570100.0 95804010.0 24456120.0 201987200.0 2847 17350 959 29260 2032 1791024.0 8941766.0 603575.1 0.0 394 3617 133 0
2033 73510030.0 102164100.0 24772880.0 212550700.0 2575 17425 868 28941 2033 1923123.0 10269670.0 648092.5 0.0 362 3638 122 0
2034 74333490.0 108640600.0 25050390.0 223076200.0 2256 17744 760 28837 2034 2045743.0 11607050.0 689415.3 0.0 336 3664 113 0
2035 75052800.0 115221300.0 25292790.0 233568100.0 1971 18029 664 28745 2035 2159596.0 12953190.0 727784.0 0.0 312 3688 105 0
2036 75679900.0 120944800.0 25504130.0 243088200.0 1718 15681 579 26082 2036 2264964.0 14311830.0 763293.0 0.0 289 3722 97 0
2037 76250690.0 126214000.0 25696480.0 252068200.0 1564 14436 527 24603 2037 2363085.0 15673710.0 796359.7 0.0 269 3731 91 0
2038 76735830.0 131285600.0 25859970.0 260738500.0 1329 13895 448 23754 2038 2455697.0 17041090.0 827570.1 0.0 254 3746 86 0
2039 77113670.0 135287700.0 25987310.0 268201200.0 1035 10965 349 20446 2039 2543191.0 18413600.0 857055.4 0.0 240 3760 81 0
2040 77439310.0 139354100.0 26097050.0 275666700.0 892 11141 301 20453 2040 2626205.0 19794590.0 885031.0 0.0 227 3784 77 0
2041 77694590.0 142771500.0 26183080.0 282383500.0 699 9363 236 18402 2041 2704639.0 21176150.0 911463.5 0.0 215 3785 72 0
2042 77896330.0 145489700.0 26251060.0 288330700.0 553 7447 186 16294 2042 2779240.0 22561550.0 936603.9 0.0 204 3796 69 0
2043 78077500.0 148228500.0 26312120.0 294150600.0 496 7504 167 15945 2043 2845023.0 23838250.0 958772.8 0.0 180 3498 61 0
2044 78240710.0 150993300.0 26367120.0 298618500.0 447 7575 151 12241 2044 2845023.0 23838250.0 958772.8 0.0 0 0 0 0
2045 78330940.0 152425000.0 26397530.0 301656500.0 247 3922 83 8323 2045 2845023.0 23838250.0 958772.8 0.0 0 0 0 0
2046 78413460.0 153802500.0 26425340.0 304628500.0 226 3774 76 8142 2046 2845023.0 23838250.0 958772.8 0.0 0 0 0 0
2047 78491460.0 155182100.0 26451620.0 307592900.0 214 3780 72 8122 2047 2845023.0 23838250.0 958772.8 0.0 0 0 0 0

Page 2 of 7
South South Total Total
Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate

Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI


Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2019 7387314.0 376154.6 2451799.4 9476351.9 20239 1031 6717 25963
2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2020 21452896.0 2077629.4 7064846.2 27184578.0 38536 4662 12638 48516
2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2021 36052930.0 5489934.0 11862198.5 47783232.0 40000 9349 13143 56435
2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2022 50652918.0 12404322.3 16574461.0 70360155.0 40000 18944 12910 61855
2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 180748.8 0 0 0 495 2023 67103613.8 22494859.6 21726267.0 96671347.8 45070 27645 14115 72085
2024 2739241.0 233666.4 927441.2 3319327.0 7505 640 2541 8599 2024 89063698.6 37716299.3 28746203.9 130114787.8 60165 41703 19233 91626
2025 8444586.0 1622079.2 2862706.3 7016458.0 15631 3804 5302 10129 2025 110728022.2 57358009.8 35797956.1 164557163.0 59354 53813 19320 94363
2026 12834268.0 3943467.8 4351510.0 11456830.0 12027 6360 4079 12165 2026 128373455.7 78714060.6 41557897.2 199449052.0 48344 58510 15781 95594
2027 16528444.0 6823855.0 5604367.0 16023840.0 10121 7891 3432 12512 2027 142712205.2 101524939.8 46237627.3 233366572.0 39284 62496 12821 92925
2028 19733977.0 10122794.0 6691518.0 20631730.0 8782 9038 2978 12624 2028 154690295.0 125351808.7 50144450.9 266228342.0 32817 65279 10704 90032
2029 22567471.0 13725510.0 7652524.0 25241470.0 7763 9870 2633 12629 2029 164870727.0 147648911.9 53464719.6 298014752.0 27892 61088 9097 87086
2030 25123759.0 17578032.0 8519540.0 29847490.0 7004 10555 2375 12619 2030 173717930.0 169463839.2 56351825.6 329073431.0 24239 59767 7910 85092
2031 27454951.0 21628021.0 9310245.0 34210920.0 6387 11096 2166 11955 2031 181250863.0 191647234.1 58811134.2 358963885.0 20638 60776 6738 81892
2032 29593352.0 25824290.0 10035584.0 38324040.0 5859 11497 1987 11269 2032 187778411.0 212506980.6 60945913.4 386311452.0 17884 57150 5849 74925
2033 31550944.0 30099788.0 10699617.0 42429020.0 5363 11714 1819 11247 2033 193588718.0 233762645.0 62851476.0 413217900.0 15919 58235 5221 73716
2034 33293489.0 34221683.0 11290685.0 46284420.0 4774 11293 1619 10563 2034 198681743.0 255092460.0 64523695.9 439360510.0 13953 58438 4581 71624
2035 34844098.0 38106603.0 11816622.0 49605380.0 4248 10644 1441 9099 2035 203082305.0 275930290.0 65968610.0 464273440.0 12056 57090 3959 68255
2036 36254944.0 41903520.0 12295154.0 52698390.0 3865 10403 1311 8474 2036 206981242.0 294943613.0 67250679.0 487529050.0 10682 52091 3513 63714
2037 37534355.0 45610100.0 12729101.0 55458290.0 3505 10155 1189 7561 2037 210433437.0 313117668.0 68384708.7 509413620.0 9458 49792 3107 59958
2038 38685816.0 49175700.0 13119640.0 57866360.0 3155 9769 1070 6597 2038 213393314.0 330016615.0 69357690.1 529429380.0 8109 46298 2666 54838
2039 39679986.0 52418950.0 13456797.0 60017180.0 2724 8886 924 5893 2039 215905338.0 344133033.0 70186621.4 546114570.0 6882 38675 2271 45713
2040 40443551.0 55027760.0 13715649.0 61591870.0 2092 7147 709 4314 2040 217998079.0 356467087.0 70877370.0 560511360.0 5734 33792 1892 39443
2041 41154130.0 57604990.0 13956537.0 63119570.0 1947 7061 660 4185 2041 219952627.0 368047235.0 71522361.5 573992890.0 5355 31726 1767 36936
2042 41751534.0 59955730.0 14159025.0 64485820.0 1637 6440 555 3743 2042 221681086.0 378422555.0 72093131.9 586002970.0 4736 28426 1564 32904
2043 42320832.0 62324770.0 14351983.0 65832330.0 1560 6491 529 3689 2043 223261417.0 388073564.0 72617451.8 597117410.0 4330 26441 1436 30451
2044 42775027.0 64418850.0 14505869.0 66945900.0 1244 5737 422 3051 2044 224572885.0 396158836.0 73051536.8 606346930.0 3593 22151 1189 25286
2045 43134418.0 66283690.0 14627561.0 67569500.0 985 5109 333 1708 2045 225462514.0 401336483.0 73346130.8 612166440.0 2437 14185 807 15944
2046 43479974.0 68159110.0 14744589.0 68081480.0 947 5138 321 1403 2046 226237221.0 406072212.0 73602571.8 617407150.0 2122 12975 703 14358
2047 43812755.0 70039580.0 14857289.0 68585300.0 912 5152 309 1380 2047 226974093.0 410827984.0 73846455.8 622627460.0 2019 13030 668 14302

South-TZA South-TZA Total-TZA Total-TZA


Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

12748.52603 4330.674795
2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2019 338236.6 364.8 114899.0 395446.8 927 1 315 1083
2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2020 1339942.0 1499.6 455178.2 1573199.0 2744 3 932 3227
2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2021 2339142.0 2399.4 794606.5 2762832.0 2738 2 930 3259
2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2022 3326357.0 15284.7 1129963.0 3950192.0 2705 35 919 3253
2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 180748.8 0 0 0 495 2023 5545393.8 160119.6 1883770.0 6584117.8 6080 397 2065 7216
2024 1598916.0 202360.4 543151.7 3319327.0 4381 554 1488 8599 2024 14238543.6 914378.3 4836832.4 16127747.8 23817 2066 8091 26147
2025 6252128.0 1220715.0 2123848.0 7016458.0 12749 2790 4331 10129 2025 25725178.2 2875061.0 8738844.6 26735633.0 31470 5372 10690 29063
2026 9763701.0 2960213.0 3316729.0 11456830.0 9621 4766 3268 12165 2026 34965813.0 6728260.8 11877886.0 38621922.0 25317 10557 8600 32565
2027 12697480.0 5140997.0 4313332.0 16023840.0 8038 5975 2730 12512 2027 42613112.0 11678840.8 14475672.5 50851242.0 20952 13563 7117 33505
2028 15247050.0 7631899.0 5179424.0 20631730.0 6985 6824 2373 12624 2028 49239257.0 17343484.7 16726571.5 63208112.0 18154 15520 6167 33854
2029 17513040.0 10342120.0 5949181.0 25241470.0 6208 7425 2109 12629 2029 54985029.0 23404427.9 18678417.6 75593322.0 15742 16605 5348 33932
2030 19568130.0 13235840.0 6647293.0 29847490.0 5630 7928 1913 12619 2030 60086533.0 30003315.2 20411392.3 87901301.0 13977 18079 4748 33720
2031 21453450.0 16271700.0 7287739.0 34210920.0 5165 8317 1755 11955 2031 64464234.0 36380190.1 21898499.7 99119955.0 11994 17471 4074 30736
2032 23194300.0 19401520.0 7879104.0 38324040.0 4769 8575 1620 11269 2032 68253715.0 42376464.6 23185788.3 109199522.0 10382 16428 3527 27615
2033 24795460.0 22573450.0 8423019.0 42429020.0 4387 8690 1490 11247 2033 71685191.0 48509177.0 24351455.5 118972470.0 9401 16802 3194 26775
2034 26213940.0 25559410.0 8904877.0 46284420.0 3886 8181 1320 10563 2034 74703591.0 54411907.0 25376812.6 128019580.0 8270 16172 2809 24787
2035 27467130.0 28281750.0 9330584.0 49605380.0 3433 7458 1166 9099 2035 77280951.0 59661387.0 26252338.0 135889690.0 7061 14382 2399 21562
2036 28606400.0 30886240.0 9717594.0 52698390.0 3121 7136 1060 8474 2036 79589384.0 64728003.0 27036516.0 143259350.0 6324 13881 2148 20191
2037 29640080.0 33378550.0 10068730.0 55458290.0 2832 6828 962 7561 2037 81592427.0 69349708.0 27716938.0 149824720.0 5488 12662 1864 17987
2038 30564600.0 35711090.0 10382790.0 57866360.0 2533 6391 860 6597 2038 83299821.0 73436595.0 28296940.0 155500480.0 4678 11197 1589 15550
2039 31347740.0 37705370.0 10648830.0 60017180.0 2146 5464 729 5893 2039 84801731.0 77102183.0 28807149.0 160500970.0 4115 10043 1398 13700
2040 31914860.0 39046630.0 10841480.0 61591870.0 1554 3675 528 4314 2040 86015803.0 79806967.0 29219570.0 164194360.0 3326 7410 1130 10119
2041 32443220.0 40346080.0 11020960.0 63119570.0 1448 3560 492 4185 2041 87194668.0 82449375.0 29620031.0 167790890.0 3230 7239 1097 9854
2042 32871460.0 41405980.0 11166440.0 64485820.0 1173 2904 399 3743 2042 88253432.0 84853555.0 29979693.0 171011870.0 2901 6587 985 8825
2043 33282810.0 42472970.0 11306170.0 65832330.0 1127 2923 383 3689 2043 89260082.0 87275314.0 30321646.0 174195010.0 2758 6635 937 8721
2044 33584970.0 43255090.0 11408820.0 66945900.0 828 2143 281 3051 2044 90100135.0 89353826.0 30607025.0 176841930.0 2302 5695 782 7252
2045 33801360.0 43802930.0 11482320.0 67569500.0 593 1501 201 1708 2045 90653453.0 90604373.0 30794977.0 178323140.0 1516 3426 515 4058
2046 34013450.0 44351810.0 11554370.0 68081480.0 581 1504 197 1403 2046 91121434.0 91686562.0 30953950.0 179534950.0 1282 2965 436 3320
2047 34220620.0 44900200.0 11624740.0 68585300.0 568 1502 193 1380 2047 91567915.0 92778854.0 31105614.0 180736360.0 1223 2993 416 3292

Page 3 of 7
South-TZB South-TZB Total-TZB Total-TZB
Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

0 0
2018 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 0 0 0 0 2019 594446.4 0.0 161689.4 702958.1 1629 0 443 1926
2020 0 0 0 0 2020 2590754.0 41640.8 704685.0 2969809.0 5469 114 1488 6211
2021 0 0 0 0 2021 4522388.0 190506.6 1230089.0 5402900.0 5292 408 1439 6666
2022 0 0 0 0 2022 7762381.0 484167.6 2111368.0 9527963.0 8877 805 2414 11302
2023 0 0 0 0 2023 13886530.0 1559140.0 3777137.0 15940730.0 16778 2945 4564 17569
2024 0 0 0 0 2024 20103130.0 5773515.0 5468052.0 22528730.0 17032 11546 4633 18049
2025 0 0 0 0 2025 24413140.0 11864930.0 6640375.0 29098730.0 11808 16689 3212 18000
2026 0 0 0 0 2026 27667100.0 19013470.0 7525452.0 35668730.0 8915 19585 2425 18000
2027 0 0 0 0 2027 30329830.0 26753240.0 8249714.0 42238730.0 7295 21205 1984 18000
2028 0 0 0 0 2028 32601880.0 34819360.0 8867711.0 48826730.0 6225 22099 1693 18049
2029 0 0 0 0 2029 34541160.0 41320140.0 9395196.0 55396730.0 5313 17810 1445 18000
2030 0 0 0 0 2030 36205290.0 46937760.0 9847839.0 61966730.0 4559 15391 1240 18000
2031 0 0 0 0 2031 37606930.0 52817870.0 10229080.0 68536730.0 3840 16110 1044 18000
2032 0 0 0 0 2032 38764520.0 58961970.0 10543950.0 75124730.0 3171 16833 863 18049
2033 0 0 0 0 2033 39714890.0 65293360.0 10802450.0 81694730.0 2604 17346 708 18000
2034 0 0 0 0 2034 40519370.0 71770630.0 11021270.0 88264730.0 2204 17746 600 18000
2035 0 0 0 0 2035 41211990.0 78269560.0 11209660.0 94815650.0 1898 17805 516 17948
2036 0 0 0 0 2036 41798450.0 83941700.0 11369180.0 101181500.0 1607 15540 437 17441
2037 0 0 0 0 2037 42332960.0 89648700.0 11514560.0 107520700.0 1464 15636 398 17368
2038 0 0 0 0 2038 42780750.0 94788720.0 11636360.0 113190400.0 1227 14082 334 15533
2039 0 0 0 0 2039 43114500.0 98615970.0 11727140.0 117412400.0 914 10486 249 11567
2040 0 0 0 0 2040 43388070.0 101530300.0 11801550.0 120650300.0 750 7984 204 8871
2041 0 0 0 0 2041 43647820.0 104391300.0 11872210.0 123818500.0 712 7838 194 8680
2042 0 0 0 0 2042 43872010.0 106968000.0 11933190.0 126660400.0 614 7059 167 7786
2043 0 0 0 0 2043 44040790.0 108879700.0 11979100.0 128771800.0 462 5238 126 5785
2044 0 0 0 0 2044 44196960.0 110809700.0 12021570.0 130886500.0 428 5288 116 5794
2045 0 0 0 0 2045 44300040.0 111988100.0 12049610.0 132186800.0 282 3228 77 3562
2046 0 0 0 0 2046 44390780.0 112937600.0 12074290.0 133243700.0 249 2601 68 2896
2047 0 0 0 0 2047 44477560.0 113889400.0 12097900.0 134298200.0 238 2608 65 2889

South-TZF South-TZF Total-TZF Total-TZF


Cumulative Average Rate Cumulative Average Rate
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
Oil Water Gas WI Oil Water Gas WI
(BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD) (BOPD) (BWPD) (MMSCFD) (BWPD)

3124.178082 1052.847945
2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2019 6454631.0 375789.8 2175211.0 8377947.0 17684 1030 5959 22953
2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2020 17522200.0 2034489.0 5904983.0 22641570.0 30322 4544 10219 39078
2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2021 29191400.0 5297028.0 9837503.0 39617500.0 31970 8938 10774 46509
2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2022 39564180.0 11904870.0 13333130.0 56882000.0 28419 18104 9577 47300
2023 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2023 47671690.0 20775600.0 16065360.0 74146500.0 22212 24303 7486 47300
2024 1140325.0 31306.0 384289.5 0.0 3124 86 1053 0 2024 54722025.0 31028406.0 18441319.5 91458310.0 19316 28090 6509 47430
2025 2192458.0 401364.2 738858.3 0.0 2883 1014 971 0 2025 60589704.0 42618018.8 20418736.5 108722800.0 16076 31752 5418 47300
2026 3070567.0 983254.8 1034781.0 0.0 2406 1594 811 0 2026 65740542.7 52972329.8 22154559.2 125158400.0 14112 28368 4756 45029
2027 3830964.0 1682858.0 1291035.0 0.0 2083 1917 702 0 2027 69769263.2 63092859.0 23512240.8 140276600.0 11038 27727 3720 41420
2028 4486927.0 2490895.0 1512094.0 0.0 1797 2214 606 0 2028 72849158.0 73188964.0 24550168.4 154193500.0 8438 27661 2844 38128
2029 5054431.0 3383390.0 1703343.0 0.0 1555 2445 524 0 2029 75344538.0 82924344.0 25391106.0 167024700.0 6837 26672 2304 35154
2030 5555629.0 4342192.0 1872247.0 0.0 1373 2627 463 0 2030 77426107.0 92522764.0 26092594.3 179205400.0 5703 26297 1922 33372
2031 6001501.0 5356321.0 2022506.0 0.0 1222 2778 412 0 2031 79179699.0 102449174.0 26683554.5 191307200.0 4804 27196 1619 33156
2032 6399052.0 6422770.0 2156480.0 0.0 1089 2922 367 0 2032 80760176.0 111168546.0 27216175.1 201987200.0 4330 23889 1459 29260
2033 6755484.0 7526338.0 2276598.0 0.0 977 3023 329 0 2033 82188637.0 119960108.0 27697570.5 212550700.0 3914 24086 1319 28941
2034 7079549.0 8662273.0 2385808.0 0.0 888 3112 299 0 2034 83458782.0 128909923.0 28125613.3 223076200.0 3480 24520 1173 28837
2035 7376968.0 9824853.0 2486038.0 0.0 815 3185 275 0 2035 84589364.0 137999343.0 28506612.0 233568100.0 3097 24903 1044 28745
2036 7648544.0 11017280.0 2577560.0 0.0 744 3267 251 0 2036 85593408.0 146273910.0 28844983.0 243088200.0 2751 22670 927 26082
2037 7894275.0 12231550.0 2660371.0 0.0 673 3327 227 0 2037 86508050.0 154119260.0 29153210.7 252068200.0 2506 21494 844 24603
2038 8121216.0 13464610.0 2736850.0 0.0 622 3378 210 0 2038 87312743.0 161791300.0 29424390.1 260738500.0 2205 21019 743 23754
2039 8332246.0 14713580.0 2807967.0 0.0 578 3422 195 0 2039 87989107.0 168414880.0 29652332.4 268201200.0 1853 18147 624 20446
2040 8528691.0 15981130.0 2874169.0 0.0 538 3473 181 0 2040 88594206.0 175129820.0 29856250.0 275666700.0 1658 18397 559 20453
2041 8710910.0 17258910.0 2935577.0 0.0 499 3501 168 0 2041 89110139.0 181206560.0 30030120.5 282383500.0 1414 16649 476 18402
2042 8880074.0 18549750.0 2992585.0 0.0 463 3537 156 0 2042 89555644.0 186601000.0 30180248.9 288330700.0 1221 14779 411 16294
2043 9038022.0 19851800.0 3045813.0 0.0 433 3567 146 0 2043 89960545.0 191918550.0 30316705.8 294150600.0 1109 14569 374 15945
