Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nanomaterials 12 01027
Nanomaterials 12 01027
Review
Metamaterials and Metasurfaces: A Review from the
Perspectives of Materials, Mechanisms and
Advanced Metadevices
Adnan Ali 1 , Anirban Mitra 2 and Brahim Aïssa 1, *
1 Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute (QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU),
Qatar Foundation, Doha P.O. Box 34110, Qatar; adali@hbku.edu.qa
2 Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India;
anirban.mitra@ph.iitr.ac.in
* Correspondence: brahim.aissa@mpbc.ca or baissa@hbku.edu.qa
Abstract: Throughout human history, the control of light, electricity and heat has evolved to become
the cornerstone of various innovations and developments in electrical and electromagnetic technolo-
gies. Wireless communications, laser and computer technologies have all been achieved by altering
the way light and other energy forms act naturally and how to manage them in a controlled manner.
At the nanoscale, to control light and heat, matured nanostructure fabrication techniques have been
developed in the last two decades, and a wide range of groundbreaking processes have been achieved.
Photonic crystals, nanolithography, plasmonics phenomena and nanoparticle manipulation are the
main areas where these techniques have been applied successfully and led to an emergent material
sciences branch known as metamaterials. Metamaterials and functional material development strate-
gies are focused on the structures of the matter itself, which has led to unconventional and unique
electromagnetic properties through the manipulation of light—and in a more general picture the
Citation: Ali, A.; Mitra, A.; Aïssa, B.
electromagnetic waves—in widespread manner. Metamaterial’s nanostructures have precise shape,
Metamaterials and Metasurfaces: A
geometry, size, direction and arrangement. Such configurations are impacting the electromagnetic
Review from the Perspectives of
Materials, Mechanisms and
light waves to generate novel properties that are difficult or even impossible to obtain with natural
Advanced Metadevices. materials. This review discusses these metamaterials and metasurfaces from the perspectives of
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027. https:// materials, mechanisms and advanced metadevices in depth, with the aim to serve as a solid reference
doi.org/10.3390/nano12061027 for future works in this exciting and rapidly emerging topic.
Figure
Figure 1.
1. Schematic
Schematic depicting
depicting the
the evolution
evolution of
of the
the field
field of
of metamaterials
metamaterials over
over the
the years,
years, from
from 1968
1968
to nowadays.
to nowadays.
2. Classification of Metamaterials
The term “metamaterial” comesAccording
from the to Their
Greek Physical
words Properties
“meta” and “material”, while
“meta”Therefers to something
core concept that is beyond
of metamaterial designusual,
is to rearranged, changed
craft materials or artificially
by using innovative.de- It
is an engineered
signed material
and fabricated intended
structural to attain
units unique
to achieve theproperties and capabilities
desired properties which are
and functionali-
absent
ties. in natural
These materials.
structural units—theTheconstituent
term metamaterial
artificial is introduced
‘atoms’ by Walser of
and ‘molecules’ in the
1999 [6].
met-
Metamaterial cannot be obtained from any continuous and homogenous medium,
amaterial—can be tailored in shape and size, the lattice constant and interatomic interac- that
is why
tion canthe metamaterials
be artificially tuned,are always
and of acan
‘defects’ composite
be designednature.
and Usually,
placed atmetamaterials
desired locations.are
constructed from discrete resonant micro- and nanometer-scale objects which
By engineering the arrangement of these nanoscale unit cells into a desired architecture mimic the
electromagnetic
or geometry, onereaction
can tuneofthe atoms and molecules
refractive index of the ofmetamaterial
natural substances to make
to positive, them
near-zero
interact with light and other forms of energy in specific controllable ways.
Figure
Figure2.2.Summary
Summary ofofthe
themetamaterial’s
metamaterial’s classification
classification basedbased onpermittivity
on their their permittivity (ε) and permea-
(ε) and permeabil-
bility (μ).
ity (µ). Adapted
Adapted from
from Ref.Ref.
[16].[16].
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 4 of 32
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 33
Thedimensionality
The dimensionalityofof thethe range
range of components
of components that that
formform the (3D)
the bulk bulkstructures
(3D) structures
is
another criterion for metamaterial classification. They are structures that havehave
is another criterion for metamaterial classification. They are structures that a large
a large
number of
number ofconstituent
constituentelements
elements inin any
any given
given direction.
direction. TheThe materials
materials on surface
on the the surface
(i.e., (i.e.,
2D) are equivalent to the case where a thin film structure is made of 1–3 constituents only. only.
2D) are equivalent to the case where a thin film structure is made of 1–3 constituents
Surface-typemetamaterials
Surface-type metamaterialsare aregenerally
generallycalled
called metafilms
metafilms or or metasurfaces.
metasurfaces. Optical
Optical waveg-
wave-
uide with nano inclusions and plasmonics and polaritonic nano-chains
guide with nano inclusions and plasmonics and polaritonic nano-chains are considered are considered
as linear
as linear (1D)
(1D) structures.
structures.AsAsa amattermatter of of fact,
fact, optical
optical waveguides
waveguides are are
alsoalso identified
identified as as
meta-waveguides[18–20].
meta-waveguides [18–20].
Metamaterialsinina afunctional
Metamaterials functionalapplications
applications field
field were
were extensively
extensively investigated,
investigated, and and
included(but
included (butnot
notlimited
limited to)to) light
light sources,
sources, sensors,
sensors, memory,
memory, phasephase
change,change, microelec-
microelectro-
tromechanical
mechanical systems
systems (MEMS),
(MEMS), nanoelectromechanical
nanoelectromechanical systems
systems (NEMS),
(NEMS), superconductors
superconductors
(based onon negative
negative index
indexmetamaterials),
metamaterials),chiralchiralmetamaterials
metamaterials(intrinsic
(intrinsicand
andextrinsic
extrinsicmeta-
metasurfaces), dispersion
surfaces), dispersion metamaterials
metamaterials andand artificialmagnetism
artificial magnetismand and transformation
transformation op- optical
tical metamaterials [14,15,21,22].
metamaterials [14,15,21,22].
The
Theterm
termmetamaterial
metamaterialisisalso alsoused in in
used conjunction
conjunction with artificially
with designed
artificially materials
designed materials
to exhibit
exhibit novel properties of waves such as phononic metamaterials [23]. the
novel properties of waves such as phononic metamaterials [23]. On On other
the other
hand,
hand, electromagnetic
electromagneticwaves wavesare arestimulated
stimulated bybya different kind
a different of non-electromagnetic
kind of non-electromagnetic
waves such
waves suchasasthe sound
the soundwaves of piezoelectric
waves and/orand/or
of piezoelectric spin waves
spinofwaves
nanostructured mag-
of nanostructured
netic materials.
magnetic materials.
3. Evolution
Evolutionof ofMetamaterials
Metamaterials
In
In 2019, Vicarietetal.
2019, Vicari al.[24]
[24]modeled
modeledthe thegrowth
growth of of
metamaterial-containing
metamaterial-containing devices
devices
across eight different applications (displayed in Figure 3). The model looked
across eight different applications (displayed in Figure 3). The model looked at potential at potential
addressable
addressable markets
marketsbased
basedon onvarious
variousparameters
parametersincluding
includingthe thecost,
cost,maturity
maturity and per-
and perfor-
formance. It is based on inputs from a wide range of primary and secondary
mance. It is based on inputs from a wide range of primary and secondary research. Vicari research.
Vicari
and hisand hisexplicitly
team team explicitly
seizedseized the markets
the markets for metamaterial
for metamaterial components
components in commu-
in communications,
nications, sensing and acoustic applications. Many other applications
sensing and acoustic applications. Many other applications are likely to appear are likely to appear
and were
and were grouped together into an “other” category. Market forecast for
grouped together into an “other” category. Market forecast for metamaterials is put metamaterials is at
put atbillion
$10.7 $10.7 billion by Through
by 2030. 2030. Through2025, 2025, communications
communications usesuses arefar
are by by the
far leading
the leading
growth
growth driver; however, by 2030, sensing uses grow to be the largest segment, reaching
driver; however, by 2030, sensing uses grow to be the largest segment, reaching $5.5 billion
$5.5 billion compared to $4.4 billion in communications.
compared to $4.4 billion in communications.
Figure 3.
Figure Metamaterialsmarket
3.Metamaterials market forecast:
forecast: metamaterial
metamaterial devices
devices are are poised
poised to grow
to grow to $10.7
to $10.7 billion
billion by by
2030
2030 in
in 5G
5Gnetworks,
networks,autonomous
autonomousvehicles and
vehicles connected
and vehicles.
connected Adapted
vehicles. fromfrom
Adapted Ref. Ref.
[24].[24].
The origin of metamaterials could be linked to various examples of the pyramid brick
wall, Parthenon columns and medieval ruby glass, as shown in Figure 4. Other “historical”
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 33
Figure 4. Examples of some “historical” original metamaterials, adapted from Ref. [26].
Figure 4. Examples of some “historical” original metamaterials, adapted from Ref. [26].
Metasurfaces
Depending
Depending on on the
the materials
materials employed
employed and and geometry,
geometry, andand per
per their
their frequency
frequency re-re-
sponses,
sponses, metasurface-based device’s classification has been made as narrowband [3,27],
metasurface-based device’s classification has been made as narrowband [3,27],
broadband [28–30] and wideband [31]. Fano Fano resonance
resonance isis the typical case of narrowband
application.
application. The
The sharp
sharp resonance
resonance peak
peak complemented
complemented by by strong local field enhancement
is amongst
amongst the most important
important aspects
aspects of Fano resonance [32,33]. It It is the foundation
foundation of
several practical
practicalapplications
applicationssuchsuch as nonlinear
as nonlinear photonics
photonics and biological
and biological sensing.
sensing. Metasur-
Metasurface dispersion
face dispersion for multiband
for multiband and broadband
and broadband applications
applications can support
can support super-res-
super-resolution
imagingimaging
olution beyond the diffraction
beyond limit, high-performance
the diffraction color filter,
limit, high-performance broadband
color absorbers
filter, broadband
and polarizers
absorbers [31,34–36].[31,34–36].
and polarizers
Metasurfaces are two-dimensional
Metasurfaces two-dimensional (2D) or planar versions of metamaterials dealing
with subwavelength
subwavelengththickness
thickness[37–39].
[37–39].Metasurfaces
Metasurfaceshave
haveunique abilities
unique to block,
abilities absorb,
to block, ab-
concentrate, disperse or guide waves on the surface at a grazing incidence
sorb, concentrate, disperse or guide waves on the surface at a grazing incidence angle andangle and in
space at normal and oblique incidence, from microwave to visible frequencies.
in space at normal and oblique incidence, from microwave to visible frequencies. Surface
waves can
waves can be
be well
well controlled
controlled by
by designing
designing impedance
impedance cells
cells to
to manipulate
manipulate phase
phase or or group
group
velocity [40,41]. These are patterned in such a way that may guide or separate waves
in certain directions, and/or used to control scattering. By controlling the metasurface,
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 33
Chartsummarizing
Figure5.5.Chart
Figure summarizingthe
themetasurfaces’
metasurfaces’and
andmetadevices’
metadevices’applications.
applications.
Three-dimensional(3D)
Three-dimensional (3D)metamaterials,
metamaterials,mademadeoften
oftenwith
withperiodic
periodicartificial
artificialmaterials
materials
composed of metals and/or dielectrics, have been widely studied owing
composed of metals and/or dielectrics, have been widely studied owing to their uniqueto their unique
interactionwith
interaction withelectromagnetic
electromagneticwaves
wavesthat
thatexceed
exceedthe
thecapabilities
capabilitiesofofnaturally
naturallyoccurring
occurring
or homogeneous materials [27,43,44]. Their exceptional ability to manipulate waves isisdue
or homogeneous materials [27,43,44]. Their exceptional ability to manipulate waves due
to their strong interaction with electrical and/or magnetic fields, typically provided
to their strong interaction with electrical and/or magnetic fields, typically provided by by
unit cell geometry-controlled resonant effects. These capabilities result in a broad
unit cell geometry-controlled resonant effects. These capabilities result in a broad range range
ofofapplications
applicationssuch
suchasasantenna
antennaefficiency
efficiencyenhancement
enhancement[45,46],
[45,46],ideal
idealabsorbers
absorbers[47–49],
[47–49],
superlenses [25,50], cloaking [51–53], elimination of scattering [28,54] and energy
superlenses [25,50], cloaking [51–53], elimination of scattering [28,54] and energy harvest- harvest-
ing[16,55,56],
ing [16,55,56],among
among other
other applications
applications ininmicrowave
microwaveand andoptical
opticalfrequencies.
frequencies. When
When active
ac-
and nonlinear components such as transistors [57,58], diodes [58,59], and varactors [60–62]
tive and nonlinear components such as transistors [57,58], diodes [58,59], and varactors
are added to metasurfaces, novel tunability and switching abilities become possible.
[60–62] are added to metasurfaces, novel tunability and switching abilities become possi-
ble.
4. Metamaterial Fabrication Techniques
Transmission
4. Metamaterial line, resonant
Fabrication and hybrid methods are among the most common design
Techniques
approaches to efficiently fabricate metamaterials from a micrometer to nanometer scale.
