Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparing Provincial Marginal Tax Rates For Middle Income Earners
Comparing Provincial Marginal Tax Rates For Middle Income Earners
7.70
8
0
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL
Notes:
(1) Personal income tax rates include surtaxes where applicable. Quebec’s tax rate is adjusted for the federal abatement.
(2) The maket income in 2022 was forecast based on the market income of individuals in 2019 expressed in 2022 constant
dollars. Inflation values for 2022 were claculated based on the average of private forecasters and the Bank of Canada’s
projections.
Sources: CRA (2022); Revenu Quebec (2022); Statistics Canada (2022a, 2022b, 2022c); calculations by authors.
This section compares the provincial marginal The lowest marginal tax for those earning the
tax rate facing individuals across Canada earn- national average market income is in British
ing the national average market income.3 In Columbia at 7.70 percent. The highest rate is in
2022, the national average market income is Quebec at 16.62 percent. There is a clear divi-
$52,750.4 sion between provinces east of the Ontario-
Quebec border and those to the west. Amongst
3
The provinces differ in their average incomes. In the western provinces and Ontario, the mar-
this study we use the national average income for ginal provincial rate at the national average in-
our analysis. For simplicity, we abbreviate this to come level ranged from 7.70 to 12.75 percent. In
“average income earner,” by which we refer to an Quebec and Atlantic Canada marginal rates are
earner at the national average rather than the aver-
higher, ranging from 13.80 percent in Prince
age in any specific province.
Edward Island to 16.62 percent in Quebec.
4
The market income for 2022 was forecast based on
the market income for families and unattached indi- Table 1 presents the marginal provincial tax
viduals in 2019 expressed in 2022 constant dollars. rates at various levels of income, including
Table 1: Provincial Marginal Tax Rates1 at National Average Market Income and
Various Income Levels, 2022
Marginal tax rate (%) Marginal tax Marginal tax Marginal tax
at average market rate (%) at rate (%) at rate (%) at
income ($52,750) $60,000 $80,000 $100,000
British Columbia 7.70 7.70 7.70 12.29
Alberta 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Saskatchewan 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.50
Manitoba 12.75 12.75 17.40 17.40
Ontario 9.15 9.15 9.15 17.41
Quebec2 16.62 16.62 16.62 20.62
New Brunswick 14.82 14.82 14.82 16.52
Nova Scotia 14.95 16.67 16.67 17.50
Prince Edward Island 13.80 13.80 16.70 16.70
Newfoundland & Labrador 14.50 14.50 15.80 15.80
Notes:
(1) Personal income tax rates include surtaxes where applicable.
(2) For comparability, the Quebec tax rates are adjusted downwards due to the federal abatement. The federal abatement
results in Quebecers paying less in federal taxes than other provinces. A direct comparison between statutory provincial
rates, without adjusting for the abatement, can be misleading in terms of judging the differences in tax rates paid in Que-
bec versus other provinces.
$60,000, the national average income level age income.5 At the average income, individu-
($52,750), $80,000, and $100,000. Table 1 shows als face a federal marginal rate of 20.5 percent.
that for most middle-income levels, the general This means that for Albertans, British Columbi-
rule of lower marginal rates west of the Ontar- ans, and Ontarians, the marginal provincial rate
io-Quebec border and higher rates to the east at this level of income is less than half of the fed-
of it hold. One important exception to this rule
is Ontario at the $100,000 level. At $100,000 the
5
provincial marginal tax rate in Ontario is more Our analysis shows the marginal tax rate that in-
closely aligned with the eastern provinces. For dividuals earning the average national income face.
Of course, the average income in each province
Manitoba, provincial marginal tax rates at both
differs, so the average national income is a relatively
$80,000 and $100,000 are comparable to the higher income level (compared to the rest of the
Atlantic provinces and Quebec. population) in Atlantic Canada than in Alberta or
British Columbia. It is therefore noteworthy for this
The differences in the provincial marginal in- analysis that in all provinces the marginal provincial
come tax rates have important implications for tax rate that an individual faces when earning the
the take-home pay of individuals across the national and provincial average income is the same
country who are earning the national aver- across Canada.
Table 2: Additional Income Needed For at this income level, Quebec, this number is
Individual Earning National Average $159. For New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, it is
Market Wage to Increase Take-Home Pay $155. For Newfoundland & Labrador, it is $154,
and for PEI it is $152.
by $100.
These data mean that an individual earning the
Province Additional Income average market income in, for example, Nova
Needed Scotia, must earn $16 more than a British Co-
British Columbia $139.3 lumbian to increase their take home pay by the
Alberta $143.9 same $100. The gap between Nova Scotia and
Saskatchewan $149.3
Ontario on this metric is $13. For Alberta it is $11.
Manitoba $149.8 These results show that differences in mar-
Ontario $142.1 ginal tax rates across Canada do not only effect
Quebec $159.0 high-income individuals but, rather, that they
New Brunswick $154.6 significantly influence the amount of increased
Nova Scotia $154.9 productivity or additional labour required by an
Prince Edward Island $152.2 individual in various provinces to increase their
Newfoundland & Labrador $153.8 take home pay at the margin—by $100.
Notes:
(1) Personal income tax rates include surtaxes where applicable.
(2) For comparability, the Quebec tax rates are adjusted downwards due to the federal abatement. The federal abatement
results in Quebecers paying less in federal taxes than other provinces. A direct comparison between statutory provincial
rates, without adjusting for the abatement, can be misleading in terms of judging the differences in tax rates paid in Que-
bec versus other provinces.
Scotia provides an illustrative example. An in- berta (15.0 percent—column 6 in table 3). The
dividual earning the national average income in marginal rate those at the average income level
Nova Scotia ($52,750) faces a marginal tax rate in New Brunswick face is higher than the rate
of 14.95 percent. This almost identical to the in both Alberta and Saskatchewan for individu-
marginal tax rate faced by an individual earning als in those provinces earning $250,000 (col-
$500,000 in Alberta, for instance (15 percent) umn 5 in table 3). The marginal rate for average
and higher than that faced by an individual in income earners in New Brunswick is also high-
Saskatchewan earning $500,000 (14.50 per- er than that facing British Columbians earning
cent). It is also higher than the marginal rate an $150,000 per year.
individual earning $150,000 in British Columbia
The average income earner in Newfoundland
faces (14.70 percent).
& Labrador faces a higher marginal income tax
In New Brunswick, the average income earner rate than an individual earning $250,000 in Al-
faces a marginal tax rate of 14.82 percent. This berta and the same marginal rate as an individ-
is higher than the marginal rate faced by an in- ual earning $250,000 in Saskatchewan. In fact,
dividual earning $500,000 in Saskatchewan an average income earner in Newfoundland &
(14.5 percent) and only slightly lower than in Al- Labrador faces the same marginal tax rate as an
Notes:
(1) Personal income tax include surtaxes where applicable. Only the basic personal exemption was deducted.
(2) For comparability, the Quebec tax rates are adjusted downwards due to the federal abatement. The federal abatement
results in Quebecers paying less in federal taxes than other provinces. A direct comparison between statutory provincial
rates, without adjusting for the abatement, can be misleading in terms of judging the differences in tax rates paid in Que-
bec versus other provinces.
individual earning $500,000 in Saskatchewan This section has shown that average income
and slightly less than a resident of Alberta at earners across Atlantic Canada face a similar
that income level (column 6 in table 3). marginal income tax rate to high-income resi-
dents of lower-tax provinces.
In Prince Edward Island, the marginal rate fac-
ing an individual earning the average market
Differences in total provincial tax
income is somewhat lower than the other At-
lantic provinces at 13.80 percent. This is below
burdens across Canada
the marginal rate of taxpayers in any province Partly due to the marginal tax rates discussed
earning $150,000. However, taxpayers earning in the previous section as well as different ba-
$80,000 in PEI face a marginal rate (16.70 per- sic personal income tax exemptions and rate
cent) that is higher than that facing taxpayers thresholds across the provinces, the over-
earning $150,000 in any of the three western- all provincial tax burden varies considerably
most provinces. across Canada. Table 4 illustrates this point. It
presents the basic personal income tax exemp- applicable thresholds of their personal income
tion in each province and the total provincial tax systems. This bulletin has shown that indi-
tax burden paid by an individual earning the viduals at the same level of income in different
national average income in that jurisdiction as provinces often face materially different mar-
well as at $60,000, $80,000, and $100,000. ginal tax rates.
