Architectural Design and Planning for the Proposed University of Batangas Nasugbu

Campus: Fostering Sustainable Learning Environments and Community Integration

Prepared by:

Prepared for:

Architectural Design 6-Site Development Planning and Landscaping

February 9, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background of the Study

Problems and concerns? Can be solved architecturally

Add present scenario

Technical Problems

Absence and incompatibility of present site

Need for proper planning

Need for recognition of potentials

Why is it necessary to conduct the study

Why in the world must you do this

Will it make the world a better place

Historical background

Don’t delve on too much about it

Connect present problems to historical background, then move on

Education is a driving force for progress, innovation, and societal cohesion. It

plays a pivotal role in addressing global challenges, promoting diversity, and
fostering a sense of shared responsibility. The ongoing evolution of educational
systems reflects the ever-changing needs of societies, emphasizing the
importance of preparing individuals for an increasingly complex and
interconnected world. The transfer of information from one generation to the next
is an essential part of human life. Initially, this transfer was most likely limited to
basic empirical information required for survival and group well-being. Thus, an
improved physical environment in school buildings is integral to creating a holistic
and effective learning ecosystem, positively influencing the educational journey
of students and the overall success of the institution.

A university campus is not just a collection of buildings; it is a living, breathing

ecosystem that profoundly influences the individuals who traverse its pathways.
Beyond the classrooms and lecture halls, it is a space where lives are molded
and shaped in intricate ways, touching upon various dimensions of human
existence. At its core, a university campus is a hub for intellectual exploration. It
is where students don't just attend classes but embark on a journey of discovery.
In these hallowed halls, minds are ignited with curiosity, critical thinking is honed,
and the pursuit of knowledge becomes a way of life. Gifford’s (2002) analysis
indicates that interior architecture and internal features of learning spaces can
help students focus their attention on studying or prevent them from giving full
attention to learning (Yeung, Craven, & Kaur, 2014). Yeoman (2012)
demonstrates that design characteristics such as poor acoustics, poor ventilation,
insufficient lighting, and chronic noise exposure undermine learning. The design
and features inside classrooms and learning spaces can either help students
concentrate on studying or act as distractions that hinder their focus. In simpler
terms, the way a learning environment is set up can either support or disrupt
students' ability to fully engage in their learning. The campus, with its libraries,
laboratories, and academic spaces, is the crucible where academic excellence is
forged. Thus, a proper planning of a university campus is crucial to ensure an
engaging environment for the students to develop a more critical thinking and a
competitive spirit. University campus design changes to meet changing societal
needs in order to maintain sustainable practices, technological integration, and a
supportive learning environment. The architectural design of a university building
situated in an urban area is the subject of this study, which places a strong
emphasis on technological integration and sustainability. Studying a university
campus is valuable because it encompasses various functions like education,
housing, recreation, sports, and cultural activities. The diverse and integrated
nature of a university campus makes it an interesting and worthwhile subject for
investigation.

The needs for an increase in facilities arise and College facilities and other
spaces are created and in due effect, campus planning concepts and
architecture continue to be altered or change. The universities decline their
campuses and architecture of architectural style and originality. Thus, in this
research the University of Batangas, Nasugbu Campus, is proposed. Most old
existing buildings on the campuses reflect architectural meanings besides the
new buildings are with little or without architectural meanings and significance.
The universities now face an architectural issue of maintaining an architectural
character or pattern and a comprehensive campus planning and have a great
 challenge of providing flexibility and indeterminacy. Schooling systems could be
perceived through three main dimensions: students, the learning process and the
built environment portrayed in the school building. Each dimension comprises
different parameters. The challenge universities face is maintaining the
architectural significance of their old buildings while dealing with new
constructions that often lack such meaningful design. The struggle lies in
balancing a consistent architectural character across the campus and
implementing flexible, adaptable planning. Understanding schooling systems
involves considering three main dimensions: students, the learning process, and
the built environment represented by the school buildings. Each dimension
encompasses various parameters that contribute to the overall educational
experience.

