Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economy
Economy
The year 2017 started on a positive note. Economy was growing, inflation was low, the rupee
was stable, CPEC was progressing, Pakistan’s credit rating had improved, and the stock market
was racing. There was hope for better times.
Political chaos hit the economy, and hit it hard. The chaos gained momentum with the formation
of the Panama case JIT in April and then culminated with the Islamabad sit-in by a faction of the
religious right in November.
The prolonged chaos changed the once hopeful sentiment. The economic narrative shifted to
fiscal deficit, trade deficit, rising debt, setbacks for CPEC, an overvalued rupee, and a sliding
stock market. Pessimism sidelined hope.
IMF’s Article IV Consultation had a similar view: “Pakistan’s outlook for economic growth is
favourable, with real GDP estimated at 5.3pc in FY 2016/17 and strengthening to 6pc.”
The State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) State of the Economy also agreed: “The real GDP growth in
FY17 was the highest during the last ten years. It was led by a rebound in agriculture and a
broad-based increase in value addition by services sector.”
That surely does not mean that the price level of essential goods is within the reach of common
Pakistanis. What it means is that these essentials did not move much further out of their reach.
Inflation was contained thanks to factors like lower international petroleum prices, which have
begun to rise, and a stable Pakistani rupee, which has started to weaken. However, according
SBP, in 2017-18, “overall inflation is expected to remain well below the target of 6pc.”
The compound annual growth rate for the population since 1998 turns out to be 2.4pc, well
above the global average. Female population is 101.3 million or 48.76pc.
The share of population of Punjab and Sindh decreased while that of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
and Balochistan has increased.
According to the Word Bank, Pakistan is the sixth most populous country following China,
India, USA, Indonesia and Brazil.
The credibility of economic data in Pakistan in general has long been subject to debate. But the
unemployment number stands out because of the incredulity surrounding it.
The army of applicants applying for every advertised job in 2017 surely does not suggest
unemployment is low. In one of its report, marketing research firm Nielsen puts
the employment rate at 51pc, leaving the unemployment rate much higher.
Following the disqualification and resignation of prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the embattled
finance minister Ishaq Dar has taken leave of absence.
The office of secretary finance and chairman of FBR changed incumbents. A new governor
assumed office at SBP, and an acting chairman was appointed at Securities and Exchange
Commission Pakistan (SECP) after the former chairman was suspended in the “record
tampering” case.
It has been a surreal experience watching all the key policy makers get replaced in a matter of
months. The economic challenges were mounting, the economic leadership was conspicuous by
its absence, and no one was counting the cost of political uncertainty.
CPEC dominates economic discourse
There are great expectations from CPEC and they keep becoming greater. The seventh round of
the CPEC Joint Cooperation Council took place in Islamabad in November.
According to the official announcements regarding the long-term plan, “By 2025, the CPEC
building shall be basically done, the industrial system approximately complete, major
economic functions brought into play in a holistic way, the people’s livelihood along the CPEC
significantly improved, regional development more balanced and all the goals of Vision
2025 achieved.”
The largest sector under CPEC is energy, where shortages have long been the bane of our
economy. The government is now examining a proposal to replace the US dollar with the
Chinese yuan for trade between China and Pakistan.
All, however, is not reported to be well with CPEC. There have been news items about potential
setbacks with calls for greater transparency.
The World Bank’s Migration and Development Brief says that Pakistan had witnessed 12pc
growth in remittances in 2015, which moderated to about 2.8pc in 2016 and is expected to grow
by a meagre 1.4pc in 2017.
SBP’s forecast for remittances for the current fiscal year is between $19 and $20 billion.
A report published in 2017 by the US State Department says that terror in Pakistan is on the
decline. A publicly available data set says that fatalities from terror incidents were 1209 in 2017,
down from 1803 in 2016.
If critics are to be believed, the government is now set to miss all the major budget
targets including the GDP growth of 6pc, containing budget deficit of 4.1pc, and increasing tax- -
to-GDP ratio of 13.7pc.
While details about the wrong doings remained sketchy, HBL agreed to pay a fine of $225
million. It is a huge amount, but still less than half the $630 million that the US authorities had
reportedly assessed.
There has been ongoing speculation as to whether Pakistan would return to borrowing from IMF
and face the painful adjustments. The government sought to buy time by raising
As per the Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Pakistan may run dry by 2025 if
the present conditions continue. In another report by Institute of Public Policy, there are five
challenges on the supply side: water scarcity resulting from higher demand and diminishing
capacity of reservoirs, excessive conveyance losses, deteriorating infrastructure, high operation
costs and an excessive groundwater use.
The Supreme Court called upon the chief ministers of Sindh and Punjab expressing concern over
the lack of availability of potable water.
We are talking about less than 1,000 people and just about Rs1 crore in the whole country. But
the media outcry it generated was indeed huge.
On the bright side, the media outcry created more awareness about cyber crime than the National
Response Centre for Cyber Crime under the FIA could ever expect to achieve through its
awareness activities.
Be it any party or the parliament, the judiciary, the army, or the media, all have suffered
reputational damage during 2017. But there has been one clear loser: Pakistan.
Dirty politics trumped development economics in 2017. It could have been a much better year
for Pakistan’s economy, but it was not.