Kamid Buhari Manuscript

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 91

SECTORAL SATISFACTION ON COMMUNITY POLICING

ACTIVITIES IN PIKIT, COTABATO

BUHARI G. KAMID

Thesis Manuscript Submitted to the Department of Criminal Justice Education,


College of Art and Social Sciences, University of Southern Mindanao,
Kabacan, Cotabato in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY

MONTH

JANUARY 2024
BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

The researcher was born on December 14, 1997 in Paidu Pulangi, Pikit,

Cotabato. He is the second son among the five (5) children of Mr. Eddie Indong

Kamid and Mrs. Norhata Guiaplos Kamid.

The researcher finished elementary education at Datu Bitol

Mangansakan Memorial Elementary School, Paidu Pulangi, Pikit, Cotabato.

Then, he finished high school education in Datu Bitol Mangansakan Memorial

High School. He pursued tertiary education at the University of Southern

Mindanao, Kabacan, Cotabato and took Bachelor of Science in Criminology as

his degree.

BUHARI G. KAMID
Researcher

ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researcher would like to express his sincere gratitude to the following

individuals who have played pivotal roles in the completion of this study:

Ma’am Mariz P. Balquin, PhD, the Chairperson of Criminal Justice

Education and her adviser, for her unwavering support, mentorship, and

patience throughout this research journey. Her expertise and encouragement

have been instrumental in shaping this work.

Sir Marcos F. Monderin, MA, JD, the College of Arts and Social Sciences’

Dean, for allowing this study to be conducted.

Sir Vicente T. Delos Reyes, PhD, the Department Research Coordinator,

for his guidance and feedback that were invaluable to me.

Ma’am Roselyn M. Clemen, MPA and Sir Bernard M. Escarza, MA, for

their professional comments and suggestions as the examining panel.

Great appreciation to Jay, Andrei, Hamsamin, Aldihan, Bads, Omar,

Saudi, Datu Ali, Nhaif, Haidar, and Norhasim, for their friendship and support

from the very beginning. Sir Zuharto G. Dadtugan, Shafier Usman and Norman

Utto, for them, conflict academic schedule is not a hindrance to cheer and

support the researcher that spiritually and morally helped the researcher finish

this work.

iii
Especially, he would like to thank his dearest Morsalin Dimampao for

pushing him to finish this study, even he is on the verge of quitting, she would

still encourage the researcher to finish what he have started.

Unending thanks to his loving mother, Norhata G. Kamid, and to his

father, Eddie I. Kamid, for their unwavering belief in the researcher which has

been a constant source of motivation. Their love and support have sustained

the researcher through the challenges of this endeavor.

Above all, to the Almighty Allah (S.W.T) for hearing his prayers and

blessing him knowledge. Alhamdulillah.

iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PRELIMINARIES
Title Page i

Approval of Thesis Manuscript Error!


Bookmark not defined.

Acceptance of Thesis Error!


Bookmark not defined.

Biograpgical Data ii

Acknowledgement iii

Table of Contents vi

List of Tables ix

List of Figures ix

List of Appendices xi

Abstract xii

INTRODUCTION 1

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 9

Community Oriented Policing Activities 9


Level of Satisfaction on Community Policing Activities 12
Business Sector 13

Education Sector 16

Government Sector 17

Youth Sector 18

Religious Sector 19

Public Trust in the Police 20

vii
Related Studies 22

METHODOLOGY 24

Research Design 24

Locale of the Study 24

Respondents of the Study 25

Sampling Procedure 25

Research Instrument 25

Data Gathering Procedure 26

Statistical Analysis 26

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 28

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit


on Community Policing Activities in terms of Police Visibility 28

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on


Community Policing Activities in Terms of Police Community Relation. 32

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on


Community Policing Activities in Terms of Police Checkpoint. 38

Level of Trust of Sectoral Groups in the Police Officers 43

Significant difference between the level of satisfaction of resident 53

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 55

LITERATURE CITED 58

APPENDICES 62
CURRICULUM VITAE 78

viii
LIST OF TABLES

Table Title Page

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion,


1 Pikit on Community Policing Activities in terms of 31
Police Visibility

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion,


2 Pikit on Community Policing Activities in terms of 36
Police Community Relation

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion,


2.1 Pikit on Community Policing Activities in terms of 42
Police Checkpoint

Level of Trust of Sectoral Groups to the Police


3 Officers 51

Significant difference between the level of


3.1 satisfaction of residents according to sectoral 54
classification.

ix
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Title Page

1 Conceptual Framework 8

x
LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Title Page

A Actual Budget of the Research 63

B Application for Manuscript Defense 64

C Letter to the Department Chairperson 65

D Letter to the Dean 66

E Letter to the Barangay Captain 67

F Informed Consent Form 68

G Survey Questionnaire 70

H Reliability Test 74

I Certificate of Statistical Analysis 75

J Certification of English Critic 76

K Certification of Expert Validation 77

x
ABSTRACT

KAMID, BUHARI G. 2024. Sectoral Satisfaction on Community Policing


Activities in Pikit, Cotabato. BSCrim Thesis. College of Arts and Social
Sciences, University of Southern Mindanao, Kabacan, Cotabato. 90 pp

Adviser: MARIZ P. BALQUIN, PhD

The purpose of this study was to determine the satisfaction of local

residents on community policing activities implemented by the Philippine

National Police (PNP) in Poblacion Pikit, Cotabato. It aimed to determine the

level of satisfaction of the residents on community policing activities, the level

of trust of sectoral groups in the police officers, and lastly, the significant

difference in the level of satisfaction of the residents when analyzed according

to their sectoral classification. Throughout extensive evaluation on the data

gathered, the study concluded that majority of residents are satisfied in terms of

police visibility, police-community relations, and police checkpoints. In terms of

level of trust, only the government sectors who trust PNP in addressing

community concerns and issues, while the majority of residents in sectoral

groups in business, education, religion, and youth are not satisfied. Additionally,

sectoral groups in business, education, government, religious, and youth are

satisfied with PNP manner and ethics. Furthermore, there is no significant

difference in the level of satisfaction of the residents when analyzed according

to their sectoral classification.

x
Keywords: Community Policing, PNP and Residents.

x
1

INTRODUCTION

The community policing model has resulted in beneficial and

collaborative relationships between the public and the police in numerous

communities. Novak et al. (2003) stated that the development of such

relationships creates an interdependence between the public and the police,

who must do their share to bring about meaningful improvements in public

safety. Communities across the United States have expressed satisfaction with

the interactive and interpersonal nature of the community policing model,

indicating the model's relatively new and growing importance in our

neighborhoods (Ford, 2020).

The adoption of community policing calls for a commitment over an

extended period of time. This constitutes a substantial divergence from both the

traditional methods of policing and the image that is conveyed of police

personnel in the media. Prevention or collaboration techniques are used either

as an alternative to or in addition to repressive approaches. As a consequence

of this, community policing is pitted against other institutional logics at play

within police forces, such as the fight against criminal activity and the exercise

of managerial control (Terpstra & Salet, 2019).

Many people in the area, especially in the South, are afraid to leave their

homes due to the high crime and violent death rates. Despite their importance

in reducing crime and violence, police officers are often the ones who inflict
2

unwarranted harm on innocent bystanders. By fostering better police visibility,

police-community interactions, and the employment of problem-oriented

policing approaches that address people's problems, community policing strives

to improve outcomes. When citizens help police solve problems and the police

respond positively, trust is bolstered and future cooperation is made easier.

Community policing has spread to every continent, although it has been shown

to be successful in developed nations, there is less systematic evidence that it

does the same for countries in the Global South in terms of building trust and

decreasing crime rates. (Blair et al., 2021)

Anent to this, locally, it has been a decade of killing incidents and other

related chaos activities in the town of the Pikit that made its part of history and

majority of the cases were in floating status or unsolved, therefore, the

researcher wants to determine if the residents are satisfied on the policing

activities implemented by the PNP in the locality amidst the controversy of

killings in Pikit, Cotabato.

The general objective of the study is to determine the level of satisfaction

of the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato on Community Policing Activities

implemented by PNP in the said area, to determine the level of trust of sectoral

groups to the police officer, and, to determine the significant difference on the

level of satisfaction of the residents when analyzed according to their sectoral

classification.
3

This study is beneficial to the following: first and foremost, the people of

Pikit will gain from this research since it provides a forum for them to share their

thoughts on the community policing initiatives in their area. Second, this study

will facilitate the expression of opinion and feeling across all sectors regarding

the PNP's police system, and it will serve as a reference or basis for the local

law enforcement of Pikit to see the gray areas of their activities and for further

refinement. And lastly, this will be useful for scholarly and academic work on the

topic of satisfaction in law enforcement in the future.

Pikit residents can use this study to gauge the effectiveness of local law

enforcement and voice their thoughts on community policing initiatives.

The Pikit police force can use the survey results as a springboard for

improvement by focusing on areas where respondents have expressed

concerns.

The study was conducted in Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato during the 1st

semester of the year 2023-2024.

Operational Definition of Terms

Business Sector – a specific industry or field of economic activity in which

companies and organizations operate. It represents a broad

categorization of businesses that share common characteristics,

products, or services.
4

Community Policing Activity – a concept that promotes the use of

collaboration and problem-solving strategies to address public safety

concerns such as crime, social disorder, and crime fear. Its

organizational strategies help to assist the systematic approach to

addressing the immediate factors that cause these challenges.

