MATER! BREAR APHGALE 6 An PPUCH PLAGE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA Ministry of Education nave? &TC 991/2016 PHETF PPVCH FEV PERT ‘Content Directive No. 991/2024 Directive for Higher Education AG PTOI harks ANery | institutions’ Institutional and Program mange Accreditation A Directive for Higher Education institutions LhELE PPUCH +N} PEST AG PT CIE AOS HANT AorOHT institutional and Program accreditation fae eeones In accordance with artele 19 sub article 4 of PANLROL HAD tamngq | Proclamation No1263/2021, by the powers and PIN Arm NON APE ¥EC 1263/2014 AIR 19 WON ADR 4 whet PPP UCR nk BUF oe? how P tet HEA AIS MPAA £591 PF &. hBC Con LY coos “Eh HPUCE bROTE Pak AT PTOI hors none mares KVC 99112016 “Hih> Amen RFA: x. baw, QAPE #PC 1152/2011 AG ALT kPC 515/2014 Phar CAPT AIM VIGr ALY svaVse ONT KA HIN responsibilities of the FDRE executive bodies, the ministry of education declared this directive. Part one Gen 1. Short tide ‘This directive shall be cited as “A Directive for Higher Education institutions’ institutional and Program accreditation directive number, 9912024” 2. Definitions Nobwithstanding interpretations stipulated on Higher Education Proclamation No. 1152/2011 and Council of Ministers’ Regulations No, 515/202, unless the context requires otherwise Vv “Regulation” shall mean theAA ECTS PONLAMOY HAUT NierPC A PrPUCTS = DAME — ANAM ALOR AAG FIC Aco@is PON LLLNECH PHC Mr LA #PC 515/204 tar 2 Rete bos TAT NNR TPUCH cod &HS WTR Aen PEP PRP NANA AbRI? bO-bs | ronans ret AACS AACTERAL MOLI AAHAM ALA HPC 515/014 AHR 6 ThA NHK 8 AbAM@ DAM conch AADAT AOhAd AHA 74" AERP POULAE RPE LIT, ari UPTCIP SOPs TAT NEE PPUCh oonh bee NPE AAs rar TOIT NMAMAMr ATONE OOF LOMO PRET AACR DAI = MANA REY AAdAM Ahad AHA hI POLAT LRG 191% 10%! B) “PR hoes ARAM AT Oher — TPVC aod bards NTE Ae PEP chee NADA ATK br ALA POMODrs Regulation No 515/2022, issued by the Councils of Ministers to determine the structure, power and functions of the Education and Training Authority. 2/ “Institutional Accreditation” shall surance accorded 10 a mean a quality licensed institution that has been working in the higher education sector as evaluated by the authority or according to the Council of Ministers’ Regulations No. 515/2022, article 6, sub-article 8, by an external body delegated by the authority to recognize that the institutional accreditation quality standards established by the authority are met. 3/ “Program Accreditation” shall mean a quality assurance accorded to a program that has been licensed to involve in the higher education sector as assessed by the authority or an extemal body delegated by the authority to recognize that the program accreditation quality standards established by the authority are met 4/ “Institutional Re-Acereditation” shall mean a quality assurance accorded to a licensed institution that has been working in the higher education level as re-assessed by the authority or an external body dclegated by the authority to ensure that the quality standards established by the authority for institutional re-accreditationPer AACE NAMTRA MAMAN WLP AANA Nohra mA HPI Atk POLAT PRG MIL ITN, “Or! BI PTO OPT ALIVE IAT Ohne PPC aehh bares NTE One eR TONE ANANDA ATCT bar AAT rona-> eat OS ACS AATIAE OI AHA Nohrar RA AIPIE ATOMS PLAT PDEA PNLIT, 1D* POPS AAMT” OTA ARIS ATCT ROT OLI hords DEAT Aerhar POLLED LEED flame Pitts YE i “PhO ANT haa" “AT APG AGIs COLARI! — PieeY AG TOTP AMG 67Cr DG POV, VAN omCPC POLLARD AIA wr 8) WP 20, hao" vIn AKI AE NTE rods —T9IT AL PLATE PAAMAMY PrarPs HAT Anor-6 104 B/ “ANE 127 Ahemer wT One e Trucr reert PLLC! OFASE AMET POLE fone yun hat are met. 5/ “Program Re-acereditation” — shall mean a quality assurance process in which 4 program that has been licensed to engage in the higher education sector is assessed by the authority or an external body delegated by the authority to ensure that the quality standards established by the authority for the program re-accreditation are met, 6/ “Acereditation process” shall encompass the entire process undertaken to conduct institution and program accreditation or re-acereditation. 