Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11 +Artikel+WSEE+ (Ibu+Neneng+dan+Wiwiek) +420-432
11 +Artikel+WSEE+ (Ibu+Neneng+dan+Wiwiek) +420-432
Corresponding Author:
has become an essential tool in guiding social companies. Scholars have explored the role of
entrepreneurs to achieve sustainability and incubators, accelerators, impact investors, and
impact goals. On the leadership side, the policy frameworks in supporting and
Transformational Leadership model has been nurturing social enterprises. Understanding
widely discussed in the context of social the elements that contribute to a conducive
entrepreneurship, as it focuses on inspiring ecosystem is critical to fostering a sustainable
and empowering individuals to contribute to and impactful social entrepreneurship
the betterment of society. landscape [5], [31]–[34].
The literature on social
entrepreneurship is not limited to a specific 3. RESEARCH METHODS
geographical area but includes global
Bibliometric reviews, which focus on
perspectives and examples. Social
quantitatively examining journal papers,
entrepreneurs and ventures from different
books, or other types of written
countries and cultural contexts have been
communication, are widely used in scientific
studied to understand how social innovation
disciplines [35]. This investigation began with
and its impact materialize in diverse settings.
a Google database search for journals that
Cross-country comparisons of social
address the issue of entrepreneurial
entrepreneurship ecosystems have
leadership.
highlighted the role of institutional factors,
This section describes the profiles and
regulatory environments and cultural norms
statistics of entrepreneurial leadership
in shaping social entrepreneurship practices
journals in detail. Table 3 summarizes some
[11], [30].
key points about the measurements in the
The evolving social entrepreneurship
articles. On July 21, 2023, these metric data
ecosystem involves stakeholders, including
were extracted from the metadata using the
governments, non-governmental
Publish or Perish (PoP) program.
organizations, academics, investors, and
Table 2. Metric Information from Selected Journals
Metrics Data Information
Publication years 1968-2023
Citation years 100
Papers 1000
Citations 77925
Cites/year 1416.82
Cites/paper 79.52
Authors/paper 2.18
h-index 83
g-index 190
hI, norm 71
hI, annual 0.65
hA, index 23
and other scholarly publications, making it an on text data using the title and abstract
ideal source for studying social columns, with the binary counting method,
entrepreneurship and leadership literature. 3421 terms were found. With a minimum
VOSviewer is a widely used number of occurrences of a term of 10 times,
bibliometric software that enables the 81 thresholds were found.
visualization and analysis of bibliographic However, for each of these 81 terms, a
data. The software allows us to generate co- relevance score will be calculated. Based on
authorship networks, co-citation networks, this score, the most relevant term will be
and keyword co-occurrence maps to reveal automatically selected by default at 60%,
patterns and relationships in the literature. resulting in 49 most appropriate words.
However, the verification process must be
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION done manually by removing unrelated words,
such as editorial, sample, abstract, etc. Thus,
To answer the first objective of this
the total number of words that can be
study regarding how social entrepreneurship
included in the map generation is 32
and leadership articles are classified, using
comments.
VosViewer software, by creating maps based
This table presents the results of a represents a set of related themes and topics
cluster analysis conducted on the social in the literature. The clusters identified in
entrepreneurship and leadership literature Table 2 provide valuable insights into
using VOSviewer. The analysis identified six thematic areas and emerging social
different clusters based on the co-occurrence entrepreneurship and leadership literature
of keywords in the publications. Each cluster trends. Researchers and practitioners can use
this information to identify specific research Overall, the findings from the cluster
themes, potential collaborations, and areas for analysis contribute to a deeper understanding
further exploration. Policymakers and of the multifaceted nature of social
organizational leaders can gain insights into entrepreneurship and leadership,
the importance of social justice, corporate highlighting the diverse research interests
social responsibility, social capital, social and areas of focus within this dynamic field.
enterprise, and social leadership in fostering The information presented in Table 2 is
positive social change and promoting valuable for advancing knowledge, guiding
inclusive and just societies. In addition, policy decisions, and encouraging impactful
analysis of power dynamics and social class research and practice in social
implications can inform efforts to promote entrepreneurship and leadership.
responsible and ethical leadership practices.
Table 3 presents the ten most cited Overall, the highly-cited publications in Table
social entrepreneurship and leadership 3 reflect the diversity of research themes and
literature publications. These publications methodologies within social
have attracted significant attention and entrepreneurship and leadership. These
influence, as evidenced by their number of influential works have contributed
citations. Let us discuss the essential findings significantly to advancing knowledge,
and implications of these highly-cited works. guiding practice, and shaping discussions on
leadership, social impact, and social justice. inform their work and contribute to the field’s
Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers ongoing development.
can use these foundational publications to
Table 4. Frequently occurring terms
Most Fower
Term Term
Occurences Occurences
112 Social Justice 19 Divesity
40 Educational leadership 19 Corporate Social Responsibility
28 Equity 19 Communication
27 Power 19 Challenge
27 Social capital 18 Authentic leadership
27 School leader 17 School leadership
26 Social justice leadership 16 Activity
24 Transformational leadership 15 Social cohesin
24 Leadership style 15 Social work leadership
22 Social worker 14 Discourse
22 Social influence 12 Inclusion
21 Social leadership 12 Social medium
20 Social identity 12 Social construction
20 Social 10 Social entreprise Leadership
19 Management 10 Social psychology
Table 4 presents the results of the capital in influencing outcomes, and the
analysis of term occurrence in the social attributes and responsibilities of school
entrepreneurship and leadership literature. leaders.
The table provides insights into the most "Social justice leadership" and
frequently occurring terms and their "Leadership style" appeared 26 and 24 times,
occurrence and terms with fewer occurrences. respectively. These terms emphasize the
Let us discuss the key findings and study of leadership practices aligned with
implications of this analysis: social justice principles and exploring
Most Occurrences: different leadership styles in social contexts.
"Social justice" is the term with the Fewer Occurrences:
most occurrences (112), indicating that social Terms with fewer occurrences
justice is a dominant and central theme in the include "Diversity," "Corporate Social
literature. Researchers and scholars have Responsibility," "Communication," and
explored how leadership and social "Challenges," which appeared 19 times each.
entrepreneurship can promote justice, Although these terms have lower frequencies,
equality, and societal well-being. they still indicate relevant and emerging
"Educational leadership" and topics in the literature.
"Equity" are other prominent terms, with 40 "Authentic leadership," "School
and 28 occurrences, respectively. This leadership," "Activities," "Social cohesion,"
suggests that the intersection of leadership and "Social work leadership" were the other
and education and the pursuit of equality terms with fewer occurrences, appearing
across domains is a significant area of research between 16 and 18 times each. These terms
in this field. most likely represent specific leadership and
"Power," "Social capital," and "School social entrepreneurship aspects that have
leaders" were also frequent terms (27). received less attention in the literature.
Existing literature is likely to study power "Discourse", "Inclusion", "Social
dynamics in leadership, the role of social media", and "Social construction" appeared 14
to 12 times, respectively. These terms most effectively while ensuring their long-term
likely relate to the role of communication, viability and success as businesses.
inclusion, and social media in influencing
Here are some key aspects to discuss about
leadership practices and social
social enterprise leadership:
entrepreneurship initiatives.
Mission-Driven Leadership: Social
Terms with 10 occurrences include
enterprise leaders are driven by a solid
"Social enterprise" and "Social psychology,"
commitment to the organization's social or
suggesting that exploring social class
environmental mission. They are passionate
dynamics and psychological aspects of social
about making a positive difference in society
entrepreneurship and leadership are areas of
and are dedicated to addressing specific social
relatively lower representation in the
issues or challenges.
literature.
Balancing Social and Financial Goals:
The analysis of term occurrences in
One of the central challenges for social
Table 4 provides valuable insights into the
enterprise leaders is balancing the pursuit of
dominant themes and topics in the social
social impact with the need to generate
entrepreneurship and leadership literature.
revenue and ensure financial stability. They
The prominence of terms such as "Social
must navigate the business’s complexities
justice", "Educational leadership", "Equality",
while staying true to its mission.
and "Power" demonstrates the field's focus on
Innovative Problem-Solving: Social
addressing social challenges, particularly in
enterprise leaders must be innovative and
educational contexts. In addition, identifying
resourceful in solving social problems. They
terms with fewer occurrences highlights
may need to think outside the box, explore
potential research gaps and opportunities for
new business models, and adopt creative
further exploration.
approaches to maximize their impact.
Researchers and practitioners can use
Measuring Social Impact: Effective
these insights to guide their work, identify
social enterprise leaders prioritize measuring
areas for collaboration, and address under-
and evaluating the social impact of their
explored aspects of social entrepreneurship
organization's activities. They use various
and leadership. Policymakers can also use this
metrics and evaluation tools to understand
analysis to inform policy initiatives
the outcomes of their initiatives and make
promoting social justice, equity, and
data-driven decisions.
responsible leadership practices. Overall, the
Collaboration and Partnerships:
incidence analysis is a valuable resource to
Social enterprise leaders recognize the
advance knowledge and promote impactful
importance of cooperation and partnerships
research and practice in social
with other stakeholders, including nonprofits,
entrepreneurship and leadership.
governments, corporations, and communities.