The Transmission
implementation line,ofresonant and hybrid
hard materials suchmethods are among the into
as dielectrics/metals mostflexible
common design
materials,
approaches
combined withto efficiently fabricate
the cutting-edge metamaterials
nanometer featurefrom
size atechniques,
micrometer tomade
has nanometer scale.to
it possible
fabricate stretchable devices across multidisciplinary.
The implementation of hard materials such as dielectrics/metals into flexible materials,
combined with the cutting-edge nanometer feature size techniques, has made it possible
to fabricate stretchable devices across multidisciplinary.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 7 of 32
4.1. Photolithography
4.1.Photolithography
Photolithography is a technique of microfabrication, which can be used to synthesize
metamaterials that work at terahertz frequencies. This technique has been commonly used
Photolithography is a technique of microfabrication, which can be used to synthesize
in the manufacturing
metamaterials of single
that work and multilayer
at terahertz (3D)
frequencies. metamaterials
This technique has[63],
beensince it is able to
commonly
fabricate high-resolution subwavelength structures at wavelength 30 μm –
used in the manufacturing of single and multilayer (3D) metamaterials [63], since it iswith
3 mm able min-
imal complication
to fabricate [64,65]. Figure
high-resolution 6 provides
subwavelength an example
structures of the reported
at wavelength 30 µm–3 mm metamaterial
with
minimal complication [64,65]. Figure 6 provides an example of the reported metamaterial
made by microfabrication onto flexible substrates. Resonators have been fabricated in the
made
metal bydeposited
film microfabrication onto flexible
on spin-coated substrates.
polyimide Resonators
substrates. have been
In order fabricated
to prevent the in
delam-
the metal film deposited on spin-coated polyimide substrates. In order to prevent
ination of metal structures, the micron resolution patterns produced by this technique are the
delamination of metal structures, the micron resolution patterns produced by this technique
typically further coated with a thin film of polyimide. In general, microfabrication photo-
are typically further coated with a thin film of polyimide. In general, microfabrication
lithography techniques
photolithography are only
techniques areappropriate for substrates
only appropriate that are
for substrates thatorganic and corrosive
are organic and
solvent resistant.
corrosive solvent resistant.
Figure
Figure6. (A). Photolithography:
6. (A). Photolithography:Microfabricated
Microfabricatedterahertz
terahertz metamaterials
metamaterials on onflexible
flexiblesubstrates,
substrates, (B)
Shadow MaskMask
(B) Shadow Lithography
Lithography(SML): SML
(SML): SMLmanufacturing
manufacturingsequence,
sequence,(A,B) Reprintedwith
(A,B) Reprinted withthetheper-
permis-
sion of Copyright
mission © 2018,
of Copyright Springer
© 2018, International
Springer PublishingAG).
International Publishing AG). (C)(C) Electron
Electron Beam Beam Lithography
Lithography
(EBL): (a–g)
(EBL): (a–g)Steps
Stepsfor
forthe
thetransferred double-layergraphene
transferred double-layer graphene on on a flexible
a flexible substrate.
substrate. (Reprinted
(Reprinted with with
permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center), (D) Soft Lithography,
permission from Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center), (D) Soft Lithography, (a–c) Fabrication of (a–c) Fabrication
of elastomeric stamps,(d–f)
elastomeric stamps, (d–f) Replica
Replica molding
molding (g–i)(g–i) transfer
transfer printing,
printing, (E) Transfer
(E) Transfer Lithography:
Lithography: Flexible Flex-
iblephotonic
photonic metastructures
metastructures (a) schematic
(a) schematic for a high-contrast
for a high-contrast metastructure
metastructure (HCM) preparation.
(HCM) preparation. (b) SEM (b)
SEM images
images after
after etching.
etching. (c) (c) Microscopic
Microscopic (left)
(left) andand
SEMSEM (right)
(right) fortransferred
for the the transferred
HCMs HCMs on PDMS.
on PDMS.
(Reprinted
(Reprinted with
withpermission
permission from RoyalSociety
from Royal Societyofof Chemistry).
Chemistry).
4.2.4.2. Shadow
Shadow MaskLithography
Mask Lithography
The shadow mask lithography (SML) is a technique which is acid-free manufacturing,
The shadow mask lithography (SML) is a technique which is acid-free manufactur-
produces micro- and nanoscale patterns in planar and multiple layers, similar to screen
ing, produces micro- and nanoscale patterns in planar and multiple layers, similar to
printing of conductive ink. This technique involves direct deposition of thin metal films,
screen
oxidesprinting
or otherofdielectric
conductive ink. This
particles technique
on substrate involves
using direct
a pattern deposition
without of thin
any etching andmetal
films, oxides or other
photolithography dielectric
[66–68]. particles on substrate
The manufacturing sequence ofusing a pattern
the SML without
technology any etching
is shown in
and photolithography
Figure [66–68].
6A [69,70]. A stencil The manufacturing
is fabricated sequence
usually by etching of the
the silicon SML
wafer technology is
or aluminum
foil. The stencil is either directly in contact with the substrate or close to it. In order to
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 8 of 32
extensive writing times usually associated with this process, any variation will lead to
incoherent exposure and introduces geometric errors [74,77].
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 developing ultrathin all-dielectric metalenses. The ground-breaking advantages 10 of 32 of th
novel technique include cost effective and time effective single-step fabrication, nanome
ric sizes and all-dielectric composition. This technique can be used in applications acros
industry
and and
scientific scientific
research, research,
such such as in optical
as in miniaturized miniaturized
devices,optical devices,
advanced advanced
microscopy and micros
copy and[87,88,90].
flat-optics flat-optics [87,88,90].
Figure
Figure 7. 7. Heterogeneously
Heterogeneously integrated
integrated metamaterial/metadevice
metamaterial/metadevice assembly assembly onsubstrates
on universal universal bysubstrate
bymodular
3D 3D modular transfer
transfer printing:
printing: (a) modularized
(a) modularized basicblocks
basic building building blocks preparation,
preparation, (b) metamate
(b) metamaterials
rials on a silicon membrane (MoSM) and graphene on a silicon (GoSM) picking up
on a silicon membrane (MoSM) and graphene on a silicon (GoSM) picking up by the 5-microtip stamp. by the 5-microti
stamp. (c) Three-dimensional modular transfer printing used to fabricate a metamaterial/metade
(c) Three-dimensional modular transfer printing used to fabricate a metamaterial/metadevice. Two-
vice. Two-dimensional
dimensional and three-dimensional
and three-dimensional metamaterials andmetamaterials
metadevices byand metadevices
assembling each by assembling eac
individual
building lock (i.e., MoSM or GoSM). (Reprinted with the permission of Copyright © 2018, Springer © 201
individual building lock (i.e., MoSM or GoSM). (Reprinted with the permission of Copyright
Springer International
International Publishing AG).
Publishing AG).
Though
Though these
these techniques
techniques are promising
are promising in creating
in creating 3D metamaterial
3D metamaterial structures;
structures; how- how
ever, they are not versatile and mature enough. Some of these presented methods are
ever, they are not versatile and mature enough. Some of these presented methods are ra rather
complex and need
ther complex andvarious manufacturing
need various steps thatsteps
manufacturing impact their
that structural
impact theirresolution,
structural resolu
while others are restricted by the type of materials employed for the patterning process and
tion, while others are restricted by the type of materials employed for the patterning pro
also by the option of the appropriate substrates. Additionally, transfer techniques are based
cess and also by the option of the appropriate substrates. Additionally, transfer technique
on the chemistry of the surface, and as a result, they are reliant on it. Overall, the use of
are based on the chemistry of the surface, and as a result, they are reliant on it. Overal
the use of complex techniques involving soft lithography and photolithography fusion t
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW
Figure
Figure 8. Schematic
8. Schematic of theofNanoengineered
the Nanoengineered Metamaterials
Metamaterials and
and Super Cell. Super Cell.
Figure
Figure9. 9.Reconfigurable
Reconfigurable and
and Tunable
Tunable Metadevices (A,B)Reprinted
Metadevices (A,B) Reprintedwith
withpermission
permission from
from John
John
Wiley and Sons in Copyrights Clearance
Wiley and Sons in Copyrights Clearance center, (C) Reprinted with permission from Copyright
(C) Reprinted with permission from Copyright © ©
2020, American Chemical Society, (D) Reprinted with permission from Creative Commons
2020, American Chemical Society, (D) Reprinted with permission from Creative Commons Attri- Attrib-
ution 4.0 International License, (E) Reprinted with permission from Copyright © 2020, American
bution 4.0 International License, (E) Reprinted with permission from Copyright © 2020, American
Chemical Society.
Chemical Society.
There is consequently a significant impact on metadevices based on MEMS, NEMS,
Initially, by using transmission lines tuning, MEMSs have been utilized for electro-
and micro-/nanofluidic technologies, where the mechanical nanoscale oscillation frequen-
magnetic metamaterials. Similarly, infrared and terahertz detectors for thermally activated
cies could lie within the GHz range, and the metamolecules can be operated at high band-
structures can be applied. The strength of the dipole–dipole coupling of these MEMEs
width on the basis of subwavelength cantilevers.
can be continuously adjusted by fine-tuning the distance between the two rings using the
MEMS’ actuators, thereby
5.2. Electro-Optical enabling efficient electromagnetic adaptation reaction. The recon-
Metadevices
figuration of the metamolecules may enable the polarization of anisotropic metamaterial to
The main advantage of the electro-optical metadevices is their capability of reaching
be switched independently [106–109].
subwavelength deep modulation. They can operate at lower voltages offering an econom-
There is consequently a significant impact on metadevices based on MEMS, NEMS, and
ical benefit compared with conventional technologies that use massive and costly electro-
micro-/nanofluidic technologies, where the mechanical nanoscale oscillation frequencies
optical crystals. Initially, an active metadevice for the terahertz part of the spectrum was
could lie within the GHz range, and the metamolecules can be operated at high bandwidth
developed for a real-time radiation control using electric signals [110]. On a semiconduct-
on the basis of subwavelength cantilevers.
ing substrate, Au metamaterial-arrayed metadevices were successfully fabricated to a
manufactured electro-optical metadevice. An effective Schottky diode was formed by
5.2. Electro-Optical Metadevices
combining Au array and the substrate, in which the semiconducting nature can be con-
The by
trolled main advantage
injected of the electro-optical
and depleted metadevices electrical
carriers. The high-frequency is their capability of reaching
conductivity of the
subwavelength deep modulation. They can operate at lower voltages offering
metamaterial is affected by an electrical signal and impacts its resonant response [111– an eco-
nomical benefit compared with conventional technologies that use massive
113]. This approach offers the possibility to modulate the terahertz transmission by about and costly
electro-optical crystals. Initially, an active metadevice for the terahertz part
50%. The frequency and modulation bandwidths of this kind of metamaterial device are of the spectrum
wasupdeveloped
to 10 MHz for a real-time radiation control using electric signals [110]. On a semicon-
[92,112,114].
ducting substrate, Au
Graphene was also metamaterial-arrayed
extensively used to metadevices were successfully
build electro-optical fabricated
metamaterials (Figure to
a manufactured
10), and successfully applied as a modulator by modifying the electromagnetic responseby
electro-optical metadevice. An effective Schottky diode was formed
combining
particularlyAuinarray and theand
the infrared substrate,
terahertzindomains
which the semiconducting
[115–117]. Significant nature canampli-
oscillator be con-
trolled bythe
tude of injected and depleted
graphene carriers. The
plasmon resonances high-frequency
lead electrical
to noticeable optical conductivity
absorption peaksofatthe
metamaterial is affected Moreover,
the room temperature. by an electrical signal and
the response impacts
of the its resonant
graphene response
can be tuned [111–113].
efficiently by
This approachdoping
electrostatic offers the
overpossibility to modulate
a broad frequency in thethe terahertz
terahertz transmission by about 50%.
range.
The frequency and modulation bandwidths of this kind of metamaterial device are up to
10 MHz [92,112,114].
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 13 of 32
Graphene was also extensively used to build electro-optical metamaterials (Figure 10),
and successfully applied as a modulator by modifying the electromagnetic response par-
ticularly in the infrared and terahertz domains [115–117]. Significant oscillator amplitude
of the graphene plasmon resonances lead to noticeable optical absorption peaks13atofthe
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 33
room temperature. Moreover, the response of the graphene can be tuned efficiently by
electrostatic doping over a broad frequency in the terahertz range.