Statement of the Problem

Objectives

Drawing from research on university campuses, user behavior, and effective site
planning, this study aims to investigate potential overarching concepts for the
campus planning and architecture of the proposed University of Batangas
Nasugbu Campus. The primary focus is on enhancing the relationship between
students, teachers, and the university by establishing a methodology for creating
a campus architecture that improves the daily lives of students. Field
observations were conducted with a specific focus on spatial organization, site
layout, master planning, land use, spatial utilization, and architectural details. The
goal is to identify diverse concepts and approaches to campus design and
architecture.

Scope and Limitations

The scope of this study is the physical aspects of the university campuses
concerning its planning and architecture. This study dives at the dynamic growth
of university campuses, which are critical to the advancement of knowledge and
 societal progress as they adapt to changing needs. The focus is on a university
building in an urban setting, emphasizing the importance of incorporating
technology into its design and implementing sustainable practices. The ultimate
goal is to create a nurturing atmosphere that not only accommodates the
unique characteristics of urban settings, but also seamlessly integrates cutting-
edge technology and environmental principles. This project aims to improve the
learning experience while also positively impacting the larger community.

Significance of the Study

Assumptions

Definition of Terms and Concepts

Review of Related Literature and Studies

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework

INTRODUCTION

BODY

RELATED LITERATURE

2.1.1. Campus Architecture

Education has been recognized in modern societies as one of the main

contributors to economic productivity and growth (Ball, 2008). In today's
societies, education is widely recognized as a key driver of economic productivity
and growth. In essence, a well-educated population has a significant impact on a
society's overall economic development. Education provides individuals with the
necessary skills and knowledge for the workplace, promoting innovation,
efficiency, and progress. It is regarded as a critical investment for societal
development and economic prosperity. According to Schneider (2002), healthy
and comfortable learning spaces are strong factors for successful learning.
Lyons’s (2001) analysis shows that temperature, heating and air quality, lighting
and acoustics are strong components that hinder or enhance student
performance. Research has proven that school buildings and designs can boost
student morale and performance. In fact, student performance is tied up with
school design and equitable access to learning tools and spaces enable students
to share best practices (Zubrzycki, 2013). Therefore, it is urgent to raise public
awareness of school design and student performance.

Campus planning is a vital component for any higher educational institution.

Campus planning is a method for directing, facilitating, and protecting an
institution's structured physical development. It oversees the creation and
management of campus infrastructure and facilities. Furthermore, improvement
in the physical environment of learning (school building) is crucial to the
understanding of the learning process, the students’ needs and activities (Sanoff,
2015; Lackney, 2015). In essence, the improvement of the physical environment
within school buildings is not a mere aesthetic consideration; it is a strategic
investment in the holistic development of students and the overall effectiveness
of the educational process. By creating a supportive and dynamic atmosphere,
schools can better address the diverse needs of students, foster a positive
learning experience, and prepare individuals for a future that demands
adaptability and innovation.

University campus planning offers unique ways to demonstrate and popularize

emerging developments in urban planning and guides for the size, quality, usage,
and location of facilities to achieve a preconceived goal. It's a strategic approach
to designing and organizing the university space, ensuring it aligns with modern
urban planning principles and serves the intended purposes effectively. The
design is typically represented as a physical form, and the form will differ from an
aspect of the entire campus buildings and surrounding area depending on the
scope. Campus planning affects the campus environment besides the socio-
economic development of the campus as well. Thus, needs to reflect the
mandate and purpose of the university. (Norton et al, 2007). Campuses are
normally likened to cities due to their high independent elements. According to
Dober (1964), campuses are in three parts, which are, the physical buildings,
open areas, and supporting spaces and element which include services and
circulation. Dober said that the supporting elements are necessary to sustain the
operations of the campus. He also mentioned clearly, building separately or
isolating buildings from its surroundings should be avoided and develop an
interdependency consciousness when planning. Walker and Gough (1962), also
added that continuous campus development designed and built by different
teams or firms leads to varying building styles and forms. Buildings should be
designed or inspired by the existing old campus buildings to maintain unity
throughout the entire campus architecture (Walker and Gough,1962).

