Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feasibility of Establishment of "Dry Ports" in The Developing Countries-The Case of Iran
Feasibility of Establishment of "Dry Ports" in The Developing Countries-The Case of Iran
net/publication/225109362
CITATIONS READS
17 5,272
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Seyedehsan Dadvar on 14 August 2015.
Abstract The main purpose of this research is to evaluate potential benefits and
impacts of Dry ports for different kinds of stakeholders, which may lead to establish
“Dry ports”. Dry ports are intermodal inland terminals which have been established
in several countries. In this paper, we designed a methodological approach with
these steps: a) Comprehensive literature review, b) Definition of “Base Case” for Dry
ports with required features, c) Comparative study and analysis, d) Questionnaires, e)
Analysis of answered questionnaires, and f) SWOT matrix. By means of this
framework, dry ports, intermodal transportation and containerization are investigated
through experts’ point of views. Iran is chosen as a case study, as a developing country.
This study is based upon yearly information and statistics of the country.
Introduction
In the middle of 1950s, container was introduced into freight transportation and it
has had revolutionary effect on international economy and trade since then and
within the last 20 years the rate of container utilization has been increased. It became
doubled from 1990 to 1998 and reached 175.000.000 TEU (Ioannou and Chassiakos
S. R. S. Ganji (*)
Department of Transportation Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Tehran, Iran
e-mail: r.alizadehganji@gmail.com
E. Dadvar et al.
2002). This rate is still increasing. According to the increment of capacity and size of
container ships which nowadays can carry on more than 12.000–15.000 TEU, and
the continuous growth of container transportation in the entire world, there are
critical needs to manage and handle properly with so much freight which are carried
to the seaports, loaded or unloaded and at last forwarded or received to/from main
destinations or origins. As maritime containerized transport continues to increase,
functional seaport inland access is important for the efficiency of the transportation
chain as a whole. Inland intermodal terminals are important nodes in the transport
network and have attracted considerable attention (Roso 2007). Lack of space at
seaport terminals and growing congestion on the access routes serving their
terminals are the main problems seaports face today, as container transport volume
continues to grow. The potential growth of container flows is modelled and
simulated by Parola and Sciomachen (Parola and Sciomachen 2005) and their
findings show that the modal imbalance results in increased road traffic congestion,
since a growth in the sea flow implies an almost proportional increase in the road
flow. According to the authors, the strategic decision would be the implementation
of rail or improved inland intermodal terminals serving seaports (Roso and Lumsden
2009). One of the feasible and successful solutions is “Dry Ports” or “Inland Ports”.
Literature review
Problem description
The container throughput of Shahid Rajaie port, as the biggest container port of Iran,
reached 2.200.000 TEU in 2009 and it ranked as the 60th container port in the world
[www.cargosystems.net]. According to this growth rate in recent years and various
estimations, along with physical expansions of container terminals in pre-defined
phases (3.000.000 TEUs for the first finished phase and expected 5 to 6.5 millions
TEU for the second ongoing phase (Domestic Various Related Statistics and
Information 2006–2008)) will result in the growth of inland container transportation.
Figure 1 illustrates some parts of T2 container terminal in this port
Due to long time period of storing containers in this port in comparison to the
standard time periods (27 days instead of 3–5 days (Domestic Various Related
Statistics and Information 2006–2008)) and regarding the conventional inland
container transportation in Iran, handled with road vehicles almost more than 90%,
(which is usually performed in a single-way), as well as more fuel consumption, air
pollution, noises, accidents and road congestion which are almost the main problems
in the developing countries for inland container transportation, one of the successful
solutions with so many experiments all around the world is implementation of dry
port or “Inland Logistics Port”. In this paper, we have introduced this concept, and
investigated its feasibility, main characteristics, requirements and obstacles.
Methodology
1
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT)
E. Dadvar et al.
The main problems seaports face today, due to growing containerised transport, are lack
of space or inappropriate inland access set in a conventional way. Conventional hinterland
transport is based upon numerous links by road and a few by rail (Roso et al. 2006).
There are some denotations for dry ports:
“A Dry Port is an inland intermodal terminal directly connected to a seaport,
with high capacity of traffic modes, where customers can leave/collect their
goods in intermodal loading units, as if directly to the seaport (Roso et al.
2006).”
Or
“Dry ports are located inland from seaports but are linked directly to the
seaport(s) or, in the case of international land movements, are in contact with
the sources of imports and destination of exports. Dry ports may be used
whether a country has seaports or is land-locked, but only surface modes of
transport are involved in giving access to them (UNCTAD 1991).”
One of the main classifications of dry ports can be done based upon the function and
location of them as mentioned before in literature review. They can be categorized as
distant, midrange, and close dry port. In Figure 3 all categories of dry ports has been
shown in comparison with conventional hinterland transport.
The main potential benefits of dry ports maybe summarised as follows (FDT 2007;
UNCTAD 1991):
◦ Increased trade flows,
◦ Expanding existing seaport capacity,
◦ Lower door-to-door freight rates,
◦ Reducing total transport expenses,
◦ Optimal use of road and rail transport,
◦ Better utilization of capacity,
◦ Greater use of containers,
◦ Benefits of shuttle trains, and
◦ Reducing environmental problems and air pollution.
Figure 3 Comparison between conventional hinterland transport and an implemented 3 types of dry port
concept (Roso et al. 2006)
E. Dadvar et al.
Questionnaires analysis
Respecting Figure 5, the necessity of dry ports in Iran is “High”. On the other hand,
growth rate of containerized freights and container transportation throughput of
Shahid Rajaie port, both estimated “High”, too. Thus paying attention to the
development of required infrastructures is necessary.
The most important impacts and benefits which may occur are:
◦ Reduction in road traffic congestion and development of rail transportation (as
illustrated in Figure 6),
◦ Increment of employment, and
◦ Removing irrelevant operations from seaports.
10 to 20
48%
Feasibility of establishment of “Dry Ports”
High
60%
Regarding the respondents’ ideas, the main impediments of dry port implementation
in Iran are:
◦ Inconsistency among several different but exactly related sectors and organizations
(as illustrated in Figure 7),
◦ Changes in governmental policies and decisions,
◦ Bureaucracy, and
◦ Interfering of benefits of different parts of transportation chain.
High
46%
E. Dadvar et al.
High
45%
Comparative analysis
In this section, we first determined the “Base Case” for a dry port by means of
comprehensive case studies which we had, secondly, we took a brief look on
domestic experiments and finally, we studied some aspects of related fields to dry
ports implementation and required infrastructures in Iran as a developing country.
Nowadays there are so many dry ports in several countries which have an important
role in improvement and development of container transportation and strengthening
of logistics. There are different types of dry ports in Australia, Belgium, Cambodia,
Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Italy, Kenya,
Midrange
48%
Feasibility of establishment of “Dry Ports”
Pakistan, Spain, Swaziland, Sweden, Tanzania, UAE, UK, and USA. One of the
main benefits of dry ports is the possibility of having access to marine transportation
for the land-locked countries, for example there are some plans for developing a dry
port in Lesotho.
Based on different case studies, the most important structural and functional
features of a sample dry port as “Base case” are:
◦ Inland intermodal terminal (at least 2 different modes of transportation) and
different distances from seaport(s),
◦ Shuttle rail connection with seaport(s) (at least once per day),
◦ Appropriate access to origins and destinations of main nodes of freights,
◦ Handling equipment for different types of containers,
◦ Customs clearance and control,
◦ Intermodal container transportation services with required bills of lading,
◦ Causing to lower transportation time and cost (even in such as very short distances
(Roso 2008)),
◦ Ownership and management are usually assigned to seaports, public and private
rail companies, municipalities of adjacent cities,
◦ Some other value-added services, and
◦ Adequate marketing in its region.
Domestic experiments
There is not any active “Dry Port” in Iran. Albeit Iranian National Railway Company
owns 3 intermodal stations which could be used as intermodal nodes between rail
and road modes (Domestic Various Related Statistics and Information 2006–2008).
These stations are shown in Figure 9.
