MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and content within and inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy across curriculum form about knowledge of
teaching areas. content within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that inter-observer agreement
enhance learner form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance
literacy and learner achievement in
numeracy skills. literacy and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies to inter-observer agreement
develop critical form about teaching
and creative strategies to develop critical
thinking, as well and creative thinking, as
as other higher- well as other higher-order
order thinking thinking skills
skills. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials Efficiency
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Displayed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment proficient use of (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services and Diversity
Mother Tongue, inter-observer agreement
of Learners
Filipino and form/s done through
English to onsite / face-toface / in-
facilitate teaching person classroom
and learning. observation. Efficiency
(PPST 1.6.2).
If onsite / face-to-face /
inperson classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
Timeliness
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. Established Classroom Observation Tool (COT) Quality
Education rating sheet/s or inter-observer
safe and secure agreement form/s done through
Services
learning onsite / face-to-face / in-person
classroom observation.
environments to
enhance learning If onsite / face-to-face / inperson
through the classes are not implemented,
• through observation of
consistent synchronous / asynchronous teaching
Efficiency
implementation in other modalities; or
of policies, • through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via LAC
guidelines and session.
procedures. (PPST
2.1.2)

Timeliness
Basic 6. Maintained Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education learning (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services
environments inter-observer agreement
that promote form/s done through
fairness, respect onsite / face-to-face / in-
and care to person classroom
encourage observation.
learning. (PPST
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
2.2.2) If onsite / face-to-face / Efficiency
inperson classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum Quality
Education and Planning
Services
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
7. Established a Classroom Observation Efficiency
learner-centered Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
culture by using or inter-observer
teaching agreement form/s done
strategies that
through onsite / face-to-
respond to their
face / in-person
linguistic,
cultural, classroom observation.
socioeconomic
and religious If onsite / face-to-face /
backgrounds. inperson classes are not
(PPST 3.2.2) implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous / Timeliness
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session.
8.. Adapted and Classroom Observation Tool Quality
used culturally (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
appropriate observer agreement form/s
teaching done through onsite / face-to-
face / in-person classroom
strategies to
observation.
address the Efficiency
needs of learners If onsite / face-to-face /
from indigenous inperson classes are not
groups. (PPST 3.5 implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous / asynchronous
teaching
Timeliness
in other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
LAC session.
Basic 9. Set achievable At least one (1) lesson plan Quality
Education (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP,
and appropriate
Services WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and
learning
the likes) or one lesson from a
outcomes that selflearning module, developed
are aligned with by the ratee* and used in
learning instruction, with achievable
competencies. and appropriate learning
(PPST 4.2.2 outcomes that are aligned with Efficiency
the learning competencies as
shown in any one (1) of the
following: • lecture/discussion
• activity/activity sheet
• performance task
• rubric for assessing
performance using criteria that
appropriately describe the
target output
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessment strategies for (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services and
providing timely, inter-observer agreement
Reporting
accurate and form/s done through
constructive onsite / face-toface / in-
feedback to person classroom
improve learner observation.
performance.
(PPST 5.3.2) If onsite / face-to-face /
inperson classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Utilized A list of identified least / most Quality
Education assessment data mastered skills based on the
Services frequency of errors / correct
to inform the
modification of responses with any
one (1) of the following
teaching and
supporting MOVs
learning practices 1. accomplishment report for
Efficiency
and programs. remedial / enhancement
(PPST 5.5.2). activities (e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer Reading
Camp, Phil-IRIbased reading
program)
2. intervention material used Timeliness
for remediation /
reinforcement /
enhancement
3. lesson plan/activity log for
remediation / enhancement
utilizing of assessment data to
modify teaching and learning
practices or programs
Basic Quality
Education
Services
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
12. Build 1. Any one (1) of the following: Efficiency
relationships with 1. Proof of participation in any
parents/ activity highlighting the
guardians and the objective, such as, but not
wider school limited the following:
community to • Receipt form/monitoring
facilitate form during distribution of
involvement in learning materials, etc.
the educative • Commitment form to
process. (PPST stakeholders, developed Timeliness
6.2.2). advocacy materials, certificate
of participation that shows
parents’/stakeholders’
engagement signed by the
school head, etc.
• Home visitation forms
• Any equivalent ALS
form/document
that highlights the objective
• Others (please specify and
provide annotations)
2. Parent-teacher log or proof
of other stakeholders meeting
(e.g., one-on-one parent-
teacher learner conference log;
attendance sheet with minutes
of online or face-to-face
meeting; proof of involvement
in the learners’/parents’
orientation, etc.)
3. Any form of communication
to parents/stakeholders (e.g.,
notice of meeting; screenshot
of chat/text
message/communication with
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
parent/guardian)

Basic 13. Participated 1. Certificate of completion in a Quality

Education in professional course/training Certificate of
Services participation in a webinar,
networks to share
knowledge and to retooling, upskilling, and other
training/ seminar/ workshop
enhance practice.
with proof of implementation
(PPST 7.3.2) . 2.Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar and Efficiency
other training/ seminar/
workshop
3. Any proof of participation to
a benchmarking activity Any
proof of participation in school
LAC sessions (online/face-to-
face) certified by the LAC
Coordinator
4.Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
14. Developed a 1. Certification from the ICT
personal Coordinator / School Head /
improvement Focal Person in charge of eSAT
plan based on 2. IPCRF-DP
3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
reflection of one’s
4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
practice and
ongoing
professional
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning. (PPST
7.4.2)
5. PLUS 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of:
FACTOR various related ● committee involvement;
works / activities ● involvement as module/learning
that contribute material writer/validator;
● involvement as a resource
to the teaching
person/speaker/learning facilitator
learning process. in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship;
● advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in demonstration
teaching;
● participation as research
presenter in a forum/conference;
● mentoring of
pre-service/inservice teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period; ● others (please
specify) with annotation on how it
contributed to the teachinglearning

Rater Ratee Approving Authority