Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Dental Traumatology 2014; doi: 10.1111/edt.

12147

Prevalence and complications of


trauma to the primary dentition in a
subpopulation of Spanish children in
southern Europe

Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza1, Abstract – Background: During the first years of life, when children begin
Alejandro Iglesias-Linares2, to walk and socialize, they are particularly vulnerable to traumatic injuries
Rosa Mª Yan~ ez-Vico3, Camilo to the primary teeth; indeed, after dental caries, such injuries are the sec-
Abalos-Labruzzi4 ond most frequent cause of pediatric dental consultation. Nonetheless, the
1
Paedriatic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, reported prevalence of trauma to the primary teeth varies depending on
University of Seville; 2Stomatology IV, School of the literature source, type of injury, the patient’s age, and the most com-
Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid; mon associated complications. Aim: To analyze new epidemiological data
3
Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of and complications associated with traumatic injuries to the primary teeth
Seville; 4Restorative Dentistry, School of of Spanish children. Material and methods: A retrospective study was car-
Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain ried out in a subpopulation of 879 Spanish children in southern Europe
aged between one and 7 years old, with primary and early mixed dentition.
Clinical and radiological records were obtained from all pediatric patients
who presented trauma to the primary teeth, with a follow-up period of
3–5 years. Results: A total of 21.72% of children examined had some
kind of dental trauma and the most common age range for injuries to the
primary teeth was 1–3 years old. The most common injuries in deciduous
teeth were subluxation (47.29% of injuries affected the periodontal liga-
Key words: tooth traumatism; temporal denti- ment), intrusion (23.15%), and avulsion (13.63%). On the other hand,
tion comparatively more complications were recorded as a result of intrusion
(32 of 47 intruded teeth). Conclusions: In this Spanish subpopulation, a
Correspondence to: Alejandro Iglesias
Linares, School of Dentistry, Complutense pediatric dental consultation as a result of traumatic dental injuries in pri-
University of Madrid, Plaza Ramon y 28040. mary dentition is most frequent in 1- and 2-year-olds, and subluxation is
Madrid, Spain the commonest injury in the primary dentition. In turn, intrusion is associ-
e-mail: aleigl01@ucm.es ated with an increased frequency of complications in both the deciduous
Accepted 26 September, 2014 and the permanent teeth.

After caries, a traumatic dental injury is presently the (2–11). No obvious gender differences have been
second most common reason for visiting a pediatric reported (2, 12), and the teeth most commonly affected
dentist. The clear decrease in the frequency of caries, are the upper central incisors (involving the mesioinci-
as evidenced by epidemiologic studies in developed sal angle), followed by the lateral incisors and the
countries, suggests that tooth injuries may become the canines. Most authors have described a strong correla-
leading cause of consultation in pediatric dental prac- tion between protrusion, incompetent lip seal, and den-
tice (1). tal trauma in both the primary and the permanent
Children are particularly vulnerable to traumatic dentition (13–15). Authors such as Andreasen et al. (9)
injuries to the primary teeth in the first years of life, consider luxation of any degree of severity to be the
which is when they are beginning to walk and social- most frequent injury to the primary teeth (16, 17).
ize. According to prospective and retrospective studies, Traumatic injuries to the primary dentition can
the prevalence of such injuries varies considerably cause complications that range from practically no neg-
between 4% and 33% (2–11). The differences in ative effects for either the injured tooth or its perma-
reported prevalence are attributed to multiple factors, nent successor to significant consequences for both
including type of lesion, study setting, and population (4–6, 11, 18, 19). The extent of the complication for
analyzed (9). the permanent successor depends fundamentally on the
With respect to age, different authors have identified development stage of the permanent tooth and the
the age range of 1–4 years as the most vulnerable per- intensity of the trauma (11, 18–24). Andreasen & Ravn
iod, with the peak incidence between 10 and 24 months (21) found that the successor tooth was affected in

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1
2 Mendoza-Mendoza et al.