2.1.2. Principles of Campus Planning

When planning a campus, it is best to follow urban planning concepts.

This ensures that the campus is not only visually stunning, but also
adaptable to future changes and advancements. These principles drive
the campus's physical development, taking into account both natural and
cultural factors. They give a framework for assessing future land-use
proposals and deciding on the kind, size, and location of new facilities in
order to preserve a unified and functional campus environment.

2.1.3. Identity and character

A campus's identity stems from the uniqueness of its buildings and
scenery, resulting in a visually cohesive and aesthetically pleasant
recognition. This means that existing and new structures, as well as the
spaces between them, should be integrated in a way that creates a
cohesive and harmonious composition. In layman's terms, the campus
should have a distinct and visually appealing character accomplished by
the careful layout and linking of its buildings and outdoor areas. Entry
features should be appropriately scaled and well designed in
inconsistency, with the character of the campus and a sense of arrival
(TURNER, 1984). Entry features at a campus should be designed in a
 way that is well-proportioned and consistent with the overall character of
the campus. They should create a sense of arrival, providing a welcoming
and appropriately scaled introduction to the campus environment. In
simpler terms, the design of entry features should match the overall style
of the campus, making visitors feel like they have arrived at a distinct and
cohesive place.

2.1.4. Site Layout and Land use

The campus core is grouped with development, and a loop system is
promoted to improve workability. Provide a variety of useful open areas
while protecting and conserving surrounding lands for future usage.
Establishing pedestrian and vehicular linkages with surrounding
properties to enhance end-user convenience, facilities, and beneficial
synergies. A comprehensive network of various open spaces to foster
both formal and casual encounters. To improve the functionality of a
campus, it's recommended to cluster development around a central core
and establish a loop system. This arrangement enhances efficiency. It's
important to create diverse open spaces that can be utilized, while also
protecting perimeter lands for future needs. Establishing pedestrian and
vehicular connections with neighboring properties makes it convenient for
users and promotes positive interactions. Overall, a well-planned network
of open spaces encourages both formal and informal interactions on the
campus.

2.1.5. Landscape, Streetscape, and Signage

Structures should be identified and planned to build vibrant and safe
public ways that have day and night wide surveillance from occupants to
provide defensive and utilizable spaces. Make provision for safe bicycle
parking areas. Site and street furniture, walkways, and lighting fixtures
and systems must be provided on all public spaces to enhance the design
of landscape on campus. When planning structures, it's crucial to create
vibrant and secure public spaces. These areas should have visibility both
during the day and night, ensuring they are both defensible and usable.
Additionally, provisions for safe bicycle parking should be made. Public
 spaces should be equipped with site and street furniture, well-designed
walkways, and proper lighting fixtures and systems. This approach
enhances the overall campus landscape design while prioritizing safety
and functionality.

2.1.6. Circulation and Accessibility

Equal access to campus by all people regardless of their disabilities,
stature, or other factors must be designed for. The campus should
emphasize pedestrian and vehicle in a pedestrian-oriented de- sign to
provide a comprehensive, accessible circulation network all over campus
to facilitate secure and convenient access across campus. A pedestrian-
oriented campus gives priority to pedestrian access thereby subordinating
vehicular systems. Pedestrian routes should be designed to
accommodate use and circulation all the time. The campus should be
designed to provide equal access for everyone, regardless of disabilities
or other factors. To achieve this, the campus design should prioritize
pedestrian access over vehicular systems. This means creating a
comprehensive and accessible circulation network throughout the
campus to ensure secure and convenient access for everyone. A
pedestrian-oriented design gives priority to walking paths, making them
accommodating and accessible at all times, while vehicular systems take
a secondary role. The campus should be well accessed by all
transportation modes from every direction. Provide a safe and appropriate
flow of traffic with clearly defined preferred vehicular routes (TURNER,
1984). The campus should be easily accessible from all directions using
various transportation modes. To ensure safety and efficiency, there
should be clear and defined preferred routes for vehicles, facilitating a
smooth flow of traffic throughout the campus. In simpler terms, the design
should accommodate all transportation methods and have well-defined
routes for vehicles to enhance accessibility and safety.
REFERENCES