7/ “Accreditation Council” shall mean an accrediting body nominated by the Director General of the authority to investigate and approve institutional and program accreditation reports and decisions thereto. 8/ “Assessor” shall mean an accreditation expert of the authority participating in the assessment of institutional and program accreditation, 9/ “Co-Assessor” shall mean an expert teaching at a higher education institution, working in the various industries, have membership in professional association and trained by the authority to take part in institutional and program accreditation along with the authority's accreditation experts.PUT AT AMADA AMT Mae MOET NOTE NdmMePTE dC Nowe NIL PRI ORI TLII Aa1P79 PALATE WO! VPI eFC NT AMAA FONard Pike wey PTOI — AAC wna Nee) rR OR TOIT oie ree ananan POULIN AYR Ot TB) PPE Tae on NIP 201, | OL OL Mare Acro ANA AS Ab ILO be ohh Shee | DLP LFCIT ADOPT WPT | WATE US AIBSKGOD ALLO? POLED UI Oi FR AOPTF IRAE” IAT trkov- a a WE RC NeoUa Net GATE ALEC ori TE] AOPSY ome MAE thor My enge ane Pht s SEP VCE Pe CDECH ED OTL NANA AL2VP Yar: ii) AR IE IN hoo OPE OL hOPT ALAT HTT) 2A AACA PUCK AR AoP/enitie LCT WLI Ntkov- | Ae PAE Arce ananAat | 107 “Self Evaluation Report® shall mean a document prepared by HEIs evaluating performance of their institution against institutional and program standarads put in place by the authority and submit the report to the authority, L1/ “Conflict of Interest” shall mean a relational condition which negatively affects the impartiality of the assessment process of the institutional and/or educational program accreditation process, as manifested between the institution seeking accreditation and the team of assessors participating in the evaluation process. 12/ “Withdrawal of acereditation” shall mean a situation where an institution withdraws from the process. of accreditation or renewal of accreditation at its own will, afler getting into the process. 13/ “Canceallation of accreditation” shall mean suspension of accreditation certificate awarded to HEIs by the authority, where the HEIs is proven (o have failed to maintain the standards stated in this directive. 14/ “Special Assessment” shall mean an accreditation assessment conducted by the authority when there is a major modification of the curriculum or valid complaints about the program after thePALLLD IIT Ori 1B) ‘ont IPP MAT boo Ques PETA WLP horeG ALA ATT 03 NEAL GONLCHT AL AMADA PLL DPIC YOrE TH “hoes tea AHA" IAT | PPPOE DAMG AANA we aaananys 6D are ooh | RTA OAT PAhma fas WNC OL PRI Ori Yo «tO» In ereTC ho OL Ach? Carr cA e-rAma- AMA YOs VOT WIS RI V--IARO LITTLE BI LOM GAL B, Pt8.8R ONT LY evades WIG NLTE TRO” PAE TVET PROVE AL 16K, BUSA bEA vit | na 1 #INCS She * NSGACE AG Phwaec eh §. DA AMPS ANT 8) VFO Cros DECKS renee ener teu bee institution are accredited or renewed its accreditation. 15/ “Limited Assessement” shall mean an accreditation assessement conducted in some selected aspects of the accreditation standards after the institution or program is granted an accreditation with conditions, 16/ “Accrediting body” shall mean the Education and Training Authority or a reputable professional association or institution delegated by the authority to give accreditation. 