63% of cases involving infants of <2 years old, 53% of


Results
3- and 4-year-olds, and 24% of 5 and 6-year-olds.
These results, and the high frequency of dental trauma
Age, gender, and time to pediatric dental consultation
in small children, suggest that special attention should
associated to deciduous tooth trauma
be devoted to such injuries.
The behavior of the child is a factor that must be Of a total of 879 children examined, 191 (21.72%) had
taken into account when deciding on treatment (14). some kind of traumatic injury to the primary dentition
However, most traumatic injuries to the primary between 1 and 6 years of age. In this study, the trauma
teeth lead to the extraction of the affected tooth as a most commonly occurred between the ages of 1 and
result of failure to provide early treatment (10, 25). 3 years old (Table 1).
The evidence-based clinical guides of the Interna- Of 191 children with injured primary teeth, 101 were
tional Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) boys and 90 girls (Table 1). When we matched the ages
recommend maximal conservative management, based of patients who experienced some dental trauma
on the principles of damage containment (26, 27). against the ages of the overall study sample (1–5 years:
The present study evaluates epidemiologic aspects of 191 traumatic dental injuries in all), 1- and 2-year-olds
injuries to the primary teeth, the extent and severity of made up more than 50% of the trauma cases at all the
such injuries, the time that elapses before visiting the ages recorded, with a total of 100 of 191 trauma cases.
pediatric dental office in preschool children and their More specifically, according to age group, of 191
relation to the age of the patient, and complications in trauma patients with some dental injury, 43 were
both primary and permanent dentition. 1 year old, 57 were 2 years old, 42 were 3 years old, 22
were 4 years old, and 27 were 5 years old or more. By
age and gender, boys were the most frequently affected
Material and methods by dental trauma in all age groups, except in the
3-year-old group, where girls predominated.
Study subjects With respect to the time from trauma until the first
A retrospective study was carried out in southern Eur- pediatric dental consultation, most of the patients were
ope involving a subpopulation of 879 Spanish children seen on the first day after the trauma (n = 94), 23 were
between 1 and 7 years old with primary and early seen in the first week, 19 after 1 month, 25 after
mixed dentition. All children had primary teeth when 6 months, and 30 after more than 6 months. Signifi-
they were examined. cantly, those who were most quickly taken to the den-
tist after the trauma were the youngest children (1- and
2-year-olds) (Table 2). More specifically, most of those
Clinical and radiological assessment taken to the dentist in the first 24 h after the trauma
The clinical records of every child were obtained and were in the 1-year-old group, followed by the 2-year-
also the radiologic records of those patients with olds. In contrast, the group that took more than
trauma to the primary dentition. Clinical and radio- 6 months to visit the dentist basically consisted of chil-
logic evaluations were made both when the patient dren between 5 and 7 years of age (Table 2).
was first examined following the injury and on fol-
low-up visits at one, three, and then every 6 months
until the permanent successor erupted. The clinical Table 1. Sample distribution according to age and gender
assessment of complications was based on recording Gender (F/M)
a series of variables, which included grayish or yel-
low changes of color in the teeth, phlegmons and fis- Age (years) Trauma No trauma % trauma cases1
tulas, periapical radiotransparency, pathological 1 19/24 29 59.72% (43 of 72)
resorption, canal obliteration, delayed or accelerated 2 25/32 73 43.84% (57 of 130)
eruption of successors, and damage to the permanent 3 27/15 145 22.45% (42 of 187)
tooth germ. 4 10/12 175 11.16% (22 of 197)
The same pediatric dentist specialist (A.M.M) carried >5 9/18 266 9.21% (27 of 293)
out all diagnoses, treatment, and clinical and radiologic
F, female; M, male.
controls in a private pediatric dental practice. 1
Percentage of all consultations.

Statistical analysis Table 2. Time from trauma to pediatric dental visit


A descriptive statistical analysis based on frequency Age 1d 1w 1m 6m >6 m
tables was used for qualitative variables, with (years) [n(%)] [n(%)] [n(%)] [n(%)] [n(%)]
calculation of means and standard deviation (SD).
1 30 (31.9) 8 (34.78) 2 (10.52) 2 (10.52) 1 (3.33)
Variables considered were as follows: tooth; gender 2 27 (28.72) 5 (21.73) 10 (52.63) 7 (28) 8 (26.66)
of the patient; type of trauma; complications deriving 3 18 (19.14) 6 (26.08) 2 (10.52) 8 (32) 8 (26.66)
from the injury; age of the patient; and time until 4 9 (9.57) 0 4 (21.05) 5 (20) 4 (13.33)
first visit. The study then explored associations >5 10 (10.63) 4 (17.39) 1 (5.26) 3 (12) 9 (30)
between variables, including type of trauma and its
d, day; w, week; m, month.
complications.

