Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Draft
Draft
This chapter includes the introduction, background of the study, statement of the problem theoretical
framework, conceptual framework, hypothesis, scope and delimitation, limitation of the study,
Introduction
Grammarly is touted as the world’s most accurate English grammar checker. It claims to correct up
to ten times more mistakes than popular word processors by providing over 250 grammatical checks and
a contextual spell checker (Grammarly, 2015). Grammarly was founded in 2009 by Maz Lytvyn and Alex
Shevchenko, who first developed the platform’s grammar programming. By 2014, Grammarly was
ranked 55 in the fastest growing companies index by Deloitte and currently has over four million
registered users (Grammarly, 2015). Grammarly is an application that helps you write clearly and
effectively in English Writings especially in Essay Writings. According to Vygotsky (1962), he defined
writing as a medium reflecting the development of one’s language and critical thinking processes.
However, despite the constant emphasis on improving writing skills, in academic students writing ability
has been recognized as a serious problem. One of the main factors associated with students’ poor writing
skills may be their inaccurate grammar use or lack of linguistic knowledge relevant to academic writing.
Therefore, the goal of Schools is to provide us students with English Grammar instruction to improve our
writing skills and thinking abilities in preparation for our future purposes. Concerning the importance of
proper English grammar writing is to allow you as a writer to make your work clearer and more readable.
It is necessary to have proper English grammar in writings for credibility, readability, communication and
clarity. Also, in technology it allows us to widen our knowledge in grammar checking by using grammar
checkers in apps or websites especially in Grammarly. Although Microsoft Word (MS) recommends
users to identify and correct spelling and minor grammar errors, its functions are confined to underline the
problematic parts with some possible replacements, which lack educational comments.
Recently Grammarly provides users with more informative feedback on these errors. Hawisher,
LeBlanc, Moran, and Selfe (1996) asserted “using grammar checkers resists meaningful change by using
computers to reinforce older and often conventional ways of thinking about learning” In addition, the
technical limitations of grammar checkers, such as inaccurate feedback and an imperfect error detecting
function, resulted in pessimistic perceptions from users toward the software programs in language
classrooms However, the use of Grammarly often appears as a component of word-processing programs
According to Hyejin Yang (2018), the aforementioned grammar checker (Grammarly) is devised to
detect linguistics errors in students' essays and provide automated and prompt feedback to users.
Especially, one of the practical merits of the automated, prompt feedback is it reduces teachers’ burdens
on grading, which subsequently contributes to consistency in students’ grades. The online grammar
checker, Grammarly was chosen for this Research because it offers you to spot and fix misspelled words,
imperfect grammar, and punctuation mistakes. To summarize, the existing studies determined that
English grammar laws are pretty complex, and the rules for most grammar-checking software is
limited, so the results are often incorrect. Automatic grammar checkers have problems with context,
which is why they might let sentences that are nothing more than a mess of jumbled words go through,
and flag sentences that make perfect sense in the context of the piece. Even the most devoted Grammarly
users concede that, when it comes to the accuracy of human proofreading, Grammarly can't compete.
Even if you spell a word right, it can still be incorrect and fly under the radar of your spelling and
grammar checker.
Today grammarly has been overused by many. Most people nowadays rely fully on the grammarly
to check the grammatical errors in their works. However, they should have to keep in mind that
grammarly will not teach them the basics of the English language. Grammarly is context-based. It will
only correct your results according to context and is unable to give you the 100% accuracy in your results.
Academic texts are expected to follow recognized English grammar conventions, such as accurate
sentence structure, correct subject-verb agreement, consistent and appropriate tense, and correct use of
articles. However, many undergraduate students are still on a trajectory of development in terms of their
writing, and their linguistic choices may not always be accurate or successful (Myhill, 2009).
At the sentence level, students may have difficulties with structures that are difficult to segment,
such as constructions without function words or with ambiguous function words, as well as with
structures that place a heavy burden on short-term memory, such as interruptions and long subject-noun
phrases (Perera, 1984). Cof-fin et al. (2005) state that common grammatical errors in student writing also
include not putting a main verb in each sentence, lack of pronoun agreement in sentences, ambiguous use
of pro- nouns, and inconsistent use of tenses, as well as problems with apostrophe usage. Myhill (2009)
adds that characteristics of more limited linguistic development include overdependence on coordination,
difficulty managing ideas over long sentences, and lapses in coherence. Students from a non-English
speaking background often have significant difficulties with some aspects of English grammar that are
The study focused on the Effectiveness of Grammarly on English Writing Performance of Selected
Grade 11 STEM Students in Labas Senior High School. Specifically, it aims to answer the following
questions:
1. What are the students' perception towards grammarly as a language learning tool?
2. How do the participants describe the efficiency of the Grammarly App in their English writing
performance?