Ball, S. J. (2008) The Education Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press, University of
Bristol

Dober, R. P. (1964) Campus planning. New York, Reinhold.

Lyons, J. (2001). Do school facilities really impact a child’s education? In Issue

Trak: A CEFPI Brief on Educational Facility Issues. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of
Educational Facility Planners International.

Norton, R. K., Brix, A., Brydon, T., Davidian, E., Dinse, K., dan Vidyarthi, S.
(2007). Transforming The University Campus Into Sustainable Community.
Planning for Higher Education. Vol 35, No 4 pp 22-39

Schneider, M. (2002). Do school facilities affect academic outcomes?

Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

TURNER, P. V. (1984) ‘Campus Planning’, Science, pp. 786–786. doi:

10.1126/science.786-a.

Yeoman, B. (2012). Special report: Rebuilding America’s schools. Parade

Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.parade.com/news/2012/08/12-rebuilding-
americas-schools.html

Yeung, A. S., Craven,R. G., & Kaur, G. (2014). Teachers’ self-concept and
valuing of learning: Relations with teaching approaches and beliefs about
students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 305-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.905670

Zubrzycki, J. (2013). Schools’ design can play role in safety, student

engagement. Education Week, 32(16), 32. Retrieved January 17, 2013, from
 http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/01/10/16physical.h32.html?tkn=
LYYFu5rSTJW8a

DATA PRESENTATION
SITE ANALYSIS
Location----- F Alix Street Nasugbu------------- 1 km away from main road
where the main establishments are situated
May mga tindahan at karinderia malapit
May creek

Weather -------- Yearly & Monthly weather - Nasugbu, Philippines

(weather-atlas.com)

SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
 Creek ------could be used to help sa pagddrain ng stormwater, reduce
flooding, yung mga tubig galing sa palayan,
Road sa side -----could be used by cars to enter the campus-may
entrance at exit sa tabi
Malaki yung site suited for campus-------madaming mailalagay
Walang matataas na building ------meaning less pollution at less noise
Malapit sa residential building
Good climate
Site facing south

Census of Population – Official Website of the Province of Batangas

WEAKNESS
FLOOD PRONE AREA
Small road
No built in side walk
1 km away from main road
Creek -------mosquitoes plus unsafe for students ---walang
sidewalk-----walang haring yung creek---
Lacks sa vegetation

OPPORTUNITIES
Arch 301: SWOT Analysis – Ipek Helvacı // Architecture
Student // (wordpress.com)
ADD VEGETATION
Nasugbu (Municipality, Philippines) - Population Statistics,
Charts, Map and Location (citypopulation.de)
THREATS
1.9 km away from bsu nasugbu school

SPATIAL PROGRAMMING
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
SPACE DEFINITION AND IDENTIFICATION
Muslim prayer room
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF EXPECTED USERS
Nasugbu, Batangas Profile – PhilAtlas
USER ANALYSIS AND BEHAVIORAL PATTERN
GRAPHICAL SPATIAL TRANSLATION
BUBBLE DIAGRAM
MATRIX DIAGRAM
UTILITY SYSTEMS TO BE USED
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
MECHANICAL
PLUMBING
DESIGN FRAMEWORK
DESIGN CONCEPT
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
STYLE GUIDING PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSION