Applied Brand Management

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 28

DR TRIPARNA GANDHI

LECTURE 2
BRAND EQUITY
§ Equity – Fair/Even
§ Law – Justice
§ Finance – Value
§ Marketing (BM) – Value

§ Key: Outcome of Comparison


§ Equity is a differential effect of comparison

§ Brand Equity = Brand – Commodity


§ Value of the brand
§ Negative or Positive
$5.00 $10.00
0 0
E , 0
RE 0 0
F , 0
$4
• Three distinct concepts
• Financial Brand Equity: Differential effect of brand on balance sheet of owner
• Employer Brand Equity: Differential effect of brand on current / potential employee
• Customer-based Brand Equity: Differential effect of brand on current/potential customer
“If this business were to be split up, I
would be glad to take the brands,
trademarks and goodwill and you
could have all the bricks and mortar -
and I would fare better than you.”

John Stuart
Chairman of Quaker (ca. 1900)
§ The differential effect
that brand knowledge has on consumer
response to the marketing of that brand (Keller 2013).

§ Approaches brand equity from the perspective of the consumer

§ Stresses
that the power of a brand lies in what resides in the minds
and hearts of customers
Brand Awareness

Brand Image
§ Awareness
§ Recall/Recognition
§ Top of Mind Awareness (TOMA)
§ Unaided
§ Aided
Strength of • More deeply a person thinks about
product information and relates it to
Brand existing brand knowledge, stronger
Associations is the resulting brand association

Favorability • Is higher when a brand possesses


of Brand relevant attributes and benefits that
Associations satisfy consumer needs and wants

Uniqueness of • “Unique selling proposition” of the


product
Brand • Provides brands with sustainable
Associations competitive advantage
Relationship

Associations

Awareness

Resonance Pyramid (Keller 2013)


Relationship

Associations
“head” “heart”

Awareness

Resonance Pyramid (Keller 2013)


Brand Salience

Breadth and Depth


of Awareness

Product Category
Structure
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education
Brand Performance

¨ Describes how well the brand:


¤ Meets customers’ more functional needs
¤ Rate on objective assessments of quality

¤ Satisfies utilitarian, aesthetic, and economic


customer needs and wants in the product or service
category

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


Brand Imagery
¨ User profile/imagery
¨ Brand personality and values
¨ Purchase and usage situations/imagery
¨ Brand history, heritage, and experiences

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


Brand Judgements
¨ Quality
¨ Credibility
¨ Consideration
¨ Superiority

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


Brand Feelings

¨ Customers’ emotional responses and reactions to


the brand
¨ Relate to the social currency evoked by the
brand
¨ Feelings can be:
¤ Experiential and immediate, increasing in level of
intensity
¤ Private and enduring, increasing in level of gravity

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


Brand Resonance
¨ Behavioural loyalty
¨ Attitudinal attachment
¨ Sense of community
¨ Active engagement

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


CBBE & Resonance

Resonance Pyramid (Keller 2013)

Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education


BUILDING BRAND EQUITY: BRAND POSITINIONG
READ CHAPTER 3 (KELLER AND SWAMINATHAN 2019)

You might also like