17/ “Person” shall mean any natural person or an organ with legal personality 18/ Any expressions in masculine shall include feminine expression as well 4. Scope of Application This directive applies for any higher education institutions operating in Ethiopia Part two Structure, Roles and Responsibilities, Standards and procedures of Accreditation 4. The Accreditation 1) Any HEI fulfilling the accreditation standards can apply for institutional and program accreditation. 2) The HET shall apply for accreditation using the prescribed application criteria should also attach self-evaluation reprt, student faction survey and datarE AG PTOM ha collection tool, oom RAPAA: 3) The application for institutional or RB ch@hG VAN COLCHEN program accreditation shall be made at a HI RTA TPIT YE CME anupiis eye ACS BOA EFC AT Pomc oh 27Cr — MbTeIeen 5. The Structure of Accreditation | The structure of the Accreditation department LECAIA shall be composed of: E eheer AG PTOI Aad>s 1/ Director General of the Education and PLE THN LFA PTD LOH ‘Training Authority o- 2Meputy Director General__—of Accreditation and Standardization. B/N AGES AONNT NEARY 3/The Accreditation Council Pha-PG AAT ALLHLE LoLNtAT 4iChief Executive officer for AIA BEGHA Accreditation Af eRPUCES name aAham? #5 S/Heads of the institutional and program rane accreditation Desk 8) PROPS AS ASIACKLALTID HET ie eennoeet eee eenan accreditation team of assessors. PHA PS 426HbC Ef RAMPS ANNE HOA 6. Powers and Responsibilities _of Director Bf OPT MOMMY aoe Pe. NNER, | General, Education and Training Athority BI Pres CFO harks gdh| Without prejudice to the Powers and DnAere Responsibilities granted by Regulation No Berne prea — parts | 515/2021, the Director General of Education and Angas bea te Training Authority shall: L/Nominate members of the accreditation WY ctrucks hams aanans 94 council out of ETA and establish appeal Wert hearing committee; 2/Ensure that the accreditation decisions APP UCTS DAME AMMAN NLA and other pertinent information have PC 515/2014 Pama CF GON Pap eteAare DIONE UE PLAT | A nAAAMY — arcu, PLO PROT OWA HAA LALIT AAT PPA 8 DOLE Pakorns 8 PharPG OAR AT AOE LPC LIP EY — rbhoog — AeTUNeAM PRT MAGUS FOr £29700 f pa@rs Ade TIE Ore PC Mes nner teu PROT renecne Pod PT AENEID RPGS BA ACHE ONG WIR bet LLCIAE 8 dharks IG ELIE DART PERG m4 Abcor NAO Peco Gl Po~k Ne —-bFDovar NOHAT AOMPS RIAMAY LOLI A PAAGE ACHE WML LLCIAE W Phoes AG OS ACALNTD Ce Phra 4 ARehtrC _+79CF Baer ATP UCTS dams aAhAM Aen BPC 5185/2014 eAMa tN Perr WTAE UE PLA Met SHEOGAH become accessible for the institution and the public access; 3/Ensure that complaints raised by HEIs pertaining to assessments and decisions on accreditation are dealt as per the grievance procedure in place; 4f€nsure that financial and material resources required to undertake accreditation processes and related issues are duly faciltated; 5/ Establish system and procedure that enable professional associations to participate in the accreditation process through delegation 7. Roles and Responsibilities _of Deput Director General for Accreditation and Standardization Without prejudice to the powers and responsibilities given to the Deputy Director General of Accreditation and Standardization by virtue of regulation No, $15/2022, the Deputy Director shall: 1/ Chair the accreditation counei 2/ Coordinate and control the institutional and program accreditation processes 3/ Announce decision made by the council to the authority and the HEIs and awards certificate to accredited institutions,BOVE horror NAAN Lawes BRAKES LTO ROS DAME VLA TLOANEA | LEMMA! 