Education Sector - various entities providing public education. These entities

include education providers, schools, colleges, universities,

organizations, agencies, businesses, and government bodies such as

unity assemblies, councils, legislatures, senates, houses of

representatives, parliaments, and local or regional governments. Each

plays a role in fulfilling the responsibility and purpose of educating the

public.

Government Sector - the total macroeconomic sector that comprises all levels

of government (federal, state, and local). The major job of the

government sector, often known as the public sector, is to impose on the

rest of the economy resource allocation decisions that would not be

made otherwise.

Level of Trust - refers to the confidence, faith, or belief that individuals or

communities have in the ability of law enforcement personnel to carry out

their duties effectively, fairly, and in accordance with the law, while also

upholding the principles of justice and maintaining the safety and security

of the community.
5

Police checkpoint - a law enforcement practice where officers set up a

designated location on a road or highway to stop and inspect vehicles

and their occupants.

Police-community Relation - a philosophy and approach to law enforcement

that emphasizes building positive and collaborative relationships

between police departments and the communities they serve.

Police Visibility - presence and availability of law enforcement officers in public

areas and within communities. It involves police officers being readily

seen and accessible to the public as they patrol, monitor, or engage with

the community.

Sectoral Satisfaction - how happy someone is with their job in a specific

industry. It includes things like company culture, team dynamics, growth

opportunities, and recognition. It's important for overall job satisfaction

and well-being.

Youth Sector – youth-serving community-based organizations often work

outside of the classroom.


6

Hypothesis of the Study

The hypothesis of the study will be tested at 0.05 level of significance.

Ho: There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction of the

residents when analyzed according to their sectoral classification in terms of:

a. Business sector

b. Educational sector

c. Government sector

d. Youth sector

e. Religious sector
7

Theoretical Framework

This study is anchored on the Theory of Community Policing

(Trojanowicz,1992), which is based on Normative Sponsorship Theory and

Critical Social Theory. Under order to meet their own needs, most individuals

are assumed to be cooperative under Normative Sponsorship Theory. Police

and people can benefit from critical social science by better understanding the

proximate causes of their challenges. In community policing, people and law

enforcement work together to address issues in their area, with the goals of

appeasing locals' concerns and improving their quality of life. A community

police officer's duties are similar to those of a social scientist who acts as a

problem-solving facilitator and catalyst.

Citizens' participation in issue definition, planning, and implementation,

as well as the evaluation of whether or not their requirements have been

satisfied, are crucial to community policing's success. Founded on the premises

of normative sponsorship theory, community policing is an example of critical

social science in practice.


8

Conceptual Framework

Level of Satisfaction on
Sectoral Classification Community Policing
Activities

Figure 1. This figure shows the conceptual framework of the study


REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This portion of the paper synthesized research given in local and

international journals that addressed the topic of sectoral satisfaction on

community policing initiatives.

Community Oriented Policing Activities

Among the most well-known police-community relationships is

Community Oriented Policing (COP). Accountability, decentralization,

collaboration, and problem-solving adjustments within law enforcement

agencies are essential to the success of COP (Connell et al., 2008).

Numerous COP efforts are now underway in various parts of the

country, each with its particular specialization. For instance, the LAPD's

Community Safety Partnership (CSP) program seeks to reduce crime while

strengthening ties between CSP officers and locals who have a stake in the

department's success (Leap et al., 2020). The National Police

Athletic/Activities League (PAL) seeks to minimize adolescent criminality and

violence via mentoring, community service, athletics, and other extracurricular

activities. PAL's overarching mission is to reduce juvenile crime, and one way

it does this is through fostering better relationships between young people and

law enforcement. Teens aged 14 and up can participate in the Phoenix Police
10

Department's Cadet Program, which introduces students to professions in law

enforcement through social events, community service, leadership training,

personal fitness training, and outdoor activities (Phoenix Police Cadet

Program, n.d.). 'Enforcement,' which may mean anything from lowering crime

rates to introducing individuals to jobs in law enforcement, is the primary or

overarching goal of many communities policing efforts (Padilla et al., 2023).

Law enforcement agencies require a sufficient number of personnel to

assign patrol officers to manageable geographic zones if they are to maximize

opportunities for involvement with the community. They should also give

incentives for police who adhere to these regulations, as well as providing

problem-solving training for patrol officers and administrators (Leap et al.,

2020). Technology can also strengthen communal partnerships. According to

Hickman and Reaves (2001), crime mapping in communities can help

institutions evaluate problems and develop lasting solutions.

Having a common goal, like reducing crime in the area, can strengthen the

efficacy of a regional data sharing agreement. To be successful, this initiative

requires the use of state-of-the-art resources by all collaborating organizations.

A written agreement between the police and government organizations involved

in the data sharing collaboration is useful for addressing privacy concerns

regarding privacy and outlining the purpose to solve problems. Instead of trying

to exchange regional data between jurisdictions, it may be more efficient to


11

focus on partnerships inside a particular jurisdiction in order to handle local

problems (Boba et al., 2009).

In community-based crime prevention, also known as proactive problem-

solving, police personnel look beyond individual events to address systemic

issues. Police officers have been trained to collect data that will help them solve

societal problems and prevent future crimes (Tyler et al., 2015).

In the Philippine context, Community policing initiatives consist of police

outreach, police presence, and police checkpoints. It stresses the need of

community involvement and collaboration. Managers in the police department

will see the connections between their work and those of social service

organizations that assist with things like housing, welfare, and finding a job. The

police force of the future will see itself as part of a larger community-wide

initiative to not just reduce crime but also enhance residents' quality of life.

Reference: (2012's Police Community Relations Manual).

Joaquin (2005) found that the training and technology accessible to the

police force in her study on police community relations and the efficacy of the

PNP in the province of Ilocos Norte. Motivating the police force requires offering

them the same respect and opportunity as the rest of the public.

To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of local law enforcement, it

is essential that the police chief and officers work together to foster positive

police-community relations.
12

Level of Satisfaction on Community Policing Activities

The impact of community policing on crime, fear of crime, public

satisfaction with police, and police officer work satisfaction are just some of

the topics that have been the focus of empirical study. Citizens who have a

positive impression of the police are less likely to feel unsafe, are more inclined

to help authorities, and are less likely to conduct crimes themselves, according

to the vast majority of studies (Tyler, 2003).

The impacts of crime on our economy, health, and happiness are

widespread and far-reaching. The quality of life for both individuals and the

larger community is negatively impacted by crime. But the police force is the

most obviously available to tackle crime around the clock, every day of the

week. According to Morgan (2001), law enforcement's main job is to stop

criminals from breaking the law and apprehend those who do. However, it is

impossible for the police to combat crime without the active participation of the

community.

The term "community relations" refers to the measures taken by the

criminal justice system as a whole to boost its reputation in residential areas.

For example, the phrase "Police cannot succeed in solving or preventing crime

without the assistance of the community" lends credence to this point of view.

Therefore, cooperation and involvement from the public are necessary for

efficient crime prevention. This conclusion emphasizes the need for cooperation
13

between the community, local government, and law enforcement in the fight

against crime. This has led several countries to prioritize community policing.

Understanding the dynamics of human relations, agents of the criminal

justice system is a must to be able to utilize and implement the various

techniques designed to reach the community (Sombrio & Branca, 2017).

Community policing is currently the most effective method of policing.

Business Sector

According to The University of Kansas (2023), either the community

as a whole or its residents as individuals and groups gain from community-

friendly policies. They work to bind community ties and encourage positive

development and growth. Community-friendly policies in some communities

may also help the community maintain its unique characteristics, historic

buildings, and traditions rather than forcing it to fit into a different mold.

Others may benefit from the change or adaptation that community-friendly

policies can bring about. In the end, these are measures that improve the

community's health and quality of life. In order to enhance community life,

promote community development, and build healthy communities, businesses

and the government can adopt certain social, health, economic, and

environmental policies. This section discusses these policies and how

community builders can persuade them to do so. The community's needs

should always be taken into account when making policy decisions.


14

Businesses and the government must begin to view communities not

only as places where people live but also as a shared experience in which

each member participates and gains something. In reality, there are many

different types of community-friendly policies, such as those that are social,

health-related, economic, or environmental. Under "social," we could group

"political" and "cultural," which can be the outcomes of either business or

government or even both. They might be unintentional byproducts of self-

interest or they might be directly aimed at goals that benefit the community.

In that implementing such policies may be advantageous to a business, a

branch or agency of government, a public servant, and the community,

they frequently combine the advantages of the two. Governments can enact

social policies on behalf of entire communities, states, or nations; businesses

can do the same for their own employees or, in some cases, for all workers

in a specific group or industry through a trade association or agreement. in

favor of local arts and culture. Businesses can significantly improve the quality

of community life by sponsoring events, putting art on display in public areas

of their buildings (as many banks do), and in other ways to support leisure.

Numerous companies support local sports leagues, charity golf outings, and

youth sports teams.

Many businesses give their employees the option of becoming part-

owners by allowing them to purchase company shares. This can be

dangerous because many Enron employees who made significant


15

investments in the company lost everything when it failed, but it also means

that employees have a voice in how the business is run and a stake in its

success. A company that tries to source materials and supplies locally, even

if it results in a small price premium, is following a policy that supports the

neighborhood. Restaurants frequently work to support regional agriculture

by, for instance, making direct purchases from local farmers. Numerous

companies keep an on-site fitness center (gym, workout area, outdoor jogging

track, etc.), sponsor walking or jogging clubs or lunchtime sports, or offer to

pay for employees' health club memberships. Businesses have the option of

only providing healthy food in their on-site cafeterias. Employees who eat

well can control their weight and prevent diabetes, heart disease, and a

variety of other illnesses. The business sends out a crew of workers on a

regular basis to clean up the roadside in order to maintain a mile or two of

local roadway free of trash and debris. Many businesses take part in

beautification activities that are also good for the environment, like planting

flowers and trees on their lots and cleaning them up. The adoption of

community-friendly policies is frequently more complex than simply choosing

one course of action over another for business or the government. It involves

a shift in perspective regarding a community's makeup and what matters to

the economy and society. Promoting community-friendly policies may

therefore require time and careful consideration.


