PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE

(M4 to M6)
Date of Submission
1.0 EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Employee Name
Grade
Designation
Department
Qualification
Experience in Curreny Company (Years)
Total Experience
Break up of total experience (Name of Org.) From (Date) To (Date) Department Designation
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.0 RATING OF PERFORMANCE
Scale for Rating: 5 = Far Exceeds Expectation; 4 = Exceeds Expectation; 3 = Meets Expectation; 2 = Below Expectation; 1 =
Far Below Expectation
2.1 RATING OF OUTPUT(KRA Based)
Explanatory Note: Employee has to refer to a copy of the Goal Setting sheet filled up at the start of the year and fill in the Goal, target,
and weightage. Once actual figures are entered, employee has to comute the rating taking into account the standard mentioned in the
Goal Sheet. Then the weighted average is calculated. Needless to say, a copy of the goal sheet has to be attached here as a supporting
document for this calculation.

S.N Goals Scoring

(a)Target (b)Actual (c)Rating (d)Weight ( e)= (c)x(d)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(Total) ∑(d)= ∑(e)=

Rating(O) ∑(e) / ∑(d) =

Major Achivements:

Major Failures:
2.2 RATING OF BEHAVIOR
Explanatory Note: This section is about rating the behaviors that make output possible. Employee employee can fill in the Rating by
Self(Column a),Incase he/she wants to rate additional attributes fill in the blank rows.

SN Behavioral Attributes Needed for Success Rating

(c) Unit Head/

(b)Superior/ Sperior's
(a)Self HOD (d)Weight ( e)= (c)x(d)
Superior

1 Communication Skill: Can get across a message

clearly; connects with people; gets things done

2 Decision Making: Ability to take fact based

decisions

3 Discipline:Sticks to norms and rules despite

hardship; displays punctuality, orderliness,
accuracy with a quality first mindset

4 Drive & Initiative: Displays energy and pushes

self and others;does without waiting for
instruction

5 Leadership & Asseriveness: Able to motivate

people to willingly move towards the set goal(s);
clear about what he/she wants; willing to listen to
others to understand what they want; tries to
arrive at a win - win

6 Analytical Ability & Problem Solving: Ability to

analyze issues and situation using dispassionate
reasoning; able to involve the right resources and
draw out the root cause for failure and then
mitigate the same effectively

7 Planning & Prioritization: Set goals, determine

resources, provide contingency, check
dependencies and schedule; knows what should
be done first and why?

8 Emotional Intelligence:Able to sense and

regulate emotion in self; be self motivated; display
empathy; exhibit superior social skills

9 Teamwork:Participates willingly and cooperates

wholeheartedly with other members of the team
or members of other teams.; facilitates
teambuilding either as a member or leader of a
team

(Total) ∑(d)= ∑(e)=

Rating(B) ∑(e) / ∑(d) =

2.3 RATING OF TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
Explanatory Note: This section is about rating the technical /functional/domain attributes that help at work. Employee employee
should fill in the Rating by Self(Column a) Incase he/she wants to rate additional attributes fill in the blank rows.

SN Technical Attributes Needed for Success Rating

(b)Superior/ (c) Unit Head/

(a)Self HOD Sperior's (d)Weight ( e)= (c)x(d)
Superior

1 Process Knowledge(Theoretical)
2 Knowledge of tools (Theoretical)
3 Technical/Functional skills(Hands on)
4 Knowledge of other connected functions
5 Knowledge of the industry

(Total) ∑(d)= ∑(e)=

Rating(T) ∑(e) / ∑(d) =

Over All Rating = Rating(O)*0.5+ Rating(B)*0.25 + Rating(T)*0.25 =
Note: In case the Level 'C' rater is a Director, such rating is exempted. Calculation will be made on Level 'B' only.
3.0 ASSESSMENT OF TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT UNDERTAKEN LAST YEAR
SN Area of Development Mode Certified by Superior Certified by HOD

1
2
3
4
5
4.0 ASSESSMENT OF FURTHER TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT NEEDS FOR THE COMING YEAR
SN Area of Development Mode Certified by Self Certified by Superior

1
2
3
4
5
5.0 POTENTIAL APPRAISAL
SN Additional Responsibility Shouldered
1
2
3
Over all Rating on Potential by Superior (Out of 5)
Over all Final Rating on Potential by HOD (Out of 5)

Comments by Superior/ HOD

Comments by Unit Head/ Superior's Superior

Signatute of the Employee

Signature of the Superior

Signature of the HOD

For Official use

Parameter Rating
Rating on Output by HOD(a) Final Note:
Rating on Behavioral Attributes by HOD(b)
Rating on Technical Attributes by HOD (c)
Over all Rating = 0.5a +0.25b+0.25c