Title: Mastering Your Thesis: Navigating the Complexities of Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Embarking on the journey of writing a thesis is no small feat. It requires dedication, meticulous
research, and an in-depth understanding of the chosen topic. Among the many challenging subjects
to delve into, the intersection of Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror stands out as particularly
complex and multifaceted.

The concept of Habeas Corpus, a fundamental legal principle dating back centuries, ensures that
individuals have the right to challenge their unlawful detention or imprisonment. However, in the
context of the War on Terror, this principle has been significantly tested and often compromised in
the name of national security.

Exploring this intricate relationship demands a deep dive into legal frameworks, historical precedents,
political motivations, and ethical considerations. As such, crafting a thesis that effectively analyzes
and dissects these complex dynamics requires expertise and precision.

Countless hours of rigorous research, critical analysis, and thoughtful synthesis are essential to
produce a thesis that not only meets academic standards but also contributes meaningfully to the
discourse surrounding Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror.

For those navigating the daunting task of writing such a thesis, seeking expert guidance and support
can make all the difference. That's where ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ comes in.

⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers professional assistance tailored to the specific needs of thesis writers
grappling with intricate subjects like Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. With a team of
experienced writers and researchers versed in legal studies, political science, and related fields, ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ provides invaluable support every step of the way.

From formulating a compelling thesis statement to conducting comprehensive literature reviews and
crafting cohesive arguments, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ equips students with the tools and insights
necessary to excel in their academic endeavors.

