Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Distribution Channels in International Marketing
Distribution Channels in International Marketing
Distribution Channels in International Marketing
Marketing
By P Mittal|Distribution Channels
Contents:
According to Philip Kotler, “Every producer seeks to link together the set of
marketing intermediaries that best fulfil the firm’s objectives. This set of
marketing intermediaries is called the marketing channel.”
“Distribution channel is that path which includes all individuals and institutions
which work to make goods reach the consumers from producers without
interruption.” Thus distribution channel helps in the transfer of goods in original
form from producers to consumers.
In this method of distribution channel, product reaches the agent from the
manufacturers and from the agent to wholesaler and then to consumers
through retailers. In India, most of the textile manufacturers adopt this method
of distribution.
As per this method of distribution channel, there is only one middleman that is
the agent. In India, for the distribution of medicines and cosmetics, this channel
of distribution is commonly adopted.
A manufacturer may choose to distribute his goods with the help of two
middlemen. These two middlemen may be wholesalers and retailers.
6. Manufacturers → Consumers:
The channels for industrial products are generally short as retailers are not
needed.
Under this method, product reaches from manufacturer to agent and then to
industrial consumer through the wholesaler.
2. Manufacturer → Agent → Industrial Consumer:
Under this system, goods reach industrial consumer through the agent. Thus
there is only one middleman.
This distribution channel is the same as above, the only difference is that in
place of agent, there is wholesaler.
Under this channel there is no middleman and goods are directly sold to
industrial consumer. Railway engines, electric production equipment are sold by
this system.
Direct channel is popular for selling industrial products since industrial users
place orders with the manufacturers of industrial products directly.
(ii) The most appropriate channel is to link the domestic operations to the
overseas channels.
The principal forms of penetrating exports markets are selling to local export
houses or buying organisations for indirect exporting and appointing agents or
distributors for direct exporting.
In indirect exporting, the firm delegates the task of selling products in a foreign
country to an agent or export house.
(i) Who are the consumers? Which are the available retail outlets to reach them?
(ii) Which type of market coverage is required, keeping in view the product and
consumer characteristics?
(iii) Are there any internal constraints for the exporter like finance which will
influence the decision regarding choice of the distribution channel?
(iv) What are the expectations from the channel members? Are there some
specific expectations?
(v) What is the required support system to satisfy the expectations of the
channel members?
It should be realised that the distribution channel is the mechanism through
which the seller reaches the consumers and, therefore, the selected channel
must be suitable to the company’s operations and marketing strategy.
The pull approach of channel strategy relies much upon the intensive
promotional campaigns through advertising, personal selling and other
promotional efforts and attempts to develop brand loyalty among consumers of
the product in the market. The manufacturer is not much worried about the
channel. Through advertising, publicity of the product and sales promotional
activities, the manufacturer creates demand so that the consumers themselves
create a pressure on the distribution outlets to carry and sell his product.
The channel members attempt to store the product in their outlets to serve the
consumer best, because the consumer is sovereign. Thus, the manufacturer
neither establishes his own set-up in the foreign market nor does he contact the
middlemen to sell his product. The channel members are thus forced to contact
the manufacturer. Due to this very nature this strategy is known as pull
approach.
2. Push Approach:
Under this approach of distribution, the exporter should establish his own
channel of distribution and assume full control over it to use it as a promotional
instrument. The exporter, therefore, should make effective planning, establish
organisation to implement it and have effective control over it. The exporter will
function as the channel leader.
3. Gravity Approach:
The manufacturer should not worry at all for its distribution function. The
consumers do not know even who the producer of the product they are using is.
The manufacturer neither establishes his own sale organisation in foreign
market nor takes it seriously and the distribution work is done by the
middlemen.
Which strategy out of the above approaches should an exporter follow, is a very
difficult question to answer. A number of factors influence the choice. As far as
gravity approach is concerned, it has a very limited role to play in distribution of
goods in foreign markets. In modern age an exporter cannot find a place in an
export market passively.
The pull strategy requires substantial outlay of financial resources for intensive
sales promotion campaigns to create the demand for the product and develop
brand loyalty. The push strategy on the other hand does not involve such huge
costs. But it does require a proper discount structure and other incentives to
motivate the distribution channel members. In addition, the exporter must be
prepared to plan and partially finance proper sales promotional campaign.
For consumer products, both the strategies may be adopted in the foreign
countries. Smaller companies generally follow push strategy in distributing the
goods as its success depends more upon personal selling rather than financial
outlay. The big companies can employ pull strategy for mass consumption items
in developed countries.
Even in a developing country like India, large companies use this strategy. In
case of industrial products, on the other hand, companies, irrespective of size,
generally use the push strategy. The reason behind is that the number of buyers
is small and the outlets to be contacted are also lower which can be covered
through specialised sales force and does not require any mass advertising.
Further, the channel members will have to be integrated with the total
marketing system in order to ensure after sale service system.
As per Webster, the major points of difference between the push and pull
approaches may be indicated in the following manner:
In the case of Indian exporter, pull strategy will not suit because of limited
availability of foreign exchange. Gravity approach cannot be said to be the best
because involvement of exporter to some extent is necessary whereas the
strategy suggests quite a passive view. Thus, in Indian context it is better to
adopt push strategy. The exporter should establish his own channel of
distribution, manage and control it effectively through proper planning and
cooperation with the distribution channel members.
5. Level of Distribution:
The exporter may decide to sell either direct to importer or to an importer
wholesaler, distributor, super-markets, and chain of stores or shopping malls or
speciality stores. Which of these should exporter choose will depend on the
nature of his product, the size of the market environment of the country,
distribution cost and his own financial resources?
(i) Control:
The exporting company will have direct control over the marketing operations
and, therefore, can devise and implement the proper marketing strategy in tune
with the changing marketing conditions.
By selling directly in the foreign market, exporter can save the commission that
becomes payable to the agents. Moreover the manufacturer enjoys full returns
on the sales of his goods because he does not have to share profits with anyone.
In indirect exporting, the agents purchase the products at cheaper rates and sell
them to importing country at higher prices.
A new exporter’s name will be unknown in the foreign market, therefore, even
though the price and quality of the product may match those of known
companies, the new entrant will be at a disadvantageous position. In such a
situation, it would be better to gain credibility in the market if a known
distributor handle the product, because the standing of the distributor will help
in assuring the customers about the quality of the product.
Direct exporting requires large funds in order to support adequately the cost of
selling, to provide necessary credits, the expense of financing, the development
of an export organisation, engaging own staff.
In this system, the distribution cost is more. In direct exporting, export house
has to undertake the responsibility of marketing, while indirect exporting
enables the manufacturer exporter to concentrate on production problems,
leaving the question of foreign selling to the intermediaries.
Big and medium export firms generally prefer to appoint agents or distributors
in the foreign markets. In such a case, the exporting firm must evolve a system
of control and monitoring the agents for evaluating their performance.