3. What are the participant's lived experience in using the Grammarly App in their English writing
performance?
Theoretical Framework
Grammarly is one of the powerful tools that make it easy to check user writing for grammar errors,
potential stylistic mistakes, and other features of interest. Grammarly is the free online proofreading
website that can be used to scan documents for grammar mistakes. (Muhammad,2018)
This research is also supported by the research findings of Prensky, (2006), he argues that Grammarly is
one of the software that can be used in language learning, especially in syntax English, and can be good
Grammarly software is effective to help teachers and learners in correcting the syntax English. It is
because Grammarly is not only able to identify punctuation (such as the missing spaces after the periods)
and the spelling mistakes, including the proper noun and provided several alternative possibilities for the
misspelled words, but also identify fragments and offer advice on the verb form, although often no
suggested correction are presented, and explanations were complex. (Prensky,2016) On the other hand,
Grammarly, as one of the developed program in 21st century has been claimed as an easy tool that can
help students and academies on their writing by checking the spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
and providing a comprehensive and useful feedback including correction and useful feedback including
correction and suggestion to make the writing more readable, clear, precise, effective, mistake-free, and
Also Bintan, (2016) mention that using Grammarly in evaluating his academic writing gave him “a
valuable learning experience”, especially in enriching the English grammar. He also shared his experience
on the feedback he received and he seemed to be satisfied with the feedback given. He saw it was
effective in “giving him the explanation on his error and he could understand hos error better”. He also
admitted that his evaluation helped him in determining the errors and this correction made him “aware of
his errors in writing”. It can be seen that using Grammarly in evaluating academic writing seemed to
Conceptual Framework
Research through
Internet.
interact. The traits or properties that you want to investigate are known as variables. A literature
review of existing studies and theories on the topic is used to develop the conceptual framework.
A conceptual framework illustrates what you expect to find through your research. It defines the
relevant variables for your study and maps out how they might relate to each other. You should
The Input-Process-Output approach, generally termed as the IPO model, is the study’s
conceptual framework. Figure 1 highlights the need of examining performance and processing
systems based on the assumption that raw materials (inputs) are converted into outputs by
internal system processes (outputs). The input consists of a statement of the problem to be solved
as well as the study’s findings. The research procedure centered on data collection and analysis
in order to analyze and examine the responses of respondents to the researchers’ produced survey
1. The researchers assumed that the respondents would be a reliable source of information that would
3. The researcher assumed that the respondents would be honest in answering the questions.
4. The researcher would be able to deeply explain the purpose of the study to its respondents.
Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant relationship between the Effectiveness of Grammarly and
The general intent of this study is to know the Effectiveness of Grammarly on English Writing
Performance of Selected Grade 11 STEM Students in Labas Senior High School. The study considers the
student’s personal information such as their name (optional), gender, age, and section.
The researcher limits the study to 50 grade 11 students under the strand of Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics in Labas Senior High School who will represent as the population. Each of
the respondents is given a questionnaire to answer. The students will be selected from 2 different sections
This study will be conducted with limited amount of financial resources and time framework.
This study will not cover the other problems that are not necessarily connected on the
Effectiveness of Grammarly on English Writing Performance of students. The other students which do
not fall as part of Grade 11 STEM students are not within the scope of this research. The study will be
done through the utilization of questionnaire to the students as a survey and reference. By their strategy
the researchers will be able to know the Effectiveness of Grammarly on English Writing Performance of
The study focused on explaining the Effectiveness of Grammarly on English Writing Performance
of Selected Grade 11 STEM Students in Labas Senior High School. Moreover, the results of the study
Respondents. The respondents will have an awareness on the effectiveness of grammarly on their
For the teachers/mentors, for them to be aware of those students who are relying in Grammarly, and
they can advise their students on what they are going to do to learn grammar more efficiently on their
own. For instructors also to effectively deal with student's learning regarding grammar, and make sure
that the learners understand the importance of grammar on their English Writing Performance.
For the parents, in order for them to understand the situation of their children on how their child learn
grammar more, and also to encourage their children to reflect on their own learnings and on the impact of
Future Researchers. The findings of the study will serve as a reference material and a guide for future
researchers who wish to conduct the same experimental study or any study related to the Effectiveness of
Grammarly - is a "writing assistant" that job seekers, writers, and other professionals can use
to proofread and edit their documents. It checks for more than 250 types of spelling, grammar, and
STEM - an acronym for the fields of science, technology, engineering and math.
Syntax - the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.
