Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay Writing
Essay Writing
Imagine you are watching a movie with a twist ending and afterward feel like it has to
end that way, this is where the “Hindsight Bias” comes into play. Hindsight bias was
introduced as the tendency to adjust one's memory about earlier given estimates
rational thinking since it limits the human ability to learn from experiences.
Upon closer examination, hindsight bias stems from memory reconstruction. When
looking back at an event, the memory reconstructs the past based on current
knowledge. Being more explicit, hindsight bias describes the observation that people
are often wise only after the event (Pennington, 1981, as cited in Blank et al., 2007).
This reconstruction can lead people to believe that they knew the outcome was
Misinformation Effect”. People who fall prey to the trap of hindsight bias often end up
tendency to simplify and rationalize past events, contribute to hindsight bias, since
the brains tend to streamline complex situations, making them seem more
as cited in Hastie & Scott, 1990). Looking from a broader viewpoint, hindsight bias
knew the outcome of a situation, they might blame others for not acting accordingly,
How many times has any of us said something that we thought was perfectly clear,
only to learn that our intended meaning had failed? Hindsight bias is ingrained in our
subconscious that in some aspects it develops towards the negative. Yet, attributing
responsibility to regconize the effects of hindsight bias so that we can make realistic
References
Blank, H., Musch, J., & Pohl, R. F. (2007). Hindsight bias: on being wise after the
event. Social Cognition, 25(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.1
Hastie, R., & Scott, A. H. (1990). Hindsight: biased judgments of past events after
the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 311–327.
https://doi.org/0033-2909/90/$00.75
Pohl, R. F., Bender, M., & Lachmann, G., (2002). Hindsight bias around the world.
Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 270–82. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-
3169.49.4.270