16

Education Sector

Comrie (2019) stated that any environment, including schools, can

benefit from community policing. School resource officers (SROs) and school

safety staff can help create a productive and rewarding environment for

students, teachers, and administrators by adhering to community policing.

SROs are able to provide positive interactions between youth and law

enforcement while also serving as a strong role model for students. The idea

behind community policing is that law enforcement and the community should

collaborate to ensure everyone in the community is safe. A law enforcement

agency can approach public safety in a thorough, proactive manner by

participating in partnerships, problem-solving, and organizational change.

Some students find that the SRO gives them a chance to work constructively

and non-confrontationally with law enforcement. It is crucial that educational

institutions and law enforcement organizations come to an understanding

regarding the obligations and responsibilities of SROs, as well as their

function in terms of punishment and discipline. To help students, teachers,

staff, and school administrators create a safe environment, officers can use

the community policing principles of problem-solving, partnerships, and

organizational transformation.
17

Government Sector

Furthermore, when community policing incorporates the general public

into police institutions, many governments have come to the realization that they

can no longer monopolize the business of security in local domains. This

approach calls for a paradigm shift. People are more than ever required to play

many complementary roles in the security affairs of their communities, as

opposed to leaving the job of policing entirely to the state and the police.

Consequently, the state (or government) has no mandate to identify the people's

security needs, but the people themselves should make the final decision

regarding their own security. In light of this, a lot of governments have started

to implement community policing for efficient security management. It is crucial

to rally support for community policing as soon as possible. Police chiefs must

gain support from all levels of the organization both internally and externally,

including from the local government, public and private agencies, the media, as

well as other policing organizations in a particular community or across the

country. Despite the rising popularity of community policing, one of the

fundamental difficulties facing law enforcement agencies has persisted as a

result of the inability to accurately define the term. The conceptual issue may

simply be caused by the philosophical principles that support different things to

different people because of the concept (Kasali et al., 2016)


18

Youth Sector

Carter (2023) argued that police departments use community policing

as a method of law enforcement in an effort to improve relations between

citizens, particularly youths, and police officers. In order to jointly identify and

solve problems, community policing aims to enhance police-community

interaction and communication. Depending on the needs of their community,

law enforcement agencies can employ a variety of community policing

strategies. By collaborating with local residents to identify and address issues,

community policing aims to increase public safety. Police officers address

issues relating to crime, youth, and community well-being in collaboration with

neighborhood institutions like schools, churches, and social service

organizations. Specialized initiatives like youth mentoring, anti-gang

campaigns, and task forces for community-based policing concentrate on

particular problems or populations. Community policing may be effective in

lowering crime for a number of reasons. The first benefit of community policing

is the increase in community and police trust. Respect and trust are increased

when the police collaborate with the community to identify and address issues.

Second, through community policing, the police are able to build rapport with

the residents of their beats. People are more likely to report crimes or give

information about criminal activity when there is a good rapport between them.

Another strategy is for organizations to host neighborhood gatherings like

block parties, barbecues, and youth sports leagues. Residents have the
19

chance to interact with police officers at these events in a friendly

environment.

Religious Sector

Localized religious conflict has not yet been addressed as a significant

focus of community policing, despite being a key component of its policy. The

goal of community policing is to promote peace through long-term processes

of communication, problem-solving, and shared management. It adopts a

citizen-centric approach. In order for community policing to be successful,

various agencies must work together and in concert. Working together with

other agencies is necessary in order to manage crowds, traffic patterns, and

processions, as well as support from the public—many members of which

volunteer their time to support the police. Successful policing requires an

inherited institutional infrastructure that incorporates the types of resources

used by community police: long-standing relationships with members and

leaders of local religious groups as well as of other societal groups, in-depth

familiarity with local religious practices of which festival observance is only

one of many, cooperative working relations with the city, state, and national

administrations, a history of protecting human rights that aspires to the same

standards as the community police, and a history of working with the local,

state. Community policing is dependent on a political, administrative, and

strategic infrastructure, especially when it comes to resolving disputes


20

between religious or ideological groups (Kapoor et al., 2022).

Public Trust in the Police

Only when police act fairly, equally, professionally, and firmly can the

public have faith in them. The police have been given the responsibility of

maintaining order, which includes the authorization to use physical force if

necessary.

As Gagnon and Fox (2021) point out, in democracies where citizens have

a say in whether or not the police have the right to act in their name, public faith

in the police is crucial.

Crisp (2017) argues that people have faith in the police when they are

able to ensure their safety. Legitimacy, defined as "the judgment that ordinary

citizens make about the rightfulness of police conduct and the organizations that

employ and supervise them" (Emsley, 2013), is enabled by trust since it rests

on the assumptions of goodwill, loyalty, and a common ethical framework.

People are more likely to help the police in their efforts to maintain order and

keep the peace when they believe the police are legitimate and can be trusted.

However, one cannot just assume such faith. As Emsley (2013) points out, trust

is easily broken because of how precarious it is in most human relationships.

According to him, variables both inside and outside of police control affect the

level and presence of trust. Distrust in law enforcement is widespread in post-

conflict and post-authoritarian cultures with high levels of social division


21

(Mourtgos et al., 2017). It has been observed that trust allows people to simplify

their lives and feel more secure by taking their important connections for granted

(Warren, 2019).

Crisp (2017) claims that people have varying degrees of faith in the

police's sincerity and concern for the communities they patrol. Public confidence

in law enforcement arises when the public recognizes police officers as

trustworthy professionals committed to upholding the law and carrying out their

institutional duties on behalf of all residents. According to Gross and Gavin

(2020), public faith in authorities like the police depends on whether or not they

use that power for the benefit of the people they are sworn to protect and serve.

According to Sato (2017), a rational choice explanation of trust requires

both the knowledge of the trustor and the knowledge of the trusted. It's obvious

that the foundations of trust are the trustee's motivations and knowledge. Only

when residents have a solid understanding of the police and their methods, as

well as clear expectations of what to expect from them, will they be able to put

their faith in law enforcement.

The police must earn the public's trust by living up to the public's

reasonable expectations of them. Trusting someone comes with its own set of

dangers and rewards (Sato, 2017), and individuals are more likely to give their

trust to the police if they believe it will help them get the services they need.

When the public lacks sufficient understanding of the individuals and there are

no incentives to trust them, distrust in the police will increase. The rational
22

choice framework makes observable assumptions about the development of

public trust in law enforcement.

Related Studies

The study entitled “Citizen Satisfaction with Police and Community

Policing’’ conducted by Yuksel and Tepe (2013) attempts to clarify the topic

of how happy locals are with their police force in a community policing setting.

In particular, it hopes to examine how factors like police interaction quality and

assessments of police performance in terms of engagement with the

community affect things like victimization and a sense of neighborhood safety.

According to the results, assessments of police performance were the single

most critical factor in determining whether or not citizens were satisfied with

the police. Safetiness perception was a modest predictor of resident

happiness. The research verified the hypothesized dissatisfaction of persons

who had experienced past victimization or a lack of safety with the police

force. Implications for community policing initiatives to boost civilian

satisfaction with police were found. The study validates the value of the

central idea of community policing by showing a favorable correlation between

police ratings in terms of engagement with the public and increased

satisfaction with police. In this regard, it is crucial for police forces to garner

public support and engagement.

Many studies have been undertaken on the impact of community


23

policing on crime, fear of crime, public satisfaction with police, and police

officer job satisfaction, as stated by Tyler (2003). Those who have a positive

impression of the police are less likely to conduct crimes themselves, less

likely to dread being a victim, and more willing to collaborate with them.

According to Hwang et al. (2006), several researchers have found that

citizens' perceptions of their own safety are a crucial factor in their level of

satisfaction. When adjusting for factors like ethnicity and age, most studies

found that people who felt comfortable in their areas also had a positive view

of law enforcement.

In another study entitled “Community Satisfaction on Philippine National

Police Services’’, Auguis et al. (2018) used descripted method to determine the

level of satisfaction of the Philippine National Police’s Services in Nasipit,

Agusan del Norte Philippines as basis of development program. Results

revealed that the majority of respondents to the survey strongly agreed that the

PNP does a good job of enforcing the law, maintaining public order, fostering

positive relationships within the community, and ensuring the public's sense of

safety.
24

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

The researcher used the descriptive – comparative design. The design

considers two variables as not manipulated and establishes a formal procedure

to conclude that one is better than the other.

Locale of the Study

The study was conducted in Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato from 2023-2024.

Pikit, officially the Municipality of Pikit (Maguindanaon: Ingud nu Pikit; Iranun:

Inged a Pikit; Hiligaynon: Banwa sang Pikit; Cebuano: Lungsod sa Pikit;

Tagalog: Bayan ng Pikit), is a first class municipality in the province of Cotabato,

Philippines. According to the 2015 census, it has a population of 154,441

people.

It is the most populous municipality and local government unit in the

province of Cotabato. The municipality is bounded on the north by the

Municipality of Aleosan, on the south by Pagalungan, Maguindanao, on the

west by the Municipality of Midsayap and the Liguasan Marsh and on the east

by the Municipality of Datu Montawal.