Aprin terminal
This railway station is located 21 km south-west of Tehran (the capital of Iran) and it
is at an appropriate position of north-south and east-west corridors of railway
network. This site is also accessible by several national highways. The site area is
about 700 ha and the former planned projects aimed to construct 110 storage blocks
on it. If this site is activated as a dry port, it might serve Tehran, industrial zones
surroundings as well as the north of country. But the main problems and
impediments of this around 30 years continuous-unsuccessful project are customs
clearance, poor railway services, networks, fees and so on (Domestic Various
Related Statistics and Information 2006–2008).
Sarakhs terminal
With reference to comparative statistics, the situation of rail and road networks
are considered in Table 1. By paying attention to Table 1, it is clearly obvious
that there is not suitable rail network which is one of the most important factors
of implementation of dry ports in Iran. Improvement and expansion of both
rail and road networks must be considered in short/mid/long period national
projects.
There are also poorly recorded data about these topics. In the rail transportation,
there are to pre and end—road haulage which usually results in more time
consumption and also extra cost in comparison with still easier road direct
transportation. There is another critical problem in the majority of rail trips which
rail wagons still cannot handle 2 FEU together (i.e. the possibilities are 1 TEU+1
FEU or 3 TEU).
The average container trip time from Shahid Rajaie port to some different
destinations by means of rail and road transportation has been shown in Table 2. In
all routes, the situation of road transport is better than rail transportation.
In the monitoring process, rail transport references to www.rai.ir claims that it
is supposed to be updated every 20 minutes, however it does not seem to be
correct. Therefore there is not a reliable trip for customers. Furthermore, road
transport references to: www.itair.com seems to have a better situation. It is also
possible for customers to monitor their commodities by direct contact with truck
drivers.
Table 1 Comparative statistics of rail and road networks of Iran (Domestic Various Related Statistics and
Information 2006–2008).
Table 2 Comparative trip time between rail and road transportation in Iran (Domestic Various Related
Statistics and Information 2006–2008).
Origin Destination Rail distance Rail trip time Road distance Road trip time
(km) (day) (km) (day)
As we mentioned, the Aprin terminal has been faced so many regulation problems to
form as a dry port for 3 decades. One of the most important of them is customs
clearance problem. As we detailed in the “Base Case”, it is one of the most
important factors to transform a simple inland terminal into a dry port. But, because
of unconscious policies, this problem still remains as a major impediment for such a
suitable site like Aprin terminal (Different Interviews Performed with Several
Related Experts 2009).
On the other hand, some other customs clearance problems also exist for inland
customs stations. For example, although there is a bonded warehouse in Sirjan free
trade zone (where can be considered as a shadow port for Shahid Rajaie port in the
midrange distance in its hinterland) in Kerman province, there are not some special
commodities allowable to sent or receive, however, they are allowable in the border
stations. It seems there are critical needs to re-organize or re-regulate customs basic
rules (Different Interviews Performed With Several Related Experts 2009).
Potential markets
Besides the political issues and problems, Iran has a strategic position in the middle-
east. In comparison with such countries as Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE,
some of which have better container throughput (e.g. Dubai and Sallaleh container
ports), Iran has better potential hinterland and markets. 12 out of the world’s 30 land-
locked countries are in the ESCAP region, 8 of which including Afghanistan,
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and
Uzbekistan are accessible through Iran (UNESCAP 2008). Furthermore, Russia
and countries of north Europe can be considered as potential markets, too. So with
more concentration on transportation efficiencies such as dry ports, more
involvement and development will be achieved for Iran.
SWOT analysis
We considered:
– Strengths: attributes of the dry port those are helpful to achieving the objective.
– Weaknesses: attributes of the dry port those are harmful to achieving the
objective.
– Opportunities: external conditions those are helpful to achieving the objective.
– Threats: external conditions which could do damage to the performance of dry
port.
The results are shown in Table 3.
Conclusion
References
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2007) South Florida Inland Port Feasibility Study, June
Chang H-H, Huang W-C (2006) Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method, Mathematical
and Computer Modelling, 43
Feasibility of establishment of “Dry Ports”