Figure 10. (A). Metamaterial electro-optic switch: (a) A hybrid device with planar plasmonics Au
Figure 10. (A). Metamaterial electro-optic switch: (a) A hybrid device with planar plasmonics Au
metamaterial coated with GLS chalcogenide glass on a SiN membrane. (b) Before GLS deposition,
metamaterial coated with GLS chalcogenide glass on a SiN membrane. (b) Before GLS deposition,
SEM of the asymmetric split-ring ASR slit array. (c) ASR structure computed optical absorption
SEM of without
spectra the asymmetric
GLS film.split-ring
Inside the ASR slit (c),
figure array.
the (c) ASR
black structure
plot labeled computed
i: with GLSoptical absorption
flat film, the blue
plot labeled ii: when the GLS also fills the slits in the gold; the red plot labeled iii: solid andfilm,
spectra without GLS film. Inside the figure (c), the black plot labeled i: with GLS flat the
dashed
blue plot
lines referlabeled ii: when
to the GLS phasestheofGLS also fills A
amorphous the slits
and in the gold;
crystalline the red plot labeled
C, respectively. iii: solid
(Reprinted and
with per-
dashed lines
mission withrefer to the
Rights GLS phases
managed by AIP of amorphous
Publishing)A(B). andElectro-optic
crystalline C,behavior
respectively. (Reprinted
of the with
graphic flake
display:
permissionin positive NLCmanaged
with Rights (a,b) andby (c,d)
AIPinPublishing)
negative NLC, (B). before and after
Electro-optic applying
behavior an graphic
of the electric field.
flake
(e,f) Showing
display: the reorientation
in positive NLC (a,b) and of a (c,d)
graphitic flake inNLC,
in negative the negative dielectric
before and anisotropy
after applying anLC as a result
electric field.
of theShowing
(e,f) appliedtheelectric field (Reprinted
reorientation with permission
of a graphitic flake in the from OSAdielectric
negative Publishing).
anisotropy LC as a result
of the applied electric field (Reprinted with permission from OSA Publishing).
5.3. Phase-Change Metadevices
5.3. Phase-Change
For decades,Metadevices
semiconductor chalcogenide functionality has been used on optical
disksFor decades, semiconductor
supported by a change from chalcogenide
amorphous functionality has been
to crystalline used of
phases on aoptical disks
rewritable
supportedfunction.
memory by a change
Thefrom amorphous
features to crystalline
of polymorphic metalsphases
alsoof a rewritable
provide memory
a method function.
of obtaining
The featuresfast
nanoscale, of polymorphic
and energy-saving metals optical
also provide a method of
and plasmonic obtainingdevices
switching nanoscale, fast and
during this
energy-saving
phase change.optical and plasmonic
The changes switching
are dependent ondevices during this phase change.regime
the stimulation/containment The changes
of the
are dependent
medium, and mayon the
be stimulation/containment
either reversible or irreversibleregime[96].of the medium,
Within an Aland may benonlin-
network, either
reversible or irreversible [96]. Within an Al network, nonlinear optical
ear optical and nonlinear plasmon nanocomposite material were developed through the and nonlinear plasmon
nanocompositeofmaterial
introduction were developed
grain-boundary galliumthrough
(Ga) the introduction
[118,119]. In this of grain-boundary gallium
context, two different
(Ga)
phases[118,119].
of gallium In this context, two
intermediate different triggered
coexistence phases of constant
gallium intermediate
and reversible coexistence
changes.
triggered
This constant
optical and reversible changes.
and temperature-sensitive This optical
composite and temperature-sensitive
metamaterial, composite
formulates a mirror-like
metamaterial,
interface formulates
to silica a mirror-like
and exhibits interface
an extremely to silica and
broadband exhibits anresponse
transitional extremelytobroadband
an optical
transitional response
excitement [2,120,121]. to an optical excitement [2,120,121].
Figure 11
Figure 11 shows
shows aa conceptual
conceptualillustration
illustrationofofmultistate
multistateswitchable
switchablephotonic
photonicspin–orbit
spin–or-
interactions that enable the conversion of various types of spin angular
bit interactions that enable the conversion of various types of spin angular momentum momentum (SAM)
and orbital angular momentum (OAM) by controlling the level
(SAM) and orbital angular momentum (OAM) by controlling the level of crystallization of crystallization of the
Gethe
of 2 Sb2Ge
Te25Sb
alloy (GST) [122]. In symmetric and asymmetric modes, pseudo and real data can
2Te5 alloy (GST) [122]. In symmetric and asymmetric modes, pseudo and real
be coded, in conjunction
data can be coded, in conjunction with the degree
with theof spin freedom.
degree of spinThe metasurfaces
freedom. are interpreted
The metasurfaces are
interpreted in the amorphous state by a simple geometric phase (Pancharatnam–Berry
phase) [123], which leads to symmetrical SAM-to-OAM convert. A suitable stimulus is
needed to interpret the accurate information to excite the GST phase transition from the
amorphous to semi-crystalline state. Therefore, along with the geometric phase, a propa-
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 14 of 32
Figure11.11.(A).
Figure The
(A). active
The SAM-to-OAM
active SAM-to-OAM schematic
schematicconversion
conversion schematic
schematic activated with
activated thethe
with suggested
sug-
gested metasurface
metasurface phase change.
phase change. The crystallization
The crystallization level oflevel
GSTofcan
GSTbecan be changed
changed amongamong
thesethese
threethree
modes.
modes.
(B). (B).fabricated
(a) The (a) The fabricated converter’s
converter’s SEM images.
SEM images. (b–d)(b–d) Diffraction
Diffraction patterns
patterns under
under RCPRCP (top)and
(top)
and LCP (bottom) illuminating at various crystallization stages. (e,f) Interference patterns generated
LCP (bottom) illuminating at various crystallization stages. (e,f) Interference patterns generated by
by interference with the OAM beams shown in (b,c) and the titled Gaussian beam, which is circu-
interference with(Reprinted
larly polarized the OAM beams shown in from
with permission (b,c) and
Johnthe titled
Wiley Gaussian
and Sons and beam, whichClearance
Copyright is circularly
polarized
Center). (Reprinted with permission from John Wiley and Sons and Copyright Clearance Center).
Figure 12. Two-dimensional perovskite ultrafast measurement of. (A) Three-dimensional perov-
Figure 12. Two-dimensional perovskite ultrafast measurement of. (A) Three-dimensional perovskite
skite (black solid curve), mixed 3D–2D perovskite (red solid curve), and pure 2D perovskite (blue
(black solid curve), mixed 3D–2D perovskite (red solid curve), and pure 2D perovskite (blue solid
solid curve) thin films free carrier excitation and relaxation dynamics. Using a 400 nm pump beam
curve) thin films
at 750 μJ/cm 2, thinfree carrier
films excitation and
are photoexcited. (B)relaxation dynamics.
Two-dimensional Using a crystal
perovskite 400 nmstructure’s
pump beam at
sche-
750 µJ/cm 2 , thin films are photoexcited. (B) Two-dimensional perovskite crystal structure’s schematic
matic that makes QWs. (C) Scheme of the quantum confining of the pure 2D perovskite in the QW
that makes(D)
structure QWs. The(C) Schemeexample
artistical of the quantum confining of the pure
of the perovskite-coated 2D perovskite
hybrid metadevicein the
withQW structure
spin-coated
2D The
(D) perovskite
artistical (thickness
example of 60the
nm) on top of TASRhybrid
perovskite-coated and photo-excited withspin-coated
metadevice with a 400 THz 2Doptical pump
perovskite
beam. (E) THz electric field transmission (blue solid line) and THz photomodulation
(thickness 60 nm) on top of TASR and photo-excited with a 400 THz optical pump beam. (E) THz pulse ΔE(t) at
τpump = 1.5 ps (red solid curve) and 20 ps (green solid line) measured in the 2D perovskite
electric field transmission (blue solid line) and THz photomodulation pulse ∆E(t) at τpump = 1.5 ps thin film
(Reprinted with permission from Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CC
(red solid curve) and 20 ps (green solid line) measured in the 2D perovskite thin film (Reprinted with
BY-NC)).
permission from Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC)).
5.5. Nonlinear
5.5. Nonlinear Metadevices
Metadevices with
with Varactors
Varactors
By exploiting
By exploiting the
the nonlinear
nonlinear behavior
behavior ofof lumped
lumped elements
elements incorporated into LHMs,
metamaterials can
metamaterials can be
betailored.
tailored.Analogous
Analogous approaches
approaches have been
have developed
been developed for other met-
for other
amaterial systems.
metamaterial ForFor
systems. instance, if positioned
instance, if positionedatata amaximum
maximumpoint pointininthe
the electrical
electrical field,
split-ring metamolecule
split-ring metamolecule resonance can be modified by the the addition
addition ofof aa series
series varactor
varactor
diode with
diode with the
the resonator
resonator distributed
distributed capacitance.
capacitance. A split
split ring
ring with
with embedded
embedded varactor
varactor
presentssecond-
presents second-andandthird-order
third-order nonlinearity
nonlinearity at low
at low powers,
powers, whilewhile the nonlinear
the nonlinear response re-
becomes multivalued
sponse becomes or bistable
multivalued at higher
or bistable powers.
at higher In Figure
powers. 13, a nonlinear
In Figure operating
13, a nonlinear oper-
magnetic metamaterial
ating magnetic is shown.
metamaterial For obtaining
is shown. the tunability
For obtaining of metamaterials
the tunability of metamaterials in a in
mi-a
crowave
microwave domain,
domain,positive-intrinsic-negative
positive-intrinsic-negative (PIN) diodes
(PIN) or varactors
diodes are usually
or varactors inserted
are usually in-
into
sertedtheinto
passive particles
the passive compared
particles to different
compared tuning tuning
to different materials studiedstudied
materials in terahertz
in te-
range [113,138–140]. A tunable metamaterial absorber was suggested
rahertz range [113,138–140]. A tunable metamaterial absorber was suggested by by Zhao etZhao
al. [60]
et
using
al. [60]varactor diode and
using varactor diode theand
proposed absorber
the proposed tunability
absorber was confirmed
tunability was confirmedby 1.5by GHz
1.5
GHz bandwidth measurements. Figure 13A shows the designed tunable metamaterial,
which illustrates the structure of the particle wherein two similar electric-field-coupled-
LC (ELC) spots are printed with same orientation on the substrate. Two ELCs are con-
nected via varactor diode. As the structure resonant frequency is assessed using varactor
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 16 of 32
bandwidth measurements. Figure 13A shows the designed tunable metamaterial, which 16 of 3
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW
illustrates the structure of the particle wherein two similar electric-field-coupled-LC (ELC)
spots are printed with same orientation on the substrate. Two ELCs are connected via
varactor diode. As the structure resonant frequency is assessed using varactor diode lump
diode lumpunder
parameters, parameters,
different under
reversedifferent reverse
bias voltages bias voltages
the absorption the absorption
frequency frequency o
of the particle
the particle
keeps keeps on
on changing. Onchanging. Onbottom,
the substrate the substrate bottom,
the feeding the feeding
networks networks
are printed are printed
and are
and are used to communicate varactor diodes and feeding lines through
used to communicate varactor diodes and feeding lines through holes. Figure 13C shows holes. Figure 13C
the results
shows theofresults
the experiments as the biasas
of the experiments voltage varies
the bias from varies
voltage 0 to 19from
V, more
0 tothan 90%
19 V, more than
absorption rate with
90% absorption thewith
rate bandwidth 1.5 GHz from
the bandwidth 4.35 to
1.5 GHz 5.85 4.35
from GHzto is 5.85
achieved.
GHz is achieved.
Figure13.
Figure 13.(A)
(A) Proposed
Proposed metamaterial
metamaterial particle’s
particle’s structure.
structure. (B) Fabricated
(B) Fabricated sample
sample front front
view and view
the and th
varactordiodes
varactor diodes feed
feed network.
network. (C) (C) Absorption
Absorption rates rates at different
at different reversereverse bias voltages
bias voltages from 0 tofrom
19 V. 0 to 19 V
(Reprinted
(Reprinted under
under thethe Creative
Creative Commons
Commons Attribution
Attribution 3.0 license).
3.0 license).
as shown in Figure 14. One can customize a structure’s specific band gap by replicating the
periodicity of photonic crystals by establishing a pattern with repetitive domains, usually
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 33
holes in a hexagonal or square structure that alternates between high and low dielectric
constant materials.
Figure 15. One-dimensional binary photonic crystal (1DBPCs) (AB)N and one-dimensional ternary
photonic
Figure 15. crystal (ACB)N representation,
One-dimensional binary air iscrystal
photonic the background
(1DBPCs) (Reproduced
(AB)N(AB) courtesy of Theternary
and one-dimensional Electro-
Figure 15. One-dimensional
magnetics Academy).N binary photonic crystal (1DBPCs) N and one-dimensional ternary
photonic crystal
photonic crystal(ACB)
(ACB)Nrepresentation, air air
representation, is the background
is the (Reproduced
background courtesy
(Reproduced of The Electro-
courtesy of The Electro-
magnetics Academy).
magnetics Academy).
Photonic Band Gap Materials to Enhance Solar Cell Efficiency
PhotonicTheBand
mostGap Materials
widely usedtopower
Enhance Solar Cell
systems Efficiency
are photovoltaic solar energy conversion ones.
Photonic
However, Band Gap
these Materials
devices are to Enhance
suffering Solar
fromare Cell
relatively Efficiency
a lowsolar
conversion
The most widely used power systems photovoltaic energy efficiency.
conversionThis ones.is
dueThe
However, most
to the these widely
devicesused
wavelength mismatchpower
are suffering systems
between
from the are photovoltaic
narrow
relatively a wavelength solar
low conversion bandenergy conversion
associated
efficiency. with ones.