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Tooth traumatism 3

erupted were found to be damaged (two cases of hypo-


Type of trauma and complications
plasia and two of hypomineralization), and in one case,
The most common injuries to the primary dentition the permanent successor showed delayed eruption with
were subluxation (47.29% of lesions affected the peri- respect to the other central incisor. Necrosis was the
odontal ligament), followed by intrusion (23.15%) and most frequent complication in the remaining cases of
then avulsion (13.63%). It can be stated therefore that, dental trauma.
in the primary teeth, damage to the supporting tissue is
more common than to the hard tissue of the tooth
Discussion
(68.35% of all lesions) (Table 3). On the basis of our
results, the most commonly affected primary teeth were According to the findings of prospective and retrospec-
the upper central incisors (86.9%). It should also be tive studies, the prevalence of traumatic injuries to the
noted that 297 lesions were recorded for 191 children primary teeth ranges between 4% and 33% (2–11). In
with some dental injury, as some children had more our series, prevalence was found to be 21.72%. In line
than one injury affecting different teeth (Table 3). with most authors, we consider that the reasons for the
Regarding intrusion, in 25.53% of cases, more than reported differences in prevalence can be attributed to
50% of the crown of the deciduous tooth was still visi- multiple factors, including lesion classification, study
ble; in 53.19%, <50% of the crown was visible, and in setting, and population analyzed (9, 11).
the remaining 21.27%, intrusion was complete or The literature reports that traumatic dental injuries
almost complete, with the tooth in some instances dis- occur most frequently in the first years of life when
appearing entirely into the alveolar bone. With respect children are beginning to walk and socialize, and the
to the complications associated with the 47 intruded most common underlying cause in these cases is an
teeth and the treatment for the 40 teeth that re-erupted accidental fall. Our series agreed with these findings
spontaneously (0–6 months), the most common prob- (6, 12), with the highest incidence corresponding to
lem was pathological root resorption, with or without 2-year-olds who had had a fall. Like Bastone (6) and
associated necrosis. With respect to avulsion, we docu- Garcia-Godoy (28), we observed no significant gender
mented 29 cases (13.63% of lesions affected the peri- differences at this age when accidental falls tend to
odontal ligament). Of the 297 lesions in our series of occur at home, and the most frequently affected teeth
191 patients, we monitored 260 cases, as the rest of the by far were the upper central incisors (86.9%), proba-
patients failed to report for follow-up consultations. As bly because these teeth are most exposed to damage in
a result, we were only able to assess possible complica- the event of an accidental fall or collision (28).
tions for these 260 lesions. One significant finding was that 30 children in this
Intrusion was the type of dental injury that involved age group (1- and 2-year-olds) (57%) were taken to the
most complications in the primary teeth (32 cases), par- dentist within 24 h of the injury. After comparing this
ticularly pathological resorption associated with pulp figure against the total number of 879 children studied
necrosis (12 cases) followed, in order of frequency, by (72 of whom were 1 year old and 130 2 years old), it
necrosis (nine cases) and pathological resorption (seven may be concluded from our study that dental trauma is
cases). In addition, the permanent teeth in four of the a common reason for consulting a pediatric dentist at
44 cases of intrusion that were monitored until they this age. In a 2010 series, which included 359 patients

Table 3. Type of traumatism and resulting complications


Complications of PS tooth Complications of primary tooth
Traumatism (n [%]) Delayed eruption Perm. Damage Necrosis Obliteration Pathol. Reabs. Pathol. Reabs. & Necrosis No Re-Eruption
Periodontal ligament lesion (203 [68.35])
Subluxation (961 [47.29%]) – – 13 4 10 1 –
Lateral luxation (192 [9.35%]) – – 8 – – 2 –
Extrusive luxation (12 [5.9%]) – – – – – – –
Avulsion (29 [13.63%]) 1 2 – – – – –
Intrusion (47 [23.15%]) 1 43 9 – 7 12 4
Hard tissue lesion (94 (31.64])
E fracture (304 [31.91%]) – – – – – – –
E/D fracture (28 [29.78%]) – – 9 – – – –
E/D/P fracture (13 [13.82%]) – – 1 – – – –
C C/R fracture (175 [18.08%]) – – – – – – –
R fracture (66 [6.38%]) – – 3 – – – –
PS, permanent successor; E, enamel; D/E, dentoenamel; P/D/E, pulp/dentoenamel; R, root; CC/R, Complicated crown–root.
1
Of a total of 96 subluxations, 82 were satisfactorily monitored, clinically and radiographically, during the indicated periods.
2
Of a total of 19 lateral luxations, 14 were satisfactorily monitored, clinically and radiographically, during the indicated periods.
3
Two cases of damage to permanent tooth were due to hypomineralization and two to hypoplasia.
4
Of a total of 30 enamel fractures, 20 were satisfactorily monitored, clinically and radiographically, during the indicated periods.
5
Of a total of 17 complicated C/R fractures, 16 were satisfactorily monitored, clinically and radiographically, during the indicated periods.
6
Of a total of six complicated C/R fractures, five were satisfactorily monitored, clinically and radiographically, during the indicated periods.

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
4 Mendoza-Mendoza et al.

aged 1–15 years who sought emergency dental care in a parents whose children had suffered intrusion visited
regional hospital, Diaz et al. (29) recorded a prevalence the pediatric dental office within 12 h of the injury
rate for primary tooth trauma of 12.7% for the 1–6 taking place, whereas 49.2% of children in our series
age group, with the most frequent underlying cause at made an emergency visit in the first 24 h after the
this age being an accidental fall. The authors studied trauma, and 60.93% (57 of 94 patients) of these were
the time that elapsed from injury to emergency treat- one or 2 years old.
ment in children and adolescents and found that 67.4% On the other hand, complications in the form of
of patients aged 1–15 years sought help in the first necrosis were unquestionably more frequent in cases
24 h. Our data, however, indicated that, when only the that involved enamel–dentin fracture (32.14% of all
primary teeth were considered (that is, children from 1 enamel and dentinal fractures) in comparison with
to 6 years old), the percentage of dental trauma other more complex kinds of hard tissue injury. This
observed was lower. Differences concerning the type of could have been due to delaying visiting the pediatric
population or whether the setting is a hospital or a pri- dentist for this type of trauma, in comparison with
vate pediatric dental practice may also account for the other seemingly more alarming injuries that prompt
observed differences in care for injured teeth in the first parents to seek help quickly. Other consequences of
24 h after a trauma. primary teeth trauma have been described, such as
With regard to the type of lesion, the alveolar pro- changes in the coloration of the crown, pulp necrosis,
cess in preschool children is characterized by large obliteration of the pulp canal, gingival retraction, dis-
bone marrow spaces and is relatively flexible. Further- placement of the primary tooth, pathological root
more, the periodontal ligament, which acts as a ‘physi- resorption (internal or external), abscesses or cellulitis,
ological hammock’, is very elastic and so the teeth are alterations in the physiological root resorption pro-
less firmly held in place. As a result, in the event of a cess, or premature loss of the primary teeth (9, 11,
slight traumatic injury, the teeth displace rather than 16–21).
fracture (2, 3). This would explain the considerable dif- In the permanent dentition, alterations of the crown
ference in prevalence that we observed for injuries (hypocalcification and hypoplasia), of the crown/root
affecting the periodontal ligament in the primary teeth (dilaceration), root (duplication, angulation, dilacer-
and those affecting the hard tissue and/or pulp. Other ation, and arrested development), disturbances in the
studies (2–4, 17, 30) show that periodontal ligament permanent successor (tumors and sequestration of the
damage is the commonest type of lesion in the primary entire tooth germ), or alterations in eruption are all, in
dentition. In line with this, subluxation was the most turn, consequences of the close relation between the
frequently observed dental trauma affecting the pri- apex of the primary tooth and the developing perma-
mary dentition in our series, followed by intrusion then nent successor (9, 11, 20–24, 28). Hypocalcification
avulsion. It may be worth observing that a subluxation and/or hypoplasia (enamel discoloration of and/or
is not always reported, because it is an injury of lesser defects) has been described as the most frequent mal-
magnitude, and so it would not necessarily be described formative sequelae of trauma in the primary teeth (9).
as the most frequent type of injury. In fact, many stud- In a longitudinal study published by Diab et al. (17)
ies describe luxation and avulsion as the most frequent involving 255 traumatized primary teeth, 23% showed
types of trauma in the primary dentition (6, 17, 30), developmental disturbances in the permanent successor,
although other authors, such as Diaz in 2010 (29), have and intrusive luxation was the lesion type that gave rise
described subluxation as the most common type of to most sequelae in the primary teeth. Disturbed erup-
injury in primary teeth (38.6%), followed by avulsion tion occurred less frequently and was related to avulsed
(16.6%). Our own data showed that intrusion was primary teeth in two cases and to intrusive luxation in
more frequent than avulsion in the primary teeth. The one. In comparison with the previously mentioned
prevalence of avulsion of primary teeth was similar to studies by Andreasen (9), Andreasen and Ravn (21),
that reported by Christophersen et al. (31), who Assuncao Da Silva et al. (33), Diab et al. (17), or the
recorded a rate of 0.8%, which is much lower than the article by Sennhenn-Kirchner (35), which recorded a
7–13% cited by Andreasen and Andreasen in the Text- 20% injury rate, our own data point to a lesser fre-
book and Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth quency of damage to the permanent successor. Specifi-
(9). However, as Christophersen mentions, the calcula- cally, of the 176 cases of damage to the periodontal
tions of the above authors were based on hospital ligament evaluated, 3.4% involved damage to the per-
data. manent tooth and only 1.1% involved delayed erup-
In our series, intrusion was the second most fre- tion. In our series, the primary tooth injuries that
quent type of lesion in the primary dentition. In this produced the most serious sequelae for the permanent
respect, and in agreement with other similar studies, successor germ were intrusion and avulsion, with hypo-
the majority of children who sustained an intrusion calcification and/or hypoplasia being the commonest
injury were 2 years old or younger, coinciding with malformative sequelae. Regarding the much less fre-
the period when they are learning to walk (4, 28, quent alterations in the chronology of dental eruption,
32). Like Assuncao Da Silva et al. (33), we found the observed prevalence was 1.1% for intrusion and
this to be the commonest type of injury up until the 2.2% for traumatic avulsion. There were no cases of
age of 2 years, although those authors reported a damage to the permanent successor germ recorded as
prevalence of 29.3% for primary tooth intrusion. In the result of an injury that damaged the hard tissue or
2009, Colak et al. (34) found that only 24.3% of the hard tissue and dental pulp.

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Tooth traumatism 5

11. Norton E, O’Connell AC. Traumatic dental injuries and their


Conclusions association with malocclusion in the primary dentition of
Trauma to the deciduous teeth was observed to be Irish children. Dent Traumatol 2012;28:81–6.
12. Onetto JE, Flores MT, Garbarino ML. Dental trauma in
most prevalent in children of 1 or 2 years of age children and adolescents in Valparaiso, Chile. Endod Dent
(24.10% and 29.23%, respectively, of all injuries in Traumatol 1994;10:223–7.
the primary dentition). Dental trauma is the most 13. Dearing SG. Overbite, overjet, lip-drape and incisor tooth
frequent reason for a pediatric dental consultation fracture in children. N Z Dent J 1984;80:50–2.
in children of these ages (59.72% and 43.48%, 14. Hunter ML, Hunter B, Kindong A, Addy M, Dummer PM.
respectively). Traumatic injury to maxillary incisor teeth in a group of
Following dental trauma, young infants under South Wales schoolchildren. Endod Dent Traumatol
2 years of age are taken to the dental clinic sooner 1990;6:260–4.
15. Petti S, Tarsitani G. Traumatic injuries to anterior teeth in
than older children. Italian schoolchildren: prevalence and risk factors. Endod
The most frequent primary tooth injury in the pres- Dent Traumatol 1996;12:294–7.
ent study was subluxation (47.29% of all injuries in 16. Flores MT. Traumatic injuries in the primary dentition. Dent
the deciduous teeth), followed by intrusion (23.15%) Traumatol 2002;18:287–98. Review.
and avulsion (13.63%). 17. Diab M, Elbadrawy HE. Intrusion injuries of primary inci-
Necrosis of the primary tooth was the main compli- sors. Part I: review and management. Quintessence Int
cation after dental trauma. In turn, hypoplasia and 2000;31:327–34. Review.
18. Altun C, Cehreli ZC, G€ uven G, Acikel C. Traumatic intru-
hypomineralization were the most frequent sequelae
sion of primary teeth and its effects on the permanent succes-
in the developing permanent tooth, while odonto- sors: a clinical follow-up study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
mas and root dilaceration were rare or infrequent. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:493–8.
Traumatic intrusion that gave rise to the largest 19. Borum MK, Andreasen JO. Sequelae of trauma to primary
number of complications in the primary teeth, with maxillary incisors. Part I. Complications in the primary denti-
the most frequently observed being pathological tion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:31–44.
resorption, with or without associated pulp necrosis. 20. Tozoglu S, Yolcu U, Tozoglu U. Developmental disturbance
Likewise, intrusion was the type of trauma that gave of maxillary lateral incisor after trauma. Dent Traumatol
2007;23:85–6.
rise to most sequelae for the permanent successor,
21. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ. The effect of traumatic injuries to
with hypoplasia and hypomineralization being the primary teeth on their permanent successors. Eur J Oral Sci
most frequent alterations. 1971;79:284–94.
22. Odersj€o ML, Koch G. Developmental disturbances in perma-
nent sucessors after injuries to maxillary primary incisors. Eur
References J Paediatr Dent 2001;4:165–72.
23. Ravn JJ. Developmental disturbances in permanent teeth
1. Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries – a after avulsion of their primary predecessor. Scand J Dent Res
12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:603– 1975;83:131–4.
11. Review. 24. Needleman HL. The art and science of managing trau-
2. Cunha RF, Pugliesi DMC, Vieira AEM. Oral trauma in Bra- matic injuries to primary teeth. Dent Traumatol 2011;27:
zilian patients aged 0-3 years. Dent Traumatol 2001;17:210–2. 295–9.
3. Gabris K, Tarjan I, Rozsa N. Dental trauma in children pre- 25. Kahabuka FK, Willemsen W, van’t Hof M, Ntabaye MK,
senting for treatment at the Department of Dentistry for chil- Burgersdijk R, Frankenmolen F et al. Initial treatment of
dren and Orthodontics, Budapest, 1985–1999. Dent traumatic dental injuries by dental practitioners. Endod Dent
Traumatol 2001;17:103–8. Traumatol 1998;14:206–9.
4. Kramer PF, Zembruski C, Ferreira SH, Feldens CA. Trau- 26. Flores MT, Malmgren B, Andersson I, Andreasen JO, Bak-
matic dental injuries in Brazilian preschool children. Dent land LK, Barnett F et al. Guidelines for the management of
Traumatol 2003;19:299–303. traumatic dental injuries. III. Primary teeth. Dent Traumatol
5. de Amorim Lde F, da Costa LR, Estrela C. Retrospective 2007;23:196–202.
study of traumatic dental injuries in primary teeth in a Brazil- 27. Malmgren B, Andreasen JO, Flores MT, Robertson A, DiAn-
ian specialized pediatric practice. Dent Traumatol gelis AJ, Andersson I et al. International Association of Den-
2011;27:368–73. tal Traumatology. Guidelines for the management of
6. Bastone EB, Freer TJ, McNamara JR. Epidemiology of den- traumatic dental injuries. III. Injuries in the primary teeth.
tal trauma: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J 2000;45:2– Dent Traumatol 2012;28:174–82.
9. Review. 28. Garcia-Godoy F, Olivo M. Injuries to primary and perma-
7. Otuyemi OD, Segun-Ojo IO, Adegboye AA. Traumatic ante- nent teeth treated in a private paedodontic practice. J Can
rior dental injuries in Nigerian preschool children. East Afr Dent Assoc 1979;45:281–4.
Med J 1996;73:604–6. 29. Dıaz JA, Bustos L, Brandt AC, Fernandez BE. Dental inju-
8. Glendor U, Halling A, Andersson L, Eilert-Petersson E. Inci- ries among children and adolescents aged 1–15 years attend-
dence of traumatic tooth injuries in children and adolescents ing to public hospital in Temuco, Chile. Dent Traumatol
in the county of Vastmanland, Sweden. Swed Dent J 2010;26:254–61.
1996;20:15–28. 30. Altay N, Gungor HC. A retrospective study of dento-alveolar
9. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L, editors. Text- injuries of children in Ankara, Turkey. Dent Traumatol
book and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 4th 2001;17:201–4.
edn. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. 31. Christophersen P, Freund M, Harild L. Avulsion of primary
10. Kahabuka FK, Plasschaert A, van’t Hof M. Prevalence of teeth and sequelae on permanent successors. Dent Traumatol
teeth with untreated dental trauma among nursery and pri- 2005;21:320–3.
mary school pupils in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Dent Trau- 32. Arikan V, S€ onmez H. Knowledge level of primary school teach-
matol 2001;17:109–13. ers regarding traumatic dental injuries and their emergency

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
6 Mendoza-Mendoza et al.

management before and after receiving an informative leaflet. 34. Colak I, Markovic D, Petrovic B, Peric T, Milenkovic A. A
Dent Traumatol 2012;28:101–7. retrospective study of intrusive injuries in primary dentition.
33. Assuncao Da Silva RL, Ferelle A, Hiromi Iwakura ML, Dent Traumatol 2009;25:605–10.
Cunha RF. Effects on permanent teeth after luxation injuries 35. Sennhenn-Kirchner S, Jacobs HG. Traumatic injuries to the
to the primary predecessors: a study in children assisted at an primary dentition and effects on the permanent successors—a
emergency service. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:165–70. clinical follow-up study. Dent Traumatol 2006;22:237–41.

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

You might also like