1) OA Gan AAADATME AT THOME LAO PAL IRI OPS ATE PROVE CADP M1L ITM eernnG weer Limes B RADET AATT HOA TCT phert Pros ATE haa kebiray Me Phoasa:: BI PMO LAE CU-20C LIES #027279, Nae. LPF COLCA PERM AG TOTEM hors hive EFCH AG POA UA CPC PREIA B/ AAha-WAe NAP AMET ATC home tanéirk ATPUCTE DAME MAMAN? PF ALSHEC VE Hay AMT LFEAAE PhO UCC ANATSE HNTPE AILMNTA BUG 8) POPE AG ASCARI NCE PHA PS ALEMEG (iN) 8) ehoiventins erever mek Ae, 8. Roles and _responsil Accreditation Council The accreditation council shall have the following roles and responsibilities: 1) Designs action plan for the accreditation council, 2/ Examines and approves the program accreditation decisions forwarded by the tcam of assessors 9. Number and Composition of members of th The accreditation council, being accountable to the Director General of the Authority, shall be ‘composed of the following nine members: \WDuply Director-General for Accreditation and standardization (Chairperson) 2/ Dupty Director General for Inspection, authentication and Control (Member) 3/Chief Executive Officer of Accreditation (Member and Secretary) 4/ Chief Executive Officer of Quality ‘Audit (Member) 5/ Representative of the Higher Education Division at Ministry of Education (Member) 6/ Four members appointed by the Director General of the authority based on criteria designated by the authority: one weITS ALGHEC (AMA) 1 ehMbG OMT ome Yd. DBR, (MOAT KYL) ORR A owe ped WERT, (ana): BMP NCH Mk ener PPUCT HCE rang, (AMA) MAMAN NLLONG avnd.cr ALT hOATAD APF AL Gb reyngom ne RN ARN RIS he LeoAtho Powe INC (ATEN hO-rG 1 WIS howyr ghee TPUCT PROT AG WIE NIA Phat PeUCH beT QUA: H Otek? ROG OLY AHR HA Anat PAE? AIS NIC APE NEE TPUCh PReTE LEI tOHe DAT L460: Bl MLU: APPR AR Ptoonhtt AMAMAM: omen, CeLevAY Pho“rrd- AMAT PAG How Ont Aor UF N27, Nteodar Abas oh Aart MAI PS ALG TL NAL evaded ALFA: DE Weeie er@haa ANA ehTT | PPUCH bE bake Ue hohse aPC PHA PS COLLIN A hua | from industries, one from the concerned professional association (for program accreditation only), one from public higher education institutions and the remaining one from private higher education institutions. 7! For institutional accreditation, in addition to those listed under this artele, there shall be one student representative of higher education institutions at a national level nominated by the Director General 8/ The term of service of members of the couneil represented from outside of the authority shall be three years and can serve for three additional years if re- elected. No member shall be elected more than two terms 9IA student represented from HEIs for the council shall serve as member of the couneil as long as he remains a higher education institution representative 10. Roles and Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Accreditation Council the decisions of the council and reports its implementation to the council; 2/ Supports the regular activities of the accreditation council; 3/ Holds minutes for each and every decision of institutional and programy IR. Pho-*G ho-wha nadrF Rah RULES PNIAME How's LEER A: 7 LOFT NTT HOA BUS CS DALE A) PhO OA, LAER DAALRACe Aha 62°C LOCAL e PhOPS ODA — omen PINT LEAGNE | f) OneIaT. eres PTOI | OPT OALPE 20-70% LOMA 8) AOS harernd- UL eae NANA P TS PROPS hod IAT heMPAL PANANOY 18 AMi LFA 8 Oty WHR “I Ag PEIARa* AEM UE POET HOA ANAL WIL hOALE AK AAA Ad LAME EI NOMA Aa, NeLANAAN 2b Chordie HAHA aubne IAG YP Nook ALC NI IAT AT Yat Bi) Phomd AIT LIPAO-A, Abed SPR NLU Uk hax rhe ANAM, SAN LIAO PAT Neo} New Susi 2 1 accreditation Meetings of the Accreditation Council 1/ The accreditation council’s ordinary ‘meetings shall be held four times a year. Members of the accreditation council shall decide the council's meeting schedule 2! Without prejudice to the provision of sub article lof this artele, the council chairperson shall arrange a extra-ordinary meeting as it deemed necessary. 3/ The acereditation council meeting shall be conducted only when 50% +1 members attend. 