2044 9190057.0 21163760.0 3097049.0 0.0 417 3594 140 0 2044 90275790.0 195995310.0 30422941.8 298618500.0 864 11169 291 12241
2045 9333058.0 22480760.0 3145241.0 0.0 392 3608 132 0 2045 90509021.0 198744010.0 30501543.8 301656500.0 639 7531 215 8323
2046 9466524.0 23807300.0 3190219.0 0.0 366 3634 123 0 2046 90725007.0 201448050.0 30574331.8 304628500.0 592 7408 199 8142
2047 9592135.0 25139380.0 3232549.0 0.0 344 3650 116 0 2047 90928618.0 204159730.0 30642941.8 307592900.0 558 7429 188 8122

Page 4 of 7
Near Haliba Formation Zone wise profile
Field Facility Zone Project Type Quantity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah Habshan Al Humrah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.17915 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah LBM Al Humrah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZA Al Humrah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZB Al Humrah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZF Al Humrah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 2.2377 2.238 2.238 1.239 0.654 0.475 0.377 0.311 0.216 0.179 0.155 0.133 0.115 0.099 0.087 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZG Al Humrah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.302 0.289 0.225 0.152 0.117 0.099 0.088 0.078 0.069 0.063 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah Habshan Al Humrah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah LBM Al Humrah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZA Al Humrah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZB Al Humrah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZF Al Humrah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 3 3.000 3.000 1.660 0.876 0.636 0.506 0.417 0.290 0.240 0.207 0.178 0.154 0.133 0.117 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZG Al Humrah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.478 0.373 0.252 0.194 0.165 0.146 0.129 0.115 0.105 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah Habshan Al Humrah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah LBM Al Humrah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZA Al Humrah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZB Al Humrah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZF Al Humrah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZG Al Humrah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 4.354009 4.357 4.360 3.754 3.399 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 2.964 2.892 2.804 2.708 2.617 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah Habshan Al Humrah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah LBM Al Humrah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZA Al Humrah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZB Al Humrah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZF Al Humrah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 1.340 2.124 2.364 2.494 2.583 2.151 2.108 2.117 2.092 2.044 1.983 1.917 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Al Humrah EPF1 - Al Humrah TZG Al Humrah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.127 0.248 0.306 0.335 0.354 0.371 0.385 0.395 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala Habshan Bu Nikhala_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.7225001 0.696 0.290 0.077 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZE Bu Nikhala_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.4155606 0.359 0.305 0.266 0.235 0.211 0.191 0.175 0.161 0.149 0.139 0.130 0.123 0.116 0.110 0.104 0.099 0.094 0.090 0.086 0.083
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZF Bu Nikhala_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.9010498 0.708 0.539 0.424 0.343 0.283 0.237 0.202 0.174 0.151 0.133 0.117 0.105 0.094 0.085 0.077 0.070 0.064 0.059 0.054 0.050
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala Habshan Bu Nikhala_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 2.0409607 1.966 0.818 0.217 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZE Bu Nikhala_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.1739 1.013 0.862 0.750 0.664 0.596 0.540 0.494 0.455 0.422 0.394 0.369 0.347 0.327 0.310 0.294 0.280 0.267 0.255 0.244 0.234
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZF Bu Nikhala_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 2.5453384 2.000 1.523 1.199 0.968 0.798 0.669 0.569 0.490 0.426 0.374 0.331 0.295 0.265 0.239 0.217 0.197 0.180 0.166 0.153 0.141
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala Habshan Bu Nikhala_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 2.4491529 3.455 3.225 3.105 1.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZE Bu Nikhala_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.4889808 1.452 1.402 1.367 1.341 1.321 1.305 1.292 1.282 1.273 1.265 1.259 1.253 1.248 1.244 1.240 1.236 1.233 1.230 1.228 0.751
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZF Bu Nikhala_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 3.0544061 2.945 2.850 2.785 2.739 2.705 2.679 2.659 2.643 2.631 2.620 2.612 2.604 2.598 2.593 2.589 2.585 2.581 2.578 2.576 2.574
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala Habshan Bu Nikhala_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 1.096 2.243 2.844 0.998 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZE Bu Nikhala_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.0803007 0.236 0.368 0.466 0.544 0.606 0.657 0.699 0.735 0.766 0.793 0.816 0.837 0.856 0.872 0.887 0.901 0.913 0.924 0.935 0.470
Bu Nikhala EPF2 - Bu Nikhala TZF Bu Nikhala_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.545 1.022 1.347 1.577 1.747 1.876 1.976 2.055 2.119 2.171 2.214 2.250 2.280 2.306 2.329 2.348 2.365 2.380 2.393 2.404
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla Hanifa Bu Qalla_Hanifa_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla TZF Bu Qalla_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.786 0.434 0.636 0.373 0.229 0.157 0.115 0.088 0.069 0.038 0.019 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla Hanifa Bu Qalla_Hanifa_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla TZF Bu Qalla_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 2.502 1.384 2.025 1.187 0.731 0.500 0.365 0.279 0.221 0.121 0.062 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla Hanifa Bu Qalla_Hanifa_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla TZF Bu Qalla_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 3.002 2.779 4.158 3.990 3.899 3.853 3.826 3.809 3.797 3.777 1.263 1.255 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla Hanifa Bu Qalla_Hanifa_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Qalla EPF3 - Bu Qalla TZF Bu Qalla_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 1.118 1.728 2.566 3.022 3.253 3.388 3.474 3.532 3.632 1.189 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah LBM Bu Tasah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZA Bu Tasah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.223 0.159 0.104 0.068 0.041 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZB Bu Tasah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.709 0.508 0.332 0.217 0.143 0.094 0.062 0.026 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZC Bu Tasah_TZC_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.443 0.331 0.246 0.195 0.160 0.136 0.117 0.103 0.092 0.083 0.075 0.069 0.063 0.058 0.054 0.051 0.048 0.045 0.039 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZD Bu Tasah_TZD_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.653 0.531 0.419 0.339 0.280 0.235 0.200 0.172 0.150 0.132 0.117 0.104 0.093 0.084 0.076 0.070 0.064 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZE Bu Tasah_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZF Bu Tasah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 1.517 0.845 0.475 0.305 0.212 0.156 0.120 0.095 0.077 0.038 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZG Bu Tasah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.246 0.115 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 6 Bu Tasah_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.353 