Table 4 shows that the pattern for the dif- An individual earning the average national in-
ferences in the overall provincial tax burden come in Atlantic Canada or Quebec faces a
across Canada is similar to that described marginal tax rate between 13.80 and 14.95 per-
above for the marginal rate that the nation- cent depending on their province of residence.
al average income earner faces. For example, By comparison, residents of Ontario and all
the provincial tax burden for an individual at provinces to the west of Ontario at this same
the average income level in British Columbia is income level face a marginal rate ranging from
$2,353, $2,369 in Ontario, and $3,338 in Alber- 7.70 percent to 12.75 percent.
ta. By comparison, the provincial tax burden
This difference in marginal provincial tax rates
in the Atlantic provinces at this income level
effects the amount of additional income a per-
ranges from $4,463 in New Brunswick to $5,318
son must earn to increase their take home pay
in Nova Scotia.
by $100. In Nova Scotia, for example, an individ-
At higher income levels, the provincial tax bur- ual must earn $155 to increase their take home
den is higher in the Atlantic provinces than in pay by $100, compared to a low of $139 in Brit-
Western Canada. At $100,000 of income an in- ish Columbia.
dividual in the three western-most provinces
We have also shown that average income earn-
faces an overall provincial tax burden ranging
ers in the Atlantic region face similar tax rates
from $6,399 in British Columbia to $9,820 in
to high-income earners in lower tax jurisdic-
Saskatchewan. In Atlantic Canada, the provin-
tions, particularly Canada’s three western-most
cial tax burden at this income level ranges from
provinces.
$11,640 in New Brunswick to $13,142 in Nova
Scotia. At this income level, the total tax burden
for Manitoba is more closely aligned with Atlan- References
tic Canada than with the western provinces.
Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] (2022). Cana-
This brief section has shown that the total pro- dian Income Tax Rates for Individuals — Cur-
vincial tax burden for middle-income earners in rent and Previous Years. Government of
Atlantic Canada are much higher than in West- Canada. <https://www.canada.ca/en/rev-
ern Canada, and at the thresholds shown below enue-agency/services/tax/individuals/
$100,000 are also much higher than in Ontario. frequently-asked-questions-individuals/ca-
nadian-income-tax-rates-individuals-current-
previous-years.html>, as of August 29, 2022.
Conclusion
Durante, Alex (2021). Reviewing Recent Evidence
Canada differs from other high-income coun- of the Effect of Taxes on Economic Growth. The
tries in that it relies more heavily on sub-na- Tax Foundation. <https://taxfoundation.org/
tional governments to raise tax revenue. The reviewing-recent-evidence-effect-taxes-eco-
provinces vary considerably in the rates and nomic-growth/>, as of August 29, 2022.
Enache, Christina (2021). Sources of Government and Quebec. The Fraser Institute. <https://
Revenue in the OECD, 2021. Fiscal Fact Num- www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/high-tax-
ber 748. The Tax Foundation. <https://tax- rates-on-top-earners-in-atlantic-canada-
foundation.org/oecd-tax-revenue-2021/>, as and-quebec>, as of August 29, 2022.
of August 29, 2022.
Laurin, Alexandre (2019). The Paycheck Blues: Ben Eisen is a senior fellow in Fis-
Why Extra Work is Often Not Worth the Ef- cal and Provincial Prosperity Studies
fort for Lower-income Families. CD Howe at the Fraser Institute. He holds a
Institute. <https://www.cdhowe.org/pub- BA from the University of Toronto
lic-policy-research/paycheck-blues-why-ex- and an MPP from the University of
tra-work-often-not-worth-effort-lower-in- Toronto’s School of Public Policy and
come-families>, as of August 29, 2022. Governance.