This
the energy gap in the semiconductor and the wide band of the sun’s
However, these devices are suffering from relatively a low conversion efficiency. This is
is due to the wavelength mismatch between the narrow wavelength(black bandbody) emission
associated
curve.
with
due to The
thethe loss of
energy gap
wavelengthenergy
in the issemiconductor
linked tobetween
mismatch long wavelength
andthethenarrow
widephotons
band with
of theless
wavelength sun’senergy
band(blackstimulat-
body) with
associated
emission
ingenergy
the curve.
the electron’s
gap inThe loss
holes
the of
allenergy
over the
semiconductor is linked
and to
energy long
gap
the wavelength
(i.e.,
wide losingof
band 20% photons
the in with
silicon)
sun’s lessbody)
and
(black energy
photonsemission
stimulating
having shortthe electron’s holes
wavelengths, all overpairs
stimulating the energy
with gap (i.e.,
energy overlosing
the gap20% in losing
(i.e., silicon)32%
andin
curve. The loss of energy is linked to long wavelength photons with less energy stimulat-
photons
silicon).having short wavelengths,
The efficiency stimulating pairs
of the thermophotovoltaic withsystem
(TPV) energymayoverbethe gap (i.e.,bylosing
increased using
ing the electron’s holes all over the energy gap (i.e., losing 20% in silicon) and photons
32% in silicon).
a spectrally The efficiency
dependent coupling of the thermophotovoltaic
between the absorber and (TPV)
the system may bethe
cell to recycle increased
photons
having
by using
with
short
a frequency
wavelengths,
a spectrally dependent
larger
stimulating
than thecoupling
band gap
pairs
between with
frequency
energy over
the absorber and
of the solar
theascell
the
cell,
gap to(i.e.,
shown
losing
recycle the 32% in
in Figure
silicon).
photons
16. The efficiency
with a frequencyoflarger
the thermophotovoltaic
than the band gap frequency (TPV) system maycell,
of the solar be increased
as shown inby using
aFigure
spectrally
16. dependent coupling between the absorber and the cell to recycle the photons
with a frequency larger than the band gap frequency of the solar cell, as shown in Figure
16.
Figure16.
Figure 16.Illustration
Illustrationofofaaconversion
conversionsystem
systemfor
forTPV
TPVenergy.
energy.The
Thethermal
thermalradiation
radiationofofthe
thesun
sunheats
heats
anintermediate
an intermediateabsorber.
absorber.Filter-transmitted
Filter-transmittedradiation
radiationfrom
fromthe
theemitter
emitterilluminate
illuminatethe
thephotovoltaic
photovoltaic
(PV)cell.
(PV) cell.
Figure 16. Illustration of a conversion system for TPV energy. The thermal radiation of the sun heats
an intermediate absorber. Filter-transmitted radiation from the emitter illuminate the photovoltaic
(PV) cell.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 19 of 32
In this approach, materials of the specific PBG are designed in such a way to obtain
highly efficient solar cells [141,145]. These are a new class of periodic materials which
enable accurate control of all properties of EMWs [144,172]. A PBG, similar to the electronic
band gap in semiconductor crystals, occurs in a periodic dielectric or metallic media. The
electromagnetic radiation light cannot propagate within the PBG spectral range. Through
the engineering of the photonic dispersion relationship, the ability to tailor the properties
of the electromagnetic radiation in a prescribed way allows the design of systems that
accurately control the emission and absorption of light. This gives rise to new phenomena
including inhibition and enhancement of spontaneous emission [145], strong localiza-
tion of light [141], formation of atom-photon bound states [173], quantum interference
effects in spontaneous emission [174], single atom and collective atomic switching behav-
ior through coherent resonant pumping and atomic reversal without fluctuations [175].
Feng et al. [176] reported the performance improvement of a near-field TVP device by
a back surface reflector. As photonic crystals are the leading candidates for frequency-
and angular-selective radiating elements in TPV devices. Therefore, employment of such
photonic crystal-based angle- and frequency-selective absorbers facilitates a strong en-
hancement of the conversion efficiency of solar cell devices without using concentrators.
The increment in efficiency is different for different materials, strategy (i.e., used as emitter,
absorber or reflector) and temperature of the cell/system. As a matter of fact, using as
back surface reflector (BSF), efficiency increased from 16.4% to 21% and power output has
increased by 10%. Bierman et al. [177] reported for solar TPV, the 6.8% efficiency increase
of the solar-to-electrical by pairing a one-dimensional SI/SiO2 photonic crystal selective
thermal emitter and a tandem plasma-interference optical filter by spectral enhancement.
Bhatt et al. [178] reported a STPV system with the overall conversion efficiency of 8.4% by
using a nanostructure-based spectrally selective emitter/absorber. The spectral properties
of the emitter were optimized to maximize the output power density from the TPV cells.
Changes in the spontaneous emission rate of atoms inside the photonic crystal struc-
ture in turn determine significant changes in thermal radiative processes. Thermal radiation
is simply thermally driven by spontaneous emission and in thermal equilibrium with its
surrounding material. In 1999, Cornelius and Dowling proposed the use of PBG materials
to alter thermal emission [179]. Two alternative approaches were explored: a method
based on a passive lossless PBG thin-film coating over the absorber, and an approach using
an active PBG material made from an absorbent medium. In 2000, the thermal emission
modification was experimentally demonstrated using a thin 3D photonic crystal slab on
a silicon substratum [180]. Pralle et al. [181] used a PBG technique to prove a thermally
excited, narrow-band, mid-infrared source. Recently, researchers at Sandia Labs demon-
strated a high-efficiency TPV system using tungsten photonic crystals [182,183]. These
studies suggest that it is possible to achieve dramatic modifications of Planck’s black body
radiation spectrum by optimizing the coupling of the multi-mode radiation field of a PBG
material and a spatially extended collection of atomic or electronic emitters [179,182]. The
thermal emission of radiation is strongly suppressed in the PBG spectral range, whereas
the thermal emission of radiation is resonantly increased up to the black-body limit for
specific frequencies in the permitted photonic bands which correspond to the transmission
resonances of the photonic crystal.
For important technological applications, such as low-threshold micro-lasers [18,184],
ultra-fast all-optical switches and micro-transistors [185–187], these remarkable phenomena
have attracted considerable interest.
material that has a negative but otherwise similar refractive index to the material of the
solar cell with the same impedance. This is critical for improving the absorption across
the interested spectral domain. Even though, the material assumed with idealistic prop-
erties cannot be obtained; therefore, nanostructures such as photonic crystals engineered
for dispersion, can be manipulated by actual application. Their optical response may be
comparable to the desired within the acceptable spectral range.
In solar cells the photon management contributes to improving spectrally and spatially
the absorption of the incident sunlight [191,192]. This concept was under active investiga-
tion during the last decade. In this respect, numerous advanced micro- and nano-optical
principles have been extended efficaciously to the photovoltaic domain. It usually goes
further than conventional methodologies in which the incident of sunlight is only dis-
persed in macroscopic structures in order to maximize the efficacious path length [193,194].
Concepts used in these new methods are namely photonic crystals [195,196], metallic
nanoparticles [197–199], waveguides [200,201] and diverse nanoshapes [202–204]. In the
end, all these approaches focus on reducing PV material thickness without performance
degradation. This minimizes recombination losses in volume, reduces material usage
and accelerates the deposition time, whereas maintaining the level of absorption remains
sufficiently high. Metamaterial’s field may allow a degree of freedom to work along two
directions, such as properties for a specific structure are assessed and implemented for
other purposes, e.g., to change the local state density [205] or to increase absorption [49,206].
On the other hand, a lot of essential work has been achieved in the opposite direction.
frequencies, and the planar metamaterial was even able to generate a resonant transparency
in the terahertz spectrum due to the excitation of the anapole mode.
Zhang et al. [209] proposed a scheme based on a microelectromechanical system
(MEMS) to reconfigure the resonance and radiation phase via control of each dipolar ele-
ment. The suspension angle of the individual bimorph cantilever in air can be precisely
controlled through electrostatic actuation that determines the operative phase diagram of
the metadevice. The dynamic polarization conversion is demonstrated through global con-
trol. In addition, it is proposed that a multifunctional operation such as dynamic wavefront
deflection and rewritable holographic display can be accomplished by using 1D and 2D con-
trol of the cantilever array when each cantilever in the MEMS metadevice array is uniformly
and accurately controlled in the large-area samples [5]. Such a rewritable proposition can
enable a myriad of applications of MEMS-based metadevices in polarization-division multi-
plexing and dynamic flat lenses. As an alternative, microelectromechanical system (MEMS)
metamaterials have enabled the dynamic control of electromagnetic waves ranging from
microwave to infrared through thermal bimorphs, comb drives, out-of-plane deformable
cantilevers and electrostatically actuated beams [210].
be induced by both incident electric and magnetic fields. Likewise, magnetic polarization
and magnetic current can be induced also by external electric field. Bianisotropy is not
always attributed to spatial dispersion. Alternatively, nonreciprocal bianisotropic effects
can be achieved, for example, in composites containing both magnetically and electrically
polarizable components which are coupled via their reactive fields and experience influence
of some external time-odd bias field or force [222–224]. Nonreciprocal bianisotropic meta-
surfaces can be used to design, for instance, various types of isolators with simultaneous
control of amplitude and polarization of transmitted waves [222–224].
9. Summary
The development of active metasurfaces and metamaterials to replace conventional
optical elements is still in its early stages, although the field of metasurfaces is rather well
established. In this review, we have reported the most recent and most relevant literature
works related to the exciting field of metamaterials. Focus was put on metamaterials
classification, evolution of metasurfaces, emerging metadevices and their mechanism of
functioning. Traditional and new emerging fabrication techniques for metasurfaces are
summarized with their associated advantages and limitations. Similarly, 3D metamaterial
fabrication has been discussed. We have shed light onto photonic band gap tuning via the
use of different metasurfaces to improve the absorption spectrum for specific applications
such as enhancing solar cell efficiency. In photovoltaics, the level of light absorption can be
commonly achieved by reducing the thickness of the absorption layer and minimizing the
recombination losses. We have seen that these recommendations might be achieved through
use of photonic crystals, metallic nanoparticles, waveguides and diverse nanoshapes. Thus,
the door to metamaterials is fully opened now for the achievement of tangible innovative
optoelectronic devices.
Author Contributions: All the authors have equal contributions. A.A. has gathered the relevant
and up-to-date data for preparing the manuscript by arranging the most recent publications. B.A.
conceptualized the idea for preparing the review paper, participated in writing and revised the
manuscript. A.M. has contributed to calculations and write up of the first version of this paper. All
authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research is funded by Qatar National Research Fund (A member of Qatar Foundation)
through NPRP grant # NPRP11S-0117-180330.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 24 of 32
References
1. Veselago, V.G. The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and µ. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 1968, 10,
509–514. [CrossRef]
2. Boyarsky, M.; Sleasman, T.; Pulido-Mancera, L.; Fromenteze, T.; Pedross-Engel, A.; Watts, C.; Imani, M.; Reynolds, M.; Smith, D.
Synthetic aperture radar with dynamic metasurface antennas: A conceptual development. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis.
2017, 34, A22–A36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Hsu, H.-T.; Chang, T.-W.; Yang, T.-J.; Chu, B.-H.; Wu, C.-J. Analysis of Wave Properties in Photonic Crystal Narrowband Filters
with Left-Handed Defect. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2010, 24, 2285–2298. [CrossRef]
4. Lou, J.; Liang, J.; Yu, Y.; Ma, H.; Yang, R.; Fan, Y.; Wang, G.; Cai, T. Silicon-Based Terahertz Meta-Devices for Electrical Modulation
of Fano Resonance and Transmission Amplitude. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 18, 2000449. [CrossRef]
5. Kumar, A.; Solanki, A.; Manjappa, M.; Ramesh, S.; Srivastava, Y.K.; Agarwal, P.; Sum, T.C.; Singh, R. Excitons in 2D perovskites
for ultrafast terahertz photonic devices. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaax8821. [CrossRef]
6. Walser, R. Metamaterials: What are they? What are they good for? Acta Obs. Gynecol Scand. 2018, 97, 388–393. [CrossRef]
7. Gupta, T.K.; Singh, B.P.; Singh, V.N.; Teotia, S.; Singh, A.P.; Elizabeth, I.; Dhakate, S.R.; Dhawan, S.K.; Mathur, R.B. MnO2
decorated graphene nanoribbons with superior permittivity and excellent microwave shielding properties. J. Mater. Chem. A
2014, 2, 4256–4263. [CrossRef]
8. Singh, A.P.; Mishra, M.; Sambyal, P.; Gupta, B.K.; Singh, B.P.; Chandra, A.; Dhawan, S.K. Encapsulation of γ-Fe2 O3 decorated
reduced graphene oxide in polyaniline core-shell tubes as an exceptional tracker for electromagnetic environmental pollution. J.
Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3581–3593. [CrossRef]
9. Langenbucher, A. Law of Refraction (Snell’s Law) BT—Encyclopedia of Ophthalmology; Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Kohnen, T., Eds.; Springer:
Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; p. 1042, ISBN 978-3-540-69000-9.
10. Duan, Z.; Tang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, M.; Gong, Y. Observation of the reversed Cherenkov radiation. Nat.