0.263 0.186 0.135 0.100 0.076 0.059 0.046 0.037 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 7 Bu Tasah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.544 0.393 0.275 0.204 0.157 0.125 0.101 0.084 0.071 0.060 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 8 Bu Tasah_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.51 0.313 0.191 0.128 0.092 0.069 0.042 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah LBM Bu Tasah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZA Bu Tasah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.499 0.358 0.233 0.152 0.093 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZB Bu Tasah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.589 1.139 0.745 0.488 0.320 0.210 0.138 0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZC Bu Tasah_TZC_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.993 0.741 0.552 0.437 0.360 0.304 0.263 0.231 0.206 0.185 0.168 0.154 0.141 0.131 0.122 0.114 0.107 0.100 0.087 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZD Bu Tasah_TZD_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 1.464 1.190 0.939 0.759 0.627 0.526 0.448 0.386 0.336 0.295 0.261 0.233 0.209 0.189 0.171 0.156 0.143 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZE Bu Tasah_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZF Bu Tasah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 3.401 1.894 1.066 0.683 0.475 0.350 0.268 0.212 0.172 0.086 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZG Bu Tasah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.551 0.258 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 6 Bu Tasah_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.791 0.590 0.416 0.302 0.225 0.171 0.132 0.104 0.082 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 7 Bu Tasah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.22 0.881 0.617 0.457 0.352 0.279 0.227 0.188 0.158 0.135 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 8 Bu Tasah_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.143 0.703 0.427 0.287 0.207 0.156 0.094 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah LBM Bu Tasah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZA Bu Tasah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.599 0.571 0.546 0.530 0.518 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZB Bu Tasah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.907 1.817 1.738 1.687 1.653 1.631 1.617 1.601 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZC Bu Tasah_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.192 1.142 1.104 1.081 1.065 1.054 1.046 1.040 1.035 1.030 1.027 1.024 1.022 1.020 1.018 1.016 1.015 1.013 1.011 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZD Bu Tasah_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 1.757 1.702 1.652 1.616 1.590 1.569 1.554 1.541 1.531 1.523 1.517 1.511 1.506 1.502 1.498 1.495 1.493 1.478 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZE Bu Tasah_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZF Bu Tasah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 4.081 3.780 3.614 3.538 3.496 3.471 3.455 3.444 3.436 3.418 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZG Bu Tasah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.662 0.603 0.560 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 6 Bu Tasah_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.949 0.909 0.874 0.851 0.836 0.825 0.817 0.812 0.807 0.792 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 7 Bu Tasah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.464 1.396 1.344 1.311 1.290 1.276 1.265 1.258 1.252 1.247 1.236 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 8 Bu Tasah_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 1.372 1.284 1.229 1.201 1.185 1.175 1.162 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah LBM Bu Tasah_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZA Bu Tasah_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.142 0.266 0.347 0.407 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZB Bu Tasah_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.450 0.845 1.102 1.270 1.379 1.451 1.532 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZC Bu Tasah_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.252 0.441 0.557 0.634 0.689 0.730 0.762 0.788 0.808 0.825 0.840 0.852 0.863 0.872 0.880 0.887 0.893 0.907 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZD Bu Tasah_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.274 0.526 0.705 0.837 0.938 1.016 1.078 1.128 1.169 1.203 1.231 1.255 1.276 1.293 1.308 1.322 1.397 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZE Bu Tasah_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZF Bu Tasah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 1.507 2.336 2.718 2.926 3.052 3.133 3.189 3.229 3.315 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah TZG Bu Tasah_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.294 0.509 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 6 Bu Tasah_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.201 0.374 0.488 0.566 0.620 0.659 0.687 0.709 0.785 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 7 Bu Tasah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.339 0.603 0.763 0.868 0.941 0.993 1.032 1.062 1.085 1.140 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Bu Tasah EPF1 - Bu Tasah Unit 8 Bu Tasah_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.441 0.716 0.856 0.937 0.988 1.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C Habshan Prospect C_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.024 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZA Prospect C_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.026 0.020 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZB Prospect C_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.030 0.023 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZE Prospect C_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.024 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZF Prospect C_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.165 0.135 0.110 0.093 0.080 0.071 0.063 0.057 0.052 0.048 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.026 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZG Prospect C_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.031 0.025 0.020 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C Habshan Prospect C_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.0668114 0.055 0.045 0.038 0.032 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZA Prospect C_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.075 0.057 0.045 0.038 0.033 0.029 0.027 0.024 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZB Prospect C_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.084 0.064 0.050 0.042 0.036 0.032 0.029 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZE Prospect C_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.070 0.069 0.069 0.068 0.067 0.067 0.066 0.066 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.063 0.063 0.062 0.062 0.061 0.061 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.059 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZF Prospect C_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.466 0.383 0.311 0.262 0.226 0.199 0.178 0.161 0.147 0.135 0.125 0.116 0.108 0.102 0.096 0.091 0.086 0.082 0.078 0.075 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Page 5 of 7
Field Facility Zone Project Type Quantity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZG Prospect C_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.088 0.071 0.056 0.047 0.040 0.035 0.031 0.028 0.025 0.023 0.022 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C Habshan Prospect C_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.08 0.078 0.076 0.074 0.073 0.073 0.072 0.071 0.071 0.071 0.070 0.068 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZA Prospect C_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.090 0.086 0.084 0.082 0.081 0.081 0.080 0.080 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.078 0.078 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZB Prospect C_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.100 0.096 0.094 0.092 0.091 0.090 0.090 0.089 0.089 0.088 0.088 0.088 0.088 0.087 0.087 0.087 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZE Prospect C_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.084 0.084 0.084 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.083 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZF Prospect C_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.559 0.543 0.528 0.519 0.511 0.506 0.502 0.498 0.495 0.493 0.491 0.489 0.488 0.486 0.485 0.484 0.483 0.482 0.482 0.481 0.480 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZG Prospect C_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.105 0.102 0.099 0.097 0.096 0.095 0.094 0.093 0.093 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.092 0.091 0.089 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C Habshan Prospect C_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.012 0.022 0.029 0.034 0.038 0.041 0.044 0.046 0.047 0.049 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZA Prospect C_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.018 0.030 0.037 0.042 0.045 0.048 0.050 0.052 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZB Prospect C_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.020 0.034 0.042 0.047 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.059 0.061 0.062 0.063 0.064 0.065 0.066 0.070 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZE Prospect C_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZF Prospect C_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.084 0.155 0.204 0.240 0.267 0.288 0.305 0.320 0.331 0.341 0.350 0.358 0.364 0.370 0.375 0.380 0.384 0.388 0.392 0.395 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect C EPF2 - Prospect C TZG Prospect C_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.017 0.032 0.041 0.048 0.053 0.057 0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.069 0.070 0.084 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZA Prospect F_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.067 0.057 0.048 0.041 0.036 0.032 0.029 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZB Prospect F_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.092 0.073 0.058 0.048 0.041 0.036 0.032 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZC Prospect F_TZC_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.067 0.059 0.050 0.044 0.039 0.035 0.032 0.029 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZD Prospect F_TZD_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.134 0.056 0.046 0.040 0.035 0.031 0.028 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 6 Prospect F_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.065 0.051 0.040 0.033 0.028 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 7 Prospect F_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.13 0.052 0.041 0.034 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZA Prospect F_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.189 0.160 0.135 0.116 0.102 0.091 0.082 0.074 0.068 0.063 0.059 0.055 0.051 0.048 0.046 0.043 0.041 0.039 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZB Prospect F_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.261 0.207 0.164 0.136 0.116 0.101 0.089 0.080 0.073 0.067 0.061 0.057 0.053 0.050 0.047 0.044 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZC Prospect F_TZC_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.191 0.166 0.142 0.125 0.111 0.100 0.091 0.083 0.077 0.071 0.067 0.062 0.059 0.055 0.053 0.050 0.048 0.045 0.043 0.042 0.040 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZD Prospect F_TZD_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.376 0.158 0.131 0.112 0.098 0.087 0.078 0.071 0.065 0.060 0.055 0.052 0.048 0.046 0.043 0.041 0.039 0.037 0.035 0.034 0.032 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 6 Prospect F_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.183 0.145 0.114 0.094 0.080 0.069 0.061 0.055 0.050 0.046 0.042 0.039 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 7 Prospect F_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.368 0.147 0.117 0.097 0.083 0.072 0.064 0.058 0.052 0.048 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZA Prospect F_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.227 0.221 0.216 0.212 0.209 0.207 0.205 0.204 0.203 0.202 0.201 0.200 0.199 0.199 0.198 0.198 0.197 0.197 0.196 0.196 0.196 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZB Prospect F_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.313 0.302 0.294 0.288 0.284 0.281 0.279 0.277 0.275 0.274 0.273 0.272 0.271 0.271 0.270 0.270 0.269 0.269 0.268 0.268 0.268 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZC Prospect F_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.229 0.224 0.219 0.216 0.213 0.211 0.209 0.207 0.206 0.205 0.204 0.203 0.202 0.202 0.201 0.201 0.200 0.200 0.199 0.199 0.199 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZD Prospect F_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.452 0.220 0.214 0.210 0.208 0.205 0.204 0.202 0.201 0.200 0.199 0.198 0.198 0.197 0.197 0.196 0.196 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 6 Prospect F_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.220 0.212 0.206 0.202 0.199 0.197 0.196 0.194 0.193 0.193 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.190 0.190 0.189 0.189 0.189 0.189 0.188 0.188 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 7 Prospect F_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.442 0.214 0.208 0.204 0.201 0.199 0.197 0.196 0.195 0.194 0.193 0.193 0.192 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.189 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZA Prospect F_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.028 0.054 0.073 0.087 0.098 0.107 0.115 0.121 0.126 0.130 0.134 0.138 0.141 0.143 0.146 0.148 0.150 0.151 0.153 0.155 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZB Prospect F_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.053 0.097 0.125 0.145 0.160 0.171 0.181 0.188 0.194 0.199 0.204 0.208 0.211 0.214 0.217 0.219 0.221 0.223 0.225 0.226 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZC Prospect F_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.025 0.048 0.066 0.080 0.091 0.100 0.108 0.114 0.119 0.124 0.128 0.132 0.135 0.138 0.141 0.143 0.145 0.147 0.149 0.151 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F TZD Prospect F_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.030 0.057 0.076 0.090 0.101 0.110 0.117 0.123 0.128 0.133 0.136 0.140 0.143 0.145 0.147 0.149 0.151 0.153 0.154 0.156 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 6 Prospect F_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.039 0.070 0.090 0.104 0.114 0.122 0.128 0.134 0.138 0.141 0.145 0.147 0.149 0.152 0.153 0.155 0.156 0.158 0.159 0.160 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect F EPF2 - Prospect F Unit 7 Prospect F_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.037 0.067 0.087 0.101 0.112 0.120 0.127 0.132 0.136 0.140 0.143 0.146 0.148 0.151 0.153 0.154 0.156 0.157 0.158 0.159 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Habshan Prospect G_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.031 0.024 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect G_LBM_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect SRQ_LBM_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZA Prospect G_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZB Prospect G_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZC Prospect G_TZC_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZD Prospect G_TZD_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZE Prospect G_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.034 0.031 0.027 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.004 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZF Prospect G_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.109 0.075 0.053 0.041 0.033 0.028 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZG Prospect G_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.031 0.024 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 6 Prospect G_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 7 Prospect G_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Habshan Prospect G_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.0865011 0.067 0.052 0.042 0.036 0.031 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect G_LBM_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect SRQ_LBM_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZA Prospect G_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZB Prospect G_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZC Prospect G_TZC_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZD Prospect G_TZD_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZE Prospect G_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.0964416 0.087 0.077 0.069 0.062 0.057 0.052 0.049 0.045 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.026 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZF Prospect G_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.3078876 0.211 0.149 0.116 0.095 0.080 0.069 0.061 0.055 0.049 0.045 0.042 0.038 0.036 0.033 0.031 0.030 0.028 0.027 0.019 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZG Prospect G_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.0865011 0.067 0.052 0.042 0.036 0.031 0.027 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 6 Prospect G_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 7 Prospect G_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Habshan Prospect G_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect G_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZA Prospect G_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZB Prospect G_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZC Prospect G_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZD Prospect G_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.116 0.114 0.112 0.110 0.109 0.108 0.107 0.106 0.106 0.105 0.104 0.104 0.104 0.103 0.103 0.103 0.102 0.102 0.102 0.102 0.099 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZE Prospect G_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.369 0.350 0.338 0.331 0.327 0.324 0.322 0.320 0.319 0.318 0.317 0.316 0.316 0.315 0.315 0.314 0.314 0.313 0.313 0.312 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZF Prospect G_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.104 0.100 0.097 0.095 0.094 0.093 0.092 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZG Prospect G_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.104 0.100 0.097 0.095 0.094 0.093 0.092 0.088 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 6 Prospect G_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 7 Prospect G_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 8 Prospect G_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect G Habshan Prospect SRQ_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G LBM Prospect G_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZA Prospect G_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZB Prospect G_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZC Prospect G_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZD Prospect G_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.010 0.020 0.028 0.034 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.059 0.061 0.063 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.069 0.071 0.086 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZE Prospect G_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.097 0.158 0.192 0.213 0.228 0.239 0.247 0.253 0.258 0.263 0.266 0.269 0.272 0.274 0.276 0.278 0.280 0.281 0.289 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZF Prospect G_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.019 0.035 0.044 0.051 0.055 0.059 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G TZG Prospect G_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.019 0.035 0.044 0.051 0.055 0.059 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 6 Prospect G_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 7 Prospect G_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect G EPF2 - Prospect G Unit 8 Prospect G_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.066 0.053 0.043 0.036 0.031 0.027 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZA Prospect H_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.081 0.064 0.050 0.041 0.035 0.030 0.027 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZB Prospect H_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.066 0.055 0.045 0.038 0.033 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZC Prospect H_TZC_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.065 0.052 0.041 0.034 0.029 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZD Prospect H_TZD_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.059 0.046 0.036 0.030 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 6 Prospect H_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.059 0.046 0.036 0.030 0.025 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 7 Prospect H_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.186 0.151 0.121 0.102 0.087 0.077 0.068 0.062 0.056 0.051 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.039 0.036 0.034 0.033 0.031 0.030 0.028 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZA Prospect H_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.229 0.180 0.141 0.116 0.099 0.086 0.076 0.068 0.062 0.056 0.052 0.048 0.045 0.042 0.039 0.037 0.035 0.033 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZB Prospect H_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.187 0.154 0.126 0.106 0.092 0.081 0.073 0.066 0.060 0.055 0.051 0.048 0.045 0.042 0.039 0.037 0.035 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZC Prospect H_TZC_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.184 0.147 0.117 0.097 0.083 0.072 0.064 0.058 0.052 0.048 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZD Prospect H_TZD_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.168 0.131 0.102 0.084 0.071 0.062 0.055 0.049 0.044 0.041 0.037 0.035 0.032 0.030 0.028 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 6 Prospect H_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.168 0.131 0.102 0.084 0.071 0.062 0.055 0.049 0.044 0.041 0.037 0.035 0.032 0.030 0.028 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 7 Prospect H_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.223 0.216 0.210 0.206 0.203 0.201 0.199 0.198 0.197 0.196 0.195 0.194 0.194 0.193 0.193 0.193 0.192 0.192 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZA Prospect H_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.275 0.265 0.257 0.252 0.249 0.246 0.244 0.243 0.241 0.240 0.239 0.239 0.238 0.237 0.237 0.237 0.236 0.236 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZB Prospect H_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.224 0.218 0.212 0.208 0.205 0.203 0.201 0.200 0.199 0.198 0.197 0.196 0.196 0.195 0.195 0.194 0.194 0.194 0.193 0.193 0.193 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZC Prospect H_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.221 0.214 0.208 0.204 0.201 0.199 0.197 0.196 0.195 0.194 0.193 0.193 0.192 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.189 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZD Prospect H_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.201 0.194 0.188 0.184 0.182 0.180 0.179 0.177 0.177 0.176 0.175 0.175 0.174 0.174 0.173 0.173 0.173 0.172 0.172 0.172 0.172 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Page 6 of 7