25

Respondents of the Study

The respondents of the study were grouped according to their sectoral

classification. Each sector had thirty (30) respondents, totaling one hundred fifty

(150) respondents, divided among five (5) sectors.

Sampling Procedure

Convenience sampling was used in this study, it is a non-probabilistic

sampling technique in which units are included in the sample because they are

the most accessible to the researcher, and equal allocation sampling is a

method used in statistics to select a representative sample from a population.

Research Instrument

This study used adapted questionnaire based on the 2012 Revised

Police Community Relations Manual as a tool to gather primary data. The first

part of the questionnaire focused on determining the level of satisfaction on

community policing activities. The second part of the questionnaire focused on

the level of trust of respondents to the police officers.


26

Data Gathering Procedure

The following are the procedure conducted by the researcher to gather

necessary data for the research: first, the researcher identified the respondents

after recognizing that he had a letter of permission to gather data as prepared.

After that, the researcher spoke to the barangay officials, explicitly to the

barangay chairman, and requested permission to perform the study before

administering the questionnaire. Upon approval, the researcher further

conducted the study and established a report for the respondents to answer the

sectoral satisfaction on community policing activities in Poblacion Pikit,

Cotabato.

Statistical Analysis

The data gathered were tallied and analyzed using the following

statistical tools:

Frequency counts and percentages were used to describe the

respondents' sectoral classification.

Mean was used to assess the level of satisfaction of the residents of

Poblacion, Pikit regarding Community Policing Activities.

ANOVA or Analysis of Variance was used to determine if there was a

significant difference in the level of satisfaction among the residents when

analyzed according to their sectoral classification.


27

To interpret the mean, a four-point Likert scale was used, with the

following criteria for data interpretation:

SCALE WEIGHTS
DESCRIPTIVE
INTERPRETATIONS

4 3.50 - 4.0 Highly Satisfied

3 2.50 - 3.49 Satisfied

2 1.50 - 2.49 Dissatisfied

1 1.0 - 1.49 Highly Dissatisfied


28

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the results and discussion of the study. It is divided

into three (3) sections. The first section presents the level of satisfaction of the

residents of Poblacion, Pikit on community policing activities in terms of police

visibility, police community relations, and police checkpoints; followed by the

level of trust of sectoral groups in the police officers; and lastly, the significant

difference between the level of satisfaction of residents according to sectoral

classification.

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community


Policing Activities in terms of Police Visibility

Table 1 presents the level of satisfaction of residents on community

policing activities in terms of police visibility, categorized by sector. The study

revealed that the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, and Cotabato are generally

satisfied with the active presence and patrolling of law enforcement officers as

it obtained a mean of 2.76. This implies that law enforcers in Pikit are engaging

with the community, resulting in improved safety and overall well-being. The

finding is attributed to the respondents’ satisfaction that in the business sector,

residents expressed satisfaction with police personnel conducting mobile

patrols in the community (mean = 2.97), responding promptly to emergency

situations (mean = 2.60), establishing regular "standing and watch" posts for
29

police visibility (mean = 2.77), conducting "beat patrol duties" on local and

national roads (mean = 2.63), and area visits to deter potential insurgents or

gang groups (mean = 2.80).

In the education sector, satisfaction levels were high for mobile patrols

(mean = 3.10), prompt responses to emergencies (mean = 2.53), "standing and

watching" posts (mean = 2.70), "beat patrol duties" (mean = 2.70), and area

visits (mean = 2.77). Similarly, the government sector showed satisfaction with

mobile patrols (mean = 3.03), emergency response (mean = 2.57), "standing

and watching" posts (mean = 2.73), "beat patrol duties" (mean = 2.63), and area

visits (mean = 2.73).

The foregoing results imply that police have effectively engaged with the

education and government sectors, resulting in improved safety and overall

well-being.

These findings support the study of Mazerolle et al. (2013) that the role

of community policing in addressing crime and disorder and promoting

collaborative efforts with government agencies leads to enhanced safety and

satisfaction.

Residents in the religious sector expressed satisfaction with mobile

patrols (mean = 3.10), prompt responses to emergencies (mean = 2.67),

"standing and watching" posts (mean = 2.63), "beat patrol duties" (mean = 2.67),

and area visits (mean = 2.83). Lastly, in the youth sector, satisfaction levels

were noted for mobile patrols (mean = 2.87), emergency response (mean =
30

2.50), "standing and watching" posts (mean = 2.67), "beat patrol duties" (mean

= 2.57), and area visits (mean = 2.60). These imply that the satisfaction levels

in the religious sector indicate that the police are effectively addressing the

security needs of religious communities, fostering trust and a sense of safety.

However, in the youth sector, while generally positive, there may be room for

more focused engagement to better address the unique concerns of this

demographic.

Indeed, police personnel conduct mobile patrol in the community

because according to Leap et al. (2020), law enforcement agencies require a

sufficient number of personnel to assign patrol officers to manageable

geographic zones to maximize opportunities for involvement with the community

and law enforcement's main job is to stop criminals from breaking the law and

apprehend those who do.


31

Table 1. Present the level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community Policing Activities in terms
of Police Visibility.
BUSINESS SECTOR EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNMENT SECTOR RELIGIOUS SECTOR YOUTH SECTOR

STATEMENTS M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD

Police Visibility
1. Police personnel conducts
mobile patrol in the community. 2.97 0.718 Satisfied 3.10 0.712 Satisfied 3.03 0.556 Satisfied 3.10 0.803 Satisfied 2.87 0.730 Satisfied

2. PNP respond promptly to


emergency situation in our area. 2.60 0.814 Satisfied 2.53 0.730 Satisfied 2.57 0.626 Satisfied 2.67 0.802 Satisfied 2.50 0.938 Satisfied

3. PNP establishes a regular


“standing and watch” post in the
2.77 0.679 Satisfied 2.70 0.750 Satisfied 2.73 0.640 Satisfied 2.63 0.809 Satisfied 2.67 0.844 Satisfied
community for police visibility.

4. PNP conduct a “beat patrol


duties” in the local and national
road to monitor the pedestrians,
workers and other stakeholders
2.63 0.765 Satisfied 2.70 0.702 Satisfied 2.63 0.669 Satisfied 2.67 0.802 Satisfied 2.57 0.898 Satisfied
and to maintain friendly
relationship among its
community.

5. PNP conducts area visit to the


AOR to drive out potential
2.80 0.761 Satisfied 2.77 0.679 Satisfied 2.73 0.583 Satisfied 2.63 0.890 Satisfied 2.60 0.932 Satisfied
insurgents or gang groups.

OVERALL 2.76 0.747 Satisfied 2.76 0.715 Satisfied 2.74 0.615 Satisfied 2.74 0.821 Satisfied 2.64 0.868 Satisfied

Legend: 3.50-4.00 Highly Satisfied


2.50-3.49 Satisfied
1.50-2.49 Dissatisfied
1.00-1.49 Highly Dissatisfied
32

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community


Policing Activities in Terms of Police Community Relation

Table 2 presents the level of satisfaction of residents in terms of police

community relations on community policing activities, categorized by sector. The

study determined that the business sector is satisfied on community policing

activities in terms of police-community relations (mean = 2.72). This implies that

there is some degree of trust and cooperation, but there is room for improvement.

The findings attribute that the PNP participates in various local activities, such as

elections, inaugurations, community assemblies, fiestas, and seminars (mean =

3.30), interacts with local security forces (mean = 2.77), and participates in health-

related activities (mean = 2.63).

In contrast, in business sectors, they were dissatisfied that the PNP

addresses issues of racial bias and discrimination (Mean=2.30). This implies that

the legitimacy and credibility of law enforcers distort when they tolerate

discrimination and disregard respect for diversity and cultural differences in its

society. Promoting community-friendly policies may therefore require time and

careful consideration (The University of Kansas, 2023).

In the education sector, the study determined that the respondents were

satisfied on community policing activities in terms of police-community relations

(mean = 2.70). The finding attribute that PNP participates in various local activities,

such as elections, inaugurations, community assemblies, fiestas, and seminars

(mean = 3.07), interacts with local security forces (mean = 2.70), participates in
33

health-related activities (mean = 2.70), organizes community awareness (mean =

2.53), and addresses issues of racial bias and discrimination (mean = 2.50).

In the government sector, the study determined that the respondents were

satisfied on community policing activities in terms of police-community relations

(mean = 2.84). The finding attributes that PNP participates in various local activities,

such as elections, inaugurations, community assemblies, fiestas, and seminars

(mean = 3.27), interacts with local security forces (mean = 3.00), addresses issues

of racial bias and discrimination (mean = 2.67), participates in health-related

activities (mean = 2.63), and organizes local community awareness (mean = 2.63).

In religious sector, the study determined that the respondents were satisfied

on community policing activities in terms of police-community relations (mean =

3.26). The finding attributes that PNP interacts with local security forces (mean =

3.80), participates in health-related activities (mean = 3.67), organizes local

awareness in the community (mean = 3.33), and participates in various local

activities, such as elections, inaugurations, community assemblies, fiestas, and

seminars (mean = 3.23).

In contrast, in religious sector, they are dissatisfied on PNP efforts addressing

issues of racial bias and discrimination (Mean=2.27). This implies that law enforcers

efforts on ensuring public stability and security in solving religious conflict

discrimination among its different belief and tradition need to be improved.


34

Localized religious conflict has not yet been addressed as a significant focus

of community policing, despite being a key component of its policy (Kapoor et al.,

2022).