Don't let the complexities of your thesis topic overwhelm you. Trust ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ to
guide you through the process with expertise and efficiency. Order your custom thesis assistance
today and embark on the path to academic success.
Primary sources compiled by experts in the area of study Secondary sources based on research in
primary sources Credible sources (experts in study) Relevant research (materials are pertinent towards
the section of study) Peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts
within the relevant field of study). By Day 7, respond to at least two of your classmates' initial posts.
Your peer. According to Sir William Blackstone, an outstanding English lawman, the habeas corpus
was first applied by the court in 1305 (Schultz, 2009). Nonetheless, the Court interpreted the
Suspension Clause as having full effect at Guantanamo. Congress could specify that U.S. citizens
captured in the context of the armed conflict against terrorist organizations be subject to trial in U.S.
court for treason or a violation of any other statute, or prescribe procedures for determining whether
U.S. citizens are subject to detention as enemy belligerents, if constitutional, but it has not done so.
As a result, the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror continues to be in force and
effect. It's like a masterclass to be explored at your own pace. Any new detainees that might be
transported to Guantanamo Bay would go before a CSRT. It remains to be seen whether the
appellate court will reaffirm its earlier ruling regarding the Constitution's application to detainees
held at Guantanamo, or whether the issue will even be reached by the court. In a 5-4 opinion
authored by Justice Kennedy, the Court reversed the D.C. Circuit and held that petitioners had a
constitutional right to habeas that was withdrawn by the 2006 MCA in violation of the Constitution's
Suspension Clause. 207 Constitutional Right to Habeas. Lee “It is a good thing war is so terrible; else
we should grow too fond of it” -- R.E. Lee Brilliant southern gentleman from one of country’s
oldest families Offered command of Union armies Family plantation occupied early in the war and
turned into Arlington National Cemetery So how did it begin. As he was detained wrongfully by B
(police officer), the writ of habeas corpus can be filed in court by A’s family on his behalf. Habeas
Corpus Introduction The term Habeas Corpus is a writ, which is mainly used as a jurisdiction in
federal court. This was when the confederates snuck up on the union and they won over fort Sumter.
In this manner, the judiciary is using this writ in such an effective manner in order to ensure security
to a person from unlawful confinement. In February 2009, a D.C. Circuit panel held in the case of
Kiyemba v. In 2009, Congress enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (2009 MCA) as part
of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2010 ( P.L. 111-84 ). The 2009 MCA modified
many of the rules for military commissions to make them more closely resemble those used in courts-
martial proceedings, 141 but made only minor modifications to existing laws concerning court
jurisdiction to adjudicate claims raised by detainees. The concept of habeas corpus, English in origin,
literally means that “you have the body,” which means that the court is capable of forcing the police
into producing a prisoner before them to review their case (Clark, 2008). Citizenship- must be a
citizen of the U.S.A for seven years. The Uighurs filed habeas petitions with the U.S. District Court
for D.C., and requested that they be released into the United States pending the court's final
judgment on their habeas petitions. Though the writ has the probable chance of getting suspended, it
also has the probability of getting reinforced with the influence of the respective government. The
explanation of the evolution of habeas corpus within the English tradition is based on the adoption of
the English common law. Magna Carta-1215 trial by jury due process private property. It has been
weakened by the overzealous prosecution of enemy combatants and praised by individuals who are
seeking to suspend or evade it. Georgia (1978) Unanimous versus Nonunanimous Verdicts. It is
unclear how much of a role CSRT proceedings will play in habeas cases or whether courts will
abstain from hearing cases that have not yet received a CSRT ruling (should such a case occur). It
has its origin in the English common law in the 14th century. Does this obligation extend to all 9 fed
power categories. The immediate impact of the Boumediene decision is that detainees at
Guantanamo may petition a federal district court for habeas review of the legality and possibly the
circumstances of their detention, perhaps including challenges to the jurisdiction of military
commissions. In June 2008, a three-judge panel for the D.C. Circuit ruled in the case of Parhat v.
If the detention is not supported by law, the detainee is to be released. 251 Minor irregularities in
trial procedures that do not amount to violations of fundamental constitutional rights are generally to
be addressed on direct appeal. 252. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA or 2006 MCA)
authorized the trial of certain detainees by military commission and prescribed detailed rules to
govern their procedures. 140 The 2006 MCA also amended the DTA provisions regarding appellate
review and habeas corpus jurisdiction. All the efforts made in order to trace him turned out to be
futile. In this manner, the judiciary is using this writ in such an effective manner in order to ensure
security to a person from unlawful confinement. CSRT proceedings are modeled on the procedures
of Army Regulation (AR) 190-8, Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and
Other Detainees (1997), which establishes administrative procedures to determine the status of
detainees under the Geneva Conventions and prescribes their treatment in accordance with
international law. We the people To form a more perfect union establish justice. The following
sections provide a brief background of habeas corpus in the United States, outline some proposals for
responding to the Boumediene holding, and discuss relevant constitutional considerations. The
petitioners sought to have the court adopt rules similar to what the district court had ordered when
the cases were before it on petitions of habeas corpus. In January 2010, a D.C. Circuit panel held in
the case of Al-Bihani v. The majority also found that aliens held at Guantanamo were not protected
by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, and the district court's order therefore could not be
based upon a liberty interest owed to the petitioners under the Constitution. US Constitution.
Written in 1787 We now have the longest lasting Constitution of any nation Our constitution has
been changing over the years Two ways for constitutional change Formal Informal. Career criminal
sentenced to two consecutive life sentences for. In Latin, habeas corpus literally means “you shall
have the body.”. Anthony Gregory here does the estimable service of showing that the Great Writ
was not always what we now understand it to be. These two categories of challenges may involve
different procedural routes and the application of different constitutional rights. It's like a masterclass
to be explored at your own pace. However, in the mid 14th century, after the judicial rivalry, the
general purpose of habeas corpus was entirely changing. The action begged the meaning of civil
liberty and the relevance. Additionally for your needed course text, you’ll need a minimum of seven
professional scholarly sources, three which should be peer reviewed journal articles in the Ashford
Online Library. Moreover, there can be no doubt that the President's power to act at a time of armed
conflict is at its strongest when Congress has specifically authorized the President to act. American
national government plays a crucial role in examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on
terror. More often, a state court’s decision will properly recite the applicable doctrine and the
prisoner ’s complaint will be about the doctrine’s application to the facts. C). In this regard, one of
the perspectives can be ascertained as the role play by the President as Commander-in-Chief in
determining the rights of habeas corpus. However, there are also some cases challenging the
conditions under which a detainee is being held. Bicameral Upper: Senate Lower: House of
Representatives Makes law. Graham, passed by roll call vote, 49 - 42), as amended by S.Amdt. 2524,
151 Cong. Rec. S12771 (daily ed. November 14, 2005). It has been weakened by the overzealous
prosecution of enemy combatants and praised by individuals who are seeking to suspend or evade it.
Post, October 20, 2006, at A18 (reporting notice submitted by Justice Department to courts of
intention to move for dismissal of pending enemy combatant cases). Courts that have considered the
Executive's authority to detain under the AUMF and law of war have reached differing conclusions
as to the scope of this detention authority. Congratulations! You have successfully registered for the
webinar.
The government sought to establish rules restricting scope of discovery and attorney-client
communication to what it viewed as the proper scope of the court's review, that is, the CSRT
proceedings. The plan of the government was to prevent the application of. The writ of Habeas
corpus cum causa is an order calling upon the person who has detained another person, to present the
person in the court and justify his actions that on what grounds and under what authority he has
confined that person. Fourth Amendment. People are protected against unreasonable searches and
seizures. Obama, 2010 WL 811280, 2010 WL 811282, No. 05-280 (D.D.C. Mar. 10, 2010 ) (denying
habeas petition by two detainees in separate orders). The term habeas corpus is the Latin word which
means to bring or present the body before the court. The other perspective can be ascertained as the
initiative taken by Congress in passing laws, making impossible for the detainees to make petition for
the writ. Spendthrift Farm, 514 U.S. 211, 225 (Congress may not disturb final court rulings). In
January 2009, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the judicial review system established under by the DTA
had been effectively nullified by the Supreme Court's ruling in Boumediene, meaning that detainees
could only challenge the legality of their confinement via habeas corpus review. Issuu turns PDFs
and other files into interactive flipbooks and engaging content for every channel. In June 2008, a
three-judge panel for the D.C. Circuit ruled in the case of Parhat v. Necessary cookies are absolutely
essential for the website to function properly. While the United States is not party to Protocol I, the
plurality noted that many authorities regard it as customary international law. Battle Of Bull Run.
There were two battles of Bull Run. Are state courts as likely to uphold fed rights or any right in
particular. The thesis statement must tell readers exactly what the essay demonstrates. Computer
Systems: Hardware and Software Programming Languages What Is a Program Made Of. More
Features Connections Canva Create professional content with Canva, including presentations,
catalogs, and more. We use cookies to create the best experience for you. American national
government plays a crucial role in examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror.
Rapp, Director of the Joint Intelligence Task Force for Combating Terrorism). Urbina found that the
government had no authority to detain the petitioners and ordered their release into the United
States, 192 at least until they may be transferred to a third country. While prior jurisprudence
recognized that prisoners are generally required to exhaust alternative remedies before seeking
federal habeas relief, the Court found that petitioners in the instant case were entitled to a prompt
habeas hearing, given the length of their detention. Although these challenges are often denied on the
merits or on procedural grounds, cases have been brought based on the First Amendment, 287 Sixth
Amendment, 288 Eighth Amendment 289 and various other grounds. 290. This writ is issued by the
higher court to review the actions of the lower court. The Court granted the government's request,
vacated the appellate court's earlier judgment, and transferred the case back to the lower court with
orders to dismiss it as moot. Khalid v. Bush 62. Throughout the discussion, it can be found that the
writ of habeas corpus may get suspended at the time of any invasion or rebellion. Justice Stevens,
joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Souter, further based their conclusion on the basis that
M.C.O. No. 1 did not meet all criteria of art. 75 of Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949,
adopted in 1977 (Protocol I). The suspension of habeas corpus can be applied to the present situation
because of the Constitution’s clauses that authorize the U.S. government to have power in terms of
the use of the habeas writ. Rather, the courts have looked to the language of the AUMF and other
legislation to determine the contours of presidential power.
The DTA also eliminated the federal courts' statutory jurisdiction over habeas claims by aliens
challenging their detention at Guantanamo Bay, but provided for limited appeals of status
determinations made pursuant to the DOD procedures for CSRTs, along with final decisions by
military commissions. Battle Of Bull Run. There were two battles of Bull Run. Obama, but changed
circumstances surrounding some of the petitioners resulted in the Court remanding the case back to
the D.C. Circuit for further consideration. In April 2009, a federal district court held that the
constitutional writ of habeas extended to at least some detainees held by the United States at the
Bagram Theater Internment Facility in Afghanistan. 325. Arizona (1969). Mapp v. Ohio (1961). Key
Question Assess the claim that the exclusionary rule helps ensure liberty and justice.. Constitutional
Issues. Adobe InDesign Design pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe
InDesign. For instance, this language might be seen as authorizing the President to issue regulations
to implement how agency personnel should comply with the Geneva Conventions, policies which
might otherwise be addressed at the agency level. He was a member of the us house of
representatives before he was president. Instead, the government argued that noncitizens detained at