Field Facility Zone Project Type Quantity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 6 Prospect H_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.201 0.194 0.188 0.184 0.182 0.180 0.179 0.177 0.177 0.176 0.175 0.175 0.174 0.174 0.173 0.173 0.173 0.172 0.172 0.172 0.172 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 7 Prospect H_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.035 0.064 0.084 0.098 0.109 0.117 0.124 0.130 0.134 0.138 0.142 0.144 0.147 0.149 0.151 0.153 0.155 0.156 0.157 0.159 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZA Prospect H_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.049 0.088 0.113 0.130 0.143 0.153 0.161 0.167 0.173 0.177 0.181 0.184 0.187 0.190 0.192 0.194 0.196 0.197 0.199 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZB Prospect H_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.033 0.061 0.080 0.095 0.106 0.114 0.121 0.127 0.132 0.136 0.139 0.142 0.145 0.147 0.150 0.151 0.153 0.155 0.156 0.157 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZC Prospect H_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.037 0.067 0.087 0.101 0.112 0.120 0.127 0.132 0.136 0.140 0.143 0.146 0.148 0.151 0.153 0.154 0.156 0.157 0.158 0.159 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H TZD Prospect H_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.036 0.065 0.084 0.096 0.106 0.113 0.119 0.123 0.127 0.130 0.133 0.135 0.138 0.139 0.141 0.142 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 6 Prospect H_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.036 0.065 0.084 0.096 0.106 0.113 0.119 0.123 0.127 0.130 0.133 0.135 0.138 0.139 0.141 0.142 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect H EPF2 - Prospect H Unit 7 Prospect H_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I Habshan Prospect I_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I Habshan Prospect I_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.029 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZE Prospect I_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.035 0.032 0.030 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZF Prospect I_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.135 0.092 0.065 0.050 0.041 0.035 0.030 0.026 0.024 0.021 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZG Prospect I_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.092 0.065 0.050 0.041 0.035 0.030 0.026 0.024 0.021 0.020 0.018 0.017 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZE Prospect I_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.098 0.091 0.084 0.078 0.073 0.069 0.065 0.062 0.059 0.056 0.054 0.052 0.050 0.049 0.047 0.046 0.044 0.043 0.042 0.041 0.040 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZF Prospect I_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.380 0.259 0.183 0.142 0.116 0.098 0.085 0.075 0.067 0.060 0.055 0.051 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZG Prospect I_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.112 0.259 0.183 0.142 0.116 0.098 0.085 0.075 0.067 0.060 0.055 0.051 0.047 0.044 0.041 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I Habshan Prospect I_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.134 0.128 0.124 0.122 0.120 0.119 0.118 0.117 0.114 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZE Prospect I_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.117 0.116 0.114 0.113 0.112 0.111 0.111 0.110 0.109 0.109 0.108 0.108 0.108 0.107 0.107 0.107 0.106 0.106 0.106 0.106 0.106 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZF Prospect I_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.456 0.432 0.417 0.409 0.404 0.400 0.397 0.395 0.394 0.392 0.391 0.391 0.390 0.389 0.389 0.388 0.388 0.387 0.387 0.387 0.386 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZG Prospect I_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.311 0.296 0.288 0.283 0.279 0.276 0.274 0.273 0.272 0.270 0.270 0.269 0.268 0.268 0.267 0.267 0.266 0.266 0.266 0.265 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I Habshan Prospect I_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZE Prospect I_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.014 0.020 0.025 0.029 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.043 0.045 0.047 0.049 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZF Prospect I_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.121 0.197 0.238 0.264 0.282 0.296 0.306 0.314 0.320 0.325 0.330 0.333 0.337 0.339 0.342 0.344 0.346 0.348 0.349 0.351 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect I EPF2 - Prospect I TZG Prospect I_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.148 0.000 0.076 0.117 0.144 0.162 0.175 0.185 0.193 0.199 0.204 0.209 0.213 0.216 0.219 0.221 0.223 0.225 0.227 0.229 0.230 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J Habshan Prospect J_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.034 0.028 0.021 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZE Prospect J_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.035 0.032 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.099 0.078 0.062 0.051 0.043 0.038 0.033 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZG Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.037 0.078 0.062 0.051 0.043 0.038 0.033 0.030 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J Habshan Prospect J_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZE Prospect J_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.098 0.091 0.083 0.077 0.072 0.067 0.064 0.060 0.057 0.054 0.052 0.050 0.047 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.041 0.040 0.038 0.037 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.280 0.221 0.174 0.144 0.122 0.107 0.094 0.085 0.077 0.070 0.065 0.060 0.056 0.052 0.049 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZG Prospect J_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.104 0.221 0.174 0.144 0.122 0.107 0.094 0.085 0.077 0.070 0.065 0.060 0.056 0.052 0.049 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZE Prospect J_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.117 0.116 0.114 0.113 0.112 0.111 0.110 0.110 0.109 0.108 0.108 0.107 0.107 0.107 0.106 0.106 0.106 0.106 0.105 0.105 0.105 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.336 0.324 0.315 0.309 0.305 0.301 0.299 0.297 0.295 0.294 0.293 0.292 0.291 0.291 0.290 0.289 0.289 0.288 0.288 0.288 0.287 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.242 0.266 0.256 0.250 0.246 0.243 0.240 0.238 0.237 0.236 0.234 0.233 0.233 0.232 0.231 0.231 0.230 0.230 0.229 0.229 0.229 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZG Prospect J_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.116 0.113 0.109 0.107 0.105 0.104 0.103 0.103 0.099 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZE Prospect J_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.014 0.020 0.026 0.030 0.034 0.038 0.041 0.043 0.046 0.048 0.050 0.052 0.054 0.055 0.057 0.058 0.059 0.060 0.062 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.106 0.136 0.158 0.173 0.186 0.195 0.203 0.210 0.215 0.220 0.224 0.228 0.231 0.234 0.236 0.238 0.240 0.242 0.244 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZF Prospect J_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.118 0.000 0.047 0.078 0.099 0.115 0.127 0.137 0.145 0.151 0.157 0.161 0.166 0.169 0.172 0.175 0.177 0.180 0.182 0.184 0.185 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect J EPF2 - Prospect J TZG Prospect J_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.018 0.037 0.048 0.056 0.062 0.066 0.069 0.086 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Habshan Prospect SRQ_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.034 0.024 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZA Prospect SRQ_TZA_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.034 0.031 0.027 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZB Prospect SRQ_TZB_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.039 0.035 0.031 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZC Prospect SRQ_TZC_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.033 0.030 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZD Prospect SRQ_TZD_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZE Prospect SRQ_TZE_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZF Prospect SRQ_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZG Prospect SRQ_TZG_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.073 0.068 0.063 0.058 0.054 0.050 0.047 0.044 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.033 0.031 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 6 Prospect SRQ_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 7 Prospect SRQ_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.069 0.043 0.029 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Habshan Prospect SRQ_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZA Prospect SRQ_TZA_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.096 0.087 0.077 0.069 0.062 0.057 0.052 0.049 0.045 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZB Prospect SRQ_TZB_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.109 0.098 0.087 0.078 0.070 0.064 0.059 0.055 0.051 0.048 0.045 0.043 0.040 0.038 0.036 0.035 0.033 0.032 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZC Prospect SRQ_TZC_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.093 0.086 0.078 0.072 0.067 0.062 0.058 0.055 0.052 0.049 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040 0.038 0.037 0.035 0.034 0.033 0.032 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZD Prospect SRQ_TZD_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZE Prospect SRQ_TZE_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.050 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.046 0.046 0.045 0.045 0.044 0.043 0.043 0.042 0.042 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.038 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZF Prospect SRQ_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.077 0.074 0.071 0.068 0.065 0.063 0.060 0.058 0.056 0.054 0.053 0.051 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.045 0.044 0.043 0.042 0.041 0.040 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZG Prospect SRQ_TZG_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.207 0.193 0.177 0.163 0.151 0.141 0.133 0.125 0.118 0.112 0.106 0.101 0.096 0.092 0.088 0.085 0.082 0.079 0.076 0.073 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 6 Prospect SRQ_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.037 0.036 0.036 0.035 0.035 0.034 0.034 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.032 0.032 0.031 0.031 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 7 Prospect SRQ_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.196 0.122 0.082 0.061 0.049 0.041 0.035 0.031 0.028 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ LBM Prospect SRQ_LBM_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.116 0.114 0.112 0.110 0.109 0.108 0.107 0.106 0.106 0.105 0.104 0.104 0.104 0.103 0.103 0.103 0.102 0.102 0.102 0.102 0.101 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZA Prospect SRQ_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.131 0.129 0.126 0.125 0.123 0.122 0.121 0.120 0.119 0.119 0.118 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.116 0.116 0.116 0.115 0.115 0.115 0.115 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZB Prospect SRQ_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.111 0.110 0.108 0.107 0.106 0.105 0.104 0.104 0.103 0.102 0.102 0.101 0.101 0.101 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZC Prospect SRQ_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.048 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZD Prospect SRQ_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.092 0.092 0.091 0.091 0.090 0.090 0.089 0.089 0.088 0.088 0.088 0.087 0.087 0.087 0.086 0.086 0.086 0.086 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZE Prospect SRQ_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.249 0.246 0.243 0.240 0.238 0.236 0.234 0.232 0.231 0.230 0.229 0.228 0.227 0.226 0.225 0.224 0.224 0.223 0.223 0.222 0.222 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZF Prospect SRQ_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.115 0.109 0.105 0.103 0.102 0.101 0.100 0.099 0.099 0.099 0.098 0.098 0.098 0.098 0.098 0.097 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZG Prospect SRQ_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 6 Prospect SRQ_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.235 0.220 0.212 0.208 0.205 0.204 0.203 0.202 0.201 0.201 0.200 0.200 0.199 0.199 0.199 0.199 0.198 0.198 0.198 0.198 0.198 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 7 Prospect SRQ_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 8 Prospect SRQ_Unit 8_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.059 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ LBM Prospect SRQ_TZA_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.028 0.034 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.057 0.059 0.061 0.063 0.064 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.069 0.071 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZA Prospect SRQ_TZB_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.022 0.031 0.039 0.045 0.050 0.054 0.058 0.061 0.064 0.066 0.069 0.071 0.073 0.074 0.076 0.077 0.078 0.080 0.081 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZB Prospect SRQ_TZC_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.014 0.021 0.026 0.030 0.034 0.038 0.041 0.044 0.046 0.049 0.051 0.052 0.054 0.056 0.057 0.059 0.060 0.061 0.062 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZC Prospect SRQ_Unit 6_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZD Prospect SRQ_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.014 0.017 0.019 0.021 0.023 0.024 0.026 0.028 0.029 0.030 0.032 0.033 0.034 0.035 0.036 0.037 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZE Prospect SRQ_TZG_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.031 0.044 0.056 0.066 0.075 0.083 0.090 0.096 0.101 0.106 0.111 0.115 0.119 0.123 0.126 0.129 0.132 0.134 0.137 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ TZF Prospect SRQ_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.029 0.048 0.058 0.065 0.070 0.073 0.076 0.078 0.079 0.081 0.082 0.083 0.084 0.085 0.087 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 6 Prospect SRQ_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.074 0.114 0.134 0.146 0.154 0.160 0.165 0.168 0.171 0.173 0.175 0.176 0.178 0.179 0.180 0.181 0.182 0.182 0.183 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 7 Prospect SRQ_TZD_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Prospect SRQ EPF2 - Prospect SRQ Unit 8 Prospect SRQ_TZE_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Habshan Riqeah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah TZF Riqeah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0.211 0.184 0.154 0.129 0.109 0.063 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Unit 7 Riqeah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base Gas Rate((MMscf/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Habshan Riqeah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah TZF Riqeah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.43 0.374 0.314 0.264 0.221 0.127 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Unit 7 Riqeah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base OilRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Habshan Riqeah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah TZF Riqeah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0.516 0.505 0.493 0.483 0.474 0.455 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Unit 7 Riqeah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterInjRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Habshan Riqeah_Habshan_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah TZF Riqeah_TZF_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.056 0.116 0.166 0.209 0.302 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Riqeah EPF2 - Riqeah Unit 7 Riqeah_Unit 7_Base_Yearly Base WaterRate(Mbbl/d) 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Page 7 of 7

You might also like