MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: GLECENIA

DENOY
Position: T3
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
ELEMENTARY/LEYTE
Rating Period: FEBRUARY 6,2023

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-y
per KRA
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater
ce Target (Principal)

Rating Remar Rating Rem

ks arks

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Year- 7% Classroom observation Quality 4.5

Educati Knowledge knowledge of Round tool (COT) rating sheet 5
on and content within and/or 5
Service Pedagogy and across inter-observer agreement
s curriculum form done through
teaching areas onsite/face-to-face/in-
(PPST 1.1.2) person classroom
observation
 Efficiency
If onsite/face-to-face/in
person classroom 5
observation are not
implemented,
• Through observation
of
synchronous/asynch
ronous teaching and
other modalities; or
• Through observation
of a demonstration Timeliness
teaching *via LAC
session

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 2. Used a Classroom observation

Educati range of tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
on teaching and/or
Service strategies that inter-observer agreement 4
s enhance form done through
learner onsite/face-to-face/in-
achievement person classroom
in literacy and observation
numeracy
skills. (PPST If onsite/face-to-face/in
1.4.2) person classroom
observation are not
 implemented Efficiency
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchrono 3
us teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration teaching
*via LAC session

Timeliness

Basic 3. Applied a Classroom observation Quality

Educati range of tool (COT) rating sheet
on teaching and/or 5
Service strategies to inter-observer agreement
s develop critical form done through
and creative onsite/face-to-face/in-
thinking, as person classroom
well as other observation
higher order
thinking If onsite/face-to-face/in
skills. (PPST person classroom
1.5.2) observation are not
implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
 per KRA Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
modalities; or ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
• Through observation of
a demonstration Efficiency
teaching *via LAC
session 4

Timeliness

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% Classroom observation Quality

Educati Environme classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt and structure to and/or 5
Service Diversity engage inter-observer agreement
s of Learners learners, form done through
individually or onsite/face-to-face/in-
in groups, in person classroom
meaningful observation Efficiency
exploration,
discovery and If onsite/face-to-face/in 3
hands-on person classroom
activities within observation are not
a range of implemented,
physical
learning • Through observation of
environments. synchronous/asynchr
Timeliness
(PPST 2.3.2) on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
7% • Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation Quality
Educati learner tool (COT) rating sheet
on behavior and/or 5
Service constructively inter-observer agreement
s by applying form done through
positive and onsite/face-to-face/in-
non-violent person classroom
discipline to observation
ensure learning

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
focused If onsite/face-to-face/in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
environments person classroom ce Target
(PSST 2.6.2) observation are not Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
implemented,
Efficiency
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr 3
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
7% session

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Classroom observation Quality
Education differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services developmental and/or 5
ly appropriate inter-observer agreement
learning form done through
experiences to onsite/face-to-face/in-
address person classroom
learners’ observation
gender, needs,
strengths, If onsite/face-to-face/in
interests and person classroom Efficiency
experiences. observation are not
(PPST 3.1.2) implemented, 3
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 7% Classroom observation Quality
Education Curriculu managed and tool (COT) rating sheet
Services m and implemented and/or 5
Planning developmental inter-observer agreement
ly sequenced form done through
teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom
processes to observation
meet
curriculum If onsite/face-to-face/in
requirements person classroom
and varied observation are not Efficiency
teaching implemented,
contexts.
(PPST 4.1.2) • Through observation of 3
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness
7%
8. Participated 1. Proof/s of Quality
in collegial attendance in LAC
discussions Sessions/FGDs/meeting
that use s/other collegial
teacher and discussions
learner
feedback

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
 per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
to enrich 2. Minutes of LAC Target
teaching Sessions/FGDs/meeting Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
practice. (PPST s/ and other collegial
4.4.2) discussions on the use Efficiency
of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich 5
teaching practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices Timeliness
following participations
from LAC 3
sessions/FGDs/meeting
s/other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
7%

Basic 9. Selected, Classroom observation Quality

Educatio developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
n organized and and/or 5
Services used inter-observer agreement
appropriate form done through
teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom
resources, observation
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
including ICT, If onsite/face-to-face/in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
to address person classroom ce Target
learning observation are not Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
goals. implemented,
(PPST 4.5.2) Efficiency
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr 4
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
Timeliness

Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% Classroom observation Quality

Educati Assessme selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt and organized and and/or 5
Service Reporting used inter-observer agreement
s diagnostic, form done through
formative and onsite/face-to-face/in-
summative person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with If onsite/face-to-face/in
curriculum person classroom
requirements. observation are not
(PPST 5.1.2) implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
 session

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per
KRA Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)

Rating Remarks Rating Rema

rks

Efficiency

7%

Timeliness

Basic 11. Any one of the Quality

Educa Monitored
tion and following: • Individual
5
Servic evaluated Learning
es learner Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
progress
and • Peer Assessment Data •
Efficiency
achievemen Sample of Learner’s output
t with reflection/self 5
 using assessment Timeliness
learner
attainme • Progress
nt data. Charts/Anecdotal
(PPST Records
5.2.2) • Class/e-class
records/grading sheets
• Lesson Plan showing
index of mastery
• Frequency of errors
with identified least
mastered
skills
• Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g. Individual
Learning
Achievement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
• Others (Please specify and

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
provide annotations) Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
ce Target
7% Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12.Communicat Any one (1) of the Quality .350
Educati ed promptly following:
on and 5
Service clearly the • A sample of corrected
s learners’ test paper of learner in
needs, a
progress and learning area with
achievement to
parents’ or guardian’s
key
stakeholders, signature and date of Efficiency
including receipt
5
parents/ • Minutes of meeting with
guardians
(PPST 5.4.2) key stakeholders (e.g.
PTC, SGC, SPT, CPC)
with proof of attendance
• Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
Timeliness
supported by minutes of
the meeting
• Communication with
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co
teacher, LGU) using
various modalities
• Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
• Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
• Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
 13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal Quality .350
personal entry that highlights
philosophy of the application of a 5
teaching that is learner-centered
Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating
per KRA
learner teaching philosophy in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
centered. the lesson plan or ce Target
(PPST 7.1.2) community work. Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

14. Set 7% 1. Certification form the ICT Quality .350

professional Coordinator/School Head/
development Focal Person in-charge of e- 5
goals based SAT 2. IPCRF-DP
on the 3. Mid-year Review Form Efficiency
Philippine (MRF) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Professional from Phase II 5
Standards for
Teachers Timeliness
(PPST 7.5.2)

Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality .086
Educati
• Committee involvement
various related
on works/ 3
Service activities that • Involvement as
s contribute to
the teaching module/learning
 learning material writer/validator
• Involvement as a
process.

resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/School
initiated TV/Radio Efficiency
based instruction
• Book or journal 5
authorship/co
authorship/contributor
ship
• Advisorship/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
• Participation in
Timeliness
demonstration teaching
• Participation as 5
research presenter in a
forum or conference
• Mentoring or pre
service/in-service
teachers
• Conducted research

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating 4.391
per KRA
within the rating period Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target
• Others please specify Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 with annotation on
how it contributed to
the teaching learning
process.

Ratee:

GLECENIA DENOY
Ratee

Rater:

LILANIE C. VIOVICENTE