CVE151 Chap2 Analysis of Statically Determinate Structures

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 70

MDP

CVE151
STRUCTURAL THEORY I

CVE151 Chap 2
1
MDP
Analysis of Statically
Determinate
Structures
CHAPTER 2

CVE151 Chap 2
2
MDP
Objectives

At the end of this chapter, the student will be able to:

1. Idealize real structures to obtain analytical models


2. Analyze determinate structures by applying various structural
analysis theorems and principles
3. Identify the state of determinacy and stability of determinate
structures (beam, frame, cable and arch) under static loads and
moving loads

CVE151 Chap 2
3
MDP
Content

1. Idealized Structure
2. Principle of Superposition
3. Equations of Equilibrium
4. Determinacy and Stability of Structures

CVE151 Chap 2
4
MDP
2.1 Idealized Structure

CVE151 Chap 2
Idealized Models

5
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
6
MDP
Hinge Support

CVE151 Chap 2
Roller Support

7
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
8
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
9
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
10
MDP
pin- and/ or roller-
supported
connections.

CVE151 Chap 2
Jib Crane and Trolley
11
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
12
MDP
Tributary Loadings

When flat surfaces such as walls, floors, or


roofs are supported by a structural frame, it
is necessary to determine how the load on
these surfaces is transmitted to the various
structural elements used for their support.

CVE151 Chap 2
13
MDP
One-Way System

A slab or deck that is supported such that it delivers its load to the
supporting members by one-way action, is often referred to as a one-way
slab.

CVE151 Chap 2
14
MDP
To illustrate the method of load transmission, consider the framing
system shown in Fig. 2–11a where the beams AB, CD, and EF rest on
the girders AE and BF.

tributary area

CVE151 Chap 2
Member CD

𝑤𝐶𝐷 =(100 lb/ft)(5 𝑓𝑡 2 ) = 500 lb/ft

15
MDP
Girders AE and BF

CVE151 Chap 2
𝑃𝐴𝐸 =(500 lb/ft)(10 ft) / 2= 2500 lb

16
MDP
One-Way Slab

➢ For some floor systems the beams and


girders are connected to the columns at
the same elevation, as in Fig. 2–12a.
➢ The slab is reinforced concrete with
reinforcement in only one direction
➢ The concrete is poured on a corrugated
metal deck, then one-way action of load

CVE151 Chap 2
transmission can be assumed.
Fig. 2–12a

17
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
18
MDP
If 𝑳𝟐 > 𝑳𝟏 and if the span ratio (𝑳𝟐 /𝑳𝟏 ) > 2, the slab will behave as a one-
way slab, since as 𝑳𝟏 becomes smaller, the beams AB, CD, and EF provide the
greater stiffness to carry the load (American Concrete Institute, ACI 318)

CVE151 Chap 2
19
MDP
Two-Way Slab
If 𝑳𝟐 > 𝑳𝟏 and if the span ratio (𝑳𝟐 /𝑳𝟏 ) ≤2, the slab will behave as a two-way
slab, the load is assumed to be delivered to the supporting beams and girders in
two directions.(American Concrete Institute, ACI 318)

CVE151 Chap 2
See Sample Problems in the Hibbeler Textbook.

20
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
21
MDP
2.2 Principle of Superposition
The principle of superposition forms the basis for much of the theory of structural

analysis. It may be stated as follows: The total displacement or internal loadings

(stress) at a point in a structure subjected to several external loadings can be

determined by adding together the displacements or internal loadings (stress)

caused by each of the external loads acting separately.

CVE151 Chap 2
22
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
23
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
24
2.3 Equations of equilibrium

MDP
CVE151 Chap 2
25
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
26
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
27
MDP
2.4 Determinacy and Stability of Structures

Determinacy
When all the forces in a structure can be determined strictly from equilibrium equations,
the structure is referred to as statically determinate. Structures having more unknown
forces than available equilibrium equations are called statically indeterminate.

For a coplanar structure there are at most three equilibrium equations for each part, so
that if there is a total of n parts and r force and moment reaction components, we have

CVE151 Chap 2
28
MDP
2.4 Determinacy and Stability of Structures

CVE151 Chap 2
29
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
30
MDP
𝐢𝐞 = 𝐫 − 𝟑𝐧 (𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑛 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠)

CVE151 Chap 2
31
MDP
Example 2.1

Classify each of the beams shown in Fig. 2–19a through 2–19d as statically
determinate or statically indeterminate. If statically indeterminate, report the
number of degrees of indeterminacy. The beams are subjected to external
loading.

CVE151 Chap 2
32
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
33
MDP
Example 2.2
Classify each of the pin-connected structures shown in Fig. 2–20a through 2–20d as
statically determinate or statically indeterminate. If statically indeterminate, report the
number of degrees of indeterminacy. The structures are subjected to arbitrary external
loadings that are assumed to be known and can act anywhere on the structures.

CVE151 Chap 2
34
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
35
MDP
Example 2.3
(Frame) Classify each of the frames shown in Fig. 2–21a and 2–21b as statically
determinate or statically indeterminate. If statically indeterminate, report the number of
degrees of indeterminacy. The frames are subjected to external loadings that are
assumed to be known and can act anywhere on the frames.

CVE151 Chap 2
36
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
37
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
38
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
39
MDP
In general, a structure will be geometrically unstable—that is, it
will move slightly or collapse—if there are fewer reactive forces
than equations of equilibrium; or if there are enough reactions,
instability will occur if the lines of action of the reactive forces
intersect at a common point or are parallel to one another.

CVE151 Chap 2
40
MDP
Partial Constraints

The equation σ 𝐹𝑥 = 0 will not be


satisfied for the loading conditions
and therefore the member will be
unstable.

CVE151 Chap 2
41
MDP
Improper Constraints

All the support


reactions are concurrent
at a point.

Reactive forces are all parallel.

CVE151 Chap 2
42
MDP
(b)
(a)

CVE151 Chap 2
r < 3 Externally Statically Unstable r = 3, But improper arrangement of
supports lead to external geometric
instability in plane structures

43
MDP
Conclusion:

In order for a plane internally stable structure to be


geometrically stable (externally), it must be supported
by at least three reactions that cannot be all parallel nor
concurrent.

CVE151 Chap 2
44
MDP
Example 2.4
Classify each of the structures in the figures below as externally unstable,
statically determinate, or statically indeterminate. Determine degree of external
indeterminacy.

CVE151 Chap 2
45
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
46
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
47
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
48
MDP
Applications of the Equations of Equilibrium

CVE151 Chap 2
49
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
50
Example 2.6

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


51
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
52
Example 2.5

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


53
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
54
Example 2.6

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


55
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
56
Example 2.7

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


57
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
58
Example 2.8

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


59
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
60
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
61
Example 2.9

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


62
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
63
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
64
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
65
MDP
Analysis of Shear Diaphragm and Shear Wall Systems

Treating the diaphragm as a beam


allows you to calculate the shear
wall forces and apply the
principles of a beam to the
diaphragm, with and without roof
openings or irregular roof or
building geometry.

The load distribution in a basic


rectangle-shaped building is as
follows.

➢ The roof diaphragm is oriented


horizontally and carries loads to

CVE151 Chap 2
the endwall (shear wall) and
then to the foundation.
➢ The side walls carry the load to
the roof diaphragm on top and
the foundation at the bottom.
66
.

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


67
Example 2.10

CVE151 Chap 2 MDP


68
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
69
CVE151 Chap 2 MDP
70

You might also like