Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 3 Water Treatment
Lesson 3 Water Treatment
1
Sewage sludge valorization
Fig. 2. Potential sewage sludge to resource and energy recovery routes [1,8].
extraction, incineration, anaerobic digestion (AD), as well as thermo- contain high water contents. Water is utilized as a reaction medium,
Sewage sludge: composition
Valorization technologies
T.E. Seiple et al. Journal of Environmental Management 270 (2020) 110852
Fig. 1. As-modeled layout of HTL (1a) and AD (1b) sludge conversion pathways.
4
Water properties: hydrothermal liquefaction
Hydrothermal liquefaction: a promising route to convert biomass into valuable fuels & chemicals
HTL
O (%)
+
partial up-grading
Up-grading
6
0031, China
e and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
twa, Central Mining Institute, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland
HTL of sewage sludge
S G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T
process conditions on
unicipal sludge.
ilizations of each
f municipal sludge
F O A B S T R A C T
Fig. 4. Potential reaction pathway of the biomass macromolecules to various end-products via HTL process as a function of temperature [59]. Reproduced with
content of biocrude oil in the presence of hydrogen at temperatures leading to a lowered O/C atomic ratio in the upgraded biocrude oil
rotreating, catalytic cracking offers a broader spectrum of products,
between 500 and 550 ◦ C [260]. This process converts heavier hydro-
cost, making it less feasible for large-scale commercial implementation.
(Fig. 22B). It is worth noting that the emulsification upgrading route,
tercarbons
compatibility with
into lighter various feedstocks,
constituents by breakingand C–Cyields
bonds.aCompared
higher pro-to Additionally,
while this method
effective, poses may
challenges due not
to itssignificantly remove certain
high energy consumption and unde-
ionhydrotreating,
of end products. However,
catalytic crackingit offers
does have its drawbacks,
a broader spectrum ofincluding
products, sirable
cost, compounds
making from for
it less feasible biocrude oil, commercial
large-scale as indicated in Fig. 22B.
implementation.
er greater
carbon compatibility
recovery yield
hydrotreating,
portion of end the
and
with
catalytic
products.
swiftfeedstocks,
various
cracking
However, process
it does Biocrude quality
catalyst deactivation
and yields a [261].
results
have its
Un-
higher pro-
in low-energy
drawbacks, including
Other upgrading
Additionally,
on thecompounds
sirable
this method
physicochemical
methods may
may not be used atremove
significantly
characteristics
from biocrude
different
of the biocrude
oil, as indicated
stages,
certain depending
unde-
oil and the nature
in Fig. 22B.
uellower
due tocarbon recoveryin
a reduction yield
the and swiftatoms
carbon catalyst
ofdeactivation
biocrude oil. [261]. Un- and Other upgradingofmethods
properties may beupgrading
the desired used at different stages,ordepending
biofuels chemicals. For
Dueliketohydrotreating, the catalytic
the limitations cracking process
of hydrotreating and results in low-energy
catalytic cracking on the physicochemical
example, hydrogen can characteristics
be generated of the biocrude
through oil and the
catalytic nature
steam reforming
biofuel
hods, due to
they area reduction in the carbon atoms
often synergistically of biocrude
combined inoil.practical and properties
(800–900 ◦
C) ofusing
the desired
nickel, upgrading biofuels or chemicals.
whereas value-added biochemical For species
Heteroatoms: O, N, S problem for utilization= need of up-grading
Due to the limitations of hydrotreating and catalytic cracking example, hydrogen can be generated through catalytic steam reforming
can be extracted from biocrude oil under mild conditions via distillation,
methods, they are often synergistically combined in practical (800–900 C) using nickel, whereas value-added biochemical species
◦
H. Shahbeikcan be extracted from biocrude oil under mild conditions via distillation,
et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189 (2024) 113976
ess to up-
published
ated into
alcohols,
avy (con-
r residue)
from im-
rude also
formance
de oil re-
matically
Fig. 22. H/C vs. O/C atomic ratio for (A) raw biomass, raw biocrude oil, and Fig. 23. Schematic illustration of a typical biocrude oil refinery plant producing renewable fuels and chemicals.
hydrogen upgraded biocrude oil compared to kerosene, petroleum crude oil, and diesel
ir oxygen (B) different upgrading techniques. Notably, the hydrodeoxygenation process is 26
ctions has a type of hydrotreating technique specifically used to remove oxygen from raw
a gradual biocrude oil. The hydrotreating technique eliminates all oxygen, nitrogen, and
sulfur contents of raw biocrude oil (Data obtained from Refs. [61,76,88,89,95,
chain un-
97,115,233,240,250,262–278]).
mperature
than light
ic/acyclic investment. Through this strategy, drop-in biofuel (i.e., gasoline, diesel,
is higher and jet fuel) can be derived via co-processing a blend of biocrude oil with
Biofuels vs. Petroleum fuels
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189 (2024) 113976
Fig. 27. Comparison of minimum fuel selling prices and life cycle GHG emis-
sions of the biofuels derived from biocrude oil with conventional petroleum
fuels, including gasoline (blue square [340]), diesel (yellow square [340]), jet
fuel (purple square [341]), heavy crude (red square [342]), and liquefied pe-
troleum gas (Green square [340]). (The data obtained for biocrude oil-derived
Type of HTL reactors
www.sciencedirect.com
Table 2
Approximated Temperature !
(C) Pressure Oil yield (wt.%) Time (min) Oil HHV (MJ/kg) Highest solid Feedstock Reactor size (L) Reactor type Reference
scale (L/h) (bar) content (wt.%)
0.18–0.42 300–340 165 12.1–21.9 7–17 34.9 5.0 Wastewater algae 0.05 Vertical [46]
double tube
0.6 350 200 42.6–54.8 15 35.8–37.3 18.2 Microalgae 0.19 CSTR [47]
1.44 350 250 38.90 15 35.3 20.0 Dried distillers grain 0.68 PFR [48]
1.5 350 200 58.8 40 NA 21.7 Macroalgae 1 PFR [49]
1.5–2.2 350 200 38–62.6 27–60 NA 35.0 Algae 1 PFR [44]
2.1 350 200 50–56 29 38.8–39.3 17.0 Grapes pomace 1 PFR [41]
2.5 350 185 39.7, 36.8 1.4, 5.8 32.9, 36.1 10.0 Microalgae 0.098 PFR [30]
3–7.5 300–400 270 48.2–60.9 12–30 35.8–37.2 4.0 Fungi 1.5 PFR [50]
4.5 325–350 180 NA 3–9 NA 5 Wastewater algae 0.5 PFR [51]
9&14 kg/h 400 300 20–33 ~50 34.3 16.9 Aspen wood 10 PFR [52]
45 260–280 110–124 NA 30–120 34.1–40.4 10–15 Swine manure, food 35 PFR [2,22]
Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health
processing waste
60 350 220 25–33 20 26.8–33.2 16.0 Energy grass, sewage sludge 20 PFR [42]
HHV, higher heating value; HTL, hydrothermal liquefaction; NA, not available; PFR, plug flow reactor; CSTR, continuous stirred-tank reactor.
a
Space time instead of residence time.
HTL: processi continui (PNNL)
HTL continuous plant
D.C. Elliott et al. / Bioresource Technology 178 (2015) 147–156