4/ Where equal number of votes are made for competing motions of the council decision, the motion voted by the chairperson of the council takes precedence. ‘Termination of membership of _ the Acereditation Council Membership of the accreditation council may terminate due to one of the following conditions: 1/By willfull resignation of a member; 2/ Due to disciplinary cases; 3/Unexcused absence from meetings for three consecutive meeting sessions. Roles and Responsibilities of _Chief Excutive for Ai mn Without prejudice to those granted to him by the authority, Chief Excutive for accreditation shallSHOWA AYE NLirke? PHIEEE ON ARLE RA Bl NPR NAMATH AAs HB) PMIDCAT PLAT AKI E/ ANNAAPE AL SAAR Noor a MAR APC: TE LAO-PS ANNE 096 Né- Ahé.K°% EPICS Sher PROPS AAMT aoe Dé WARM. PINCE PAGE AMADA FrAMar Aah VS PLAT ING PhTO-sa+ BI charhs eT cai 670% pho: LEIA TOO SDK EMG ook PRET MTAIAT Wha om hae bette Low Menet ANAL UT ATH AR TPIT RIRNNS PLCIN' 8 MAA OA, nek wn IPI NIAMS: PLC IDE have the following Roles and Responsibilities: 1 Presents the accreditation draft report to accreditation council; implements the decision; 2/ Recieves and examines quality improvement and follow up report of institutions each year; 3/ shall enforee conducting a special ‘assessment as deemed necessary; 4/Undertakes limited assessement based ‘on the council’s decision. 14, Roles_and Responsibilities of Head of the Accreditation Desk Without prejudice to those granted to him by the authority, Head of the Accreditation Desk shall have the following roles and responsibilities: 1! Organizes the accreditation team of assessers in accordance with the criterion put in place; ar Examines the accreditation applications, Data collection tools, student satisfaction survey reports and — self evaluation Report to the team of assessors; Dispatches team of assessors for field visit and coordinates the field visit activities; 3/ Examines the accreditation assessment report prepared by the team of assessors and presents it to chief executives for accreditation. oS NePhorks AAMT Sl DAG ICT DAGTE AMADA PhMar ADRbMIE VE POURS EINGE LnGarsa:: Bl Abbooma@ — aensC ohare PrMPG 199.999, VHF PRERAE # PhordG Tee MOAN PT Pare cone amide 67 Cr erie ACh SAA EZ AT LINIPIT NI LILIA * Nevin Mh cord SLITNAL AIPM, ME Lament KITT RT SNOT Pooh TO SUEANE AE F/M 27, 1 AN OER ebeND Pras 67 CF WME WA ANOPS ROMY avd NE DAM, LHCAA! TG. PAO-RG NOM 19°.9°9, EF PICS Das PROPS 197, HLF TIME SHGO-GA Bl Rhee KAODG PRL TaN: anes — aoi-nine ALE 67TH LEN ACH AAA Pepa CPC AG PINTIPION OF Lawley eo? B ShaPs 79707 PAIL A SUIKAL Pom TIED SHLAAT Rava IPO ALLEGE 5. Roles and Responsibilities of __the Accreditation Team of Assessors 1/ Examine the accreditation application document, data collection tools report, student satisfaction survey report and self- evaluation Report 2) Prepares schedule for accreditation assessment; undertake field examination 3/ Submits exit report regarding the assessment process for the institution up on the completion of the assessment work. 4/ Produces the assessment report and submits it to Head of the Desk. 5/ Determine the detailed roles and responsibilities of the team of assessors as well as their recruitment procedures as per the guidelines and work procedures of the authority, 6. Number and Composition of the Members of Team of Assessors 1/ The accreditation team of assessors shall be composed of five members. 2/ Three members of the team of assessors shall be selected from the authority's reditation experts while the remaining two members are selected from HEIs, from industries or from representatives of concerned professional associations. 3/ One of the members from the authority shall be chairperson, 4) The team of assessors shall select aAEP Or PRP NA TF WL Poon, AFC RUT gama BLIP IT EF CH NMIED ALAN Abs LHCNAT BL UCUG LID eR AIM Pre WU PET OAT heoee MAH AM — PALES ACH LOnsar TRL I OS NAT MES ONPG BI Phos AMP IIe MR APE NAAT LGA Yew, ee AMA | hnaanamy = fharbs hT Aho e PEE NES FONE Aheo-e DEE POUCH bee AG AIS DINE — MRI heLandivrar fame WAC Fone LUGAE f anAnAMr home NI NAN, LUGAE 6) MS NAA aPhHA Adhd Laem § BI UCC 17°27, WS" NEPELAG DAME Ate PAE ON Londra: Th. OA DS ACRE BI PERI HOPS AACR secretary from amongst themselves. 