In the youth sector, the study determined that the respondents were satisfied

on community policing activities in terms of police-community relations (mean =

2.54). The finding attributed that the PNP participates in various local activities, such

as elections, inaugurations, community assemblies, fiestas, and seminars (mean =

3.13), participates in health-related activities (mean = 3.67), and interacts with local

security forces (mean = 2.63).

In contrast, residents show dissatisfaction with how PNP organizes local

awareness on community policing, which includes social media engagement,

cultural awareness training, and youth engagement programs (mean = 2.20), as well

as addressing racial bias and discrimination (mean = 2.07). This implies that the

PNP should improve its communication and engagement interventions using social

media platforms to protect citizens from discrimination.

As stated by Carter (2023), police departments must use community policing

as a method of law enforcement in an effort to improve relations between citizens,

particularly youths, and police officers.

Moreover, racial basis and discrimination remain unsolved issues that police

have to deal with because either the community as a whole or its residents as

individuals and groups gain from community-friendly policies, they need to work to

bind community ties and encourage positive development and growth (The
35

University of Kansas, 2023). Therefore, even though it is probable that some police

officers will stop and make arrests, it is possible that racial biases in the larger

society disadvantage minorities to the point where it results in these biased results,

leading to more minority suspects due to individual or departmental biases.


36

Table 2. Present the level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community Policing Activities in terms
of Police Community Relation.
EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNMENT
BUSINESS SECTOR RELIGIOUS SECTOR YOUTH SECTOR
SECTOR

STATEMENTS M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD

Police Community Relation

1. PNP participates to the local


activities, such as elections,
inauguration, community
assembly, fiesta, seminars and 3.30 0.750 Satisfied 3.07 0.688 Satisfied 3.27 0.868 Satisfied 3.23 0.971 Satisfied 3.13 1.008 Satisfied
among other important
activities.

2. PNP organizes local awareness


on community policing, such as
social media engagement, Dis-
2.60 0.498 Satisfied 2.53 0.730 Satisfied 2.63 0.718 Satisfied 3.33 0.844 Satisfied 2.20 0761.
cultural awareness training, satisfied
youth engagement program.

3. PNP interacts with other local


security forces like Philippine
Armed Forces, Barangay
Peacekeeping Action Teams
2.77 0.568 Satisfied 2.70 0.837 Satisfied 3.00 0.643 Satisfied 3.80 0.847 Satisfied 2.63 1.033 Satisfied
(BPATS), local councils, elders
and other community
organizations.

4. PNP participates and conducts


health related activities together
with the Rural Health 2.63 0.765 Satisfied 2.70 0.651 Satisfied 2.63 0.809 Satisfied 3.67 0.844 Satisfied 2.67 0.661 Satisfied
Unit/Department of Health.

5. PNP address issues of racial


Dis- Dis- Dis-
bias and discrimination. 2.30 0.702 2.50 0.572 Satisfied 2.67 0.661 Satisfied 2.27 0.740 2.07 0.583
satisfied satisfied satisfied
37
Table 2. Continued…

OVERALL 2.72 0.656 Satisfied 2.70 0.696 Satisfied 2.84 0.740 Satisfied 3.26 0.850 Satisfied 2.54 0.809 Satisfied

Legend: 3.50-4.00 Highly Satisfied


2.50-3.49 Satisfied
1.50-2.49 Dissatisfied
1.00-1.49 Highly Dissatisfied
38

Level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community


Policing Activities in Terms of Police Checkpoint

Table 2.1 presents the level of satisfaction of residents on community policing

activities in terms of police checkpoints, categorized by sector. The results revealed

that the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato are generally satisfied on PNP efforts

in manning a checkpoint to ensure compliance with regulations. This implies that

different sectors appreciate law enforcement's efforts to maintain order and security

through checkpoint operations while also respecting residents' rights and

maintaining a professional and courteous approach. The finding attributes the

respondents’ satisfaction that, in the business sector, they are contented with the

regularity of police checkpoint operations (mean = 3.27) and the practice of police

personnel explaining the purpose of the checkpoint (mean = 2.80). Notably, they

express satisfaction with the fact that law enforcement officers do not force motorists

to open their vehicle trunks or compartments (mean = 2.53) and use courteous

language when communicating with motorists (mean = 2.87). Furthermore,

residents in the business sector appreciate that during checkpoints, police personnel

refrain from imposing fines, extorting, or harassing drivers, passengers, and traders

(mean = 2.63).

This finding affirms the study of Gagnon and Fox (2021) that the police have

been responsible for maintaining order, including the authorization to use physical

force if necessary.
39

In the education sector, respondents express satisfaction on the regularity of

checkpoints conducted by the police (Mean=3.07) and the practice of explaining the

purpose of these checkpoints (Mean=2.53). Moreover, they appreciate that police

personnel do not force motorists to open their vehicle trunks or compartments

(Mean=2.57) and use courteous language during interactions (Mean=2.70). The

data also reveal satisfaction with the police refraining from imposing fines, extorting,

or harassing individuals during checkpoints (Mean=2.50).

Within the government sector, residents express a notably high level of

satisfaction with police checkpoint operations. They appreciate the regularity of

these checkpoints (Mean=3.27) and the practice of police personnel explaining the

purpose behind them (Mean=2.77). Furthermore, they are contented with the fact

that police officers do not force motorists to open their vehicle trunks or

compartments (Mean=2.93) and employ courteous language when speaking to

motorists (Mean=3.07). The data also highlight satisfaction with the police refraining

from imposing fines, extorting, or harassing drivers, passengers, and traders during

checkpoints (Mean=3.03).

In the religious sector, residents' express contentment with the regularity of

checkpoint operations conducted by police personnel (Mean=2.90) and the practice

of explaining the purpose of these checkpoints (Mean=2.57). They are also pleased

with the fact that police officers do not force motorists to open their vehicle trunks or

compartments (Mean=2.60) and use courteous language during interactions

(Mean=2.87). Additionally, residents in the religious sector appreciate that the police
40

do not impose fines, extort, or harass drivers, passengers, or traders during

checkpoints (Mean=2.60). These findings imply that residents in the religious sector

have a moderately positive perception on police checkpoint operations and

interactions.

Hence, people who think favorably of the police are less likely to feel unsafe,

more likely to cooperate with law enforcement, and less likely to commit crimes

themselves (Tyler, 2003). Therefore, the ability to speak clearly, concisely, and with

assurance is a requirement for police officers especially whether or not they are

talking with a citizen.

In youth sector, it was revealed that the youth displays varying levels of

satisfaction with police checkpoint operations. While they express satisfaction with

the regularity of checkpoints (Mean=3.10), they are less satisfied with the practice

of explaining the purpose of these checkpoints (Mean=2.80). Notably, occasionally

use less courteous language during interactions (Mean=2.90). However, they

appreciate that the police do not impose fines, extort, or harass drivers, passengers,

or traders during checkpoints (Mean=2.63). These findings imply that the youth

sector exhibits varying levels of satisfaction with police checkpoint operations and

interactions. While they acknowledge the importance of regular checkpoints, there

is an opportunity to enhance communication and courtesy during interactions. The

community values the ethical conduct of law enforcement during checkpoints which

is essential for building trust and maintaining security and order in the area.
41

Meanwhile, residents show dissatisfaction with the ability of PNP to conduct

checks on motorist vehicles (Mean = 2.43). This implies that PNPs abuse their power

by providing fair and consistent treatment in respecting the rights and dignity of

motorists.

According to the study of Sato (2017), by meeting the public's reasonable

expectations of them, the police must gain the public's trust. People are more likely

to place their trust in the police if they feel it will enable them to access the services

they require.
42

Table 2.1 Present the level of Satisfaction of the Residents of Poblacion, Pikit on Community Policing Activities in

terms of Police Checkpoint.

EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNMENT


BUSINESS SECTOR RELIGIOUS SECTOR YOUTH SECTOR
SECTOR

STATEMENTS M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD

Police Checkpoint
1. PNP Personnel Conduct
checkpoints regularly. 3.27 0.691 Satisfied 3.07 0.521 Satisfied 3.23 0.504 Satisfied 2.90 0.845 Satisfied 3.10 0.607 Satisfied

2. During police checkpoint, PNP


always explain the purpose of
2.80 0.761 Satisfied 2.53 0.860 Satisfied 2.77 0.568 Satisfied 2.57 0.817 Satisfied 2.80 0.805 Satisfied
the checkpoint.

3. During police checkpoint, PNP


personnel does not force
Dis-
motorist to open their vehicles 2.53 0.900 Satisfied 2.70 1.006 Satisfied 2.93 0.521 Satisfied 2.60 0.855 Satisfied 2.43 0.858
satisfied
trunk or compartment.

4. During police checkpoint, PNP


uses courteous language when
2.87 1.008 Satisfied 2.70 0.915 Satisfied 3.07 0.691 Satisfied 2.87 0.937 Satisfied 2.90 1.029 Satisfied
speaking to motorist.

5. During checkpoint, PNP


personnel does not fine, extort,
2.63 0.765 Satisfied 2.50 0.682 Satisfied 3.03 0.414 Satisfied 2.60 0.814 Satisfied 2.63 0.850 Satisfied
or harass drivers, passengers,
traders.
OVERALL 2.82 0.825 Satisfied 2.7 0.796 Satisfied 3.006 0.539 Satisfied 2.71 0.854 Satisfied 2.77 0.830 Satisfied

Legend: 3.50-4.00 Highly Satisfied


2.50-3.49 Satisfied
1.50-2.49 Dissatisfied
1.00-1.49 Highly Dissatisfied
43

The Level of Trust of Sectoral Groups in the Police Officers

Table 3 discusses the level of trust residents felt according to sectoral

groups that include business, education, government, religious, and youth

sectors.

The results revealed that the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato have

measured trust in the police officers (mean = 2.27). This implies that there is a

need to improve the relationship between the police and the community.

Building trust and positive communication channels should be a priority. The

finding is attributed to the respondents’ level of trust that in business sector,

residents express dissatisfaction with the Philippine National Police's ability to

control social disorder, particularly concerning unwanted leisure activities,

liquor-related issues, noise disturbances, and loitering (Mean=1.97), believe

that due to PNP monitoring and interaction, crimes are lowered or eliminated

(Mean=2.03), residents are able to establish business due to peace and order

(Mean= 2.10), residents are confidently leaving their home/house without any

fear of any kind crimes activities like robbery, theft, and trespassing

(Mean=2.13), feel comfortable approaching police officers in our community

with my concerns (Mean=2.23), PNP enforces fair and with no bias interactions

among the residents (Mean=2.23), residents are able to walk with peace and

security due to PNP visibility in the community(Mean=2.33) and residents

believed that the police personnel are responsive to the community concerns

and issues(Mean=2.37).
44

According to the study of Warren (2019), the Philippine National Police

(PNP) plays a crucial role in fostering community safety and business

prosperity. Its assertion that a trusting relationship with the police is closely

linked to residents' willingness to engage in business ventures and their sense

of security within the community.

In contrast, the respondents were satisfied to the extent that the residents

follow the posed curfew hours or schedules set by the local authorities or police

authorities (mean = 2.70), and the Philippine National Police exhibits good

manners during any kind of encounter with the residents, especially in capturing

community offenders (mean = 2.63).

The foregoing results indicate that the police's good manners can help

build trust and confidence in their interactions with the community and the

satisfaction with curfew enforcement suggests a strong partnership with local

authorities, and this collaboration is essential for maintaining order and safety

in the community.

These findings affirm the study conducted by Crisp (2017) asserting that

respectful and considerate interactions with residents during law enforcement

activities foster a sense of trust and cooperation within the community.

Furthermore, the finding is attributed to the respondents’ level of trust

that in education sector, residents express dissatisfaction with the residents are

confidently leaving their home/house without any fear of any kind crimes

activities like robbery, theft, and trespassing (Mean=2.07), residents are able to
45

walk with peace and security due to PNP visibility in the community

(Mean=2.17), residents are able to establish business due to peace and order

(Mean= 2.17), residents believe that due to PNP monitoring and interaction,

crimes are lowered or eliminated (Mean=2.20), PNP's ability to control social

disorder, particularly concerning unwanted leisure activities, liquor-related

issues, noise disturbances, and loitering (Mean=2.27), PNP enforces fair and

with no bias interactions among the residents (Mean=2.27) and residents

believed that the police personnel are responsive to the community concerns

and issues (Mean=2.43).

Another idea of Comrie (2019) manifests in this result. According to him,

that trust in law enforcement plays a central role in creating a secure

environment that allows residents to confidently leave their homes and engage

in various activities without fear of crime.

In contrast, the respondents are satisfied that the residents follow the

posed curfew hours or scheduled set by the local authorities nor police

authorities (Mean=2.77), Philippine National Police exhibits good manners

during any kind of encounters with the residents especially in capturing

community offenders (Mean= 2.73) and residents feel comfortable approaching

police officers in our community with my concerns (Mean=2.70).

The foregoing results indicate the positive community-police relations,

good manners displayed by the police, compliance with curfew hours, and

residents feeling comfortable approaching law enforcement.


46

These findings affirm the study of Jackson et al. (2012) that the

demeanor of the Philippine National Police (PNP) is closely tied to the trust and

comfort experienced by community members. A respectful and professional

approach by the police, especially in capturing community offenders, enhances

residents' trust in law enforcement and fosters a cooperative atmosphere within

the community.

Moreover, in the government sector, the results revealed that the

government sector has moderate trust to police officers (mean = 2.54). This

implies that the residents have an average sense of confidence in the local

police officers. The finding attributed the respondents’ level of trust that in

government sector, residents express satisfaction with the PNP's ability to

control social disorder, particularly concerning unwanted leisure activities,

liquor-related issues, noise disturbances, and loitering (Mean=3.00), residents

follow the posed curfew hours or scheduled set by the local authorities nor police

authorities (Mean=2.90), residents believed that the police personnel are

responsive to the community concerns and issues(Mean=2.80), PNP exhibits

good manners during any kind of encounters with the residents especially in

capturing community offenders (Mean= 2.67), residents feel comfortable

approaching police officers in our community with my concerns (Mean=2.66)

and PNP enforces fair and with no bias interactions among the residents

(Mean=2.57).
47

According to Weisburd, et al. (2010), the pivotal role of trust in

government and law enforcement agencies in establishing a secure

environment and fostering community cooperation.

In contrast, the respondents in the government sector were dissatisfied

that the residents are confidently leaving their home or house without any fear

of any kind of crime activity like robbery, theft, or trespassing (mean = 2.13);

residents believe that due to PNP monitoring and interaction, crimes are

lowered or eliminated (mean = 2.13); residents are able to establish businesses

due to peace and order (mean = 2.23); and residents are able to walk with peace

and security due to PNP visibility in the community (mean = 2.33).

The foregoing results indicate that residents may still feel unsafe and

may not trust the police in providing a secure environment. A lack of trust in

crime reduction efforts can contribute to ongoing crime problems, hinder

economic development in the community, and impact residents' overall well-

being and feelings of security.

The findings affirm the study of Emsley (2013) that trust in law

enforcement is intricately linked to residents' sense of security, and addressing

these safety concerns is essential to foster greater confidence among the

residents.

In religious sector, the finding is attributed to the respondents’ level of

trust that in religious sector, residents express dissatisfaction with the PNP's

ability to control social disorder, particularly concerning unwanted leisure


48

activities, liquor-related issues, noise disturbances, and loitering (Mean=2.07),

residents believe that due to PNP monitoring and interaction, crimes are

lowered or eliminated (Mean=2.07), ), residents are able to establish business

due to peace and order (Mean= 2.10), residents are confidently leaving their

home/house without any fear of any kind crimes activities like robbery, theft, and

trespassing (Mean=2.17), PNP enforces fair and with no bias interactions

among the residents (Mean=2.20), residents are able to walk with peace and

security due to PNP visibility in the community (Mean=2.23), residents believed

that the police personnel are responsive to the community concerns and issues

(Mean=2.30), and, residents feel comfortable approaching police officers in our

community with my concerns (Mean=2.37).

According to Gill et al. (2017), the importance of aligning law enforcement

efforts with community needs, fostering a sense of security, and ensuring

responsive and fair interactions to build and maintain residents' trust within the

community is necessary.

In contrast, the respondents were satisfied that the residents follow the

posed curfew hours or schedules set by the local authorities and police

authorities (mean = 2.90), and the Philippine National Police exhibits good

manners during any kind of encounter with the residents, especially in capturing

community offenders (mean = 2.73).

According to Auguis et al. (2018), PNP is effective at upholding the law,

preserving public order, fostering positive relationships within the community,


49

and guaranteeing people feel safe. This statement states that curfew

enforcement provided a good reason to stop and speak with someone who

appeared to be underage and unsupervised by an adult.

In youth sector, the finding is attributed to the respondents’ level of trust,

that in youth sector, residents express dissatisfaction as they believe that due

to PNP monitoring and interaction, crimes are lowered or eliminated

(Mean=2.00), residents are confidently leaving their home/house without any

fear of any kind crimes activities like robbery, theft, and trespassing

(Mean=2.03), PNP's ability to control social disorder, particularly concerning

unwanted leisure activities, liquor-related issues, noise disturbances, and

loitering (Mean=2.10), residents are able to establish business due to peace

and order (Mean= 2.13), PNP enforces fair and with no bias interactions among

the residents (Mean=2.27), residents believed that the police personnel are

responsive to the community concerns and issues(Mean=2.27), residents are

able to walk with peace and security due to PNP visibility in the community

(Mean=2.40), residents feel comfortable approaching police officers in our

community with my concerns (Mean=2.47).

The public must be satisfied with the police in order for them to earn their

trust. People are more likely to place their trust in the police if they feel it will

enable them to access the services they require. However, placing their trust in

anyone comes with its own set of risks and benefits (Sato, 2017). This indicates

that Police must treat people with respect and sensitivity in order to develop the
50

trust necessary for a successful community partnership. Arrogance, aloofness,

or rudeness at any level of the agency, as well as the use of unnecessary force,

will reduce the community's willingness to support the police.

In contrast, the respondents were satisfied that the residents follow the

curfew hours or schedules set by the local authorities and police authorities

(mean = 3.00) and that the Philippine National Police exhibits good manners

during any kind of encounter with the residents, especially in capturing

community offenders (mean = 2.53).

Another idea of Braga et al. (2012) highlights that when law enforcement

addresses the concerns of the youth sector, it can foster a sense of cooperation

and trust, leading to improved community relations and compliance with

regulations.
51

Table 3. The Level of Trust of Sectoral Groups to the Police Officers.


EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNMENT
BUSINESS SECTOR RELIGIOUS SECTOR YOUTH SECTOR
SECTOR

STATEMENTS M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD M SD QD

Level of Trust:
1. I believed that the police
personnel are responsive to the
Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
community concerns and 2.37 0.615 2.43 0.626 2.80 0.664 Satisfied 2.30 0.702 2.27 0.583
satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
issues.

2. Philippine National Police


exhibits good manners during
any kind of encounters with the Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.63 0.928 Satisfied 2.73 0.679 2.67 0.884 Satisfied 2.67 0.959 2.53 1.008
residents especially in capturing satisfied satisfied satisfied
community offenders.

3. PNP enforces fair and with no


bias interactions among the Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.23 0.774 2.27 0.907 2.57 0.858 Satisfied 2.20 0.805 2.27 0.828
residents. satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied

4. PNP are able to control the


Social Disorder (unwanted
leisure), such as liquor drinking Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
1.97 0.765 2.27 0.740 3.00 0.643 Satisfied 2.07 0.828 2.10 0.750
issues, noises, loitering and satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
other type of disturbance.

5. Residents are able to establish


business due to peace and Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.10 0.662 2.17 0.791 2.23 0.626 2.10 0.662 2.13 0.629
order. satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied

6. Residents follow the posed


curfew hours or scheduled set
by the local authorities nor
2.70 0.837 Satisfied 2.77 0.679 Satisfied 2.90 0.712 Satisfied 2.90 0.845 Satisfied 3.00 0.525 Satisfied
police authorities.
52

Table 3. Continued…
7. Residents are confidently
leaving their home/house without
0.629
any fear of any kind crimes Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.13 0.681 2.07 0.640 2.13 2.17 0.791 2.03 0.765
activities like robbery, theft, and satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
trespassing.

8. Residents believe that due to


PNP monitoring and interaction,
Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
crimes are lowered or 2.03 0.669 2.20 0.761 2.13 0.681 2.07 0.640 2.00 0.643
satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
eliminated.

9. Residents are able to walk with


peace and security due to PNP Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.33 1.269 2.17 0.791 2.33 0.711 2.23 0.774 2.40 1.276
visibility in the community. satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied

10. I feel comfortable approaching


police officers in our community Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-
2.23 0.774 2.70 0.877 2.66 0.814 2.37 0.850 2.47 0.776
with my concerns. satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied

Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis-


OVERALL 2.27 0.797 2.38 0.749 2.54 0.722 Satisfied 2.31 0.786 2.32 0.778
satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied

Legend: 3.50-4.00 Highly Satisfied


2.50-3.49 Satisfied
1.50-2.49 Dissatisfied
1.00-1.49 Highly Dissatisfied
53

The Significant Difference Between the Level of Satisfaction of Residents


according to Sectoral Classification

Table 3.1 shows the significant difference between the level of

satisfaction of residents according to sectoral classification.

The p-values of police visibility, police-community relation, police

checkpoint, and level of trust obtained 0.897, 0.103, 0.057, and 0.131,

respectively, indicating that the hypothesis was accepted and not significant.

These findings also accept the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no

significant difference in the level of satisfaction of the residents when analyzed

according to their sectoral classification.

This also indicates that the results of the findings clearly stated the

concept that residents might be experiencing in terms of sectoral classification

(business, education, government, religion, and youth) and does not have an

impact and ability to measure the level of trust they formulate towards the PNP

in terms of police visibility, police-community relation, police checkpoint, and

level of trust.

As further discussed by The University of Kansas (2023), they argued

that either the community as a whole or its residents as individuals and groups

gain from community-friendly policies., and that the police chief and officers

must collaborate to promote good police-community relations if local law

enforcement is to operate more effectively and efficiently. The primary objective

of the first core element of community policing is to establish and uphold mutual
54

trust. The key difference is that in community policing, the police becomes an

integral part of the local culture and collaborate with the locals to determine

future priorities and resource allocation.

Table 3.1. presents the significant difference between the level of satisfaction of
residents according to sectoral classification.

Factors Kruskal-Wallis p-value


Police Visibility 1.08 0.897ns

Police Community Relation 7.71 0.103ns

Police Checkpoint 9.17 0.057ns

Level of Trust 7.09 0.131ns

**-significant at 0.05%; ns- not significant


55

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the major findings of the study, the conclusion

drawn based on the results of the data gathered and the recommendations

presented in relation to the objectives.

This study is entitled “Sectoral Satisfaction on Community Policing

Activities in Pikit, Cotababto”. This study aimed to: (1) determine the level of

satisfaction of the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, on Community Policing

Activities; (2) determine the level of trust of sectoral groups to the police officers;

and, (3) determine the significant difference in the level of satisfaction of the

residents when analyzed according to their sectoral classification. A survey

questionnaire was used to gather the data. The data were tallied and interpreted

using statistical tools such as weighted mean and standard deviation.

Based on the results of the study, a summary of findings was presented:

The study revealed that the majority of residents are satisfied in terms of police

visibility, police-community relations, and police checkpoints with community

policing activities according to their sector classification. In terms of level of trust,

only the government sectors feel that the police can effectively address

community concerns and issues, while the majority of residents in sectoral

groups in business, education, religion, and youth are not satisfied. Additionally,

sectoral groups in business, education, government, religious, and youth are

satisfied that PNP associate ethics and good manners. Contrarily, sectoral
56

groups in business, education, government, religion, and youth are happy that

the police are in charge and make sure that residents follow set curfew and

adhere to the rules so that they can be heard during midnight for disturbance

and noise. Lastly, there is no significant difference in the level of satisfaction of

the residents when analyzed according to their sectoral classification.

The study concluded that the residents of Poblacion, Pikit, Cotabato are

satisfied on community policing activities such as police personnel conducting

mobile patrols in the community. They are also satisfied that PNP participates

in various local activities, and PNP conducts checkpoint regularly. In contrast,

the respondents were dissatisfied on PNP’s effort on addressing issues of racial

and discrimination and believe that PNP personnel does not force motorist to

open their vehicles trunk or compartment. Moreover, the respondents were

dissatisfied on police officers in terms of controlling social disorder, and believe

that due to PNP monitoring and interaction, crimes are lowered or eliminated,

and confidently leaving their home/house without any fear of any kind crimes

activities.

Moreover, the study concluded that there is no significant difference in

the level of satisfaction of the residents when analyzed according to their

sectoral classification.

The recommendations presented are drawn to address the research

problems:
57

The local police must prioritize addressing racial and discrimination

concerns within the community by implementing measures such as diversity

training for officers and facilitating open dialogues. Building trust between

residents and the police is essential, requiring increased community outreach

and involvement in decision-making processes. To improve safety perceptions,

the police should focus on visible patrols, crime prevention programs, and

effective communication with residents. Proactive community engagement and

education initiatives are crucial to inform residents about the police's role and

foster collaboration for community safety. Establishing a structured feedback

system allows residents to express concerns, enabling the police to make real-

time adjustments and demonstrate responsiveness. Additionally, implementing

data-driven policing strategies enhances overall community safety by targeting

crime hotspots and allocating resources more effectively.


59

LITERATURE CITED

Alpert, G. P., Dunham, R. G., Stroshine, M., Bennett, K., & MacDonald, J.
(2006). Assessing police officers' decision making and discretion in
making traffic stops in Savannah, Georgia, 2002. ICPSR Data
Holdings. https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr04340

Auguis, M., Labastida, M., Lacaba, J., Pejoles, R. C., Pelegrino, R. & Tampan,
I. S. (2018). Community Satisfaction of Philippine National Police
Services: Basis for Development Program. SMCC Higher Education
Research Journal (Criminal Justice), 1(1).

Blair, G., Weinstein, J. M., Christia, F., Arias, E., Badran, E., Blair, R. A.,
Cheema, A., Farooqui, A., Fetzer, T., Grossman, G., Haim, D.,
Hameed, Z., Hanson, R., Hasanain, A., Kronick, D., Morse, B. S.,
Muggah, R., Nadeem, F., Tsai, L. L., … Wilke, A. M. (2021). Community
policing does not build citizen trust in police or reduce crime in the Global
South. Science, 374(6571). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3446

Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2012). The Effects of Hot
Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 633–663.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.673632

Carter, J. (2023). Community policing. Apex Officer - Virtual Reality Police


Training Simulator. https://www.apexofficer.com/resources/community-
policing

Comrie, N. A. (2019), October 7). Using community policing in schools to


prevent and respond to bullying and intolerance. StopBullying.gov.
https://www.stopbullying.gov/blog/2016/05/10/using-community-
policing-schools-prevent-and-respond-bullying-and-intolerance

Crisp, A. (2017). Police community support officers in the United Kingdom.


Police Reserves and Volunteers, 215-230.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315367460-19

Emsley, C. (2013). Patrolmen, detectives, and policing by the community. A


Short History of Police and Policing, 103-132.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844600.003.0006
59

Ford, S. A. (2020). The Effect of Community Policing Models on Officer Job


Satisfaction. https://search.proquest.com/openview/3a64fa212ec2ec
490230de87a2eccac6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y

Gagnon, A., & Fox, K. A. (2021). Community satisfaction and police officer
understanding of community expectations: A quantitative and
observational analysis.
CrimRxiv.https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.8bbf6244

Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2017).
PROTOCOL: Community‐oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder,
and fear and improve legitimacy and satisfaction with police: a systematic
review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–30.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.174

Gross, B., & Gavin, S. M. (2020). Public discourse and the nature of community
policing. Framing the Police on Twitter, 55-71.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224440-4

Hwang, E., McGarrell, E. F., & Benson, B. L. (2005). Public satisfaction with the
South Korean police: The effect of residential location in a rapidly
industrializing nation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 585-
599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.08.007

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P. M., & Tyler, T. R.
(2012). Why do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the
Influence of Legal Institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6),
1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032

Joaquin, R. M. J. (2005). Police community relations and effectiveness of PNP,


Ilocos Norte Thesis (M.Pub.Adm.) -University of Northern Philippines,
Vigan City, Ilocos Norte.