Guantanamo are entitled to no constitutional protections, including the privilege of habeas corpus.
This blog does not establish an attorney-client privilege. Philippine History:The Philippine achieve
independence after ww2 to cory Aqu. Error: Try Again Ok Sell Watchlist Expand Watch List
Loading. Q3: What is the difference between Usuli and Faqih. Prior to the enactment of the DTA
provisions eliminating habeas review, the Justice Department argued primarily that Rasul v. Plant
along with the views from the four dissenting justices). Pre- Boumediene v. Bush Court Challenges
to the Detention Policy. The extent to which Congress may limit the scope of challenges
Guantanamo detainees may bring may turn on the unresolved question of which constitutional rights
apply to aliens detained in territory abroad. To form a more perfect Union Framers wanted a unified
nation E Pluribus Unum To establish justice Unified legal system applied fairly to all. Eisentrager 56
remained applicable to limit the relief to which the detainees may be entitled. United States 202 and
the 1950 Supreme Court case Johnson v. Obama, 590 F.3d 866, 875 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (2006 MCA
precluded petitioner from raising claim that government's failure to accord him prisoner of war status
violated Geneva Convention requirements). Among other things, the Court noted that unlike the
detainees in Eisentrager, the petitioners denied that they were enemy combatants, and the
government's control of the post-WWII, occupied German territory in which the Eisentrager
detainees were held was not nearly as significant nor secure as its control over the territory where
the petitioners are located. The book does not attempt to capture all of the complex doctrinal shifts in
habeas over the centuries. The government was initially unable to effectuate their transfer to a
country where they would not face a substantial risk of torture or persecution. The Court stressed,
however, that except in cases of undue delay, federal courts should generally refrain from
considering habeas petitions of detainees being held as enemy combatants until after the CSRT had
an opportunity to review their status. Writing for the majority of the panel, Judge Randolph stated
that federal courts lacked the authority to order a non-citizen detainee's entry and release into the
United States. Amendment IX (9). What is the term of the Justices of the Supreme Court?. LIFE.
Which amendment gives you the right to bear arms. The issue divided the Fourth Circuit, which
initially found in favor in the petitioner but then reversed en banc, only to have the Supreme Court
vacate the en banc opinion after the government charged the petitioner with a federal crime and
moved him into the ordinary criminal justice system. In the year 1679, the writ became the part of
the England Statutory law. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip
carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd.
A minimum of 20% from the essay must concentrate on subtopic 6, above (your look at arguments
concerning the subject). The prime intent of this writ is identified to work against random arrests and
conduct of extrajudicial murder as well as inhuman tortures. LexisNexis Academic: Law Reviews,
EBSCO host (accessed June 15, 2016). Bush (2008), the foreigners at Guantanamo Bay enjoyed the
right of habeas corpus, bringing their petition to the federal court (Neuman, 2010). After the Supreme
Court rejected the view that the DTA left it without jurisdiction to review a habeas challenge to the
validity of military commissions in the case of Hamdan v. The majority also found that aliens held at
Guantanamo were not protected by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, and the district
court's order therefore could not be based upon a liberty interest owed to the petitioners under the
Constitution. Causes Disagreement over the institution of slavery. Describe the five goals of
contemporary criminal sentencing Illustrate the difference between indeterminate and structured
sentencing Describe the different types of structured sentencing models in use today Define
mandatory sentencing. Instead, the government argued that noncitizens detained at Guantanamo are
entitled to no constitutional protections, including the privilege of habeas corpus. The report
summarizes the Supreme Court's decision in Boumediene invalidating Congress's efforts to revoke
the courts' habeas jurisdiction, and discusses some remaining issues and subsequent developments.
The Presidency was adopted by the U.S. Constitution that provides the application of the common
law practices, including the writ of habeas corpus. Embed Host your publication on your website or
blog with just a few clicks. Because the Supreme Court had granted certiorari on the understanding
that no remedy was available for the petitioners other than release into the United States, it returned
the case to the D.C. Circuit to review the ramifications of the new circumstances. 324 Litigation in
Kiyemba remains ongoing. However, there are also some cases challenging the conditions under
which a detainee is being held. Hamdi does not, however, provide a cookie-cutter procedure
appropriate for every alleged enemy-combatant, regardless of the circumstances of the alleged
combatant's seizure or the actual burdens the government might face in defending the habeas petition
in the normal way. 120. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors,
bounce rate, traffic source, etc. Therefore, it was argued, denying these persons access to habeas
review would not run afoul of the Suspension Clause. It demands lawful justification for the
detention and protects the person from any kind of ill-treatment and discrimination from the
authority which detained the person. The role of the Supreme Court in protecting civil liberties,
including the judicial philosophy which should guide the Court in this role The U.S. Supreme Court
holds that the privilege of habeas corpus permits the prisoner to have an opportunity to show that “he
is being held pursuant to the erroneous application or interpretation of relevant law” (Blum, 2008, p.
90). In the case of Boumediene v. Garrett, B. L. (2012). Habeas corpus and due process. Your
assessment should think about several perspectives about this subject, including: The function from
the President as commander-in-chief. Barack Obama. 219 years. 1. 2. US Constitution. Preamble:
intro that states the purpose of the US gov’t. September 17, 2013. ORIGINS of AMERICAN
GOVERNMENT. Throughout the discussion, it can be found that the writ of habeas corpus may get
suspended at the time of any invasion or rebellion. Embed Host your publication on your website or
blog with just a few clicks. Amendment IX (9). What is the term of the Justices of the Supreme
Court?. LIFE. Which amendment gives you the right to bear arms. Are state courts as likely to
uphold fed rights or any right in particular. The transferring judge will retain the case for all other
purposes, though Judge Hogan is to confer with those judges whose cases raise common substantive
issues, and he may address those issues with the consent of the transferring judge. The book is
getting great reviews.... Since most of us agree that an accused person should receive some form of
due process, how is it that we continue to see habeas rights erode.