5/ Guidelines shall be developed for the detailed selection criteria and trainings of the team of assessors. 17, Standards 1/ Standards of Institutional accreditation a) Vision, Mission and Governance b) © Curriculum and Program Management c) Learning and Teaching 4) Assessment and Evaluation ) Students f) Academic and Support Staff g) Resources hy) Research and Community Engagemnt i) Continual Quality Improvement 2/ Standards of Program accreditation a) Program Outcome b) Curriculum c) Learning, Teaching and Assessment d) Students e) Academic Staff £) Educational Resources Research and Community Engagemnt h) Program Management i) Continual Quality Improvement The Accreditation Procedure WV The Procedures 18. accreditation ApplicationDV) GRRE PADD AG ANPALE A) CAE FPUCT AG PTOI howdsCINVP ALE ch) 1G TEC 1) PUGS 1901 w) rer 2) oP ved AG LIT Now, Nee F a) ereruct 70497 #) POPC AG MUN PL 0) Mert gaa eRe ore Acar BRT CTP hors A CRT v) °F OIE om A) AChE UCT ch) OTS HEMI AT PUT om) ewe w) gud 2) PPP UC 7097 1) POPE AG MTUNEAN 7275 P) PF OTI KOPeCINVESEC A) PMVTr gra PReb oHitL acnt TE. Phos nowy enwrac 1er Bl Chas PLE heen vy) thee oe ere AME TLE oranF NIA TIPU CICH Lave avis Nes 67CT a) Institutional or program accreditation application shall be submitted together with self Assessment report, data collection (ools report and the student satisfaction survey report. b) The accreditation application shall be prepared asper_—-ETA’s accreditation application formats and will be submiited manually or in a digital system. 2/ The Document review a) Head of the desk shall examine the accreditation application documents submitted by the institutions and ensure that it is eligble for field visit. b) Head of the desk shall organize a team of assessors and communicates them to the institution in accreditation process to ensure that there is no conflict of interest ©) The desk head shall Identifythe accreditation application documents that are not elighle for field visit and informs them to the institutions. 3/ The Field Visit 8) The organized team of assessors shall conduct field visit as per the delineated time table. ¢) The team of assessors shall validateRMA 27CH 2G ANG LCI! A) POPS “Toran Fa annAcr NeLeHEP Mo ras — Pee APecN ACHE PMT NEED oOLr TPA UT IDLE PPLE PR aoe’ LUG HONS ICawd- pv) ¢ehh Adam PROPS — Iowans — MAT Novell AG NIMNET Acoih | TAIT ft £697! A) PRA VAM 19°97 18" eres Oreos NLR PO naa Abele RE NAM a AAAAaMTs. £2,777 th) deodh TU ar LAETE PROPS MoPANF AG | OVE Mbkow LAar, EY Pooh 1-0 U) Pbekonae 1201, ED Atboomat PIIk AAA aohet Pooh MH PULA A) 120, eR MOR IME AG PED LIFO PHF Navi IPI LLITMAI th) 198 STP IOKY roLemsrbar DANLLO 29°77 from thorough examination of the application documents. ©) The team of assessors shall finalize the assessment process up on conducting an exit’ meeting and submitting the exit report to. the institutiton. 4/ The Accreditation Report Preparation a) The accreditation report shall be prepared as per the authority's report preparation guideline and report format based on the information and data obtained from the self evaluation report, data collection tools report, students’satisfaction survey report and the field visit. b) The chairperson of the team of assessors together with the accreditation desk officer shall submit the accreditation report to the chief executive officer for acereditation, 5/ ‘The Accreditation Decision Process 2) The Chief Executive Officer for accreditation shall submit the assessment report to the accreditation council ») Chairperson of the team of assessors shall present