Kapoor, V., Flavin, W., Orchs, P., Matyok, T., &Fahim, E (2022). Community
policing solutions for religion-on-religion conflict: Lessons from an
Indian case study. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040047

Kasali, M. A., & Odetola, R. G. (2016). Alternative Approach to Policing in


Nigeria: Analyzing the Need to Redefine Community Policing in
Tackling the Nation's Security Challenges. African Journal of
Criminology and Justice Studies, 9(1)
60

Latog, Reggie L. (2004), Performance Level of Policewomen in Tagum City.


College of Criminology. Cagayan de Oro College.
Leap, J., Brantingham, P.J., Franke, T., & Bonis, S. (2020). Evaluation of the
LAPD community safety partnership. UCLA Luskin.
http://www.lapdpolicecom.lacity.org/051220/CSP%20Evaluation%
20Report_2020_FINAL.pdf

Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen
Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of
Procedural Justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x

Morgan, A. (2011), Police and crime prevention: Partnering with the


community. Australian Institute of Criminology.
Mourtgos, S., Mayer, R. C., & Wise, R. (2017). Police-community trust: The
overlooked perspective of police trust in the public. Academy of
Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 14126.
https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.14126abstract
Novak, K. J., Alarid, L. F., & Lucas, W. L. (2003). Exploring officers'
acceptance of community policing: Implications for policy
implementation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 57-
71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00199-X

Padilla, K. E., Tom, K. E., & Fine, A. D. (2023). Accepting the Challenge:
Understanding Police Officers’ Perceptions of a Community-Based,
Youth Empowerment Program, Justice Evaluation Journal, 6:1, 1-
19, DOI: 10.1080/24751979.2022.2052344
https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2022.2052344

Police Community Relations Manual (Revised). PNPM-DPCR-DS-7-01-12.


2012

Sato, M. (2017). Police legitimacy and public cooperation. Police–Citizen


Relations Across the World, 108-126.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315406664-5
Sombroi, P. H., & Branca, J. A. (2018). Level of Performance of Police
Community Relation of Trece Martires City Component Police Station
against Crime and Criminality. International Journal of Scientific
Engineering and Research (IJSER), 6(12).
https://www.ijser.in/archives/v6i12/IJSER18428.pdf
61

Terpstra, J., & Salet, R. (2019). The contested community police officer: An
ongoing conflict between different institutional logics. International
Journal of Police Science & Management, 21(4), 244–253. Retrieved
on April 14, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355719889465

The University of Kansas. (2023). Chapter 25. Changing policies | Section 6.


Promoting community-friendly policies in business and Goverment |
Main section | Community tool box. Community Tool Box.
https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of- contents/implement/changing-
policies/business-government-community- friendly/main

Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of


Law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147701

Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public
Cooperation with the Police and The Courts. New York: Rusell Sage
Foundation. Layla Skinns.

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice,


social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203782842

Waldschmidt, R. (2018). Fairness in Law Enforcement. FBI Law Enforcement


Bulletin, United States Department of Justice.

Warren (2019). Police community support officer culture in a pluralized Field.


Police Community Support Officers, 123-135.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803676.003.0006

Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Hinkle, J. C., & Eck, J. E. (2015). Is Problem-
Oriented Policing Effective in Reducing Crime and Disorder? Findings
from a Campbell Systematic Review. Social Science Research Network.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2632671_code2377
032.pdf?abstractid=2632671&mirid=1

Yuksel, Y., & Tepe, F. (2013). Citizen satisfaction with police and community
policing. European scientific journal, 9(14).
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n14p%25p
APPENDICES
60
64
65
66
66
68

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO


Kabacan, Cotabato
Philippines

INFORMED CONSENT
RESEARCH PAPER TITLE: SECTORAL SATISFACTION ON COMMUNITY POLICING
ACTIVITIES IN PIKIT, COTABATO

Thank you so much for agreeing to participate in this study. This consent is purposely
designed to keep you informed of the matter of the study.

Research Objectives

This study generally aims to determine the level of satisfaction of the residents of
Poblacion, Pikit on Community Policing Activities. Specifically, it aims to:

1. determine the level of satisfaction of the residents of Poblacion, Pikit on


Community Policing Activities;
2. determine the level of trust of sectoral groups to the police officers; and
3. determine the significant difference on the level of satisfaction of the
residents when analyzed according to their sectoral classification.

The survey will take about 10-15 minutes. I highly assure to the best of my ability that
no risk is associated with your participation in this research. You have the right to withdraw
participation from the study in case you feel uncomfortable.

To follow research ethics, I would like you to read the following statements below and
check (√) those that you agree with. This will help me prove that you understand the purpose
of your participation and that you agree with the research conditions.

YNO STATEMENTS

ES 1. I understand that I have voluntarily participated in this study, and


that I have the right to withdraw from the research study at any
time.
2. I understand that I can use a false name.

3. I understand that I can request the researcher to translate


statements in my own language whenever I don’t understand
them.
69
68

4. I understand that the data to be collected will be tabulated and


presented to the research audience.
5. I understand the researcher request me to participate again in the
study for validation, especially if an error in data analysis arises.
6. I understand that researcher will ensure that my profile will be
kept anonymously to anyone.
7. I understand that affixing my signature below expresses my
deliberate agreement to participate in the study.

____________________________
RESPONDENT’S SIGNATURE

__________________
Date
70
68

Appendix G. Survey Questionnaire

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO


Kabacan, Cotabato
Philippines
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTORAL SATISFACTION ON COMMUNITY POLICING ACTIVITIES IN
PIKIT, COTABATO

I. Level of Satisfaction on Community Policing Activities.

Direction: Rate the following statements based on how satisfied you are on this

situation. Check the number that best corresponds to your answer.

4. Highly Satisfied

3. Satisfied

2. Dissatisfied

1. Highly Dissatisfied

Set. A

Police Visibility 4 3 2 1

1. Police personnel conducts mobile patrol in the


community.
2. PNP respond promptly to emergency situation
in our area.
3. PNP establishes a regular “standing and
watch” post in the community for police visibility.
4. PNP conduct a “beat patrol duties” in the local
and national road to monitor the pedestrians,
workers and other stakeholders and to maintain
friendly relationship among its community.
71
68

5. PNP conducts area visit to the AOR to drive


out potential insurgents or gang groups.

Police Community Relation 4 3 2 1

1. PNP participates to the local activities, such as


elections, inauguration, community assembly,
fiesta, seminars and among other important
activities.
2. PNP organizes local awareness on community
policing, such as social media engagement,
cultural awareness training, youth engagement
program.
3. PNP interacts with other local security forces
like Philippine Armed Forces, Barangay
Peacekeeping Action Teams (BPATS), local
councils, elders and other community
organizations.
4. PNP participates and conducts health related
activities together with the Rural Health
Unit/Department of Health.
5. PNP address issues of racial bias and
discrimination.

Police Checkpoint 4 3 2 1

1. PNP Personnel Conduct checkpoints


regularly.

2. During police checkpoint, PNP always explain


the purpose of the checkpoint.
72
68

3. During police checkpoint, PNP personnel


does not force motorist to open their vehicles
trunk or compartment.
4. During police checkpoint, PNP uses
courteous language when speaking to motorist.

5. During checkpoint, PNP personnel does not


fine, extort, or harass drivers, passengers,
traders.

Instruction: Check the number that best corresponds to your answer.


4. Highly Satisfied
3. Satisfied
2. Dissatisfied
1. Highly Dissatisfied

Set. B
Level of Trust 4 3 2 1
1. I believed that the police personnel are
responsive to the community concerns and
issues.
2. Philippine National Police exhibits good
manners during any kind of encounters with the
residents especially in capturing community
offenders.
3. PNP enforces fair and with no bias interactions
among the residents.
4. PNP were able to control the Social Disorder
(unwanted leisure), such as liquor drinking
73
68

issues, noises, loitering and other type of


disturbance.
5. Residents are able to establish business due
to peace and order.
6. Residents follow the posed curfew hours or
scheduled set by the local authorities or police
authorities.
7. Residents are confidently leaving their
home/house without any fear of any kind of
crimes activities like robbery, theft, and
trespassing.
8. Residents believe that due to PNP monitoring
and interaction, crimes are lowered or eliminated.
9. Residents are able to walk with peace and
security due to PNP visibility in the community.
10. I feel comfortable approaching police officers
in our community with my concerns.
(Source: Adapted questionnaires were formulated based on the 2012 Revised
Police Community Relations Manual)
68
68
68
77

CURRICULUM VITAE
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO
Kabacan, Cotabato
Philippines

CURRICULUM VITAE

BUHARI G. KAMID
Address: Paidu Pulangi, Pikit, Cotababto
Contact #: 09355518062
Email: bgkamid@usm.edu.ph

PERSONAL INFORMATION
Last Name KAMID
First Name BUHARI
Middle Name GUIAPLOS
Nickname BOH
Age 25
Nationality FILIPINO
Religion ISLAM
Civil Status SINGLE
Father’s Name EDDIE I. KAMID
Mother’s Name NORHATA G. KAMID
Educational Background

DATU BITOL MANGANSAKAN


Elementary
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DATU BITOL MANGANSAKAN


Junior High School MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL

Senior High School SILIK HIGH SCHOOL


UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
Tertiary MINDANAO
76

You might also like