Commun. 2017, 8, 14901. [CrossRef]
11. Xu, J.; Jia, D.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Yu, X. Tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber actuated by thermomechanical bimaterial
microcantilevers. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 10329–10336. [CrossRef]
12. Gang, Q.; Wang, J.; Yan, M.-B.; Wei, C.; Chen, H.Y.; Li, Y.F. Lowering plasma frequency by enhancing the effective mass of
electrons: A route to deep sub-wavelength metamaterials. Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 87302. [CrossRef]
13. Pendry, J.B.; Holden, A.J.; Robbins, D.J.; Stewart, W.J. Low frequency plasmons in thin-wire structures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter
1998, 10, 4785–4809. [CrossRef]
14. Wu, C.-T. A real-time multiple target detecting scheme based on microwave metamaterials. In Proceedings of the 45th European
Microwave Conference (EuMC), Paris, France, 7–10 September 2015; pp. 1519–1522.
15. Zheludev, N.I. The Road Ahead for Metamaterials. Science 2010, 328, 582–583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Chen, Z.; Guo, B.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, C. Metamaterials-based enhanced energy harvesting: A review. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2014,
438, 1–8. [CrossRef]
17. Fischer, S.C.L.; Hillen, L.; Eberl, C. Mechanical Metamaterials on the Way from Laboratory Scale to Industrial Applications:
Challenges for Characterization and Scalability. Materials 2020, 13, 3605. [CrossRef]
18. Painter, O.; Lee, R.K.; Scherer, A.; Yariv, A.; Brien, J.D.; Dapkus, P.D.; Kim, I. Two-Dimensional Photonic Band-Gap Defect Mode
Laser. Science 1999, 284, 1819–1821. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Bauer, C.; Giessen, H. Light harvesting enhancement in solar cells with quasicrystalline plasmonic structures. Opt. Express 2013,
21, A363–A371. [CrossRef]
20. Pala, R.A.; White, J.; Barnard, E.; Liu, J.; Brongersma, M.L. Design of Plasmonic Thin-Film Solar Cells with Broadband Absorption
Enhancements. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3504–3509. [CrossRef]
21. Iqbal, M.; Nauman, M.M.; Khan, F.U.; Abas, P.E.; Cheok, Q.; Iqbal, A.; Aissa, B. Vibration-based piezoelectric, electromagnetic,
and hybrid energy harvesters for microsystems applications: A contributed review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 45, 65–102. [CrossRef]
22. Kim, J.; Rana, A.S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, I.; Badloe, T.; Zubair, M.; Mehmood, M.Q.; Rho, J. Chiroptical Metasurfaces: Principles,
Classification, and Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 4381. [CrossRef]
23. Cummer, S.; Christensen, J.; Alù, A. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16001. [CrossRef]
24. Vicari, A.; Holman, M.; Schiavo, A. Metamaterials Market Forecast, 2019. Available online: https://web.luxresearchinc.com/
hubfs/Press%20Release%20Assets/Lux%20Research%20Metamaterials%20Market%20Forecast%20Executive%20Summary.
pdf (accessed on 1 January 2021).
25. Pendry, J.B. Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 3966–3969. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Leonhardt, U. Invisibility cup. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 207–208. [CrossRef]
27. Grebenchukov, A.; Masyukov, M.; Zaitsev, A.; Khodzitsky, M. Asymmetric graphene metamaterial for narrowband terahertz
modulation. Opt. Commun. 2020, 476, 126299. [CrossRef]
28. Modi, A.Y.; Balanis, C.A.; Birtcher, C.R.; Shaman, H.N. Novel Design of Ultrabroadband Radar Cross Section Reduction Surfaces
Using Artificial Magnetic Conductors. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 5406–5417. [CrossRef]
29. Morawiec, S.; Crupi, I. Light trapping by plasmonic nanoparticles. In Solar Cells and Light Management: Materials, Strategies
and Sustainability; Enrichi, F., Righini, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Chapter 8; pp. 277–313, ISBN
978-0-08-102762-2.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 25 of 32
30. Uhrenfeldt, C.; Villesen, T.F.; Têtu, A.; Johansen, B.; Larsen, A.N. Broadband photocurrent enhancement and light-trapping in
thin film Si solar cells with periodic Al nanoparticle arrays on the front. Opt. Express 2015, 23, A525–A538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hongya, C.; Fan, Y. Wideband, co-polarization anomalous reflection metasurface based on low-Q
resonators. Appl. Phys. A 2016, 122, 851. [CrossRef]
32. Muhammad, N.; Khan, A.D. Tunable Fano Resonances and Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in All-Dielectric Holey
Block. Plasmonics 2015, 10, 1687–1693. [CrossRef]
33. Khan, A.D.; Amin, M.; Ali, A.; Khan, S.D.; Khan, R. Multiple higher-order Fano resonances in plasmonic hollow cylindrical
nanodimer. Appl. Phys. A 2015, 120, 641–649. [CrossRef]
34. Feng, M.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, J.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Hongya, C.; Sui, S.; Ma, H.; Qu, S. Two-dimensional Coding phase
gradient metasurface for RCS reduction. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 375103. [CrossRef]
35. Kang, E.; Chaharsoughi, M.; Rossi, S.; Jonsson, M. Hybrid plasmonic metasurfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 140901. [CrossRef]
36. Luo, X.; Pu, M.; Ma, X.; Li, X. Taming the Electromagnetic Boundaries via Metasurfaces: From Theory and Fabrication to
Functional Devices. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2015, 2015, 204127. [CrossRef]
37. Holloway, C.; Kuester, E.; Gordon, J.; O’Hara, J.; Booth, J.; Smith, D. An Overview of the Theory and Applications of Metasurfaces:
The Two-Dimensional Equivalents of Metamaterials. Antennas Propag. Mag. IEEE 2012, 54, 10–35. [CrossRef]
38. Bukhari, S.; Vardaxoglou, J.; Whittow, W. A Metasurfaces Review: Definitions and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2727.
[CrossRef]
39. Ladumor, M.; Charola, S.; Patel, S.; Dhasarathan, V. Graphene-based c-shaped metasurface broadband solar absorber. Proc. SPIE
2020, 11274. [CrossRef]
40. Quarfoth, R.; Sievenpiper, D. Artificial Tensor Impedance Surface Waveguides. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 3597–3606.
[CrossRef]
41. Maksimenko, O.; Shcherbinin, V.; Tkachenko, V. Coupled-Mode Theory of an Irregular Waveguide with Impedance Walls. J.
Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 2019, 40, 620–636. [CrossRef]
42. Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xing, L.; He, Z.; Sun, L. Broadband bifunctional Luneburg–Fisheye lens based on anisotropic metasurface. Sci.
Rep. 2020, 10, 20381. [CrossRef]
43. Taheri, M.L.; McGowan, S.; Nikolova, L.; Evans, J.E.; Teslich, N.; Lu, J.P.; LaGrange, T.; Rosei, F.; Siwick, B.J.; Browning, N.D. In
situ laser crystallization of amorphous silicon: Controlled nanosecond studies in the dynamic transmission electron microscope.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 032102. [CrossRef]
44. Chen, H.-T.; Taylor, A.J.; Yu, N. A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 76401. [CrossRef]
45. Alici, K.B.; Özbay, E. Radiation properties of a split ring resonator and monopole composite. Phys. Status Solidi 2007, 244,
1192–1196. [CrossRef]
46. Alici, K.B.; Serebryannikov, A.E.; Ozbay, E. Radiation Properties and Coupling Analysis of a Metamaterial Based, Dual Polariza-
tion, Dual Band, Multiple Split Ring Resonator Antenna. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2010, 24, 1183–1193. [CrossRef]
47. Xiao, S.; Wang, T.; Liu, T.; Chaobiao, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J. Active metamaterials and metadevices: A review. J. Phys. D Appl.
Phys. 2020, 53, 503002. [CrossRef]
48. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Pan, P.; Liu, X.; Fu, G.; Liu, Z.; Luo, H.; Liu, G. Semiconductor-nanoantenna-assisted solar absorber for ultra-
broadband light trapping. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 76. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Landy, N.I.; Sajuyigbe, S.; Mock, J.J.; Smith, D.R.; Padilla, W.J. Perfect Metamaterial Absorber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 207402.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Xiong, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X. Far-Field Optical Hyperlens Magnifying Sub-Diffraction-Limited Objects. Science
2007, 315, 1686. [CrossRef]
51. Nassar, H.; Chen, Y.Y.; Huang, G.L. Polar Metamaterials: A New Outlook on Resonance for Cloaking Applications. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 2020, 124, 84301. [CrossRef]
52. Cai, W.; Chettiar, U.K.; Kildishev, A.V.; Shalaev, V.M. Optical cloaking with metamaterials. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 224–227.
[CrossRef]
53. Jiang, L.; Chu, C.; Fang, B.; Zhang, M.; Gan, H.; Li, C.; Jing, X.; Hong, Z. Multi-wavelength carpet cloaking based on an ultrathin
single layer metamaterial microstructure. Laser Phys. Lett. 2020, 17, 66202. [CrossRef]
54. Karamanos, T.; Amanatiadis, S.; Zygiridis, T.; Kantartzis, N. Quadrupolarisability extraction for planar metamaterial scatterers
via far-field response. COMPEL-Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2020, 39, 647–657. [CrossRef]
55. Aïssa, B.; El Khakani, M.A. The channel length effect on the electrical performance of suspended-single-wall-carbon-nanotube-
based field effect transistors. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 175203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Lee, T.G.; Jo, S.-H.; Seung, H.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, E.; Youn, B.D.; Nahm, S.; Kim, M. Enhanced energy transfer and conversion for
high performance phononic crystal-assisted elastic wave energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2020, 105226. [CrossRef]
57. He, Q.; Sun, S.; Zhou, L. Tunable/Reconfigurable Metasurfaces: Physics and Applications. Research 2019, 2019, 1–16. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
58. Li, A.; Kim, S.; Luo, Y.; Li, Y.; Long, J.; Sievenpiper, D. High-Power Transistor-Based Tunable and Switchable Metasurface
Absorber. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 2810–2818. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 26 of 32
59. Zhang, D.; Wang, X. Generation of Tilted High-Order Bessel Beam in Millimeter Range Using Metasurface. In Proceedings of the
2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA,
7–12 July 2019.
60. Zhao, J.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, J.; Qi, M.Q.; Jiang, W.X.; Cui, T. A Tunable Metamaterial Absorber using Varactor Diodes. New J. Phys.
2013, 15, 43049. [CrossRef]
61. Habib, M.A.; Barkat, M.; Aissa, B.; Denidni, T. Ca-cfar detection performance of radar targets embedded in “non centered chi-2
gamma” clutter. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2008, 88, 135–148. [CrossRef]
62. Pande, S.; Kawitkar, R. A Review of Techniques to Design Tunable Antenna Covered with Metamaterial; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg,
Germany, 2020; pp. 9–20, ISBN 978-981-15-2925-2.
63. Fan, K.; Strikwerda, A.C.; Zhang, X.; Averitt, R.D. Three-dimensional broadband tunable terahertz metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B
2013, 87, 161104. [CrossRef]
64. Yang, D.; Xia, Y. Experimental verification of multi-band metamaterial absorber with double structured layers. Mater. Res. Express
2020, 7, 35801. [CrossRef]
65. Haschke, J.; Lemerle, R.; Aïssa, B.; Abdallah, A.A.; Kivambe, M.M.; Boccard, M.; Ballif, C. Annealing of silicon heterojunction
solar cells: Interplay of solar cell and indium tin oxide properties. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019, 9, 1202–1207. [CrossRef]
66. Kim, G.M.; van den Boogaart, M.A.F.; Brugger, J. Fabrication and application of a full wafer size micro/nanostencil for multiple
length-scale surface patterning. Microelectron. Eng. 2003, 67–68, 609–614. [CrossRef]
67. Tao, H.; Amsden, J.J.; Strikwerda, A.C.; Fan, K.; Kaplan, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Averitt, R.D.; Omenetto, F.G. Metamaterial Silk
Composites at Terahertz Frequencies. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3527–3531. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Qin, Y.; Pan, A.; Liu, L.; Moutanabbir, O.; Yang, R.B.; Knez, M. Atomic Layer Deposition Assisted Template Approach for
Electrochemical Synthesis of Au Crescent-Shaped Half-Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 788–794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Won, S.; Jung, H.-J.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.-H.; Van Lam, D.; Kim, H.-D.; Kim, K.-S.; Lee, S.-M.; Seo, M.; Kim, D.-S.; et al. Graphene-based
crack lithography for high-throughput fabrication of terahertz metamaterials. Carbon 2020, 158, 505–512. [CrossRef]
70. Gutruf, P.; Shah, C.M.; Walia, S.; Nili, H.; Zoolfakar, A.S.; Karnutsch, C.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Sriram, S.; Bhaskaran, M. Transparent
functional oxide stretchable electronics: Micro-tectonics enabled high strain electrodes. NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e62. [CrossRef]
71. Aksu, S.; Huang, M.; Artar, A.; Yanik, A.A.; Selvarasah, S.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Altug, H. Flexible Plasmonics on Unconventional and
Nonplanar Substrates. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4422–4430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
72. Chen, Y.; Ai, B.; Wong, Z.J. Soft optical metamaterials. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 18. [CrossRef]
73. Lee, M.H.; Huntington, M.D.; Zhou, W.; Yang, J.-C.; Odom, T.W. Programmable Soft Lithography: Solvent-Assisted Nanoscale
Embossing. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 311–315. [CrossRef]
74. Chanda, D.; Shigeta, K.; Gupta, S.; Cain, T.; Carlson, A.; Mihi, A.; Baca, A.J.; Bogart, G.R.; Braun, P.; Rogers, J.A. Large-area
flexible 3D optical negative index metamaterial formed by nanotransfer printing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 402–407. [CrossRef]
75. Scheuer, J. Optical Metasurfaces Are Coming of Age: Short- and Long-Term Opportunities for Commercial Applications. ACS
Photonics 2020, 7, 1323–1354. [CrossRef]
76. Liu, N.; Guo, H.; Fu, L.; Kaiser, S.; Schweizer, H.; Giessen, H. Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies.
Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 31–37. [CrossRef]
77. Bordjiba, T.; Mohamedi, M.; Dao, L.H.; Aissa, B.; El Khakani, M.A. Enhanced physical and electrochemical properties of
nanostructured carbon nanotubes coated microfibrous carbon paper. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 441, 88–93. [CrossRef]
78. Kim, M.; Rho, J. Metamaterials and imaging. Nano Converg. 2015, 2, 22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Zhang, X.; Liu, Z. Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 435–441. [CrossRef]
80. Leonhardt, U.; Philbin, T. Quantum Levitation by Left-handed Metamaterials. New J. Phys. 2006, 9, 254. [CrossRef]
81. Peralta, X.G.; Wanke, M.C.; Arrington, C.L.; Williams, J.D.; Brener, I.; Strikwerda, A.; Averitt, R.D.; Padilla, W.J.; Smirnova, E.;
Taylor, A.J.; et al. Large-area metamaterials on thin membranes for multilayer and curved applications at terahertz and higher
frequencies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 161113. [CrossRef]
82. Ali, A.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Abdala, A.; Urbankowski, P.; Zhao, M.Q.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Aïssa, B.; Mahmoud, K.A. Effect
of synthesis on performance of MXene/iron oxide anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Langmuir 2018, 34, 11325–11334.
[CrossRef]
83. Shao, D.B.; Chen, S.C. Direct Patterning of Three-Dimensional Periodic Nanostructures by Surface-Plasmon-Assisted Nanolithog-
raphy. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2279–2283. [CrossRef]
84. Wei, F.; Lu, D.; Shen, H.; Wan, W.; Ponsetto, J.L.; Huang, E.; Liu, Z. Wide Field Super-Resolution Surface Imaging through
Plasmonic Structured Illumination Microscopy. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 4634–4639. [CrossRef]
85. Pryce, I.M.; Aydin, K.; Kelaita, Y.A.; Briggs, R.M.; Atwater, H.A. Highly Strained Compliant Optical Metamaterials with Large
Frequency Tunability. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4222–4227. [CrossRef]
86. Xu, X.; Yang, Q.; Wattanatorn, N.; Zhao, C.; Stewart, L.A.; Jonas, S.J.; Weiss, P.S. Methods for Multiple-Patterning Nanosphere
Lithography for Fabrication of Periodic Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Nanostructures. U.S. Patent 20,200,098,577A1, 1 April 2020.
87. Aïssa, B.; Therriault, D.; Farahani, R.D.; Lebel, L.L.; El Khakani, M.A. Electrical transport properties of single wall carbon nan-
otube/polyurethane composite based field effect transistors fabricated by UV-assisted direct-writing technology. Nanotechnology
2012, 23, 115705. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 27 of 32
88. Lebel, L.L.; Aïssa, B.; El Khakani, M.A.; Therriault, D. Ultraviolet-assisted direct-write fabrication of carbon nanotube/polymer
nanocomposite micro-coils. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 592. [CrossRef]
89. Burckel, D.B.; Sinclair, M.B. Modeling study of multi-layer 3D metamaterials. Proc. SPIE 2011, 8093, 809317. [CrossRef]
90. Lio, G.E.; Ferraro, A.; Ritacco, T.; Aceti, D.; De Luca, A.; Giocondo, M.; Caputo, R. Leveraging on ENZ Metamaterials to Achieve
2D and 3D Hyper-Resolution in Two-Photon Direct Laser Writing. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2008644. [CrossRef]
91. Chu, C.H.; Tseng, M.L.; Chen, J.; Wu, P.C.; Chen, Y.-H.; Wang, H.-C.; Chen, T.-Y.; Hsieh, W.T.; Wu, H.J.; Sun, G.; et al. Active
dielectric metasurface based on phase-change medium. Laser Photonics Rev. 2016, 10, 986–994. [CrossRef]
92. Zhou, Z.; Wang, S.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Feng, L. High performance metamaterials-high electron mobility transistors integrated
terahertz modulator. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 17832–17840. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
93. de Galarreta, C.R.; Alexeev, A.M.; Au, Y.-Y.; Lopez-Garcia, M.; Klemm, M.; Cryan, M.; Bertolotti, J.; Wright, C.V. Nonvolatile
Reconfigurable Phase-Change Metadevices for Beam Steering in the Near Infrared. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704993.
[CrossRef]
94. Ali, A.; Jo, J.; Yang, Y.J.; Choi, K.H. Direct fabrication of graphene/zinc oxide composite film and its characterizations. Appl. Phys.
A 2014, 114, 323–330. [CrossRef]
95. Lee, K.-T.; Park, D.H.; Baac, H.W.; Han, S. Graphene- and Carbon-Nanotube-Based Transparent Electrodes for Semitransparent
Solar Cells. Materials 2018, 11, 1503. [CrossRef]
96. Minovich, A.; Farnell, J.; Neshev, D.N.; McKerracher, I.; Karouta, F.; Tian, J.; Powell, D.A.; Shadrivov, I.V.; Tan, H.H.; Jagadish, C.
Liquid crystal based nonlinear fishnet metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 121113. [CrossRef]
97. Lee, C.-W.; Choi, H.J.; Jeong, H. Tunable metasurfaces for visible and SWIR applications. Nano Converg. 2020, 7, 3. [CrossRef]
98. Vest, B. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016. US EIA
LCOE 2016, 1–20.
99. Maeda, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Fukutomi, M.; Asano, T. A New High-TcOxide Superconductor without a Rare Earth Element. Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys. 1988, 27, L209–L210. [CrossRef]
100. Kumar, S.; Lee, H.P. The Present and Future Role of Acoustic Metamaterials for Architectural and Urban Noise Mitigations.
Acoustics 2019, 1, 590–607. [CrossRef]
101. Ou, J.Y.; Plum, E.; Jiang, L.; Zheludev, N.I. Reconfigurable Photonic Metamaterials. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2142–2144. [CrossRef]
102. Rong, J.; Ye, W.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Frequency-Coded Passive Multifunctional Elastic Metasurfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020,
30, 2005285. [CrossRef]
103. Shirmanesh, G.K.; Sokhoyan, R.; Wu, P.C.; Atwater, H.A. Electro-optically Tunable Multifunctional Metasurfaces. ACS Nano 2020,
14, 6912–6920. [CrossRef]
104. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Jian, J.; Rutherford, B.X.; Gao, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H. Metal-Free Oxide-Nitride Heterostructure as a
Tunable Hyperbolic Metamaterial Platform. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 6614–6622. [CrossRef]
105. Zahra, S.; Ma, L.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Chen, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, N.; Huang, Y.; Wen, G. Electromagnetic Metasurfaces and
Reconfigurable Metasurfaces: A Review. Front. Phys. 2021, 8. [CrossRef]
106. Tao, H.; Strikwerda, A.C.; Fan, K.; Padilla, W.J.; Zhang, X.; Averitt, R.D. Reconfigurable Terahertz Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett.
2009, 103, 147401. [CrossRef]
107. He, X.; Lv, Z.; Liu, B.; Li, Z. Tunable magnetic metamaterial based multi-split-ring resonator (MSRR) using MEMS switch
components. Microsyst. Technol. 2011, 17, 1263–1269. [CrossRef]
108. Zhu, W.M.; Liu, A.Q.; Zhang, X.M.; Tsai, D.P.; Bourouina, T.; Teng, J.H.; Zhang, X.H.; Guo, H.C.; Tanoto, H.; Mei, T.; et al.
Switchable Magnetic Metamaterials Using Micromachining Processes. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1792–1796. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
109. Yao, D.; Yan, K.; Liu, X.; Liao, S.; Yu, Y.; Lin, Y.-S. Tunable terahertz metamaterial by using asymmetrical double split-ring
resonators (ADSRRs). OSA Contin. 2018, 1, 349–357. [CrossRef]
110. Chen, H.-T.; Padilla, W.J.; Zide, J.M.O.; Gossard, A.C.; Taylor, A.J.; Averitt, R.D. Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature
2006, 444, 597–600. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
111. Wu, J.; Wang, Y. Optical Absorption and Thermal Effects of Plasmonic Nanostructures. In Nanoplasmonics: Fundamentals and
Applications; Intech Open: London, UK, 2017; Chapter 7; pp. 157–171. [CrossRef]
112. Sámson, Z.L.; MacDonald, K.F.; De Angelis, F.; Gholipour, B.; Knight, K.; Huang, K.C.-C.; Di Fabrizio, E.; Hewak, D.W.; Zheludev, N.I.
Metamaterial electro-optic switch of nanoscale thickness. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 143105. [CrossRef]
113. Tie, W.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Lim, Y.; Sang Won, L.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S. Dynamic electro-optic response of graphene/graphitic
flakes in nematic liquid crystals. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 19867–19879. [CrossRef]
114. Shrekenhamer, D.; Rout, S.; Strikwerda, A.C.; Bingham, C.; Averitt, R.D.; Sonkusale, S.; Padilla, W.J. High speed terahertz
modulation from metamaterials with embedded high electron mobility transistors. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 9968–9975. [CrossRef]
115. Yan, H.; Li, X.; Chandra, B.; Tulevski, G.; Wu, Y.; Freitag, M.; Zhu, W.; Avouris, P.; Xia, F. Tunable infrared plasmonic devices
using graphene/insulator stacks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 330–334. [CrossRef]
116. Xiao, B.; Tong, S.; Fyffe, A.; Shi, Z. Tunable electromagnetically induced transparency based on graphene metamaterials. Opt.
Express 2020, 28, 4048–4057. [CrossRef]
117. Ju, L.; Geng, B.; Horng, J.; Girit, C.; Martin, M.; Hao, Z.; Bechtel, H.A.; Liang, X.; Zettl, A.; Shen, Y.R.; et al. Graphene plasmonics
for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 630–634. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 28 of 32
118. Bennett, P.J.; Dhanjal, S.; Petropoulos, P.; Richardson, D.J.; Zheludev, N.I.; Emelyanov, V.I. A photonic switch based on a gigantic,
reversible optical nonlinearity of liquefying gallium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 1787–1789. [CrossRef]
119. Krasavin, A.V.; MacDonald, K.F.; Schwanecke, A.S.; Zheludev, N.I. Gallium/aluminum nanocomposite material for nonlinear
optics and nonlinear plasmonics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 31118. [CrossRef]
120. Boyarsky, M.; Sleasman, T.; Imani, M.; Gollub, J.; Smith, D. Electronically Steered Nyquist Metasurface Antenna. arXiv 2020,
arXiv:2007.01911.
121. Zheludev, N.I.; Kivshar, Y.S. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 917–924. [CrossRef]
122. Zhang, F.; Xie, X.; Pu, M.; Guo, Y.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Luo, J.; He, Q.; Yu, H.; Luo, X. Multistate Switching of Photonic Angular
Momentum Coupling in Phase-Change Metadevices. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908194. [CrossRef]
123. Hannonen, A.; Partanen, H.; Leinonen, A.; Heikkinen, J.; Hakala, T.K.; Friberg, A.T.; Setälä, T. Measurement of the Pancharatnam—
Berry phase in two-beam interference. Optica 2020, 7, 1435–1439. [CrossRef]
124. Devlin, R.C.; Ambrosio, A.; Rubin, N.A.; Mueller, J.P.B.; Capasso, F. Arbitrary spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion of
light. Science 2017, 358, 896–901. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
125. Balthasar Mueller, J.P.; Rubin, N.A.; Devlin, R.C.; Groever, B.; Capasso, F. Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase
Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 113901. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126. Zhang, F.; Pu, M.; Luo, J.; Yu, H.; Luo, X. Symmetry breaking of photonic spin-orbit interactions in metasurfaces. Opto-Electron.
