Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Child Family and Community Family Centered Early Care and Education 5Th Ed Edition Ebook PDF Version All Chapter Scribd Ebook PDF
Child Family and Community Family Centered Early Care and Education 5Th Ed Edition Ebook PDF Version All Chapter Scribd Ebook PDF
support healthy growth and development so that the child functions fully as a
competent community member.
◆ The book emphasizes cultural contexts. Valuing diversity, plus acknowledging
and understanding cultural contexts, has always been an important foundation
of this book. The new edition puts even more emphasis on perceiving and appre-
ciating cultural differences in order to embrace them. The attitude of acceptance
that develops challenges the students to expand their definitions of “develop-
mentally appropriate practice.”
◆ Reflection on personal experience is encouraged. Readers are asked to bring
their own ideas, experiences, and insights to their reading—in accordance with
Jean Piaget’s ideas about learners attaching new knowledge to existing knowl-
edge. In other words, readers are encouraged to reach into their own experiences
to make sense of new information in terms of what they already know. They are
encouraged to see how that same approach works equally well when relating
to families and conveying information to them. Whether a student, a teacher,
or a parent, respect for one’s own background, experiences, knowledge, ideas,
and insights is important. Because whatever we read always filters through our
own subjective experiences, this text acknowledges that fact and capitalizes on
it. Thus students can feel at home and find their own voices. They are asked to
do the same for the children and families they work with.
◆ Anecdotes and examples are provided throughout. Each chapter contains
stories and examples designed to take the subject out of the realm of theory and
into the real world of practice. Examples are designed to appeal to both tradi-
tional and non-traditional students, reflecting the changing demographics of the
United States.
◆ Advocacy is emphasized. The “Advocacy in Action” feature appeals to those
students who want to “do something!” about improving the lives of children,
families, the education systems, and society in general. This feature gives stu-
dents ideas about ways of being public and personal advocates.
Online PowerPoint Slides: PowerPoint slides highlight key concepts and strategies in each chapter. They
can be used to enhance lectures and discussions, or can be posted on your learning management system
as an additional study r esource for your students.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to the reviewers of this edition: Vernell D. Larkin, Hopkinsville Community College; Tonia Pa-
drick, Cape Fear Community College; Tasha Smith, Solano Community College; and Shaquam Urquhart Ed-
wards, College of Marin.
This page intentionally left blank
Brief Contents
References 345
Index 369
xi
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
xiii
xiv Contents
Summary 95
Quiz 95
For Discussion 96
Websites 96
Further Reading 96
Differential Socialization 254
Differential Treatment from Parents 256
Differential Treatment in Preschool 256
Differential Treatment in Elementary School 257
Guidelines for Parents and Educators 258
Summary 260
Quiz 260
For Discussion 261
Websites 261
Further Reading 261
For Discussion 306
Websites 307
Further Reading 307
References 345
Index 369
CHAPTER
GVictoria/Fotolia
The Child in
Context of Family
and Community
Learning Outcomes
In this chapter you will learn to…
• Explain how to look at context through the lens of bioecological theory.
• Describe the implications of family-centered approaches, including the
benefits to children, teachers, and parents.
• Explain the history of family-centered care and education.
• Define multiple lenses through which to look at family-centered
approaches, including family systems theory, whole child perspective,
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and culture as a lens.
The Child in Context of Family and Community 3
W hy is the title of this book Child, Family, and Community? Here’s why. Many
people go into the profession of teaching in general and into early care and
education specifically because they love children. They find they relate well to chil-
dren, and they enjoy being with them. When these individuals start taking classes,
they find that their studies focus on the development and education of children. The
course for which this book is designed also focuses on the child, but with a difference.
This book takes the position that children must be looked at in context—meaning
that each child must be viewed in the context of his or her family, and each family
must be viewed in the context of the community/communities/society to which it be-
longs. Taking this larger view of each child will help readers remember to always keep
the context in mind, no matter what aspect of child development and/or education
they study.
What are the various contexts that families come in? Culture is certainly one
overarching context which relates to ethnicity, and is affected by socioeconomic level,
family structure, sexual orientation and all the other variables that make this particu-
lar family what it is. Immigrant status, if any, is also a context. With immigrant num-
bers increasing, language and cultural diversity are becoming more obvious, though
ours has always been a diverse country. In one sense we are all immigrants except for
people who were on this continent first, those who can be considered indigenous.
Their descendants are still here. The rest of the population is made up of immigrants,
whether willing or unwilling (Ogbu, 1987). This list of influences on families repre-
sents just the tip of the iceberg. It’s a sample of all the ways in which families differ
from each other by their contexts. For more information about America’s children and
families, see the website for the Kids Count Data Center.
Another huge influence on children is the community. The child and family are
always placed in a community context. What community a family is in makes a big
difference. My husband’s family moved from Puebla, Mexico, to the San Francisco
Bay area in California many years ago—when my husband was 21 years old. They left
behind countless relatives. When we visit those relatives and their descendants, we
can see the different courses their lives took from those who moved to the United
States. Just a few of the influences that have affected the U.S. family and the Mexican
family in different ways are the changing international, national, and local political
situations; the economies of
the two countries and the lo-
cal economies; and the changes
that occur when one culture
bumps up against a nother one,
as is happening in both coun-
tries.
Education, development,
learning, and socialization al-
ways occur in a context, and any
specific context is embedded
imtmphoto/Fotolia
order to understand its life. This whole book is about the education and socialization
of the child in context. Simply put, the book examines the child in the context of de-
velopmental theory, which comes in the context of family, which lies in the context of
community. All of these contexts can be thought of as environments or settings that
hold people, which influence each other and are influenced by culture.
Understanding the bigger picture of how the child becomes a social being in
context has been the theme of this book along with a further area of focus and that
is on working with the family. Rather than making parent education and involve-
ment just one component and dedicating a chapter to them, this book is about
family-centered care and education. To understand both the child and the family in
context, we need an encompassing theory.
s
Chrono ystem
(Time)
overarching values
mass
media
ip
sh s
kin work as p
t school sis
ne care
cu
ub anc
s
hild ased
lic e
ltu
s
t
i ew
re
ily ter-b re pa
m n am lat
ld v
ce rogr i
or fa
re h ation
or
nt ips
w or
on niz
p d
immemiiate
-te
s
ga
fa ly
ach and/or
d
er
d
neighborhoo
extended
te
pla e neighbo
clo (if any) s
neighborhoo
greater
family
banks
immedia
food
s
ymates and
s
ork
)
or job
Child
(pl rent w
r
h
ar ild
cc
ace
teachersrs
par
e pa
are f to
and pee
to
en t
a w
ve al
Micro stem
o
sy
rnm
go loc
ms
n
r try
leg ices
sp eligious or us
se
sto
d
ide
iritu l in
rv
al
cu
al gro loca
olo
ups
Mesosystem
gie
s
health services
(including mental)
Exosystem
laws
Macrosystem
The exosystems layer is a wider context—and though the child may not
have direct contact with it, the systems affect the child’s development and
socialization—as do all the systems. Because the people in the child’s life are af-
fected by the exosystems and mesosystems, the child is also. The exosystems can
be thought of as the broader community, including people, services, and environ-
ments. Examples of what is in the exosystems layer are extended family, family
networks, mass media, workplaces, neighbors, family friends, community health
systems, legal services, and social welfare services. An example of how the exo-
systems affect the child shows up when a parent goes to work or gets laid off from
work. The changes in the parent’s life have an impact on the child’s life. Another
example of an exosystem affecting the microsystems is when a family has to move
because their apartment building is scheduled to be torn down to make room for
urban renewal.
6 CHAPTER 1
The outer layer, called the macrosystems, contains the attitudes and ideolo-
gies, values, laws, and customs of a particular culture or subculture. The chrono-
system comprises the largest and the most outward layer of the embedded circles.
Brofenbrenner used the chronosystem to hold events that occur over a span of time.
It could include family transitions such as divorce or relocations as well as socio-
historical events such as the terrorist attack on the United States that happened on
September 11, 2001.