Chapter 2
This chapter deals with the review of documents related and relevant to the effectiveness of grammarly on
English writing performance of selected grade 11 students which the researchers have pursued to shed
Foreign Studies
The current study posits that AWE programs like Grammarly are valuable L2 writing
tools that can help educators grade writing and help students revise compositions. The following literature
review explores the current state of AWE research and the role AWE has in the context of L2 writing.
The development of AWE software has enabled L2 learners to receive feedback on language and content
in addition to automated scores. Benefits to writing accuracy were recognized in AWE studies (Anson,
2006; Dikli, 2010). These results drive the popularity of integrating automatic corrective feedback in the
classroom (Li, Link, & Hegelheimer, 2015; Zhang & Hyland, 2018). Researchers continue to find AWE
helpful for measuring linguistic accuracy (Li et al., 2015). Li et al. (2015) used AWE error reports to
explore the role of Criterion in an ESL writing curriculum. By looking at error types, they found that
automatic writing evaluation software led to increased revisions and improved accuracy. Li et al. (2015)
required students to meet a benchmark score through AWE, which resulted in higher participation with
Wellness Science Library, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal: Grammarly is an online
phrase structure and spelling checker system obtained from the Health Science Librarian, Manipal
Academy of Postsecondary Education. The lion's share of the respondents who took an interest in the
investigation was utilizing Grammarly for Microsoft Office. The Study saw that clients utilize the device
for various purposes like composing research papers, papers, postulations, books, reports, and course
papers. The vast majority of the clients utilized this apparatus due to the limit of Microsoft word as found
in the Study. Grammarly coordinates with Microsoft Office to show definitions and equivalents through
Huang et al. (2020) studied the effectiveness of using Grammarly to develop students' English
academic writing skills. This contextual analysis's motivation was to examine the viability of utilizing
Grammarly in EFL composing during a 16-week trial period at a four-year college in China. The
outcomes uncovered that understudies' composing execution altogether expanded all through the multi-
week intercession. This recommends that applying Grammarly recorded as a hard copy class is a viable
Aidil (2021) investigated students' perception of the "Grammarly application" students' effectiveness
concurred that Grammarly was valuable for learning scholastic composition. The information showed that
this program had given free openness, programmed amendment, and helpful input. Four parts of scholarly
composing that helped the program were intricacy, objectivity, custom, and supporting. Two
disadvantages were found in this program, like misdirecting and over-checking. The discoveries were
talked about into two points dependent on the exploration questions and afterward dissected distinctly.
The investigation was distributed in the online diary of the University of Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.
Local Studies
The Pangasinan State University has purchased Grammarly® software, which is generally considered as
one of the best grammar and plagiarism checkers available. The aim of this paper is to evaluate software
based on the opinions of graduate students from PSU Open University Systems. The respondents were
chosen at random from among 20% of the total graduate students in the Batch 2018 who had completed
their thesis writing before graduation. A SUS questionnaire and follow up the interview as part of the
triangulation method was used in order to determine the usability of the software, its strengths, and
weaknesses.
According to the study's findings, the majority of respondents believe the software in use is usable. The
users described the software's strengths as automatic detection of mistakes in Conceptual Writing,
Grammar, Punctuation, Sentence Structure, Style, and Vocabulary Enhancement, among others. While
other users noticed some issues in the software that could be corrected in the future, the overall result
demonstrates a considerable improvement in writing for both English and non-English majors. There is a
considerable change in confidence level in writing among students who are not English majors.
Local Literature
On February 15, 2018, at the Jose de Venecia e-Library, Lingayen Campus, the Center for English
Language (CEL) launched the use of the licensed anti-plagiarism software, Grammarly, in Pangasinan
grammar, and punctuation errors, improves vocabulary usage, and suggests citations as an automated
The use of [such] software would be the initial step to operationalize the center [CEL] because we don’t
have the capacity to ascertain the plagiarized text so we need software that is licensed (Dr. Luzviminda Q.
Dr. Ramos also added that the center is set to establish a standard policy in the University for
undergraduate and graduate researches that “all these and dissertations should pass through the CEL by
The policy set is in response to the unit’s mandate to edit theses, dissertations, modules, and test items,
among others; and to offer tutorial services, and short term training courses.
Ms. Ma. Angela Navoa-Concepcion, Training and Development Manager of Hopkins International Inc.-
sole distributor of licensed Grammarly, oriented 40 PSU grammarians and editors on the know-hows of
Grammarly.
Concepcion emphasized that the software, which also detects grammar errors, is a very useful tool in the
academic field because it includes features such as anti-plagiarism / citation audit, revision tool, grammar
dashboard, context optimized synonyms, and adaptive speller check, all of which are extremely useful in
1. The researchers assumed that the respondents would be a reliable source of information that would
3. The researcher assumed that the respondents would be honest in answering the questions.
4. The researcher would be able to deeply explain the purpose of the study to its respondents.