Social enterprise leadership is a term
Such partnerships can enhance the
that has emerged, so it is a suggestion for
organization's reach and effectiveness.
future research. "Social Enterprise leadership"
Sustainable Business Practices: Social
is a term that has grown in popularity in
enterprise leaders often focus on adopting
recent years as a business model that aims to
sustainable business practices to maintain
address social and environmental issues
financial sustainability. These may include
while generating revenue.
efficient resource management, responsible
Social enterprise leadership refers to
supply chain practices, and environmentally
leading and managing a social enterprise—a
friendly operations.
business or organization that seeks to create
Ethical Leadership: Ethical leadership
positive social or environmental impact while
is a crucial aspect of social enterprise
also pursuing financial sustainability. Social
leadership. Leaders must demonstrate
enterprise leaders are crucial in guiding these
integrity, transparency, and accountability in
organizations to achieve their social missions
their actions and decision-making.
REFERENCES
[1] O. Kravets, C. Preece, and ..., “The uniform entrepreneur: Making gender visible in social enterprise,” J.
Macromarketing, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0276146720930331.
[2] H. S. Jun and M. S. Chae, “The Impact of Social Entrepreneur’s Competence and Social Value Pursuit on the
Performance of Social Enterprise: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Entrepreneurship Education PDF icon,”
Asia-pacific J. Multimed. Serv. Converg. with Art, Humanit. Sociol., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 165–177, 2017.
[3] E. D. Konrad, “Cultural entrepreneurship: The impact of social networking on success,” Creat. Innov. Manag., vol. 22,
no. 3, pp. 307–319, 2013.
[4] A. O. Herlianti, H. Mulyadi, and N. A. Hamdani, “How Is Business Success through Digital Innovation and
Entrepreneurial Orientation on SMEs?,” Asia Proc. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 243–244, 2022.
[5] A. Margiono and F. Feranita, “The past, present, and future of social entrepreneurship in Indonesia: A strategy to
move the ecosystem forward,” Entrep. Connect. Network, Innov. Strateg. Perspect., pp. 29–40, 2021.
[6] P. Ambrose Ng’ang’a and S. Nyang’au, “ENTREPRENEURSHIP INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY ON GROWTH
OF MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES IN KAJIADO NORTH SUB-COUNTY,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Manag. Entrep., vol.
6, no. 1, 2022.
[7] J. Florin and E. Schmidt, “Creating shared value in the hybrid venture arena: A business model innovation
perspective,” J. Soc. Entrep., 2011, doi: 10.1080/19420676.2011.614631.
[8] P. C. Light, “Reshaping social entrepreneurship,” Stanford Social Innovation Review. mit.edu, 2006. [Online]. Available:
http://web.mit.edu/sloan2/dese/readings/week01/Light_ReshapingSE.pdf
[9] T. A. Arshi and S. Viswanath, “Entrepreneurial leadership and innovation: An empirical study on organizational
leadership characteristics and entrepreneurial innovation intensity,” Am. J. Soc. Issues Humanit., vol. 3, no. 5, pp.
2276–6928, 2013.
[10] D. R. Denney, A Global Examination of Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Synthesis of Entrepreneurial Planned Behavior and Social
Cognitive Theory. search.proquest.com, 2020. [Online]. Available:
https://search.proquest.com/openview/42859df4b18b38be208a8bd7de9958b4/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
[11] Y. Iskandar, J. Joeliaty, U. Kaltum, and H. Hilmiana, “Systematic review of the barriers to social enterprise
performance using an institutional framework,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2124592, 2022.
[12] A. Pallares, “Ecuadorian immigrants and symbolic nationalism in Chicago,” Lat. Stud., 2005, doi:
10.1057/palgrave.lst.8600158.
[13] J. Defourny, C. Borzaga, and J. Defourny, “From third sector to social enterprise,” … Soc. Enterp. …, 2001, [Online].
Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=-
pfAAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA17&dq=social+enterprise&ots=XZf0LvgDCu&sig=gd_ro_1bQWpNqtvZfBlpO13B
zpw
[14] S. Doh, “Social entrepreneurship and regional economic development: The case of social enterprise in South Korea,”
Sustainability, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8843
[15] T. Warnecke and A. N. Houndonougbo, “Let there be light: Social enterprise, solar power, and sustainable
development,” J. Econ. Issues, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00213624.2016.1176479.
[16] R. G. Klapper and V. A. Farber, “In Alain Gibb’s footsteps: Evaluating alternative approaches to sustainable
enterprise education (SEE),” Int. J. Manag. …, 2016, [Online]. Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811716300556
[17] L. Kelly, V. Perkins, A. Zuraik, and W. Luse, “Social impact: The role of authentic leadership, compassion and grit
in social entrepreneurship,” J. Entrep., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 298–329, 2022.
