1 How has the author defined the issue?
The author identifies marijuana use as a
2 Does the author provide sufficient
background information for you to
understand the issue?
3 Is the issue clearly arguable? If not, why The author argues against legalizing
not?
4 How does the author establish that this
issue is important, and, thus, worthy of
discussion?
5 What is the writer's position on the
issue? Is the author's position presented
in a clear, assertive thesis statement?
6 What are the main arguments that the
author uses to support his position? Are
these arguments reinforced with
evidence (facts, statistics, expert opinion,
etc.)?
7 Are opposing positions fairly
presented?
8 Does the author present sufficient
reason to reject these opposing
positions?
9 Overall, does this paper convince
you/change your mind about this issue?
If not, why?
significant issue and advocates for its same
thorough investigation and study as any
other potential treatment, in line with FDA
standards.
Yes, the author provides a concise overview
of the evolving issue of legalizing marijuana
for medical use in the United States,
making it easy for readers to understand.
marijuana due to its potential negative
health and safety risks, citing evidence and
backup facts.
The author underscores the growing
legalization of marijuana for medical use,
highlighting the need for thorough
examination and consistent standards due
to limited research and contrasting medical
opinions.
The author argues against the use of
marijuana as a medicine due to its high
abuse potential, lack of medical use, and
need for further research.
The author argues that marijuana should
undergo the same scientific investigation as
any other medicine, despite limited
research indicating potential benefits. He
believes legalizing marijuana should be
based on scientific research, focusing on
identifying potential benefits, dosage levels,
and safe administration methods.
The text presents a fair opposition to
legalizing marijuana as medicine,
emphasizing the need for rigorous scientific
research and FDA approval, addressing
concerns about potential health risks.
Yes, the author presents evidence to
support their argument and presents
various research on marijuana for medical
use, demonstrating sufficient reason to
reject opposing positions.
Yes since, the paper presents a strong
opposition to medical marijuana use, citing
limited research, potential health risks, and
the need for FDA approval.