Eng. 2017, 44, 319–325. [CrossRef]
127. Choi, C.; Lee, S.-Y.; Mun, S.-E.; Lee, G.-Y.; Sung, J.; Yun, H.; Yang, J.-H.; Kim, H.-O.; Hwang, C.-Y.; Lee, B. Metasurface with
nanostructured Ge2 Sb2 Te5 as a platform for broadband-operating wavefront switch. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900171. [CrossRef]
128. Li, J.; Kamin, S.; Zheng, G.; Neubrech, F.; Zhang, S.; Liu, N. Addressable metasurfaces for dynamic holography and optical
information encryption. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar6768. [CrossRef]
129. Yin, X.; Steinle, T.; Huang, L.; Taubner, T.; Wuttig, M.; Zentgraf, T.; Giessen, H. Beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing using
active plasmonic metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 2017, 6, e17016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
130. Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Sonnefraud, Y.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I.; Luo, X.; Hong, M.; Maier, S.A. Engineering the Phase Front of Light
with Phase-Change Material Based Planar lenses. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
131. Lin, H.; Sturmberg, B.C.P.; Lin, K.-T.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Chong, T.K.; de Sterke, C.M.; Jia, B. A 90-nm-thick graphene metamaterial
for strong and extremely broadband absorption of unpolarized light. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 270–276. [CrossRef]
132. Li, W.; Wang, P.; Yao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, H. Experimental investigation of 1D, 2D, and 3D metamaterials for efficiency
enhancement in a 6.78MHz wireless power transfer system. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8506. [CrossRef]
133. Chen, H.-T.; Padilla, W.J.; Zide, J.M.O.; Bank, S.R.; Gossard, A.C.; Taylor, A.J.; Averitt, R.D. Ultrafast optical switching of terahertz
metamaterials fabricated on ErAs/GaAs nanoisland superlattices. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 1620–1622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
134. Padilla, W.J.; Taylor, A.J.; Highstrete, C.; Lee, M.; Averitt, R.D. Dynamical Electric and Magnetic Metamaterial Response at
Terahertz Frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 107401. [CrossRef]
135. Nikolaenko, A.E.; Papasimakis, N.; Atmatzakis, E.; Luo, Z.; Shen, Z.X.; De Angelis, F.; Boden, S.A.; Di Fabrizio, E.; Zheludev, N.I.
Nonlinear graphene metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 181109. [CrossRef]
136. Nikolaenko, A.E.; De Angelis, F.; Boden, S.A.; Papasimakis, N.; Ashburn, P.; Di Fabrizio, E.; Zheludev, N.I. Carbon Nanotubes in
a Photonic Metamaterial. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 153902. [CrossRef]
137. Dani, K.M.; Ku, Z.; Upadhya, P.C.; Prasankumar, R.P.; Brueck, S.R.J.; Taylor, A.J. Subpicosecond Optical Switching with a Negative
Index Metamaterial. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3565–3569. [CrossRef]
138. Wu, R.Y.; Zhang, L.; Bao, L.; Wu, L.W.; Ma, Q.; Bai, G.D.; Wu, H.T.; Cui, T.J. Digital Metasurface with Phase Code and Reflection—
Transmission Amplitude Code for Flexible Full-Space Electromagnetic Manipulations. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801429.
[CrossRef]
139. Liu, S.; Xu, H.-X.; Zhang, H.C.; Cui, T.J. Tunable ultrathin mantle cloak via varactor-diode-loaded metasurface. Opt. Express 2014,
22, 13403–13417. [CrossRef]
140. Luo, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.G.; Wu, J.W.; Dai, J.Y.; Zhang LWu, H.T.; Zhang, H.C.; Ma, H.F.; Cheng, Q.; Cui, T.J. Intensity-
Dependent Metasurface with Digitally Reconfigurable Distribution of Nonlinearity. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900792. [CrossRef]
141. John, S. Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 2486–2489. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
142. Srivastava, R.; Thapa, K.; Pati, S.; Ojha, S. Omni-direction reflection in one dimensional photonic crystal. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B
2008, 7. [CrossRef]
143. Fink, Y.; Winn, J.N.; Fan, S.; Chen, C.; Michel, J.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Thomas, E.L. A dielectric omnidirectional reflector. Science
1998, 282, 1679–1682. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
144. Joannopoulos, J.D.; Meade, R.D.; Winn, J.N. Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed.; Princeton University Press:
Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995; ISBN 978-0-691-12456-8.
145. Yablonovitch, E. Inhibited Spontaneous Emission in Solid-State Physics and Electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 2059–2062.
[CrossRef]
146. Winn, J.N.; Fink, Y.; Fan, S.; Joannopoulos, J.D. Omnidirectional reflection from a one-dimensional photonic crystal. Opt. Lett.
1998, 23, 1573–1575. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 29 of 32
147. Deopura, M.; Ullal, C.K.; Temelkuran, B.; Fink, Y. Dielectric omnidirectional visible reflector. Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 1197–1199.
[CrossRef]
148. Xiang, Y.; Dai, X.; Wen, S.; Fan, D. Enlargement of zero averaged refractive index gaps in the photonic heterostructures containing
negative-index materials. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 76, 56604. [CrossRef]
149. Li, J.; Zhou, L.; Chan, C.T.; Sheng, P. Photonic Band Gap from a Stack of Positive and Negative Index Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett.
2003, 90, 83901. [CrossRef]
150. Xiang, Y.; Dai, X.; Wen, S.; Fan, D. Independently tunable omnidirectional multichannel filters based on the fractal multilayers
containing negative-index materials. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33, 1255–1257. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
151. Banerjee, A. Enhanced refractometric optical sensing by using one-dimensional ternary photonic crystals. Prog. Electromagn. Res.
2009, 89, 11–22. [CrossRef]
152. Xu, K.; Zheng, X.; She, W. Properties of defect modes in one-dimensional photonic crystals containing a defect layer with a
negative refractive index. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 6089–6091. [CrossRef]
153. Wu, C.-J.; Chu, B.-H.; Weng, M.-T. Analysis of Optical Reflection in a Chirped Distributed Bragg Reflector. J. Electromagn. Waves
Appl. 2009, 23, 129–138. [CrossRef]
154. Guida, G.; Priou, A. An Introduction to Photonic Band Gap (PBG)Materials. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2003, 41, 1–20. [CrossRef]
155. Ozbay, E.; Temelkuran, B.; Bayindir, M. Microwave Applications of Photonic Crystals. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2003, 41, 185–209.
[CrossRef]
156. Krumbholz, N.; Gerlach, K.; Rutz, F.; Koch, M.; Piesiewicz, R.; Kürner, T.; Mittleman, D. Omnidirectional terahertz mirrors: A key
element for future terahertz communication systems. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 202905. [CrossRef]
157. Lu, Y.; Huang, M.; Park, S.; Kim, P.; Nahm, T.-U.; Lee, Y.; Rhee, J. Controllable switching behavior of defect modes in one-
dimensional heterostructure photonic crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 36110. [CrossRef]
158. Awasthi, S.K.; Malaviya, U.; Ojha, S.; Mishra, N.; Singh, B. Design of a tunable polarizer using a one-dimensional nano sized
photonic bandgap structure. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 2008, 5, 133–152. [CrossRef]
159. Liu, C.-C.; Chang, Y.-H.; Wu, C.-J. Refractometric Optical Sensing by using a Multilayer Reflection and Transmission Narrowband
Filter. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2010, 24, 293–305. [CrossRef]
160. Wu, C.-J.; Chu, B.-H.; Weng, M.-T.; Lee, H.-L. Enhancement of Bandwidth in a Chirped Quarter-Wave Dielectric Mirror. J.
Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2009, 23, 437–447. [CrossRef]
161. Wang, X.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Jia, W.; Xu, C.; Liu, X.; Zi, J. Enlargement of omnidirectional total reflection frequency range in
one-dimensional photonic crystals by using photonic heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4291–4293. [CrossRef]
162. Zi, J.; Wan, J.; Zhang, C. Large frequency range of negligible transmission in one-dimensional photonic quantum well structures.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2084–2086. [CrossRef]
163. Srivastava, R.; Pratap, U.; Ojha, S. Enhancement of omnidirectional reflection in photonic crystal heterostructures. Prog.
Electromagn. Res. B 2008, 1, 197–208. [CrossRef]
164. Wu, C.-J.; Rau, Y.-N.; Han, W.-H. Enhancement of Photonic Band Gap in a Disordered Quarter-Wave Dielectric Photonic Crystal.
Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2010, 100, 27–36. [CrossRef]
165. Li, H.; Chen, H.; Qiu, X. Band-gap extension of disordered 1D binary photonic crystals. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2000, 279, 164–167.
[CrossRef]
166. Banerjee, A. Enhanced Incidence Angle Based Spectrum Tuning by Using One-Dimensional Ternary Photonic Band Gap Structures.
J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2010, 24, 1023–1032. [CrossRef]
167. Xiang, Y.J.; Dai, X.; Wen, S.; Tang, Z.; Fan, D. Extending the zero-effective-phase photonic bandgap by one-dimensional ternary
photonic crystals. Appl. Phys. B 2011, 103, 897–906. [CrossRef]
168. Awasthi, S.K.; Malaviya, U.; Ojha, S.P. Enhancement of omnidirectional total-reflection wavelength range by using one-
dimensional ternary photonic bandgap material. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2006, 23, 2566–2571. [CrossRef]
169. Awasthi, S.K.; Ojha, S. Design of a tunable optical filter by using one-dimensional ternary photonic band gap material. Prog.
Electromagn. Res. M 2008, 4, 117–132. [CrossRef]
170. Wu, C.-J.; Chung, Y.-H.; Syu, B.-J.; Yang, T.-J. Band gap extension in a one-dimensional ternary metal-dielectric photonic crystal.
Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2010, 102, 81–93. [CrossRef]
171. Kong, X.-K.; Liu, S.-B.; Feng, Z.; Li, C.; Bian, B. Omnidirectional photonic band gap of one-dimensional ternary plasma photonic
crystals. J. Opt. 2011, 13, 35101. [CrossRef]
172. Bowden, C.; Dowling, J.; Everitt, H. Development and Applications of Materials Exhibiting Photonic Band Gaps Introduction. J.
Opt. Soc. Am. B Opt. Phys. 1993, 10, 280–282. [CrossRef]
173. John, S.; Quang, T. Spontaneous emission near the edge of a photonic band gap. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 50, 1764–1769. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
174. Zhu, S.-Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, H. Quantum Interference Effects in Spontaneous Emission from an Atom Embedded in a Photonic
Band Gap Structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 205–208. [CrossRef]
175. John, S.; Quang, T. Collective Switching and Inversion without Fluctuation of Two-Level Atoms in Confined Photonic Systems.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 1888. [CrossRef]
176. Feng, D.; Yee, S.K.; Zhang, Z.M. Improved performance of a near-field thermophotovoltaic device by a back gapped reflector. Sol.
Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 237, 111562. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 30 of 32
177. Bierman, D.M.; Lenert, A.; Chan, W.R.; Bhatia, B.; Celanović, I.; Soljačić, M.; Wang, E.N. Enhanced photovoltaic energy conversion
using thermally based spectral shaping. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16068. [CrossRef]
178. Bhatt, R.; Kravchenko, I.; Gupta, M. High-efficiency solar thermophotovoltaic system using a nanostructure-based selective
emitter. Sol. Energy 2020, 197, 538–545. [CrossRef]
179. Cornelius, C.M.; Dowling, J.P. Modification of Planck blackbody radiation by photonic band-gap structures. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 59,
4736–4746. [CrossRef]
180. Lin, S.-Y.; Fleming, J.G.; Chow, E.; Bur, J.; Choi, K.K.; Goldberg, A. Enhancement and suppression of thermal emission by a
three-dimensional photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, R2243–R2246. [CrossRef]
181. Pralle, M.U.; Moelders, N.; McNeal, M.P.; Puscasu, I.; Greenwald, A.C.; Daly, J.T.; Johnson, E.A.; George, T.; Choi, D.S.; El-Kady, I.;
et al. Photonic crystal enhanced narrow-band infrared emitters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 4685–4687. [CrossRef]
182. Lin, S.Y.; Moreno, J.; Fleming, J.G. Three-dimensional photonic-crystal emitter for thermal photovoltaic power generation. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 380–382. [CrossRef]
183. Lin, S.-Y.; Fleming, J.G.; El-Kady, I. Three-dimensional photonic-crystal emission through thermal excitation. Opt. Lett. 2003, 28,
1909–1911. [CrossRef]
184. Imada, M.; Noda, S.; Chutinan, A.; Tokuda, T.; Murata, M.; Sasaki, G. Coherent two-dimensional lasing action in surface-emitting
laser with triangular-lattice photonic crystal structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 316–318. [CrossRef]
185. Florescu, M.; John, S. Single-atom switching in photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. A 2001, 64, 33801. [CrossRef]
186. Florescu, M.; John, S. Resonance fluorescence in photonic band gap waveguide architectures: Engineering the vacuum for
all-optical switching. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 69, 53810. [CrossRef]
187. John, S.; Florescu, M. Photonic bandgap materials: Towards an all-optical micro-transistor. J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 2001, 3,
S103–S120. [CrossRef]
188. Khan, A.D.; Rehman, Q.; Khan, A.D.; Subhan, F.E.; Noman, M.; Ahmed, S.; Khan, H.A. Broadband Solar Energy Absorption in
Plasmonic Thin-Film Amorphous Silicon Solar Cell. Coatings 2019, 9, 638. [CrossRef]
189. Bentouaf, A.; Mebsout, R.; Rached, H.; Amari, S. Theoretical investigation of the structural, electronic, magnetic and elastic
properties of binary cubic C15-Laves phases TbX2 (X = Co and Fe). J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 689, 885–893. [CrossRef]
190. Behaghel, B.; Tamaki, R.; Vandamme, N.; Watanabe, K.; Dupuis, C.; Bardou, N.; Sodabanlu, H.; Cattoni, A.; Okada, Y.; Sugiyama, M.; et al.
Absorption enhancement through Fabry-Pérot resonant modes in a 430 nm thick InGaAs/GaAsP multiple quantum wells solar cell. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 81107. [CrossRef]
191. Fan, R.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, G.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Zhou, H. Tailored Au@TiO2 nanostructures for the plasmonic effect in planar
perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 12034–12042. [CrossRef]
192. Siavash, M.R.; Gholipour, S.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Seza, A.; Mehdikhani, A.; Riahi-Noori, N.; Tafazoli, S.; Timasi, N.; Lim, Y.-F.;
Saliba, M. Recent Advances in Plasmonic Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902448. [CrossRef]
193. Willeke, G.; Nussbaumer, H.; Bender, H.; Bucher, E. A simple and effective light trapping technique for polycrystalline silicon
solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1992, 26, 345–356. [CrossRef]
194. Zhao, J.; Wang, A.; Altermatt, P.; Green, M.A. Twenty-four percent efficient silicon solar cells with double layer antireflection
coatings and reduced resistance loss. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 66, 3636–3638. [CrossRef]
195. Chutinan, A.; John, S. Light trapping and absorption optimization in certain thin-film photonic crystal architectures. Phys. Rev. A
2008, 78, 23825. [CrossRef]
196. Duché, D.; Escoubas, L.; Simon, J.-J.; Torchio, P.; Vervisch, W.; Flory, F. Slow Bloch modes for enhancing the absorption of light in
thin films for photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 193310. [CrossRef]
197. Akimov, Y.A.; Koh, W.S.; Ostrikov, K. Enhancement of optical absorption in thin-film solar cells through the excitation of
higher-order nanoparticle plasmon modes. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 10195–10205. [CrossRef]
198. Hallermann, F.; Rockstuhl, C.; Fahr, S.; Seifert, G.; Wackerow, S.; Graener, H.; Plessen, G.V.; Lederer, F. On the use of localized
plasmon polaritons in solar cells. Phys. Status Solidi 2008, 205, 2844–2861. [CrossRef]
199. Rockstuhl, C.; Fahr, S.; Lederer, F. Absorption enhancement in solar cells by localized plasmon polaritons. J. Appl. Phys. 2008,
104, 123102. [CrossRef]
200. Kroll, M.; Fahr, S.; Helgert, C.; Rockstuhl, C.; Lederer, F.; Pertsch, T. Employing dielectric diffractive structures in solar cells—A
numerical study. Phys. Status Solidi 2008, 205, 2777–2795. [CrossRef]
201. Yu, Z.; Raman, A.; Fan, S. Fundamental limit of nanophotonic light-trapping in solar cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107,
17491–17496. [CrossRef]
202. Battaglia, C.; Escarré, J.; Söderström, K.; Erni, L.; Ding, L.; Bugnon, G.; Billet, A.; Boccard, M.; Barraud, L.; De Wolf, S.; et al.
Nanoimprint Lithography for High-Efficiency Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 661–665. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
203. Nechache, R.; Nicklaus, M.; Diffalah, N.; Ruediger, A.; Rosei, F. Pulsed laser deposition growth of rutile TiO2 nanowires on Silicon
substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 313, 48–52. [CrossRef]
204. Zhu, J.; Yu, Z.; Burkhard, G.F.; Hsu, C.-M.; Connor, S.T.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Q.; McGehee, M.; Fan, S.; Cui, Y. Optical Absorption
Enhancement in Amorphous Silicon Nanowire and Nanocone Arrays. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 279–282. [CrossRef]
205. Jacob, Z.; Kim, J.-Y.; Naik, G.V.; Boltasseva, A.; Narimanov, E.E.; Shalaev, V.M. Engineering photonic density of states using
metamaterials. Appl. Phys. B 2010, 100, 215–218. [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 31 of 32
206. Liu, N.; Mesch, M.; Weiss, T.; Hentschel, M.; Giessen, H. Infrared Perfect Absorber and Its Application as Plasmonic Sensor. Nano
Lett. 2010, 10, 2342–2348. [CrossRef]
207. Silalahi, H.; Chen, Y.-P.; CHEN, Y.-S.; Hong, S.; Lin, X.-Y.; Liu, J.-H.; Huang, C.-Y. Floating terahertz metamaterials with extremely
large refractive index sensitivities. Photonics Res. 2021, 9, 1970–1978. [CrossRef]
208. Li, X.; Ying, J.; Liu, J.; Shu, F.; Lang, T.; Jing, X.; Hong, Z. Resonant transparency of a planar anapole metamaterial at terahertz
frequencies. Photonics Res. 2020, 9, 125–130. [CrossRef]
209. Zhang, S.; Zhou, J.; Park, Y.-S.; Rho, J.; Singh, R.; Nam, S.; Azad, A.K.; Chen, H.-T.; Yin, X.; Taylor, A.J.; et al. Photoinduced
handedness switching in terahertz chiral metamolecules. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 942. [CrossRef]
210. Cong, L.; Pitchappa, P.; Wu, Y.; Ke, L.; Lee, C.; Singh, N.; Yang, H.; Singh, R. Active Multifunctional Microelectromechanical
System Metadevices: Applications in Polarization Control, Wavefront Deflection, and Holograms. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017,
5, 1600716. [CrossRef]
211. Yang, Y.; Kim, Y.; Gwak, J.; So, S.; Mun, J.; Kim, M.; Jeong, H.; Kim, I.; Badloe, T.; Rho, J. Realization of Artificial Chirality in
Micro-/Nano-Scale Three-Dimensional Plasmonic Structures BT—Chirality, Magnetism and Magnetoelectricity: Separate Phenomena and
Joint Effects in Metamaterial Structures; Kamenetskii, E., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp.
241–263, ISBN 978-3-030-62844-4.
212. Mun, J.; Rho, J. Importance of higher-order multipole transitions on chiral nearfield interactions. Nanophotonics 2019, 8, 941–948.
[CrossRef]
213. Barron, L.D. Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; ISBN
9780521121378.
214. Yoo, S.; Park, Q.-H. Metamaterials and chiral sensing: A review of fundamentals and applications. Nanophotonics 2019, 8, 249–261.
[CrossRef]
215. Tester, R.F.; Karkalas, J. Carbohydrates—Classification and Properties. In The Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2nd ed.;
Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 862–875, ISBN 978-0-12-227055-0.
216. Ashalley, E.; Acheampong, K.; Vazquez Besteiro, L.; Yu, P.; Neogi, A.; Govorov, A.; Wang, Z. Multitask deep-learning-based
design of chiral plasmonic metamaterials. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 1213–1225. [CrossRef]
217. Assouar, B.; Liang, B.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheng, J.-C.; Jing, Y. Acoustic metasurfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 460–472. [CrossRef]
218. Li, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liang, B.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, L. Metascreen-Based Acoustic Passive Phased Array. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2015, 4, 24003.
[CrossRef]
219. Huang, T.-Y.; Shen, C.; Jing, Y. Membrane- and plate-type acoustic metamaterials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2016, 139, 3240–3250.
[CrossRef]
220. Xie, Y.; Popa, B.-I.; Zigoneanu, L.; Cummer, S.A. Measurement of a Broadband Negative Index with Space-Coiling Acoustic
Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 175501. [CrossRef]
221. Asadchy, V.S.; Díaz-Rubio, A.; Tretyakov, S.A. Bianisotropic metasurfaces: Physics and applications. Nanophotonics 2018, 7,
1069–1094. [CrossRef]
222. Tretyakov, S.A. Nonreciprocal composite with the material relations of the transparent absorbing boundary. Microw. Opt. Technol.
Lett. 1998, 19, 365–368. [CrossRef]
223. Mahmoud, A.M.; Davoyan, A.R.; Engheta, N. All-passive nonreciprocal metastructure. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8359. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
224. Kodera, T.; Sounas, D.L.; Caloz, C. Artificial Faraday rotation using a ring metamaterial structure without static magnetic field.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 31114. [CrossRef]
225. Li, Q.; Bao, W.; Nie, Z.; Xia, Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, X. A non-unitary metasurface enables continuous control of
quantum photon-photon interactions from bosonic to fermionic. Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 267–271. [CrossRef]
226. Gansel, J.K.; Thiel, M.; Rill, M.S.; Decker, M.; Bade, K.; Saile, V.; Freymann, G.v.; Linden, S.; Wegener, M. Gold helix photonic
metamateri-al as broadband circular polarizer. Science 2009, 325, 1513–1515. [CrossRef]
227. Li, C.; Yu, P.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.; Tong, X.; Wen, Q.; Kuo, H.-C.; Wang, Z.M. Dielectric metasurfaces: From
wavefront shaping to quantum platforms. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2020, 95, 100584. [CrossRef]
228. Lu, C.; Hu, X.; Shi, K.; Hu, Q.; Zhu, R.; Yang, H.; Gong, Q. An actively ultrafast tunable giant slow-light effect in ultrathin
nonlinear metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e302. [CrossRef]
229. Meng, X.; Depauw, V.; Gomard, G.; El Daif, O.; Trompoukis, C.; Drouard, E.; Jamois, C.; Fave, A.; Dross, F.; Gordon, I.; et al.
Design, fabrication and optical characterization of photonic crystal assisted thin film monocrystalline-silicon solar cells. Opt.
Express 2012, 20, A465–A475. [CrossRef]
230. Aïssa, B.; Ali, A.; El Mellouhi, F. Oxide and Organic-Inorganic Halide Perovskites with Plasmonics for Optoelectronic and Energy
Applications: A Contributive Review. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1057. [CrossRef]
231. Kowerdziej, R.; Wróbel, J.; Kula, P. Ultrafast electrical switching of nanostructured metadevice with dual-frequency liquid crystal.
Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20367. [CrossRef]
232. Solntsev, A.S.; Agarwal, G.S.; Kivshar, Y.S. Metasurfaces for quantum photonics. Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 327–336. [CrossRef]
233. Shrekenhamer, D.; Chen, W.-C.; Padilla, W.J. Liquid Crystal Tunable Metamaterial Absorber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 177403.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1027 32 of 32
234. Wu, J.; Yao, S.; Zhang, H.; Man, W.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Fang, D.; Zhang, Y. Liquid Crystal Elastomer Metamaterials with
Giant Biaxial Thermal Shrinkage for Enhancing Skin Regeneration. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2106175. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
235. Miri, M.-A.; Alù, A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science 2019, 363, eaar7709. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
236. Feng, L.; El-Ganainy, R.; Ge, L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity-time symmetry. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 752–762.
[CrossRef]
237. Ozdemir, S.; Rotter, S.; Nori, F.; Yang, L. Parity-time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 783–798.
[CrossRef]
238. Park, J.-H.; Ndao, A.; Cai, W.; Hsu, L.; Kodigala, A.; Lepetit, T.; Lo, Y.-H.; Kanté, B. Symmetry-breaking-induced plasmonic
exceptional points and nanoscale sensing. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 462–468. [CrossRef]
239. Wang, C.; Sweeney, W.; Stone, A.D.; Yang, L. Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point. Science 2021, 373, 1261–1265.
[CrossRef]
240. El-Ganainy, R.; Khajavikhan, M.; Christodoulides, D.; Ozdemir, S. The dawn of non-Hermitian optics. Commun. Phys. 2019, 2, 37.
[CrossRef]
241. Lazarides, N.; Tsironis, G.P. Gain-Driven Discrete Breathers in PT-Symmetric Nonlinear Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013,
110, 53901. [CrossRef]
242. Yang, F.; Hwang, A.; Doiron, C.; Naik, G.V. Non-Hermitian metasurfaces for the best of plasmonics and dielectrics. Opt. Mater.
Express 2021, 11, 2326–2334. [CrossRef]
243. Baranov, D.; Krasnok, A.; Shegai, T.; Alu, A.; Chong, Y. Coherent perfect absorbers: Linear control of light with light. Nat. Rev.
Mater. 2017, 2, 17064. [CrossRef]
244. Chong, Y.; Ge, L.; Cao, H.; Stone, A.D. Coherent Perfect Absorbers: Time-Reversed Lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 53901.
[CrossRef]
245. Li, C.; Qiu, J.; Ou, J.-Y.; Liu, Q.H.; Zhu, J. High-Sensitivity Refractive Index Sensors Using Coherent Perfect Absorption on
Graphene in the Vis-NIR Region. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 3231–3237. [CrossRef]
246. Ioannou, K.; Koukos, I. Metamaterials and Stealth Technology. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on “Experi-
ments/Process/System Modeling/Simulation/Optimization” (7th IC-EPSMSO), Athens, Greece, 5–8 July 2017.
247. Pu, M.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Luo, X. Merging plasmonics and metamaterials by two-dimensional subwavelength structures. J.
Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4361–4378. [CrossRef]
248. Wenjie, W.; Yidong, C.; Li, G.; Heeso, N.; Douglas, S.A.; Hui, C. Time-Reversed Lasing and Interferometric Control of Absorption.
Science 2011, 331, 889–892. [CrossRef]