The point of the bioecological model is that each component interacts with
other components, creating a highly complex context in which the child grows
up. Another point is that the child isn’t just a passive recipient of what goes on
in his or her life. The child at the center of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model
interacts directly with the people in the microsystems and some in the
Check Your m esosystems, and the effects of the interaction go both ways. As people
Understanding 1.1 affect the child, so the child has an influence on them. Another point is that
Click here to check your nothing ever remains static. As a result, the child, systems, and environ-
understanding of bioecological
ments are ever changing. Milestones and life events occur as time passes,
theory.
the child grows, and the contexts change.
FAMILY-CENTERED APPROACHES
So understanding the child in context, as per Bronfenbrenner’s theory, brings
up some important questions. One such question is this one that relates to the
human service sector: How can early interventionists, social workers, teachers, or
child care providers work to support a child without working with the family and
the community? Obviously they can’t, especially when the family is one that has
multiple issues going on, all of which affect the children in the family. One program
in California works with children in low-income families in a poverty community to
ensure their health and well-being (Bernard & Quiett, 2003). Of course, there is no
way to focus on a child, even one in crisis, without addressing the bigger picture.
This particular program used home visitors who were qualified social workers and
also had to work with the services in the community—a two-pronged approach.
Not only did the program focus on the
child, but it also involved the family,
plus the human service agencies the
family need to interface with.
Another more widely known pro-
gram, one that is much larger and
hugely funded, is Geoffrey Canada’s
Harlem Children’s Zone in New York
City. Canada’s goal has been not only
to have every child finish his or her edu-
cation by graduating from college but
Monkey Business/Fotolia
writes the story of what was involved, including parent support, starting with
Watch this video to see
prenatal parenting classes. It became quickly evident that no matter how
Geoffrey Canada speak about the
supportive the program was, there was a good deal of work to be done in the
Harlem Children’s Zone. What do
child care and education system and other community services if the children you think about the impact of what
were to succeed in school and in society. he refers to as the pipeline that starts
A third example of a family-centered approach is Head Start, which uses at birth?
a Parent, Family, Community Engagement Framework to work with young chil-
www.youtube.com/watch?v=
dren from low-income families. Head Start has long been a leader in the early 1H0k2TDZF7o
childhood field by introducing a major parent, family component from the very
beginning. To learn more about the Head Start Community Engagement Frame-
work, the PDF document can be downloaded from the Head Start website.
Watch this video about the
That brings us to educational services. Here’s a big question: Why is it
comprehensive nature of the Head
that so many education systems don’t do what the three examples just de- Start program. What do you think of
scribed do? Instead many programs expect families to send their children the teacher preparation requirements
off to child care, preschool, or school and leave the families themselves that are described?
out of the picture except for enrollment, parent night, and parent/teacher
conferences. Since the first edition of this book, that situation has begun
to change from programs that called themselves child centered to those that take
a family-centered approach. Part of the reason for this movement is increasing re-
gard for the greater context the family is in, which includes culture, ethnicity, and
economics, among others, all of which influence the family’s p hysical and social
location in the neighborhood, community, and greater society (Bloom, Eisenberg,
& Eisenberg, 2003; Epstein, 2001; F itzgerald, 2004; G onzalez-Mena, 2009; Keyser,
2006; Lee, 2006; Lee & Seiderman, 1998; McGee-Banks, 2003). Leaders in the move-
ment see the importance of including the families in all aspects of their children’s
schooling, care, and education.
Family-Centered Defined
What is a family-centered approach? A family-centered approach takes the individual
child and the group of children out of the spotlight and instead focuses on the chil-
dren within their families. In the case of educational programs, that means that parent
involvement isn’t something the teacher does in addition to the program for children,
but that the program includes the family as an integral, inseparable part of the child’s
education and socialization. Families, along with their children, are the program.
What does a family-centered program look like? Family-centered programs offer
a variety of services, services in tune with what the parents as individuals and as a
group need and want. But more than just services, they offer partnerships between
professionals and families. Collaboration is a key word. The point is for professionals
to become allies with families and share power. In a partnership, each partner brings
a special set of strengths and skills that enhance the group. Through building rela-
tionships and ongoing communication the partnership results in mutual learning
as both sides share resources and information with each other. Everyone b enefits:
the early educators, the families, and the children!
and appreciation that they might not receive otherwise. Partnership-type relation-
ships can be very rewarding! Through relationships with families teachers can b
ecome
more a part of the local community, if they aren’t part of it already.
Mutual Benefits
Family-centered programs can expand everybody’s horizons. One benefit for both
teachers and parents is that of self-knowledge about their own culture—the beliefs and
values that come from their roots and group membership. This benefit occurs whenever
teachers and parents run into practices that seem wrong, or at least uncomfortable,
and are able to talk to each other nonjudgmentally about their differences so they can
come to understand not only their own but the other person’s views (Im, Parlakian, &
Sanchez, 2007). Barbara Rogoff, in her book The Cultural Nature of Human Development, has
advice about how to expand awareness of one’s own culture as well as understand the
patterns behind the thought and behavior of other cultures. She suggests that when
you run into something you don’t understand, it’s best to put aside value judgments
at first. Once you can see your own cultural patterns you are in a better position to
understand others and determine whether a value judgment is necessary or not.
Families, including their children, and professionals gain from the collaborative
relationship in several other ways, including:
◆◆ Enhanced communication as the groups relate to each other around shared
power and decision making
◆◆ Supportive relationships leading to networks of mutual support
The community also gains when families and ECE programs work together.
These partnerships increase the chances of a better-educated population and a
more pluralistic society, one that values the richness diversity brings. As families
and professionals work together, another ultimate outcome can be equity and social
justice growing from mutual understanding and acceptance.
10 CHAPTER 1
If you look back on what you’ve just read, you can see how it fits in with
Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model. The child, in his or her microsystem, is
Check Your influenced by family, teachers, and peers who are also influenced by the me-
Understanding 1.2 sosystems, exosystems, and also macrosystems, which are where cultural
differences, values, customs, and ideologies come in. Laws are part of that
Click here to check your
understanding of family-centered
outward system as well and are influenced by the culture, values, and ideolo-
approaches. gies of the people who make them. The chronosystem, the outside layer, in
turn affects all the other systems.
Partnerships. The handbook lists the six types of partnerships that reflect Gordon’s
hierarchy using a little different language and going one step further to include
“collaborating with the community.”
Here is Epstein’s list:
◆◆ Parenting
◆◆ Communicating school-to-home and home-to-school
◆◆ Volunteering
◆◆ Helping students learn at home
◆◆ Decision making (including families as participants in school decisions, gover-
nance, and advocacy through PTA/PTO, school councils, committees, and other
parent organizations)
◆◆ Collaborating with the community
As parents move up the “involvement ladder,” they move beyond thinking about
just their own children and becoming an advocate for them to looking at advocating
for all children, including ways to improve the program, the school, or the system
(see Figure 1.2).
Family-centered care and education is a giant step forward from parent involve-
ment hierarchies. It involves a much larger vision of families being vital parts of their
children’s care and education.
The NAEYC supports family-centered programs saying, “Young children’s
learning and development are integrally connected to their families. Consequently,
to support and promote children’s optimal learning and development, programs
need to recognize the primacy of children’s families, establish relationships with
families based on mutual trust and respect, support and involve families in their
children’s educational growth, and invite families to fully participate in the program”
(NAEYC, 2005, p. 11). The NAEYC also came out with a book, From Parents to Partners:
Building a Family-Centered Early Childhood Program (Keyser, 2006), and instituted a proj-
ect in 2007 called Strengthening Family-Teacher Partnerships, which started with
several “training the trainer” institutes.
The Harvard Family Research Project (HFRP) has been and is still aggressively
working on linking families to their children’s educational programs. When parent
involvement takes the form of family support, there is evidence that it can lower
Collaborating
with the
Decision making community
Helping
students learn
Volunteering at home
Communicating
between home
Parenting and school
Figure 1.2 Six types of parent partnerships that lead parents to move up the involvement
ladder, based on the E
pstein model
The Child in Context of Family and Community 13
stress levels in parents and make their lives easier. The HFRP website has links to
areas of research and resources.
The Parent Services Project (PSP) was started in the 1980s by Ethel
Watch this video about the
Seiderman in California as a mission to strengthen families by having them
Patrick O’Hearn School in Boston,
take leadership in assuring the well-being of children, families, and commu-
Massachusetts, and how school
nities (Lee, 2006; Lee & Seiderman, 1998). PSP now provides training, tech- communities change when families
nical assistance, and consultation nationally to help programs and schools become involved. Does the idea of
engage families. Instead of merely involving families, the approach they take parent involvement bring up feelings
is to provide a wide variety of services that reflect the interests and needs of excitement or apprehension for
of the families enrolled. Instead of predetermining what will be offered, the you?
programs are designed to involve families in deciding, planning, and organiz-
ing the activities. As a result, programs trained in the PSP approach find increased
parent involvement, leadership, and participation, which strengthens community
ties and leads to effective community building (Pope & S eiderman, 2001; Seiderman,
2003). The Parent Services Project website highlights the organization’s mission,
values, programs, and events.
One of the goals of many programs working with parents is child abuse pre-
vention. An approach to preventing child abuse is to focus on what are called
“protective factors.” Examples of protective factors are: parental resilience, social
connections, parenting skills, and child development knowledge. When profes-
sionals identify a family at risk for child abuse, they can help most by considering,
supporting, and augmenting protective factors. Professional support and help in
times of need can go a long way toward lowering child abuse incidents. Early care
and education professionals are a logical group for working with parents to gain
positive results and lower the risk of child abuse. The delivery system comes from
early care and education professionals who learn how to support parents, p rovide
resources, and teach coping strategies that will then reduce stress and prevent
child abuse.
One of the premises of all these family-centered early care and education pro-
grams is that they work better when professionals understand families and involve
them in respectful ways. Instead of the teacher just sharing information with fam-
ilies, there is two-way information sharing. This is true for general early care and
education programs and also for special education. There is some evidence that
parent involvement is a critical factor in early intervention programs. The rationale
is that parents spend more time with their children than early interventionists and
should take an active role in the interventions, not just turn their children over to
the specialists. Parents have many more opportunities to influence their children’s
learning and development, and involvement in their children’s programs expands
their knowledge of and skills in specific ways for their individual child (Mahoney &
Wiggers, 2007; Turnbull, Turbiville, & Turnbull, 2000).
when the professional thinks families are wrong or misguided, even if research backs
up the professional. Consider this quote from Asa Hilliard III (2007):
The great error in behavioral research, now acknowledged by prestigious schol-
ars, is that in most cases there has been a failure to take context into account.
Research tends to proceed as if constructs, methods, instruments, and interpreta-
tions in culturally embedded studies are universal. Nothing could be further from
the truth. Most researchers are ill prepared to do research in a culturally plural
environment or to deal with hegemony as it relates to culture.
Rogoff sees that the theories of development studied by teachers and human
development specialists have particular ways of regarding development and goals
to aim for that reflect the values of the culture of those who create the theories. Not
coincidentally, those values usually relate to the developmental theorists own life.
(2003, p. 18). Most human development theorists come from a strong literacy back-
ground and therefore have held literacy as the hallmark of a successful outcome of
development. Piaget, a scientist and thinker, saw the development of reason as the
ultimate outcome of development. From these theorists’ points of view, it’s easy to
see societies as primitive when they don’t hold these same values or visions.
Hilliard (2004) also has a concern about how the lens of culture is often left out
of what he calls mainstream psychology. Though he’s looking at the field of psychol-
ogy rather than human development, the two fields overlap in many places. Hilliard
observed that mainstream psychology rarely shows any academic or scientific expertise
in culture. In fact, according to Hilliard, many scholars seem to believe that cultural
diversity matters are “more political than scientific.” He went on to say that
Check Your there is real resistance among many traditional psychologists to engage in the
Understanding 1.3 required scientific study and dialogue about these cultural matters. “Their cul-
Click here to check your tural naiveté is almost legendary.” When one looks through a cultural lens, one
understanding of the history of
sees sets of realities that are different from what has been analyzed and studied
family-centered care and education.
in the name of psychology and human development.
theory, she used an analogy of the human body—that any surgeon who studies medi-
cine can operate on any human in the world because the organs are the same. The
theory behind family systems theory is that families may be very different in many ways,
but they all have some things in common and that is that they are governed by systems.
One such system is communication, and another is rules. All families communicate
with each other. How and to what extent differs, but communication is a given. All fami-
lies have rules—what they are and how they are carried out is different for each family.
The lens of family systems theory puts the focus on the way the family works
rather than on the behavior of any individual in it (Parke & Buriel, 2006). That makes
the focus of the family therapist different from that of traditional therapists who work
only with individuals. Family members are connected to each other; each one influ-
ences the others, and all are influenced by the family system. Understanding those
influences and the shifts that take place when changes occur in the family is what
guides family therapists. Educators aren’t therapists and shouldn’t be doing therapy.
Their job isn’t to diagnose family problems and fix them. Still, educators can find
family systems theory useful to further their understandings of how the systems work
in each family. Think of the theory as a framework for understanding in a deeper way.
Even though the systems themselves may be the same, they can vary greatly
from one family to another in the way they operate. It’s also useful to realize that
changes, even small ones, can affect the system and the individuals in it. When edu-
cators look at a child through a family system lens, they realize that they can’t work
on behavior changes in children all by themselves, because those children are part
of family systems. I think back to times I’ve been in teacher meetings where a child’s
challenging behavior is being discussed. A missing ingredient of these discussions
was the family’s involvement.
Linda Garris Christian (2006) in her article about family systems and their
relevance to early educators lists six systems that are useful to understand when
working with families. The systems are: boundaries, roles, rules, hierarchy, climate,
and equilibrium (see Figure 1.3). She says that all families have these systems, but
they look very different from one family to another.
Take boundaries, for example, which relate to limits, togetherness, and
separateness—what or who is in or out of the family. I remember an exercise from
a workshop I attended where the group was asked by the facilitator to think about
the family they grew up in. She asked how many grew up in a large family. When par-
ticipants raised their hands, she then questioned them about how they defined a
large family and who was in it. Their answers reflected differences in boundaries. One
person counted 50 people in her family. She included blood relatives and close o
thers.
Her family might have been called a kinship network by some. Another had an even
Boundaries
Roles
Rules
Hierarchy
Climate
Equilibrium
larger family, and she included people who were no longer alive. Another person who
came from a large family numbered six in her family—herself, her parents, and her
three siblings. The boundaries in the families of the first two participants were much
looser than those of the third participant as determined by the definition of family
members—who was included and who was not.
How emotionally and psychologically close family members are to each other
is a nother part of boundaries. In families where the priority is raising children to be
more independent than interdependent, the boundaries are different from those fami-
lies where interdependence is a top priority. Christian uses the term enmeshed to label
families who are extremely interdependent. I bristled at that word. It seemed judgmen-
tal to me. My experience with people I have known who come from families a therapist
labeled enmeshed is that they emerged from therapy convinced they had “boundary issues”
because they weren’t closer to the middle of the boundaries continuum. Disengaged is
the term Christian used for the families on the other end of the continuum. Just think-
ing about the cross-cultural views of boundaries in my own family gives me pause. If
my mother and mother-in-law had studied to be family systems therapists, I’m pretty
sure that my mother would have labeled my mother-in-law’s family as “enmeshed” and
my mother-in-law would have called my mother “disengaged.” Having been part of both
those families now for a number of years, I think both labels are too harsh. Certainly, put-
ting on a cross-cultural lens makes a difference in how one views family boundaries that
don’t fit one’s own ideas and experiences.
A danger of using the family systems theory is the temptation to play therapist.
Another danger is judging other people’s family systems without regard to your own.
Obviously early educators are the product of some kind of family systems, and just
as we have to understand our own cultures, we have to understand our own fam-
ily systems so we can stop just looking outward. “Know thyself,” said Shakespeare.
That’s the lesson here.
Understanding and working with family systems theory is a much bigger and
more complex job than just focusing on caring for and educating the developing
child. But taking a family-centered approach is more complicated, too. The chal-
lenges are great, but the rewards are as well.
All of these mandates to deal with the huge complexity in the program; the
child, the family, and the community may seem overwhelming! I have warned more
than once to be cautious. Perhaps my warnings are too strong and early educators
will put aside who they are and what they know so they can just focus on opening
up their minds to what the families they work with know. So at this point, it needs
to be said that early childhood educators also have the responsibility to share their
professional knowledge and personal beliefs with the families. This may be harder in
a cross-cultural context and may take more sensitivity than when working with one’s
“own people.” Nevertheless, information sharing has to be a two-way street.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.