the assessment report to the council ©) The accreditation council shall pass the accreditation decision up on examining the accreditation report.Pavaren nk NLL Loran, 67 CK Aber IRV new LUGa BW E7C% WIE Vv) Path 29°79 67 CF PrN Ror AMAA FerCr ANKE ooPae — owAdh Us HII SFC ONAL MALL EFC! bee ACh AOA 27°C AT hoot THIF NII PH ener LUGAE A) P20, Ak AMAR, HRA PNA ICUS PLO EF Or CPC Marks AAT ond. dew ANAM, ECAH con, nM v) Phas ROME owe de ANGRY, ROPE C7 CTY AhO-PG hohe HOA, SECA A) P79°297, Ihr HAAN, P2777 6PCKY AOA SCA! IK PREIAE ch) PAOHG heOhar PeAAATS LrOPG 67Cr CPE ard, LAAGAE oo) tho-tna Anan, thar sna PEAAOrd arty ananadr PF Aeadobt Chairperson of the acereditation council shall announce result of the accreditation decision given by the council to the Director General of the authority and the institutions and awards the accreditation certificate to the accredited institution as well. 19. Accreditation Decision and Duration Based on the findings of the accreditation have | assessment conducted, the HEIs institutional and | program accreditation decisions shall be: 1/ Full Accreditation a) Is an accreditation granted to an institution or a program for a period of five years based on the accreditation assessment result of the institution or program falls in the highest category of the accreditation result cut off point stated in the guideline 2/ Accreditation with condition a) Is an accreditation granted to an institution or a program for a period of three years based on the accreditation assessment result of the institution oF program when its assessment result falls in the medium category of the accreditation result cut off point stated in the guideline. 3/ Denial of Acereditation a) The institution shall be denied accreditation when the institution's assessment result falls within the the lowest category of the accreditation result cut off point guideline set by the authority. b) The institution or program which is denied accreditation shall re-apply for accreditation one year after the date of denial of accreditation.Aree ShareaL WOU hoes ATT be Ph@S 1LI7% LPC Odd LAMA 1D. LAO-PG On, BG PSL Te AEE TPPUCH PRT Kbke AT TON — OPT — KMLAT OA APIO Ma omnes BI awe Rombs NELLIO PROPG TTT “behav wge FCN eto am ANANAAI Nomar farm amit Pe ahi NEE Mme | HAA ONT ATF AngII Soot POLAT LUA NUS PETRA ROrds MELLIO POPS TPIT -dstaw OL" TOI LTia ara AMAA NOM Porm aman oper avid cohha mnt HAA OAT APE Ad Govt POLAT LUGO f/ Pras WADA U) MERI Praha “79°97 thee WLI TOMI LT ior om anaham — amar Pomt a@ny ovpree avid Wbooma WPF Para HAA ONT ATE PeTHAHA LUGAT 20. Can ion of Accreditation The authority shall reassess the institution's accreditation decision any time and shall get its accreditation cancelled for either of the following reasons. a) Where the institution or program fails to maintan the systems and resources that were in place during the assessment time. b) Where the institution or program fails to request renewal of accreditation within the proper time range. ©) Where it is proved by evidence that the institution or the program has violated the legal procedures put in place by the authority. 21. Special Assessment Conditions that necessitate a special accreditation assessment: 1 Where the ministry of education or any other appropriate authority amends the educational system or policy; 2/ Where there is proof and evidence indicating that the accreditation granted to the program or institution is erroneous! faulty. 22. Limited Assessment Conditions that necessitate partial (limited) acereditation assessment: 1/ Conducted to prove that the institution or the program which has been granted fan accreditation on condition has addressed areas of improvement suggested by the time preconditions have been addressed. 2/ To promote an institution or a program