Professional Documents
Culture Documents
消費者行為 簡報
消費者行為 簡報
消費者行為 簡報
1 2 3
Examining the roles of Identifying key Understanding how
central and peripheral determinants the effectiveness of
routes in information influencing consumers marketing messages
processing during the to choose either the varies based on
consumer decision- central or peripheral consumers'
making process for cell route when evaluating engagement with
phone purchases. cell phone options. the central or
peripheral route.
Literature Review
1. Research on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) by Petty and
Cacioppo (1986) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding
the central and peripheral routes to persuasion and information
processing.
3. Mangold and Faulds (2009) and Brown et al. (2007) emphasize the
influence of online communities and social networks on consumer
decision-making.
Literature Review
High ability to process Participants with high prior knowledge will exhibit better recall
and application of technical information after exposure to
prior knowledge cellphone-related stimuli.
Low ability to process Participants with low prior knowledge will perceive technical
details as more complex and may struggle with information
prior knowledge retention.
Research Methodology
Subject and design
Contains some questionnaires testing the Contains some questionnaires testing the
participants’ knowledge including the participants’ preference including the
following following
A list of different cell phones Two different advertisements about two
A rating scale from one to ten fictional cell phones, each advertisement
Some questions asking about generated from a real cell phone ad
participants' knowledge and perceptions 2 rating scales from one to ten testing
of the cell phones they rated participants' preferences
Some detailed questions about the questions asking opinions about the cell
functions and specialties of each cell phones such as price and function
phone
Purpose: To test the influence of arguement
Purpose: To test the ability of each quality to each participants
participants
Research Methodology
Independent variables— Ability
Participant abilities are tested in the first booklet
For high ability participants, we predict For low ability participants, we assume
that they will be ranking the cell phones that they rate the cell phones according to
based on the functions of the phones, and their own preferences, and the correct
that the detailed functional questions rate of the functional questions should be
should be answered correctly. lower than 50%
Research Methodology
Independent variables— Arguement quality
V.S
Strong argument Weak argument
Research Methodology
Strong argument
“scientifically designed”
The cell phone is innovatively engineered, which
is Cutting-edge technology
In the direct comparison test, the cell phone’s
battery life can last twice as many other cell
phones as its nearest competitor
Research Methodology
Weak argument
“designed for beauty”
Comes in various colors.
The cell phone has a proper price for you.
Research Methodology
Dependent variables
Strong arguments can help the formation of positive attitudes towards products to consumers with
higher ability and knowledge towards the products, which can be concluded as the central route; and
weak arguments can rise attitudes towards products positively to consumers with lower ability and
knowledge towards the products.
Academic Contributions & Managerial Implications
1 2
Petty(1983) use Enterprise need to
razor to discribe give proper
hiw and low argument to the
involvement. experts or the
normal customer.
Research limitations and future directions
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2018). Principles of Marketing (17th ed.). The University of Minnesota Libraries
Publishing.
Mangold, W.G. and Faulds, D.J. (2009) Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix. Journal
of Business Horizons, 52, 357-365.
Ondersma, S. J., Martino, S., Svikis, D. S., & Yonkers, K. A. (2017). Commentary on Kim et al. (2017): Staying
focused on non‐treatment seekers. Addiction, 112(5), 828–829.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: central and peripheral routes
to attitude change. Springer.
Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-Mouth Communications A Motivational Analysis.
In J. W. Alba, & J. W. Hutchinson (Eds.), NA—Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 25, pp. 527-531). Provo,
UT Association for Consumer Research. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.).
Verhoef, P. C., Reinartz, W. J., & Krafft, M. (2010). Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in
Customer Management. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 247-252.
Thank you for listening!