[18] E. O. AKSÖZ and İ. I. CAN, “Bibliometric Analysis of Published Theses on Social Entrepreneurship in Tourism:
Comparison of Turkey, the UK, and the USA,” Int. J. Contemp. Tour. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–178, 2022.
[19] C. W. Letts, L. D. Brown, and S. H. Alvord, “Social entrepreneurship: leadership that facilitates societal
transformation-an exploratory study,” 2003.
[20] A. Dettori and M. Floris, “Technology in social entrepreneurship studies: a bibliometric analysis (1990-2019),” Int. J.
Bus. Manag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 41–57, 2021.
[21] E. Sipahi Dongul and E. Artantaş, “Exploring the link between social work, entrepreneurial leadership, social
embeddedness, social entrepreneurship and firm performance: a case of SMES owned by Chinese ethnic community
in Turkey,” J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 684–707, 2023.
[22] S. Munch, “Improving the benefit corporation: How traditional governance mechanisms can enhance the innovative
new business form,” Nw. JL &Soc. Pol’y, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-
bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/nwjlsopo7§ion=9
[23] D. B. Reiser, “Benefit corporations-a sustainable form of organization,” Wake For. L. Rev., 2011, [Online]. Available:
https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/wflr46§ion=29
[24] D. B. Reiser, “Blended enterprise and the dual mission dilemma,” Vt. L. Rev., 2010, [Online]. Available:
https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/vlr35§ion=10
[25] A. Ong, “Latitudes of citizenship: Membership, meaning, and multiculturalism,” People out place Glob. Hum. rights,
…, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vpBOS-
HEkLwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA53&dq=entrepeneurial+leadership&ots=pM40jzv_hS&sig=ANAIEijKorHeYjA35-
BIi5VHX5M
[26] P. M. Paulson, The growth centre strategy in the context of a planning process framework for Africa: the Zambian case.
open.library.ubc.ca, 1975. [Online]. Available: https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/831/items/1.0058355
[27] L. Dubé et al., “Impact of the eKutir ICT-enabled social enterprise and its distributed micro-entrepreneur strategy on
fruit and vegetable consumption: a quasi-experimental study in …,” Food Policy, 2020, [Online]. Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919219306098
[28] T. Saebi, N. J. Foss, and S. Linder, “Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises,” J.
Manage., 2019, doi: 10.1177/0149206318793196.
[29] F. Perrini, C. Vurro, and L. A. Costanzo, “A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: From opportunity
identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano,” Entrep. Reg. …, 2010, doi:
10.1080/08985626.2010.488402.
[30] M. L. Kourilsky, W. B. Walstad, and A. Thomas, The entrepreneur in youth: An untapped resource for economic growth,
social entrepreneurship, and education. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
[31] S. Kraus, C. Palmer, N. Kailer, F. L. Kallinger, and J. Spitzer, “Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new
business models for the twenty-first century,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 353–375, 2019, doi:
10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425.
[32] D. M. Mansour, S. R. Sedita, and R. Apa, “Dynamics of Entrepreneurship in Egypt: Assessing the Entrepreneurial
Ecosystem: Can Entrepreneurship Contribute to the Economic Development in Egypt?,” … Ecosyst. Middle East North
…, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75913-5_19.
[33] A. H. Pratono and A. Sutanti, “The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review
in Indonesia,” Pacific Sci. Rev. B Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 106–112, 2016.
[34] J. S. McMullen, “Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between
social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem,” J. Bus. Ventur., 2018, [Online]. Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088390261830394X
[35] R. Heersmink, J. van den Hoven, N. J. van Eck, and J. van den Berg, “Bibliometric mapping of computer and
information ethics,” Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 13, pp. 241–249, 2011.
[36] M. Uhl-Bien, “Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing,” Leadersh.
Q., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 654–676, 2006.
[37] R. Dart, “The legitimacy of social enterprise,” Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh., 2004, doi: 10.1002/nml.43.
[38] J. R. Meindl, “The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach,” Leadersh.
Q., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 1995.
[39] P. Balkundi and M. Kilduff, “The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 17, no.
4, pp. 419–439, 2006.
[40] B. Shamir, “Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 6, no. 1, pp.
19–47, 1995.
[41] K. B. Lowe and W. L. Gardner, “Ten years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future,”
Leadersh. Q., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 459–514, 2000.
[42] K. W. Parry, “Grounded theory and social process: A new direction for leadership research,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 9, no.
1, pp. 85–105, 1998.
[43] I. E. Bogotch, “Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory,” J. Sch. Leadersh., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 138–
156, 2002.
[44] G. Jean-Marie, A. H. Normore, and J. S. Brooks, “Leadership for social justice: Preparing 21st century school leaders
for a new social order,” J. Res. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2009.
[45] B. Hoppe and C. Reinelt, “Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 21,
no. 4, pp. 600–619, 2010.
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS